Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 08:05:55AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> probably we should remove epigrass. It seems way harder to get dash and
> panel trough NEW than getting epigrass accepted again once these might
> be in Debian.
>
> Sad to see it go since it could help in the next pande
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: retitle -1 RM: imdbpy -- RoM; rc-buggy; should be replaced by
cinemagoer
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:imdbpy
Hi Moritz,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 05:56:25AM +, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> I currently don't the time for it, le
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #1079959 [src:imdbpy] Should imdbpy be removed from unstable?
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> retitle -1 RM: imdbpy -- RoM; rc-buggy; should be replaced by cinemagoer
Bug #1079959 [src:imdbpy] Should imdbpy be removed from unstable?
C
Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2024 07:49:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1069478: fixed in datefudge 1.27
has caused the Debian Bug report #1069478,
regarding datefudge: FTBFS on armhf: ./datefudge.c:91: multiple definition of
`__clock_gettime64'; datefudge.o:./datefudge.c:91: firs
Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2024 10:00:26 +0200
with message-id <5e5bb560-95db-43ca-b935-2c4b57d80...@debian.org>
and subject line Closing astroquery bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #1057543,
regarding astroquery: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'imp'
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2024 08:43:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1070885: fixed in openocd 0.12.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1070885,
regarding openocd: FTBFS with libgpiod/2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Source: nbd
Version: 1:3.26.1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: all /usr-move bugs are rc-severity now
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: dep17m2
X-Debbugs-Cc: bi...@debian.org
Hi Wouter and Michael,
thanks to Michael for resolving #1073693 via a NMU and to Wouter for
accepting the N
Package: nfs-ganesha
Version: 5.9-3
Severity: serious
Justification: do not reintroduce aliased locations
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: dep17m2
Hi,
we filed #1071916 about moving systemd units from aliased locations to
/usr earlier and you fixed it in 4.3-11. Now with version 5.9-3, aliased
Source: gitlab-ci-multi-runner
Version: 14.10.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Hi,
gitlab-ci-multi-runner fails to build from source in unstable on amd64.
The tail of the build log does not make that much sense to me. I hope
that someone else can decypher it:
|
gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-run
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1079387 important
Bug #1079387 [rust-typenum] rust-typenum - test failure on i386.
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1079387: https://bugs.debian.o
Dear Helmut,
I agree with your analysis. However, I would like to suggest to its users
a working alternative that offer a similar service.
It is why I let it around. Any suggestion is welcome.
Best,
Jerome
On 30/08/2024 07:32, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Source: libpam-ssh
Severity: serious
Justifica
Source: laminar
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: sidremove
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing laminar from Debian for the following reasons:
* It accumulated one RC-bug:
+ #1019455: laminard: WebUI of laminar fails because newer
Source: openscap-daemon
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: sidremove
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing openscap-daemon from Debian for the following reasons:
* It accumulated one RC-bug:
+ #1035384: openscap-daemon: hardcoded dep
Source: mozillavpn
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: sidremove
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing mozillavpn from Debian for the following reasons:
* It accumulated 2 RC-bugs:
+ #1027506: mozillavpn: FTBFS: benchmarktaskdownload.
Source: matrix-sydent
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: sidremove
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing matrix-sydent from Debian for the following reasons:
* It accumulated 2 RC-bugs:
+ #1029442: matrix-sydent: modifies conffiles (
Hi Jerome,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 11:55:25AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> I agree with your analysis. However, I would like to suggest to its users
> a working alternative that offer a similar service.
> It is why I let it around. Any suggestion is welcome.
I am not aware of any alternative wit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1079010 ITP: gcc-14-doc: documentation for GNU compilers reassign
> 1079010 wnpp
Bug #1079010 [src:gcc-13-doc] gcc-13-doc: please create src:gcc-14-doc
Changed Bug title to 'ITP: gcc-14-doc: documentation for GNU compilers reassign
10790
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1079010 wnpp
Bug #1079010 [src:gcc-13-doc] ITP: gcc-14-doc: documentation for GNU compilers
Bug reassigned from package 'src:gcc-13-doc' to 'wnpp'.
No longer marked as found in versions gcc-13-doc/13.2.0-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1079010 ITP: gcc-14-doc: documentation for GNU compilers
Bug #1079010 [src:gcc-13-doc] ITP: gcc-14-doc: documentation for GNU compilers
reassign 1079010 wnpp
Changed Bug title to 'ITP: gcc-14-doc: documentation for GNU compilers' from
'I
Adding -mno-unaligned-access to MESON_ARM_*_FLAGS fixes the
tests failure with a more recent qemu.
From the comments at https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2542
it looks like the only prob here is that the testsuite (which is designed
to run without any OS whatsoever, just as a bootload
Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2024 11:19:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1080049: fixed in casacore 3.6.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1080049,
regarding 15 packages from casacore have an undeclared file conflict
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1076467 [src:pytest-mpi] pytest-mpi: autpkgtest regression with mpich as
default provider on 32 bit architectures
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1076467: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076467
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow.
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1076467 in pytest-mpi reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pytest-mpi/-/commit/dd87206b9317c
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1079765 [src:ros2-colcon-core] setuptools test command is removed
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1079765: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079765
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1079765 in ros2-colcon-core reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/robotics-team/ros2-colcon-core/-/commit/ca3c49e6
Hi all,
I planned to fix this bug by just updating the copyright file first.
And let the package re-introduce to testing.
And then I'll upgrade to latest upstream version.
So that we can repack the source tarball and remove those unwanted stuff.
Currently nunit is not used at all. There is a pa
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1053015 + trixie sid
Bug #1053015 [src:cava] cava: FTBFS with OpenJDK 21 due to new compiler warnings
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1078338 + trixie sid
Bug #1078338 [src:cuneiform] cuneiform: FTBFS with GCC 14: error: type defaults
to
Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2024 12:07:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1079765: fixed in ros2-colcon-core 0.17.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1079765,
regarding setuptools test command is removed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2024 12:07:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076467: fixed in pytest-mpi 0.6-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1076467,
regarding pytest-mpi: autpkgtest regression with mpich as default provider on
32 bit architectures
to be marked as done.
This mean
Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2024 12:19:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053554: fixed in cecil 0.9.5+dfsg-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053554,
regarding cecil: Missing licenses/copyright in debian/copyright
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2024 12:35:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1079758: fixed in scikit-build 0.18.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1079758,
regarding setuptools test command is removed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2024 13:00:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1002106: fixed in gr-dab 0.4-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002106,
regarding gr-dab: FTBFS: ./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp/src.c:11:
undefined reference to `pthread_create'
to be marked as
Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2024 13:00:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1031346: fixed in gr-dab 0.4-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1031346,
regarding gr-dab not installable due to dependency on outdated gnuradio 3.8
(current is 3.10)
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2024 13:21:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1078478: fixed in paje.app 1.98-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1078478,
regarding paje.app: FTBFS: paje.app: move failed: at /usr/bin/gsdh_gnustep
line 365.
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
On 8/28/24 5:07 PM, Bastian Germann wrote:
Please ask for unarr removal.
Yes, please remove unarr from the archive.
It was packaged as a dependency of opencpn, but it no longer uses it.
The maintainer also never touched the package again after it was first uploaded.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
G
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1073438 in gtkmm-documentation reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gtkmm-documentation/-/commit/11e63
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1073438 [src:gtkmm-documentation] gtkmm-documentation: FTBFS: make: ***
[debian/rules:4: build] Error 25
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1073438: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073438
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.d
Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2024 15:11:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075623: fixed in virtuoso-opensource 7.2.12+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075623,
regarding virtuoso-opensource: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2024 15:11:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075623: fixed in virtuoso-opensource 7.2.12+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075623,
regarding virtuoso-opensource: FTBFS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2024 15:19:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052576: fixed in clj-yaml-clojure 0.7.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052576,
regarding clj-yaml-clojure: FTBFS with OpenJDK 21 due to unsupported javac
source/target level 7
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2024 15:35:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1073438: fixed in gtkmm-documentation 4.10.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1073438,
regarding gtkmm-documentation: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:4: build] Error 25
to be marked as done.
This means that
Not that I am aware of - I submitted quite a few fixing similar issues when
GCC was upgraded but only a handful were taken up, I think there are still
a whole bunch that were not applied ... :shrug
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 7:17 AM Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Is there something wrong with this pa
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2024.20240829-1
Severity: serious
There was a hiccup in today's upgrade:
,
| Vorbereitung zum Entpacken von .../10-texlive-base_2024.20240829-1_all.deb ...
| Entpacken von texlive-base (2024.20240829-1) über (2024.20240706-1) ...
| dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten d
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:gambas3
Bug #1080098 [ftp.debian.org] RM: gambas3 [armel] -- ROM; does not build with
gcc nor clang
Added indication that 1080098 affects src:gambas3
> block 1079078 by -1
Bug #1079078 [src:gambas3] gambas3: FTBFS on armel:
/usr/include/poppler/goo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1053015 0.6.0-1.1
Bug #1053015 [src:cava] cava: FTBFS with OpenJDK 21 due to new compiler warnings
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1053015 to the same values
previously set
> tags 1078338 + ftbfs
Bug #1078338 [src:cuneiform
Package: src:datalad-container
Version: 1.2.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with p
Package: src:dbus-deviation
Version: 0.6.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --buildsyst
Package: src:django-guardian
Version: 2.4.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with p
Package: src:ephoto
Version: 1.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
dh_update_autoto
Package: src:e17
Version: 0.26.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update_autoto
Package: src:factory-boy
Version: 2.11.1-8
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --buildsystem
Package: src:fcitx5-m17n
Version: 5.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update
Package: src:gcc-avr
Version: 1:7.3.0+Atmel3.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh_testdir
AU
Package: src:flake8-quotes
Version: 3.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --buildsys
Package: src:gmime
Version: 3.2.14+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with=gir
Package: src:jupyter-packaging
Version: 0.12.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --wit
Package: src:gstreamermm-1.0
Version: 1.10.0+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --
Package: src:keepass2
Version: 2.57+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with=cli
Package: src:lomiri-online-accounts
Version: 0.14-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:magic-wormhole
Version: 0.14.0-0.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with p
Package: src:manuel
Version: 1.12.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with python3,s
Package: src:nauty
Version: 2.8.8+ds-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update_au
Package: src:netavark
Version: 1.9.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --buildsystem c
Package: src:ocaml-merlin
Version: 5.1-502+ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:ovn
Version: 24.03.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with autoreconf,
Package: src:pdb-tools
Version: 2.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --buildsystem
Package: src:pycollada
Version: 0.7.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --buildsystem=py
Package: src:powerline
Version: 2.8.3-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with sphinxd
Package: src:pyfastx
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --buildsystem py
Package: src:python-applicationinsights
Version: 0.11.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh bi
Package: src:pyramid-jinja2
Version: 2.7+dfsg-1.3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with
Package: src:python-ciso8601
Version: 2.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with p
Package: src:python-django-bootstrap-form
Version: 3.4-8
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh bina
Package: src:python-bitcoinlib
Version: 0.11.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --wit
Package: src:python-funcsigs
Version: 1.0.2-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh /usr/share/opens
Package: src:python-isc-dhcp-leases
Version: 0.10.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:python-josepy
Version: 1.14.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with py
Package: src:python-libusb1
Version: 2.0.1+ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with p
Package: src:python-libais
Version: 0.17+git.20190917.master.e464cf8-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules
Package: src:python-ofxhome
Version: 0.3.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with pyth
Package: src:pyzbar
Version: 0.1.9-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with python3 --
Package: src:rl-accel
Version: 0.9.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
dpkg-buildpackage: info: host architecture amd
Package: src:sshguard
Version: 2.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update_au
Package: src:sogo
Version: 5.11.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update_autot
Package: src:terminology
Version: 1.13.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_updat
Package: src:tryton-server
Version: 6.0.49-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
/usr/lib/python3/di
Package: src:urfkill
Version: 0.5.0-7.2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with autorecon
Package: src:zope.i18nmessageid
Version: 6.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --bui
Package: src:xbyak
Version: 7.05-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --buildsystem=meson
Package: src:kannel
Version: 1.4.5-17
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update_aut
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.10.6-1
Severity: grave
File: /usr/lib/modules/6.10.6-amd64/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: c...@aptivi.anonaddy.com
I've just installed Debian Trixie Testing daily build from this page:
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdi
I took a look at this package and was able to fix the two test_get
errors with
debian/patches/0018-replace-assert-dict-contains-subset.patch
I tried to fix test_connections, but am stumped. it seems like upstream
is having problems with versions of tornado and pyzmq, and it really
seemed like the
I have uploaded the NMU with the debdiff attached.
paje.app_1.98-1.2.debdiff
Description: Binary data
I would like to add that booting the same kernel with `nomodeset` no longer
caused the black screen.
Hi Santiago, thanks for the report.
I found out about the failure yesterday, but it'd be nice to know which package
update in unstable broke xbyak's tests, so that I can debug the issue quicker.
The issue does not appear yet on Testing.
Thanks!
(sorry for the crappy email - I'm on my phone)
I
El 30/8/24 a las 20:07, Andrea Pappacoda escribió:
The issue does not appear yet on Testing.
It happens in testing already:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rbuild/trixie/i386/xbyak_7.05-1.rbuild.log.gz
(I've also triggered a rebuild for amd64, where I would expect it to fail as
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1080124 in pyfastx reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/pyfastx/-/commit/0f6199cfbfd243687deddadaadec80f
Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2024 18:32:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1078234: fixed in llvm-toolchain-19 1:19.1.0~++rc3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1078234,
regarding libllvm-19-ocaml-dev: Missing OCaml Depends+Provides
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1080124 [src:pyfastx] pyfastx: FTBFS: ERROR: test_module
(tests.test_fasta.FastaTest.test_module)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1080124: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1080124
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1076289 https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/issues/7425
Bug #1076289 [src:skimage] skimage FTBFS on mips64el: test failures
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/issues/7425'.
>
End of me
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
