Source: pyaxmlparser
Version: 0.3.24-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.3.26-1
Tags: sid bookworm pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more th
Processing control commands:
> close -1 0.3.26-1
Bug #1001120 [src:pyaxmlparser] src:pyaxmlparser: fails to migrate to testing
for too long: uploader built arch:all binaries
Marked as fixed in versions pyaxmlparser/0.3.26-1.
Bug #1001120 [src:pyaxmlparser] src:pyaxmlparser: fails to migrate to te
On 12/4/21 2:51 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
Source: pyaxmlparser
Version: 0.3.24-1
[...]
Your package is only blocked because the arch:all binary package(s)
aren't built on a buildd. Unfortunately the Debian infrastructure
doesn't allow arch:all packages to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I
will
Source: httpbin
Version: 0.5.0+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.7.0+dfsg-1
Tags: sid bookworm
X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Processing control commands:
> close -1 0.7.0+dfsg-1
Bug #1001121 [src:httpbin] src:httpbin: fails to migrate to testing for too
long: autopkgtest failures
Marked as fixed in versions httpbin/0.7.0+dfsg-1.
Bug #1001121 [src:httpbin] src:httpbin: fails to migrate to testing for too
long: autopkgt
Source: growlight
Version: 1.2.35-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.2.37-2
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 997845
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and uns
Processing control commands:
> close -1 1.2.37-2
Bug #1001122 [src:growlight] src:growlight: fails to migrate to testing for too
long: autopkgtest regression
Marked as fixed in versions growlight/1.2.37-2.
Bug #1001122 [src:growlight] src:growlight: fails to migrate to testing for too
long: auto
Thanks. I actually just cut growlight 1.2.38 literally forty
minutes ago, and have prepared it for upload. Unfortunately,
it's dependent on the new libnotcurses3, which needs to get
through NEW. I'm not yet a DD, so I'm hoping my Application
Manager will be willing to sponsor an upload of notcurses
Hi Nick
On 04-12-2021 21:29, nick black wrote:
Thanks. I actually just cut growlight 1.2.38 literally forty
minutes ago, and have prepared it for upload.
Great timing. :)
Unfortunately,
it's dependent on the new libnotcurses3, which needs to get
through NEW. I'm not yet a DD, so I'm hoping m
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #998008 [libc-bin] libc-bin: postinst makes a working NIS system not to
work anymore at every point release
Added tag(s) pending.
--
998008: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998008
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.d
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #998008 in glibc reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/glibc-team/glibc/-/commit/f0b32b609c442083a8af7099ca58fbd74b
Hi
On 04-12-2021 20:55, Andres Salomon wrote:
Please cancel that upload, I will do a new upload.
Done.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On Thu, 02 Dec 2021 13:44:15 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
The last couple of days, two of the ci.debian.net arm64 workers became
unresponsive. The systems were rebooted and I found the message in
the journal pasted below.
Please let me know if you need more info about these systems.
As reque
Your message dated Sat, 04 Dec 2021 21:53:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1000798: fixed in vde2 2.3.2+r586-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1000798,
regarding vdeplug4: Provides the same binary package as another source package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Sat, 04 Dec 2021 21:53:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1000798: fixed in vde2 2.3.2+r586-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1000798,
regarding vde2: Provides the same binary package as another source package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
As this problem exists upstream, I
have submitted an upstream bug
report.
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.p
hp?61620
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 987008 upstream
Bug #987008 [grub2] Grub fails to find LVM volume after previous LV rename
Added tag(s) upstream.
> found 987008 2.06-2
Bug #987008 [grub2] Grub fails to find LVM volume after previous LV rename
Marked as found in versions gru
Joachim:
> I'm aware of that. And "shortly" definitely means "before the
> autoremoval" (which is currently scheduled for 2022-01-01).
The real deadline is when I ought to take action myself, as someone
adversely affected by an RC bug.
The timeline for fixing this is:
NMU DELAYED-10 upload of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 987008 https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?61620
Bug #987008 [grub2] Grub fails to find LVM volume after previous LV rename
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?61620'.
>
End of message, stopping p
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.15.5-1
Severity: critical
Tags: upstream
Justification: breaks the whole system
X-Debbugs-Cc: tipos...@tiscali.it
Dear Maintainer,
Basically the latest kernel has serious GPU issues.
It takes several minutes to open sddm, and then the video is all broken and
I can't
Your message dated Sat, 04 Dec 2021 23:49:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#998488: fixed in facterdb 1.12.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #998488,
regarding facterdb: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: cannot load such
file -- libfacter.so
to be marked as done.
This means t
Hi!
On Sat, 2021-12-04 at 23:09:19 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Joachim:
> > I'm aware of that. And "shortly" definitely means "before the
> > autoremoval" (which is currently scheduled for 2022-01-01).
>
> The real deadline is when I ought to take action myself, as someone
> adversely affected by
Package: puppet
Version: 5.5.22-2
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
The version is not ruby 3.0 compatible:
ruby3.0 -e "require 'puppet'"
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/puppet/util.rb:469:in `uri_encode': undefined method
`escape' for URI:Module (NoMethodError)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 998494 with 1001129
Bug #998494 [src:ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper] ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper:
FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: cannot load such file -- libfacter.so
998494 was blocked by: 984082 998481 984116
998494 was not blocking an
Your message dated Sun, 05 Dec 2021 01:19:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1001129: fixed in puppet 5.5.22-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1001129,
regarding Ruby 3.0: puppet/util.rb:469:in `uri_encode': undefined method
`escape' for URI:Module (NoMethodError)
to be marked as d
On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 15:06:50 -0400 Andres Salomon wrote:
> Stable (bullseye) still contains chromium 90, which has had many
> security issues. Testing & unstable contain 93, and stable should really
> be quickly updated via stable-security to at least chromium 93 (as its
> already been packaged an
Your message dated Sun, 05 Dec 2021 03:19:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1001097: fixed in ksh93u+m 1.0.0~beta.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1001097,
regarding ksh93u+m_1.0.0~beta.1-2_all-buildd.changes REJECTED
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Source: openvdb
Version: 9.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=openvdb&ver=9.0.0-3
...
debian/rules override_dh_install-arch
make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
LD_PRELOAD= LD_LIBRARY_PATH=./debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu help2man
--version-str
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #998509 in ruby-rspec-puppet reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-rspec-puppet/-/commit/81b88ac3fe3
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #998509 [src:ruby-rspec-puppet] ruby-rspec-puppet: FTBFS: ERROR: Test
"ruby3.0" failed: cannot load such file -- libfacter.so
Added tag(s) pending.
--
998509: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998509
Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Dec 2021 04:18:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#994119: fixed in vdirsyncer 0.18.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #994119,
regarding vdirsyncer: Random cannot import name 'metasync' with python3.9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 05 Dec 2021 04:18:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#997497: fixed in vdirsyncer 0.18.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #997497,
regarding vdirsyncer: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest
-i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13
to
Hi,
Lucas Nussbaum (2021-10-23):
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > dpkg-buildpackage
> > -
> >
> > dh_auto_test: error: cd _build && go test -vet=off -v -p 4
> > github.com/AlecAivazis/surve
Processing control commands:
> tag 995387 pending
Bug #995387 [dpkg] dpkg: remove-on-upgrade deletes symlink targets owned by
another package
Added tag(s) pending.
--
995387: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995387
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with p
Control: tag 995387 pending
Hi!
Bug #995387 in package dpkg reported by you has been fixed in
the dpkg/dpkg.git Git repository. You can see the changelog below, and
you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/diff/?id=20e181fc2
---
dpkg: Fix conffile remova
Your message dated Sun, 05 Dec 2021 07:48:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966980: fixed in mochiweb 2.22.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #966980,
regarding mochiweb: FTBFS: beam/beam_load.c(1621): Error loading module
rebar_utils: please re-compile this module with an 23 compil
Your message dated Sat, 04 Dec 2021 08:48:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#997486: fixed in pycoast 1.5.0+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #997486,
regarding pycoast: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i
python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13
to be
Source: ksh93u+m
Version: 1.0.0~beta.1-2
Severity: serious
On 2021-12-03 18:48, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>
>
> Version check failed:
> Your upload included the binary package ksh, version 20210511, for all,
> however unstable already has version 20210511.
> Uploads to unstable must have a highe
Your message dated Sat, 04 Dec 2021 09:48:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1000318: fixed in docker.io 20.10.11+dfsg1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1000318,
regarding docker.io: FTBFS on mipsen: FAIL: profiles/seccomp
TestUnmarshalDefaultProfile
to be marked as done.
This mean
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #999533 [src:matplotlib] matplotlib: python3-pil.imagetk should be Depends
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
999533: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=999533
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
Hi Aruelien
On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 10:39:58AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Source: ksh93u+m
> Version: 1.0.0~beta.1-2
> Severity: serious
>
> On 2021-12-03 18:48, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> > Version check failed:
> > Your upload included the binary package ksh, version 20210511, for all,
> >
Hello!
On Пт, 2021-12-03 at 19:44 +, piorunz wrote:
> Testing has got 3.1.1. I hope bullseye-backports can update it? CC to
> maintainer, Nicholas Guriev! Thanks in advance.
I have uploaded this version to Backports. It is already available on
mirrors and should work okay.
https://ftp.debian.
Hi Nicholas,
That's fantastic, everything works ok now! Thank you!
I set up new Firefox profile with Telegram tab just in case, put that in
place of old Telegram window, that worked for me for a day, but now I am
back to using telegram desktop app. Great work:)
On 04/12/2021 10:45, Nicholas Gur
Hi Nicholas,
I can second that, everything is fine now! Thank you for the quick reaction!
Just to have it documented somewhere, in one of the out-of-date versions
I had to click the [Ok] button in the message box multiple times to
activate the window after having been away for some time. I assume
Source: darkradiant
Version: 2.14.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=darkradiant&ver=2.14.0-1
...
/<>/radiantcore/model/import/openfbx/ofbx.h:21:27: error: static
assertion failed: u64 is not 8 bytes
21 | static_assert(sizeof(u64) == 8, "u64 is not
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #999680 [src:criu] criu: FTBFS on armhf: cc1: error: '-mfloat-abi=hard':
selected architecture lacks an FPU
Added tag(s) pending.
--
999680: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=999680
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.d
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #999680 in criu reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/criu/-/commit/55d4dc414e6542c69c4fae95d31160256d726013
Source: ocaml-flac
Version: 0.2.0.1~really0.1.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=ocaml-flac&ver=0.2.0.1~really0.1.7-1%2Bb1
...
ocamlc.opt -c -g -w +A-4@5-7@8-9@11@12@20-35-44-45-50 -thread -I
/usr/lib/ocaml/bytes -I /usr/lib/ocaml -I /usr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1001110 + pending
Bug #1001110 [src:darkradiant] darkradiant FTBFS on 32bit: u64 is not 8 bytes
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1001110: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1001113 + experimental
Bug #1001113 [src:ocaml-flac] ocaml-flac FTBFS: Error: Unbound module
Ogg_demuxer
Added tag(s) experimental.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1001113: https://bugs.debia
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1001110 + upstream
Bug #1001110 [src:darkradiant] darkradiant FTBFS on 32bit: u64 is not 8 bytes
Added tag(s) upstream.
> forwarded 1001110 https://github.com/codereader/DarkRadiant/pull/26
Bug #1001110 [src:darkradiant] darkradiant FTBFS on
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 997176 libpq-dev 14~beta1-1
Bug #997176 {Done: Christoph Berg } [src:pgmodeler] pgmodeler:
FTBFS: Project ERROR: libpq development package not found
Bug reassigned from package 'src:pgmodeler' to 'libpq-dev'.
No longer marked as found in
telegram-cli was also outdated and may remain so if no longer supported.
On Sat, 4 Dec 2021, Ralf Neubauer wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
>
> I can second that, everything is fine now! Thank you for the quick reaction!
>
> Just to have it documented somewhere, in one of the out-of-date versions
> I had t
Your message dated Sat, 04 Dec 2021 14:34:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#999680: fixed in criu 3.16.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #999680,
regarding criu: FTBFS on armhf: cc1: error: '-mfloat-abi=hard': selected
architecture lacks an FPU
to be marked as done.
This means tha
On 2021-12-04 16:15, Anuradha Weeraman wrote:
> Hi Aruelien
>
> On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 10:39:58AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Source: ksh93u+m
> > Version: 1.0.0~beta.1-2
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > On 2021-12-03 18:48, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> > > Version check failed:
> > > Your uplo
Your message dated Sat, 04 Dec 2021 14:48:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1001110: fixed in darkradiant 2.14.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1001110,
regarding darkradiant FTBFS on 32bit: u64 is not 8 bytes
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Dear Python team,
Would you have any hint on this?
Is it a bug with the python3 package itself?
Let me know.
Regards,
Nilesh
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 12:02:59 +0530 Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:35:40 +0100 Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Am Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:36:33PM +0530 schrieb Nil
Processing control commands:
> tags 984154 + patch
Bug #984154 [src:gnome-chemistry-utils] gnome-chemistry-utils: ftbfs with GCC-11
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 984154 + pending
Bug #984154 [src:gnome-chemistry-utils] gnome-chemistry-utils: ftbfs with GCC-11
Added tag(s) pending.
--
984154: https:
Control: tags 984154 + patch
Control: tags 984154 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for gnome-chemistry-utils (versioned as 0.14.17-6.1)
and uploaded it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should
cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru gnome-chemistry-utils-0.14.17/debian/chang
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1000812 with 1000742
Bug #1000812 [python3-pyrle] pyrle: import fails on Python 3.10
1000812 was not blocked by any bugs.
1000812 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1000812: 1000742
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Hi Nilesh (2021.12.04_15:15:05_+)
> Would you have any hint on this?
> Is it a bug with the python3 package itself?
You're waiting for python3-tabulate to be patched for Python 3.10
support.
I added a bug blocking link.
SR
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1000742 serious
Bug #1000742 [python3-tabulate] ImportError: cannot import name 'Iterable' from
'collections'
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
10
Hi,
On 24/11/21 12:53, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Source: boost1.71
Version: 1.71.0-7+b3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=boost1.71&ver=1.71.0-7%2Bb3
...
libs/python/src/exec.cpp:109:14: error: ‘_Py_fopen’ was not declared in this
scope; did you mean ‘_Py_wf
Hi,
On 22/11/2021 09:16, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I analysed the problem in:
https://github.com/PhilipHazel/pcre2/issues/56
Thanks! I've had a read of that, and AIUI it's a behaviour change
(matching that of perl) rather than an ABI change?
I guess bumping the version in the symbols file like
Hi Stefano,
On 12/4/21 9:00 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
Hi Nilesh (2021.12.04_15:15:05_+)
Would you have any hint on this?
Is it a bug with the python3 package itself?
You're waiting for python3-tabulate to be patched for Python 3.10
support.
Indeed. I was just being silly as it seems. I
Your message dated Sat, 04 Dec 2021 16:35:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1000742: fixed in python-tabulate 0.8.7-0.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1000742,
regarding ImportError: cannot import name 'Iterable' from 'collections'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -pending
Bug #984268 [src:ogmtools] ogmtools: ftbfs with GCC-11
Removed tag(s) pending.
--
984268: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984268
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 -pending
On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 17:02:49 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: tags 984268 + patch
> Control: tags 984268 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for ogmtools (versioned as 1:1.5-4.1) and uploaded
> it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I
Control: tags -1 pending
I'm doing a (team-)upload soon(tm)
Thanks Bret for working on this!
--
tobi
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #984275 [src:openmw] openmw: ftbfs with GCC-11
Added tag(s) pending.
--
984275: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984275
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: block -1 by 913828
Dang, I did not realize that this needs recastnavigation. It is currently
sitting in NEW
The current repository on salsa will build with recastnavigation, so all we
can do is wait...
Bret: Make sure to pull. I'd pushed a few commits fixing this and that.
--
tobi
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 913828
Bug #984275 [src:openmw] openmw: ftbfs with GCC-11
984275 was not blocked by any bugs.
984275 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 984275: 913828
--
984275: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984275
Debian Bug Tracki
Hi Bret,
> * MyGUI 3.4 being uploaded to Debian:
> https://salsa.debian.org/psi29a-guest/MyGUI
Can you expand on the status on myGui?
AFAICT there is no RFS at the moment, however, there is a patch
on the BTS claiming to fix the FTBFS? Is there something actionable where I
could help?
--
tobi
Dear Sandro,
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 11:49:52 -0500 Sandro Tosi wrote:
control: severity -1 normal
> > This is not a bug in cartopy, matplotlib tries to use ImageTk but the
> > package is not installed.
> >
> > python3-matplotlib only Recommends python3-pil.imagetk, this should be a
> > Depends.
>
Your message dated Sat, 04 Dec 2021 18:04:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1000812: fixed in pyrle 0.0.33-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1000812,
regarding pyrle: import fails on Python 3.10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 04 Dec 2021 18:04:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#997347: fixed in python-formencode 2.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #997347,
regarding python-formencode: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test
--test-nose -i python{version} -p 3.9 --test-nose re
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 993324 2.7.1+dfsg-1
Bug #993324 {Done: Dirk Eddelbuettel } [libgsl25] libgsl25:
ABI breakage: removed symbol gsl_linalg_QR_TR_decomp
There is no source info for the package 'libgsl25' at version '2.7.1+dfsg-1'
with architecture ''
Unable t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfixed 993324 2.7.1+dfsg-1
Bug #993324 {Done: Dirk Eddelbuettel } [libgsl25] libgsl25:
ABI breakage: removed symbol gsl_linalg_QR_TR_decomp
There is no source info for the package 'libgsl25' at version '2.7.1+dfsg-1'
with architecture ''
Unabl
Your message dated Sat, 04 Dec 2021 19:00:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#947540: fixed in stardict 3.0.7+git20210701.96b96d8+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #947540,
regarding stardict: build-depends on deprecated gnome-doc-utils
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
79 matches
Mail list logo
