Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #918562 in camomile reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/camomile/commit/2e040041e98c4f8b70e5e28915bf5c
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #918563 [src:camomile] camomile FTBFS on ppc64{,el}: camomilelocaledef got
signal SEGV
Bug #919472 [src:camomile] camomile ftbfs on ppc64el
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
918563: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #918563 in camomile reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/camomile/commit/2e040041e98c4f8b70e5e28915bf5c
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #918562 [src:camomile] camomile FTBFS on ocaml bytecode architectures:
Fatal error: exception Stack overflow
Added tag(s) pending.
--
918562: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=918562
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.
so this is not an openjdk error, and should be fixed in the pacakges itself. See
8211916: Javadoc -link makes broken links if module name matches package name
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk11u/rev/66a53d6047d1
see the -source 8 passed in the tests.
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2019 08:42:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#919763: fixed in adios 1.13.1-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #919763,
regarding adios: armhf FTBFS when built on arm64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:04:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#919727: fixed in cmtk 3.3.1p1+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #919727,
regarding cmtk FTBFS in unstable, presumablly due to the new dcmtk
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Control: retitle -1 mlpy: FTBFS: Needs build-dep on latexmk, pngmath replaced
with imgmath
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:26:45PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> mlpy fails to build with Sphinx 1.6, currently available in experimental:
>
> PYTHONPATH=/<>/build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7 /usr/bin/make -C
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 mlpy: FTBFS: Needs build-dep on latexmk, pngmath replaced with
> imgmath
Bug #872234 [src:mlpy] mlpy: FTBFS with Sphinx 1.6: Needs build-dep on latexmk
Changed Bug title to 'mlpy: FTBFS: Needs build-dep on latexmk, pngmath replaced
with imgmath' from 'ml
Hi Jonathan (cc Jeremy and the bugreport),
Quoting Jonathan McCrohan (2019-01-25 02:02:37)
> Jeremy, Jonas,
>
> Please accept my apologies for the tardy response on this. I've been afk
> for a couple of months due to life events.
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 07:28:55PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 08:09:39PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Interestingly 3.4.21 build fine in unstable on arm64 only two days ago (see
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/developers-reference.html
> )
>
> Matching this, builds of 3.4.21 still build fine today. (also see th
Package: sogo
Version: 4.0.5-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I’ve just upgraded (and due to reasons entirely my fault, I’ve realised I have
no downgrade path… backup fail) from 3.2.6 (I believe it was) to 4.0.5.
It’s a Debian box, using the “official D
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:39:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#915345: fixed in roaraudio 1.0~beta12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #915345,
regarding mpd: FTBFS ('_IO_off64_t' has not been declared)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:39:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#915345: fixed in roaraudio 1.0~beta12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #915345,
regarding roaraudio FTBFS with glibc 2.28
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:52:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#920399: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #909026,
regarding nethack-el: fails to run with nethack 3.6.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 919599
Bug #910295 [dput] dput: FTBFS: tests fail to mock HTTP request
Bug #920019 [dput] dput fails to build on test errors
910295 was blocked by: 919599
910295 was not blocking any bugs.
Ignoring request to alter blocking bugs of bug #910295 to the same
Control: block -1 by 919599
On 18-Jan-2019, Ben Finney wrote:
> The HTTPretty library is failing to correctly mock requests sent
> using the standard-library `http.client.HTTPConnection` class.
I have reported bug#919599 for this. (I believe that bug is already
fixed in Debian now.)
--
\
This issues is raised upstream as
https://github.com/jorisroovers/gitlint/issues/78
and looks like it might be fixed in more recent versions.
It would good to update gitlint to 0.10.0 from the current 0.9.0 and see if
this fixes the issue, and then migrate from Debian Unstable to Testing.
Am 24.01.19 um 23:51 schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner:
>
> I can get some of this compiling with openjdk-11, but not all.
>
> Ok, here's a fun problem: looks like I can build android-platform-23
> with java11, but since it is in effect building Java core classes, the
> compiler freaks.
>
> There s
Source: rhnlib
Severity: serious
If nobody complains, I'll file a RoM removal bug soon.
So lets keep it out of Buster for now.
--
Debian New Maintainer Frontdesk
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 libequinox-osgi-java
Bug #891957 [netbeans] netbeans no starting "loading module" modules.netbinox
NullPointerException
Bug reassigned from package 'netbeans' to 'libequinox-osgi-java'.
No longer marked as found in versions netbeans/8.1+dfsg3-4 and
netb
Control: reassign -1 libequinox-osgi-java
Control: found -1 3.9.1-1
This issue is actually caused by missing files in libequionx-osgi-java.
The sources from Maven did neither contain the *.profile nor .properties
files which caused a NullPointerException in Netbeans and made the
program unusable.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 920046 + sid buster
Bug #920046 [src:ruby-diaspora-federation] ruby-diaspora-federation:
build-depends on ruby-faraday (< 0.10~)
Added tag(s) sid and buster.
> found 920369 1.62.0+dfsg-10
Bug #920369 [src:boost1.62] boost1.62: do not releas
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:19:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#915279: fixed in golang-github-nats-io-gnatsd
1.3.0+git20181112.3c52dc8-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #915279,
regarding golang-github-nats-io-gnatsd FTBFS: cannot find package
"github.com/nats-io/jwt"
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:19:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#891957: fixed in libequinox-osgi-java 3.9.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #891957,
regarding netbeans no starting "loading module" modules.netbinox
NullPointerException
to be marked as done.
This means t
> I believe the only chance to save this package in time for Buster is to use
> OpenJDK 8.
That seems to be a reasonable choice. Right now Android apps are simply not
supposed to use Java 9+.
But for how long will JDK8 be supported in Debian? I don't want this package be
a burden of any future
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source zapping
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'zapping'
Limit currently set to 'source':'zapping'
> tags 919473 + pending
Bug #919473 [zapping] zapping: Settings schema
'net.sf.Zapping.plugins.teletext' doe
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:55:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#916715: fixed in toulbar2 1.0.0+dfsg3-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #916715,
regarding toulbar2: missing build dependency on zlib1g-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Am 25.01.19 um 13:23 schrieb seam...@debian.org:
>> I believe the only chance to save this package in time for Buster is to use
>> OpenJDK 8.
>
> That seems to be a reasonable choice. Right now Android apps are simply not
> supposed to use Java 9+.
>
> But for how long will JDK8 be supported in
Package: libcaca
Version: 0.99.beta19-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
See:
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/libcaca/0.99.beta19-2/buildlog
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #920230 [capnproto] capnproto: executable installed in directory which
breaks rdeps
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
920230: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=920230
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.de
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 919773 https://github.com/DBD-SQLite/DBD-SQLite/issues/45
Bug #919773 [src:libdbd-sqlite3-perl] libdbd-sqlite3-perl FTBFS on mips: test
failure
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/DBD-SQLite/DBD-SQLite/issues/45'.
> tha
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 -ftbfs
Bug #888130 [src:ruby-net-http-persistent] ruby-net-http-persistent: FTBFS on
ruby2.5: ssl verification fails
Removed tag(s) ftbfs.
> severity -1 normal
Bug #888130 [src:ruby-net-http-persistent] ruby-net-http-persistent: FTBFS on
ruby2.5: ssl verific
Control: tag -1 -ftbfs
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tag -1 experimental
Hi,
This bug does not affect experimental, as the 3.x branch removed this
test (and the corresponding code).
The reuse functionality has been reported upstream to cause problems in
some situations in the 2.x branch. I
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 04:53:14AM +, Chris Knadle wrote:
> Package: mumble
> Version: 1.2.19-3
> Severity: important
> Tags: security fixed-upstream fixed-in-experimental
>
>
> It is currently possible to cause mumble-server to freeze and/or crash by
> sending specifically it crafted co
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 919249 mumble: CVE-2018-20743: instability and crash due to crafted
> message flooding
Bug #919249 {Done: Christopher Knadle } [mumble]
security issue: instability and crash due to crafted message flooding
Changed Bug title to 'mumble: C
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:23:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#857955: fixed in netbeans 10.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #857955,
regarding libnb-ide14-java: broken symlinks:
/usr/share/netbeans/ide14/modules/ext/*.jar
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 texlive-latex-recommended
Bug #920366 [developers-reference] developers-reference: ftbfs in sid, builds
fine in stable
Bug reassigned from package 'developers-reference' to
'texlive-latex-recommended'.
No longer marked as found in versions developers-re
control: reassign -1 texlive-latex-recommended
control: retitle -1 ftbfs causing regression in texlive-latex-recommended
control: affects -1 developers-reference
control: affects -1 logidee-tools
control: found -1 2018.20190122-1
thanks
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:54:45AM +0100, Wolfgang Schweer wr
Package: src:lighttpd
Version: 1.4.52-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package in sid but it failed:
[...]
debian/rules build-indep
dh build-indep --with autoreconf,systemd
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 886664 1.0.7-4
Bug #886664 {Done: Xavier Guimard } [src:node-d3-timer]
node-d3-timer FTBFS: test failure
Marked as found in versions node-d3-timer/1.0.7-4; no longer marked as fixed in
versions node-d3-timer/1.0.7-4 and reopened.
> thanks
found 886664 1.0.7-4
thanks
>[ Xavier Guimard ]
>* Remove timeout based tests (Closes: #886664)
Hi. Sorry for the reopening but this does not seem fixed:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/armhf/node-d3-timer.html
Thanks.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unmerge 919800 919801 919831 919874 919875 919876 919878 919883 919895 919968
> 920020
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> reassign 919798 src:antlr4
Bug #919798 [openjdk-11-jdk-headless] javadoc: The code being documented uses
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 920331 - a11y
Bug #920331 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [src:libreoffice]
uninstallable - arch-indep parts missing
Removed tag(s) a11y.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
920331: https://bugs.debian.o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unmerge 919800
Bug #919800 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules
but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module
Bug #919798 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules
but the packages d
Control: reopen -1
Control: tags -1 =
On 2019-01-25 08:51, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This seems to be a temporary problem, since piuparts log seems fine now:
> https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/pass/dicoweb_2.7-1.log
That logfile predates the bug report.
I can still reproduce it in my pi
Le 25/01/2019 à 17:39, Santiago Vila a écrit :
> found 886664 1.0.7-4
> thanks
>
>>[ Xavier Guimard ]
>>* Remove timeout based tests (Closes: #886664)
>
> Hi. Sorry for the reopening but this does not seem fixed:
>
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/armhf/node
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #915584 {Done: أحمد المحمودي } [dicoweb]
dicoweb: fails to install with python 3.7
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #915584 to the same values
previously set
> tags -1 =
Bug #915584 [dicoweb] dicoweb: fails to install with
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2019 18:30:36 +0100
with message-id <20190125173036.ge26...@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#919883: libreoffice arch all FTBFS, javadoc: error -
The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5/docs/api/ are
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2019 18:30:36 +0100
with message-id <20190125173036.ge26...@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#919883: libreoffice arch all FTBFS, javadoc: error -
The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5/docs/api/ are
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # the OpenJDK bug. Not filed against libreoffice. Was reassigned wrongly
> # to src:libreoffice
> reassign 919895 openjdk-11-jdk-headless
Bug #919895 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules
but the packages defined in …
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 06:32:47PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> @Holger: please reschedule sid/pass/dicoweb_2.7-1.log
done.
--
tschüß,
Holger
---
holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #913343 [jclic] jclic: please switch to libmariadb-java
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
913343: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=913343
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unmerge 920020
Bug #920020 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [src:libreoffice] javadoc:
The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the
unnamed module
Bug #919883 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [src:libreoffice] javadoc:
The code
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2019 18:30:36 +0100
with message-id <20190125173036.ge26...@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#919883: libreoffice arch all FTBFS, javadoc: error -
The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5/docs/api/ are
unmerge 920020
reopen 920020
notfixed 920020 1:6.1.5~rc1-1
reassign 920020 openjdk-11-jre-headless
thanks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 919883 919968
Bug #919883 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [src:libreoffice] javadoc:
The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the
unnamed module
Bug #919968 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [src:libreoffice] javadoc:
Package: i2p
Version: 0.9.38-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#configuration-files
10.7.3:
Package: src:fw4spl
Version: 17.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid buster
fw4spl ftbfs in unstable
cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/fwMemory && /usr/bin/c++
-DBOOST_ALL_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_SPIRIT_USE_PHOENIX_V3
-DBOOST_THREAD_DONT_PROVIDE_DEPRECATED_FEATURES_SINCE_V3_0_0
-DBOOST_THREAD_PROVIDES_FUTURE -DB
Package: adios
Followup-For: Bug #919763
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu disco ubuntu-patch
Hi Alastair,
I'm reopening this bug report because I see that you have closed it by
disabling the testsuite.
This is a wrong fix for the issue given that the tests are correctl
Package: python3-twisted
Version: 17.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
When using python3-twisted from backports (18.7.0-2~bpo9+1), I get
the following error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/runpy.py", line 193, in _run_module_as_main
"__main__", mod_spec)
File "/usr
Quoting Xavier (2019-01-25 18:14:38)
> Le 25/01/2019 à 17:39, Santiago Vila a écrit :
> > found 886664 1.0.7-4
> > thanks
> >
> >>[ Xavier Guimard ]
> >>* Remove timeout based tests (Closes: #886664)
> >
> > Hi. Sorry for the reopening but this does not seem fixed:
> >
> > https://tests.
Looks like this is caused by texlive-base (2018.20190122-1), reverting to
texlive-base (2018.20181214-1) fixes the FTBFS.
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2019 18:22:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#915476: fixed in ledmon 0.90-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #915476,
regarding ledmon FTBFS with glibc 2.28
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 919976 11.0.103-2
Bug #919976 [ibus-keyman] ibus-keyman: fails to install: ibus-keyman.postinst:
ps: not found
Marked as found in versions ibus-keyman/11.0.103-2.
> found 919973 1.11.1+dfsg-3
Bug #919973 [netdata] netdata: fails to install:
On 2019-01-25 13:22, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
Looks like this is caused by texlive-base (2018.20190122-1), reverting
to
texlive-base (2018.20181214-1) fixes the FTBFS.
control: retitle -1 RM: golang-1.10 -- ROM; superseeded by golang-1.11
control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
control: severity -1 normal
Am 06.01.2019 um 21:11 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> Source: golang-1.10
> Severity: serious
>
> With golang-1.11 as default now, should golang-1.10
> be shipped in bust
Package: src:toulbar2
Version: 1.0.0+dfsg3-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid buster
toulbar2 ftbfs in unstable
[...]
*geometry* driver: auto-detecting
*geometry* detected driver: pdftex
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/hyperref/nameref.sty
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/oberdiek
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 891957 netbeans
Bug #891957 {Done: Markus Koschany } [libequinox-osgi-java]
netbeans no starting "loading module" modules.netbinox NullPointerException
Added indication that 891957 affects netbeans
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Plea
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 RM: golang-1.10 -- ROM; superseeded by golang-1.11
Bug #918508 [src:golang-1.10] Should golang-1.10 be shpped in buster?
Changed Bug title to 'RM: golang-1.10 -- ROM; superseeded by golang-1.11' from
'Should golang-1.10 be shpped in buster?'.
> reassign -
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 919875 + buster sid
Bug #919875 [src:commons-csv] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules
but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module
Added tag(s) buster and sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 919800 + buster sid
Bug #919800 [src:jackson-databind] javadoc: The code being documented uses
modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module
Added tag(s) sid and buster.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 919876 + buster sid
Bug #919876 [src:java-string-similarity] javadoc: The code being documented
uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module
Added tag(s) buster and sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please cont
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 919798 + buster sid
Bug #919798 [src:antlr4] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but
the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module
Added tag(s) sid and buster.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 919878 + buster sid
Bug #919878 [src:servlet-api] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules
but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module
Added tag(s) buster and sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 919874 + buster sid
Bug #919874 [src:bsaf] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the
packages defined in … are in the unnamed module
Added tag(s) buster and sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 919831 + buster sid
Bug #919831 [src:libcds-moc-java] libcds-moc-java: FTBFS (The code being
documented uses packages in the unnamed module)
Added tag(s) sid and buster.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 919801 + buster sid
Bug #919801 [src:libgoogle-gson-java] javadoc: The code being documented uses
modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module
Added tag(s) buster and sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #919298 [libreoffice-mysql-connector] libreoffice-mysql-connector: fails to
upgrade from sid: dpkg-maintscript-helper errors out
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #919298 to the same tags previously set
--
919298: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #919298 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/commit/65b286
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 916873 920458
Bug #916873 [python-twisted-core] python-twisted-core: Incorrect versioned
dependency on python-attr
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #920458 is 'python3-twisted' not 'python-twisted-core'
Failed to forcibly merge
Hi Matthias,
on a number of packages, javadoc now fails, which is reported by a
number of bugs. Since you mentioned that this is not a bug in the JDK,
could you give a hint what the problem is? The error message is a bit
mystic, at least to me. And the openjdk commit also does not enlighten me.
I
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 02:30:43PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> Source: cuyo
> Severity: critical
>
> Pseudo-Bug to keep cuyo out fo testing so it does not end up in the next
> release.
You've seen the question in #916692?
> Bernhard R. Link
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promi
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2019 22:06:02 +0100
with message-id <35362f1b-5adb-9a38-4484-716477648...@bluegap.ch>
and subject line Re: courier-mta: symlink loop:
/usr/share/man/man1/dotforward.1 -> dotforward.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #877273,
regarding courier-mta: symlink loop: /usr/
Hi everyone,
it seems there are two issues here:
1- ftbfs logidee-tools
2- ftbfs developers-reference
ad 1-
FIrst of all, I cannot reproduce this error on sid, so with all packages
properly upgraded.
That means, I assume you have a mixed upgrade of packages where it
fails, is this correct?
If y
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2019 21:21:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#920448: fixed in lighttpd 1.4.52-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #920448,
regarding lighttpd: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 06:17:48AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> I will upload new packages that include the fontspec fixes, as well as
> tighter package coupling. This will fix 2- and most probably also 1-,
thank you for your quick feedback and fixing this!
--
tschüß,
Holger
--
[2019-01-23 12:41] Jonathan Nieder
> [...]
> > It is my fault. I dropped /var/lib/supervise directory in runit=2.1.2-4,
> > which was expected by git-daemon-run.
> >
> > Today runit packaging underwent quite a rework, and packages, providing
> > runscripts are encouraged to use dh_runit(1). It m
Hi Moritz,
That needs to be seriously considered. I am using this package
extensively. Do you any alternatives to it?
Yours,
Benda
Source: ngraph-gtk
Version: 6.08.00-1
Severity: serious
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu disco
Dear maintainers,
Since the upgrade to 6.08.00, ngraph-gtk has been failing its autopkgtests
in Ubuntu on 32-bit architectures (i386 and armhf):
[...]
autopkgtest [00:39:34]
Hi mips porters,
we have a test failure of libdbd-sqlite3-perl on mips only: #919773
and neither the perl team nor upstream [0] were successful so far.
Maybe someone with mips knowdledge could take a look?
Cheers,
gregor
[0] https://github.com/DBD-SQLite/DBD-SQLite/issues/45
--
.''`. https:/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 919763
Bug #919763 {Done: Alastair McKinstry } [src:adios]
adios: armhf FTBFS when built on arm64
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Package: mumble
Version: 1.3.0~git20190114.9fcc588+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: security fixed-upstream pending
A vulnerability has been discovered whereby a remote unauthenticated user
connected to the server can send a crafted packet to change the number of
allowed users in the root channel t
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #919390 in systemd reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/systemd-team/systemd/commit/3eea472b0c1c171f86c0cf5c6f4788
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #919390 [udev] udev: network interface gets ID_NET_NAME even when NAME has
been set by /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #919390 to the same tags previously set
--
919390: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #919390 in systemd reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/systemd-team/systemd/commit/ca9bf5fdd69e1f6bb137d905f90225
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #919390 [udev] udev: network interface gets ID_NET_NAME even when NAME has
been set by /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
Added tag(s) pending.
--
919390: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919390
Debian Bug Tracking System
Source: openhft-chronicle-wire
Version: 1.16.18-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Hi,
openhft-chronicle-wire/experimental recently started to FTBFS with these
errors:
C[1;31mERRORESC[m] Failed to execute goal
ESC[32morg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.8.
asepasrp3...@gmail.com
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 11:39:18PM -0500, Steve Tell wrote:
> I just got a version working with guile-2.2, although its off on a side
> development branch in my sourceforge tree at the moment:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/gwave/code/HEAD/tree/branches/no-ggp-branch/
> [...]
> Anyway, I expec
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
