On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 11:26:33 +0200 Maximiliano Curia
wrote:
> ¡Hola Pirate!
>
> El 2016-09-06 a las 12:52 +0530, Pirate Praveen escribió:
> >> That might be related, sadly, while it claims that's fixed for 5.8, it
> >> doesn't point to the corresponding commits, so we can only wait for 5.8.
> >
control: tag -1 unreproducible
control: severity -1 important
* shirish शिरीष:
>> I can reproduce the bug on neither amd64 (4.9.0-1-amd64) nor i386
>> (4.9.0-1-686-pae).
>
> Could you share what attempts you did to see if the error occurs ?
Sure. I created a fresh rar archive containing just my
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 unreproducible
Bug #820381 [rar] rar crashes.
Bug #849546 [rar] rar t - segmentation fault
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> severity -1 important
Bug #820381 [rar] rar crashes.
Bug #849546 [rar] rar t - segmentation fault
Severity se
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Not reproducible + waiting for moreinfo for a month => downgrade
> severity 844285 important
Bug #844285 [pidgin] pidgin: steals (warps) mouse cursor (not just focus) when
new message comes in [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Severity set to 'important' from
Package: entropybroker
Version: 2.8-2
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
upstream fixed an issue (https://github.com/flok99/entropybroker/issues/5) that
may lead the system to a 100% CPU load.
I will try to package this new version (2.9) as it
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 855451 + pending
Bug #855451 [inn2] inn2: FTBFS: objdump: … passwd/auth_krb5': No such file
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
855451: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 11:00:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#797161: fixed in libprelude 1.0.0-11.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #797161,
regarding libprelude2 contains files with different SONAME versioning
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 11:00:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#844897: fixed in libprelude 1.0.0-11.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #844897,
regarding libprelude: FTBFS: PreludeEasy.cxx:2452:75: error:
'SWIG_From_long_SS_long' was not declared in this scope
to be marke
I uploaded a fixed version to mentors.debian.net :
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/entropybroker/entropybroker_2.9-0.1.dsc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 856187 patch
Bug #856187 [entropybroker] entropybroker 2.8 : 100% cpu load in master/slave
setup
Added tag(s) patch.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
856187: http://bugs.debian.org/cg
Source: vbrfix
Version: 0.24-7
Severity: serious
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/armhf/vbrfix.html
...
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef
-Wall -pedantic -W -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -O2
-fno-exc
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 13:04:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#828425: fixed in litecoin 0.13.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #828425,
regarding litecoin: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 13:04:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#854157: fixed in litecoin 0.13.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #854157,
regarding litecoin-qt: doesn't start - segmentation fault
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 13:04:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#811917: fixed in litecoin 0.13.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #811917,
regarding litecoin: FTBFS with GCC 6: ambiguous overload
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Also, by signing this message I ack that the previous message was from
me.
Tomasz
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: profanity
Version: 0.4.7-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch pending
Dear maintainer and release team,
I've prepared an NMU for profanity (versioned as 0.4.7-1.1).
As a newer version is already in unstable, this targets
"testing-proposed-updates".
Regards,
Tomaszdiff -Nru profanity-0.4.7/deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 854735 +patch
Bug #854735 [profanity] CVE-2017-5592
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
854735: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854735
Debian Bug Tracking Syst
control: tag -1 patch
Here's a patch that keeps the test that randomly fails on i386 enabled,
but the result is ignored.
Cheers,
-Hilko
>From cbb2054fc82a55fadbb18d7a07b4906a57d2a559 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hilko Bengen
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 12:00:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Ignore res
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 13:34:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#856199: fixed in vbrfix 0.24+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #856199,
regarding vbrfix FTBFS on armhf
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #849132 [src:google-perftools] google-perftools FTBFS on i386: FAIL:
profiler_unittest.sh
Added tag(s) patch.
--
849132: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849132
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags 837581 + patch
Control: tags 837581 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for xfsdump (versioned as 3.1.6+nmu2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
Florian
diff -Nru xfsdump-3.1.6+nmu1/debian/changelog xfsdump-3.
Processing control commands:
> tags 837581 + patch
Bug #837581 [xfsdump] xfslibs-dev: Don't put the .so symlink to /lib/*.so
Bug #847285 [xfsdump] xfsdump: FTBFS (could not find a current XFS handle
library)
Added tag(s) patch.
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 837581 + pending
Bug #837581 [xfsdump] xfs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 855038 pending
Bug #855038 [piuparts] All test ends with "INFO: SKIP: All tests. Package
cannot be tested with piuparts:"
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
855038: http://
Processing control commands:
> tags 817236 + patch
Bug #817236 [debootstrap] schroot: no access to pseudo-terminals in new chroots
Bug #841935 [debootstrap] pbuilder: incorrect permissions on /dev/ptmx breaks
openpty()
Bug #849168 [debootstrap] pbuilder: Expect programe reported "no more ptys" an
On 26/02/17 10:25, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > I will try to run it in a clean cowbuilder with only the build-deps
> > installed and see what might be the reason.
Thanks for looking into it.
Let's also move the discussion to #855930 :).
> Just done t
Control: tags 817236 + patch
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 at 11:13:39 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> If debootstrap inside a container is meant to work, then this would seem
> like a job for an autopkgtest. I'll try to write one if someone can tell me
> which containerization technologies (systemd-nspawn?
This could have been prevented (or at least be detected more easily)
with a .symbols file. I have eadded one based upon a fresh build in a
wheezy/i386 chroot. Severalsymbols are missing when rebuilding on
stretch/i386:
--- debian/libnids1.21.symbols (libnids1.21_1.23-2_i386)
+++ dpkg-gensymbolsEzW
control: tags -1 patch
Hi!
Attaching a debdiff for an NMU with the updated symbols for all architectures.
I used the helper scripts from the pkg-kde-tools package to update the symbols
file from the build logs from the buildds.
I can upload the package to DELAY/5 if that's ok.
Cheers,
Adrian
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #856162 [src:ctpp2] ctpp2 FTBFS on !i386/amd64: missing symbols
Added tag(s) patch.
--
856162: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856162
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi Gabor!
Is there any update on this bug report from your side? Does this
problem still persist? If not, we should close this bug report
as keeping it open will delay the release of Debian Stretch.
I am running KDE 5 here on Debian unstable as well and I cannot
reproduce this particular issue.
Hi,
> During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
> sid chroot), your package failed to build on amd64.
[…]
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > sbuild-build-depends-sugar-physics-activity-dummy : Depends:
> > python-sugar-0.88 but it is not install
Control: tags -1 +patch
Hi Michael, Berlin BSP here.
Given that it's too late now to get a mallard-rng package into Stretch,
I suggest to ship the mallard-1.0.rng file as part of the yelp-tools
package for now (e.g. as /usr/share/yelp-tools/mallard/mallard-1.0.rng)
and simply use that as relaxng
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +patch
Bug #788769 [yelp-tools] yelp-check validate fails without networking:
relax-ng: failed to load external entity [..] mallard-1.0.rng
Added tag(s) patch.
--
788769: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788769
Debian Bug Tracking System
Co
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:20:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#856146: fixed in webcamoid 7.2.1+dfsg1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #856146,
regarding broken: missing dependencies
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Source: libdebian-installer
Version: 0.108
Severity: serious
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: secur...@debian.org
User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
Hi,
The 'etch' release (2007) added to the Release file, a field for SHA256
sums to authenticate Packages files. But
On 26/02/17 17:02, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> [...]
I can reproduce this with my sbuild config. Note that according to
"man sbuild" the default dep-resolver is "apt" which always takes the
first alternative. I can build successfully with
"--build-dep-resolver=aptitude", just like Sascha did.
The b
Source: anna
Version: 1.57
Severity: grave
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: secur...@debian.org
User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
Control: block -1 by 856210
Hi,
To date, anna still only implements MD5 verification of .udeb files,
despite its formal deprecation as
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 856210
Bug #856212 [src:cdebootstrap] cdebootstrap: please implement SHA256
verification of .deb files
856212 was not blocked by any bugs.
856212 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 856212: 856210
--
856212: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
Source: cdebootstrap
Version: 0.7.6
Severity: grave
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: secur...@debian.org
User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
Control: block -1 by 856210
Hi,
To date, cdebootstrap still only implements MD5 verification of .deb
files, despite its formal
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 856210
Bug #856211 [src:anna] anna: please implement SHA256 verification of .udeb files
856211 was not blocked by any bugs.
856211 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 856211: 856210
--
856211: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
Processing control commands:
> tags 855932 + patch
Bug #855932 [src:sugar-physics-activity] sugar-physics-activity: FTBFS:
unsatisfiable build-dependencies: python-sugar-0.88, python-sugar-toolkit-0.88
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 855932 + pending
Bug #855932 [src:sugar-physics-activity] sugar-phys
Control: tags 855932 + patch
Control: tags 855932 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for sugar-physics-activity (versioned as 7+dfsg-1.3) and
*wanted* to upload it to DELAYED/3, but since I've put it after the .changes
file,
it got uploaded immediately. Sorry for that...
I'll ask t
Processing control commands:
> block 856212 by -1
Bug #856212 [src:cdebootstrap] cdebootstrap: please implement SHA256
verification of .deb files
856212 was blocked by: 856210
856212 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 856212: 856213
--
856212: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
Source: cdebootstrap
Version: 0.5.8
Severity: grave
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: secur...@debian.org
User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
Control: block 856212 by -1
Hi,
cdebootstrap implemented in version 0.5.8 (2011) verification of the
Packages files using the
Source: cdebootstrap
Version: 0.5.8
Severity: grave
Tags: security stretch sid
X-Debbugs-Cc: secur...@debian.org
User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
Hi,
The current Debian 'testing' release - the upcoming 'stretch' release
candidate - removed the SHA1 sums from t
Hi Adrian,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
> control: tags -1 patch
>
> Hi!
>
> Attaching a debdiff for an NMU with the updated symbols for all architectures.
>
> I used the helper scripts from the pkg-kde-tools package to update the symbols
> file from the build logs from the buildds.
>
> I c
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:48:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#856162: fixed in ctpp2 2.8.3-20
has caused the Debian Bug report #856162,
regarding ctpp2 FTBFS on !i386/amd64: missing symbols
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Oh my, actually due to me building the package in stretch sbuild, it
got rejected during the upload. So now I've uploaded it to the
unstable, DELAYED/3. \o/
Tomasz
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: tags -1 patch pending
Hi,
On 25/02/17 18:00, James Cowgill wrote:
> On 23/02/17 22:44, Marcos Fouces wrote:
>> I am agree with you, when i fix these bugs i will create a separate git
>> branch, cherry-pick only freeze-allowed changes and try to get a package
>> ready for stretch.
>
> Ok
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch pending
Bug #851060 [libnids1.21] libnids1.21: can't assemble TCP streams on armhf
Added tag(s) pending.
--
851060: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=851060
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch pending
Bug #855602 [src:libnids] libnids: undefined reference to `before' after being
rebuilt / on mips64el
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
--
855602: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855602
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 854587 + pending
Bug #854587 [icedove] icedove: incorrect start-version in
{icedove,thunderbird}.maintscript
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
854587: http://bugs.debian.o
On 26/02/17 at 17:02 +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
> > sid chroot), your package failed to build on amd64.
> […]
> > > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > > sbuild-build-depends-sugar-physics-acti
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:18:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#851060: fixed in libnids 1.23-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #851060,
regarding libnids1.21: can't assemble TCP streams on armhf
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:18:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#855602: fixed in libnids 1.23-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #855602,
regarding libnids: undefined reference to `before' after being rebuilt / on
mips64el
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: yade
Version: 2017.01a-2
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Yade fails to build from scratch during documentation generation [1].
Relevant lines in the build log:
==
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/needspace/needspace.sty)
** (sphinx) defining (legacy) text style mac
Control: tags 855925 + patch
Control: tags 855925 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for sugar-irc-activity (versioned as 8-1.3) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
For the context of the fix, please see https://bugs.debian.org/8559
Processing control commands:
> tags 855925 + patch
Bug #855925 [src:sugar-irc-activity] sugar-irc-activity: FTBFS: unsatisfiable
build-dependencies: python-sugar-0.88, python-sugar-toolkit-0.88
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 855925 + pending
Bug #855925 [src:sugar-irc-activity] sugar-irc-activity: FT
Hi all,
> 2. This issue is already fixed in the upstream in this commit:
>
> https://github.com/gjhiggins/tempita/commit/ce87d4c0f057880c5b0dc77e83e3eecad7f355a7
> (The previous commit of this, 75064399e7e72fd67e2a0c21c675d6289e7d1ec9,
> suffers from the same error.)
Here’s a small patch that
Control: reopen -1
On 02/26/2017 05:37 PM, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> Thanks for the offer, I had already prepared the fix. I uploaded it and
> have raised the unblock request.
That didn't work, unfortunately. Several architectures are still failing [1].
Adrian
> [1] https://buildd.debian.org/stat
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #856162 {Done: Vasudev Kamath } [src:ctpp2] ctpp2
FTBFS on !i386/amd64: missing symbols
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 750895 patch
Bug #750895 [python3-tempita] python3-tempita: doesn't work
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
750895: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750895
Deb
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 18:04:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#854738: fixed in mcabber 1.0.4-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #854738,
regarding CVE-2017-5604
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
I no longer have the issue.
Feel free to close the bug.
Cheers, Gabor
On 26 Feb 2017 16:50, "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" <
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
Hi Gabor!
Is there any update on this bug report from your side? Does this
problem still persist? If not, we should close this bug repor
Control: tags 854738 + patch
Control: tags 854738 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for mcabber (versioned as 1.0.4-1.1) and
uploaded it to unstable. Please find attached the debdiff.
Regards,
Markus
diff -Nru mcabber-1.0.4/debian/changelog mcabber-1.0.4/debian/changelog
--- mcabb
Processing control commands:
> tags 854738 + patch
Bug #854738 {Done: Markus Koschany } [mcabber] CVE-2017-5604
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 854738 + pending
Bug #854738 {Done: Markus Koschany } [mcabber] CVE-2017-5604
Added tag(s) pending.
--
854738: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b
My mistake again! I included a wrong e-mail in the last upload
changelog. Here is the right debdiff. Will upload to DELAYED/3
as soon as dcut does its job.diff -Nru sugar-irc-activity-8/debian/changelog sugar-irc-activity-8/debian/changelog
--- sugar-irc-activity-8/debian/changelog 2013-07-09 20:0
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 19:16:14 +0100
with message-id <6bfa4d7e-334a-10ac-0d19-8764c2c0b...@physik.fu-berlin.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#838303: kde-plasma-desktop: KDE does not start after
log in
has caused the Debian Bug report #838303,
regarding kde-plasma-desktop: KDE does not st
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 856199 stretch sid
Bug #856199 {Done: Adrian Bunk } [src:vbrfix] vbrfix FTBFS on
armhf
Added tag(s) sid and stretch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
856199: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #856210 [src:libdebian-installer] libdebian-installer: please parse SHA256
field and add it to di_* structs
Added tag(s) patch.
--
856210: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856210
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.deb
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi,
The regression in Bug#856215 in cdebootstrap:
"since SHA1 removal from Release file, only MD5sums are used"
could only be fixed by adding support for the SHA256 fields.
An open question is whether to preserve any support for MD5.
Keeping it would:
+ reduce potenti
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # The bug has been fixed in release 1.5
> close 851852
Bug #851852 [netdata] netdata: postfix/postdrop Read-only filesystem
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
851852: http://bugs.de
On 2017-02-26 01:03:23 [+0100], John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> But the question is whether SSL support is actually relevant in khtml at all.
If it is not exported or mixed with QT's SSL then it is not relevant.
> As you can see from the list of reverse dependencies, there's actually not
> muc
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 18:51:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#856182: fixed in netdata 1.5.0+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #856182,
regarding Package does not include node.d directory required by nodejs plugins
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Source: ufraw
Version: 0.22-1
Severity: serious
From an armhf build:
...
make[4]: Entering directory '/home/debian/ufraw-0.22'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0
-I/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0/
-I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/includ
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 852929 patch
Bug #852929 [src:scalable-cyrfonts] scalable-cyrfonts: FTBFS: LaTeX requires
e-TeX.
Added tag(s) patch.
> user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-rele...@lists.debian.org (was sa...@debian.org).
> usertags 85
tags 852929 patch
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertags 852929 + bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
thanks
Hi all,
[…]
> touch latex_mtx
> tex --ini '\input hugelatex.ini \dump'
> This is TeX, Version 3.14159265 (TeX Live 2016/Debian) (INITEX)
> (./hugelatex.ini
> (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/l
Hello!
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 07:43:29AM +0100, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> On Feb/16, Henri Salo wrote:
> > Shouldn't this be closed AFTER the fix is available? Especially since this
> > is a
> > security issue.
>
> Yes. Bastien, can you please reopen this ?
AFAICS, pdfsandwich uses OCaml's t
On 02/26/2017 07:48 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> I don't insist on anything. I noticed that this package does not depend on
> libssl after building and that is why I took a look.
Interesting. So, I guess the best option would actually to drop the B-D on
libssl-dev completely. I have chec
control: tag -1 pending
control: user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
control: usertag -1 bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
control: usertag 856226 bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
I have (hopefully) fixed these bugs by uploading a new upstream snapshot
to DELAYED/15, see #856226.
Cheers,
-Hilko
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #854000 [src:libplist] CVE-2017-5834 CVE-2017-5835 CVE-2017-5836
Added tag(s) pending.
> user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> usertag -1 bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
Unknown command or malformed argume
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #851196 [src:libplist] libplist: CVE-2017-5209
Added tag(s) pending.
> user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> usertag -1 bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
>
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #852385 [src:libplist] libplist: CVE-2017-5545
Added tag(s) pending.
> user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> usertag -1 bsp-2017-02-de-Berlin
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
>
Source: qpxtool
Version: 0.7.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
From an armhf build:
...
g++ -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/home/debian/qpxtool-0.7.2=.
-fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -O2 -fPIC
-DOFFT_64BIT -DHAVE_FOPEN64 -DHAVE_FSEEKO -DUSE_LIBPNG -I. -I./inc
Package: routino-www
Version: 3.1.1-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
Having installed and reinstalled both of the packages routino
and routino-www, I notice that the data files
nodes.mem, relations.mem, segments.mem and ways.mem
that, according to the
Source: edtsurf
Version: 0.2009-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
From an armhf build:
...
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/debian/edtsurf-0.2009'
g++ -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2
-fdebug-prefix-map=/home/debian/edtsurf-0.2009=. -fstack-protector-strong
-Wformat -Werror=format-s
In data domenica 26 febbraio 2017 20:15:25 CET, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ha
scritto:
> On 02/26/2017 07:48 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > I don't insist on anything. I noticed that this package does not depend on
> > libssl after building and that is why I took a look.
That is because
On February 26, 2017 2:15:25 PM EST, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>On 02/26/2017 07:48 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> I don't insist on anything. I noticed that this package does not
>depend on
>> libssl after building and that is why I took a look.
>
>Interesting. So, I guess the
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 19:33:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#856218: fixed in yade 2017.01a-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #856218,
regarding FTBFS during documentation build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Morten,
On 02/26/2017 08:19 PM, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
> Having installed and reinstalled both of the packages routino
> and routino-www, I notice that the data files
>
> nodes.mem, relations.mem, segments.mem and ways.mem
>
> tha
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #856232 [routino-www] routino-www: Data files in /var/lib/routino/data not
created
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #856232 [routino-www] routino-www: Data files in /var/lib/routino/data not
created
Added tag
Processing control commands:
> tags 854740 + patch
Bug #854740 [src:slixmpp] CVE-2017-5591
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 854740 + pending
Bug #854740 [src:slixmpp] CVE-2017-5591
Added tag(s) pending.
--
854740: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854740
Debian Bug Tracking System
Conta
Control: tags 854740 + patch
Control: tags 854740 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for slixmpp (versioned as 1.2.2-1.1) and
uploaded it to unstable. Please find attached the debdiff.
Regards,
Markus
diff -Nru slixmpp-1.2.2/debian/changelog slixmpp-1.2.2/debian/changelog
--- slixm
Hello Pirate Praveen,
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 07:31:24PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> package: vino
> version: 3.22.0-1
> severity: grave
> justification: makes the package unuseable
>
> I'm not able to share desktop using vino (5900 socket is not open) and
> when I manually start vino-server I
On 2017-02-26 20:31:23 [+0100], Pino Toscano wrote:
> In data domenica 26 febbraio 2017 20:15:25 CET, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ha
> scritto:
> > On 02/26/2017 07:48 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > I don't insist on anything. I noticed that this package does not depend on
> > > libssl a
Hi all,
first of all, apologies for the late reply. I moved in February, and I'm
still in the process of settling in. I have still to unpack my
development machine...
On 2017-02-14 09:39, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jan 2017, Sophie Brun wrote:
>> AttributeError: 'BitEnumField' object has
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #856142 [ghostscript] ghostscript: CVE-2017-6196
Added tag(s) patch.
--
856142: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856142
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + patch
Attached proposed debdiff (not yet uploaded, neither to a delayed
queue).
Regards,
Salvatore
diff -Nru ghostscript-9.20~dfsg/debian/changelog
ghostscript-9.20~dfsg/debian/changelog
--- ghostscript-9.20~dfsg/debian/changelog 2017-01-25 05:26:10.0
+0100
+++ g
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #779990 [gwave] gwave: Segmentation fault on startup
Added tag(s) pending.
> severity -1 serious
Bug #779990 [gwave] gwave: Segmentation fault on startup
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
779990: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
Brian May writes:
> amavisd-new has already been removed from testing. I think the chances
> of getting it back in are remote - however I have asked the release team
> - see #856067.
The release gods^h^h^h^h^h team has spoken. They say they will accept
amavisd-new back in the archive:
"Not in a
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
