Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:06:47 -0600
with message-id <20161114160646.GV16186@geta>
and subject line Re: Bug#844320: BTS no longer knows packages and versions in
stable/testing/unstable/experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #844320,
regarding BTS no longer knows packages and v
Le 14/11/2016 à 16:56, 殷啟聰 a écrit :
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Gradle 3.1 is now uploaded, looks like this bug is fixed?
The bug is not fixed (there is a incompatible change in the interface
without package rename).
However, for Debian, as gradle seems the only reverse dependency of
libnati
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 844148 glibc
Bug #844148 [src:acl2] acl2: FTBFS: certification failed directory
Bug reassigned from package 'src:acl2' to 'glibc'.
No longer marked as found in versions acl2/7.2dfsg-3.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #8441
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 844186
Bug #844186 [node-iconv-lite] RFH: libjs-handlebars -- need help in modifying
grunt to build libjs-handlebars (and other modules with Gruntfile.js)
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:54:27PM +0100, Marcel Meckel wrote:
> Package: tzdata
> Version: 2016i-0+deb7u1
> Severity: critical
>
> Upgrading a fully updated wheezy system (incl. security repo) to
> jessie (incl. security repo) results in tzdata not being updated
> because the version in wheezy-se
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 840957 + pending
Bug #840957 [src:mupdf] mupdf: CVE-2016-8674: heap-use-after-free
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
840957: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:33:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#844323: fixed in ghc 8.0.1-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #844323,
regarding FTBFS on ppc64el
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
wf...@niif.hu (Ferenc Wágner) writes:
> Just adding that Shibboleth itself is also problematic, because
> XMLTooling, which is incompatible with OpenSSL 1.1, uses libcurl, which
> already switched to OpenSSL 1.1. So switching xml-security-c to OpenSSL
> 1.0 did not actually solve the problem for
Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:37:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#840957: fixed in mupdf 1.9a+ds1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #840957,
regarding mupdf: CVE-2016-8674: heap-use-after-free
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 828286 1:2.2.26.0-3
Bug #828286 {Done: Apollon Oikonomopoulos } [src:dovecot]
dovecot: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
No longer marked as found in versions dovecot/1:2.2.26.0-3.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
close 844186
thanks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 844271 - sid fixed-upstream stretch + pending
Bug #844271 [dovecot-core] imap-login: Fatal: Invalid ssl_protocols setting:
Unknown protocol 'SSLv2'
Bug #844311 [dovecot-core] dovecot-core: Invalid ssl_protocols setting: Unknown
protocol 'SS
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #844271 [dovecot-core] imap-login: Fatal: Invalid ssl_protocols setting:
Unknown protocol 'SSLv2'
Bug #844311 [dovecot-core] dovecot-core: Invalid ssl_protocols setting: Unknown
protocol 'SSLv2'
Bug #844345 [dovecot-core] dovecot: unknown pr
I like my systems to have packages from stable and stable security only.
So when I do a dist-upgrade and remove old/outdated/not needed packages
I expect to have all remaining packages to be from stable.
tzdata - although with a newer version - being stuck on oldstable,
is not expected.
It doesn
Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:48:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#844271: fixed in dovecot 1:2.2.26.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #844271,
regarding dovecot-core: Invalid ssl_protocols setting: Unknown protocol 'SSLv2'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:48:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#844271: fixed in dovecot 1:2.2.26.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #844271,
regarding dovecot-core: Does not work with openssl with error "Invalid
ssl_protocols setting: Unknown protocol 'SSLv2'"
to be mar
Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:48:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#844271: fixed in dovecot 1:2.2.26.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #844271,
regarding imap-login: Fatal: Invalid ssl_protocols setting: Unknown protocol
'SSLv2'
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:48:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#844271: fixed in dovecot 1:2.2.26.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #844271,
regarding dovecot: unknown protocol SSLv2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 by 844271
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was not blocked by any bugs.
827061 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844271, 844345, 844347, and 844311
> thanks
Stopping processing here
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 844344 grave
Bug #844344 [src:p7zip] p7zip: CVE-2016-9296: Null pointer dereference (in
7zIn.cpp)
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
844344: http://b
> It's worth noting that Apache also requires OpenSSL 1.0, which may also
> affect what the Shibboleth stack can link against.
No, that code is isolated into shibd, mod_shib doesn't link to it. That was
deliberate of course, for exactly this reason.
There are edge cases. If you link Xerces to li
Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:19:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#843003: fixed in fritzing 0.9.3b+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #843003,
regarding fritzing: fails to build on all architectures except i386 and amd64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
I just tested haskell-zeromq4-haskell build with a patched GHC and it
worked fine, so, I understand also that the problem is fixed.
I just installed the packages also, and they seem to be working properly:
dpkg -l | grep zeromq
ii libghc-zeromq4-haskell-dev 0.6.5-5
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:34:52AM +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> Hi Hilko and Kurt,
>
> some progress on this: I have modified Hilko's patch to use new API
> functions to access the OCSP response info, see attachment. This seems
> to have been the last issue, Bro builds fine with this patch for
Am 13.11.2016 um 19:43 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 13.11.2016 um 18:37 schrieb Sven Joachim:
>> The toolchain has also changed quite a bit in the past four weeks, with
>> gcc having pie enabled by default and binutils at a bleeding edge
>> snapshot. Maybe one of those has triggered the build failu
Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit le 14/11/2016 à 16:09 :
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the src:libsis-jhdf5-java package:
>
> #842815: libsis-jhdf5-java: Please support HDF5 1.10
>
> It has been closed by Andreas Tille .
>
> Their expla
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gtk+3.0
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.o
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 05:03:45AM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > Looking at mod_ssl_openssl.h and the comment in #828330,
> > I'd suggest the change below to add a dependency on libssl1.0-dev
> > to apache2-dev.
>
> And that exactly happens meaning that PHP 7.0 can no longer be built
> unless all
Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:48:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#843864: fixed in dpdk 16.07-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #843864,
regarding dpdk-*-dkms: module FTBFS for Linux 4.8: unconditionally tries to
build for the running kernel
to be marked as done.
This mean
On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 14:05:28 +0200 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> tags 827068 + patch
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> A patch is available at:
> https://gitlab.com/m2crypto/m2crypto/merge_requests/98
>
> Kurt
The diff doesn't work like that on the upstream code in the archive, I'll
package
a repo snapshot as soon
Package: fracplanet
Version: 0.4.0-5
Severity: serious
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=fracplanet&suite=sid
g++ -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/«PKGBUILDDIR»=. -fstack-protector-strong
-Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-O1 -o fracplanet
obj/common.o obj/control.o obj/c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 844315 normal
Bug #844315 [tzdata] tzdata version breaks dist-upgrade leaving version from
oldstable security installed
Severity set to 'normal' from 'critical'
> tags 844315 jessie
Bug #844315 [tzdata] tzdata version breaks dist-upgrade
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 835531 !
Failed to reopen 835531: Not altering archived bugs; see unarchive.
> unarchive 835531
Bug #835531 {Done: Daniel Stender } [src:theano] theano:
FTBFS on amd64 (fail of test_csr_correct_output_faster_than_scipy)
Unarchived Bug 835
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 835531 !
Bug #835531 {Done: Daniel Stender } [src:theano] theano:
FTBFS on amd64 (fail of test_csr_correct_output_faster_than_scipy)
Bug reopened
Changed Bug submitter to 'Daniel Stender ' from
'Daniel Stender '.
Ignoring request to alter
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 maradns: CVE-2016-9300 CVE-2016-9301 CVE-2016-9302
Bug #844121 [src:maradns] Remote crash in MaraDNS 2.0.13
Changed Bug title to 'maradns: CVE-2016-9300 CVE-2016-9301 CVE-2016-9302' from
'Remote crash in MaraDNS 2.0.13'.
--
844121: http://bugs.debian.or
Control: retitle -1 maradns: CVE-2016-9300 CVE-2016-9301 CVE-2016-9302
Hi,
Three CVEs have been assigned in meanwhile for the found issues. Cf.
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/14/8
Regards,
Salvatore
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 828216 serious
Bug #828216 [src:pyinfra] pyinfra: AssertionError: {'user': 'pyinfra', 'mode':
777, 'mtime': '2017-02-13T12:56:00'[29 chars] '8'}
Severity set to 'serious' from 'wishlist'
> user reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Source: pytest-httpbin
Version: 0.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
The package currently doesn't build:
tests/test_httpbin.py::test_chunked_encoding[https] FAILED
=== FAILURES ===
__
Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2016 20:00:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#840852: fixed in linux 4.8.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #840852,
regarding please make libcpupower-dev depend on libcpupower1 (=
${binary:Version})
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2016 20:00:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#843199: fixed in linux 4.8.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #843199,
regarding perf is linked to libcrypto - licence incompatibility
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear radcli maintainers,
Am 05.11.2016 um 20:42 schrieb Jan Wagner:
> Am 03.11.2016 um 00:51 schrieb Jan Wagner:
>> monitoring-plugins configure tries to detect the radius library
>> which can't be detected, with libradcli-dev (and libradcli4)
>>
Source: jasperreports
Version: 6.2.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
jasperreports fails to build from source in unstable/amd6
Hi Gilles,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 07:32:04PM +0100, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit le 14/11/2016 à 16:09 :
> > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> > which was filed against the src:libsis-jhdf5-java package:
> >
> > #842815: libsis-jhdf5-ja
Package: libssl1.1
Version: 1.1.0c-1
Severity: critical
Tags: upstream
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Hi,
update to 1.1.0c broke Python ssl wrapper. I have first faced the issue
with offlineimap, which would crash with the [Errno 0] Error and the
following stack-trace when trying to ref
On Monday, 14 November 2016 05:03:45 CET Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > Looking at mod_ssl_openssl.h and the comment in #828330,
> > I'd suggest the change below to add a dependency on libssl1.0-dev
> > to apache2-dev.
>
> And that exactly happens meaning that PHP 7.0 can no longer be built
> unless all i
On 2016-11-14 00:17:31 [+0100], gregor herrmann wrote:
> Thanks, but nope, still the same:
What about this one?
Sebastian
>From b436cd6527a2a32bd94b67ff10363e45a2f52430 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 21:03:24 +
Subject: [PATCH] take #2
---
s
Control: reopen -1
Andreas Tille a écrit le 14/11/2016 à 21:15 :
> Hi Gilles,
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 07:32:04PM +0100, Gilles Filippini wrote:
>> Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit le 14/11/2016 à 16:09 :
>>> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
>>> which was filed aga
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #842815 {Done: Andreas Tille } [src:libsis-jhdf5-java]
libsis-jhdf5-java: Please support HDF5 1.10
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopene
Dear Sergei,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> tags 828566 + patch
> thanks
>
> Hi, Muammar,
>
> I'd like to offer a patch which ports tcltls to the new Openssl 1.1.
> It's already forwarded upstream
> (https://sourceforge.net/p/tls/bugs/66/) though I don't know when it
> (o
Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2016 21:18:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#844069: fixed in openntpd 1:6.0p1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #844069,
regarding openntpd: installation fails: Unit entered failed state
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2016 22:24:11 +0100
with message-id <20161114222411.77887...@heffalump.sk2.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#843376: gcc-mingw-w64: FTBFS (uudecode: Command not
found)
has caused the Debian Bug report #843376,
regarding gcc-mingw-w64: FTBFS (uudecode: Command not found)
Control: affects -1 kodi
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:47:00 +0100 Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 13.11.2016 um 19:43 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> > Am 13.11.2016 um 18:37 schrieb Sven Joachim:
> >> The toolchain has also changed quite a bit in the past four weeks, with
> >> gcc having pie enabled by default and
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 kodi
Bug #844227 [src:mutter] FTBFS on mips*, ./.libs/libmutter-cogl.so: undefined
reference to `eglQueryString'
Added indication that 844227 affects kodi
--
844227: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844227
Debian Bug Tracking System
Cont
Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2016 22:24:11 +0100
with message-id <20161114222411.77887...@heffalump.sk2.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#843376: gcc-mingw-w64: FTBFS (uudecode: Command not
found)
has caused the Debian Bug report #843377,
regarding gnat-mingw-w64: FTBFS (uudecode: Command not found)
Control: tag -1 + patch
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 22:07:12 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2016-11-14 00:17:31 [+0100], gregor herrmann wrote:
> > Thanks, but nope, still the same:
> What about this one?
Yay, this looks good!
Built, installed, started, and it's still running after severa
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + patch
Bug #843988 [stunnel4] stunnel4 segfaults (client mode)
Added tag(s) patch.
--
843988: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843988
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On 14/11/16 20:08, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: fracplanet
> Version: 0.4.0-5
> Severity: serious
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=fracplanet&suite=sid
>
> g++ -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/«PKGBUILDDIR»=. -fstack-protector-strong
> -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wl,-z,relro -
setting ssl_protocols = !SSLv3 in dovecot.conf worked as a temporary
solution, thanks Mr. Sprickerhof!
Lance
Processing control commands:
> reassign 844148 acl2
Bug #844148 [glibc] acl2: FTBFS: certification failed directory
Bug reassigned from package 'glibc' to 'acl2'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #844148 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of
control: reassign 844148 acl2
On 2016-11-14 11:24, Camm Maguire wrote:
> reassign 844148 glibc
> thanks
>
> Greetings, and thanks so much for your report!
>
> Neither ACL2 nor underlying gcl makes any use of threads or locks, but
> does rely on standard libc calls, which are known to turn on cod
Source: libelfin
Version: 0.2-2
Severity: serious
Your package built nowhere:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libelfin
The previous version didn't build anywhere either, so I'm surprised
this was uploaded to sid without fixing that first...
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.p
On 2016-11-14 22:43:16 [+0100], gregor herrmann wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + patch
>
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 22:07:12 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
> > On 2016-11-14 00:17:31 [+0100], gregor herrmann wrote:
> > > Thanks, but nope, still the same:
> > What about this one?
>
> Yay, this lo
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:13:14 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Built, installed, started, and it's still running after several
> > fetchnews runs. Thanks!
> Thank you for the confirmation. And now please explain why it works with
> openssl 1.0.2. It should have exploded the same way…
So
On 2016-11-14 22:53, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> control: reassign 844148 acl2
>
> On 2016-11-14 11:24, Camm Maguire wrote:
> > reassign 844148 glibc
> > thanks
> >
> > Greetings, and thanks so much for your report!
> >
> > Neither ACL2 nor underlying gcl makes any use of threads or locks, but
> > d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 835798 828527 835585 828584 828560 828292 828601 828453
> 828447 828484
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828302 828569 828353 828585 828583 828280 828230 828619
828355 828442 828238 82
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 828361 828349 828435 828603 828305 828491 828347 828379
> 828409 828606
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828244 828375 828580 828472 828456 828436 828260 843988
828318 828426 844254 82
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 827068 828611 828545 828319 828248 828083 828323 828613
> 828343 828326
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828460 828318 828506 828399 828142 828428 828530 828583
828518 828363 828597 82
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 828557 828282 828538 828335 828474 828249 828438 828313
> 828553 828357
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828334 828417 828555 828565 828535 835804 828399 828533
828382 828388 828380 82
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 828580 828325 828505 828608 828268 828260 828430 828540
> 828529 828352
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828612 827076 828510 828570 828466 828418 828375 844347
828582 828317 828244 82
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 828297 828265 828445 828275 828082 828424 828599 835793
> 828441 828365
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828241 828507 844347 828451 828442 828616 828409 835804
828434 844271 828509 82
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 828539 828549 828264 828615 828554 828588 828459 828499
> 828564 828278
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828245 828558 844347 828357 828388 828082 828487 844311
828450 828528 828429 82
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 828242 828306 828575 828590 828340 828395 828449 828266
> 828328 828515
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828281 828584 828565 828529 828434 828303 828487 828413
828237 828488 828564 82
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 828433 828614 828327 828234 828496 828542 837960 828285
> 828374 828440
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828365 822380 828422 828350 828530 828311 828503 828506
828395 828569 828554 82
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 828522 828489 828473 828581 828284 828387 828469 828525
> 828301 828572
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828363 828549 837960 828500 828294 844311 828355 828394
829452 828441 828472 82
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 828377 828526 828356 828286 828333 828448 828251 828384
> 835789 828455
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828450 828525 828376 828324 828268 828403 828420 828387
828538 844271 828588 82
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 808669 828514 828486
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828550 828467 828525 828490 828259 828572 828619 828489
828405 828599 828557 828518 828433 828425 828397 828301 828265 844347 82828
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 828330 828517 828397 828293 828368 828425 828548 828464
> 828415 828386
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 835811 828580 828294 828507 828285 828562 828357 828510
828436 828260 809271 82
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 828446 828289 828495 828605 828477 828262 828458 828232
> 828324 828567
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828450 829452 828354 835797 828349 828272 828369 828293
828466 828430 828491 82
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412
> 828298 828277
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828555 828359 828618 827076 828422 828459 828532 828330
828535 828313 828324 82
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 828139 828471 828476 828534 835794 835786 828444 828263
> 828596 828600
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828586 837960 828245 828495 828264 828416 828358 828449
828584 828368 828555 82
Stefan Fritsch writes:
> I must admit that I did not think of php when doing that change, sorry.
> On the other hand, shibboleth-sp2 also build-depends on apache2-dev and there
> have been some indications that shibboleth won't be switching to openssl 1.1
> for stretch. See https://lists.debi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 828452 828620 828512 828321 828508 828468 828304 828396
> 828483 828235
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828311 828400 828603 835785 828455 828265 828544 828411
828557 828312 828465 83
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 828240 828329 828579 841635 828609 828485 828315 828536
> 828279 828337
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 822380 828510 828429 828468 828393 828257 828499 828278
828304 828445 828243 82
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 828537 828287 828592 828342 828461 828341 828598 828591
> 828336 828371
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828560 828365 828327 828434 828582 828257 843988 828509
828319 828357 828423 82
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 828617 828414 828556 828410 828437 828296 828561 828407
> 828546 828270
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828375 812166 828421 828263 828612 836419 828378 828553
828255 828354 828489 82
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 828502 828470 828604 828577 828454 828573 828516 828478
> 828295 828511
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828280 828259 828332 828538 844271 828367 828274 828329
828371 828619 828297 82
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 827061 with 828398 828362 828492 828391 828288 828258 828480 828310
> 828322 828543
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828608 828243 828285 828533 828306 828335 828289 828580
828481 828422 828303 84
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 22:15:18 +0100 Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
>
> Andreas Tille a écrit le 14/11/2016 à 21:15 :
> > Hi Gilles,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 07:32:04PM +0100, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> >> Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit le 14/11/2016 à 16:09 :
> >>> This is
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 07:14:12PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> looking at the problem and setting up piuparts, and using a local repository,
> I
> think the problem with upgrade from jessie to stretch/sid is solved with the
> attached patch.
>
> The following has been tested:
> * upg
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hello,
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo, on Sun 06 Nov 2016 21:06:48 +0200, wrote:
> Here is what I have so far.
It seems I never received that mail for some reason :/
> See "License: UNKNOWN-OSF" and "License: UNKNOWN-Berkeley"
> for some newly found problems.
Well, these shou
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #792622 [gnumach] missing licenses in debian/copyright
Added tag(s) pending.
--
792622: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792622
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:48:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#840073: fixed in openrc 0.21-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #840073,
regarding openrc: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified
by the user: /etc/init.d/transit
to be marked as done.
Th
Package: librospack-dev,libgtest-dev,src:ros-image-common
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build ros-image-common in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 792622 pending
Bug #792622 [gnumach] missing licenses in debian/copyright
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #792622 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
792622: h
tag 792622 pending
thanks
Hello,
Bug #792622 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-hurd/gnumach.git;a=commitdiff;h=79f915a
---
commit 79f915a4f17439d403d5181c45e69a5d8f6e9
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 821690 upstream
Bug #821690 [src:ming] src:ming: PHP 7.0 Transition
Added tag(s) upstream.
> forwarded 821690 https://github.com/libming/libming/issues/50
Bug #821690 [src:ming] src:ming: PHP 7.0 Transition
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'ht
Your message dated Tue, 15 Nov 2016 01:18:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#792622: fixed in gnumach 2:1.7+git20161115-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #792622,
regarding missing licenses in debian/copyright
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
I suppose this is the problem that this bug report is about:
root@ia-bak:/usr/local/propellor# graphite-manage
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/graphite-manage", line 15, in
execute_from_command_line(sys.argv)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/core/management
Package: php-gearman
Version: 1.1.2-96-ge77f981+1.1.2+-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
According to tracker.debian.org, php-gearman version php-gearman
1.1.2-96-ge77f981+1.1.2+-3 migrated to testing today.
The new package renders any gearman-using php a
Your message dated Tue, 15 Nov 2016 04:33:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#802190: fixed in genparse 0.9.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #802190,
regarding genparse: FTBFS: Tests fail with segmentation fault
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
101 - 200 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
