Processing control commands:
> tags 831917 + pending
Bug #831917 [src:apt-show-source] apt-show-source: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage
-A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot
distribute
Added tag(s) pending.
--
831917: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
Control: tags 831917 + pending
I've prepared an NMU for apt-show-source (versioned as 0.10+nmu5) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay
it longer or remove it.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
diff -Nru apt-show-source-0.10+nmu4/debian/changelog
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source debdry
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'debdry'
Limit currently set to 'source':'debdry'
> tags 805195 + pending
Bug #805195 [src:debdry] debdry: FTBFS: ImportError: No module named 'apt_pkg'
Added tag
On 2016-10-24 00:11, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> Package: ardour
> Version: 1:5.4.0~dfsg-1
> Severity: grave
>
> Ardour 1:4.7~dfsg-2 works great. If instead I upgrade to 1:5.3~dfsg-1 (current
> unstable) or 1:5.4.0~dfsg-1 (current testing), I get a segfault when I try to
> load any project.
thanks
I think the issue is that the file(s) in question (e.g.
/etc/freeradius/hints) are marked as conffiles in freeradius
2.2.8+dfsg-0.1+b3:
# grep hints /var/lib/dpkg/info/freeradius.*
/var/lib/dpkg/info/freeradius.conffiles:/etc/freeradius/hints
/var/lib/dpkg/info/freeradius.list:/etc/freeradius/hint
Hi Higuchi,
I believe that the upstream has already fixes this issue.
In upstream's release notes:
開発環境を Ruby 2.x & Gtk+3 に移行した安定版第2版です。
Ruby-GNOME2 3.0に対応しました。
動作させるには3.0.9以降のRuby/GTK3が必要です。
(2.2.5では動作しなくなっています。)
So I'll take some time to see if I can upload it to experimental.
But it seems to
Il giorno lun, 24/10/2016 alle 09.31 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig ha
scritto:
> [...]
> is it possible to try the ardour5 binary provided by upstream [1] and
> see whether the problem persists?
>
I just did (with the "Free/Demo" version), and it works perfectly (with
the same session/jack configurat
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 04:43:31PM +0200, Balint Reczey wrote:
> src/gtk/CMakeFiles/yabause-gtk.dir/build.make:713: recipe for target
> 'src/gtk/yabause-gtk' failed
> make[3]: *** [src/gtk/yabause-gtk] Error 1
> ...
08:36 < Zhenech> Guillaume, debian enabled PIE and bindnow for all builds
08:36 <
Package: src:swift
Version: 2.10.0-3
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
---
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #841904 [src:swift] swift: FTBFS (failing tests)
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
841904: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841904
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: severity -1 normal
Please ignore this report for now, I have to triple check.
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #841906 [src:neutron] neutron: FTBFS (failing tests)
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
841906: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841906
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: severity -1 normal
Please ignore this report for now, I have to triple check.
More than one package FTBFS for me today, but they also fail
in reproducible builds with semaphore errors, and I'm not completely
sure that the package is to blame.
[ If, however, it's cheap in terms of human
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package dgit
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'dgit'
Limit currently set to 'package':'dgit'
> fixed 840989 1.4
Bug #840989 {Done: Ian Jackson } [dgit] dgit
clone dpkg fails
Marked as fixed in versions dgit/1.4.
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 841867 1.4
Bug #841867 {Done: Ian Jackson } [dgit] dgit
cannot cope with some patches because it uses gbp-pq
Marked as fixed in versions dgit/1.4.
> found 841867 2.0
Bug #841867 {Done: Ian Jackson } [dgit] dgit
cannot cope with some patche
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 04:12:14PM +0200, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> >
> > I've now further tweaked test/test.pl's pty setup to skip the tests instead
> > of aborting with this message. So you may wish to pull this in as a patch
> > as well as fixing /dev inside your chroot :-)
> >
> > https://gi
On 2016-10-24 10:38, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> Il giorno lun, 24/10/2016 alle 09.31 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig ha
> scritto:
>> [...]
>> is it possible to try the ardour5 binary provided by upstream [1] and
>> see whether the problem persists?
>>
>
> I just did (with the "Free/Demo" version), and i
On 2016-10-24 11:51, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
> would it be possible for you to (privately) send me a segfaulting
> project (without the data files), so that i have a known-to-fail project
> for testing?
i think i have found the culprit.
i will upload a hopefully-fixed package soon (
tag 841868 pending
thanks
Hello,
Bug #841868 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/ardour.git;a=commitdiff;h=4cb88a6
---
commit 4cb88a6fb7a833536f5cf0ee9e9862ff
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 841868 pending
Bug #841868 [ardour] Segfault in Gtk::Widget::show() since upgrading to 5.*
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
841868: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
It's just a wild guess, but this
Pietro Battiston wrote:
> Package: ardour
> Version: 1:5.4.0~dfsg-1
[...]
> ii ardour-data 1:4.2~dfsg-5
just doesn't seem corect to me!
- Fabian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 841596 https://github.com/sqlobject/sqlobject/issues/128
Bug #841596 [src:sqlobject] sqlobject: FTBFS: tests failed
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/sqlobject/sqlobject/issues/128'.
> tags 841596 +upstream
Bug #841596
This is due to a change in sqlite 3.15 which breaks a incorrect, but
previously harmless, assumption made by sqlobject.
A possible fix has been submitted upstream.
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 - experimental
Thank you for your checking.
I will upload ruby-gnome2 3.0.9-2 to unstable.
--
Regards,
dai
GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839 619D D439 668E
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #840699 [ninix-aya] ninix-aya: does not work with ruby-gnome2 3.0.9-1
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> tags -1 - experimental
Bug #840699 [ninix-aya] ninix-aya: does not work with ruby-gnome2 3.0.9-1
Ignoring request to alter tag
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:52:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#806000: fixed in brickos 0.9.0.dfsg-12.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #806000,
regarding brickos: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (No such file or
directory)
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:05:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#837490: fixed in papyrus 3.7.1+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #837490,
regarding libpapyrus3-dev: Please build libPapyrus3.a with -fPIC
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:05:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#837683: fixed in opt 3.19-1.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #837683,
regarding opt: Please build libopt.a with -fPIC
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:08:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#803059: fixed in sensors-applet 3.0.0+git6-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #803059,
regarding sensors-applet: FTBFS with gnome-common 3.18: cannot open
gnome-doc-utils.make
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:42:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#837545: fixed in kvmtool 0.20161024-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #837545,
regarding kvmtool: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:42:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#837545: fixed in kvmtool 0.20161024-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #837545,
regarding kvmtool: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #841906 [src:neutron] neutron: FTBFS (failing tests)
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> retitle neutron: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
--
841906: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:42:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#837561: fixed in kvmtool 0.20161024-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #837561,
regarding kvmtool: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:42:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#837561: fixed in kvmtool 0.20161024-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #837561,
regarding kvmtool: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:41:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#841868: fixed in ardour 1:5.4.0~dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #841868,
regarding Segfault in Gtk::Widget::show() since upgrading to 5.*
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Hello Santiago Vila.
Thanks for the backtrace, it's helpful.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 01:16:20PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> The package FTBFS (sometimes) because rygel-media-engine-test segfaults.
>
> Here is a backtrace:
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x7f1a1a4b3fdf in raise () from /lib/x86_64-linu
Il giorno lun, 24/10/2016 alle 12.06 +0200, Fabian Greffrath ha
scritto:
> It's just a wild guess, but this
>
> Pietro Battiston wrote:
> >
> > Package: ardour
> > Version: 1:5.4.0~dfsg-1
> [...]
> >
> > ii ardour-data 1:4.2~dfsg-5
>
> just doesn't seem corect to me!
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 841906 neutron: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)
Bug #841906 [src:neutron] neutron: FTBFS (failing tests)
Changed Bug title to 'neutron: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)' from 'neutron:
FTBFS (failing tests)'.
>
End of message, stopping proce
Control: tags -1 - experimental
I uploaded ruby-gnome2 3.0.9-2 to unstable.
--
Regards,
dai
GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839 619D D439 668E
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - experimental
Bug #840698 [xnetcardconfig] xnetcardconfig: does not work with ruby-gnome2
3.0.9-1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #840698 to the same tags previously set
--
840698: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840698
Debian Bug T
Hi.
[...]
>> Thanks. This has fixed the problem for me. Is this solution OK for
everyone?
>
> Fine for me
OK, I'll upload later.
Cheers
Sascha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 841658 serious
Bug #841658 [alfa] alfa: build-depends on libcfitsio3-dev
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
841658: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 02:06:29AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Oct 23, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I'd have expected to at least have seen something going round saying
> > that the transition was mostly complete and that there were only a few
> > packages blocking it prior to just dumping a new ver
I think python-bitbucket can be removed. Its functionality is quite limited.
Regards
El vie., 21 oct. 2016 a las 18:28, ChangZhuo Chen ()
escribió:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:42:03AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates
> > sectio
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:54:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#838112: fixed in uctodata 0.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #838112,
regarding uctodata: fails to upgrade from 'jessie' - trying to overwrite
/etc/ucto/es.abr
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Processing control commands:
> block 837350 by -1
Bug #837350 [src:binutils] binutils: Please build libbfd.a with -fPIC
837350 was not blocked by any bugs.
837350 was blocking: 837359
Added blocking bug(s) of 837350: 841921
--
837350: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837350
84192
Processing control commands:
> forcemerge -1 746005
Bug #841736 [lilypond] lilypond in Testing?
Bug #746005 [lilypond] lilypond: please migrate to guile-2.0
Unset Bug forwarded-to-address
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
Failed to forcibly merge 841736: Not altering archived bugs; see unarc
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 01:45:24PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> If you're strongly attached to (cluttering up my maintainer view and)
> tracking every issue in the debian bug tracking system (I'd instead
> recommend you use the upstream bug tracker), then I'd welcome
> a bug report with seve
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 841691 + pending
Bug #841691 [sabnzbdplus] sabnzbdplus: uninstallable with libjs-jquery 3.1.1-1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
841691: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Control: tags 837823 + patch
Control: tags 837823 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for fprintd (versioned as 0.6.0-2.1)
I'm looking for and sponsor, then I'll upload it to DELAYED/5.
Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.
After the package reach the archive I'
Processing control commands:
> tags 837823 + patch
Bug #837823 [src:fprintd] fprintd: FTBFS due to undeclared build dependencies
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 837823 + pending
Bug #837823 [src:fprintd] fprintd: FTBFS due to undeclared build dependencies
Added tag(s) pending.
--
837823: http://bugs.
Processing control commands:
> block 837445 by -1
Bug #837445 [src:check] check: Please build libcheck.a with -fPIC
Bug #841757 [src:check] mpc: FTBFS: relocation R_X86_64_32S against `.rodata'
can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
837445 was not blocked by any bugs.
8
Control: retitle -1 binutils needs PIE binNMU
A binNMU is sufficient to fix this, and already requested.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Previous patch has urgency=medium, this patch has
urgency=low.
I plan to upload this patch
Apologizes for the noise
--
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333
keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa
diff -Nru fprintd-0.6.0/debian/changelog fprintd-0.6.0/debian/changelog
--- fprintd-0.6.0/debi
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 check needs PIE binNMU
Bug #837445 [src:check] check: Please build libcheck.a with -fPIC
Bug #841757 [src:check] mpc: FTBFS: relocation R_X86_64_32S against `.rodata'
can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
Changed Bug title to '
Control: retitle -1 check needs PIE binNMU
A binNMU is sufficient to fix this, and already requested.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 binutils needs PIE binNMU
Bug #837350 [src:binutils] binutils: Please build libbfd.a with -fPIC
Changed Bug title to 'binutils needs PIE binNMU' from 'binutils: Please build
libbfd.a with -fPIC'.
--
837350: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b
On 2016-10-24 13:48, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> Il giorno lun, 24/10/2016 alle 12.06 +0200, Fabian Greffrath ha
> scritto:
>> It's just a wild guess, but this
>>
>> Pietro Battiston wrote:
>>>
>>> Package: ardour
>>> Version: 1:5.4.0~dfsg-1
>> [...]
>>>
>>> ii ardour-data 1:
Il giorno lun, 24/10/2016 alle 16.28 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig
(Debian/GNU) ha scritto:
>
> On 2016-10-24 13:48, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> >
> > Il giorno lun, 24/10/2016 alle 12.06 +0200, Fabian Greffrath ha
> > scritto:
> > >
> > > It's just a wild guess, but this
> > >
> > > Pietro Battiston
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 837350 -patch
Bug #837350 [src:binutils] binutils needs PIE binNMU
Removed tag(s) patch.
> tags 837445 -patch
Bug #837445 [src:check] check needs PIE binNMU
Bug #841757 [src:check] check needs PIE binNMU
Removed tag(s) patch.
Removed tag(s) p
Processing control commands:
> block 837423 by -1
Bug #837423 [src:jack-audio-connection-kit] jack-audio-connection-kit: Please
build libjack.a with -fPIC
837423 was not blocked by any bugs.
837423 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 837423: 841930
--
837423: http://bugs.debian.
Control: retitle -1 jack-audio-connection-kit needs PIE binNMU
Control: tags -1 -patch
A binNMU is sufficient to fix this, and already requested.
Building static libraries with PIC is not permitted by policy.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 jack-audio-connection-kit needs PIE binNMU
Bug #837423 [src:jack-audio-connection-kit] jack-audio-connection-kit: Please
build libjack.a with -fPIC
Changed Bug title to 'jack-audio-connection-kit needs PIE binNMU' from
'jack-audio-connection-kit: Please
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 837568 by 841929
Bug #837568 {Done: Thorsten Alteholz } [libctl-dev]
libctl-dev: Please build libctlgeom.a with -fPIC
837568 was not blocked by any bugs.
837568 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 837568: 841929
> thanks
Sto
Hi Santiago,
I got a look at this issue and it seems the failing tests are setting up
a local RMI server but the subsequent connections do not work.
I don't know why it fails with your machines but if I'm not mistaken
local connections are allowed during the build.
Is the IP you redacted the one
Any chance this fix can get uploaded soon-ish? gtimelog build depends on it
so it's marked for autoremoval because of this bug. Thanks!
Processing control commands:
> block 837359 by -1
Bug #837359 [src:ocaml] ocaml: Please build libasmrun.a and libcamlrun.a with
-fPIC
837359 was blocked by: 837350
837359 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 837359: 841938
--
837359: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b
Control: retitle -1 ocaml needs PIE binNMU
Control: tags -1 -patch
A binNMU is sufficient to fix this, and already requested.
Policy does not permit building static libraries with PIC unless
there is a special reason.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 ocaml needs PIE binNMU
Bug #837359 [src:ocaml] ocaml: Please build libasmrun.a and libcamlrun.a with
-fPIC
Changed Bug title to 'ocaml needs PIE binNMU' from 'ocaml: Please build
libasmrun.a and libcamlrun.a with -fPIC'.
> tags -1 -patch
Bug #837359 [src
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 841921 837350
Bug #841938 [release.debian.org] nmu: ocaml_4.02.3-7
841938 was not blocked by any bugs.
841938 was blocking: 837359
Added blocking bug(s) of 841938: 837350 and 841921
--
841938: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841938
Debi
control: severity -1 normal
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 04:19:29PM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> Package: devscripts
> Version: 2.16.8
> Severity: grave
^ Please read the policy.
> at download a new release with uscan the repack failed.
>
> At the call of debian/repack.sh the
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #841709 [devscripts] [uscan] missing package parameter at call of
debian/repack.sh
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
--
841709: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841709
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +patch
Bug #837454 [src:flint-arb] flint-arb: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled
Added tag(s) patch.
--
837454: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837454
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 +patch
The patch I found in Ubuntu for this bug is attached,
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
retitle 840827 lucene-solr: Network tests are performed using public IP instead
of 127.0.0.1
severity 840827 normal
thanks
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 05:08:39PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I got a look at this issue and it seems the failing tests are setting up
> a local RMI server but the subse
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 840827 lucene-solr: Network tests are performed using public IP
> instead of 127.0.0.1
Bug #840827 [src:lucene-solr] lucene-solr: FTBFS (failing tests, no route to
host)
Changed Bug title to 'lucene-solr: Network tests are performed usin
Processing control commands:
> block 837456 by -1
Bug #837456 [src:frama-c] frama-c: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled
837456 was not blocked by any bugs.
837456 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 837456: 841939
--
837456: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837456
Processing control commands:
> rassagn -1 src:ocamlgraph
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> affects -1 src:frama-c
Bug #837456 [src:frama-c] frama-c: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled
Added indication that 837456 affects src:frama-c
> retitle -1 ocamlgraph needs PIE binNMU
Bug
Control: rassagn -1 src:ocamlgraph
Control: affects -1 src:frama-c
Control: retitle -1 ocamlgraph needs PIE binNMU
A binNMU is sufficient to fix this, and already requested.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 837480 https://github.com/constabulary/gb/issues/607
Bug #837480 [src:gb] gb: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/constabulary/gb/issues/607'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 837456 src:ocamlgraph
Bug #837456 [src:frama-c] ocamlgraph needs PIE binNMU
Bug reassigned from package 'src:frama-c' to 'src:ocamlgraph'.
No longer marked as found in versions frama-c/20151002+magnesium+dfsg-1.
Ignoring request to alter
Processing control commands:
> block 837567 by -1
Bug #837567 [src:mlton] mlton: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled
837567 was not blocked by any bugs.
837567 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 837567: 841941
--
837567: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837567
841
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 mlton needs PIE binNMU
Bug #837567 [src:mlton] mlton: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled
Changed Bug title to 'mlton needs PIE binNMU' from 'mlton: FTBFS with bindnow
and PIE enabled'.
--
837567: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837567
D
Control: retitle -1 mlton needs PIE binNMU
A binNMU should be sufficient to fix this, and already requested.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Control: retitle -1 psicode needs PIE binNMU
A binNMU should be sufficient to fix this, and is already requested.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er
Processing control commands:
> block 837569 by -1
Bug #837569 [libpsi3-dev] libpsi3-dev Please build static libraries with -fPIC
837569 was not blocked by any bugs.
837569 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 837569: 841942
--
837569: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:24:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#841721: fixed in lxqt-l10n 0.11.0-19-g717bd7e-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #841721,
regarding lxqt-l10n: Debian changelog is incomplete
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 psicode needs PIE binNMU
Bug #837569 [libpsi3-dev] libpsi3-dev Please build static libraries with -fPIC
Changed Bug title to 'psicode needs PIE binNMU' from 'libpsi3-dev Please build
static libraries with -fPIC'.
--
837569: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package python-pyhsm
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.deb
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +patch
Bug #837576 [src:sbcl] sbcl: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled
Added tag(s) patch.
--
837576: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837576
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 +patch
The patch I found in Ubuntu for this bug is attached,
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:14:18 +0800 sharuzzaman wrote:
[...]
> with previous version of linux-image-4.7.0-1-686, I'm able to boot my laptop
> with no issue.
>
> yesterday, I update the kernel to version 4.7.8-1 from debian repository
> using aptitude upgrade, then after reboot, the laptop is not
reassign 811996 src:ptlib
reassign 837577 src:ptlib
forcemerge 811996 837577
affects 811996 src:t38modem
thanks
Strictly speaking the ptlib build failure is unrelated to the t38modem
build failure, but a ptlib binNMU is not possible due to the ptlib
FTBFS, and any new ptlib upload will automatica
Dear GNOME maintainers:
Based on the comments by Andreas in the rygel bug, I could understand
your desire to do the "right thing" and fix the failing tests, but it
surely would take time and effort, and nobody can really force you to do that.
If you decide to disable the tests, I'm attaching a pa
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 837659 src:ocaml
Bug #837659 [ocaml-nox] hivex: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled
Bug reassigned from package 'ocaml-nox' to 'src:ocaml'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #837659 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 841741 grave
Bug #841741 [grub-common] grub-probe fails to find GRUB drive
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
> retitle 841741 grub-probe fails to find GRUB drive, makes system unbootable
Bug #841741 [grub-common] grub-probe fails to f
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:04:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#806107: fixed in signond 8.59-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #806107,
regarding signond: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (No such file or
directory)
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Processing control commands:
> block 837686 by -1
Bug #837686 [libint-dev] libint-dev: Please build static libraries with -fPIC
837686 was not blocked by any bugs.
837686 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 837686: 841946
--
837686: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Source: boost1.61
Version: 1.61.0+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: make other packages FTBFS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
When rebuilding the psi4 package on amd6', it FTBFS with:
[100%] Linking CXX executable ../../../bin/psi4
cd /<>/builddir/src/bin/psi4 && /usr/
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 libint needs PIE binNMU
Bug #837686 [libint-dev] libint-dev: Please build static libraries with -fPIC
Changed Bug title to 'libint needs PIE binNMU' from 'libint-dev: Please build
static libraries with -fPIC'.
--
837686: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
