Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfixed 622652 1.0.25+1 Bug #622652 [alsa-source] alsa-driver: fails to build on powermac There is no source info for the package 'alsa-source' at version '1.0.25+1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '1.0.25+1' No

Processed: Re: libxtables9: file conflict with iptables 1.4.16.3-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 692187 692182 Bug #692187 [libxtables9] file conflict between iptables and libxtables9, failing upgrades Bug #692187 [libxtables9] file conflict between iptables and libxtables9, failing upgrades Added tag(s) patch. Bug #692182 [libxt

Bug#692182: libxtables9: file conflict with iptables 1.4.16.3-1

forcemerge 692187 692182 quit Jonathan Nieder wrote: > I'll send a symbols file to make the package policy §8.6 compliant > later tonight. I had forgotten dh automatically calls dh_makeshlibs. The patch at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=10;bug=692182 should be enough. Sorry f

Bug#692190: ruby-pgplot: ftbfs missing pgplot5 build-dependency

package: ruby-pgplot version: 0.1.3-3 severity: serious Hi, Your package has failed to build on the buildds due to a build-dependency on missing pgplot5 for a while now. That is considered missing since it is a package in non-free. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc

Bug#677146: marked as done (python-uno uses unopkg from libreoffice-common in preinst without declaring Pre-Depends)

Your message dated Sat, 3 Nov 2012 09:01:50 +0100 with message-id <20121103080150.ga5...@rene-engelhard.de> and subject line Re: Bug#677146: python-uno uses unopkg from libreoffice-common in preinst without declaring Pre-Depends has caused the Debian Bug report #677146, regarding python-uno uses u

Bug#677943: [Packaging] Bug#677943: release critical?

Hi, (I managed to find some time to review this patch, finally.) gregor herrmann wrote (27 Oct 2012 15:51:05 GMT) : > Which means we need to create the symlink for new installs and for > upgrades from this range. Correct so far? I think so. > Here's an attempt to implement this idea: [...] > -

Processed: Re: missing Replaces:

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 692171 libxtables9 Bug #692171 {Done: ljl...@debian.org (Laurence J. Lane)} [iptables] missing Replaces: iptables << 1.4.16.3-3 Bug reassigned from package 'iptables' to 'libxtables9'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #692

Processed: Re: missing Replaces:

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 692171 iptables/1.4.16.3-4 Bug #692171 {Done: ljl...@debian.org (Laurence J. Lane)} [libxtables9] missing Replaces: iptables << 1.4.16.3-3 Bug #692182 {Done: ljl...@debian.org (Laurence J. Lane)} [libxtables9] libxtables9: file conflict wi

Bug#646642: needs update for wheezy rhythmbox

Now that it has been removed from wheezy, there should be no problem to upload the new version to sid. any ETA for this? -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.

Bug#689884: Bug#692157: couriergraph: diff for NMU version 0.25-4.2

El 02/11/12 20:26, Salvatore Bonaccorso escribió: Package: couriergraph Version: 0.25-4.1 Severity: normal Tags: patch pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for couriergraph (versioned as 0.25-4.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.

Bug#688413: accountsservice: Makes gnome-shell crash libglib-2.0

Hi, Le vendredi 02 novembre 2012 à 09:53 +, Simon McVittie a écrit : > I've sent a possible patch to the upstream bug > and built .debs > with that patch (version 0.6.21-6+smcv1), > but since I can't reprod

Processed: tagging 688413

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 688413 - unreproducible + pending Bug #688413 [accountsservice] accountsservice: Makes gnome-shell crash Bug #689651 [accountsservice] gnome-shell[4471] trap int3 ip:7f7595135341 sp:7fffee8f32b0 error:0 Removed tag(s) unreproducible. Removed

Bug#682612: marked as done (/sbin/ip6tables-multi: Cannot restore ip6tables, fails at Commit line)

Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2012 12:30:27 + with message-id <50950e63.3050...@debian.org> and subject line Not a bug has caused the Debian Bug report #682612, regarding /sbin/ip6tables-multi: Cannot restore ip6tables, fails at Commit line to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Processed: Re: simgear-dev: fails to upgrade from squeeze - apt does not find an upgrade path

Processing control commands: > found -1 2.4.0-1.3 Bug #667526 {Done: Neil Williams } [simgear-dev] simgear-dev: fails to upgrade from squeeze - apt does not find an upgrade path Did not alter found versions and reopened. -- 667526: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667526 Debian

Bug#677943: [Packaging] Bug#677943: release critical?

On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 21:44:27 +0100, intrigeri wrote: > gregor herrmann wrote (27 Oct 2012 15:51:05 GMT) : > > Which means we need to create the symlink for new installs and for > > upgrades from this range. Correct so far? > I think so. Good :) > > Here's an attempt to implement this idea: > [.

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

* gregor herrmann wrote [24.10.12 17:13]: Hi, > Running the tests under xvfb I get a different failure: JFTR I get the exact same error messages running it directly in X11. > (and it goes on and on for pages) > > So: no idea :/ > > (I'm still attaching the change to use xvfb which seems to be

Processed: bug 689954 is forwarded to linux-b...@nvidia.com, found 617481 in 0.52 ..., tagging 690971 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 689954 linux-b...@nvidia.com Bug #689954 [nvidia-kernel-dkms] Module does not load/recognize GT650M albeit it should Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'linux-b...@nvidia.com'. > found 617481 0.52 Bug #617481 [debdelta] debdelta: owned and

Bug#691900: [pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers] Bug#691900: gwt: CVE-2012-4563

Le Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:43:19AM +0100, Thomas Koch a écrit : > Charles Plessy: > > > > In particular I do not know if the best resolution for this bug is to > > upgrade to 2.5.0 or to patch, so I am reluctant to take action by myself, > > worrying that I might complicate your work on Gerrit. >

Bug#677943: [Packaging] Bug#677943: release critical?

Hi intrigeri, thanks indeed for re-checking this patch! I'll will upload soon! cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#688413: marked as done (accountsservice: Makes gnome-shell crash)

Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2012 13:32:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#688413: fixed in accountsservice 0.6.21-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #688413, regarding accountsservice: Makes gnome-shell crash to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#689651: marked as done (gnome-shell[4471] trap int3 ip:7f7595135341 sp:7fffee8f32b0 error:0)

Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2012 13:32:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#688413: fixed in accountsservice 0.6.21-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #688413, regarding gnome-shell[4471] trap int3 ip:7f7595135341 sp:7fffee8f32b0 error:0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#689769: ample: diff for NMU version 0.5.7-6.1

tags 689769 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ample (versioned as 0.5.7-6.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. reverted: --- ample-0.5.7/debian/postinst +++ ample-0.5.7.orig/debian/postinst @@ -1,37 +0,0 @@ -#

Processed: ample: diff for NMU version 0.5.7-6.1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 689769 + pending Bug #689769 [ample] Ample ships a /var/run/ample folder: Policy 9.3.2 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 689769: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 674900 672030 Bug #674900 [src:beast] beast fails to build from source ( ../doxer/doxer.py: No such file or directory) Bug #674900 [src:beast] beast fails to build from source ( ../doxer/doxer.py: No such file or directory) Added tag(s) si

Bug#689882: marked as done (Ships a folder in /var/run or /var/lock (Policy Manual section 9.3.2))

Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2012 14:54:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#691082: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #689882, regarding Ships a folder in /var/run or /var/lock (Policy Manual section 9.3.2) to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#691605: marked as done (override: multiarch-support should be priority required)

Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:06:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#691605: fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #691605, regarding override: multiarch-support should be priority required to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#678786: Build successful

Works for me too under pbuilder sid/amd64. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#692215: yatex: recommend non-free ptex-jtex and list non-existing binary packages texlive-bin gimageview jweblint

Package: yatex Version: 1.76+dfsg1-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The main archive area I admit this bug may be tagged as wheezy-ignore per wheezy release policy http://release.debian.org/wheezy/rc_policy.txt Also, the interpretation of policy have some room to be debated. htt

Bug#690153: jscribble: FTBFS: tests timeout

Hi, I have just tried to build with pbuilder for wheezy and with sbuild for wheezy and sid (all amd64). All the builds succeed. Cheers Filippo

Bug#670405: ekiga: During start up segfault in `libopal.so.3.10.4`

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:07:55PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > Berto, it would be awesome if you could test Ekiga from experimental > [3][4] and report back if it fixes the issues for you. I've just tried ekiga 3.9.90-1 and it seems to work now. These are the new packages that I installed: ekig

Processed: tagging 683992

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 683992 + patch Bug #683992 [python-kiwi] [python-kiwi] RuntimeError: Could not find gazpacho.loader Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 683992: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/

Bug#658739: Broken su/sudo/whatever - breaks systems - up goes the severity

On 2012-10-24 Joerg Jaspert wrote: [...] > Maybe the rebuild without gcrypt is a solution. I don't know, I have > no idea what other functionality then might be missing. Hello, It is not possible currently for Debian to use nettle instead of gcrypt for license reasons. Nettle links against gmp wh

Bug#688982: marked as done (transmageddon: Transcoding does not work)

Your message dated Sat, 3 Nov 2012 16:52:52 + with message-id and subject line Closing #688982 has caused the Debian Bug report #688982, regarding transmageddon: Transcoding does not work to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#688982: Closing #688982

Version: 0.25-1 Fixed in transmageddon 0.25-1. Thanks. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-r

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test, org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

Hi, Here's what I found out so far about this bug. Unsetting the DISPLAY environment variable works around the FTBFS error by skipping the failing Junit tests. However, unsetting DISPLAY is not the preferable/acceptable solution, as it simply skips the failing tests. Check out the build.xml.

Bug#665199: fix for rc bug #665199

Michael Gilbert wrote: >On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:11 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote: >> hello, i've prepared an updated version of slapd package which fix >> the bug #665199 > >Hi, I've just reviewed this, and it looks reasonable. However, the >changelog note is not really descriptive enough: > >

Bug#670405: ekiga: During start up segfault in `libopal.so.3.10.4`

On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 02:43 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > > The original closure report only closed the bug for the version in > > experimental, the bug was still listed as open in unstable: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=ekiga;dist=unstable > > > > reopening is not the way

Bug#689884: Bug#692157: couriergraph: diff for NMU version 0.25-4.2

Hi Jose On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Jose Luis Tallón wrote: > El 02/11/12 20:26, Salvatore Bonaccorso escribió: > >Package: couriergraph > >Version: 0.25-4.1 > >Severity: normal > >Tags: patch pending > > > >Dear maintainer, > > > >I've prepared an NMU for couriergraph (versioned as

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test, org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest, failed

The first failing test is BadSessionStateTest. The first exception in the log is actually expected: [junit] java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 0 [junit] at com.sun.beans.ObjectHandler.dequeueResult(ObjectHandler.java:189) [junit] at java.beans.XMLDecode

Bug#692110: marked as done ([ifupdown] ifupdown renders system unbootable)

Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2012 18:17:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#692110: fixed in ifupdown 0.7.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #692110, regarding [ifupdown] ifupdown renders system unbootable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

Hi, The stack trace led me to suspect the root cause of the issue lies in the java.beans package. I built the bsaf sources and tests with the default jdk (/usr/lib/jvm/default-java -> java-6-openjdk) and then ran the entire testsuite with openjdk-7-jdk by changing the exported JAVA_HOME to

Processed: re: yatex: recommend non-free ptex-jtex

Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #692215 [yatex] yatex: recommend non-free ptex-jtex and list non-existing binary packages texlive-bin gimageview jweblint Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 692215: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692215 Debian

Bug#692215: yatex: recommend non-free ptex-jtex

control: severity -1 important > ptex-jtex Non-free package --> Should be in suggest field to be safe > (non-free can not be in "recommends" but can be in "suggests.") Until the Tech Committee makes a decision on #681419, which will only apply to jessie and later anyway, this is allowable.

Processed: re: CVE-2012-2090 / CVE-2012-2091

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #669024 [simgear] CVE-2012-2090 / CVE-2012-2091 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 669024: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669024 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSU

Bug#682050: fails to connect to server using non default port

I agree with Josh's assessment. As I noted in 668239, different host keys for different ports on the same server are clearly documented in the OpenSSH man page. Hence, the assessment in the initial bugreport and hostkey.patch are clearly wrong. I tested dropping hostkey.patch and this makes paramik

Processed: re: CVE-2012-2090 / CVE-2012-2091

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #669025 [flightgear] CVE-2012-2090 / CVE-2012-2091 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 669025: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669025 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To U

Bug#662746: marked as done (mingw32-ocaml: fails to upgrade from squeeze)

Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2012 19:02:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#662746: fixed in mingw-ocaml 3.12.1+debian3 has caused the Debian Bug report #662746, regarding mingw32-ocaml: fails to upgrade from squeeze to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: tagging 668239

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # This bug appears to have a wheezy tag without reason > # the version info appears to be sufficient > tags 668239 - wheezy Bug #668239 [python-paramiko] host key handling broken when port!=22 Removed tag(s) wheezy. > thanks Stopping processing he

Bug#659489: Info

Hi, I was checking this bug today. I was able to reproduce the bug, but then once I entered some other account info, it didn't appear again... I will try again. Apart from that, the problem you're having about auth errors is not a bug, it's just that you don't have all the information for a succe

Processed: Re: Bug#687693: ca-certificates: Cacert License is missing

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #687693 [ca-certificates] ca-certificates: Cacert License is missing Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > tags -1 pending Bug #687693 [ca-certificates] ca-certificates: Cacert License is missing Added tag(s) pending. -- 687693: http://b

Bug#678786: marked as done (haskell-llvm-base: FTBFS: error: 'class llvm::SMDiagnostic' has no member named 'Print')

Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:05:43 +0100 with message-id <1351976743.6630.17.camel@kirk> and subject line Re: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#678786: Build successful has caused the Debian Bug report #678786, regarding haskell-llvm-base: FTBFS: error: 'class llvm::SMDiagnostic' has no memb

Processed: forcibly merging 638339 692228

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 638339 692228 Bug #638339 [blcr-dkms] blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later Bug #651747 [blcr-dkms] blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later Bug #668348 [blcr-dkms] blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39

Bug#666468: marked as done (xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #666468, regarding xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#666538: marked as done (xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #666468, regarding xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#666564: marked as done (xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #666468, regarding xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#666998: marked as done (xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #666468, regarding xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#667033: marked as done (vim-gtk: Invisible text)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #666468, regarding vim-gtk: Invisible text to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#667073: marked as done (xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #666468, regarding xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#667445: marked as done (xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #666468, regarding xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#667520: marked as done (xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #666468, regarding xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#668182: marked as done ([gnome-terminal] incorrect partial redraw in mc)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #666468, regarding [gnome-terminal] incorrect partial redraw in mc to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#668993: marked as done (libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0: Font rendering corruption?)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #666468, regarding libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0: Font rendering corruption? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#679120: marked as done (libdrm-nouveau1a: text corruption using nouveau (not with video, images or 3d))

Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #666468, regarding libdrm-nouveau1a: text corruption using nouveau (not with video, images or 3d) to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#684632: marked as done (libcairo2 1.12.2-2 creates text display problem for libreoffice)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#666468: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #666468, regarding libcairo2 1.12.2-2 creates text display problem for libreoffice to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#685750: marked as done (IA64 (Itanium) Wheezy, mach64, decommissioned xorg drivers)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:19:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#685750: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.12.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #685750, regarding IA64 (Itanium) Wheezy, mach64, decommissioned xorg drivers to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#691723: marked as done (libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl: New upstream release 0.07)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:18:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#691723: fixed in libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl 0.05~02-2+squeeze1 has caused the Debian Bug report #691723, regarding libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl: New upstream release 0.07 to be marked as done

Bug#681451: gvfs-bin: gvfs-open (via xdg-open) opens pdfs in wrong application

Hi > Norbert: how about trying to bisect this problem by copying into > a fresh user account parts of your dotfiles until you manage to > reproduce the problem? Unfortunately my laptop died on my a while ago and I am still fighting with a new (well, not really, old brick style lenovo), but after

Bug#665199: fix for rc bug #665199

On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:11:13AM -0300, gustavo panizzo wrote: > updated package can be found at > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openldap/openldap_2.4.31-1.1.dsc This is not the correct procedure for an NMU. Please send a debdiff to the bug report. -- Steve Langasek

Bug#687693: ca-certificates: Cacert License is missing

On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 03:28:08PM -0500, Michael Shuler wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > Control: tags -1 pending > (Setting to serious, due to policy violation) > After reading the -legal thread, comments above, the CAcert mailing list > thread, the Fedora explanation, and carefully read

Bug#665199: fix for rc bug #665199

On 11/03/2012 04:34 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:11:13AM -0300, gustavo panizzo > wrote: >> updated package can be found at >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openldap/openldap_2.4.31-1.1.dsc > >> > This is not the correct procedure for an NMU. Please send

Bug#665199: fix for rc bug #665199

"gustavo panizzo " writes: > sending it again > $ debdiff /var/cache/pbuilder/result/slapd_2.4.31-1.1_i386.deb > /var/cache/apt/archives/slapd_2.4.31-1_i386.deb It's the change to the source package, not the binary package, that's important for an NMU, so you have to debdiff the *.dsc files. T

Bug#665199: openldap: diff for NMU version 2.4.31-1.1

tags 665199 + patch tags 665199 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for openldap (versioned as 2.4.31-1.1) attached is the diff between the sources as nmudiff shows Regards. -- 1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333 diff -u openldap-2.4.31/debian/slapd.postinst

Processed: openldap: diff for NMU version 2.4.31-1.1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 665199 + patch Bug #665199 [slapd] slapd: fails to install, remove, distupgrade, and install again Added tag(s) patch. > tags 665199 + pending Bug #665199 [slapd] slapd: fails to install, remove, distupgrade, and install again Added tag(s)

Processed: severity of 689049 is serious

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 689049 serious Bug #689049 [libspeexdsp1] Resampler stops in the middle of run with multiple channels Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 689049: http:

Bug#692119: {cpp, gfortran, gnat}-4.4-doc: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)

Control: tag -1 + pending On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 12:39:53PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: cpp-4.4-doc,gfortran-4.4-doc,gnat-4.4-doc > Version: 4.4.7-1 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > > Hi, > > a test with piuparts revealed that your pack

Processed: Re: {cpp, gfortran, gnat}-4.4-doc: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)

Processing control commands: > tag -1 + pending Bug #692119 [cpp-4.4-doc,gfortran-4.4-doc,gnat-4.4-doc] {cpp, gfortran, gnat}-4.4-doc: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) Added tag(s) pending. -- 692119: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692119 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#665199: openldap: diff for NMU version 2.4.31-1.1

tags 665199 - patch pending thanks On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 01:40:52AM -0300, gustavo panizzo wrote: > I've prepared an NMU for openldap (versioned as 2.4.31-1.1) > attached is the diff between the sources as nmudiff shows Have you tested this patch? Because 'upgrade' is not the argument passe

Processed: Re: Bug#665199: openldap: diff for NMU version 2.4.31-1.1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 665199 - patch pending Bug #665199 [slapd] slapd: fails to install, remove, distupgrade, and install again Removed tag(s) pending and patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 665199: http://bug

Processed: Re: [experimental] cannot install kernel headers

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 573483 692252 Bug #573483 [src:linux] linux-headers in unstable regularly uninstallable due to missing linux-kbuild Bug #598504 [src:linux] [experimental] linux-headers-nnn depends on linux-kbuild-nnn which is unavailable Bug #603066

Processed: Re: [experimental] cannot install kernel headers

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # | Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: > # | > # | hramr...@centrum.cz > # | > # | Technical details of permanent failure: > # | Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the > recipient domain. We