On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 19:16 +, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 15:33 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > The ceph upload in NEW tells:
> > | * Limit archs to build on as leveldb dependency doesn't support all.
> > The leveldb package is clearly not restricted to specific arc
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 21:33 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 19:16 +, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 15:33 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > The ceph upload in NEW tells:
> > > | * Limit archs to build on as leveldb dependency doesn't support all.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:34:07PM +0100, Eckhart Wörner wrote:
> Source: xxdiff
> Severity: wishlist
> User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qt3libs-removal
>
>
Files removal http://bugs.debian.org/678201
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
RFS: http://bugs.debian.org/678200
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
This is strange !
If I manually install *.deb from the launchpad ppa on a fresh wheezy ->
everything is fine and freediams works without any trouble. But if I use the
sid packages -> freediams crashes.
I'm trying to compil a debug version on wheezy to see if I can find something...
Eric, freem
Package: svn-buildpackage
Version: 0.8.4
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After the upgrade of subversion to series 1.7 svn-do fails with
"E: Not in a SVN checkout" because the new subversion format seems to
ship only one .svn directory in the top directory and not
Package: screen
Version: 4.1.0~20120320gitdb59704-3
Severity: serious
See below install log in a pbuilder sid chroot. At the very least, $2
is used unquoted in debconf script.
# aptitude install screen
The following NEW packages will be installed:
screen
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed
tags 676203 patch
thanks
Hello,
I have found a patch on upstream's svn. It's attached. If there is no
response from maintainer, I'm going to upload this one through NMU.
--
Pozdrawiam / Kind regards,
Artur Rona
From: Artur Rona
Description: Ruby 1.9.1 has a "memoisation optimisation" when c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 676203 patch
Bug #676203 [src:ruby-mecab] ruby-mecab: FTBFS: MeCab_wrap.cpp:2252:5: error:
format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact m
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2012 22:02:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678036: fixed in python-networkx 1.7~rc1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #678036,
regarding 1.7~rc1 causes FTBFS in nipype 0.5.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
severity 678203 important
thanks
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:39:32 +0200
Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Package: svn-buildpackage
> Version: 0.8.4
> Severity: serious
No justification for serious, lowering.
> After the upgrade of subversion to series 1.7 svn-do fails with
> "E: Not in a SVN checkout" beca
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 678203 important
Bug #678203 [svn-buildpackage] svn-do: Fails with "E: Not in a SVN checkout"
after subversion upgrade to 1.7.5
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
retitle 666750 Please avoid differences between OS-en detected in the
installer and those offered in GRUB
severity 666750 wishlist
tags 666750 - wheezy sid
thanks
This no longer happens with grub2 1.99-19 ("Add grub-probe to
grub-mount-udeb").
I'm keeping this report as a wish to prevent new oc
Package: icewm-themes
Version: 1.2.26-2
Severity: serious
Justification: §12.5 copyright must say where the upstream sources were obtained
We were looking at this package as a result of a question on #debian and
realised that, on the basis of the information in debian/copyright, we had
no idea whe
On 2012-06-07 20:25, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 20:12:07 +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
>
>> - AFAIK, there is still 50+ FTBFS [3] :/
>>
> Could somebody verify and file those in the debian bts as a first step?
>
> Cheers,
> Julien
>
>
Hi,
Status update on this. Thank
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 677825 Unable to update Twitter status with dependencies from stable
Bug #677825 [tircd] Unable to update Twitter status
Changed Bug title to 'Unable to update Twitter status with dependencies from
stable' from 'Unable to update Twitter s
On 9-Jun-2012, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
| Package: octave-java
| Version: 1.2.8-4
| Severity: grave
| Tags: sid
|
| This version of octave-java completely breaks octave.
|
| For example, if octave-io is also installed, octave miserably fails at launch
| time:
|
| octave: lex.ll :2420 : void h
found 678207 4.1.0~20120320gitdb59704-2
kthxbye
Hi,
Yann Dirson wrote:
> Package: screen
> Version: 4.1.0~20120320gitdb59704-3
> Severity: serious
>
> See below install log in a pbuilder sid chroot.
I must admit that I could not reproduce this error, neither with dpkg
-i nor with aptitude insta
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 678207 4.1.0~20120320gitdb59704-2
Bug #678207 [screen] screen: (uncaught) compare-version errors at install
Marked as found in versions screen/4.1.0~20120320gitdb59704-2.
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2012 03:35:27 +0200
with message-id <4fe128df@debian.org>
and subject line evolution: Can't install because of conflicting libcogl
dependencies
has caused the Debian Bug report #671883,
regarding evolution: Can't install because of conflicting libcogl dependencie
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2012 03:37:02 +0200
with message-id <4fe1293e.4080...@debian.org>
and subject line /usr/bin/evolution: Evolution does not start at all
has caused the Debian Bug report #676134,
regarding /usr/bin/evolution: Evolution does not start at all
to be marked as done.
This m
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 673249 pending
Bug #673249 [fcitx-mozc] fcitx-mozc: please add "Recommends: fcitx"
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 676724 pending
Bug #676724 [mozc] [Patch] Fcitx support patch for mozc
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 676298 pending
Bug #676298 [ui
Hello,
Since this is python compiled extension, shouldn't we actually use
dh_numpy thing to get the correct ABI dependency?
--
Regards,
Dmitrijs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2012 03:24:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#676996: fixed in mozc 1.5.1090.102-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #676996,
regarding uim-mozc stops working with multiarched uim
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:02:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#669434: fixed in gzip 1.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #669434,
regarding gzip: FTBFS: ../../lib/fchdir.c:149:15: error: storage size of
'statbuf' isn't known
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:09:22 +0200
with message-id <4fe14cf2.3000...@debian.org>
and subject line close a few bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #658780,
regarding evolution: Evolution does not show any certificate authorities
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:09:22 +0200
with message-id <4fe14cf2.3000...@debian.org>
and subject line close a few bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #658780,
regarding No root CA certificates in certificate store
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Package: barry
Version: 0.18.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
Hi,
barry/0.18.3-2 added a dependency on ppp for barrydesktop.
Unfortunately, ppp is not available on kfreebsd and this change
renders the package uninstallable on that architecture.
barrydesktop/kfreebsd-amd64 unsatisfiable
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 677620 with 678233
Bug #677620 [release.debian.org] transition: GNOME 3.4: evolution 3.4
677620 was not blocked by any bugs.
677620 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 677620: 678233
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2012 05:48:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#669500: fixed in pcsxr 1.9.92-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #669500,
regarding pcsxr: FTBFS: libpthread.so.0: could not read symbols: Invalid
operation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2012 05:48:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#661666: fixed in pcsxr 1.9.92-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #661666,
regarding pcsxr problems with dynamic recompilation and ppc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
I noticed that Launchpad packages are built with gcc 4.6, while sid are built
with gcc 4.7.
Installed gcc4.7, compilation in debug -> all is fine
Installed gcc4.7, Qt 4.8.2, compilation in release + installation -> all is fine
This bug does not seem to be linked with the upstream and/or debian f
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 568362 + pending
Bug #568362 [usbip-source] usbip-source: fails to build on 2.6.32
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
568362: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
"John W. Eaton" writes:
> I'd like to help debug this problem but I need some help.
Thanks for volunteering!
> I need to be able to install a debug version of Octave (preferably the
> current development sources) and build the Java package also with
> debugging symbols. I'm using Debian testin
101 - 134 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
