Bug#629589: marked as done (libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit: causes segfaults in using packages)

Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2011 07:02:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#629589: fixed in cyrus-sasl2 2.1.24~rc1.dfsg1+cvs2011-05-23-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #629589, regarding libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit: causes segfaults in using packages to be marked as done. This mea

Bug#629572: marked as done (haskell-agda-doc: not installable in sid)

Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2011 07:47:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#629572: fixed in agda 2.2.10-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #629572, regarding haskell-agda-doc: not installable in sid to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#628952: minidlna: Possible unknown copyright status of hardcoded image blobs in source code

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 19:20, Bernhard R. Link wrote: > * Benoīt Knecht [110606 11:57]: >> I had a look at these, and I'm pretty sure they're not eligible for >> copyright protection (a white 'N' on a blue background is not nearly >> creative enough). So I don't think there's a problem there; the

Processed: severity of 629310 is serious, severity of 617763 is serious, block 629310 with 617763

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 629310 serious Bug #629310 [libmetacity-private0] libmetacity-private0: button_layout for the window decorations does not work anymore Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > severity 617763 serious Bug #617763 [compiz-gtk] /usr/bin/g

Bug#527719: marked as done (geordi: FTBFS: template-hsc.h:4:19: error: HsFFI.h: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:31:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#629549: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #527719, regarding geordi: FTBFS: template-hsc.h:4:19: error: HsFFI.h: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#530485: marked as done (Unmet dependencies in libghc6-*)

Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:31:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#629549: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #530485, regarding Unmet dependencies in libghc6-* to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#539678: marked as done (mindi/mondo: does not create boot CD with new grub2)

Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:34:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#628875: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #539678, regarding mindi/mondo: does not create boot CD with new grub2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#605261: marked as done (mindi: Uses /usr/lib/ for varying files (constructs the whole rescue image there))

Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:34:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#628875: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #605261, regarding mindi: Uses /usr/lib/ for varying files (constructs the whole rescue image there) to be marked as done. This means

Bug#628456: marked as done (CVE-2011-0766: cryptographic weakness)

Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:03:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#628456: fixed in erlang 1:14.b.3-dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #628456, regarding CVE-2011-0766: cryptographic weakness to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#628324: marked as done (funitroots: FTBFS: ERROR: lazy loading failed for package 'fUnitRoots')

Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:34:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#628324: fixed in funitroots 2100.76-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #628324, regarding funitroots: FTBFS: ERROR: lazy loading failed for package 'fUnitRoots' to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#617763: Bug#629207: metacity: Missing window control buttons

Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 10:21 +0200, Daniel Huhardeaux a écrit : > FYI I already opened a bug about this problem against compiz-gtk in > march. See bug 617763 In any case this needs fixing in compiz. I’ll add the necessary Breaks in libmetacity-private0 when compiz is fixed, but this is what

Bug#626259: marked as done (libkml: FTBFS: [ FAILED ] CoordinatesTest.TestSerializeMany)

Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:51:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#626259: fixed in libkml 1.3.0~r863-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #626259, regarding libkml: FTBFS: [ FAILED ] CoordinatesTest.TestSerializeMany to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#607713: marked as done (ifupdown-clean: use explicit depends to not break network)

Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:20:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#607713: fixed in ifupdown 0.7~alpha4 has caused the Debian Bug report #607713, regarding ifupdown-clean: use explicit depends to not break network to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#626170: libstrongswan: dependencies aren't tight enough

tag 626170 - patch thanks Hi, Alright, after asking on #strongswan irc channel, it seems that these libraries are not stable, so I guess here a .symbols file is useless here. So the packages should depends on the same exact version of libstrongswan, the same must be done for the plugins. As thes

Processed: Re: libstrongswan: dependencies aren't tight enough

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 626170 - patch Bug #626170 [libstrongswan] libstrongswan: dependencies aren't tight enough Removed tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 626170: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport

Bug#629656: ncbi-blast+: FTBFS everywhere for assorted reasons

Package: ncbi-blast+ Version: 2.2.25-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source All the automated builds of ncbi-blast+ have failed; i386 got farthest, but ran into an embarrassing failure to account for binary-only builds. Other architectures, particularly the non-Linux ones,

Bug#629657: ace: FTBFS: libACE.so: undefined reference to `clock_gettime'

Source: ace Version: 6.0.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > g++ -fvisibility=hidden -fvisib

Bug#629658: crossroads: FTBFS: start.cc:22: undefined reference to `pthread_create'

Source: crossroads Version: 2.65-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > /usr/bin/g++-4.6 -O3 -g

Bug#629661: dk-milter: FTBFS: dk.c:(.text+0x8b): undefined reference to `__res_query'

Source: dk-milter Version: 1.0.0.dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > gcc -o dk-filter -lp

Bug#629663: dkim-milter: FTBFS: dkim-keys.c:(.text+0x13e): undefined reference to `__dn_expand'

Source: dkim-milter Version: 2.8.2.dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > gcc -o dkim-filter

Bug#629664: dnprogs: FTBFS: ../libdaemon/libdnet_daemon.so: undefined reference to `crypt'

Source: dnprogs Version: 2.56 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > g++ -o fal -g -O2 -fno-rtti -f

Bug#629666: google-authenticator: FTBFS: google-authenticator.c:154: undefined reference to `dlopen'

Source: google-authenticator Version: 20110413.68230188bdc7-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part:

Bug#629665: gcc-3.3: FTBFS: ld: cannot find crti.o: No such file or directory

Source: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.6ds1-23 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > gcc -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_

Bug#629667: ike: FTBFS: libith.cpp:118: undefined reference to `clock_gettime'

Source: ike Version: 2.1.7+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. I also not that the build log is not partic

Bug#629668: kdebase-runtime: FTBFS: fish.cpp:370: undefined reference to `openpty'

Source: kdebase-runtime Version: 4:4.6.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > /usr/bin/c++ -fP

Bug#629669: kdebase-workspace: FTBFS: kwinglutils_funcs.cpp:125: undefined reference to `dlsym'

Source: kdebase-workspace Version: 4:4.6.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > /usr/bin/c++ -

Bug#629671: libpuzzle: FTBFS: vector_ops.c:74: undefined reference to `sqrt'

Source: libpuzzle Version: 0.9-4 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > gcc -shared .libs/puzzle.o

Bug#629670: libpar-packer-perl: FTBFS: main.c:79: undefined reference to `pthread_atfork'

Source: libpar-packer-perl Version: 1.008-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > cc main.o my_par

Bug#629672: pennmush: FTBFS: funmath.c:2350: undefined reference to `sqrt'

Source: pennmush Version: 1.8.2p8-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > gcc -L/usr/local/lib -g

Bug#629673: screader: FTBFS: process.c:(.text+0x77d): undefined reference to `crypt'

Source: screader Version: 1.8-5.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > gcc -s -o screader screade

Bug#628272: Release of this patch?

I've just hit this bug in one of my new packages; when do you think 1.4.3 of m-d-h will be released? Cheers James -- James Page Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Team signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#629675: Wrong init script headers

Package: strongswan-starter Version: 4.5.2-1 Severity: serious Tag: patch Hi, Lintian is complaining about 2 things in the init file: E: strongswan-starter: init.d-script-missing-dependency-on-remote_fs etc/init.d/ipsec: required-start E: strongswan-starter: init.d-script-missing-dependency-on-

Bug#629677: sysvinit: FTBFS: sulogin.c:607: undefined reference to `crypt'

Source: sysvinit Version: 2.88dsf-13.7 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > cc sulogin.o -lsel

Bug#629564: fenics: not installable in sid

Hi Ralf, Thanks for your report. On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Ralf Treinen wrote: > fenics is not installable in sid on any architecture. On amd64 (I didn't > check the other architectures) this is the case since May 19. Explanation: > > fenics (= 11.5-1) depends on syfi-doc (= 0.6.2.dfsg-1)

Bug#629678: xtradius: FTBFS: auth.c:233: undefined reference to `crypt'

Source: xtradius Version: 1.2.1-beta2-6 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > gcc -o radiusd radi

Bug#629679: zthreads: FTBFS: conftest.c:33: undefined reference to `_ftime'

Source: zthreads Version: 2.3.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > configure:5441: checking f

Processed: tagging 629675

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 629675 + patch Bug #629675 [strongswan-starter] Wrong init script headers Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 629675: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629675 De

Bug#556917: marked as done (FTBFS with binutils-gold)

Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:30:41 +0200 with message-id <4def8791.8040...@debian.org> and subject line FTBFS with binutils-gold has caused the Debian Bug report #556917, regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#628272: Release of this patch?

On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:15:39 +0100, James Page wrote: > I've just hit this bug in one of my new packages; when do you think > 1.4.3 of m-d-h will be released? I can release a 1.4.3 version w/ this simple change before tomorrow morning. (my initial plan was to work on some others reported - but mi

Bug#629682: bzrtools: FTBFS: ImportError: No module named deprecated_graph

Source: bzrtools Version: 2.4.0~bzr767-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > 0.794 opening work

Bug#629683: cheesetracker: FTBFS: common/components/audio/sample_data.h:124:2: error: 'ptrdiff_t' does not name a type

Source: cheesetracker Version: 0.9.15.3-4 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This has probably been broken by the

Bug#628272: Release of this patch?

On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 16:39 +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > I can release a 1.4.3 version w/ this simple change before tomorrow > morning. > (my initial plan was to work on some others reported - but minor - > issues > before doing an upload) I can wait for a bit; I have some other packages t

Bug#629684: csh: FTBFS: vis.h:33:2: error: #warning "Deprecated header, use or libbsd-overlay.pc instead." [-Werror=cpp]

Source: csh Version: 20110502-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. The error is self-explanatory, but maybe trea

Bug#629686: djplay: FTBFS: mp3map.cpp:289:19: error: no matching function for call to 'stat::stat(const char*&, stat*)'

Source: djplay Version: 0.5.0-3.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > x86_64-linux-gnu-g++

Bug#628242: marked as done (nordugrid-arc: FTBFS: arc_wrap.cpp:3132:13: error: 'ptrdiff_t' does not name a type)

Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2011 14:51:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#628242: fixed in nordugrid-arc 1.0.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #628242, regarding nordugrid-arc: FTBFS: arc_wrap.cpp:3132:13: error: 'ptrdiff_t' does not name a type to be marked as done. This means

Bug#629692: nfs-utils: FTBFS: gssapi_ext.h:398:5: error: expected ')' before 'gss_buffer_t'

Source: krb5 Version: 1.9.1+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, the package nfs-utils failed to build on amd64 with the following error (which I consider a bug in krb5; please re-assign to nfs-utils if not) : Relevant part: > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../supp

Bug#629693: spim: FTBFS: ../CPU/spim-utils.c:117:7: error: invalid use of void expression

Source: spim Version: 8.0+dfsg-5 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > cc -Wl,--as-needed -I. -I..

Bug#629694: tcptrace: FTBFS: print.c:380:41: error: 'struct tcphdr' has no member named 'th_off'

Source: tcptrace Version: 6.6.7-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > gcc -O2 -g -O2 -DGUNZIP="\

Bug#629696: wzdftpd: FTBFS: gcc: error: Note: No such file or directory

Source: wzdftpd Version: 0.8.3-6.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[4]: Entering directo

Bug#629698: libblocksruntime: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find crti.o: No such file or directory

Source: libblocksruntime Version: 0.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[1]: Entering di

Bug#629699: webhelpers: FTBFS: test_distance_of_time_in_words fails.

Source: webhelpers Version: 1.3-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ==

Bug#629700: pd-bassemu: FTBFS: bassemu~.c:5:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-bassemu Version: 0.3-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh -

Bug#629701: pd-beatpipe: FTBFS: beatpipe.c:26:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-beatpipe Version: 0.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh

Bug#629702: pd-boids: FTBFS: boids2d.c:20:22: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-boids Version: 1.1.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh b

Bug#629703: pd-bsaylor: FTBFS: aenv~.c:18:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-bsaylor Version: 0.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh b

Bug#629704: pd-cxc: FTBFS: ENV.c:5:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-cxc Version: 0.5.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh bui

Bug#629705: pd-cyclone: FTBFS: hammer/accum.c:8:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-cyclone Version: 0.1~alpha55-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[2]: Entering

Bug#629707: pd-ekext: FTBFS: cup.c:1:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-ekext Version: 0.1.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh b

Bug#629710: pd-ggee: FTBFS: control/constant.c:4:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-ggee Version: 0.26-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh --w

Bug#629706: pd-earplug: FTBFS: earplug~.c:9:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-earplug Version: 0.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh -

Bug#629708: pd-ext13: FTBFS: catch13~.c:7:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-ext13 Version: 0.17.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh

Bug#629709: pd-freeverb: FTBFS: freeverb~.c:34:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-freeverb Version: 1.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh

Bug#629712: pd-iemambi: FTBFS: ambi_decode.c:6:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-iemambi Version: 0.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[1]: Entering director

Bug#629711: pd-hcs: FTBFS: canvas_name.c:3:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-hcs Version: 0.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh --wit

Bug#629713: pd-iemmatrix: FTBFS: iemmatrix.h:54:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-iemmatrix Version: 0.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[1]: Entering direct

Bug#629714: pd-iemnet: FTBFS: iemnet.h:35:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-iemnet Version: 0.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > fakeroot debian/rules bina

Bug#629715: pd-markex: FTBFS: abs~.c:7:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-markex Version: 0.85-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh b

Bug#629717: pd-mjlib: FTBFS: about.c:6:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-mjlib Version: 0.1.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh b

Bug#629716: pd-maxlib: FTBFS: allow.c:25:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-maxlib Version: 1.5.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh

Bug#629718: pd-motex: FTBFS: getenv.c:33:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-motex Version: 1.1.4-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh -

Bug#629589: Causes sendmail to crash, too

On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 08:51:35AM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > first let me thank you for reporting the bugs in GSSAPI and for > patience :). You've been most helpful. Thanks for your quick response. I very much appreciate it. > I've just uploaded version with patch from upstream bugzilla applie

Bug#629693: spim: FTBFS: ../CPU/spim-utils.c:117:7: error: invalid use of void expression

There's a new version of spim upstream, so I'll work on packaging that. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#629719: thunar-thumbnailers: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libexo-0.3-dev (>= 0.3.2)

Source: thunar-thumbnailers Version: 0.4.1-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#629720: srcinst: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libghc6-unix-dev

Source: srcinst Version: 0.8.10 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌───

Bug#629721: libmiglayout-java: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libswt-gtk-3.5-java

Source: libmiglayout-java Version: 3.7.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629723: libfsoresource: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libvala-dev (>= 0.7.10)

Source: libfsoresource Version: 0.1.1~git20100517-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌───

Bug#629722: epiphany-browser: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: gir-repository-dev

Source: epiphany-browser Version: 2.30.6-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629724: libstring-errf-perl: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: perl (>= 5.13.4) but 5.12.3-7 is to be installed

Source: libstring-errf-perl Version: 0.006-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#629725: twidge: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libghc6-unix-dev, libghc6-filepath-dev, libghc6-utf8-string-dev

Source: twidge Version: 1.0.8.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌───

Bug#629727: libextractor: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libmagick++9-dev

Source: libextractor Version: 1:0.5.23+dfsg-7 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌─

Bug#629728: hpodder: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libghc6-unix-dev, libghc6-filepath-dev

Source: hpodder Version: 1.1.5.0+nmu2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌─

Bug#629726: kismet: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libmagick9-dev

Source: kismet Version: 2008-05-R1-4.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629729: gtkrsync: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libghc6-unix-dev

Source: gtkrsync Version: 1.0.4 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌───

Bug#629730: firmware-free: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: linux-support-2.6.38-1

Source: firmware-free Version: 3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#629731: freehdl: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: g++-4.3

Source: freehdl Version: 0.0.7-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#629733: gwt: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libswt-gtk-3.5-java, libswt-gtk-3.5-java-gcj

Source: gwt Version: 1.6.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#629732: pymecavideo: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: rsvg

Source: pymecavideo Version: 5.5-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629734: gcc-avr: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: gcc-4.3-source (>= 4.3.5)

Source: gcc-avr Version: 1:4.3.5-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629735: bzflag: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: xlibmesa-gl-dev, libglu1-xorg-dev

Source: bzflag Version: 2.0.16.20100405 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌───

Bug#629736: libiscwt-java: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libswt-gtk-3.5-java

Source: libiscwt-java Version: 5.2.20091102-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌─

Bug#629737: ganeti-htools: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libghc6-parallel-dev (< 3)

Source: ganeti-htools Version: 0.3.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629738: grub: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: gcc-4.3, gcc-4.3-multilib

Source: grub Version: 0.97-65 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌─

Bug#629739: libgsm0710mux: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libvala-dev (>= 0.8.1)

Source: libgsm0710mux Version: 0.9.1+git20100322-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629740: lbdb: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libvformat1-dev

Source: lbdb Version: 0.37 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629741: picprog: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libstdc++6-4.3-dev

Source: picprog Version: 1.9.0-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629742: gpsbabel: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: libqt4-dev (<= 4:4.7.0~beta1) but 4:4.7.3-1 is to be installed

Source: gpsbabel Version: 1.4.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌─

Bug#629743: libwww-google-auth-clientlogin-perl: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: perl (>= 5.14) but 5.12.3-7 is to be installed

Source: libwww-google-auth-clientlogin-perl Version: 0.04-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: >

Bug#629744: trac-bzr: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: bzr (< 2.4.0~beta1-2) but 2.4.0~beta3-2 is to be installed

Source: trac-bzr Version: 0.4.2+bzr117-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#629745: libcgi-application-plugin-tt-perl: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: perl-modules (< 5.12) but 5.12.3-7 is to be installed

Source: libcgi-application-plugin-tt-perl Version: 1.05-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌─

Bug#629746: tango-icon-theme: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libmagick9-dev

Source: tango-icon-theme Version: 0.8.90-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

  1   2   3   >