Le vendredi 29 oct. 2010 à 15:02:37 (+0200), Julien Cristau a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 06:45:52 +0200, Julien Valroff wrote:
>
> > tags 385760 + pending
> > thanks
> >
> > Le jeudi 28 oct. 2010 à 00:55:18 (+0200), Martin Zobel-Helas a écrit :
> > > Hi,
> >
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > > in
Your message dated Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:32:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#601585: fixed in weborf 0.12.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #601585,
regarding weborf: DoS on malformed requests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
It seems like Grub.cfg is also using proper drive by UUID.
menuentry 'Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64' --class debian
--class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os {
insmod part_msdos
insmod ext2
set root='(hd0,msdos5)'
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set dec7
Version: 2.0.7-1
This looks like a duplicate of #451659 which was fixed in 2.0.7-1, so
I'm closing as such. Feel free to reopen if this is still reproducible
with newer versions.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Your message dated Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:29:37 -0600
with message-id <20101029162936.ga29...@dannf.org>
and subject line dup of #451659?
has caused the Debian Bug report #601386,
regarding nano corrupts script files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Package: ia32-sun-java6-bin
Version: 6.22-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I'm running a 64-bit system but I have an application that needs the 32-bit
java. This application fails. When I run "java -version" I get "./java: 1:
Syntax error: "(" unexpected" returned. The
Hi there,
I tested this and I wasn't able to see any problem. The differences:
1) some of my packages are more recent than yourse (all from squeeze, so an
aptitude upgrade should put you with the same package versions as me);
2) I'm at i686, the problem might be affecting amd64.
Best regards
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:08:59AM -0500, Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
> It seems like Grub.cfg is also using proper drive by UUID.
>
> menuentry 'Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64' --class debian
> --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os {
> insmod part_msdos
> insmod ext2
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 568971 serious
Bug #568971 [modemmanager] /usr/sbin/modem-manager: modem manager rapidly fills
up daemon.log
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
56
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Lennart Sorensen
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:08:59AM -0500, Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
>> It seems like Grub.cfg is also using proper drive by UUID.
>>
>> menuentry 'Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64' --class debian
>> --class gnu-linux --class gnu
This bug seems to be a candidate for NMU. I have some free time
and I am offering to help fix it. Please let me know if this bug
is already been worked on or if it's okay to NMU the package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Your message dated Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:32:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#598305: fixed in teamspeak-server 2.0.24.1+debian-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #598305,
regarding teamspeak-server: CVE-2010-3383: insecure library loading
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
tags 599937 patch
thanks
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 05:56:38PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: mysql-5.1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> 5.1.51 fixes eight security issues. It has already been uploaded
> to experimental, so depending on the amou
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 599937 patch
Bug #599937 [mysql-5.1] mysql-5.1: 5.1.51 fixes several vulnerabilities
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
599937: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Package: monotone
Version: 0.48-2
Severity: serious
I noticed this error today, too. I'm not sure if it is caused by the
libsqlite3-0 upgrade (which I did two days ago), because I no longer have
the old package.
Here is the debug log of running test-convert-mtn.t of the Mercurial test
suite:
be
Package: viewvc
Version: 1.1.5-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Upstream version 1.1.6 includes a fix for some nasty python errors. We are
hitting the bug on lots of places, which renders the package unusuable. More
details can be found in the upstre
Package: heartbeat
Version: 2.1.3-6lenny4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
Heartbeat doesn't seem to play nice with ipv6.
It segfaults while trying to add an IPv6 address.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.6
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable
I could install this package without any problem. Here is the log:
[humitos] [~]$ sudo apt-get upgrade
Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho
Creando árbol de dependencias
Leyendo la información de estado... Hecho
Los siguientes paquetes se han retenido:
apt apt-utils aptitude debtags goplay libapt-
I don't get a blinking screen, I get the following:
j...@hathor:~$ gnome-shell --replace &
[1] 3493
j...@hathor:~$ do_wait: drmWaitVBlank returned -1, IRQs don't seem to
be working correctly.
Try adjusting the vblank_mode configuration parameter.
Shell kill
Package: gparted
Version: 0.6.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: fixed-upstream
At https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628863
Frieder Ferlemann reported:
On an IBM T42 notebook gparted reproducibly (tried 3 times with
varying layouts) crashes when rearranging partitions leaving the
system i
Package: gparted
Version: 0.6.2-1
On Do, 21 Okt 2010, Michael Fladischer wrote:
> I'll contact debian-volatile and debian-release about this issue.
> So far I can only give this advise: Don't upgrade to 1.5 on other
> installations to keep compatibility. Sorry ...
No, better solution - remove the xul-ext-sync package and install i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 601816 network-manager
Bug #601816 [network-manager-gnome] Network manager in Gnome and Wired
connection
Bug reassigned from package 'network-manager-gnome' to 'network-manager'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions network-manager-
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:10:35 +0100
"Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
> Are you actually experiencing this in 2.6.32-26, or just assuming it's
> affected because the US-CERT page says it is?
No, it's shame, I don't check debian/changelog... very sorry for all.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 601747 2.6.32-26
Bug#601747: RDS protocol vulnerability
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 2.6.32-26, send any further explanations to
Hideki Yamane
> thanks
Stopping pr
close 601747 2.6.32-26
thanks
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Sat, 30 Oct 2010 01:32:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#601817: fixed in gparted 0.7.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #601817,
regarding gparted crashes applying move to right of more than one logical
partition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Sat, 30 Oct 2010 01:32:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#601818: fixed in gparted 0.7.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #601818,
regarding gparted crashes at start: glibmm-ERROR **
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Package: imagemagick
Version: 7:6.3.7.9.dfsg2-1~lenny3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
ImageMagick reads several configuration files[0] from the current
working directory. Unfortunately, this allows local attackers to execute
arbitrary code if ImageMagick is run
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 601824 + confirmed
Bug #601824 [imagemagick] imagemagick: reads config files from cwd
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
601824: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
Hi Jakub!
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> ImageMagick reads several configuration files[0] from the current working
> directory. Unfortunately, this allows local attackers to execute arbitrary
> code if ImageMagick is run from an untrusted directory.
I have confirmed it her
feel free to NMU. and thanks.
On 10/30/10, Jari Aalto wrote:
> This bug seems to be a candidate for NMU. I have some free time
> and I am offering to help fix it. Please let me know if this bug
> is already been worked on or if it's okay to NMU the package.
>
>
>
--
Emfox Zhou
GnuPG Public Ke
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:54:55PM +0200, Laurent Caron wrote:
> Package: heartbeat
> Version: 2.1.3-6lenny4
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Heartbeat doesn't seem to play nice with ipv6.
>
> It segfaults while trying to add an IPv6 address.
Hi Laurent
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 02:11:57PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:54:55PM +0200, Laurent Caron wrote:
> could you give a little bit more detail on the configuration
> that you have that segfaults?
Hi Simon,
Here you go:
$ /etc/ha.d/resource.d/IPv6addr abcd:abc:abc:a::b/6
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 08:18:33AM +0200, Laurent Caron wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 02:11:57PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:54:55PM +0200, Laurent Caron wrote:
> > could you give a little bit more detail on the configuration
> > that you have that segfaults?
>
> H
Package: openoffice.org-impress
Version: 1:3.2.1-7
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Open
http://media.eduscol.education.fr/file/seminaire_STI2D/56/7/STI2D_BacSTI2D_157567.odp
Export in PDF/A-1a.
The message "export to PDF" is displaying in status bar and OOo freezes wi
Hi Alexander,
On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Sure, I rescheduled them to delayed/15. But if you would rather provide
> backports and not release the package, wouldn't it make sense to cancel
> it alltogether?
I am going to co-maintain ntop with Jordan. As you have
Could you please try to launch gdebi-kde in a console window to
eventually get a backtrace, or a meaningful log? Thanks!
--
.''`.
: :' : Luca Falavigna
`. `'
`-
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi!
I just tried to bring this package in shape for the release. Changelog
reads as follows:
iceowl-l10n (1.0~b1+debian.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* QA upload.
* New upstream release:
* These languages packs support iceowl 1.0~bX
(Closes: #566396, #588696, #595621, #588897)
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-26
Severity: critical
Tags: security, patch
Hi,
You know, RDS protocol vulnerability was found in Linux kernel.
US-Cert says (http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/362983)
> The RDS protocol implementation of Linux kernels 2.6.30 through
> 2.6.38-rc8 contain a local
xapt is in the NEW queue, aimed at experimental, but a lot of changes
needed to be made to the version that is currently part of
pdebuild-cross. Therefore, I do not think it suitable to push xapt as a
replacement for apt-cross as a fix for this particular bug. The two
programs are trying to do a si
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 600826 23.2+1-4
Bug #600826 [src:emacs23] emacs23: FTBFS: E: Package 'mailx' has no
installation candidate
Bug Marked as found in versions emacs23/23.2+1-4.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
6
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 601747 + pending
Bug #601747 [linux-2.6] RDS protocol vulnerability
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 600826 + patch
Bug #600826 [src:emacs23] emacs23: FTBFS: E: Package 'mailx' has no
installation candidate
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
600826: http://bugs.debian.org/cg
tags 600826 + patch
thanks
On 2010-10-20 14:25 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Source: emacs23
> Version: 23.2+1-5
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
>
> Hi,
>
> you're build-depending on a virtual package, mailx, which isn't blessed
> by policy. That's not supported by the buildds (#5959
Package: postgresql-client
Version: 8.3.12-0lenny1
Severity: serious
During a general conversation about readline licensing, I noticed that psql
links to both libreadline (GPL v2+) and libssl (BSD-like, incompatible with
the GPL), thus ending up with the terms of both licenses applying. My
reason
Your message dated Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:32:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#592024: fixed in glib2.0 2.27.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #592024,
regarding glib2.0: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: /bin/bash: C: command not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Package: fuss-launcher
Version: 0.4-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
fuss-launcher does not work with python-xapian currently in squeeze.
Trying to search anything gives no reply and this on stderr:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/fusslauncher/ui.py", line 529,
Package: freeimage
Version: 3.10.0-2
Severity: grave
Source/LibTIFF/tif_config.h has:
#define SIZEOF_LONG 4
tif_config.h is generated by tiff's configure script, and as such is
arch-specific.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:32:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#601760: fixed in fuss-launcher 0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #601760,
regarding Does not work with new Xapian libs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
severity 601685 important
On 29/10/10 06:17, tony mancill wrote:
> I've applied the patch and committed the update to the packaging repo.
cool, thanks :)
> I'm not sure I agree with the severity - the current package isn't completely
> unusable, is it? (Your bug report says "mostly useless.")
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 601685 important
Bug #601685 [libbsf-java] libbsf-java: package does not support optional libs
(as the description claims)
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> On 29/10/10 06:17, tony mancill wrote:
Unknown command or malformed ar
Package: isdnutils-base
Version: 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-5
Severity: grave
Hi.
During upgrade and configure, the following happens:
Setting up isdnutils-base (1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-5) ...
dpkg: error processing isdnutils-base (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installation script returned e
Did
apt-get source autolog
make
1) could reproduce the problem with ./autolog -d -o
2) could NOT reproduce the problem with gdb --args ./autolog -d -o
:-( Anything else I should do?
--
Marcos Marado
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
severity 601768 normal
thanks
Sven,
thank you for the bug report.
I've only just taken over isdnutils with this release. There's still
many things that need to be worked out in isdnutils and I'm sure
there'll be more breakage before that's done. Please bear with me.
I'll turn off "abort on e
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 601768 normal
Bug #601768 [isdnutils-base] does not configure during upgrade
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
601768: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
On Oct 29, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 23:02:23 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> > Apparently libgpod-common is using libgobject too, in a binary run from
> > udev rules. So that makes another reason for moving libgobject to /lib -
> > maybe even in squeeze, if this is cons
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 23:02:23 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Apparently libgpod-common is using libgobject too, in a binary run from
> udev rules. So that makes another reason for moving libgobject to /lib -
> maybe even in squeeze, if this is considered RC.
>
The way to fix that for squeeze
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 06:45:52 +0200, Julien Valroff wrote:
> tags 385760 + pending
> thanks
>
> Le jeudi 28 oct. 2010 à 00:55:18 (+0200), Martin Zobel-Helas a écrit :
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> > in the default configuration of dspam, if daemon gets enabled, the
> > daemon wants to listen o
Hi
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 01:01:17PM +0100, Marcos Marado wrote:
> Did
> apt-get source autolog
> make
> 1) could reproduce the problem with ./autolog -d -o
> 2) could NOT reproduce the problem with gdb --args ./autolog -d -o
>
> :-( Anything else I should do?
Same to me.
I follow the inst
Your message dated Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:32:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#595559: fixed in freeimage 3.10.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #595559,
regarding freeimage: should this package be orphaned?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:32:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#595560: fixed in freeimage 3.10.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #595560,
regarding freeimage: multiple vulnerabilities in embedded code copies
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:32:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#601002: fixed in freeimage 3.10.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #601002,
regarding libfreeimage3: No mention of embedded libraries in copyright file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:32:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#601762: fixed in freeimage 3.10.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #601762,
regarding freeimage: hardcodes arch-specific values from i386
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
tags 601712 pending
thanks
This is now fixed in alioth. I'll upload in a week or when NETGEN
meshing is working, whichever comes first.
-Adam
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:49 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Package: src:salome
> Version: 5.1.3-11
> Severity: serious
>
> Because graphviz is only Bu
Package: autolog
Severity: normal
Hi,
I could get a segfault by simply running './autolog -d -o', even by running
'./autolog -d -o -n' which does not even try to kill processes...
So I don't know if this is the same case as the original submitter as I
didn't have to wait for any warning before g
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 553502 + patch
Bug #553502 [autolog] autolog exits on Segmentation Fault
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
553502: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=553502
Deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 601747 + moreinfo
Bug #601747 [linux-2.6] RDS protocol vulnerability
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
601747: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601747
Debia
tag 601747 + moreinfo
thanks
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 18:07 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-26
> You know, RDS protocol vulnerability was found in Linux kernel.
> US-Cert says (http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/362983)
>
> > The RDS protocol implementation of Linux
What I don't understand is that in squezze the fstab shows:
/etc/fstab
# /boot was on /dev/sda5 during installation
UUID=dec79ed9-b96a-47e4-81f0-7e32735b5057 /boot ext2
defaults0 2
# /boot2 was on /dev/sdb1 during installation
UUID=bb0512c5-6de6-4164-a7af-4312a4718ce3 /boo
70 matches
Mail list logo
