Mark wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:42:19 +0100
> Brice Goglin wrote:
>
>
>> Don't be so sure. Please send your config and log.
>>
>
> Here we are.
>
> Sorry for the last mail, as noted before, the system behaves unreliable,
> you never know which command you trigger while typing...
Are
Hi,
I'd prefer not to install pkgs coming from experimental 2.24 'cause I
would mess up sid as you stated.
I've no problem to wait for gnome 2.24 in unstable, hoping to see it soon.
Regards
Massimo G.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 3.0
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
[r...@v200:~]38# apt-get update ; dpkg -l|fgrep openoffice
Hit http://debian.co.il unstable Release.gpg
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org testing Release.gpg
Ign http://ftp.de.d
Goglin wrote:
> you running X packages from testing or unstable ? If you have libxi6
> 1.2.0 from unstable, does it help if you downgrade it back to testing
> (1.1.4) ?
I get this from dpkg -la regarding libxi.
||/ NameVersion Description
+++-===-=-
Hello,
this is obviously duplicate bug of #515091 in root-system-common
package. The problem is that the lenny version of root-system-common did
not get built properly. Simple temporary fix is to download the sid
version of root-system-common and install it manually via dpkg
(fortunatelly
Package: glibc
Version: 2.9-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of glibc_2.9-1 on mayr by sbuild/mips 99.999
> Build started at 20090218-1947
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: gettext, make (>=
Package: openoffice.org-core
Version: 1:2.4.1-17+b1
Severity: grave
File: openoffice.org
Justification: renders package unusable
Launching openoffice gives the following error :
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: 214:
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/../basis-link/program/pagein: not found
[Java fra
Looks also like there is a dependancy problem.
I'll try to remove and reinstall everything, and found the following :
apt-get install openoffice.org-core -V
Les NOUVEAUX paquets suivants seront installés :
openoffice.org-common (3.0.1-2)
openoffice.org-core (2.4.1-17+b1)
openoffice.org-s
reassign 516087 buildd.debian.org
thanks
Peter De Schrijver a écrit :
> Package: glibc
> Version: 2.9-1
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
>> Automatic build of glibc_2.9-1 on mayr by sbuild/mips 99.999
>> Build started at 20090218-1947
>
> [...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 516087 buildd.debian.org
Bug#516087: glibc_2.9-1(mips/unstable): FTBFS on mips. Regression test fails.
Bug reassigned from package `glibc' to `buildd.debian.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 502311 glibc_2.9-1(armel,i386,mipsel/unstable): regressions in
> testsuite
Bug#502311: glibc_2.8+20080809-2(ia64/experimental): regressions in testsuite
Changed Bug title to `glibc_2.9-1(armel,i386,mipsel/unstable): regressions in
testsu
Sven Joachim a écrit :
> On 2009-02-18 18:00 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
>> Then maybe some regressions have been added in the latest versions.
>> Could you retry with a 2.6.26 kernel from lenny/unstable? This version
>> is working on the buildd and on my machine, so that will infirm/confirm
>>
retitle 502311 glibc_2.9-1(armel,i386,mipsel/unstable): regressions in testsuite
thanks
Retitle the bug to let people know that the glibc team is also following
buildd.d.o and is *aware* of the problems and currently working on them.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
Your message dated Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:12:12 +0100
with message-id <20090219111212.ga23...@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#516084: when doing a dist-upgrade on sid, I get a
mixture of 2.4 and 3.0 openoffice.org. That doesn't work!
has caused the Debian Bug report #516084,
regarding wh
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 516090 serious
Bug#516090: openoffice.org: Openoffice fails to launch
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
> retitle 516090 dependencies allow mixture of 2.4.1 arch-dep with 3.0.1
> arch-indep which fails to start
Bug#516090: openoffi
Hi Daniel!
> From my pbuilder build log:
> ...
> # install an upstream changelog
> git-log >
> /tmp/buildd/blktrace-0.99.3+git-20080213182518/debian/blktrace/usr/share/doc/blktrace/changelog
> /bin/sh: git-log: not found
> make: *** [install-stamp] Error 127
> dpkg-buildpackage: failure: fakeroot
severity 516090 serious
retitle 516090 dependencies allow mixture of 2.4.1 arch-dep with 3.0.1
arch-indep which fails to start
reassign 516090 openoffice.org
reopen 516084
severity 516084 serious
forcemerge 516090 516084
found 516090thanks
Hi,
jblanc wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org-core
> Versi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
> found 516090 1:3.0.1-2
Bug#516090: dependencies allow mixture of 2.4.1 arch-dep with 3.0.1 arch-indep
which fails to start
Bug#516084: when doing a dist-upgrade on sid,
Hi,
Julien Blanc wrote:
> Looks also like there is a dependancy problem.
Maybe, yes.
> I'll try to remove and reinstall everything, and found the following :
>
> apt-get install openoffice.org-core -V
> Les NOUVEAUX paquets suivants seront installés :
>openoffice.org-common (3.0.1-2)
>o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
> notfound 516090 3.0
Bug#516090: dependencies allow mixture of 2.4.1 arch-dep with 3.0.1 arch-indep
which fails to start
Bug#516084: when doing a dist-upgrade on sid, I g
Package: qscintilla2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
Hi,
while working on a package that has a copy of qscintilla2 in its tarball
(for building on MacOSX), I noticed that qscintilla2 is a huge copyright-mess.
I thought I could steal your copyright-information for that, before doing
t
Your message dated Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:32:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#516056: fixed in zh-autoconvert 0.3.16-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #516056,
regarding zh-autoconvert: Gtk1.2 about to be removed from Debian
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Hi,
First, thanks for your answer,
> Hi,
>
> Julien Blanc wrote:
>> Looks also like there is a dependancy problem.
>
> Maybe, yes.
>
>> I'll try to remove and reinstall everything, and found the following :
>>
>> apt-get install openoffice.org-core -V
>> Les NOUVEAUX paquets suivants seront insta
Hi,
Julien Blanc wrote:
> In fact, i'm saying wrong version, because i would expect apt-get not to
> install anything in this case (not migrating to 3.0 since there is a
> dependancy breakage). This is what it does when installing, unfortunately not
There is no dependency breakage. The dependenci
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26etch2
> tags 494308 + pending
Bug#494308: binary firmware in drivers/net/e100.c
Tags were: lenny-ignore patch help
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26etch2
> tags 501152 + pending
Bug#501152: binary firmware in drivers/net/starfire_firmware.h
Tags were: lenny-ignore patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processin
Package: et131x-source
Version: 1.2.3-2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: code duplication
2.6.28 added et131x to staging thus linux-2.6 builds
that module in tree. there is no more need for another source
package.
so that package should be kept out of testing.
(2.6.28 is currently in NEW but wi
* Jaap Boender [Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:47:01 +0100]:
Hello, Jaap.
> The explanation: since ppmtofb conflicts with any python version strictly
> higher than 2.4, any package that depends on python-2.4 will not be
> installable together with ppmtofb, hence the 1591 packages (a full list, with
> for
I've posted this bug in the gnome bugzilla.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572203
I should note that iceweasel saves downloaded files in the Desktop by
default (without much notice), evolution seems to remember the last path
you used (which might be Desktop).
In summary, there are ma
I'd also argue that keeping track of all the points that can create
a .desktop with the x bit set is certainly a much more secure way of
handling this, for instance, the DnD code could check:
Should the permissions be preserved on DnD?
Is the origin file:
* not a .desktop file? force umask
Package: atokx
Version: 1.0-22
Severity: serious
Hi,
Gtk1.2 will not be shipping with Squeeze so atokx will either
need to be ported to Gtk2 or removed from the archive.
Since atokx has never been part of a stable release and atokx2 exists,
it should likely just be removed.
Thanks,
Barry de
Package: gtk-engines-lighthouseblue
Version: 0.6.3-1.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Gtk1.2 will not be shipping with Squeeze so gtk-engines-lighthouseblue
will either need to be ported to Gtk2 or removed from the archive.
It appears that upstream version 0.7.0 is Gtk2 but development seems
inactive
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 10:51 -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Gtk1.2 will not be shipping with Squeeze so gtk-engines-lighthouseblue
> will either need to be ported to Gtk2 or removed from the archive.
>
> It appears that upstream version 0.7.0 is Gtk2 but development seems
> inactive since 2003.
Package: guile-gtk-1.2
Version: 0.31-5.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Gtk1.2 will not be shipping with Squeeze so guile-gtk-1.2 will either
need to be ported to Gtk2 or removed from the archive.
Upstream does seem to have a Gtk2 release at
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/guile-gtk. I assume the most appropriate t
tag 515976 help
kthxbye
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 16:54 +0100, Heiko Munz wrote:
> Package: libxi6
> Version: 2:1.2.0-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> After upgrading libxi6 from the version 1.1.4-1 to 1.2.0-2, the login
> manager (in my case kdm) use the wrong keyboa
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 515976 help
Bug#515976: libxi6 causes kdm using the wrong keyboard-layout
There were no tags set.
Bug#515734: xinit: changes keyboard layout at gdm login screen suddenly
Bug#515905: gdm starts with the wrong keymap
Tags added: help
> kthxbye
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:38:13AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Sven Joachim a écrit :
> > On 2009-02-18 18:00 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> >> Then maybe some regressions have been added in the latest versions.
> >> Could you retry with a 2.6.26 kernel from lenny/unstable? This version
> >
Package: gwave
Version: 20060606-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Gtk1.2 will not be shipping with Squeeze so gwave will either
need to be ported to Gtk2 or removed from the archive.
It appears that there is a gwave2 on Sourceforge that utilizes Gtk2.
http://gwave.sourceforge.net
Thanks,
Barry deFre
Package: libdv
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Gtk1.2 will not be shipping with Squeeze so libdv will either
need to be ported to Gtk2 or removed from the archive.
It seems that playdv is the only package using Gtk and can be built
without Gtk. Removing the build-depends on libglib1.2
Package: linpopup
Version: 1.2.0-8.3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Gtk1.2 will not be shipping with Squeeze so linpopup will either
need to be ported to Gtk2 or removed from the archive.
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
Debian QA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
Package: tex-guy
Version: 1.3.2-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
Gtk1.2 will not be shipping with Squeeze so tex-guy will either
need to be ported to Gtk2 or removed from the archive.
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
Debian QA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
Package: axiom
Version: 20081101-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.3
mail sent to the maintainer address for this package bounces with the following
message:
Dr. Camm Maguire is no longer employed by INTECH. Please email him at
c...@maguirefamily.org instead.
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Those two failures are due to the behavior of dash versus bash. The test
> tries to test that system() is cancellable. system() invokes /bin/sh
> (and this is hard-coded, not changeable via any environment variable).
> When doing /bin/bash -c "/bin/echo foo", bash is cleve
maximilian attems wrote:
> Package: et131x-source
> Version: 1.2.3-2-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: code duplication
>
> 2.6.28 added et131x to staging thus linux-2.6 builds
> that module in tree. there is no more need for another source
> package.
>
> so that package should be kept out o
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> reassign 516087 buildd.debian.org
> thanks
>
> Peter De Schrijver a écrit :
>> Package: glibc
>> Version: 2.9-1
>> Severity: serious
>>
>> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>>
>>> Automatic build of glibc_2.9-1 on mayr by sbuild/mips 99.999
>>> Buil
On Thursday 19 February 2009 03:31:53 Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Daniel!
>
> > From my pbuilder build log:
> > ...
> > # install an upstream changelog
> > git-log >
> > /tmp/buildd/blktrace-0.99.3+git-20080213182518/debian/blktrace/usr/share/
> >doc/blktrace/changelog /bin/sh: git-log: not found
> >
Hi Daniel!
You wrote:
> The git-core package in my pbuilder apt cache (version 1:1.6.1.3-1) only has
> git-log in /usr/lib/git-core. Maybe you're forgetting to add that directory
> to PATH?
Ahh, that seems to be a recent change in git-core. I'll fix it, thanks!
--
Kind regards,
Bas Zoeteko
Package: bogofilter
Version: 1.1.7-2
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log (on amd64):
...
PASS: t.bogoutil
PASS: t.lock1
FAIL: t.lock3
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 07:15:53PM +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Those two failures are due to the behavior of dash versus bash. The test
> > tries to test that system() is cancellable. system() invokes /bin/sh
> > (and this is hard-coded, not changeable via any environ
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 07:29:43PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > reassign 516087 buildd.debian.org
> > thanks
> >
> > Peter De Schrijver a écrit :
> >> Package: glibc
> >> Version: 2.9-1
> >> Severity: serious
> >>
> >> There was an error while trying to autobuild your packag
Package: xbindkeys-config
Version: 0.1.3-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Gtk1.2 will not be shipping with Squeeze so xbindkeys-config will either
need to be ported to Gtk2 or removed from the archive.
I am attaching a debdiff that builds with Gtk2 as well as several other
fixes. Seems to work fine wi
Hi,
I got hit by this bug. Running Sid, no display manager (Xfce started
via startx). From xorg.conf:
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Generic Keyboard"
Driver "kbd"
Option "XkbRules" "xorg"
Option "XkbModel" "pc104"
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 07:25:39PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > Package: et131x-source
> > Version: 1.2.3-2-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: code duplication
> >
> > 2.6.28 added et131x to staging thus linux-2.6 builds
> > that module in tree. there is no more n
Package: ocaml
Version: 3.11.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Heya,
Building your package failed on my buildd:
| Automatic build of ocaml_3.11.0-3 on anakreon.ayous.org by sbuild/powerpc
98-farm
| Build started at 20090219-1827
I just found this mail thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2009/02/msg00042.html
Stefan writes there that:
> Since the update the keyboard in X11 has gone weird. Every second key
> press under X11 is recognized as if the Ctrl key was pressed, i.e.
> every second 'm' is a newline, every s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
En/na Luk Claes ha escrit:
> maximilian attems wrote:
>> Package: et131x-source
>> Version: 1.2.3-2-1
>> Severity: serious
>> Justification: code duplication
>>
>> 2.6.28 added et131x to staging thus linux-2.6 builds
>> that module in tree. there is no
OK, I downgraded xkb-data to version 1.3-2 (was not able to find a
copy of 1.4-1) and xorg I can't reproduce the error anymore.
Sounds like solid evidence that xkb-data 1.5-2 has a serious issue.
Cheers,
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Package: kphotoalbum
Version: 3.1.1-2+b2
Severity: serious
Justification: 3
Hi,
kphotoalbum crashed. I can not imagine why. The crashreport will follow.
Greetings
Torsten
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (90, 'unstable')
Architecture
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 516217 normal
Bug#516217: kphotoalbum: crashes without seeing reason
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Hi,
thanks for reporting this bug.
It is fixed in 5.6.1.
Please use newest version from http://www.credativ.com/~phu/kanyremote/
until my sponsor has uploaded it and it's being installed in the archive.
Regards,
--
.''`. Philipp Hübner
: :' : http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debala
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 516169 + pending
Bug#516169: kanyremote: Error while configuration saving
Tags were: confirmed
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Daniel J. Calandria Hernández wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It works with nautilus 2.24 from experimental
Thank you for checking.
In the end the problem was that shared-mime-info changed the mime.cache file
structure in an incompatible manner, but some packages (nautilus, tracker,
libgnomevfs) have their own
maximilian attems wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 07:25:39PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>> maximilian attems wrote:
>>> Package: et131x-source
>>> Version: 1.2.3-2-1
>>> Severity: serious
>>> Justification: code duplication
>>>
>>> 2.6.28 added et131x to staging thus linux-2.6 builds
>>> that module
Your message dated Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:11:10 GMT
with message-id <200902192211.n1jmbaxc020...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line manedit has been removed from Debian, closing #515349
has caused the Debian Bug report #515349,
regarding Depends on GTK 1.2 and GLIB 1.2
to be marked as done.
This mean
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:54:00AM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Package: guile-gtk-1.2
> Version: 0.31-5.1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Gtk1.2 will not be shipping with Squeeze so guile-gtk-1.2 will either
> need to be ported to Gtk2 or removed from the archive.
>
> Upstream does seem to have
Package: gpsim
Version: 0.22.0-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
Gtk1.2 will not be shipping with Squeeze so gpsim will either
need to be ported to Gtk2 or removed from the archive.
Actually it appears that gpsim already uses Gtk2 as one of the
build-dependencies is libgtkexta-x11-2.0-dev. Removing the
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:54:00AM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
>> Gtk1.2 will not be shipping with Squeeze so guile-gtk-1.2 will either
>> need to be ported to Gtk2 or removed from the archive.
>>
>> Upstream does seem to have a Gtk2 release at
>> ftp://ftp.gnu.org/guile
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
> # via tagpending
> #
> # ocaml (3.11.0-4) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Add a script to handle native modules of standard library, and a
> #README.source to docu
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
# via tagpending
#
# ocaml (3.11.0-4) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Add a script to handle native modules of standard library, and a
#README.source to document it (fixes FTBFS on sparc and powerpc, which
#are nativ
Your message dated Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:02:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#456139: fixed in ygraph 0.16~cvs20090218-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #456139,
regarding ygraph -- Please transition to imlib2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
> # via tagpending
> #
> # ocaml (3.11.0-4) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Add a script to handle native modules of standard library, and a
> #README.source to docu
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
# via tagpending
#
# ocaml (3.11.0-4) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Add a script to handle native modules of standard library, and a
#README.source to document it (fixes FTBFS on sparc and powerpc, which
#are nativ
Package: haddock
Version: 2.4.1-3
Severity: grave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Kaol,
I was about to start packaging libraries for ghc6.10 (haskell-X11 to be
precise), using the just built haddock from incoming, when I this
this problem:
$ /usr/bin/haddock
--read-interface=/
Package: liborbit2
Version: 1:2.14.16-0.1
Followup-For: Bug #514110
I'm not sure what upstream is talking about - this package is broken (well,
has some issues is more accurate). Note that my system was fine until the
upgrade after Lenny went stable (Feb 16th upgrade borked things). I got
about 30
[CC’ing d-haskell, this might be a larger annoyance]
Hi again,
Am Freitag, den 20.02.2009, 01:18 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> I was about to start packaging libraries for ghc6.10 (haskell-X11 to be
> precise), using the just built haddock from incoming, when I this
> this problem:
>
> For th
Package: skyeye
Version: 1.2.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Usertags: implicit-pointer-conversion
Our automated buildd log filter[1] detected a problem that is likely to
cause your package to segfault on architectures where the size of a
pointer is greater than the size of an integer, such as i
This seems to have fixed my boot problem:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-alpha/2009/02/msg00026.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote
> So yes, I'm very confident that haddock's interface files are not arch
> independent. Which is quite bad, I guess.
>
> I see two solutions:
> * We patch haddock to not store any arch dependent data.
> (Probably quite some work)
> * We
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 515946 2:1.2.0-2
Bug#515946: libxi6 2:1.2.0-2 makes iceweasel (when selecting text) and midori
crash
Bug no longer marked as found in version 2:1.2.0-2.
> found 515946 2:1.2.0-2
Bug#515946: libxi6 2:1.2.0-2 makes iceweasel (when selecti
Your message dated Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:17:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#516248: fixed in skyeye 1.2.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #516248,
regarding skyeye: get_sym implicitly converted to pointer
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Julien Cristau wrote:
> tag 515976 help
> kthxbye
>
> On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 16:54 +0100, Heiko Munz wrote:
>> Package: libxi6
>> Version: 2:1.2.0-2
>> Severity: grave
>> Justification: renders package unusable
>>
>> After upgrading libxi6 from the version 1.1.4-1 to 1.2.0-2, the login
>> manager (
Package: consolekit
Version: 0.2.10-5
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
Making all in doc
make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/consolekit-0.2.10/doc'
/usr/bin/xmlto xhtml-nochunks -m config.xsl Con
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:47:34 -0500
David Nusinow wrote:
...
> I think I've figured out this bug. It looks like the new libxi was built
> against the new input protocol headers, while the server was built
> against the old headers. The mismatch in the protocol could very well be
> causing this bu
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:47:34 -0500
David Nusinow wrote:
...
> I think I've figured out this bug. It looks like the new libxi was built
> against the new input protocol headers, while the server was built
> against the old headers. The mismatch in the protocol could very wel
Celejar wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:47:34 -0500
> David Nusinow wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> I think I've figured out this bug. It looks like the new libxi was built
>> against the new input protocol headers, while the server was built
>> against the old headers. The mismatch in the protocol could ve
Hi Emilio,
I have two X86_64 machines with Debian unstable installed.
Both of them are using 0.51-3 without any problem.
ii shared-mime-info 0.51-3
ii nautilus 2.20.0-7
ii libgnomevfs2-0 1:2.22.0-5
0.51-2 also works fine si
Your message dated Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:32:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#515976: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.4.2-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #515976,
regarding gdm starts with the wrong keymap
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:32:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#515976: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.4.2-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #515976,
regarding xinit: changes keyboard layout at gdm login screen suddenly
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:32:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#515976: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.4.2-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #515976,
regarding libxi6 causes kdm using the wrong keyboard-layout
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> retitle 515946 libxi6 2:1.2.0-2 makes iceweasel (when selecting text) and
> midori crash
> thanks
>
> On 2009-02-18 16:18:29 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
>> The bug comes from libxi6 2:1.2.0-2 (downgrading to 2:1.1.4-1
>> solves the problem).
>>
>
> To summarize
Your message dated Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:32:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#514141: fixed in spectools 200902R1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #514141,
regarding spectools_200902R1-1(mips/unstable):
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Hi all,
The WRI put the fonts again in their web site so I just
uploaded a new package which should download the Mathematica
fonts.
But I also uploaded a STIX fonts package to experimental
and I'm not sure if ttf-mathematica4.1 is necessary for
Debian from now on.
I'd like to hear any advise
Package: libpng
Version: 1.2.33-2
Severity: serious
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
The following SA (Secunia Advisory) id was published for libpng:
SA33970[1]
> DESCRIPTION:
> A vulnerability has been reported in libpng, which can be exploited
> by malicious p
Your message dated Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:47:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#511644: fixed in ttf-mathematica4.1 7
has caused the Debian Bug report #511644,
regarding ttf-mathematica4.1: Mathematica fonts have changed url
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 08:20 +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Hi Drew,
>
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:19:37 +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> > It's importance for me is that we have access to Mathematica installed on
> > the central university computer. When I run it from a terminal on my
> > computer, M
95 matches
Mail list logo
