Bug#494514: insserv: Test suite fail on alpha

Package: insserv Version: 1.12.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: help User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertag: incorrect-boot-order The build of the latest insserv version fail on alpha, because the testsuite fail. The last test fail, the one named "test that a symlink in /etc/init.d/ to another script does

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

Package: scheme2c Version: 1993.3.15.2-1 Severity: serious fails to build on all buildd's: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=scheme2c On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 04:39:51AM +, Debian/armel Build Daemon wrote: > # Add here commands to clean up after the build pr

Bug#494515: Crash: "object allocation during garbage collection phase"

Package: ruby1.8 Version: 1.8.7.22-2 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss I've written a ruby program using Gtk that crashes the Ruby VM every time I run it. If the ruby VM crashes when you have unsaved data you will lose data ==> this is a dataloss bug (even if I didn'

Bug#237319: using unclutter does has some side-effects

severity 227800 important severity 237319 important severity 413282 important severity 493144 important thanks using unclutter does have some side-effects. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.pant

Bug#493714: openttd: Network exploitable buffer overrun

R. Bijker wrote: > Therefore the best way to fix this is by upgrading to 0.6.2, also in lenny. I agree, can you upload 0.6.2 to unstable? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#494504: CVE-2008-1232/CVE-2008-2370: XSS and directory traversal

Package: tomcat5.5 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Hi, the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) ids were published for tomcat5.5. CVE-2008-1232[0]: | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 4.1.0 | through 4.1.37, 5.5.0 through 5.5.

Bug#480811: marked as done (Don't build depend on libxul-dev)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 13:32:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#480811: fixed in mono-tools 1.9-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #480811, regarding Don't build depend on libxul-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#494513: Uninstallable: unable to make backup link

Package: tzdata Version: 2008e-1 Severity: serious Hi, Bug marked as serious as it makes the package uninstallable. The bug is the following: Preparing to replace tzdata 2008e-1 (using .../tzdata_2008e-2_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement tzdata ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives

Bug#487204: marked as done (ruby1.8: object allocation during garbage collection phase)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:46:12 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in libcairo-ruby 1.6.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #487204, regarding ruby1.8: object allocation during garbage collection phase to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#494295: marked as done (nini: includes binary-only copies of sample apps (DFSG §2 violation))

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:32:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#494295: fixed in nini 1.1.0+dfsg.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #494295, regarding nini: includes binary-only copies of sample apps (DFSG §2 violation) to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#480797: marked as done (Don't build depend on libxul-dev)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 09:47:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#480797: fixed in monodevelop 1.0+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #480797, regarding Don't build depend on libxul-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#494166: madwifi-source: HAL ABI mismatch with 0.9.4+r3772.20080716-1

severity 494166 important thanks On Sunday 10 August 2008 22:11:37 Kel Modderman wrote: > On Friday 08 August 2008 01:08:29 Luc Begault wrote: > > Package: madwifi-source > > Version: 1:0.9.4+r3772.20080716-1 > > Severity: grave > > Justification: renders package unusable > > > > After an upgrade

Bug#493848: marked as done

2008/8/10 Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 09/08/2008 Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >> Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2008 12:47:03 + >> From: Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Bug#493848: fixed in cryptsetup 2:1.0.6-6 >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Source: cryptsetup >> Source-Version:

Bug#488817: marked as done (clisp: FTBFS on s390: configure: error: C preprocessor "gcc -E" fails sanity check)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 10:17:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#488817: fixed in clisp 1:2.44.1-4.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #488817, regarding clisp: FTBFS on s390: configure: error: C preprocessor "gcc -E" fails sanity check to be marked as do

Bug#493848: marked as done

On 09/08/2008 Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2008 12:47:03 + > From: Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Bug#493848: fixed in cryptsetup 2:1.0.6-6 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Source: cryptsetup > Source-Version: 2:1.0.6-6 > > We believe that the bug you reported

Bug#493454: marked as done (avr-libc: FTBFS: Failure running pdflatex)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 12:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#493454: fixed in avr-libc 1:1.6.2.cvs20080610-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #493454, regarding avr-libc: FTBFS: Failure running pdflatex to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#493454: Easy fix

Thanx, I'll upload an update. On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 11:18 PM, Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > tags 493454 patch > thanks > > This is caused by a missing dependency on texlive-extra-utils, > avr-libc uses epstopdf from this package during build. I'm not > providing a trivial patch, confi

Bug#494119: permission to copy, distribute, modify?!?

It says it's derived from AF05BDA.sys. Are you sure you, Debian or anyone has permission to copy and distribute it? And to modify it? That someone distributed it, perhaps even under the GPL, doesn't grant you permission to redistribute it, if the person who did so wans't the copyright holder. Th

Bug#494408: tagging 494408

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 # help appreciated tags 494408 help -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#487037: marked as done (mono-tools: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libnunit2.2.6-cil)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 13:32:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#487037: fixed in mono-tools 1.9-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #487037, regarding mono-tools: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libnunit2.2.6-cil to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#494544: debroster: arch-indep data in /usr/lib

Package: debroster Severity: serious Justification: FHS Hi, debroster places a jpg and a shell script into /usr/lib instead of /usr/share. please move /usr/lib/debroster completely to /usr/share/debroster. Thanks, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist E

Bug#494168: must be missing dependencies

Hi, I just observed the very same problem and found this bugreport. After manually upgrading all cups-related libraries (not all of them had been upgraded with the 1.3.8-1 upgrade of cups itself) the problem was gone. hth greets mlo -- Dipl.-Ing. Martin Lorenz They that can give u

Bug#491182: Checking bug status

Hi, What's the status of this? Thomas, can you please expand about the potential for breaking other things? As it stands right now, I see this patch committed to OpenBSD CVS and no followup/reversion for a month now, so presumably it looks good. I'm willing to NMU this, unless there are other

Bug#493278: Original bug in gdc fixed; binary rebuilds probably need to be requested for broken powerpc packages

The original bug which caused all of these blocking bugs has been fixed; rebuilds probably need to be requested for all of these packages. Don Armstrong -- This can't be happening to me. I've got tenure. -- James Hynes _Publish and Perish_ http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > tag 494236 + pending Bug#494236: matplotlib: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `doc/build/latex/Matplotlib.pdf': No such file or directory There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistan

Processed: found 473167 in gdc-4.1/4.1.2-22

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 > found 473167 gdc-4.1/4.1.2-22 Bug#473167: string concatenation segfaults Bug marked as found in version gdc-4.1/4.1.2-22 and reopened. > End of message, stopping processing her

Processed: Re: Bug#494166: madwifi-source: HAL ABI mismatch with 0.9.4+r3772.20080716-1

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > severity 494166 important Bug#494166: madwifi-source: HAL ABI mismatch with 0.9.4+r3772.20080716-1 Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system a

Bug#494513: marked as done (Uninstallable: unable to make backup link)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:36:23 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Filesystem problem in my side has caused the Debian Bug report #494513, regarding Uninstallable: unable to make backup link to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed (with 2 errors): dealing with some more of the old bugs lucas unarchived

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > #FTBFS on i386 bug, current lenny/sid version built fine on the i386 buildd > close 426415 2.4.6-1 Bug#426415: gimp: Build stalls 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 2.4.6-1, send

Bug#491984: Potential fixes

Hi, Looks like ProFont does not contain any copyright/licensing information whatsoever, that's not very good, I imagine. The second set of fonts has an explicit modification prohibition. Not sure what would be the best solution here, the options I see are: 1. Replace the non-free fonts with fr

Processed: Tagging gnat-4.3 bugs as pending

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > tags 248172 pending Bug#248172: [Fixed in 4.4] gnat: Legal program rejected, procedure of Tags were: fixed-upstream upstream Tags added: pending > tags 487564 pending Bug#487564: gnat-4.3: FTBFS with gnat-4.3 but not gnat installed There were no t

Processed: tagging 493810, severity of 493810 is normal

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 > tags 493810 unreproducible moreinfo Bug#493810: zapping crashes X.org server There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo > severity 493810 normal Bug#493810: z

Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 > # introduces regressions in other packages > severity 494473 serious > Robert, If you'd like to perform an NMU of the unifont-5.1.20080808-2 package t

Processed: using unclutter does has some side-effects

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > severity 227800 important Bug#227800: libsdl1.2debian: penguin-command: randomly, mouse goes to screen centre Bug#237319: unclutter: Causes periodic displacement of mouse pointer Bug#413282: libsdl1.2debian: Mouse pointer periodically snaps to wro

Bug#451303: suggestions?

[ Aren Olson ] > Packaging them raises a few problems, namely > > 1) our current architecture isn't designed to support this > 2) we can't distribute updates to plugins quickly if, for example, the > API for a particular web service is changed > > in discussion of this bug in launchpad, we came u

Processed: found 473167 in gdc-4.1/4.1.2-22

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 > found 473167 gdc-4.1/4.1.2-22 Bug#473167: string concatenation segfaults Bug marked as found in version gdc-4.1/4.1.2-22. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please co

Processed: tagging 494408

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 > # help appreciated > tags 494408 help Bug#494408: linux-patch-exec-shield: Outdated kernel patch There were no tags set. Tags added: help > End of message, stopping processing

Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious

I just saw from reading about Bug #494460 that it was unifont-bin that installed unifont.hex. With the package I put together last night for testing, /usr/share/unifont/unifont.hex is put in place by the "unifont" package, not the "unifont-bin" package. Will that still be okay for GRUB? Paul Ha

Bug#494558: monotone-viz: incompatible with monotone 0.40; new upstream version available; please update

Package: monotone-viz Version: 0.15-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I'm sorry to report that monotone-viz does not work with monotone 0.40 databases. This is probably due to the new storage mechanism used for hashes (binary instead of hex-encoded; see monotone's NEWS file

Bug#494561: [linux-kbuild-2.6.26] Scripts missing, module compilation fails

Package: linux-kbuild-2.6.26 Version: 2.6.26-2 Severity: serious --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Trying to build the nvidia module it complains about missing scripts, it seems version 2.6.26-2 doesn't package the scripts in subdirectories. After building these scripts from the

Bug#494493: Autodetection is broken

Peter 'p2' De Schrijver a écrit : The module probably works if you force the model as mentioned in #473671, but autodetection is broken. The patch fixes this. Tested on Medion MD97600. Cheers, Peter. Hello Peter, I just had a look at your patch but I think it's wrong. Looks at the orig

Bug#494493: Autodetection is broken

Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) a écrit : Peter 'p2' De Schrijver a écrit : The module probably works if you force the model as mentioned in #473671, but autodetection is broken. The patch fixes this. Tested on Medion MD97600. Cheers, Peter. Hello Peter, I just had a look at your patch but I th

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I don't understand. That was generated by building on an alpha, which is not a supported architecture. $ egrep '(Source|Package|Arch)' debian/control Source: scheme2c Package: scheme2c Architecture: i386 amd64 Package: scheme2c-doc Archit

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > fails to build on all buildd's: > > http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=scheme2c Just Looked at the i386 log. It appears that the autobuilder is attempting to build the binary-indep package without first satisfying

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 05:30:33PM +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > I don't understand. That was generated by building on an alpha, which > is not a supported architecture. > $ egrep '(Source|Package|Arch)' debian/control > Source: scheme2c > Package: scheme2c > Architecture: i386 amd

Bug#494561: marked as done ([linux-kbuild-2.6.26] Scripts missing, module compilation fails)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:58:49 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#494561: [linux-kbuild-2.6.26] Scripts missing, module compilation fails has caused the Debian Bug report #494561, regarding [linux-kbuild-2.6.26] Scripts missing, module compilation fai

Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 08:56:07AM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 > > # introduces regressions in other packages > > severity 494473 serious > > > > Robert

Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 09:04:34AM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: > I just saw from reading about Bug #494460 that it was unifont-bin that > installed unifont.hex. With the package I put together last night for > testing, /usr/share/unifont/unifont.hex is put in place by the > "unifont" package, not the

Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 07:05:46PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 08:56:07AM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 > > > # introduces re

Bug#494246: Problem caused by dot in option name

Hi, This failure is caused by the presence of the dots in one of the options (--pack-0.92) in doc/en/user-reference/bzr_man.txt. Removing the dots manually resulted in successful package build. Unfortunately, this file itself is machine-generated using the command python generate_docs.py -o do

Bug#494515: Crash: "object allocation during garbage collection phase"

Hi Johan, On 10/08/08 at 11:35 +0200, Johan Walles wrote: > Package: ruby1.8 > Version: 1.8.7.22-2 > Severity: grave > Justification: causes non-serious data loss > > > I've written a ruby program using Gtk that crashes the Ruby VM every time I > run it. > > If the ruby VM crashes when you hav

Bug#494447: aufs-source - FTBFS: Fails to build against s390x (64-bit s390) kernel

Am Samstag, den 09.08.2008, 16:05 +0200 schrieb Bastian Blank: > Package: aufs-source > Version: 0+20080719-2 > Severity: serious > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > > > Automatic build of linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.26-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by > > sbuild/s390 98 >

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 17:36:44 +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > > fails to build on all buildd's: > > > > http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=scheme2c > > Just Looked at the i386 log. It appears that the autobuilder is > attempting to build the binary-indep

Bug#493781: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?

Hello all, I need some help regarding #493781: the submitter reported the bug as grave because he thinks that modifying slapd.conf to include an extra LDAP schema from the maintainer scripts of a package (phamm-ldap in this case) is against the Debian policy. Considering that slapd.conf is not (a

Bug#494473: marked as done (unifont.hex gone away but needed by GRUB)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:32:09 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#494473: fixed in unifont 1:5.1.20080808-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #494473, regarding unifont.hex gone away but needed by GRUB to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#493781: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?

su, 2008-08-10 kello 19:34 +0200, Fabio Tranchitella kirjoitti: > Considering that slapd.conf is not (anymore) a conffile, in my opinion this > behaviour is not forbidden from the Debian policy and thus the bug report > could be closed without any change to the phamm-ldap package. > > Of course, h

Processed: Marking 393970 as fixed in the latest version

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > fixed 393970 chiark-tcl/1.1.0 Bug#393970: chiark-tcl - FTBFS: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'size_t' Bug marked as fixed in version chiark-tcl/1.1.0. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Processed: tagging 494416, severity of 494416 is important

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 > tags 494416 moreinfo Bug#494416: xserver-xorg-video-intel: no other resolution than 640x480 with latest version at X startup There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > sev

Bug#488696: Fixing 488696

Hi, Are there any plans to fix bug 488696? The comedi-source package is now affected by a freeze, so the chances to get a fix in are quickly diminishing with time. Please let me know if you would like me or someone else to prepare an NMU, if you don't have the time to do it. Thanks. -- Jurij

Processed: Re: try again...

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > # yay bts breakage > merge 494349 494555 494556 Bug#494349: libqt3-mt: throws errors and sometimes crashes X Bug#494555: libqt3-mt: throws errors and sometimes crashes X Bug#494556: libqt3-mt: throws errors and sometimes crashes X Merged 494349 494

Bug#494447: aufs-source - FTBFS: Fails to build against s390x (64-bit s390) kernel

severity 494447 important thanks On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 07:22:22PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > The error is a buildtime check for the size of ino_t. This is 32 bit on > > all s390 types but the code expects it to be equal to the word size. > Should I simply remove the check? I can't tes

Processed: Re: Bug#494447: aufs-source - FTBFS: Fails to build against s390x (64-bit s390) kernel

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > severity 494447 important Bug#494447: aufs-source - FTBFS: Fails to build against s390x (64-bit s390) kernel Severity set to `important' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug trac

Bug#494572: /etc/init.d/ski: bashism (use of "function") in /bin/sh script

Package: ski Version: 1.3.2-2.1 Severity: serious File: /etc/init.d/ski Justification: Policy 10.4 Despite specifying /bin/sh as its interpreter, /etc/init.d/ski makes use of the bashism "function" when defining verify_binfmt_mnt. Could you please fix it to use portable function-definition syntax

Bug#494515: Script, full crash info

Here's the script leading to the above crash, as well as the full output from bug-buddy. Nope, no Cairo (at least not directly). Some other Gnome related things though (see script source code). Cheers //Johan System: Linux 2.6.25-2-686 #1 SMP Fri Jul 18 17:46:56 UTC 2008 i686 X Vendor: The X.O

Bug#485909: marked as done (fuse-source fails to build with linux-source-2.6.25)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#485909: fixed in fuse 2.7.3-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #485909, regarding fuse-source fails to build with linux-source-2.6.25 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#494493: marked as done (Broken for any real world use)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#494493: fixed in acerhk 0.5.35-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #494493, regarding Broken for any real world use to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious

Robert: On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Sure, I'll sponsor it right away. > > Done. I noticed a Replaces is missing on the unifont-bin versions that used > to include unifont.hex (this is always needed when moving files between > packages). Since we

Processed: bugzilla upgrade deletes /etc/bugzilla3/params then fails when it isn't there

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > severity 493286 normal Bug#493286: bugzilla upgrade deletes /etc/bugzilla3/params then fails when it isn't there Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#488082: Unable to reproduce

tags 488082 unreproducible thanks Hi, I've tried reproducing this bug and the package installed just fine for me (and for some other people who I asked to check). Can you please verify that you do not have the /tmp partition mounted with noexec option (post the output of 'mount' command if in

Processed: Unable to reproduce

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > tags 488082 unreproducible Bug#488082: cxref: Install preconfiguration fails There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 09:04:34AM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: >> I just saw from reading about Bug #494460 that it was unifont-bin that >> installed unifont.hex. With the package I put together last night for >> testing, /us

Bug#493781: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 08:53:32PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote: > But the whole procedure is valid since it is only a recommendation by > the policy, so this is IMHO not a release critical bug. If the consensus on this will be that this bug is RC then there is also a bug in the policy and the wording

Bug#493781: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?

RFC 2119 says: | 3. SHOULD This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there |may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore |a particular item, but the full implications must be understood and |carefully weighed before choosing a different course. Debian Pol

Processed: Re: Bug#480154: FTBFS on mips (cgiupload tests fail)

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > tag 480154 patch Bug#480154: non-determistic FTBFS: cgiupload tests fail There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrat

Bug#480154: FTBFS on mips (cgiupload tests fail)

tag 480154 patch thanks On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 05:15:32PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 03:22:55PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > > On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 02:09:10PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > > > Package: libapache2-mod-perl2 > > > Version: 2.0.4-1 > > > Severity: serious >

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

> buildds use debian/rules build, and your debian/rules has build > depend on build-indep. So you either need to move the > build-depends-indep to regular build-deps, or make sure that > debian/rules build doesn't need them. Wait a second! (a) My debian/rules is a standard debhelper default in t

Bug#493714: openttd: Network exploitable buffer overrun

Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: I agree, can you upload 0.6.2 to unstable? Cheers, Moritz I have absolutely no influence over getting OpenTTD 0.6.2 physically uploaded to Debian-unstable. Regards, Remko Bijker -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscri

Bug#494585: /usr/bin/plasma: Drag and drop of email attachment to folder icon copies 0 length file

Package: libplasma2 Version: 4:4.0.98-1 Severity: serious File: /usr/bin/plasma Justification: 4 Drag included file from a kmail email to a desktop icon for a folder (icon as opposed to a folder-view plasmoid). Choose copy (probably does not matter). A zero length file of the target name is create

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 20:11:24 +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > (a) My debian/rules is a standard debhelper default in this regard. > > (b) Debian policy section 7.7 says: > > The `Build-Depends-Indep' and `Build-Conflicts-Indep' fields > must be satisfied when any of the follo

Bug#493781: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?

* 2008-08-10 21:09, Carsten Hey wrote: > | 11.7.4 Sharing configuration files > | > | ... > | > | The maintainer scripts must not alter a conffile of any package, > | including the one the scripts belong to. > > It is not a conffile, so this is not a problem. This is the exact sentence which keep

Bug#493714: openttd: Network exploitable buffer overrun

Hi Moritz, * Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-10 20:42]: > R. Bijker wrote: > > Therefore the best way to fix this is by upgrading to 0.6.2, also in lenny. > > I agree, can you upload 0.6.2 to unstable? I got a private mail by the maintainer stating: "New version should be uploaded

Bug#493781: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?

On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: > I need some help regarding #493781: the submitter reported the bug as grave > because he thinks that modifying slapd.conf to include an extra LDAP schema > from the maintainer scripts of a package (phamm-ldap in this case) is > against the Debian po

Processed: Re: Bug#494025: FTBFS: ../../../../src/util/time.h:44: error: expected ')' before 'n'

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > # reduce priority because it is a build with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS and since > # this bug (on 0.11.1-1.2etch1) would block 0.11.4-2 from entering testing. > severity 494025 important Bug#494025: FTBFS: ../../../../src/util/time.h:44: error: expected ')

Processed: Re: Bug#494112: File::Copy::move truncates open file when rename fails (was: sshfs silently truncates files...)

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > clone 494112 -1 Bug#494112: File::Copy::move truncates open file when rename fails Bug 494112 cloned as bug 494590. > reassign 494112 autoconf 2.61-7 Bug#494112: File::Copy::move truncates open file when rename fails Bug reassigned from package `p

Bug#494112: File::Copy::move truncates open file when rename fails (was: sshfs silently truncates files...)

clone 494112 -1 reassign 494112 autoconf 2.61-7 retitle 494112 autoconf: should close its output before calling File::Copy::move() on it tag 494112 patch fixed-upstream retitle -1 perl: document that File::Copy::move() doesn't flush open files severity -1 wishlist thanks On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 1

Bug#494025: FTBFS: ../../../../src/util/time.h:44: error: expected ')' before 'n'

# reduce priority because it is a build with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS and since # this bug (on 0.11.1-1.2etch1) would block 0.11.4-2 from entering testing. severity 494025 important tags 494025 + moreinfo thanks On 08/08/06 21:46 +0300, Timo Juhani Lindfors said ... > from ../../../../sr

Processed: sorry typo

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > #typo in my previous request > notfixed 426306 2.2.10-3 Bug#426306: Suspend function in laptop broken Bug no longer marked as fixed in version 2.2.10-3. > #request to change a build dependency, current lenny/sid version has the > #change > close 4

Bug#483989: xserver-xorg-video-savage: system freeze while starting X

You listed 5 reverted commits above. Did you try to narrow down which ones you need to revert? Or are they all broken by the 02_temporary_revert_pciaccess.diff? You can also try to start the server with "sudo strace Xorg" from another machine, or "sudo gdb Xorg". Sometimes the debugging makes the

Bug#493781: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?

* 2008-08-10 22:25, Peter Palfrader wrote: > The submitter is right. > > | Packages must not modify other packages' configuration files > | except by an agreed upon APIs (eg, a /usr/sbin/update-foo > | command). > > http://release.debian.org/lenny/rc_policy.txt section 3. Thanks, we'll prepare a

Bug#493711: Debian unifont Bug #493711

Yes, in the thread http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/130808 talks about the problem. OK, thanks. > Paul Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thank you both for your diagnostic information on this bug record. > Thank you also for your interest in this package, which I'

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

This is ridiculous. If the buildds do "debian/rules binary" they should first install both build-depends and build-depend-indep. As your own arguments show, this would cost very little since few packages actually have build-depend-indep. But those that do, in anticipation of a world in which bui

Processed: tagging 494294

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34 > tags 494294 + confirmed Bug#494294: dfo: includes binary-only copy of FlickrNet in source tarball (DFSG §2 violation) There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > End of m

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 22:34:47 +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > This is ridiculous. If the buildds do "debian/rules binary" they They don't. They use 'clean', 'build' and 'binary-arch'. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

Sorry; I meant "build-arch". But the point stands: if you know that you're building everything, both -arch and -indep, why not just pull in the -indep build dependencies and actually solve the problem? --Barak. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Processed: Re: Bug#494294: dfo: includes binary-only copy of FlickrNet in source tarball (DFSG §2 violation)

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > tags 494294 + patch Bug#494294: dfo: includes binary-only copy of FlickrNet in source tarball (DFSG §2 violation) Tags were: confirmed Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tr

Bug#494294: dfo: includes binary-only copy of FlickrNet in source tarball (DFSG §2 violation)

tags 494294 + patch thanks Hi, On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Jo Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shipping binary-only copies of libraries violates §2 of the Debian Free > Software Guidelines [0]. Also, binary-only distribution makes security > support impossible. Thus I am filing a Serious

Bug#494508: marked as done (FTBFS: No rule to make target `for')

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:17:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#494508: fixed in scheme2c 1993.3.15.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #494508, regarding FTBFS: No rule to make target `for' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#494622: emdebian-rootfs: two suite scripts force installation of conflicting packages

Package: emdebian-rootfs Version: 1.4.1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.4 emdebian-rootfs includes multiple suite scripts for root filesystem generation using debootstrap --foreign and two of these suite scripts (the two related to the smallest installations) have not been updated to ref

Bug#451303: suggestions?

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 09:38, Eric Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ Aren Olson ] >> Packaging them raises a few problems, namely >> >> 1) our current architecture isn't designed to support this >> 2) we can't distribute updates to plugins quickly if, for example, the >> API for a particular we

Bug#494294: marked as done (dfo: includes binary-only copy of FlickrNet in source tarball (DFSG §2 violation))

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#494294: fixed in dfo 0.7+svn51-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #494294, regarding dfo: includes binary-only copy of FlickrNet in source tarball (DFSG §2 violation) to be marked as done.

  1   2   >