Package: synergy
Followup-For: Bug #449255
Dunno what's different in my setup, but it is not crashing here, with
both systems being 32 bit Debian testing PCs.
I suggest lowering severity to important as it seems it's not completely
unusable (at least for me).
Best regards,
-- System Informatio
severity 482158 normal
thanks
On Wed, 21 May 2008, John Tait wrote:
> Package: sql-ledger
> Version: 2.6.22-2
> Severity: serious
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
> This may not directly be a sql-ledger problem but I don't know what other
> package to file it under.
> The l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 482158 normal
Bug#482158: [sql-ledger] dependency problems in "testing" release
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Package: gupnp-tools
Version: 0.4-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of gupnp-tools_0.4-1 on lebrun by sbuild/sparc 98
> Build started at 20080520-0934
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 02:12:50AM -0400, Rene Mayorga wrote:
>On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:02:25AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>Actually I missed that html2wiki binary pokes the user about this
>change (yes, I was one despite user too :))
>So I'm o
forcemerge 20471 481823
thanks
On Sun, 18 May 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Using "dpkg -i" I was able to upgrade a package to a newer version,
> introducing a dependency break on a Provides-ed package.
This is nothing new and it's not serious, it has always been so. Merging
with the other du
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 09:14 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > Package libsoup-2.4 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
> > Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libsoup-2.4.pc'
> > to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
> > Package 'libsoup-2.4', required by 'gupnp-1.0',
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:08:13PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
>The "AT&T search_engines.pm" (478968) bug is probably a bit inflated in
>severity, but since it's so trivial to fix I'd rather do that then
>downgrade it (and leave it to rot).
>
>T
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> found 481965 bugzilla/2.22.1-2
Bug#481965: bugzilla: Bugzilla fails to run with perl 5.10
Bug marked as found in version bugzilla/2.22.1-2.
>
End of message, stopping processing here
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 143307 important
Bug#143307: [ASSERT] main/packages.c:191: process_queue: Assertion `dependtry
<= 4' failed
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
severity 143307 important
thanks
On Mon, 05 May 2008, Gunter Ohrner wrote:
> Followup-For: Bug #143307
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.14.18
>
> When trying to upgrade my SID system as I do every few days, dpkg crashed
> with the above mentioned assertion failure.
AFAIK, this error message happens
Your message dated Wed, 21 May 2008 07:52:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426224: fixed in sysvinit 2.86.ds1-38+etchnhalf.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #426224,
regarding /sbin/shutdown fails to properly spindown drive
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Wed, 21 May 2008 07:52:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426224: fixed in sysvinit 2.86.ds1-38+etchnhalf.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #426224,
regarding Please update shutdown
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 21 May 2008 07:52:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426224: fixed in sysvinit 2.86.ds1-38+etchnhalf.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #426224,
regarding Please update shutdown to support libata drivers in newer kernels
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Wed, 21 May 2008 09:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#482160: fixed in gupnp-tools 0.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #482160,
regarding gupnp-tools_0.4-1(sparc/unstable): FTBFS, missing build-deps
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:26:40PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> how do we continue here? Is the issue "just" that the headers are being
> moved twice? This bug blocks testing migration of python2.5 and epiphany
> which is a precondition for getting gcc-4.3 and gcc-defaults moved.
The fix in the e
* Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080521 12:13]:
> that looks ok for now, we can work on the unification of the headers
> later.
In case Thiemo agrees (or doesn't disagree) - do you plan to upload it?
Should I NMU it? ...?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSU
that looks ok for now, we can work on the unification of the headers
later.
Matthias
Arthur Loiret writes:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:26:40PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > how do we continue here? Is the issue "just" that the headers are being
> > moved twice? This bug blocks testing migrat
Package: ttfm
Version: 0.1-1.1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of ttfm_0.1-1.1 on lebrun by sbuild/sparc 98
> Build started at 20080521-0956
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: deb
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 09:49:01AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I have no objections to you NMU'ing.
>
> Or even better: How would you like to join our little team maintaining
> awstats?
I don't have any deeper awstats knowledge, and I'm not even a perl guru,
but sure.. I've been running aws
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.27
#
# gnugk (2:2.2.7-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Remove useless help2man call for addpasswd.1
#- gnugk - FTBFS: Segmentation fault obj_linux_s390_r/addpasswd --
#help 2> /dev/null (Closes: #478502)
#
package gnug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.27
> #
> # gnugk (2:2.2.7-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Remove useless help2man call for addpasswd.1
> #- gnugk - FTBFS: Segmentation fault obj_linux_s390_r/addpasswd --
Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080521 12:13]:
> > that looks ok for now, we can work on the unification of the headers
> > later.
>
> In case Thiemo agrees (or doesn't disagree) - do you plan to upload it?
> Should I NMU it? ...?
I disagree, because I was confused ab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:56:52PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
>On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 09:49:01AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> I have no objections to you NMU'ing.
>>
>> Or even better: How would you like to join our little team
>> maintai
Package: compizconfig-backend-gconf
Version: 0.7.4-2
Severity: serious
Heya,
Building your package failed due to missing build-deps:
| Automatic build of compizconfig-backend-gconf_0.7.4-2 on lebrun by
sbuild/sparc 98
| Build started at 20080521-1326
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.28
#
# compizconfig-backend-gconf (0.7.4-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Add build-dep on libxml2-dev (closes: #482192).
package compizconfig-backend-gconf
tags 482192 + pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.28
> #
> # compizconfig-backend-gconf (0.7.4-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Add build-dep on libxml2-dev (closes: #482192).
> package compizconfig-backend-gconf
Ignoring bugs not a
Package: compizconfig-settings-manager
Version: 0.7.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
/usr/bin/ccsm
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/ccsm", line 38, in
import compizconfig
ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/compizconfig.so: undefined
sy
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 14:23:59 +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
> Package: compizconfig-settings-manager
> Version: 0.7.4-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> /usr/bin/ccsm
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/ccsm", line 38, in
> import compizconf
python-compizconfig is still at an old version but then we should
introduce a version dependency ...
--eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 14:23:59 +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
>
>
>> Package: compizconfig-settings-manager
>> Version: 0.7.4-1
>> Severity: grave
>> Justification: renders package unusable
>>
>> /usr/bin/ccsm
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "/usr/bin/ccsm",
> > Or even better: How would you like to join our little team maintaining
> > awstats?
>
> I don't have any deeper awstats knowledge, and I'm not even a perl guru,
> but sure.. I've been running awstats for a long time and I have no plans
> to stop using it anytime soon, so I'm interested in seein
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 472106 0.79.0-4
Bug#472106: sugar: Segfaults after initially entering name
Bug no longer marked as found in version 0.79.0-4.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
> notfixed 472106 0.79.0-4
Bug#472106: sugar: Segfaults after ini
Simon Josefsson wrote:
Severity: serious
Package: courier
Version: 0.59.0-1
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: nonfree-doc rfc
Hi!
This source package contains the following files that claim to be
released under the non-free IETF license in RFC 2026:
courier-0.59.0.orig/courier/doc/draft-vars
Package: shibboleth-sp
Version: 1.3f.dfsg1-7
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, becau
Package: motion
Version: 3.2.9-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
i
Package: kwave
Version: 0.7.10-1.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: python-tempita
Version: 0.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: liblog-agent-rotate-perl
Version: 0.104-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2,
Package: gupnp-tools
Version: 0.4-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.
Package: kdesdk
Version: 4:3.5.9-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: mlt
Version: 0.2.4-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
is n
Package: moc
Version: 1:2.5.0~alpha3-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: gupnp-ui
Version: 0.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
i
Package: soprano
Version: 2.0.3-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: libwibble
Version: 0.1.16
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: serf
Version: 0.1.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
is
Package: libept
Version: 0.5.17
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
is
Package: libavg
Version: 0.7.0-6
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
i
Package: evince
Version: 2.20.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: opencv
Version: 1.0.0-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
i
Package: librpc-xml-perl
Version: 0.60-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because g
Package: libio-zlib-perl
Version: 1.09-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because g
Package: freej
Version: 0.9.1+dl0-3.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: ktoon
Version: 0.8.1-3.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: rhythmbox
Version: 0.11.5-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4
Package: libapache2-mod-perl2
Version: 2.0.4-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, bec
Package: qwtplot3d
Version: 0.2.7+svn191-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: ruby-gnome2
Version: 0.16.0-11
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gc
Package: libgnomedb3
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: pyspi
Version: 0.6.1-1.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: tdb
Version: 1.1.2~git20080520-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: libparse-debcontrol-perl
Version: 2.005-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2,
Package: libmodule-build-perl
Version: 0.2808.01-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2,
Package: mixxx
Version: 1.6.0~beta2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: fslview
Version: 3.0+4.0.2-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: qimageblitz
Version: 1:0.0.4-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gc
Package: brltty
Version: 3.10~r3715-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: apache2
Version: 2.2.8-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: ffmpeg2theora
Version: 0.19-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: kdesvn
Version: 0.14.3-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: subversion
Version: 1.4.6dfsg1-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: plplot
Version: 5.9.0-7
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
i
Package: xtrkcad
Version: 1:4.0.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.
Package: qantenna
Version: 0.2.0-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: synfig
Version: 0.61.08-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: screenkast
Version: 0.1.4-2.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: libapreq2
Version: 2.08-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: kmchart
Version: 1.2.6
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
is
Package: soqt
Version: 1.4.1-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
is
Package: camlp5
Version: 5.07-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
is
Package: librra
Version: 0.11-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
is
Package: gnusound
Version: 0.7.4-7
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: xmms2
Version: 0.4DrKosmos-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: libinstrudeo
Version: 0.1.4-4.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because g
Package: rapidsvn
Version: 0.9.6-0.2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4
Package: gtk-qt-engine
Version: 1:0.8-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gc
Package: speedy-cgi-perl
Version: 2.22-9
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because g
Package: gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg
Version: 0.10.3.3-1
Severity: serious
File: /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstffmpeg.so
Trying to play an avi file with totem, I get:
(totem:5495): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin
'/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstffmpeg.so':
/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstffmpe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.28
> merge 482261 482160
Bug#482160: gupnp-tools_0.4-1(sparc/unstable): FTBFS, missing build-deps
Bug#482261: gupnp-tools: FTBFS: Package requirements (gupnp-1.0 >= 0.10) were
not met
Me
merge 482232 479193
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: shibboleth-sp
> Version: 1.3f.dfsg1-7
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your pack
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.28
> close 482261
Bug#482261: gupnp-tools: FTBFS: Package requirements (gupnp-1.0 >= 0.10) were
not met
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug close
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 08:27:25AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:> Package: xfsprogs
:> Version: 2.8.11-1
:> Severity: critical
:> Justification: breaks the whole system
:>
:> XFS on 32bit Linux cannot mount filesystems >16T see:
:> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00124.html
:>
:> xfs
Package: libqt4-ruby
Version: 1.4.10-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: opensaml
Version: 1.1b-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: apache2-mpm-itk
Version: 2.2.6-01-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, becau
Package: ttf-cjk-compact
Version: 1.12
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: kcemirror
Version: 0.1.5-1.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
merge 482243 479191
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: opensaml
> Version: 1.1b-3
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed
Hi,
we submited this bug after an upgrade, but we've discovered that
probably the problem is on sqlrealy 1:0.39.4-1 or sqlrelay-postgresql
and not on rudiments.
Sorry for the wrong notice.
Enrico Pibiri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
