Package: vdr-plugin-xineliboutput
Version: 1.0.0~rc2-14
Severity: grave
There is a new version of libxine1 on the archives which makes this package
uninstallable because of its dependency on libxine1 (<< 1.1.12), typically
this should be solved by recompiling vdr-plugin-xineliboutput against the
n
Frank Lichtenheld schrieb:
It is not (AFAICT from a random sample of the build logs). hppa is just the
most picky about it.
I fear you are confused by the build logs. The build is run twice,
once for the static libraries (without -FPIC -DPIC) and then again for
the shared libraries (With -fP
Package: iceweasel
Version: 2.0.0.13-1
Severity: grave
amd64
It may be a problem in the lib package, but there is no
libhunspell* bug page
Currently I've libhunspell-1.2-0 installed.
Still the dependency doesn't let me install iceweasel.
thanks
--
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
http://www.webthatworks
I have only checked build logs for ffmpeg-free_0.cvs20071007-4, not
for ffmpeg-free_0.svn20080206-1 from experimental. Obviously I have
been confused, too. ;)
However, I have added another option --extra-cflags="-fPIC -DPIC" to
debian/rules for the build of the shared library in SVN. Could som
Package: ace
Version: 5.6.3-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of ace_5.6.3-1 on lebrun by sbuild/sparc 98
> Build started at 20080417-0903
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: autoco
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> notfound 476006 8.3.5-11
Bug#476006: tcl8.3: FTBFS: ./../generic/tclClock.c:310: error: 'timezone'
undeclared (first use in this function)
Bug no longer marked as found in version 8.
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#475964: fixed in lua-coxpcall 1.11.0+cvs20080310-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #475964,
regarding file conflicts between packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
We would like to thank John from FL, USA for sending us his before and after
photos and also letting us show them on our site.
http://afroolei.com
I've played on and off with pumps, weights, and exercises for the last few
years and have never gained one centimeter. I recently began LNH Maxdik
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 475678 important
Bug#475678: banshee crashes on startup
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 01:45:38AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> ucspi-tcp should conflict with courier-mta as it shares a file with
> that package:
Hi Ralf, is there a specific reason why you file this bug on the
ucspi-tcp package, and not courier-mta, or both packages?
Thanks, Gerrit.
--
To
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 476456 tftpd-hpa
Bug#476456: should conflict with atftpd
Warning: Unknown package 'ftpd-hpa'
Bug reassigned from package `ftpd-hpa' to `tftpd-hpa'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Fabian Greffrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I fear you are confused by the build logs. The build is run twice,
> once for the static libraries (without -FPIC -DPIC) and then again for
> the shared libraries (With -fPIC -DPIC).
> I have checked the logs for some other archs and they all get th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 475164 lm-sensors
Bug#475164: lm-sensors-2.4.27-4-686: version -4 of the package does not contain
the actual object files
Warning: Unknown package 'lm-sensors-2.4.27-4-686'
Bug reassigned from package `lm-sensors-2.4.27-4-686' to `lm-sensors'.
On Thursday 17 April 2008, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Package: ace
> Version: 5.6.3-1
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> > Automatic build of ace_5.6.3-1 on lebrun by sbuild/sparc 98
> > Build started at 20080417-
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:47:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#476042: fixed in varmon 1.2.0-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #476042,
regarding varmon: FTBFS: /usr/bin/make: invalid option -- 2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
tags 476070 + patch
quit
>From f76638323828d8753cf43bc0d4c1109b60c8f146 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:49:39 +
Subject: [PATCH] * debian/rules: install: force remove also auto_home.c
before re-doing
upstream targets install, ins
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 476070 + patch
Bug#476070: ucspi-tcp: FTBFS: install: fatal: unable to write
.../bin/tcpserver: access denied
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracki
Reinhard Tartler schrieb:
I wonder why mipsen don't show the same problem, though. Maybe they have
no problem with non-pic code in libraries as i386 has? in that case, the
solution would be obvious: adding hppa to the quoted list...
Well, maybe. However, could you please check my latest SVN com
Hello,
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:52:15AM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Please try give back the build with a dep-wait on libqt4-dev (>=4.4~rc1-4) -
> it has most likely fixed this issue.
Thanks for the notice. Anyway, there's another missing build-dependency
on Fox, so ace will definite
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:07:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #474758,
regarding avoid migration to testing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#475619: fixed in runit 1.8.0-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #475619,
regarding runit: Missing dependency on procps
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 01:45:38 +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Package: ucspi-tcp
> Version: 1:0.88-1
> Severity: serious
>
> ucspi-tcp should conflict with courier-mta as it shares a file with
> that package:
>
Unless the conflicting files have the same functionality, this shouldn't
be solved by
Package: python-hid
Version: 0.2.15+20060325-2.1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
serrano> python
Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Mar 9 2008, 03:52:30)
[GCC 4.3.0 20080301 (prerelease) [gcc-4_3-branch revision 132801]] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "licens
Package: mnemosyne
Version: 1.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch hardy
This bug was reported on
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mnemosyne/+bug/206958
If mnemosyne is started and python-xml is not installed (the dependency
was d
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:21:13PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-16 22:05]:
> > Thanks for the help. I have made a patch that would fix the possible
> > buffer overflows. Please check the attached patch.
> [...]
> > if(path[0]!='/')
> > - sprintf(
Hi, Lucas, thanks as always for your QA work.
The build log you posted is a little odd. Compare it to the buildd
log[0], which was successful, and you see the failing call to ld
differs:
your line: ld -o libcgi-java.so cgi-java.o
buildd line: ld -fpic -shared -lc -o libcgi-java.so cgi-java.o
T
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#475619: fixed in daemontools 1:0.76-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #475619,
regarding runit: Missing dependency on procps
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
On 17/04/08 at 11:32 +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> Hi, Lucas, thanks as always for your QA work.
>
> The build log you posted is a little odd. Compare it to the buildd
> log[0], which was successful, and you see the failing call to ld
> differs:
>
> your line: ld -o libcgi-java.so cgi-java.o
>
Hi Martin,
According to [0] there may have been a problem with qt4-dev, which is
now fixed. Can you schedule a rebuild to check whether this bug is still
in existence.
Thanks,
Matt
0. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/04/msg00465.html
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Dig
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.20
> severity 454826 serious
Bug#454826: FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing #includes
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:33:09AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Reinhard Tartler schrieb:
> >I wonder why mipsen don't show the same problem, though. Maybe they have
> >no problem with non-pic code in libraries as i386 has? in that case, the
> >solution would be obvious: adding hppa to the quot
Package: debian-archive-keyring
Version: 2008.04.16
Severity: serious
Hello,
debian-archive-keyring is now unconfigurable if gnupg is not installed.
For more information, see the attached file. It is a log of
cdebootstrap -q --allow-unauthenticated sid /var/tmp/dfs/target
http://localhost
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:45:04 +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.20
> > found 454826 0.8.0+svn20080310-1
> Bug#454826: FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing #includes
>
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:32:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#475970: fixed in irda-utils 0.9.18-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #475970,
regarding irda-utils: FTBFS: cc1: error: unrecognised debug output level " -O2
-Wall"
to be marked as done.
T
Package: qemu
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
Justification: breaks unrelated packages
The following code prompts the user into running these commands (or otherwise
qemu won't start):
osdep.c:"umount /dev/shm\n"
osdep.c:"moun
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#476017: fixed in zimpl 2.07.ds1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #476017,
regarding zimpl: FTBFS: /bin/sh: -O2: command not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Thu Apr 17 14:46, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Are you setting LDFLAGS in your build? If so, what is the correct way to
> > solve this? (I'm upstream as well)
> >
> >- remove the ? in the makefile
> >- set LDFLAGS in debian/rules
> >- move -lc or all of the flags to a different variabl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
> forwarded 455415
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=513481&aid=1942245&group_id=66144
Bug#455415: FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing #includes
Noted your statement that Bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
> forwarded 455415 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail
Bug#455415: FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing #includes
Forwarded-to-address changed from
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?fu
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#475988: fixed in swapspace 1.10-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #475988,
regarding swapspace: FTBFS: cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wall
-g --std=c99 --pedantic -Wshadow"
tag 476161 +pending
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:05:02PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: xmldiff
> Version: 0.6.8-3+b1
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > Automatic build of xmldiff_0.6.8-3+b1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 98
> [...
tags 476169 patch
thanks
Attached is a patch which fixes this bug.
thanks,
stew
diff -ruN capisuite-0.4.5.orig/debian/patches/python2.5-fix-build.diff capisuite-0.4.5/debian/patches/python2.5-fix-build.diff
--- capisuite-0.4.5.orig/debian/patches/python2.5-fix-build.diff 1969-12-31 19:00:00.0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 476169 patch
Bug#476169: capisuite: FTBFS: cannot convert 'int*' to 'Py_ssize_t*'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#476161: fixed in xmldiff 0.6.8-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #476161,
regarding xmldiff - FTBFS: SyntaxError: from __future__ imports must occur at
the beginning of the file
to be mark
Package: mumble-server
Version: 1.1.3-2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
Hi!
While installing dpkg aborts because "do_configuration" is not a known
command. Just move to function to the begin of the script (patch
Hi Mohammed,
* Mohammed Sameer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-17 15:53]:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:21:13PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-16 22:05]:
> > > Thanks for the help. I have made a patch that would fix the possible
> > > buffer overflows. Please check the a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 476117 476496 476510
Bug#476117: http support broken on amd64
Bug#476496: [subversion] subversion doesn't recognize http URIs anymore
Bug#476510: subversion seems to be broken (/usr/lib/libsvn_ra_dav-1.so.0 should
be in package "libsvn1" but
On 17/04/08 at 13:29 +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Thu Apr 17 14:46, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Are you setting LDFLAGS in your build? If so, what is the correct way to
> > > solve this? (I'm upstream as well)
> > >
> > >- remove the ? in the makefile
> > >- set LDFLAGS in debian/rul
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 19:00:14 Gonéri Le Bouder wrote:
> tag 455429 patch
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> This is fixed in the last upstream release. I attached a patch.
Hello Gonéri,
I see you are interrested in this package, and, as this package is sort of
unmaintained, would you be willing to hijac
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#476274: fixed in spambayes 1.0.4-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #476274,
regarding spambayes: seems to break completely after Python transition
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: phpgroupware
Version: 1:0.9.16.012+dfsg-2
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
It is possible to upgrade to new epoch 1 packages, then purge the old
phpgroupware epoch 0 packages, which leads to erasal of config values and
database.
The new phpgroupware epoch1 pac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11ubuntu4
> severity 476229 grave
Bug#476229: pygtk-2.0: pkgconfig path set wrong
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Thanks (please tell the bug); someone please try to find out why the
rtupdate script isn't called or doesn't work, I don't have the time
right now
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I saw that you are discussing the pygtk-2.0 problem on [1].
> The problem is more severe than th
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#475227: fixed in audit 1.5.3-2+lenny1
has caused the Debian Bug report #475227,
regarding auditd: CVE-2008-1628 buffer overflow in audit_log_user_command
function might lead to code executi
> It is possible to upgrade to new epoch 1 packages, then purge the old
> phpgroupware epoch 0 packages, which leads to erasal of config values and
> database.
>
> The new phpgroupware epoch1 package is not depended-upon by other epoch 1
> packages. So it's possible to upgrade to the new pack
Hi.
By testing a bit further the upgrade path from epoch0 to epoch1
packages, I have discovered a nasty bug
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=476559) which can lead
to loss of all phpgroupware data :(
So, please DO NOT PURGE the removed phpgroupware (epoch 0) package.
Thanks for
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 04:24:47PM +0200, Jiri Palecek wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 April 2008 19:00:14 Gonéri Le Bouder wrote:
> > tag 455429 patch
> > thanks
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is fixed in the last upstream release. I attached a patch.
>
> Hello Gonéri,
>
> I see you are interrested in this p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package qbrew
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: qbrew
> tag 475742 pending
Bug#475742: qbrew: FTBFS: ERROR: could not build a simple Qt program.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
package qbrew
tag 475742 pending
thanks
I can confirm that the last upload of qt4-x11 (4.4.0~rc1-4) fixes the
problem you've reported on i386. However, I'll wait with a new upload a
couple more days to ensure that the new version of qt4 is available on
all buildds.
Regards,
Tobias
--
Tobias Toe
Package: usbutils
Version: 0.73-7
Severity: grave
File: /usr/sbin/lsusb
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi
Here the usb dongle on bus 2, which used to be shown, and the
mouse are missing, both have been connected after boot:
$ lsusb
Bus 001 Device 004: ID 046a:0001 Cherry GmbH My3000 Key
Hi,
is there any news on this?
I mistakenly opened a new bug (#475852), but it happens also on a HP Compaq
6720s.
David
--
. ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
: :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
`. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://snipr.com/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package qbrew
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: qbrew
> tag 475813 pending
Bug#475813: qbrew_0.4.0-2(sparc/unstable): /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -laudio
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
package qbrew
tag 475813 pending
thanks
I think that this bug is fixed with the last upload of qt4-x11
(4.4.0~rc1-4). However, I'll wait with a new upload a couple more days
to ensure that the new version of qt4 is available on all buildds.
Regards,
Tobias
--
Tobias Toedter | "To be is to do"
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 476229 + patch
Bug#476229: rtupdate scripts not run during transition to python2.5
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 476229 critical
Bug#476229: pygtk-2.0: pkgconfig path set wrong
Severity set to `critical' from `grave'
> retitle 476229 rtupdate scripts not run during transition to python2.5
Bug#476229: pygtk-2.0: pkgconfig path set wrong
Changed Bug title
severity 476229 critical
retitle 476229 rtupdate scripts not run during transition to python2.5
reassign 476229 python 2.5.2-0.1
thanks
Le jeudi 17 avril 2008 à 16:50 +0200, Loïc Minier a écrit :
> Thanks (please tell the bug); someone please try to find out why the
> rtupdate script isn't called
tags 476229 + patch
thanks
Hi,
attached is a patch for that issue.
--
.''`.
: :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
`-our own. Resistance is futile.
diff -Nru python-defaults-2.5.2/de
reassign 476564 udev
forcemerge 476564 438470
thanks
Arthur Korn a écrit :
> Package: usbutils
> Version: 0.73-7
> Severity: grave
> File: /usr/sbin/lsusb
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Hi
>
> Here the usb dongle on bus 2, which used to be shown, and the
> mouse are missing, both
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 476564 udev
Bug#476564: /usr/sbin/lsusb: doesn't show devices connected after boot even
though they are in /proc/bus/usb/devices
Bug reassigned from package `usbutils' to `udev'.
> forcemerge 476564 438470
Bug#476564: /usr/sbin/lsusb: doesn't
Package: synopsis
Version: 0.10-0.2
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source.
| Automatic build of synopsis_0.10-0.2 on njoerd by sbuild/sparc 98-farm
| Build started at 20080417-1404
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 475164 + sarge
Bug#475164: lm-sensors-2.4.27-4-686: version -4 of the package does not contain
the actual object files
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
>
End of messag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> found 475164 1:2.9.1-1sarge4
Bug#475164: lm-sensors-2.4.27-4-686: version -4 of the package does not contain
the actual object files
Bug marked as found in version 1:2.9.1-1sarge4.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.20
> tags 476559 + pending
Bug#476559: Upgrading to new phpgroupware packages can be incomplete, risk of
loosing all data
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, s
On Thu Apr 17 17:53, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > if [ -z "$LDFLAGS" ]; then unset LDFLAGS; fi (or the Make equivelant)
> > might work.
>
> What about using += instead of ?= ?
Hmm.. I suppose none of those people are likely to want to override,
rather than just append to
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 05:13:05PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> By testing a bit further the upgrade path from epoch0 to epoch1
> packages, I have discovered a nasty bug
> (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=476559) which can lead
> to loss of all phpgroupware data :(
>
>
I have successfully built sketch 0.2.59-3 in an amd64 sid qemubuilder with
gcc 4.2 and gcc 4.3.
Any ideas for how to test? I guess I can install a real amd64 system
and make an i386 chroot. If the problem is with building in an i386
chroot on amd64 is that still an RC bug?
David
pgp0TEeuApq
reassign 476532 apt
severity 476532 important
thanks
Jiří Paleček wrote:
> Package: debian-archive-keyring
It's apt that is failing not debian-archive-keyring... and
debian-archive-keyring does recommend gnupg ...
> Hello,
Hi
> debian-archive-keyring is now unconfigurable if gnupg is not insta
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 476532 apt
Bug#476532: debian-archive-keyring: unconfigurable due to missing gnupg
Bug reassigned from package `debian-archive-keyring' to `apt'.
> severity 476532 important
Bug#476532: debian-archive-keyring: unconfigurable due to missing gnu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
> severity 476095 critical
Bug#476095: misses rtupdate script
Severity set to `critical' from `serious'
> reassign 476095 python-defaults
Bug#476095: misses rtupdate script
Bug reassi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
> reassign 476095 python
Bug#476095: misses rtupdate script
Bug reassigned from package `python-defaults' to `python'.
> merge 476229 476095
Bug#476095: misses rtupdate script
Bug#476
Package: aptlinex
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
With this it will happily remove pdmenu, while presenting a UI that
doesn't make that plain to the user. For more fun, could try libc6- ,
or some other library that will make apt unhappy. (I haven't tried that.)
With this is will
Hi.
I think more appropriate to continue this discussion in bug #476559 as
it's the one which I filed for this upgrade problems.
Le jeudi 17 avril 2008 à 11:53 +0200, Alexander Klauer a écrit :
> Olivier Berger:
> > > I'm surprised that it would have been to be removed, instead of upgraded
> > >
Package: openoffice.org-voikko
Version: 2.2-2
Severity: serious
Unfortunately I didn't think about/notice this either, but a etch->sid
dist-upgrade with openoffice.org-voikko involved now fails with the
scriplets using -env.
Stripped log from the dist-upgrade:
Preconfiguring packages ...
[...]
P
Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 00:47 +0200 schrieb Frans Pop:
> block 476476 by 476480
> thanks
>
> On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> > compiling cairo without libpixman is not possible anymore, the only
> > other solution would be static linking for the udeb.
>
> That's the le
Package: dkimproxy
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
dkimproxy runs as user root, but it dos not need the rigths of the user
root, to fix this change /etc/init.d/dkimproxy:
30,31c30,31
< DKIMPROXY
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tags: pending
Jan Hauke Rahm schrieb:
> Hi!
>
> While installing dpkg aborts because "do_configuration" is not a known
> command. Just move to function to the begin of the script (patch below,
> hope it works).
>
> By the way, thanks for packaging!
On Thursday 17 April 2008, you wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 00:47 +0200 schrieb Frans Pop:
> > Note that cairo will need to be rebuilt against the new version of
> > pixman before the bug is completely solved as libcairo-directfb2-udeb
> > currently depends on the regular libpixman packa
Package: php5-idn
Version: 1.2b-5.2
Severity: grave
In a script analysing domain names translating them to ascii using the
idn_to_ascii function, php5 segfaults
after about 11 minutes of excessive use of the function (100 invokes/sec).
Hope this backtrace is useful.
#0 0x2b4da1813090 in st
python-defaults-2.5.2-0.2-nmu.diff does NOT fix the PyGTK problem.
-SD
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=476229#58
2008/4/17, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> > please do NOT misunderstand me: It was just a feedback, not the requ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 367182 serious
Bug#367182: freebsd-manpages: please co-exist with linux-manpages
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
Package: gforge-plugins-extra
Version: 4.6.99+svn6477-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
gforge-plugins-extra refuses to install when gforge-plugin-mediawiki is
installed:
pkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/gforge-plugins-extra_4.6.99+svn6477-1_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/shar
Package: amanda-server
Version: 1:2.5.2p1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.5.1
When I attempt to upgrade amanda from version 2.5.2pl-2 to version
2.5.2pl-3, I get:
Preparing to replace amanda-server 1:2.5.2p1-2 (using
.../amanda-server_1%3a2.5.2p1-3_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replaceme
Package: graphicsmagick-libmagick-dev-compat
Version: 1.1.11-1
Severity: serious
graphicsmagick-libmagick-dev-compat fails to install when either one
of libmagick++9-dev or libmagick9-dev is installed:
Unpacking graphicsmagick-libmagick-dev-compat (from
.../graphicsmagick-libmagick-dev-compat_1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 476583 +pending
Bug#476583: amanda-server: File conflict with amanda-common
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 08:18:30AM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> Hi Ralf, is there a specific reason why you file this bug on the
> ucspi-tcp package, and not courier-mta, or both packages?
Hi Gerrit,
no, not really. In this case (I am curently processing a whole list
of bugs of this nature) this
Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:02:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#470630: fixed in slrn 0.9.9~pre99-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #470630,
regarding file conflicts between packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
tags 476583 +pending
thanks
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 14:54 -0400, Andrew Moise wrote:
> amanda-server should still have the appropriate Replaces: field set so that
> it'll work the first time.
Yep, thanks for catching that.
There was already suitable Replaces: entries for each package, but I
neg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
> tags 476241 + patch
Bug#476241: mt-daapd: CVE-2008-1771 integer overflow allowing remote DoS and
possibly arbitrary code execution
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
>
End of me
Hi,
attached is a patch fixing this issue.
It will be also archived on:
http://people.debian.org/~nion/nmu-diff/mt-daapd-0.9~r1696-1.2_0.9~r1696-1.3.patch
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
