Package: nessus-libraries
Version: 2.2.10-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, becaus
Package: zimpl
Version: 2.05.ds2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: unison
Version: 2.13.16-9
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: starplot
Version: 0.95.4-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.
Package: ocaml-taglib
Version: 0.1.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: suck
Version: 4.3.2-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> /build/user/python-scipy-0.6.0/build/src.linux-i686-2.4/fortranobject.c:27:
> undefined reference to `PyDict_SetItemString'
> >
> /build/user/python-scipy-0.6.0/build/src.linux-i686-2.4/fortranobject.c:21:
> und
Package: iceowl
Version: 0.7-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is
Package: netdude
Version: 0.3.3-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Hi Lucas,
Thanks for your report.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 01:42:06PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: rrdtool
> Version: 1.2.27-1
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
[...]
> > checking for C compiler default ou
Package: dvgrab
Version: 3.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is
Package: openbox
Version: 3.4.6.1-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.
Package: libaudio-moosic-perl
Version: 0.09-1.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, be
Package: libwww-opensearch-perl
Version: 0.13-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, be
Package: gcal
Version: 3.01.1-5.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.20
> retitle 475708 testdisk: FTBFS: error: expected ) before * token
Bug#475708: testdisk: FTBFS:
Changed Bug title to `testdisk: FTBFS: error: expected ) before * token' from
`testdisk
Package: qtractor
Version: 0.1.0-1.2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4
Package: xdemineur
Version: 2.1.1-12
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4
Package: ocaml-shout
Version: 0.2.5-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: tct
Version: 1.11-6.4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is
Package: tclreadline
Version: 2.1.0-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: bitcollider
Version: 0.4.0-3.3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gc
Package: mplayer
Version: 1.0~rc2-10
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4
Package: python-scipy
Version: 0.6.0-10
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gc
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:36:24 +0200, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> I have already solved this bug for package unison2.13.16 (should be in
> NEW).
>
> The real problem is that CFLAGS is set and means Compilations FLAGS for
> the unison makefile. So it uses this flags for the OCaml compiler, which
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
> tags 475967 pending
Bug#475967: file conflicts between packages
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
checking for gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler cannot
create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 77
Could you please send me the config.log file. I fail to repr
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:04:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libooc-x11-dev has been removed from Debian, closing #402194
has caused the Debian Bug report #402194,
regarding libocc-x11: FTBFS: cp: missing destination file operand after
`oo2crc.tmp'
to be
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:11:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line nyello has been removed from Debian, closing #452635
has caused the Debian Bug report #452635,
regarding Does not get any real connection to xmms2d
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:08:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line schooltool has been removed from Debian, closing #422373
has caused the Debian Bug report #422373,
regarding schooltool: FTBFS: build-dep python2.4-schoolbell uninstallable
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:05:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ion3-mod-ionflux has been removed from Debian, closing #416324
has caused the Debian Bug report #416324,
regarding FTBFS: needs udpate for new ion3-dev in unstable
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:08:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line php4-apd has been removed from Debian, closing #418319
has caused the Debian Bug report #418319,
regarding Don't build a php4-specific package because of php4's removal
to be marked as done.
Th
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:13:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line pugs has been removed from Debian, closing #427315
has caused the Debian Bug report #427315,
regarding pugs: FTBFS: Module `Control.Monad.RWS' does not export `MonadIO(..)'
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:04:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libooc-x11-dev has been removed from Debian, closing #394638
has caused the Debian Bug report #394638,
regarding libocc-x11: FTBFS: cp: missing destination file operand after
`oo2crc.tmp'
to be
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:52:32PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:36:24 +0200, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
>
> > I have already solved this bug for package unison2.13.16 (should be in
> > NEW).
> >
> > The real problem is that CFLAGS is set and means Compilations FL
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:14:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libdb3-ruby has been removed from Debian, closing #427354
has caused the Debian Bug report #427354,
regarding libdb3-ruby - FTBFS: error: 'struct RString' has no member named 'len'
to be marked
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:11:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line smarteiffel2 has been removed from Debian, closing #426387
has caused the Debian Bug report #426387,
regarding smarteiffel2: FTBFS: usr/lib/smarteiffel2/bin/eiffeltest': No such
file or directo
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:13:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line pugs has been removed from Debian, closing #406081
has caused the Debian Bug report #406081,
regarding pugs_6.2.13-0.1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: No such file
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:04:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libooc-x11-dev has been removed from Debian, closing #394638
has caused the Debian Bug report #394638,
regarding uninstallable, /usr/lib/oo2c/ooconfig: No such file or directory
to be marked as
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:12:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line syncekonnector has been removed from Debian, closing #427308
has caused the Debian Bug report #427308,
regarding syncekonnector: FTBFS: configure: error: Can't find libkonnector.so
to be marked
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:13:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line pugs has been removed from Debian, closing #397622
has caused the Debian Bug report #397622,
regarding pugs - FTBFS: pugs: internal error: adjustor creation not supported
on this platform
to be
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:06:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line php4-kadm5 has been removed from Debian, closing #418315
has caused the Debian Bug report #418315,
regarding Don't build a php4-specific package because of php4's removal
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:08:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line php4-apd has been removed from Debian, closing #450467
has caused the Debian Bug report #450467,
regarding php4-apd: FTBFS: E: Package php4-dev has no installation candidate
to be marked as done
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:11:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line nyello has been removed from Debian, closing #441165
has caused the Debian Bug report #441165,
regarding nyello: fails to install
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:04:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libooc-x11-dev has been removed from Debian, closing #402194
has caused the Debian Bug report #402194,
regarding uninstallable, /usr/lib/oo2c/ooconfig: No such file or directory
to be marked as
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:11:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line nyello has been removed from Debian, closing #427193
has caused the Debian Bug report #427193,
regarding nyello - FTBFS: error: too few arguments to function 'xmmsc_result_t
to be marked as done
Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
> Package: citadel-client, stress
> Severity: serious
> Justification: policy violation
>
> hi,
>
> both citadel-client and stress ship
> `/usr/bin/stress'
> but do neither conflict, nor add a diversion, thus fail to be installed in the
> same environment:
>
> > Unpa
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:17:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#476025: fixed in tclreadline 2.1.0-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #476025,
regarding tclreadline: FTBFS: configure: error: installation or configuration
problem: C compiler cannot creat
Le Monday 14 April 2008 12:24:28 Lucas Nussbaum, vous avez écrit :
> This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is
> now the default on most architectures (even if it's not the case on i386
> yet). Feel free to downgrade this bug to 'important' if your package is
> only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: dbus-glib
Version: 0.74-1
Severity: serious
The private header /usr/include/dbus-1.0/dbus/dbus-glib-error-enum.h
(which defines the contents of an enum) is auto-generated from the
version of libdbus installed on the system that built dbus-gli
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:28:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line silky has been removed from Debian, closing #433820
has caused the Debian Bug report #433820,
regarding Does not build with newer libsilc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:35:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line osgal-cvs has been removed from Debian, closing #445763
has caused the Debian Bug report #445763,
regarding osgal-cvs: FTBFS: unmet b-dep libproducer-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:37:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line sope has been removed from Debian, closing #447365
has caused the Debian Bug report #447365,
regarding sope: FTBFS: undefined reference to `objc_free'
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:40:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line vat has been removed from Debian, closing #450476
has caused the Debian Bug report #450476,
regarding vat: FTBFS: can't find tcl/init.tcl
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 476007 confirmed
Bug#476007: ipv6calc: FTBFS: md5.c:27:20: error: config.h: No such file or
directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
tag 476007 confirmed
thanks
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:48:19PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: ipv6calc
> Version: 0.71.0-1
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
> > gcc -O2 -Wall -g -I -I.. -fPIC -o md5.o -c -s
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:39:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnustep-ppd has been removed from Debian, closing #450457
has caused the Debian Bug report #450457,
regarding gnustep-ppd: FTBFS: /bin/sh:
/usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Library/Makefiles/GNUstep.sh:
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:39:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line audacious-plugins-ugly has been removed from Debian, closing
#450445
has caused the Debian Bug report #450445,
regarding audacious-plugins-ugly: FTBFS: error: audacious/beepctrl.h: No such
fil
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:44:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line missinglib has been removed from Debian, closing #453221
has caused the Debian Bug report #453221,
regarding missinglib: FTBFS: Parse error: [as_patt_opt] expected after [patt]
(in [match_case]
reopen 476054
tags 476054 - unreproducible
thanks
On 14/04/08 at 12:46 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > > dpkg-source -b libfactory++-0.1.4
> > > dpkg-source: info: using source format `1.0'
> > > dpkg-source: info: building libfactory++ using existing
> > > libfactory++_0.1.4.orig.tar.gz
> > >
Package: ruby1.9-dev
Version: 1.9.0.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
intern.h from ruby1.9-dev contains RUBY_EXTERN VALUE rb_argv; but libruby1.9
doesn't define such a symbol. Looking at ruby.c it does #define rb_argv
rb_get_argv(). So probably rb_get_argv sho
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 476054
Bug#476054: libfactory++: FTBFS: dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 476054 - unreproducible
Bug#476054: libfactory++: FTBFS: dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source
Tags were
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:49:27 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#456827: stage: FTBFS: libtool: link:
`/usr/lib/libGL.la' is not a valid libtool archive
has caused the Debian Bug report #456827,
regarding stage: FTBFS: libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libGL.
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:49:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libgtk-canvas has been removed from Debian, closing #456876
has caused the Debian Bug report #456876,
regarding libgtk-canvas: FTBFS: configure: error: *** IMLIB 1.8 not installed -
please inst
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:48:56PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: mplayer
> Version: 1.0~rc2-10
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:48:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libterralib has been removed from Debian, closing #417363
has caused the Debian Bug report #417363,
regarding FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing #includes
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:48:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libterralib has been removed from Debian, closing #453789
has caused the Debian Bug report #453789,
regarding libterralib: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library
libtiff.so.1 nee
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:32:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xbvl has been removed from Debian, closing #439449
has caused the Debian Bug report #439449,
regarding xbvl: FTBFS: *** No rule to make target
`../src_open_gl/xbvl-opengl.a', needed by `xbvl'.
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:31:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libtw0 has been removed from Debian, closing #435515
has caused the Debian Bug report #435515,
regarding uninstallable in unstable: libtw0: Depends: libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0) but
it is not installa
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
#
# ocaml-shout (0.2.5-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Fix FTBFS with new dpkg-dev by setting CFLAGS correctly in debian/rules
#(closes: 476027).
#
package ocaml-shout libshout-ocaml libshout-ocaml-dev
tags 476027 + pending
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
> #
> # ocaml-shout (0.2.5-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Fix FTBFS with new dpkg-dev by setting CFLAGS correctly in debian/rules
> #(closes: 476027).
> #
> package ocaml-sh
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
#
# ocaml-mad (0.3.2-5) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Fix FTBFS with new dpkg-dev by setting CFLAGS correctly in debian/rules
#(closes: 476038).
#
package libmad-ocaml libmad-ocaml-dev ocaml-mad
tags 476038 + pending
--
hi
Read from
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=402950#44
on.
As you see, that piece of code worked in the past, if enough
optimization was allowed. The fact that it does not work anymore is
quite surprising and I would consider this a regression in gcc 4.3
anyhow I will do some c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
> #
> # ocaml-mad (0.3.2-5) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Fix FTBFS with new dpkg-dev by setting CFLAGS correctly in debian/rules
> #(closes: 476038).
> #
> package libmad-oca
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:32:36 +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> > ./configure --host=i486-linux-gnu --build=i486-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr
> > --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man --infodir=\${prefix}/share/info configuring
> > ocaml-shout 0.2.5
> > checking for ocamlc... /usr/bin/ocamlc
> > ocaml version
Hi Mohammed,
* Mohammed Sameer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-13 18:18]:
> I think I'm missing something.
>
> Why do we need to make it not suid if the daemon drops it (-6 upload) ?
Cause it does drop it via seteuid and as long as the buffer
overflow exists possible injected shellcode could do
se
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#476043: fixed in tcludp 1.0.8-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #476043,
regarding tcludp: FTBFS: /bin/sh: -O2: command not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
> #
> # ocaml-portaudio (0.1.1-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Fix FTBFS with new dpkg-dev by setting CFLAGS correctly in
> #debian/rules (closes: 476028).
> #
> package libp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
> #
> # ocaml-ladspa (0.1.0-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Fix FTBFS with new dpkg-dev by setting CFLAGS correctly in
> #debian/rules (closes: 476014).
> #
> package liblads
Hi.
I think (almost) the same patch applies to sympa-5.2.3 too, which is in
Debian stable.
Such fix should be applied to stable too, I guess
(http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-1648)
I have built a proposed patch to apply to stable's package sources
(attached report from "interd
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:31:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #472829,
regarding openbox-session is not a window manager, but a desktop session.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#475923: fixed in console-data 2:1.07-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #475923,
regarding console-data: no template type specified
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
#
# ocaml-ladspa (0.1.0-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Fix FTBFS with new dpkg-dev by setting CFLAGS correctly in
#debian/rules (closes: 476014).
#
package libladspa-ocaml ocaml-ladspa libladspa-ocaml-dev
tags 476014 + pen
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 02:26:47PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi Mohammed,
> * Mohammed Sameer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-13 18:18]:
> > I think I'm missing something.
> >
> > Why do we need to make it not suid if the daemon drops it (-6 upload) ?
>
> Cause it does drop it via seteuid and as lo
Package: gcc-4.3-spu
Version: 4.3.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
spu-gcc cannot produce executables. It also misses the system include
dir:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat spu_hello.c
#include
int main( unsigned long spuid )
{
printf("Hello, World! (From SPU:%d)\n",
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
#
# ocaml-portaudio (0.1.1-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Fix FTBFS with new dpkg-dev by setting CFLAGS correctly in
#debian/rules (closes: 476028).
#
package libportaudio-ocaml libportaudio-ocaml-dev ocaml-portaudio
tags
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#475923: fixed in console-data 2:1.07-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #475923,
regarding console-data: Upgrade failure: no template type specified at
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Template.pm
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#475860: fixed in jd 1:1.9.9~rc080408-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #475860,
regarding jd: not installable because of unsatisfiable dependency
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#475763: fixed in jd 1:1.9.9~rc080408-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #475763,
regarding Log for failed build of jd_1:1.9.9~rc080408-2 (dist=unstable)
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#475923: fixed in console-data 2:1.07-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #475923,
regarding console-data uninstallable when upgrading from 2:1.06-2 to 2:1.07-1
to be marked as done.
This mea
On 14/04/08 at 12:08 +0200, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> Thanks for your report.
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 01:42:06PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Package: rrdtool
> > Version: 1.2.27-1
> > Severity: serious
> > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
> > J
On 14/04/08 at 13:00 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
> * Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-14 12:06]:
> [...]
> > > rm -f debian/changelog.in debian/menu debian/conffiles debian/post*
> > > ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc
> > > checking for a BSD-compatible install... /u
On 14/04/08 at 12:36 +0200, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 01:50:23PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Package: unison
> > Version: 2.13.16-9
> > Severity: serious
> > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
> > Justification: FTBFS on i386
> >
Am Sonntag, den 13.04.2008, 18:15 +0200 schrieb Alessio Gaeta:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sebastian Dröge ha scritto:
>
> > Hm, maybe I found the bug... could you test rebuild gstreamer0.10 with
> > this patch:
> >
> > http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/
On 14/04/08 at 13:09 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
>>> checking for gcc... gcc
>>> checking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler
>>> cannot create executables
>>> See `config.log' for more details.
>>> make: *** [build-stamp] Er
On 14/04/08 at 12:32 +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le Monday 14 April 2008 12:24:28 Lucas Nussbaum, vous avez écrit :
> > This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is
> > now the default on most architectures (even if it's not the case on i386
> > yet). Feel free to do
On 14/04/08 at 13:55 +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:48:56PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Package: mplayer
> > Version: 1.0~rc2-10
> > Severity: serious
> > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
> > Justification: FTBFS on i386
> >
> > Hi,
> >
>
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 04:10:16PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 14/04/08 at 12:36 +0200, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 01:50:23PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Package: unison
> > > Version: 2.13.16-9
> > > Severity: serious
> > > User: [EMAIL PROTECTE
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
#
# ocaml-taglib (0.1.1-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Fix FTBFS with new dpkg-dev by setting CFLAGS correctly in
#debian/rules (closes: 476065).
#
package ocaml-taglib libtaglib-ocaml-dev libtaglib-ocaml
tags 476065 + pen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
> #
> # ocaml-soundtouch (0.1.1-4) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Fix FTBFS with new dpkg-dev by setting CFLAGS correctly in
> #debian/rules (closes: 476068).
> #
> package lib
101 - 200 of 417 matches
Mail list logo
