Bug#470182: dbmail: Does not install, dpkg fails with a status of 1

2008-03-09 Thread Christopher Hotchkiss
Package: dbmail Version: 2.2.9-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Attempting to install this package produces the following output: dbmail:/# apt-get install dbmail Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done dbmail is already the

Bug#470066: Bug#469513: ucf blocks on ocsinventory-agent(1:0.0.8-1) and cacti (0.8.7b-1)

2008-03-09 Thread Niko Tyni
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 04:14:55PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Package: ucf > Version: 3.005 > Severity: important > ucf blocks on ocsinventory-agent(1:0.0.8-1) and cacti (0.8.7b-1) > installation process. Quick solution was to downgrade ucf to version > 2.0020 (stable). This is also #46810

Bug#470183: Depends on atlantik (>= 4:3.5.9) which is unavailable in unstable

2008-03-09 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
Package: atlantikdesigner Version: 4:3.5.9-1 Severity: serious The atlantikdesigner has a dependency on atlantik (>= 4:3.5.9) but there is only 4:3.5.8-1 in unstable. Regards Artur -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Arc

Processed: Re: Processed: merging 400768 and 466643

2008-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 466643 important Bug#466643: please increase number of package names Bug#400768: apt: Returns "E: Wow, you exceeded the number of versions this APT is capable of" Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Pl

Bug#469979: amd64 build of flex 2.5.34-3 defective

2008-03-09 Thread Manoj Srivastava
tags 469979 + moreinfo thanks On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 13:24:00 +0100, Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Package: flex Version: 2.5.34-3 Severity: important > When building wwwoffle 2.9d (which had failed on most buildds due to > the 2.5.34-2 problem; those buildds that succeeded had a diffe

Processed: Re: Bug#469979: amd64 build of flex 2.5.34-3 defective

2008-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 469979 + moreinfo Bug#469979: amd64 build of flex 2.5.34-3 defective There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrato

Bug#469823: marked as done (pound: FTBFS with C compiler cannot create executables)

2008-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 19:02:43 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#469823: fixed in pound 2.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #469823, regarding pound: FTBFS with C compiler cannot create executables to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#469979: severity of 469979 is serious

2008-03-09 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 17:47:25 +0100 (CET), Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16 >> Also seen on the amd64 buildd for apertium. Can a minimum input flex file be generated that demonstrates this issue? >> But there are

Bug#469979: amd64 build of flex 2.5.34-3 defective

2008-03-09 Thread Paul Slootman
On Sun 09 Mar 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > $ flex -i -p -B -F -8 -s -Phtml_yy html.l flex: fatal internal error, > > bad transition character detected in sympartition() > > Could you upload this file to the bug, or, better, a minimal > version that displays this problem? That would

Bug#439527: mod_auth_radius-2.0.c and Apache 2.2.x

2008-03-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 03:36:27AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 06:08:23PM +0200, joy wrote: > > Is the mod_auth_radius-2.0.c supposed to work properly with Apache 2.2.x? > > > > I can compile it just fine, but can't get it to work on runtime. > > > > Maybe, like LDAP, this

Bug#455262: tftp-hpa: diff for NMU version 0.48-1.1

2008-03-09 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 20:09:19 +0200, Jaakko Niemi wrote: > On Sun, 09 Mar 2008, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > tags 455262 + patch > > thanks > > > > Hi, > > > > Attached is the diff for my tftp-hpa 0.48-1.1 NMU uploaded to delayed-3. > > Thanks, > > I'm going to upload new version wit

Bug#470066: Bug#469513: ucf blocks on ocsinventory-agent(1:0.0.8-1) and cacti (0.8.7b-1)

2008-03-09 Thread Manoj Srivastava
clone 469513 -1 reassign -1 cacti retitle -1 Do not call db_stop before calling ucf, since ucf uses debconf reassign 469513 ocsinventory-agent retitle 469513 Do not call db_stop before calling ucf, since ucf uses debconf thanks On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 20:57:52 +0200, Niko Tyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said

Bug#470191: libintl-gettext-ruby1.8: [armel] intl.so installed in wrong directory

2008-03-09 Thread andred
Package: libintl-gettext-ruby1.8 Version: 0.11-10 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable intl.so should be installed into /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/arm-linux-eabi/ so that ruby can find it. Currently it's installed into /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/arm-linux/ This breaks e.g. apt-listbugs: strace a

Bug#469979: severity of 469979 is serious

2008-03-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 02:32:16PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 17:47:25 +0100 (CET), Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > > >> Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16 > >> Also seen on the amd64 buildd for apertium. > > Can a mini

Bug#470194: libuconv-ruby1.8: [armel] uconv.so installed in wrong directory

2008-03-09 Thread andred
Package: libuconv-ruby1.8 Version: 0.4.12-2+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable uconv.so should be installed into /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/arm-linux-eabi/ so that ruby can find it. Currently it's installed into /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/arm-linux/ where ruby won't search fo

Bug#457717: gxine: Segfault on start

2008-03-09 Thread Darren Salt
Could you check gxine 0.5.901-1 (which should shortly be available in unstable for i386) and let me know whether that segfault has gone? -- | Darren Salt| linux or ds at | nr. Ashington, | Toon | RISC OS, Linux | youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army | + Buy less an

Processed: Bug cleanup

2008-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package gxine Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gxine > tag 457717 pending Bug#457717: gxine: Segfault on start There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tag 462101 moreinfo unreproducible Bug#462101: gxine: problem when other windows open in front T

Bug#470202: amanda-server: After upgrading from 2.5.1, amcheck -c fails with "Socket operation on non-socket"

2008-03-09 Thread Raphael Manfredi
Package: amanda-server Version: 1:2.5.2p1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrading from 2.5.1, my "amcheck -c" now fails with: WARNING: paris: selfcheck request failed: error sending REQ: send REQ to paris.ram.loc failed: Socket operation on non-socket I did not

Bug#445726: libjinglebase0.3-0: Parts of libjinglebase is GPLv2 licensed and it links to OpenSSL

2008-03-09 Thread Dafydd Harries
Ar 07/10/2007 am 23:03, ysgrifennodd Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo: > Package: libjinglebase0.3-0 > Version: 0.3.11-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 2.3 > > In the copyright file of libjinglebase, the Affine code is said to be > licensed under the GPL version 2 or later. OpenSSL licen

Bug#456871: fdm: diff for NMU version 1.4-1.1

2008-03-09 Thread Frank Terbeck
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 2008-03-09 16:02:37.00 Frank Terbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] >> The new package is ready and I will ask my mentor to upload it as soon >> as the fixed tdb-dev package hits the mirrors and I can run some >> tests. > > It would be helpful if you coul

Bug#464704: same problem with 0.20.0-1

2008-03-09 Thread eduardo tião
ibrary v3 ii libxml++2.6-2 2.20.0-1 A C++ interface to the GNOME XML l ii libxml2 2.6.31.dfsg-1GNOME XML library subtitleeditor recommends no packages. -- no debconf information reportbug-subtitleeditor-20080309-31314-52_vgl Description: Binary data

Processed: forcibly merging 466624 467271

2008-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 > forcemerge 466624 467271 Bug#466624: libtest-exception-perl: FTBFS: Test failures Bug#467271: libtest-exception-perl: FTBFS with Perl 5.10 (test failures) Forcibly Merged 466624 46

Processed: tagging bugs that are closed by packages in NEW as pending

2008-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW > # > tags 429085 pending Bug#429085: please update/request removal of your package Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > tags 429126 pending Bug#429126: please update/request removal of your package

Bug#468792: xgalaga: diff for NMU version 2.1.0.2-1.1

2008-03-09 Thread tv
tags 468792 + patch thanks Hi, The following is the diff for my xgalaga 2.1.0.2-1.1 NMU. diff -u xgalaga-2.1.0.2/Makefile.in xgalaga-2.1.0.2/Makefile.in --- xgalaga-2.1.0.2/Makefile.in +++ xgalaga-2.1.0.2/Makefile.in @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ for i in levels/*.xgl; do $(INSTALL) $$i $(DESTDIR)$(

Processed: xgalaga: diff for NMU version 2.1.0.2-1.1

2008-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 468792 + patch Bug#468792: xgalaga - FTBFS: chmod: cannot access `/usr/share/man/man6/xgalaga.6x.gz': No such file or directory There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance

Bug#468792: marked as done (xgalaga - FTBFS: chmod: cannot access `/usr/share/man/man6/xgalaga.6x.gz': No such file or directory)

2008-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 19:56:11 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#468792: xgalaga: diff for NMU version 2.1.0.2-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #468792, regarding xgalaga - FTBFS: chmod: cannot access `/usr/share/man/man6/xgalaga.6x.gz': No such f

Bug#429085: marked as done (please update/request removal of your package)

2008-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:57:25 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#429085: fixed in libapache-mod-random 2.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #429085, regarding please update/request removal of your package to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#468792: marked as done (xgalaga - FTBFS: chmod: cannot access `/usr/share/man/man6/xgalaga.6x.gz': No such file or directory)

2008-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:32:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#468792: fixed in xgalaga 2.1.0.2-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #468792, regarding xgalaga - FTBFS: chmod: cannot access `/usr/share/man/man6/xgalaga.6x.gz': No such file or directory

Bug#470218: gitosis: file conflict with python-setuptools

2008-03-09 Thread Chris Knadle
Package: gitosis Version: 0.2+20080118-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable gitosis_0.2+20080219-1 now has a file conflict with python-setuptools, makingit uninstallable. gitosis now depends on python-pkg-resources, which itself suggests python-setuptools. -

Bug#429126: marked as done (please update/request removal of your package)

2008-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:57:19 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#429126: fixed in libapache-mod-layout 5.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #429126, regarding please update/request removal of your package to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#469462: JFYI: #469462 ltsp: X access wide open on LTSP clients

2008-03-09 Thread vagrant
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 08:00:59AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 02:52:01PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Vagrant, since the ldm source package is not present in Etch, does > > this not affect stable at all or has the code been moved between > > packages? > > th

Bug#470234: xcruise: should this package be removed?

2008-03-09 Thread Barry deFreese
Package: xcruise Version: 0.30-8 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Dear Maintainer, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * Package is buggy (Serious bug for 4 years, even if unreproducibl

Bug#470148: marked as done (foomatic-db: openprinting-ppds conflicts against its transitional package linuxprinting.org-ppds)

2008-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Mar 2008 05:17:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#470148: fixed in foomatic-db 20080211-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #470148, regarding foomatic-db: openprinting-ppds conflicts against its transitional package linuxprinting.org-ppds

Bug#470238: [pkg-firebird-general] firebird2.0 super on debian stable using backports

2008-03-09 Thread Damyan Ivanov
Package: firebird2.0-super Version: 2.0.3.12981.ds1-2 Severity: grave -=| marius popa, Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 04:32:42PM +0200 |=- > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -=| marius popa, Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 11:52:58AM +0200 |=- > > > Setting up firebird2.0

Processed: severity of 470234 is important

2008-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 > severity 470234 important Bug#470234: xcruise: should this package be removed? Severity set to `important' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please conta

<    1   2