Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 08:54:16 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line supercollider
has caused the Debian Bug report #458856,
regarding supercollider: FTBFS: exceptions.TypeError: "'NoneType' object is not
callable"
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Confirmed here on Xvfb, amd64, lenny.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: tetex-base
Version: 2007-13
Severity: serious
Hi
>From the description
teTeX is no longer developed upstream, and has been replaced by the TeX
Live collection. This is a transitional package to bring former teTeX
users a decent selection of TeX Live packages. It can be safely rem
Package: gnome-system-tools
Version: 2.20.0-1
Severity: serious
File: /usr/bin/users-admin
users-admin seems totally broken at the moment. It never shows its main
window; instead it prints:
Liboobs-WARNING **: There was an unknown error communicating with the
backends: Cannot do system-bus activa
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418706: fixed in ghostscript 8.62.dfsg.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #418706,
regarding pstoraster crashed on signal 10 (cups)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#469218: fixed in ghostscript 8.62.dfsg.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #469218,
regarding libgs8: Too strict shlibs file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:02:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453160: fixed in debram 1.0.3-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #453160,
regarding debram: FTBFS: utf8.h:15: error: expected declaration specifiers or
'...' before 'size_t'
to be marked
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#462678: fixed in ghostscript 8.62.dfsg.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #462678,
regarding ghostscript: gs no longer supports the x11 output device
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#466237: fixed in xml2rfc 1.33.dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #466237,
regarding xml2rfc: fails to run with tcl8.5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#460692: fixed in ghostscript 8.62.dfsg.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #460692,
regarding ghostscript: ships duplicate /u/s/d/g/README.gz when autobuilt
to be marked as done.
This mean
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 03:40:14AM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Package: xulrunner
> Version: 1.8.1.12-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> Hello,
>
> xulrunner can't be built from source with libnss3-dev=3.12.0~beta2-1
> installed:
>
> nsKeygenHandler.cpp:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
> forwarded 470094 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399589
Bug#470094: xulrunner: FTBFS with libnss3-dev=3.12.0~beta2-1
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded t
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.96+20080228-1
Severity: grave
The upgrade-from-grub-legacy left me with a system that would not boot.
Instead, I got (something like) an invalid device error. When I ran
'set', I saw that root was set to '(fd0)' and prefix to (I think)
'(fd0)/boot/grub'... despite the f
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:41:05AM +, Joseph Nahmias wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 08:07:14PM +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 06:47:53PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 18:36:07 +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> > > > Sorry, this patch do
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.12
> severity 408283 serious
Bug#408283: tcpquota: please use debconf for prompting
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
found 461853 1.52-11
thanks
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of sdd_1.52-11 on debian-31.osdl.marist.edu by sbuild/s390 98
[...]
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/sdd-1.52'
> RULES/rules1.top:234: incs/Dcc.s390x-linux: No such file or directo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 461853 1.52-11
Bug#461853: sdd - FTBFS: make[1]: p: Command not found
Bug marked as found in version 1.52-11 and reopened.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 10:37:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: /usr/bin/users-admin: users-admin does not open
has caused the Debian Bug report #470123,
regarding /usr/bin/users-admin: users-admin does not open
to be marked as done.
This means that you
severity 470118 minor
retitle 470118 tetex-base: misleading description
thanks
Andrew Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>From the description
>
> teTeX is no longer developed upstream, and has been replaced by the TeX
> Live collection. This is a transitional package to bring former teTeX
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 470118 minor
Bug#470118: tetex-base: Transitional package that should depend and/or
recommend tex-foo.
Severity set to `minor' from `serious'
> retitle 470118 tetex-base: misleading description
Bug#470118: tetex-base: Transitional package tha
tags 455262 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my tftp-hpa 0.48-1.1 NMU uploaded to delayed-3.
Greetings
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster
Public key http://zobel.ftbfs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 455262 + patch
Bug#455262: tftpd-ha: Uses undocumented virtual package 'tftpd'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 11:17:42 +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> > +if [ -x /etc/init.d/udev ] && [ -n "$udev_pid" ]; then
> > +if [ "$(stat -c %d/%i /)" = "$(stat -Lc %d/%i /proc/$udev_pid/root
> > 2>/dev/null)" ];
>
> The builtin stat shipped with zsh does not seem to recognize the
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 11:59:43PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> which is serious, since there needs to happen, at least, one more 2.6.24
> upload of l-m-e-2.6 before 2.6.25 in order to get 2.6.24 into testing.
Oh come on Daniel, l-m-e-2.6 never build amd64 packages for
virtualbox-ose so far. So
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 07:45:19PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Starting from 1.5.6-dfsg-1 I cannot compile virtualbox-ose-source
> against my 2.6.24 vanilla anymore. A build log of 1.5.6-dfsg-2 is
> attached.
>From the build log I'd assume you're using m-a to build the module,
right? I use m-a w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.14
> severity 470138 serious
Bug#470138: /usr/share/samba/smb.conf.etch missing
Severity set to `serious' from `minor'
> reassign 470140 samba-common
Bug#470140: samba can not be update
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 470138 pending
Bug#470138: /usr/share/samba/smb.conf.etch missing
Tags were: pending
Bug#470139: upgrade to samba-common 3.0.28-3 impossible, smb.conf.etch
inexistent
Bug#470140: samba can not be update
Bug#470142: samba-common: fails to configure
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 470138 pending
Bug#470138: /usr/share/samba/smb.conf.etch missing
Tags were: pending
Bug#470139: upgrade to samba-common 3.0.28-3 impossible, smb.conf.etch
inexistent
Bug#470140: samba can not be update
Bug#470142: samba-common: fails to configure
Hi Michael,
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 11:53:03AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> From the build log I'd assume you're using m-a to build the module,
> right? I use m-a with a Debian kernel myself and it works flawlessly.
> The build report suggests that some part of your setup thinks it should
> comp
Michael Meskes wrote:
> Oh come on Daniel, l-m-e-2.6 never build amd64 packages for
> virtualbox-ose so far. So how can this suddenly be a reason for marking
> the bug serious?
i've overseen that it's amd64 only, sorry.
> Instead of pointing fingers you should do your due dilligence. Being
> mem
Am Sonntag, den 09.03.2008, 00:20 -0500 schrieb Barry deFreese:
> tags 460302 + patch
> Here is an NMU to resolve this bug. I'm not sure if you will like it
> but it seems to me to be the most straightforward fix.
>
> It also puts the man pages back in. I don't know what happened to them.
> I d
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:02:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#470138: fixed in samba 3.0.28-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #470138,
regarding samba can not be update
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:02:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#470138: fixed in samba 3.0.28-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #470138,
regarding upgrade to samba-common 3.0.28-3 impossible, smb.conf.etch inexistent
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:02:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#470138: fixed in samba 3.0.28-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #470138,
regarding samba-common: fails to configure after upgrade to 3.0.28-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:32:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464317: fixed in mailscanner 4.66.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #464317,
regarding mailscanner: FTBFS: chmod: cannot operate on dangling symlink
`debian/mailscanner/usr/share/MailSca
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:02:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#470138: fixed in samba 3.0.28-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #470138,
regarding /usr/share/samba/smb.conf.etch missing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:32:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#469900: fixed in mlt 0.2.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #469900,
regarding mlt - FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lsfx
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311843: fixed in dpkg 1.15.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #311843,
regarding debsig-verify: Completely breaks installation of standard sarge
packages
to be marked as done.
This means t
Package: foomatic-db
Version: 20080211-1
Severity: serious
foomatic-db provides a transitional package linuxprinting.org-ppds but
depends on openprinting-ppds which conflicts with it.
a) Conflicts of packages with priority: optional must not conflict
with other packages out of optional (amon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have uploaded a updated version 1.3.4-3 to fix this bug.
It closes RC bug #406036, and also closes #419366, #420504, and #436914.
The only one lintian warning is:
"W: gcin: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libgcin-im-client1"
"libgcin-im-client1"
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
tags 470050 confirmed
usertags 470050 - intend-to-nmu
# please do not NMU, go ahead and remove it
usertags 470050 + remove-from-testing
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
> tags 463369 confirmed
Bug#463369: sylpheed-claws: ldap_get_values, ldap_init, ldap_open implicitly
converted to pointers
Tags were: patch
Tags added: confirmed
> usertags 463369 -
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
tags 463369 confirmed
usertags 463369 - intend-to-nmu
# please do not NMU, go ahead and remove it
usertags 463369 + remove-from-testing
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
tags 470052 confirmed
usertags 470052 - intend-to-nmu
# please do not NMU, go ahead and remove it
usertags 470052 + remove-from-testing
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Hi Nikodemus,
"Nikodemus Siivola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not sure what is The Right Thing here, though. Should SBCL (and
> _any_ program that ever sets DF!) save, clear, and restore DF in its
> signal handlers? Should libc/kernel do that? Should signals be blocked
> before ever setting
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
> tags 470052 confirmed
Bug#470052: sylpheed-claws to be removed from testing
Tags were: patch
Tags added: confirmed
> usertags 470052 - intend-to-nmu
Bug#470052: sylpheed-claws to be
Package: fvwm
Version: 1:2.5.24-1
Severity: serious
Manoj,
fvwm and fvwm-gnome have got their dependencies slightly wrong:
a) fvwm-gnome should depend on the right replacement version of fvwm,
which is `fvwm (>= 1:2.5.24), not `fvwm (>= 2.5.24)'.
b) fvwm must not as a package with priority
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
> tags 470050 confirmed
Bug#470050: sylpheed-claws to be removed from testing
Tags were: patch
Tags added: confirmed
> usertags 470050 - intend-to-nmu
Bug#470050: sylpheed-claws to be
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:17:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#470094: fixed in xulrunner 1.8.1.12-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #470094,
regarding xulrunner: FTBFS with libnss3-dev=3.12.0~beta2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:38:06 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#468664: claws-mail: SEGFAULTs causing a kernel Oops
has caused the Debian Bug report #468664,
regarding claws-mail: SEGFAULTs causing a kernel Oops
to be marked as done.
This means that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
> tags 470051 confirmed
Bug#470051: sylpheed-claws to be removed from testing
Tags were: patch
Tags added: confirmed
> usertags 470051 - intend-to-nmu
Bug#470051: sylpheed-claws to be
tags 464285 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my rails 2.0.2-1.1 NMU.
diff -u rails-2.0.2/railties/Rakefile rails-2.0.2/railties/Rakefile
--- rails-2.0.2/railties/Rakefile
+++ rails-2.0.2/railties/Rakefile
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@
end
task :generate_app_doc do
- File.cp "doc/README_FOR_
On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:51:11 -0800, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> The .deb has no Perl in it. Nor SPAM, for that matter.
Confirmed:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/all/libmail-listdetector-perl/filelist
I guess there was some problem due to te repackaged tarball with the
dfsg version; my local .deb h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 464285 + patch
Bug#464285: rails: FTBFS: private method `cp' called for File:Class
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
tags 470051 confirmed
usertags 470051 - intend-to-nmu
# please do not NMU, go ahead and remove it
usertags 470051 + remove-from-testing
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
severity 469882 normal
thanks
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 12:45:14PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> last time i took a more active role, you were even rambling that i shall
> not upload a package. guess what i'm doing since? taking care about the
This was part of the arrangement. It's not that you sh
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 469882 normal
Bug#469882: virtualbox-ose-source: cannot build with 2.6.24 kernel on amd64
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:32:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#470127: fixed in iceweasel 2.0.0.12-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #470127,
regarding xulrunner: FTBFS with libnss3-dev=3.12.0~beta2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:02:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#470129: fixed in iceape 1.1.8-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #470129,
regarding xulrunner: FTBFS with libnss3-dev=3.12.0~beta2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:02:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464285: fixed in rails 2.0.2-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #464285,
regarding rails: FTBFS: private method `cp' called for File:Class
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:30:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#470078: singularity: contains a non-free font
has caused the Debian Bug report #470078,
regarding singularity: contains a non-free font
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439527: fixed in libapache-mod-auth-radius 1.5.7-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #439527,
regarding libapache2-mod-auth-radius works with Apache 2.0, not 2.2
to be marked as done.
This m
tags 456871 + patch
thanks
Hi,
The following is the diff for my fdm 1.4-1.1 NMU.
The fixed tdb-dev has just been uploaded.
Kind regards
T.
diff -u fdm-1.4/debian/control fdm-1.4/debian/control
--- fdm-1.4/debian/control
+++ fdm-1.4/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: mail
Priority: optio
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 456871 + patch
Bug#456871: fdm: FTBFS: /usr/include/tdb.h:150: error: expected ';', ',' or ')'
before '*' token
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tr
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.0
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
>From my build log:
| On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 01:23:02PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Automatic build of dpkg_1.15.0 on maxwell by sbuild/kfreebsd-i386 98
| Build started at 20080309-1
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 02:52:01PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 01:29:35PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > JFYI: http://bugs.debian.org/469462 may need security updates for
> > Etch...
>
> Axel, thanks for bringing this our attention.
>
> Vagrant, since the ldm sourc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> The following is the diff for my fdm 1.4-1.1 NMU.
Okay, but see below
> The fixed tdb-dev has just been uploaded.
I know, I was subscribed to that bug.
> --- fdm-1.4/debian/control
> +++ fdm-1.4/debian/control
[...]
> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), libssl-dev, zlib1g-dev
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:19:55 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: retchmail: FTBFS: unmet dep libwvstreams-dev(inst
4.2.2-2.3 ! >= wanted 4.4)
has caused the Debian Bug report #458706,
regarding retchmail: FTBFS: unmet dep libwvstreams-dev(inst 4.2.2-2.3
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#456871: fixed in fdm 1.4-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #456871,
regarding fdm: FTBFS: /usr/include/tdb.h:150: error: expected ';', ',' or ')'
before '*' token
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#460302: fixed in tdb 1.1.1~svn26294-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #460302,
regarding usr/include/tdb.h uses sig_atomic_t without including signal.h
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:03:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line failure not reproducible in the same conditions
has caused the Debian Bug report #445756,
regarding haskell-arrows: FTBFS: multiple definition of
`arrowszm0zi2zi1_DataziStream_shd_closure'
to be
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:03:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line failure not reproducible in the same conditions
has caused the Debian Bug report #458876,
regarding libopensync-plugin-gpe: b-dep on libopensync1exp2-dev, which is only
in experimental
to be mar
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:03:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line failure not reproducible in the same conditions
has caused the Debian Bug report #460372,
regarding python-imaging: FTBFS: dh_movefiles:
debian/python-imaging-dbg/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 16:35:31 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#453159: capisuite: FTBFS: /usr/include/capi20.h:65:
error: 'size_t' has not been declared
has caused the Debian Bug report #453159,
regarding capisuite: FTBFS: /usr/include/capi20.h:65:
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:03:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line failure not reproducible in the same conditions
has caused the Debian Bug report #460385,
regarding haskell-opengl: FTBFS: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.ln.text'
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:03:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line failure not reproducible in the same conditions
has caused the Debian Bug report #462856,
regarding xfmail - FTBFS: error: 'ldap_init' was not declared in this scope
to be marked as done.
This m
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:03:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line failure not reproducible in the same conditions
has caused the Debian Bug report #460354,
regarding haskell-cabal: FTBFS: Could not find module `Text.PrettyPrint':
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:03:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line failure not reproducible in the same conditions
has caused the Debian Bug report #464277,
regarding xfmail: FTBFS: ldap.cpp:166: error: 'ldap_init' was not declared in
this scope
to be marked as
On 21/02/08 at 22:55 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:23:40PM -0500, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> >>From my pbuilder build log:
>
> >find: cat terminated by signal 13
> >find: cat terminated by signal 13
> >find: cat terminated by signal 13
> >...
> >find: cat terminated by
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:03:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line failure not reproducible in the same conditions
has caused the Debian Bug report #467605,
regarding stringtemplate: FTBFS: The import junit cannot be resolved
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 16:38:31 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#422654: galago-gtk-sharp: diff for NMU version
0.5.0-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #422654,
regarding FTBFS: System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Could not find file
"/usr/lib/pkgcon
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:03:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line failure not reproducible in the same conditions
has caused the Debian Bug report #464291,
regarding mailutils: FTBFS: ERROR: Cannot create
/build/user/mailutils-1.2+dfsg1/imap4d/testsuite/data/s
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:03:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line failure not reproducible in the same conditions
has caused the Debian Bug report #467586,
regarding libmesh: FTBFS: checking for C++ compiler default output file name...
configure: error: C++ co
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:12:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#466883: uw-imap: FTBFS: Finds new copyright statements
has caused the Debian Bug report #466883,
regarding uw-imap: FTBFS: Finds new copyright statements
to be marked as done.
This means
Package: icedove
Version: 2.0.0.9-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
icedove (and iceweasel) crashed. Any of them would start again. I decided to
reboot.
After a reboot, /home filesystem was corrupted. Attached fsck report. fsck
fixed a lot of
bad things that I don't know
On 2008-03-09 16:02:37.00 Frank Terbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
There has been a new upstream release recently, for which I got an
appropriate package which includes exactly the same fix for #456871.
The new package is ready and I will ask my mentor to upload it as
soon
as the fixed tdb-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:00:13PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>On 21/02/08 at 22:55 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> I am working on fixing this, for uw-imap and 30-40 other packages :-)
>No need to. The change in grep was reverted, so your usage i
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
#
# libmail-listdetector-perl (1.01+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * Change the target directory of 'make install' to fix an empty package.
#(Closes: #470111).
#
package libmail-listdetector-perl
tags 470111 + pending
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
> #
> # libmail-listdetector-perl (1.01+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> # * Change the target directory of 'make install' to fix an empty package.
> #(Closes: #470111).
> #
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 10:07:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: FTBFS on sparc: testsuite fails: FAIL: gc.test: gc: Unused
modules are removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #460617,
regarding FTBFS on sparc: testsuite fails: FAIL: gc.test: gc: Unused
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
> severity 469668 serious
Bug#469668: dspam-webfrontend: Error configuring - unable to link into
/usr/share/dspam/templates
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
>
End of message
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#470111: fixed in libmail-listdetector-perl 1.01+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #470111,
regarding libmail-listdetector-perl: package has no Perl in it
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#461774: fixed in amule 2.1.3-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #461774,
regarding amule-daemon 2.1.3-4+b1 upgrade crash in lenny
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> tags 455262 + patch
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> Attached is the diff for my tftp-hpa 0.48-1.1 NMU uploaded to delayed-3.
Thanks,
I'm going to upload new version with few other fixes tomorrow. Same
patch is already included into it. So, if you haven't
tags 469855 + pending
thanks
Hello again,
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 11:17:42AM +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:41:05AM +, Joseph Nahmias wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 08:07:14PM +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> > --- postinst2008-02-08 10:13:24.0 -05
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 469855 + pending
Bug#469855: postinst fails if udev is not running
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 400768 grave
Bug#400768: apt: Returns "E: Wow, you exceeded the number of versions this APT
is capable of"
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> forcemerge 400768 466643
Bug#400768: apt: Returns "E: Wow, you exceeded the number of versio
Hello,
I would like to keep you informed about the status of this bug.
The bad news is that available "support for audacious patch" was written
long time ago for an old version of audacious. So it requires a lot of
changes. I still work on it (dont remove the package from unstable), but
because it
Hi,
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:36:54 +0100, Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> fvwm and fvwm-gnome have got their dependencies slightly wrong:
> a) fvwm-gnome should depend on the right replacement version of fvwm,
> which is `fvwm (>= 1:2.5.24), not `fvwm (>= 2.5.24)'.
This is a
Package: gnunet-server
Version: 0.8.0~pre0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
gnunet-server from experimental fails to install. Looks like you need a
versioned dependency on gnunet-common.
| Automatic build of gnunet-gtk_0.8.0~pre0-1 on lofn by sbuild/hppa 98-farm
| Build started at 20080308-1444
| ***
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
