Bug#468465: FTBFS: make: execvp: ./configure: Permission denied

Package: libgpmg1 Version: 1.20.3~pre3-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: FTBFS Hi ! When building gpm from source, I get: autoconf ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc make: execvp: ./configure: Permission denied Building again solves the problem. Attached a very simple patc

Bug#468202: openoffice.org-writer2latex: still occurring with 0.5-6

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 08:29:49AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > And you unregistered the extension manually to have a clean state if it > > > failed before? Read the buglog... > > > > OK, I removed it (forgot the --shared in the last attempt), and now the > > package

Bug#468476: newsbeuter: segfaults at startup

Package: newsbeuter Version: 0.7-3+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, newsbeuter dies after today's unstable dist-upgrade: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ CHECK_MALLOC_=2 newsbeuter Démarrage newsbeuter 0.7... Chargement de la configuration...fait. Vidage du cache...fait. Char

Processed: Re: Bug#467518: git-core: builds defective package under umask 077

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 467518 + patch Bug#467518: git-core: builds defective package under umask 077 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administ

Bug#467518: git-core: builds defective package under umask 077

tags 467518 + patch quit On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:45:05AM +0100, Florian Zumbiehl wrote: > Well, when starting the build from a umask 077 environment, numerous > files in the resulting package are 0600, which makes it mostly unusable. > > I have not explicitly tested whether this applies to the

Bug#406986: Upgrade B2evolution 0.9.2 to 1.10.2

Hi Emilio, > I would also consider removing it from stable, as I think the security > team cannot support it. The security team for stable often supports versions that are upstream abandoned. The question is whether such a thing is feasible for a package. In this case I see just one open security

Processed: setting package to libgmp-ocaml libgmp-ocaml-dev mlgmp, tagging 464312

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16 > package libgmp-ocaml libgmp-ocaml-dev mlgmp Ignoring bugs not assigned to: mlgmp libgmp-ocaml-dev libgmp-ocaml > tags 464312 + pending Bug#464312: mlgmp: FTBFS: dh_movefiles: debia

Bug#463360: marked as done (proxy-suite: ldap_init, ldap_get_values implicitly converted to pointers)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#463360: fixed in proxy-suite 1.9.2.4-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #463360, regarding proxy-suite: ldap_init, ldap_get_values implicitly converted to pointers to be marked as done. Th

Bug#468487: allows unauthorized remote arbitrary code execution (CVE-2007-5689)

Package: sun-java6 Version: 6-00-2 Severity: critical Tags: security, upstream The sun-java6 version in testing is vulnerable to CVE-2007-5689 : http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-5689 From http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2007-5689 : Overview The Java Virtual Machin

Bug#468482: dlocate uninstallable in unstable

Package: dlocate Version: 0.94 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, dlocate actually depends on findutils (<< 4.2.31-2). [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # apt-cache show dlocate Package: dlocate Priority: optional Section: utils Installed-Size: 88 Maintainer: Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PRO

Bug#468482: dlocate uninstallable in unstable

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:50:19AM +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote: > dlocate actually depends on findutils (<< 4.2.31-2). no, it depends on 'locate | findutils (<< 4.2.31-2)' > [...] > Depends: dctrl-tools | grep-dctrl (>= 0.11), dpkg (>= 1.8.0), locate | > findutils (<< 4.2.31-2), perl > [...] >

Bug#463501: Nokia Award Notification !!!!!!

NOKIA N'SERIES PROMOTION TICKET NO: 1110008342 Ref : NKN/UK 110241/01 Batch: 4-13-7-37-1 We are delighted to inform you of your prize release on the 23rd February, 2008 from the NOKIA 'N' SERIES PROGRAM. Your e-mail was attached to serial number 6028808.Your Email have won the Sum of You hereby ha

Bug#468487: marked as done (allows unauthorized remote arbitrary code execution (CVE-2007-5689))

Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:39:54 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Close has caused the Debian Bug report #468487, regarding allows unauthorized remote arbitrary code execution (CVE-2007-5689) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#468202: openoffice.org-writer2latex: still occurring with 0.5-6

Hi, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 08:29:49AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > > And you unregistered the extension manually to have a clean state if it > > > > failed before? Read the buglog... > > > > > > OK, I removed it (forgot the --shared in the

Bug#468494: Day view in Calendar not working for users, only for groups

Package: egroupware-infolog Version: 1.2.107-2.dfsg-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch --- Please enter the report below this line. --- After upgrading to egroupware version 1.2.107, the day view in the calendar does not work for single users anymore, only for groups. Week and month views still work

Bug#468476: newsbeuter: segfaults at startup

tags 468476 + confirmed thanks Hi Xavier, * Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-29 12:33]: > Package: newsbeuter > Version: 0.7-3+b1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > newsbeuter dies after today's unstable dist-upgrade: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ CHECK_MALLOC_

Processed: Re: Bug#468476: newsbeuter: segfaults at startup

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 468476 + confirmed Bug#468476: newsbeuter: segfaults at startup There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, D

Bug#468482: marked as done (dlocate uninstallable in unstable)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:44:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#468482: dlocate uninstallable in unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #468482, regarding dlocate uninstallable in unstable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#468202: openoffice.org-writer2latex: still occurring with 0.5-6

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:24:36PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 08:29:49AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > > > And you unregistered the extension manually to have a clean state if > > > > > it > > > > > failed befor

Processed: Remove xmms-liveice

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456708 normal Bug#456708: xmms-liveice: Should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456708 ftp.debian.org Bug#456708: xmms-liveice: Should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `xmms-liveic

Processed: xmms-speex removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456717 normal Bug#456717: xmms-speex: Should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456717 ftp.debian.org Bug#456717: xmms-speex: Should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `xmms-speex' to

Processed: xmms-skins removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 461740 normal Bug#461740: xmms-skins: xmms is going away Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 461740 ftp.debian.org Bug#461740: xmms-skins: xmms is going away Bug reassigned from package `xmms-skins' to `ftp.debian.org'. > retit

Processed: xmms-rplay removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456753 normal Bug#456753: xmms-rplay: should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456753 ftp.debian.org Bug#456753: xmms-rplay: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `xmms-rplay' to

Processed: qbble removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456693 normal Bug#456693: qbble: Should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456693 ftp.debian.org Bug#456693: qbble: Should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `qbble' to `ftp.debian.org

Bug#468562: Does not include google-cal-helper

Package: opensync-plugin-google-calendar Version: 0.22-1 Severity: grave --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Attempting to use package, sync dies with: $ msynctool --sync test3 Synchronizing group "test3" Member 1 of type google-calendar just connected Member 2 of type kdepim-sync j

Bug#468476: marked as done (newsbeuter: segfaults at startup)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#468476: fixed in newsbeuter 0.7-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #468476, regarding newsbeuter: segfaults at startup to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Processed: xmms-musepack removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456712 normal Bug#456712: xmms-musepack: Should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456712 ftp.debian.org Bug#456712: xmms-musepack: Should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `xmms-muse

Processed: xmms-wmdiscotux removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456757 normal Bug#456757: xmms-wmdiscotux: should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456757 ftp.debian.org Bug#456757: xmms-wmdiscotux: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `xmms-

Processed: xmms-infopipe removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456704 normal Bug#456704: xmms-infopipe: Should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456704 ftp.debian.org Bug#456704: xmms-infopipe: Should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `xmms-info

Processed: xmms-shell removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456729 normal Bug#456729: xmms-shell: Please move to use bmpx Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456729 ftp.debian.org Bug#456729: xmms-shell: Please move to use bmpx Bug reassigned from package `xmms-shell' to `ftp.debian.org'

Processed: xmms-scrobbler removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456754 normal Bug#456754: xmms-scrobbler: should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456754 ftp.debian.org Bug#456754: xmms-scrobbler: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `xmms-sc

Processed: xmms-fmradio removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456700 normal Bug#456700: xmms-fmradio: Should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456700 ftp.debian.org Bug#456700: xmms-fmradio: Should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `xmms-fmradi

Bug#431745: marked as done (opensync-plugin-google-calendar: Fails to sync with google calendar with DateTime exception)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:02:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#431745: fixed in libopensync-plugin-google-calendar 0.22-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #431745, regarding opensync-plugin-google-calendar: Fails to sync with google calendar with DateT

Processed: xmms-blursk removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456746 normal Bug#456746: xmms-blursk: should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456746 ftp.debian.org Bug#456746: xmms-blursk: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `xmms-blursk'

Bug#444375: marked as done (Broken on amd64 environment)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:02:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#444375: fixed in libunicode-japanese-perl 0.45-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #444375, regarding Broken on amd64 environment to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#464530: marked as done (libghc6-ftphs-dev: postinst failure (regex-compat-0.71.0.1 not found))

Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#464530: fixed in ftphs 1.0.4.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #464530, regarding libghc6-ftphs-dev: postinst failure (regex-compat-0.71.0.1 not found) to be marked as done. This means tha

Processed: xmms-ladspa removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456752 normal Bug#456752: xmms-ladspa: should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456752 ftp.debian.org Bug#456752: xmms-ladspa: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `xmms-ladspa'

Processed: lirc-xmms-plugin removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456691 normal Bug#456691: lirc-xmms-plugin: Should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456691 ftp.debian.org Bug#456691: lirc-xmms-plugin: Should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `lir

Processed: xmms-kde removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456707 normal Bug#456707: xmms-kde: Should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456707 ftp.debian.org Bug#456707: xmms-kde: Should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `xmms-kde' to `ftp.d

Processed: xmms-msa removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456711 normal Bug#456711: xmms-msa: Should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456711 ftp.debian.org Bug#456711: xmms-msa: Should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `xmms-msa' to `ftp.d

Bug#468562: marked as done (Does not include google-cal-helper)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:32:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#468562: fixed in libopensync-plugin-google-calendar 0.22-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #468562, regarding Does not include google-cal-helper to be marked as done. This means that you c

Processed: modplugxmms removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456731 normal Bug#456731: modplugxmms: Please switch to an XMMS alternative Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456731 ftp.debian.org Bug#456731: modplugxmms: Please switch to an XMMS alternative Bug reassigned from package `mod

Processed: xmms-mpg123-ja removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456710 normal Bug#456710: xmms-mpg123-ja: Should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456710 ftp.debian.org Bug#456710: xmms-mpg123-ja: Should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `xmms-mp

Processed: xmms-mad removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456709 normal Bug#456709: xmms-mad: Should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456709 ftp.debian.org Bug#456709: xmms-mad: Should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `xmms-mad' to `ftp.d

Processed: xmms-goodnight removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456701 normal Bug#456701: xmms is going away Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456701 ftp.debian.org Bug#456701: xmms is going away Bug reassigned from package `xmms-goodnight' to `ftp.debian.org'. > retitle 456701 RM: xmms-g

Processed: gkrellmms removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456684 normal Bug#456684: gkrellmms: Should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456684 ftp.debian.org Bug#456684: gkrellmms: Should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `gkrellmms' to `ft

Processed: gdancer removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456681 normal Bug#456681: gdancer: Should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456681 ftp.debian.org Bug#456681: gdancer: Should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `gdancer' to `ftp.debi

Processed: libxmms-perl removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456689 normal Bug#456689: libxmms-perl: Should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456689 ftp.debian.org Bug#456689: libxmms-perl: Should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `libxmms-per

Processed: libxmms-ruby removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456690 normal Bug#456690: libxmms-ruby: Should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456690 ftp.debian.org Bug#456690: libxmms-ruby: Should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `libxmms-rub

Processed: pyxmms removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456692 normal Bug#456692: pyxmms: Should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 456692 ftp.debian.org Bug#456692: pyxmms: Should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `pyxmms' to `ftp.debian.

Bug#464096: poster: easy fix for KDE

Hi Jim, see this bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=379378 cheers, Daniel -- - Daniel Hermann, Institut fuer Theoretische Festkoerperphysik Universitaet Karlsruhe Tel: ++49 (0)721 608-7328

Bug#468644: fvwm-crystal: should this package be orphaned or removed?

Package: fvwm-crystal Version: 3.0.3.dfsg1-0.1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Dear Maintainer, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for orphan or removal from Debian, because: * buggy. * Maintainer appears inactive. La

Bug#468642: runit: fails to install/upgrade

Package: runit Version: 1.8.0-4 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Upgrading from runit 1.8.0-2 to 1.8.0-4 fails. It seems to restart user processes, including the one that is doing the upgrade. The first time it kicked me out of X. It leaves dpkg/apt in an unusable and

Bug#468643: gnump3d: should this package be removed?

Package: gnump3d Version: 3.0-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Dear Maintainer, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * buggy. * no maintainer. * Upstream has stopped development. * Ple

Bug#406986: Upgrade B2evolution 0.9.2 to 1.10.2

"Thijs Kinkhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Emilio, > >> I would also consider removing it from stable, as I think the security >> team cannot support it. > > The security team for stable often supports versions that are upstream > abandoned. The question is whether such a thing is feasible

Bug#462701: 462701: grub: savedefault menu.lst option results in unbootable system

I saw the note about this in the changelog, but can't find many other signs of it. My menu.lst doesn't have a savedefault variable (the changelog says it exists), perhaps because that only appears in newly generated ones? And I don't see an indication in README.Debian.gz or NEWS.Debian.gz about w

Bug#404001: file conflict between perftools0_tau and libgoogle

Tags: + patch Hello Daigo, My package pound depends on libgoogle-perftools0. For entering lenny it is necessary that you fix this bug. Attached are the suggested changed/new files: - debian/libgoogle-perftools0.docs - debian/README.Debian - debian/rules -- Kind Regards, Michael Mende http://

Bug#468202: openoffice.org-writer2latex: still occurring with 0.5-6

Hi, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > Thanks. The manual says that if the old prerm fails, dpkg should try the > same operation with the new prerm, which you said is fixed. I didn't see > it try to do this. The problem here might be that the prerm didn't actually fail in the sense that it returned an exitc

Bug#404001: file conflict between perftools0_tau and libgoogle

Sorry, one changed file was forgotten: - debian/libgoogle-perftools0.manpages On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 08:02:23PM +0100, Michael Mende wrote: > Tags: + patch > > Hello Daigo, > > My package pound depends on libgoogle-perftools0. For entering lenny it > is necessary that you fix this bug. > > Att

Bug#468431: marked as done (depends on gnustep-core which you dropped)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#468431: fixed in meta-gnustep 7.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #468431, regarding depends on gnustep-core which you dropped to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Processed: Re: libghc6-missingh-dev: Fails to install.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 464013 1.0.0.1 Bug#464013: libghc6-missingh-dev: Fails to install. Bug marked as found in version 1.0.0.1 and reopened. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admin

Bug#464013: libghc6-missingh-dev: Fails to install.

found 464013 1.0.0.1 thanks On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 06:53:34PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Package: libghc6-missingh-dev > Version: 1.0.0.0 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > Your package is failing to install with the following error: > Setting up libghc6-missingh-dev (1.0.0.0) ... > Reading packa

Processed: Re: file conflicts between libgoogle-perftools0 and tau

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 404001 + patch Bug#404001: file conflict between perftools0_tau and libgoogle There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thankyou Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admi

Bug#406986: Upgrade B2evolution 0.9.2 to 1.10.2

Hi, Emilio wrote: > In fact, I guess the package should be orphaned and removed from Debian > if a new maintainer doesn't step up, as Xavier Luthi (the original > maintainer) is not around (I didn't see him in mentors either). While I agree that the package is in a pretty bad shape, I think com

Bug#468087: [slime-devel] Re: Debian unstable version broken

Hello! On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:47:33 +0100, Helmut Eller wrote: > * Liam Healy [2008-02-27 23:26+0100] writes: > >> Before I file a bug report with Debian I thought I'd ask here to see >> if anybody knew about this, if there is a workaround etc. Liam: please, either directly report it to Debian fi

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 465733 important Bug#465733: xfsprogs: xfs_check SEGV Severity set to `important' from `critical' > tags 465733 upstream Bug#465733: xfsprogs: xfs_check SEGV There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > tags 303388 upstream Bug#303388: xfs_

Bug#468429: slime: Error on startup

forcemerge 468087 468429 thanks Hello! On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:54:56 +0100, Liam Healy wrote: > I have found that the latest version of slime will not start up. I > posted to the slime mailing list and got this response from Helmut > Eller: Liam, as I already suggested you at [1], before submitt

Bug#465733: Updating bug status

Hi, Just a quick note to say I'll be downgrading the severity on this bug - as per the previous email on the bug, xfs_repair can fix the FS damage. In the long run, theres also discussion (upstream) of replacing xfs_check entirely by an "xfs_repair -n" wrapper, which would resolve this issue enti

Bug#468664: claws-mail: SEGFAULTs causing a kernel Oops

Package: claws-mail Version: 3.3.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, today, suddenly [1], claws-mail started hanging, outputting a strange message on the console: ---8<--- Feb 29 21:15:54 pingu kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual ad

Bug#468184: marked as done (installation-reports)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:18:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#468184: fixed in xfsprogs 2.9.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #468184, regarding installation-reports to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#465737: marked as done (Can't mount XFS partition on "/")

Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:18:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#465737: fixed in xfsprogs 2.9.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #465737, regarding Can't mount XFS partition on "/" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#465737: marked as done (Can't mount XFS partition on "/")

Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:18:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#468184: fixed in xfsprogs 2.9.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #468184, regarding Can't mount XFS partition on "/" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#468184: marked as done (installation-reports)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:18:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#465737: fixed in xfsprogs 2.9.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #465737, regarding installation-reports to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#468673: libmlt-data: fails to replace files from libmlt0.2.4

Package: libmlt-data Version: 0.2.4-1 Severity: serious Unpacking libmlt-data (from .../libmlt-data_0.2.4-1_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libmlt-data_0.2.4-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/mlt/profiles/svcd_ntsc_wide', which is also in package

Bug#468664: claws-mail: SEGFAULTs causing a kernel Oops

This happens also with a fresh configuration (still with 3.3.1). I'll try to reproduce with other versions. (I know my kernel is tainted -- see that "G" in the message I pasted before -- but I currently don't have any non-free module loaded. I'll investigate if this tainting might cause the Oops)

Bug#464013: libghc6-missingh-dev: Fails to install.

On Fri February 29 2008 1:59:34 pm Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > I want to repeat that request. Atleast make sure that packages end up > in such a state that they can be removed. > > > Kurt I have forwarded this, and an explanation, to the debian-haskell list so we can discuss that and see if we can

Bug#468404: iodine_0.4.1-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: test failure

On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:12:02 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > Do you happen to have any idea what's going on here? AFAICS it's > > something hppa specific ... > No specific idea, no. If you want to debug this I can offer you SSH > access to my HPPA machine. Thanks for the offer, I'll contact y

Processed: submitter 468184

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16 > submitter 468184 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#468184: installation-reports Changed Bug submitter from Magnus Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (By the way, that Bug is currently

Bug#465036: marked as done (ski: FTBFS: checking for pkg-config... no)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#465036: fixed in ski 1.3.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #465036, regarding ski: FTBFS: checking for pkg-config... no to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#468676: marked as done (FTBFS on arm, (armel) ,mips, mipsel)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:40:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#468676: FTBFS on arm, (armel) ,mips, mipsel has caused the Debian Bug report #468676, regarding FTBFS on arm, (armel) ,mips, mipsel to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#468676: FTBFS on arm, (armel) ,mips, mipsel

Package: kdesvn Version: 0.14.2-2 Severity: serious -snip- [ 67%] Building CXX object src/svnfrontend/CMakeFiles/svnfrontend.dir/editpropsdlg.o /build/buildd/kdesvn-0.14.2/obj-arm-linux-gnu/src/svnfrontend/editpropsdlg.cpp:123:42: warning: no newline at end of file /build/buildd/kdesvn-0.14.2/obj-

Bug#407761: Pressing return while configuring does not accept defaults

tags 407761 + patch thanks Hi, Here is an NMU to fix this bug as well as update the build depends for postgresql-dev. Thanks, Barry deFreese diff -Nru dak-1.0/debian/changelog dak-1.0/debian/changelog --- dak-1.0/debian/changelog 2007-01-21 23:54:55.0 -0500 +++ dak-1.0/debian/changelo

Processed: Re: Pressing return while configuring does not accept defaults

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 407761 + patch Bug#407761: Pressing return while configuring does not accept defaults There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: pyxmms-remote removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 461974 normal Bug#461974: pyxmms: Should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 461974 ftp.debian.org Bug#461974: pyxmms: Should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `pyxmms-remote' to `ftp.

Bug#468202: openoffice.org-writer2latex: still occurring with 0.5-6

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 08:00:58PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > Thanks. The manual says that if the old prerm fails, dpkg should try the > > same operation with the new prerm, which you said is fixed. I didn't see > > it try to do this. > > The problem here mig

Bug#450455: marked as done (gengameng: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat `/build/user/gengameng-4.1/debian/tmp/usr/include/gengameng/*.h': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Sat, 1 Mar 2008 12:43:42 +1300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gengameng removed from the archive has caused the Debian Bug report #450455, regarding gengameng: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat `/build/user/gengameng-4.1/debian/tmp/usr/include/gengameng/*.h': No such

Bug#468664: claws-mail: SEGFAULTs causing a kernel Oops

tags 468664 unreproducible thanks On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:55:00 +0100 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This happens also with a fresh configuration (still with 3.3.1). > > I'll try to reproduce with other versions. > > (I know my kernel is tainted -- see that "G" in the message I paste

Processed: Re: Bug#468664: claws-mail: SEGFAULTs causing a kernel Oops

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 468664 unreproducible Bug#468664: claws-mail: SEGFAULTs causing a kernel Oops There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrato

Bug#464665: marked as done (undefined references on arm)

Your message dated Sat, 01 Mar 2008 01:47:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#464665: fixed in maloc 0.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #464665, regarding undefined references on arm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: reassign 468676 to libqt3-mt-dev

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 > reassign 468676 libqt3-mt-dev Bug#468676: FTBFS on arm, (armel) ,mips, mipsel Bug reassigned from package `kdesvn' to `libqt3-mt-dev'. > End of message, stopping processing here.

Processed: reopening 468676

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 > reopen 468676 Bug#468676: FTBFS on arm, (armel) ,mips, mipsel Bug reopened, originator not changed. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assi

Processed: found 468676 in 3:3.3.8b-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 > found 468676 3:3.3.8b-1 Bug#468676: FTBFS on arm, (armel) ,mips, mipsel Bug marked as found in version 3:3.3.8b-1. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me i

Bug#466796: has no business starting a server by default; existing implementation massively insecure; debconf used incorrectly and throws away passwords

On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > See e.g. http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling > > > > So, based on this, I have prepared a packages which does the > > needful. P

Processed: severity of 468643 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16 > severity 468643 important Bug#468643: gnump3d: should this package be removed? Severity set to `important' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Processed: severity of 468644 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16 > severity 468644 important Bug#468644: fvwm-crystal: should this package be orphaned or removed? Severity set to `important' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here

Bug#468494: Day view in Calendar not working for users, only for groups

Hi Stefan, thanks for the bug report. The bug (and other ones related to newer postgres versions) are fixed in the current release 1.4. The old version 1.2 is no longer supported by the egroupware project. Committing the fix is of cause easy, thought there would be no new 1.2 release, as 1.2 als

Bug#468751: aptitude update fails with improperly formed Recommends entry in lists files

Package: aptitude Version: 0.4.10-1+b2 Severity: critical Justification: root security hole Tags: security When a Recommends line in the package lists files does not have any packages recommended, aptitude will not update the package lists. For instance, # aptitude update # vi # aptitude updat