tavs 467591 + unreproducible
thanks
Umh... When rebuilding this package, the build failed to fail - It
succeeded :)
Greetings,
--
Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 448890 important
Bug#448890: bioperl recommends packages not in main
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
severity 448890 important
thanks
This is a release goal.
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (03/11/2007):
> Of course, packaging all the missing CPAN modules before the release
> in on our agenda.
Any update on this?
--
Cyril Brulebois
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#467591: fixed in libnet-rawip-perl 0.23-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #467591,
regarding libnet-rawip-perl: FTBFS: Failed 1/8 test scripts, 87.50% okay. 1/64
subtests failed, 98.44% ok
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 448890 serious
Bug#448890: bioperl recommends packages not in main
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
tag 464265 patch pending
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (06/02/2008):
> Package: clips-doc
> version: 6.24-1
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080205 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
Please find attached a diff for my NMU, to be uploaded to DEL
On 29/02/2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Sorry for the severity ping-pong, but we do not want the package in
> testing yet. Do not hesitate to correct me if I use the wrong way to
> prevent the migration.
That's fine to use an RC bug to prevent the migration, as long as you
document it. One can't gu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 437297 important
Bug#437297: bmpx: Images licensed under CreativeCommons included in the package
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 464265 patch pending
Bug#464265: clips-doc: FTBFS: dpkg-checkbuilddeps: error: syntax error in
debian/control at line 11: duplicate field Recommends found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pleas
I believe the right solution is to set the default in the kernel, not in
mkfs, it should be possible to change lazy-sb to no-lazy-sb and only
flag when we actually want to disable it.
FS mounted with lazy-sb, should be (if unmounted cleanly) mountable by a
non-lazy-aware kernel, (and if not unmou
tag 464279 patch pending
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (06/02/2008):
> Package: childsplay
> version: 0.85.1-1
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080205 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
please find attached the diff for my NMU, to be uploa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 464279 patch pending
Bug#464279: childsplay: FTBFS: make: *** [binary-install/childsplay] Error 1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 464264 patch
Bug#464264: fortunes-es: FTBFS: dpkg-checkbuilddeps: error: syntax error in
debian/control at line 21: duplicate field Depends found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
tag 464264 patch
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (06/02/2008):
> Package: fortunes-es
> version: 1.27
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080205 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
please find attached a patch for this bug. I don't plan to NMU t
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 03:24:19AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> And you unregistered the extension manually to have a clean state if it
> failed before? Read the buglog...
How?
[ 5:09PM] [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ sudo /usr/lib/openoffice/program/unopkg list
--shared
all deployed shared packages:
Ide
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
I now have to possible sponsors, but both are very busy so any other
solutions is appreciated.
The package is more(as far as I know) or less(you have any input?) ready
at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/caudium/
//Henrik Andreasson
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 03:24:19AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > [10:20AM] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:oboe/apps/callexec $ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
> > Reading package lists... Done
> > Building dependency tree
> > Reading state information... Done
> > Calculating
New Features:
http://kellyherreatc.blogspot.com
System Requirements
• Intel® Pentium® 4 processor, 2.2 GHz Recommended
• Microsoft® Windows Vista™, Windows® XP Home and Professional (SP2), Windows®
2000 (SP4)
• 512 MB RAM
• 1500 MB free disk space for installation
• 1024x768 VGA with True Colo
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:27:57PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> tavs 467591 + unreproducible
> thanks
>
> Umh... When rebuilding this package, the build failed to fail - It
> succeeded :)
I think it happens when the IP address (or one of them?) of the build
host is unresolvable. I saw it too with
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
Progress has been made (thanks David !), but there are still a few CPAN
modules to package. We definitely want this before the freeze.
If there is any lack of man power I would issue a Request For Help
on debian-perl (CCed to Debian-Med in this specif
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 07:14:52AM +0100, Henrik Andreasson wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
>
> I now have to possible sponsors, but both are very busy so any other
> solutions is appreciated.
>
> The package is more(as far as I know) or less(you have any input?) ready
> at:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 468202 0.5-6
Bug#468202: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 0.5-6, send any further explanations to Steffen
Moel
101 - 122 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
