Processed: Re: Bug#458449: Starting of x.org fails with "PreInitDAL failed"

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 458449 important Bug#458449: Starting of x.org fails with "PreInitDAL failed" Severity set to `important' from `critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (

Bug#458449: Starting of x.org fails with "PreInitDAL failed"

2008-01-01 Thread Romain Beauxis
severity 458449 important thanks Le Monday 31 December 2007 14:57:54 Georgi Naplatanov, vous avez écrit : > Package: fglrx-driver > Version: 8.44.3-1 > Severity: critical Not for everyone... > After installation of fglrx-driver 8.44.3-1, x.org did not start. It would be nice if you could add h

Processed: Fix versions of #458481

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > notfound 458481 57+dfsg-2 Bug#458481: kvm: Doesn't boot anymore, when using 58+dfsg-1 (but does with 57+dfsg-2) Bug no longer marked as found in version 57+dfsg-2. > found 458481 58+dfsg-1 Bug#458481: kvm: Doesn't boot anymore, when using 58+dfsg-1 (b

Bug#454640: Debian doesn't see blankt discs

2008-01-01 Thread Onur Aslan
This problem doesn't belong to brasero. My Debian doesn't see any blank disc. I tried Gnome baker, nautilus and brasero. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#458516: lirc-modules-source: cannot build lirc_dev on 2.6.23-1

2008-01-01 Thread Richard Antony Burton
Package: lirc-modules-source Version: 0.8.0-13 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable This is probably a duplicate of 457858, but since there are no real details given I don't want to hijack it. Please merge mine with it if you want to. lirc_dev does not compile, at l

Bug#458522: flashplugin-nonfree: version in oldstable has security bugs

2008-01-01 Thread Bart Martens
Package: flashplugin-nonfree Severity: grave Tags: wontfix, security, help I'm tagging this bug "wontfix" to express that I don't intend to spend time on this old version of flashplugin-nonfree written in Ruby in "oldstable". As said before on bugs 433687 and 402822, NMU welcome. --- Begin Mess

Bug#457291: flashplugin-nonfree: decision 2007-12-21: keep this package out of stable starting with lenny

2008-01-01 Thread Bart Martens
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 14:16 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Can you please elucidate on why Lenny will not have this package? Yes: Most newer versions of the Adobe Flash Player are a combination of new features and fixes for security bugs. The Debian Security Team does not support "contrib" an

Bug#457291: what's going on with Adobe Flash player in Lenny?

2008-01-01 Thread Bart Martens
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 16:08 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > we plan to have flashplugin-nonfree available for debian stable users. Either > via volatile or via backports.org. Not via volatile. http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2007/12/msg00179.html Yes, I intend to maintain a package

Bug#457291: flashplugin-nonfree in testing

2008-01-01 Thread Bart Martens
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 16:33 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What about for Debian Testing users? as far as I understand there isn't an > equivalent in Testing of backports.org or volatile. I intend to maintain the package in unstable in a way that it is compatible with testing without delay. So

Bug#458526: warzone2100: FTBFS: /bin/sh: zip: command not found

2008-01-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: warzone2100 Version: 2.1.0~0.svn3260-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: cd aivolution && zip -ru0 ../aivolution.wz multiplay commands.txt installation.txt -x *svn* /bin/sh: zip: command not found make[5]: *** [aivolution.wz] Error 127 Ku

Processed: iceweasel hangs after start with backtrace

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 457416 normal Bug#457416: iceweasel hangs after start with backtrace Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#458532: Clamav vulnerable to symlink attack

2008-01-01 Thread Neil McGovern
Package: clamav Version: 0.90.1-3etch7 Severity: critical Tags: security Two new CVEs for clamav: Name: CVE-2007-6595 Status: Candidate URL: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-6595 Reference: BUGTRAQ:20071229 TK53 Advisory #2: Multiple vulnerabilities in ClamAV Reference: UR

Bug#457416: iceweasel hangs after start with backtrace

2008-01-01 Thread Stefan Fritsch
severity 457416 normal thanks Not starting when a config file is corrupted is not a grave bug. Downgrading to allow testing migration. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Patch to fix the FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps RC bug

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 456867 patch Bug#456867: gnat-4.2: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library libgnat-4.2.so.1 needed by debian/libgnatprj4.2/usr/lib/libgnatprj.so.4.2 (its RPATH is ''). There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping pro

Bug#446795: marked as done (On new sid/lenny systems there is no /etc/timezone - rootstrap fails)

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Jan 2008 14:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#446795: fixed in rootstrap 0.3.24-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#446729: marked as done (rootstrap: MAKEDEV: No such file or directory)

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Jan 2008 14:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#446729: fixed in rootstrap 0.3.24-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#454809: Bug#339776: imagemagick: new upstream release available (6.2.5-4, 2005.10.31)

2008-01-01 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Nelson, I see that you tagged this bug "pending" in November, but that there hasn't been an upload since then. Are you still planning to upload a new package? I maintain the ruby bindings for imagemagick, and their new version requires imagemagick >= 6.3. Something else: I see that you are no

Processed: your mail

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 456892 pending Bug#456892: python-scipy: FTBFS: Error: Unable to find 'suitesparse/umfpack.h' Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrat

Bug#456867: Patch to fix the FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps RC bug

2008-01-01 Thread Anibal Avelar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tags 456867 patch thanks I added one patch to fix this RC bug: gnat-4.2: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library libgnat-4.2.so.1 needed by debian/libgnatprj4.2/usr/lib/libgnatprj.so.4.2 (its RPATH is ''). The problem was related to mi

Bug#458450: marked as done (libaqbanking-data: needs to conflict with libaqbanking16)

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Jan 2008 15:02:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#458450: fixed in libaqbanking 3.0.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#458450: libaqbanking-data: needs to conflict with libaqbanking16

2008-01-01 Thread Micha Lenk
Hi Andreas, Andreas Pakulat wrote: >> Does your AqBanking 2.x work now again? > > yes. Good. I just uploaded a fixed package. >> If yes I'll try to do these steps on libaqbanking-data's postinst script >> on installation. > > I would think that dpkg first removes the files and dirs associated

Bug#458532: Clamav vulnerable to symlink attack

2008-01-01 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Neil, * Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-01 15:26]: [...] > I'd say ignore CVE-2007-6596, as clamav also doesn't recognise > insert-random-proprietary-encoding-here either, so it's not really a > valid issue (imo). Isn't the problem with this that mailers exist that treat such conte

Bug#449353: bibletime: should this package be orphaned?

2008-01-01 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
severity 449353 normal reassign 449353 wnpp retitle 449353 O: bibletime -- A bible study tool for KDE thanks On 05/11/07 at 12:16 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that > should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: > > * 2 RC

Processed: Re: Bug#449353: bibletime: should this package be orphaned?

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 449353 normal Bug#449353: bibletime: should this package be orphaned? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 449353 wnpp Bug#449353: bibletime: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `bibletime' to `wnpp'. >

Bug#449356: elfsh: should this package be orphaned?

2008-01-01 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 12/12/07 at 15:26 -0500, Andrés Roldán wrote: > > Hi, > > > > While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that > > should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: > > > > * 4 RC bugs with no recent activity > Please don't orphan this package as I am now packaging Ere

Bug#449355: llvm: should this package be removed?

2008-01-01 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 15/11/07 at 08:44 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05/11/2007): > > If you think that it should be orphaned instead of being removed from > > Debian, please reply to this bug and tell so. > > Just to keep you posted, there are some ongoing discussions on the l

Bug#458542: /usr/bin/azureus: line 10: exec: java: not found

2008-01-01 Thread Thue Janus Kristensen
Package: azureus Version: 3.0.3.4-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 I just installed azureus. It does not work, looks like a missing dependency. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~> azureus /usr/bin/azureus: line 10: exec: java: not found [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~> which java java not found Regards, Thue

Bug#458447: dovecot-imapd: Can't connect to dovecot since 1.0.9 (from 1.0.5)

2008-01-01 Thread Victor NOEL
Happy new year, I am sorry, in fact it was my error, I was using a plugin I compiled myself and there was a problem with it, it caused this error and I couldn't find anything in the log (but there should be a place if I look carefully where there is an error :) Sorry again for this and thanks you

Bug#379388: License of pgapack

2008-01-01 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 05/11/07 at 17:24 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 5 November 2007 at 19:25, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > | Hi Dirk, > | > | Has there been any progress on this since your phone call? > > Very much so -- full agreement in principle by all parties to release under > the MPICH2 license (which

Bug#458551: nunit: should this package be orphaned?

2008-01-01 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: nunit Version: 2.2.8-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * Severely outdated. According to http://www.nunit.com/index.php?

Bug#458554: muine: should this package be orphaned?

2008-01-01 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: muine Version: 0.8.7-1.1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * Several RC bugs opened for a long time with no action from the

Bug#458553: ninpaths: should this package be removed?

2008-01-01 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: ninpaths Version: 3.1.1-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * Last upload in 2002. * Very low popcon (2 insts). * Several bugs. If you

Bug#458552: lpc-mode: should this package be removed?

2008-01-01 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: lpc-mode Version: 0.15-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * very low popcon (10 insts). * no upload since 2002. * doesn't work with em

Processed: severity of 458553 is normal, reassign 458553 to ftp.debian.org ...

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > severity 458553 normal Bug#458553: ninpaths: should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 458553 ftp.debian.org Bug#458553: ninpaths: should th

Bug#456868: marked as done (erlang: FTBFS: hipe_x86_bifs.S:278: undefined reference to `erts_restore_fpu')

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:17:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#456868: fixed in erlang 1:11.b.5dfsg-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#458555: dpkg: error processing mono-gac (--configure)

2008-01-01 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
Package: mono-gac Version: 1.2.6+dfsg-5 Severity: grave upgrade mono-gac fails: $ sudo apt-get -t unstable install mono-gac Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done mono-gac is already the newest version. The following packages were automatic

Bug#458440: Is uninstallable

2008-01-01 Thread Ricardo Mones
Hi Marc, On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:06:44 +0100 Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: sylpheed-claws-gtk2 > Version: 3.2.0-1 > Severity: serious > > Heya, > > Your current try of providing a transitional package is failing > miserable, the claws-mail version sylpheed-claws

Bug#432864: Plugin available in audacious

2008-01-01 Thread Adrien Cunin
Hi, FYI, there is already an alarm plugin available for audacious, in the audacious-plugins-extra package. Therefore I think this package can be safely removed from the archive. -- Adrien Cunin aka Adri2000 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#453652: rsync: prone to symlink attacks

2008-01-01 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 02:18:28PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote: > On Fri 30 Nov 2007, Nico Golde wrote: > > > attached is an NMU proposal to fix this bug just in case you > > have no time to fix this. > > Is this based on upstream's patch? > > > For this I needed to backport the patch cause it w

Bug#379388: License of pgapack

2008-01-01 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 1 January 2008 at 16:41, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: | On 05/11/07 at 17:24 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > On 5 November 2007 at 19:25, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: | > | Hi Dirk, | > | | > | Has there been any progress on this since your phone call? | > | > Very much so -- full agreement in pri

Processed: merge

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forcemerge 458443 458455 Bug#458443: mono-gac uninstallable in sid Bug#458455: mono-gac: postinst fails with mono-addins packages installed Forcibly Merged 458443 458455. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. De

Bug#458447: marked as done (dovecot-imapd: Can't connect to dovecot since 1.0.9 (from 1.0.5))

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Jan 2008 20:57:59 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#458447: dovecot-imapd: Can't connect to dovecot since 1.0.9 (from 1.0.5) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Processed: reassign and merge 458555

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forcemerge 458555 458463 Bug#458555: dpkg: error processing mono-gac (--configure) Bug#458463: mono-gac: postinst fails with mono-addins packages installed Bug#458540: mono-gac fails to install Forcibly Merged 458463 458540 458555. > reassign 458555 mo

Bug#458443: mono-gac/mono-addins upgrade issue fixed in mono-addins 0.3-2

2008-01-01 Thread Mirco Bauer
This issue is fixed in mono-addins 0.3-2 If you upgraded mono-gac and have mono-addins 0.3-1, you will be stuck in an upgrade path which must be fixed by hand. mono-gac upgrade fails and leaves mono-runtime unconfigured, means the new mono-addins 0.3-2 doesn't want to be installed as it depends o

Bug#443451: marked as done (balsa: Links to a GPL library and to OpenSSL)

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Jan 2008 19:14:21 -0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Solved after gmime 2.2.11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#458585: amule: not installable in sid

2008-01-01 Thread Richard Antony Burton
Package: amule Version: 2.1.3-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The following packages have unmet dependencies. amule: Depends: libcrypto++6 but it is not installable E: Broken packages Regards, Richard. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers u

Bug#458584: nspluginwrapper: plays flash content briefly then turns to gray screen

2008-01-01 Thread Norval Watson
Subject: nspluginwrapper: plays flash content briefly then turns to gray screen Package: nspluginwrapper Version: 0.9.91.5-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** nspluginwrapper installs ok and installs flash plugin ok. When viewi

Bug#458455: marked as done (mono-gac: postinst fails with mono-addins packages installed)

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Jan 2008 21:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#458443: fixed in mono-addins 0.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#458443: marked as done (mono-gac uninstallable in sid)

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Jan 2008 21:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#458443: fixed in mono-addins 0.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#458590: lazarus: FTBFS: Error: Target "linux", package "rtl" not found

2008-01-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: lazarus Version: 0.9.24-0-3 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: # Add here commands to configure the package. find -name 'Makefile.fpc' | xargs fpcmake Processing ./lcl/interfaces/Makefile.fpc Error: Target "linux", package "rtl" not found mak

Bug#379388: License of pgapack

2008-01-01 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 1 January 2008 at 16:41, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: | On 05/11/07 at 17:24 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > On 5 November 2007 at 19:25, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: | > | Hi Dirk, | > | | > | Has there been any progress on this since your phone call? | > | > Very much so -- full agreement in pri

Processed: severity of 436164 is serious

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > # kpdf should not contain any copy of xpdf in lenny > severity 436164 serious Bug#436164: kpdf: Should link against poppler Severity set to `serious' from `important' > End of messa

Processed: reassign 369386 to lynx,lynx-cur ..., severity of 369386 is serious

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > reassign 369386 lynx,lynx-cur Bug#369386: Separate lynx-cur package should probably not be included in Etch Bug reassigned from package `lynx-cur' to `lynx,lynx-cur'. > retitle 3693

Processed: setting package to libdevice-cdio-perl, tagging 456845

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > package libdevice-cdio-perl Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libdevice-cdio-perl > tags 456845 + pending Bug#456845: libdevice-cdio-perl: FTBFS: tests failed There were no tags set. T

Processed: severity of 436164 is important

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > severity 436164 important Bug#436164: kpdf: Should link against poppler Severity set to `important' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#454951: gcc-snapshot: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library libgcj.so.9

2008-01-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Kurt Roeckx, le Sat 08 Dec 2007 14:47:59 +0100, a écrit : > Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following error: > dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library libgcj.so.9 needed by > debian/gcc-snapshot/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib64/libgcj_bc.so.1.0.0 (its RPATH > is ''). > Note: l

Bug#414702: marked as done (therion_0.5.0-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: missing png.h)

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 02:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#414702: fixed in therion 0.5.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#458526: marked as done (warzone2100: FTBFS: /bin/sh: zip: command not found)

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 02:47:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#458526: fixed in warzone2100 2.1.0~0.svn3260-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#458606: /usr/bin/eclipse: "sudo apt-get --purge remove libswt3.2-gtk-*" reinstall worked for me.

2008-01-01 Thread Jivan Amara
Package: eclipse Version: 3.2.1-6 Severity: grave File: /usr/bin/eclipse Justification: renders package unusable This bug started for me after installing and removing two UML editors that interface with Eclipse: Omondo, and Poseidon, using their own installers rather than apt. I suspect these pa

Bug#451403: ack-grep: FTBFS: Test failure

2008-01-01 Thread Jose Luis Rivas Contreras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It just built fine in my pbuilder fully updated in amd64. Here's a quote of the relevant part: == 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/00-load.# Testing App::Ack 1.72, Perl 5.008008, /usr/bin/perl ok t/ack-1...ok t/ack-a...ok

Processed: twiki: FTBFS: `Depends' field, syntax error after reference to package `perl'

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 453193 patch Bug#453193: twiki: FTBFS: `Depends' field, syntax error after reference to package `perl' There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syst

Bug#457423: Patch used in Ubuntu

2008-01-01 Thread Ming Hua
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 03:41:53AM -0600, Ming Hua wrote: > > The fix is > also not very hard, the script just need to check the md5sum of the > conffile, something like the examples in [1]. > > 1. http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling The attached patch is what I used in Ubuntu's 0.9.9-2

Bug#453193: twiki: FTBFS: `Depends' field, syntax error after reference to package `perl'

2008-01-01 Thread Jose Luis Rivas Contreras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tags 453193 patch quit Hi, {perl:Depends} it's not supposed to be versioned, perl should go along if you want it with a version, the attached patch should fix this issue. Regards. - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. PGP: 0xCACAB118 http:

Bug#385115: Chromium BSU sounds/music issue

2008-01-01 Thread Paul Wise
Hi Mark, I (and others) previously contacted you about the sounds and music in your Chromium BSU game. In summary you stated: * you are busy * Debian should repackage chromium-data with alternatives * in your opinion the alternative music doesn't fit the game * you had int

Bug#458615: haskell-hsql: FTBFS with haskell-devscripts 0.6.0

2008-01-01 Thread Arjan Oosting
Package: haskell-hsql Version: 1.6-8.2 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: no longer builds from source -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, A couple of days ago I uploaded haskell-devscripts 0.6.0 on which your package has a build dependency. Since this version of haskell-

Processed: submitter

2008-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter #458620 ! Bug#458620: ruby1.9: Rubygems not working Changed Bug submitter from James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to James Healy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug t

Bug#458620: ruby1.9: Rubygems not working

2008-01-01 Thread James
Package: ruby1.9 Version: 1.9.0.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I can install gems correctly using gem1.9 (ie. gem1.9 install fastercsv), however when I then try to use that gem in code: gem 'fastercsv' I get: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./test.rb gem_prelude.rb:103:in `r

Bug#458149: Broken setup

2008-01-01 Thread Matthieu Baechler
On sam, 2007-12-29 at 11:54 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Then, same question: do you have libsane-extras installed ? Yes -- Matthieu Baechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]