Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 458449 important
Bug#458449: Starting of x.org fails with "PreInitDAL failed"
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
severity 458449 important
thanks
Le Monday 31 December 2007 14:57:54 Georgi Naplatanov, vous avez écrit :
> Package: fglrx-driver
> Version: 8.44.3-1
> Severity: critical
Not for everyone...
> After installation of fglrx-driver 8.44.3-1, x.org did not start.
It would be nice if you could add h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 458481 57+dfsg-2
Bug#458481: kvm: Doesn't boot anymore, when using 58+dfsg-1 (but does with
57+dfsg-2)
Bug no longer marked as found in version 57+dfsg-2.
> found 458481 58+dfsg-1
Bug#458481: kvm: Doesn't boot anymore, when using 58+dfsg-1 (b
This problem doesn't belong to brasero. My Debian doesn't see any blank
disc. I tried Gnome baker, nautilus and brasero.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: lirc-modules-source
Version: 0.8.0-13
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
This is probably a duplicate of 457858, but since there are no real details
given I don't want to hijack it. Please merge mine with it if you want to.
lirc_dev does not compile, at l
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Severity: grave
Tags: wontfix, security, help
I'm tagging this bug "wontfix" to express that I don't intend to spend
time on this old version of flashplugin-nonfree written in Ruby in
"oldstable". As said before on bugs 433687 and 402822, NMU welcome.
--- Begin Mess
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 14:16 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can you please elucidate on why Lenny will not have this package?
Yes:
Most newer versions of the Adobe Flash Player are a combination of new
features and fixes for security bugs. The Debian Security Team does not
support "contrib" an
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 16:08 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we plan to have flashplugin-nonfree available for debian stable users. Either
> via volatile or via backports.org.
Not via volatile.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2007/12/msg00179.html
Yes, I intend to maintain a package
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 16:33 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What about for Debian Testing users? as far as I understand there isn't an
> equivalent in Testing of backports.org or volatile.
I intend to maintain the package in unstable in a way that it is
compatible with testing without delay. So
Package: warzone2100
Version: 2.1.0~0.svn3260-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
cd aivolution && zip -ru0 ../aivolution.wz multiplay commands.txt
installation.txt -x *svn*
/bin/sh: zip: command not found
make[5]: *** [aivolution.wz] Error 127
Ku
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 457416 normal
Bug#457416: iceweasel hangs after start with backtrace
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Package: clamav
Version: 0.90.1-3etch7
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Two new CVEs for clamav:
Name: CVE-2007-6595
Status: Candidate
URL: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-6595
Reference: BUGTRAQ:20071229 TK53 Advisory #2: Multiple vulnerabilities in ClamAV
Reference:
UR
severity 457416 normal
thanks
Not starting when a config file is corrupted is not a grave bug.
Downgrading to allow testing migration.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 456867 patch
Bug#456867: gnat-4.2: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library
libgnat-4.2.so.1 needed by debian/libgnatprj4.2/usr/lib/libgnatprj.so.4.2 (its
RPATH is '').
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping pro
Your message dated Tue, 01 Jan 2008 14:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#446795: fixed in rootstrap 0.3.24-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 01 Jan 2008 14:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#446729: fixed in rootstrap 0.3.24-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi Nelson,
I see that you tagged this bug "pending" in November, but that there
hasn't been an upload since then. Are you still planning to upload a new
package?
I maintain the ruby bindings for imagemagick, and their new version
requires imagemagick >= 6.3.
Something else: I see that you are no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 456892 pending
Bug#456892: python-scipy: FTBFS: Error: Unable to find 'suitesparse/umfpack.h'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tags 456867 patch
thanks
I added one patch to fix this RC bug:
gnat-4.2: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library
libgnat-4.2.so.1 needed by
debian/libgnatprj4.2/usr/lib/libgnatprj.so.4.2 (its RPATH is '').
The problem was related to mi
Your message dated Tue, 01 Jan 2008 15:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458450: fixed in libaqbanking 3.0.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>> Does your AqBanking 2.x work now again?
>
> yes.
Good. I just uploaded a fixed package.
>> If yes I'll try to do these steps on libaqbanking-data's postinst script
>> on installation.
>
> I would think that dpkg first removes the files and dirs associated
Hi Neil,
* Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-01 15:26]:
[...]
> I'd say ignore CVE-2007-6596, as clamav also doesn't recognise
> insert-random-proprietary-encoding-here either, so it's not really a
> valid issue (imo).
Isn't the problem with this that mailers exist that treat
such conte
severity 449353 normal
reassign 449353 wnpp
retitle 449353 O: bibletime -- A bible study tool for KDE
thanks
On 05/11/07 at 12:16 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that
> should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because:
>
> * 2 RC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 449353 normal
Bug#449353: bibletime: should this package be orphaned?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> reassign 449353 wnpp
Bug#449353: bibletime: should this package be orphaned?
Bug reassigned from package `bibletime' to `wnpp'.
>
On 12/12/07 at 15:26 -0500, Andrés Roldán wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that
> > should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because:
> >
> > * 4 RC bugs with no recent activity
> Please don't orphan this package as I am now packaging Ere
On 15/11/07 at 08:44 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05/11/2007):
> > If you think that it should be orphaned instead of being removed from
> > Debian, please reply to this bug and tell so.
>
> Just to keep you posted, there are some ongoing discussions on the l
Package: azureus
Version: 3.0.3.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
I just installed azureus. It does not work, looks like a missing
dependency.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~> azureus
/usr/bin/azureus: line 10: exec: java: not found
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~> which java
java not found
Regards, Thue
Happy new year,
I am sorry, in fact it was my error, I was using a plugin I
compiled myself and there was a problem with it, it caused this
error and I couldn't find anything in the log (but there should be
a place if I look carefully where there is an error :)
Sorry again for this and thanks you
On 05/11/07 at 17:24 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 5 November 2007 at 19:25, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> | Hi Dirk,
> |
> | Has there been any progress on this since your phone call?
>
> Very much so -- full agreement in principle by all parties to release under
> the MPICH2 license (which
Package: nunit
Version: 2.2.8-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-orphan
Hi,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that
should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because:
* Severely outdated. According to
http://www.nunit.com/index.php?
Package: muine
Version: 0.8.7-1.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-orphan
Hi,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that
should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because:
* Several RC bugs opened for a long time with no action from the
Package: ninpaths
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Hi,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Last upload in 2002.
* Very low popcon (2 insts).
* Several bugs.
If you
Package: lpc-mode
Version: 0.15-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Hi,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* very low popcon (10 insts).
* no upload since 2002.
* doesn't work with em
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> severity 458553 normal
Bug#458553: ninpaths: should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> reassign 458553 ftp.debian.org
Bug#458553: ninpaths: should th
Your message dated Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:17:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#456868: fixed in erlang 1:11.b.5dfsg-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: mono-gac
Version: 1.2.6+dfsg-5
Severity: grave
upgrade mono-gac fails:
$ sudo apt-get -t unstable install mono-gac
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
mono-gac is already the newest version.
The following packages were automatic
Hi Marc,
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:06:44 +0100
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: sylpheed-claws-gtk2
> Version: 3.2.0-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Heya,
>
> Your current try of providing a transitional package is failing
> miserable, the claws-mail version sylpheed-claws
Hi,
FYI, there is already an alarm plugin available for audacious, in the
audacious-plugins-extra package.
Therefore I think this package can be safely removed from the archive.
--
Adrien Cunin aka Adri2000
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 02:18:28PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Fri 30 Nov 2007, Nico Golde wrote:
>
> > attached is an NMU proposal to fix this bug just in case you
> > have no time to fix this.
>
> Is this based on upstream's patch?
>
> > For this I needed to backport the patch cause it w
On 1 January 2008 at 16:41, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
| On 05/11/07 at 17:24 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 5 November 2007 at 19:25, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
| > | Hi Dirk,
| > |
| > | Has there been any progress on this since your phone call?
| >
| > Very much so -- full agreement in pri
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 458443 458455
Bug#458443: mono-gac uninstallable in sid
Bug#458455: mono-gac: postinst fails with mono-addins packages installed
Forcibly Merged 458443 458455.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
De
Your message dated Tue, 1 Jan 2008 20:57:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458447: dovecot-imapd: Can't connect to dovecot since
1.0.9 (from 1.0.5)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 458555 458463
Bug#458555: dpkg: error processing mono-gac (--configure)
Bug#458463: mono-gac: postinst fails with mono-addins packages installed
Bug#458540: mono-gac fails to install
Forcibly Merged 458463 458540 458555.
> reassign 458555 mo
This issue is fixed in mono-addins 0.3-2
If you upgraded mono-gac and have mono-addins 0.3-1, you will be stuck
in an upgrade path which must be fixed by hand.
mono-gac upgrade fails and leaves mono-runtime unconfigured, means the
new mono-addins 0.3-2 doesn't want to be installed as it depends o
Your message dated Tue, 1 Jan 2008 19:14:21 -0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Solved after gmime 2.2.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Package: amule
Version: 2.1.3-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The following packages have unmet dependencies.
amule: Depends: libcrypto++6 but it is not installable
E: Broken packages
Regards, Richard.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers u
Subject: nspluginwrapper: plays flash content briefly then turns to gray screen
Package: nspluginwrapper
Version: 0.9.91.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
nspluginwrapper installs ok and installs flash plugin ok.
When viewi
Your message dated Tue, 01 Jan 2008 21:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458443: fixed in mono-addins 0.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 01 Jan 2008 21:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458443: fixed in mono-addins 0.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: lazarus
Version: 0.9.24-0-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
# Add here commands to configure the package.
find -name 'Makefile.fpc' | xargs fpcmake
Processing ./lcl/interfaces/Makefile.fpc
Error: Target "linux", package "rtl" not found
mak
On 1 January 2008 at 16:41, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
| On 05/11/07 at 17:24 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 5 November 2007 at 19:25, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
| > | Hi Dirk,
| > |
| > | Has there been any progress on this since your phone call?
| >
| > Very much so -- full agreement in pri
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> # kpdf should not contain any copy of xpdf in lenny
> severity 436164 serious
Bug#436164: kpdf: Should link against poppler
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
>
End of messa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> reassign 369386 lynx,lynx-cur
Bug#369386: Separate lynx-cur package should probably not be included in Etch
Bug reassigned from package `lynx-cur' to `lynx,lynx-cur'.
> retitle 3693
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> package libdevice-cdio-perl
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libdevice-cdio-perl
> tags 456845 + pending
Bug#456845: libdevice-cdio-perl: FTBFS: tests failed
There were no tags set.
T
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> severity 436164 important
Bug#436164: kpdf: Should link against poppler
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Kurt Roeckx, le Sat 08 Dec 2007 14:47:59 +0100, a écrit :
> Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following error:
> dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library libgcj.so.9 needed by
> debian/gcc-snapshot/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib64/libgcj_bc.so.1.0.0 (its RPATH
> is '').
> Note: l
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 02:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#414702: fixed in therion 0.5.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 02:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458526: fixed in warzone2100 2.1.0~0.svn3260-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.1-6
Severity: grave
File: /usr/bin/eclipse
Justification: renders package unusable
This bug started for me after installing and removing two UML editors
that interface with Eclipse: Omondo, and Poseidon, using their own
installers rather than apt. I suspect these pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It just built fine in my pbuilder fully updated in amd64. Here's a quote
of the relevant part:
==
'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/00-load.# Testing App::Ack 1.72, Perl 5.008008, /usr/bin/perl
ok
t/ack-1...ok
t/ack-a...ok
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 453193 patch
Bug#453193: twiki: FTBFS: `Depends' field, syntax error after reference to
package `perl'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 03:41:53AM -0600, Ming Hua wrote:
>
> The fix is
> also not very hard, the script just need to check the md5sum of the
> conffile, something like the examples in [1].
>
> 1. http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling
The attached patch is what I used in Ubuntu's 0.9.9-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tags 453193 patch
quit
Hi,
{perl:Depends} it's not supposed to be versioned, perl should go along
if you want it with a version, the attached patch should fix this issue.
Regards.
- --
Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. PGP: 0xCACAB118
http:
Hi Mark,
I (and others) previously contacted you about the sounds and music in
your Chromium BSU game. In summary you stated:
* you are busy
* Debian should repackage chromium-data with alternatives
* in your opinion the alternative music doesn't fit the game
* you had int
Package: haskell-hsql
Version: 1.6-8.2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
A couple of days ago I uploaded haskell-devscripts 0.6.0 on which your
package has a build dependency. Since this version of
haskell-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter #458620 !
Bug#458620: ruby1.9: Rubygems not working
Changed Bug submitter from James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to James Healy <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
Package: ruby1.9
Version: 1.9.0.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I can install gems correctly using gem1.9 (ie. gem1.9 install
fastercsv), however when I then try to use that gem in code:
gem 'fastercsv'
I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./test.rb
gem_prelude.rb:103:in `r
On sam, 2007-12-29 at 11:54 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Then, same question: do you have libsane-extras installed ?
Yes
--
Matthieu Baechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
68 matches
Mail list logo