sftp-server is in openssh-server package and scp is in openssh-client package.
So, both sever and client package should be listed in build dependency.
On Dec 26, 2007 3:54 PM, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Tatsuo Sekine:
>
> > Configure script tries to detect sftp-server and scp bi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 442984 + patch
Bug#442984: kvdr - FTBFS: kvdr.cpp:104: error: invalid conversion from 'int*'
to 'unsigned int*'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 08:21:50PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 01:06:12PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 11:52:47AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > Philipp, I'm attaching a patch for the __floatundisf. There might be
> > > others,
> > > though.
tags 457446 +patch
thanks
Patch as received from maintainer.
Thijs
diff -u typo3-src-4.0.2+debian/debian/changelog typo3-src-4.0.2+debian/debian/changelog
--- typo3-src-4.0.2+debian/debian/changelog
+++ typo3-src-4.0.2+debian/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+typo3-src (4.0.2+debian-4) stable-s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 457446 +patch
Bug#457446: typo3-src: CVE-2007-6381 SQL injection
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
tags 442984 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my kvdr 0.64-5.1 NMU.
Ana
diff -u kvdr-0.64/debian/changelog kvdr-0.64/debian/changelog
--- kvdr-0.64/debian/changelog
+++ kvdr-0.64/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+kvdr (0.64-5.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ *
Yves Caniou wrote:
> During the post-install step, I obtain a segfault with the following message:
>
> Paramétrage de libgphoto2-2 (2.4.0-8) ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/libgphoto2-2.postinst: line 13: 20760 Erreur de
> segmentation /usr/lib/$PACKAGE/print-camera-list udev-rules version 0.98
> mod
Package: chkrootkit
Version: 0.47-1.1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
In testing for the Enye LKM, chkrootkit sends signal 58 to PID 12345.
This has a chance of hitting any one process of 1/32767. On the
system I am typing this on in its current state, I have 350 proce
Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2007 11:52:58 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#457812: module-init-tools: ..it DEMAAANDS!!! removal of
2.4.* kernels
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Hi,
> This is critical as the whole system security may be affected.
>
> So if using the default USEDEVPTS=yes the /dev/pts inside the chroot
> will be mounted with no gid setting. As the kernel share for the devpts
> fs is shared between all devpts the gid setting of
> /etc/init.d/mountdevsub
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 446343 unreproducible moreinfo help
Bug#446343: cutter: does not work at all
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo, help
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trac
Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2007 11:17:14 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#457557: fixed in wine 0.9.51-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
If I understand the last comment correctly, configure is still being run
because on x86_64 debian/rules still sets NATIVE_BUILD = build32, and
the build-indep-stamp depends on $(subst
build,configure,$(NATIVE_BUILD)) (which turns out to be "configure32")
which runs configure since DEB_SAVEBUILD isn
Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2007 11:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#457558: fixed in tlf 0.9.32.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Tuesday 25 December 2007 22:52:29 Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> Does it work better if you set is_core_pointer to 0 instead of 1?
>
> Cheers,
> Julien
Hello, again.
I'm afraid that the change appears to make no difference at all.
I can still cat /dev/ttyS1 and see the stuff being sent, but nothin
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 03:41:57PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> tags 449147 +pending
> thanks
>
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 03:26:41PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Your package is currently uninstallable:
> > libghemical0c2a: Depends: libghemical-data (= 2.10-1+b1) but 2.10-1 is to
> > be insta
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 02:28:21PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> [FTBFS] unless `libboost-dev' is installed.
>
> This is not a bug in rrootage, [...]
> This is only a bug in libbulletml-dev which is missing a Depends.
>
> You need to:
> - Have libbulletml-dev add the Depends
> - after the new libbul
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 08:24:43PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> severity 52 serious
> tag 52 patch pending
> thanks
>
> "Trent W. Buck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/09/2007):
> > Package: rrootage
> > Severity: minor
> >
> > This package fails to build from source unless the package
> > `li
PhallusFull-sizeRodger
http://volertox.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> reassign 457833 dpkg-dev 1.14.12
Bug#457833: dpkg-shlibdeps: Doesn't find 32 bit libraries on amd64.
Bug reassigned from package `dpkg' to `dpkg-dev'.
> forcemerge 453885 457833
Bug
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 02:54:11PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> forcemerge 453885 457833
> thanks
>
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > When building wine on amd64 we get the following error:
> > dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: no dependency information found for
> > /usr/lib32/libxml2.so.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 455208 normal
Bug#455208: foxyproxy: addon-specific prefs only visible on 2nd use of the
prefs dialog
Severity set to `normal' from `important'
> tags 455208 + moreinfo
Bug#455208: foxyproxy: addon-specific prefs only visible on 2nd use of th
Package: lirc-modules-source
Version: 0.8.0-13
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This has now been true for months.
Please stop producing the lirc-modules-source package if you cannot make it
compile properly.
This bug IS grave. I'm sorry.
-- System Information:
Debian R
severity 455208 normal
tags 455208 + moreinfo
severity 455206 wishlist
retitle 455206 [retitled] foxyproxy: use internal iceweasel's proxy settings as
default
thanks
Hi Yann,
Thanks for reporting.
Recent upstream release 2.6.2 made foxyproxy disabled by default after
installation (I just upload
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> fixed 457446 4.1.4-1
Bug#457446: typo3-src: CVE-2007-6381 SQL injection
Bug marked as fixed in version 4.1.4-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Paul TBBle Hampson skrev:
If I understand the last comment correctly, configure is still being run
because on x86_64 debian/rules still sets NATIVE_BUILD = build32, and
the build-indep-stamp depends on $(subst
build,configure,$(NATIVE_BUILD)) (which turns out to be "configure32")
which runs confi
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 05:40:09PM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> reassign 457741 dpkg
Did you succeed in cloning this? If so, what's the # for the dpkg bug?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 02:19:26PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 03:41:57PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > tags 449147 +pending
> > thanks
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 03:26:41PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > Your package is currently uninstallable:
> > > libghemical0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package: octaviz
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: octaviz
> severity 452436 normal
Bug#452436: octaviz: examples do not run because of line vtk_init
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> tags 452436 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#452436: octaviz: example
Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:28:26 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line captury: FTBFS: /usr/include/libelf.h:98: error: expected
specifier-qualifier-list before 'off64_t'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:22:43 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#442984: fixed in kvdr 0.64-5.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:22:57 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#457334: fixed in syslog-ng 2.0.5-3+lenny1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
package: octaviz
severity 452436 normal
tags 452436 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Am Donnerstag, den 22.11.2007, 21:12 + schrieb =?UTF-8?Q?
Jo=C3=A3o?= Franco:
> Package: octaviz
> Version: 0.4.5-5
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
I can't reproduce this with the cu
Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:22:52 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#457569: fixed in ocaml 3.10.0-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:22:54 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453862: fixed in pbuilder 0.177
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 52 libbulletml-dev
Bug#52: Undeclared build dependency: libboost-dev
Bug reassigned from package `rrootage' to `libbulletml-dev'.
> merge 443718 52
Bug#443718: rrootage - FTBFS: error: boost/smart_ptr.hpp: No such file or
director
On Mi, 26 Dez 2007, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 05:40:09PM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > reassign 457741 dpkg
>
> Did you succeed in cloning this? If so, what's the # for the dpkg bug?
No, I didn't manage it because it was merged with other bugs and thus
told me "please use
Hi,
the bug "slapd: Cannot install due to postinst error" (#452749) is
31 days old and since 28 days tagged with 'pending'. Are there any
plans when the fixed package will be uploaded?
thx && regards,
-mika-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2007 19:32:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#457735: fixed in virt-manager 0.5.2+hg071220-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
FYI,
I dug a little deeper wrt to the test failures in the Ruby bindings.
Comparing the code generated with swig 1.31 and 1.33,
e.g. ./subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/core.c,
swig 1.33 added lines of the form
vresult = rb_ary_new();
to lots of wrapper functions. If I comment out these and rebuil
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.7.197-1
Severity: grave
X is unusable since an upgrade to 1:6.7.197-1. X server seems to start
correctly but screen remain black and CPU is to 100% to Xorg process. It
is impossible to kill X with Ctrl+Alt+BackSpace.
With these packages, there is no pr
On Dec 26, Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ..for this, I need your Conflict statement changed into a Suggest
> or somesuch that will allow the co-existence of these 2 packages
> on the same box, so I can growl at LaMont on future conflicts.
You do not understand the issue and I am not
Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2007 19:47:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#457328: fixed in xine-lib 1.1.8-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 11:52:58 +0100, Marco wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Dec 26, Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Justification: ..dunno Debian Policy, but it should recommend, not
> > DEMAAAND!!! removal of 2.4 kernels
>
> This is a feature, support for 2.4 kernels re
Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:47:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#455472: fixed in splashy 0.3.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:47:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453349: fixed in splashy 0.3.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:47:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#455685: fixed in splashy 0.3.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Libraries:
libceguiogre-dev
libogre-dev
I hope we can find a way to compile against those libraries, because
I'll will need the cegui-mk2 extensions for ogre, in order to ITP ember.
I'll investigate further and keep you informed.
Regards,
--
Ing. Erick Vresnev Castellanos Hernández
"Libert
Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#457478: fixed in mnogosearch 3.3.6-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:47:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#455872: fixed in splashy 0.3.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:47:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#455259: fixed in splashy 0.3.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: zapping
Version: 0.9.6-4+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The channel editor crashes Zapping.
Reproduce: start the program, select "Edit -> Channels" from the menu. The
program crashes.
An error message is printed to the screen:
(zapping:25763): Gtk-CRITICAL
PROVIN Aurélien wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.7.197-1
Severity: grave
X is unusable since an upgrade to 1:6.7.197-1. X server seems to start
correctly but screen remain black and CPU is to 100% to Xorg process. It
is impossible to kill X with Ctrl+Alt+BackSpace.
Please
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:54:35 +0100, Marco wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Dec 26, Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ..for this, I need your Conflict statement changed into a Suggest
> > or somesuch that will allow the co-existence of these 2 packages
> > on the same box,
Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2007 22:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432485: fixed in libwww-mechanize-perl 1.34-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ove Kaaven wrote:
> Paul TBBle Hampson skrev:
>> If I understand the last comment correctly, configure is still being run
>> because on x86_64 debian/rules still sets NATIVE_BUILD = build32, and
>> the build-indep-stamp depends on $(subst
>> build,conf
Package: youtube-dl
Version: 2006.11.12-1
Followup-For: Bug #439363
try this. no claims that it will fork for age restricted files, but for regular
files it appears to fix it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (990, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 04:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#457507: fixed in zoneminder 1.22.3-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # in SVN, ready to upload shortly
> tags 456860 pending
Bug#456860: gromacs: FTBFS: checking size of int... configure: error: cannot
compute sizeof (int)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 15:10:37 -0600, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
This could be caused by the missing dependency on python-pyorbit, but
only if it has been automatically removed from your system during the
upgrade.
Does 2.20.1-2 work for you?
Thank you for the work...
Un
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # should work on the next upload
> tag 451991 pending
Bug#451991: gromacs-openmpi: Binaries missing
There were no tags set.
Bug#451993: gromacs-openmpi: build fails silently if libopenmpi-dev installed
before lam4-dev/libmpich1.0-dev
Tags added: pe
61 matches
Mail list logo
