Version: 0.8.6.c-3+b2
This version is still the version that will fix the issue.
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
reopen 447667
thanks
It seems that the rebuild was never rescheduled, sid still has
0.8.6.c-3.
Which indeed indicates that the rebuild did not reach the archive yet.
As [0] doesn't seem
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 07:54:44AM +, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > When running debfoster, it asks me wether I want to keep
> > python-celementtree (that only keeps python-elementtree). If I answer
> > Y, it will also remove bzr and bzrtools, although I haven't been asked
> > about them. Even expl
* Pierre Habouzit:
> To reproduce the bug just install bzr, that should pull
> python-celementree, and then run debfoster, it'll ask to remove
> python-celementree, if you accept it will also remove apt. You can do
> that easily in a freshly deboostraped chroot.
I can only reproduce that it wil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 447667 0.8.6.c-3+b2
Bug#447667: please rebuild vlc against libiso9660-5 and libcdio7
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 0.8.6.c-3+b2, send any further explanations to
Evgeni Gol
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 446891 1:4.2.4p4+dfsg-2
Bug#446891: ntp: problem of dependency related to libssl0.9.8
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1:4.2.4p4+dfsg-2, send any further explanations
to [EMAI
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 08:25:21AM +, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Pierre Habouzit:
>
> > To reproduce the bug just install bzr, that should pull
> > python-celementree, and then run debfoster, it'll ask to remove
> > python-celementree, if you accept it will also remove apt. You can do
> > tha
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 08:24:33AM +, Luk Claes wrote:
> Version: 0.8.6.c-3+b2
>
> This version is still the version that will fix the issue.
>
> Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> >reopen 447667
> >thanks
> >It seems that the rebuild was never rescheduled, sid still has
> >0.8.6.c-3.
>
> Which inde
I can confirm the segfaults as well. =/
Intuos 3 (9x12")
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello:
I have looked a little further into the issue. The problem is not as general
as I thought, gs mostly work, and the kde printing system is not broken. The
problem is just a presentation problem.
Printing preview are not working with current sid ghostscript, but printing
actually oc
Oops. I accidentally reopened this bug; a different bug was closed by
spam, and I mis-typed the bug number when trying to reopen that. I
can't seem to figure out what the state of this bug was before I
reopened it. Please feel free to restore it to what it was before.
Thanks.
--
Hubert Cha
Package: xinetd
Version: 1:2.3.14-1.1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
xinetd diverts inetd (as provided by openbsd-inetd or netkit-inetd), but
the default configuration does not read its configuration file
(-inetd_compat switch).
Thus any services in /etc/inetd.conf ar
Package: mnogosearch-sqlite
Version: 3.2.37-3.3
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-vserver-6
Am Sun, 28. Oct 2007, 15:51:36 +0100 schrieb Fathi Boudra:
> could you try latest strigi package (0.5.6) and tell me if it is affected ?
I tried version 0.5.7. The "error window after each keystroke" bug is
gone. That does not make strigi useable however, the deskbar-applet
now displays a line
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10
> tags 447658 pending
Bug#447658: gammu: When backuping SMS, Numbers are not saved
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 448488 2.6.22-1
Bug#448488: linux-image-2.6.22-3-r4k-ip22: crashes hard on boot
Bug marked as found in version 2.6.22-1.
> found 448488 2.6.22-4
Bug#448488: linux-image-2.6.22-3-r4k-ip22: crashes hard on boot
Bug marked as found in version 2.6.22
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:06:49 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429131: fixed in libapache2-mod-rpaf 0.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Hi Amaya,
* Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-29 10:40]:
> Sven Dowideit wrote:
> > I've uploaded a new version to
> > http://distributedinformation.com/TWikiDebian/ (twiki_4.1.2-3_all.deb)
>
> Please remove me from uploaders.
I am going to sponsor the twiki upload now.
Sven, no need to make a n
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:29:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#448622: mnogosearch-sqlite: overwrites an already
installed /usr/lib/cgi-bin/search.cgi
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Nico Golde wrote:
> I just remove Amaya from Uploaders before the build
thx!
> but please keep track on it in future versions then.
I am subscribed to the pts.
Happy sponsoring!
--
·''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution
: :' :
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#444982: fixed in twiki 1:4.1.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 447139 normal
Bug#447139: nvidia-glx: Nvidia driver doesn't work with a 6100
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> tags 447139 +wontfix
Bug#447139: nvidia-glx: Nvidia driver doesn't work with a 6100
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wont
severity 447139 normal
tags 447139 +wontfix
tags 447139 +upstream
tags 447139 +etch
thanks
Hi,
this is a bug reported against the package present in etch which does
and has never supported the Geforce Go 6100 card (it supports the
non-mobile Geforce 6100 card, though). To make your card run, you
severity 420081 normal
tags 420081 = moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
I've just tested this on a bare Debian 4.0 installation. Installed only
jabber-1.4.3-3.3, created a self signed SSL certificate, and made the
minimal changes necessary to configure the server to use the certificate
and communicat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 420081 normal
Bug#420081: jabber: stops responding as soon as s2s is used
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> tags 420081 = moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#420081: jabber: stops responding as soon as s2s is used
Tags were: patch
Tags set to: m
Hi,
> By the way, a suggestion for the names of packages: is it possible
> to change ghostscript-x to ghostscript, and rename ghostscript to
> ghostscript-nox? This naming policy may be more consistent with
> other debian packages. e.g., vim and vim-nox, emacs22 and
> emacs22-nox, etc.
Thanks fo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 448526 libcdio
Bug#448526: gstreamer0.10-plugins-good: Uninstallable. Needs rebuilding.
Bug reassigned from package `gstreamer0.10-plugins-good' to `libcdio'.
> retitle 448526 Please request bin NMUs for SONAME transition
Bug#448526: gstreamer
reassign 448526 libcdio
retitle 448526 Please request bin NMUs for SONAME transition
forcemerge 447023 448526
stop
Am Montag, den 29.10.2007, 19:38 + schrieb Rob Bradford:
> Package: gstreamer0.10-plugins-good
> Version: 0.10.3-6
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 440632 CVE-2007-5707 remote denial of service with malformed
> objectClasses attribute
Bug#440632: ldapadd with 'objectClasses' instead of 'objectClass' brings slapd
down
Changed Bug title to `CVE-2007-5707 remote denial of service with malfor
retitle 440632 CVE-2007-5707 remote denial of service with malformed
objectClasses attribute
thanks
Hi,
this is CVE-2007-5707.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
pgp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> # Fix posted on gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.devel
> tags 448377 confirmed patch
Bug#448377: libgcrypt11_1.3.1-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: undefined reference
to `__udiv_qrnnd'
There w
Package: slapd
Version: 2.3.38
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for slapd.
CVE-2007-5708[0]:
Name: CVE-2007-5708
Status: Candidate
URL: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-5708
Reference: MISC:http:
Package: gstreamer0.10-plugins-good
Version: 0.10.6-3
Severity: grave
Trying to install the package returns:
gstreamer0.10-plugins-good: Depends: libcdio6 but it is not installable
In fact, libcdio6 seems to have been removed in favor of libcdio7.
Makes several multimedia apps not available (rh
reassign 448648 libcdio
retitle 448648 Please request bin NMUs for SONAME transition
forcemerge 447023 448648
stop
Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2007, 20:18 +0100 schrieb Marc Poulhies:
> Package: gstreamer0.10-plugins-good
> Version: 0.10.6-3
> Severity: grave
>
> Trying to install the package returns:
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425656: fixed in libpam-encfs 0.1.4.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:52:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#446927: fixed in ghostscript 8.61.dfsg.1~svn8187-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:52:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#68: fixed in ghostscript 8.61.dfsg.1~svn8187-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:52:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#428055: fixed in ghostscript 8.61.dfsg.1~svn8187-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:52:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447188: fixed in ghostscript 8.61.dfsg.1~svn8187-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:52:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#428055: fixed in ghostscript 8.61.dfsg.1~svn8187-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:52:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#67: fixed in ghostscript 8.61.dfsg.1~svn8187-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:52:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#446825: fixed in ghostscript 8.61.dfsg.1~svn8187-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#438156: fixed in cdw 0.3.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Hi all,
good news from Harry,
he has fixed the licence problem with HtmlSax and HTMLSax3 in CVS of pear.
You can see it here: http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/pear/XML_HTMLSax/
regards,
Frank
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Frank Habermann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> good news from Harry,
>
> he has fixed the licence problem with HtmlSax and HTMLSax3 in CVS of pear.
> You can see it here: http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/pear/XML_HTMLSax/
All Harry did was switch to the PHP 3.0 license, which does nothing to
solve the licens
Same version, same arch. Works for me.
More information is probably required to track this down.
In the meantime, I guess this bug should be downgraded to important or
less since the software is usable (atleast by some).
--
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
Hello!
I've had a quick look at the bug you filed for double-free in gThumb.
Unfortunately I haven't been able to reproduce the problem.
It would be very helpful if you could gather some debugging info if you
can reliably reproduce this problem.
Here are some short help on how to build a debug ve
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#448151: fixed in gorm.app 1.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#442057: fixed in gorm.app 1.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
I noticed another peculiar thing.
> Starting gthumb 2.6.9 from xterm ...
Stable has 2.8.0-1, testing has 2.10.2-4, unstable has 2.10.5-2.
Is 2.6.9 a typo or is that the actual version number? If so, where did you get
that from?
Could you do "dpkg -l | grep gthumb" and send that output to the bu
Le Tuesday 30 October 2007 23:28:42 Michael Schultheiss, vous avez écrit :
> > he has fixed the licence problem with HtmlSax and HTMLSax3 in CVS of
> > pear. You can see it here:
> > http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/pear/XML_HTMLSax/
>
> All Harry did was switch to the PHP 3.0 license, which does noth
Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le Tuesday 30 October 2007 23:28:42 Michael Schultheiss, vous avez écrit :
> > > he has fixed the licence problem with HtmlSax and HTMLSax3 in CVS of
> > > pear. You can see it here:
> > > http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/pear/XML_HTMLSax/
> >
> > All Harry did was switch to th
Your message dated Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:02:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#448429: fixed in kipi-plugins 0.1.5~beta1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:03:56 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in new package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9
> found 441267 1.2-9
Bug#441267: refblas3_1.2-8.1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: test failures
Bug marked as found in version 1.2-9.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 442984 patch
Bug#442984: kvdr - FTBFS: kvdr.cpp:104: error: invalid conversion from 'int*'
to 'unsigned int*'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
tags 442984 patch
thanks
attched is a patch that fixes this issue.
stew
diff -ruN kvdr-0.64.orig/debian/patches/10_bad_pointer_cast.patch kvdr-0.64/debian/patches/10_bad_pointer_cast.patch
--- kvdr-0.64.orig/debian/patches/10_bad_pointer_cast.patch 1969-12-31 19:00:00.0 -0500
+++ kvdr-0.6
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 443358 important
Bug#443358: keeps on changing tunes
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> tags 443358 unreproducible
Bug#443358: keeps on changing tunes
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing h
severity 443358 important
tags 443358 unreproducible
thanks
Hello,
I just checked again the app and I can't reproduce the bug anymore with the same
version of the software.
--
Regards,
EddyP
=
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein
Your message dated Wed, 31 Oct 2007 05:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#436329: fixed in playmidi 2.4debian-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Hi Wolfgang,
Can you check if cdw version 0.3.2-1 crashes when you want to start it?
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libdevel-ebug-perl
Version: 0.48-1
Severity: serious
Your package fails to build from source (looks like missing build deps):
/usr/bin/make -C . OPTIMIZE="-g -Wall -O2" test
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/libdevel-ebug-perl-0.48'
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Com
Your message dated Wed, 31 Oct 2007 06:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#441696: fixed in aptitude 0.4.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 31 Oct 2007 06:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447960: fixed in aptitude 0.4.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 05:58:02PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Package: flutejava
> Version: 1.3-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> your package failed to build from source. The failure seems to appear on
> every architecture.
>
> | Automatic build of flutejava_1.3-2 on odin by sbuild/sparc
Your message dated Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:10:06 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed by a binNMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> I noticed another peculiar thing.
>
>> Starting gthumb 2.6.9 from xterm ...
>
> Stable has 2.8.0-1, testing has 2.10.2-4, unstable has 2.10.5-2.
>
> Is 2.6.9 a typo or is that the actual version number? If so, where did you
> get that from?
> Could you do "dpkg -l |
66 matches
Mail list logo
