On Friday 5 October 2007 14:07, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Fri, October 5, 2007 13:37, Toni Timonen wrote:
> > I can't send attachment either, and running PHP4. Downgrading back to
> > 1.4.10a-2 fixes the problem so something has happened on the way to
> > 1.4.11-1.
>
> Would it be an option for e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 427439 pending
Bug#427439: emboss: Binary name clash with other programs.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> severity 445688 important
Bug#445688: initramfs-tools: creates broken initramfs image
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 444970 important
Bug#444970: squirrelmail: Can't send attachment.
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
hi
please send us the output of 'mplayer -v -v -v file...'
(with both kernels if possible)
a.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: haskell-binary
version: 0.3-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building haskell-binary in haskell-bin
Package: opensaml
version: 1.1b-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
if /bin/sh ../libtool --silent --mode=compile --tag=CXX
Package: haskell-arrows
version: 0.2.1-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building haskell-arrows in haskell-a
Package: gfax
version: 0.7.6-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depe
Package: vic
version: 1:2.8ucl1.1.5-8
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
gcc -O2 -g -Wall -DUSE_NON_CONST -DVIC -c -o mallo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> severity 443053 serious
Bug#443053: FTBFS: multiple definitions
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Package: haskell-edison
version: 1.2.1-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building haskell-edison in haskell-e
Package: haskell-hlist
version: 2.0+darcs20070316-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building haskell-hlist in
Package: wbd
version: 1.0ucl4-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building wbd in wbd_1.0ucl4-5.dsc
debian/rul
Package: libasis-dev
version: 2005-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Hi,
libasis-dev is uninstallable:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libasis-dev: Depends: libgnatvsn-dev (>= 4.1) but it is not going to be
installed
E: Broken pack
Package: osgal-cvs
version: 20060903-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Bu
Package: m-tx
Version: 0.60-6
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007
hi,
while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
source for the following reason:
> or enter new name. (Default extension: sty)
>
> Enter file name:
> ! Emer
Package: asis
version: 2005-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depen
Package: gnat-glade
version: 2006-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build
Package: gnat-gps
version: 4.0.1-6
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-
Package: python-scipy
version: 0.6.0-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
python-scipy build-depends on:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.37.2), dpkg-dev (>= 1.13.19), dpatch,
python-all-dev, python-central (>= 0.5), p
Hi -releasers,
can you please schedule a binNMU for the source package gtkmathview on
amd64? Unfortunately I'm not entirely sure that it is the proper
solution, since I did not (also after talking with upstream et al) about
what was the cause of the crash, but we are quite convinced it was some
Package: netpanzer
Version: 0.8.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007
hi,
while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
source for the following reason:
> C++
> ./build/i486-pc-linux-gnu/opt/src/NetPanzer/Interfaces/KeyboardI
Package: sword
Version: 1.5.9-7
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007
hi,
while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
source for the following reason:
> checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
> checking whether to
Package: scummvm
Version: 0.10.0-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007
hi,
while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
source for the following reason:
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-amd64 i386 (x86_64)
> Toolchain package versions:
Package: cdd
Version: 0.4.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007
hi,
while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
source for the following reason:
> find . -name "*~" -exec /bin/rm -fr \{\} \;
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/buil
Package: rdesktop
Version: 1.5.0-2+cvs20071006
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When trying to connect to any machine (rdesktop -g 1280x1024 host), I
get a segfault.
Here's the last few lines from strace:
access("/usr/share/X11/locale/en_US.UTF-8/XLC_LOCALE", R_OK) = 0
open
Package: shibboleth-sp
Version: 1.3f.dfsg1-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007
hi,
while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
source for the following reason:
> checking whether svcfd_create is declared... no
> checking for
Package: rdesktop
Version: 1.5.0-2+cvs20071006
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Previous version in Debian/Lenny (1.5.0-2) worked without a flaw on
the same environment, so te bug has been introduced with the latest
commit.
Kind regards
R.
-- System Information:
Debian R
Package: amsn
Version: 0.97~rc1+dfsg1-5
Followup-For: Bug #444546
I am including the last of the strace output before the segmentation
fault:
lstat64("/usr/lib/tk8.4", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
stat64("/usr/lib/tk8.4/tkfbox.tcl", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644,
st_size=50358, ...})
Package: amsn
Version: 0.97~rc1+dfsg1-5
Followup-For: Bug #444546
I could change the fonts preference to any of the Bitstream Vera
varieties, but some of the Dejavu varieties like Dejavu mono caused a
segfault /-:
Is this an amsn problem, tcl/tk problem or what?
Arthur.
-- System Information
Package: amsn
Version: 0.97~rc1+dfsg1-5
Followup-For: Bug #444546
I did:
mv ~/.amsn ~/amsn_old
then re-ran:
amsn
and it started fine.
I compared the gconfig.xml in each directory and found that in the newly
created .msn directory, gconfig.xml contained:
basefont
Helvetica 11 n
found 438162 2.6-1
fixed 438162 2.6-2.1
thanks
Hi Raphael,
* Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-08 11:04]:
> reopen 438162 =
> tags 438162 etch
> thanks
>
> Package version in etch is 2.6-1 which is affected.
I closed this bug again, there is no need to keep it open,
that's what we h
Hi, sorry for the delay in replying - I was trying to
find time to test it thoroughly. Sounds like it's
fixed in the latest release anyway.
thanks!
--- Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le samedi 25 août 2007 à 17:02 +0100, Aidan Reilly a
> écrit :
> > Package: gdm
> > Version: 2.16
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 438162 2.6-1
Bug#438162: CVE-2007-4323: DenyHosts DoS vulnerability
Bug marked as found in version 2.6-1.
> fixed 438162 2.6-2.1
Bug#438162: CVE-2007-4323: DenyHosts DoS vulnerability
Bug marked as fixed in version 2.6-2.1.
> thanks
Stopping pro
Hi,
please also see:
http://dev.fckeditor.net/ticket/1325
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
pgp0NhvsNrL4w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Mon, 8 Oct 2007 11:11:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#438162: Reopening: package in etch is still vulnerable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Package: gstreamer0.10
Version: 0.10.14-2
Severity: serious
As the subject says: if I rebuild gstreamer0.10 and then use the resulting
packages to try to build gst-plugins-base0.10, I get:
...
mkdir -p /tmp/buildd/gst-plugins-base0.10-0.10.14/fake-home
GST_REGISTRY=/tmp/buildd/gst-plugins-base0.1
Package: openmx
version: 3.2.4.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Bui
Package: debmake
version: 3.8.3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
It also causes several other packages to FTBFS.
Relevant part:
make[1]:
Package: orbit2cpp
version: 1.3.9-2.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[5]: Entering directory `/build/user/orbit2cpp-1
Package: libcaca
version: 0.99.beta12.debian-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[4]: Entering directory `/build/user/li
Package: libkarma
version: 0.0.6-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building libkarma in libkarma_0.0.6-2.dsc
Package: gnome-subtitles
version: 0.6-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/
Package: dfo
version: 0.7+svn45-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building dfo in dfo_0.7+svn45-1.dsc
debian
Package: snd
version: 7.18-2.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depe
Package: zynaddsubfx
version: 2.2.1-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Bui
Package: icewm
version: 1.2.32-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
CXXyscrollbar.o
CXXybutton.o
CXXylistbo
Package: swh-plugins
version: 0.4.15-0.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Package: neon26
version: 0.26.4-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
checking for setsockopt... yes
checking for stpcpy... ye
Package: libxtm-perl
version: 0.37-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/build/user/lib
Package: libmoosex-getopt-perl
version: 0.05-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/perl Build test
t/000_load
Package: commons-io
version: 1.3.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `update-config'.
make
reassign 445787 dpkg-dev
thanks
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: debmake
> version: 3.8.3
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071007 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package fai
merge 443454 441951
thanks
Those are probably the same issues.
- Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#445777: fixed in cdd 0.4.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- Package-specific info:
Contents of /var/lib/x11/X.roster:
xserver-xorg
/etc/X11/X target does not match checksum in /var/lib/x11/X.md5sum.
X server symlink status:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 443454 441951
Bug#441951: icedove: When collecting email, it crashes.
Bug#443454: icedove: Dies when accessing settings dialog
Bug#441954: icedove: When collecting email, it crashes.
Merged 441951 441954 443454.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (08/10/2007):
> (gst-inspect-0.10:23471): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Unable to create ~/.gnome2
> directory: Permission denied
> /usr/bin/dh_gstscancodecs: gst-inspect-0.10 failed on
> debian/gstreamer0.10-gnomevfs/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstgnomevfs.so: 65280
>
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#445767: fixed in m-tx 0.60-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Package: aiccu
Version: 20070115-3~bpo.2+b1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
I know, this is an unsupported backport. Anyways ..
The file /etc/aiccu.conf containing login and password is
world readable. The security problem is obvious.
Sebastian
-- System Inf
Hi,
Thanks for the bug report. I should obsolete this package because
it has been replaced with
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?packages=osgal
I'm not sure how to do that. Do you have an idea ?
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: osgal-cvs
> version:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 445787 dpkg-dev
Bug#445787: debmake: debstd: Can't locate controllib.pl
Bug reassigned from package `debmake' to `dpkg-dev'.
> forcemerge 441359 445787
Bug#441359: 822-date can't locate controllib.pl
Bug#445787: debmake: debstd: Can't locate c
reassign 445787 dpkg-dev
forcemerge 441359 445787
thanks
> > Can't locate controllib.pl in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl
> > /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.8 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5
> > /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8
> > /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at /usr/b
Privet Anton!
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:46:35 +0700 AntonSerov wrote:
> Justification: renders package unusable
Why? Here it works fine without type1.
Regards
Evgeni
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 445815 20070115-3~bpo.2+b1
Bug#445815: aiccu: configuration file world readable (containing password and
login)
Bug no longer marked as found in version 20070115-3~bpo.2+b1.
> tags 445815 - security
Bug#445815: aiccu: configuration file world
notfound 445815 20070115-3~bpo.2+b1
tags 445815 - security
thanks
Dear security team,
please ignore this issue, thanks.
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 12:57:29PM +0200, Sebastian Niehaus wrote:
> I know, this is an unsupported backport. Anyways ..
Thanks, but no, this is not supported through the BTS,
Hi,
I'm also forwarding this mail to the bug report I got regarding this
problem, just to keep track of it.
> Does refocus always segfault, or only from times to times? I have seen
> intermittent segfaults with refocus in the past (I don't get that
> anymore now), but never reproducible segfault
Could someone prepare update for unrar-nonfree to next etch point
release fixing security issues?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 8 Oct 2007 13:57:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#445808: File libtype1.so is NOT included in
xserver-xorg-core package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 445582 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#445582: ldapscripts shows passwords in the clear on the command line
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
forwarded 445582 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
FYI:
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 03:54:43AM +, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Package: ldapscripts
> Severity: serious
> Version: 1.4-2
> Tag: security
>
> Unless you're running grsecurity or some other patched kernel, the
> following cannot be good:
>
> _chang
Package: multipath-tools
Version: 0.4.7-1.1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
The script /etc/rcS.d/S03multipath-tools-boot creates devices in
/dev/mapper/ (per udev rule), but /dev/mapper/ does not exist at that
time. The directory is created by /etc/rcS.d/S25li
On 08/10/07 at 13:01 +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>Thanks for the bug report. I should obsolete this package because
> it has been replaced with
>
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?packages=osgal
>
>I'm not sure how to do that. Do you have an idea ?
Hi Loic,
Hi,
> The issue may appear in other places in your code (there is e.g. some
> unsafe seds calls). Though I must say I don't really know how to fix
> this minimally.
my non-debian man page says:
-y passwdfile
Use complete contents of passwdfile as the password for simple
authentication.
That and
Package: apertium-fr-ca
Version: 0.7-1
Severity: serious
Looking at apertium-fr-ca debian/control:
Build-Depends: ... libapertium-1.0-0-dev (>= 1.0.1)
Which no longer exists after upload of apertium 3.0.1-1.
--
"rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Oops, disregard my previous message. Seems like I was a bit trigger happy
and mixed it up with the -T parameter?
-T newPasswdFile
Set the new password to the contents of newPasswdFile.
I managed to confuse myself right
now and I'm not even sure if any of these params are OK at all. So better
don
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s5.9.3
Thanks for the advice.
I've already uploaded osgal with the proper Replace + Conflict. It
is unclear if filing a "removal request" on ftp.debian.org will remove
*all* instances
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 12:33:06PM +, Stefan Cornelius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > The issue may appear in other places in your code (there is e.g. some
> > unsafe seds calls). Though I must say I don't really know how to fix
> > this minimally.
>
> my non-debian man page says:
> -y passwdfile
> Use
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:20:26AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
>
> please send us the output of 'mplayer -v -v -v file...'
> (with both kernels if possible)
I don't think megabytes of log files are really helpful. I never found
more than a single -v useful.
Diego
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
I initially get a loginscreen and can login and work normally untill 'enter'
is hit, doesn't seem to matter where or when I hit it: any enter causes a
segfault.
--
Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: egroupware
Version: 1.4.002.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
This is a note to the public wondering why egroupware 1.4 is in
experimental.
The following are major problems compared to 1.2:
- There is no migration path from the old LDAP addressbook to the new
one.
- Addressbook ACLs change me
Package: metamail
Version: 2.7-52
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Using mailto on all our x86_64 machines fails with the error:
mailto: Error writing to splitmail: No such file or directory
Wrote draft to ~/dead.letter
Some digging learned that mailto calls splitmail and
reassign 440721 cpp-4.2
thanks
AFAICS is it a compiler bug.
It is also in version 4.1
With gcc version 4.0 I was able to build the package.
cpp-4.2 is chosen as the assign package,
because it provides the /usr/lib/gcc/sparc-linux-gnu/4.2.1 directory.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 440721 cpp-4.2
Bug#440721: FTBFS on sparc while linking usr/klibc/libc.so
Bug reassigned from package `klibc' to `cpp-4.2'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: irssi
Version: 0.8.10-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-orphan
Hi,
Your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its
maintainer, because:
* no upload for more than a year
* a new upstream release available for half a year
* several bug
On 08/10/07 at 15:12 +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s5.9.3
>
> Thanks for the advice.
>
> I've already uploaded osgal with the proper Replace + Conflict. It
> is unclear if filing a
reassign 440721 klibc
stop
don't mess with my bugs!
over and out
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 440721 klibc
Bug#440721: FTBFS on sparc while linking usr/klibc/libc.so
Bug reassigned from package `cpp-4.2' to `klibc'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
0.8.12 is being worked on and should be uploaded this week.
--
David Pashley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi Roberto,
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:02:00AM +0200, Roberto Oppedisano wrote:
> Previous version in Debian/Lenny (1.5.0-2) worked without a flaw on
> the same environment, so te bug has been introduced with the latest
> commit.
the current rdesktop version from unstable also doesnt quite work
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> only the unstable + testing ones, according to an answer on
> #debian-release.
>
> removals from stable only happen for very special cases (like a huge
> license violation).
Great many thanks. I wrote to ftp.debian.org
Cheers,
--
+33 1 76 60 72
Your message dated Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:49:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line scummvm - FTBFS: You need to run ./configure before you can
run make
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Output from "mplayer -v file > out.txt" on old (2.6.18-4) kernel:
MPlayer 1.0rc1-4.1.3-DFSG-free (C) 2000-2006 MPlayer Team
AltiVec found
CPU: PowerPC
get_path('codecs.conf') -> '/home/sean/.mplayer/codecs.conf'
Reading /home/sean/.mplayer/codecs.conf: Can't open '/home/
sean/.mplayer/codecs.con
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 445148 serious
Bug#445148: S390: Build w/ /boot partition succeeds, but re-boot fails in fsck
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> reassign 445148 debian-installer 20070308
Bug#445148: S390: Build w/ /boot partition succeeds, but re-bo
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 02:57:42PM +, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:10:21 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote
>
> Hi Pierre,
>
> > > Unless you're running grsecurity or some other patched kernel, the
> > > following cannot be good:
> > >
> > > $LDAPPASSWDBIN -w "$BINDPWD" -D
Package: azureus
Version: 2.5.0.4-1
Followup-For: Bug #445635
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=
I get the same yellow-instead-of-grey as the previously posted
screenshot when I connect to Windows XP.
Haven't yet run into a segfault, but left mouse-button clicks seems to
be ignored (right works fine) so my hands are pretty tied by that.
Everything worked fine in previous version.
rdesktop out
Hi,
This bug is still present on mips platform. It triggers a build
failure
for Pigment package which depends on it. See
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=pigment&ver=0.3.1-2&arch=mips&stamp=1191269708&file=log
Philippe
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:00:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#445835: fixed in metamail 2.7-53
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
