Hi all!
In June 2007 (and before) we tried to chase down the authors of those
two file. According to several web sites it seems to be Nicolas
Kisselhoff (of whom we hope to reach him at [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Did any of you succeeded in getting into contact? Any progress on this
bug?
Best wishes
N
Package: gnash
Version: 0.8.1~rc.070818-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
debian/copyright says Gnash is licensed under GPLv2 (which is no longer true),
and refers to common-licenses/GPL without a versioned dependency on base-files
that would assure that file is v3.
Patch attached.
-- System Infor
merge 356853 363061
thanks
Hi all,
I am a bit sick of the RC bugs, so let's try to eliminate them:
texlive-lang:
#368968: tetex-base: License violation in csplain
#439028: non-free files in texlive
both will be fixed by the next upload I will do today
texlive-ex
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 431494 texlive-base-bin
Bug#431494: fails to install
Bug reassigned from package `jadetex' to `texlive-base-bin'.
> close 431494 2007-13
Bug#431494: fails to install
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug
reassign 431494 texlive-base-bin
close 431494 2007-13
thanks
That was a bug in texlive-base-bin, I reassign and close this bug.
Best wishes
Norbert
---
Dr. Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Vienna University o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 356853 texlive-latex-base
Bug#356853: Contains files without any license statement
Bug reassigned from package `tetex-extra' to `texlive-latex-base'.
> merge 356853 363061
Bug#356853: Contains files without any license statement
Bug#363061: Co
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 08:47:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368968: fixed in texlive-lang 2007.dfsg.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 08:47:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439028: fixed in texlive-lang 2007.dfsg.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Package: rbot
Version: 0.9.10-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
rbot does not start. I get the configuration wizard, but after asking
the questions and "officializing" the configuration, it stops. Each
subsequent invocation stops also.
Here is the rbot.log it leaves (at f
Package: libpango1.0-0
Version: 1.18.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I guess it could be rather a libgtk issue. I realized
a similar error in the last release of gimp2.4.
iceweasel opens pango and inmediately crashes:
# iceweasel
/usr/lib/iceweasel/firefox-bin: symbol
# grep open strace_output.txt|grep -v iceweasel|grep -v
my_user_name|grep lib|grep -v mozilla|cat -n
1 open("/lib/libncurses.so.5", O_RDONLY) = 3
2 open("/lib/libdl.so.2", O_RDONLY) = 3
3 open("/lib/libc.so.6", O_RDONLY)= 3
4 open("/usr/lib/locale/locale-arc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> package gnugk
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gnugk
> tags 440810 + pending
Bug#440810: gnugk: postinst failure (preinst called with unknown argument
`configure')
There were no tags
Your message dated Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:47:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#441028: filtered strace's output
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007, Francisco Yuste Garcia wrote:
> I guess it could be rather a libgtk issue. I realized
> a similar error in the last release of gimp2.4.
>
> iceweasel opens pango and inmediately crashes:
> # iceweasel
> /usr/lib/iceweasel/firefox-bin: symbol lookup error:
> /usr/lib/libpango
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440810: fixed in gnugk 2:2.2.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440855: fixed in gnugk 2:2.2.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: btanks
Version: 0.5.4740-2
Yes, that's the thing. Upgrading to 7.0.1-2 solved the problem.
--
/-Powered by Debian--<< |< |/| -|- >>-\
| http://knt.smrod.org/ ~ Reg.Linux User: 300900 |
| FLUG, CK-LUG member~Member of CKSS, a polish
Hi,
there is a patch which should fix the build problem. It is
on: http://bereshit.synflood.at/~ak/ircii-pana-fix.diff
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
pgptc2HD1Qrg4.
Package: apertium
Version: 1.0.3-3
Severity: serious
apertium fails to install because its dependency on liblttoolbox-1.0-0
cannot be satisfied:
# apt-get install apertium
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not
Package: ant
Version: 1.7.0-3
Severity: serious
ant fails to compile because it cannot build ant-jsch.jar:
Warning: skipping jar archive /tmp/buildd/ant-1.7.0/build/lib/ant-jsch.jar
because no files were included.
Warning: skipping jar archive /tmp/buildd/ant-1.7.0/build/lib/ant-jsch.jar
beca
What is the status of this bug, i can verify that the patch provided by
Roland works properly on all of my systems.
--
Chris
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 11:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440671: fixed in gfpoken 0.30-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:46:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Considering this being no problem anymore
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> found 440144 2.6.21-6
Bug#440144: linux-libc-dev: missing definition of rdtscl [linux-kernel-headers
regression]
Bug marked as found in version 2.6.21-6.
> severity 440144 important
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440889: fixed in gforge 4.6.99+svn6086-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> found 431494 2007-8
Bug#431494: fails to install
Bug marked as found in version 2007-8.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> # not a bug in this package
> severity 440727 important
Bug#440727: FTBFS on sparc in clean target
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing he
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440195: fixed in grep 2.5.3~dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439827: fixed in grep 2.5.3~dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440342: fixed in grep 2.5.3~dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440342: fixed in grep 2.5.3~dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440195: fixed in grep 2.5.3~dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440195: fixed in grep 2.5.3~dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439827: fixed in grep 2.5.3~dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440342: fixed in grep 2.5.3~dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440195: fixed in grep 2.5.3~dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440342: fixed in grep 2.5.3~dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439827: fixed in grep 2.5.3~dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440342: fixed in grep 2.5.3~dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439827: fixed in grep 2.5.3~dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439827: fixed in grep 2.5.3~dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440195: fixed in grep 2.5.3~dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: tracker
Version: 0.6.2-1
Severity: grave
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
After upgrading tracker today, two bad effects:
1) The daemon is consuming a lot of memory.
2) Any search returns no results.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-
Hi!
Do you think you can mark this bug as pending? This is, since the
patch seems to work, and only an upload is needed.
Thanks!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
severity 441025 normal
thanks
Coin,
In fact, i should update the README.Debian, which is obsolete. In the
past, you had to copy the template files manually, but now the rbot
wizard does everything for you.
I don't know how you created the bot directory, but i guess you just did
a mkdir without
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 441025 normal
Bug#441025: rbot: crash during each execution, including first one.
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
$ ldd /usr/lib/iceweasel/firefox-bin
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
libmozjs.so => not found
libxpcom.so => not found
libxpcom_core.so => not found
libplc4.so.0d => /usr/lib/libplc4.so.0d (0xb7f5c000)
libnspr4.so.0d => /usr/lib/libnspr4.so.0d (0xb7f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 441062 important
Bug#441062: No results at all after upgrade!!
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
severity 441062 important
thanks
David schrieb:
> Package: tracker
> Version: 0.6.2-1
> Severity: grave
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
>
> After upgrading tracker today, two bad effects:
>
> 1) The daemon is consuming a lot of memory.
> 2) Any search returns no results.
>
Package: libimage-size-ruby
Version: 1:0.1.1-1
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
fakeroot debian/rules binary
test -x debian/rules
test "`id -u`" = 0
dh_clean -k
dh_installdirs -A
mkdir -p "."
dh_installdirs -plibimage-size-ruby1.8
#mkdir -p
/tmp/buildd/libimage-size-ruby-0.1.1/
a
98-farm
| Build started at 20070906-1545
| **
| Checking available source versions...
| Fetching source files...
| Reading package lists...
| Building dependency tree...
| Reading state information...
| Need to get 19.7
Package: kaffe
Version: 2:1.1.7-4
Severity: serious
Because ecj-bootstrap has been removed from sid, neither kaffe-pthreads nor
kaffe-jthreads is installable anymore.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package tomcat5.5
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: tomcat5.5
> severity 396170 serious
Bug#396170: tomcat5.5 depends on ecj-bootstrap
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> In June 2007 (and before) we tried to chase down the authors of those
> two file. According to several web sites it seems to be Nicolas
> Kisselhoff (of whom we hope to reach him at [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
>
> Did any of you succeeded in gettin
>> Furthermore, in light of comments on the debian list, I just
>> disallowed --editor-cmd, --diff-cmd, and --config-dir... but that still
>> doesn't help with the editor cmd and diff cmd being specified in config
>> files.
--diff3-cmd is problematic, too. For rsync, you need to disable
daemon
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have merged them and discussion will continue on 356853.
Good.
> Frank did a recollection in April, coming down to
>
> * bbm fonts [OPEN]
> Frank mentioned that there is something on the way via Karl Berry
> is there any progress?
No i
Could you check that your soundcard is not managed by the alsa
snd-ice1724 driver ? There are reports of wine freezing the computer
when this driver is used.
If so as a temporary workaround you can
move /usr/lib/wine/wineoss.drv.so somewhere else and run winecfg to
choose alsa in the sound section.
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 10:46:47AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> We (David Miller and I) are already working on this. We finally got some
> info dump from a debugging patched kernel and I expect we will have a fix
> within the next 3/4 weeks.
> >From our first look it s
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:41:35PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 10:46:47AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > It is also worth checking with .23-rcX since it has been reported to be
> > working.
>
> lebrun.d.o exploded again after a few hours of building under 2.6.23-
Package: g-wrap
Version: 1.9.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 8.1
apt-get upgrade installs g-wrap 1.9.9 but "holds back" guile-g-wrap. This
is due to libgwrap-runtime transitioning from SONAME 0 to 2.
However, because of a change in the contents of g-wrap, even upgrading
g-wrap without
reassign 441049 jsch 0.1.34-1
thanks
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 04:42:29AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Package: ant
> Version: 1.7.0-3
> Severity: serious
>
> ant fails to compile because it cannot build ant-jsch.jar:
>
> Warning: skipping jar archive /tmp/buildd/ant-1.7.0/build/lib/ant-jsch.jar
>
Your message dated Thu, 6 Sep 2007 21:53:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439226: CVE-2007-4462: arbitrary files overwriting
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On Don, 06 Sep 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> > * bbm fonts [OPEN]
> > Frank mentioned that there is something on the way via Karl Berry
> > is there any progress?
>
> No idea, heard nothing.
Ok, should be tracked.
> > * concmath [CLOSED???]
[..]
> bug report of tetex-doc about fontinst doc
Your message dated Thu, 06 Sep 2007 20:47:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440966: fixed in util-linux 2.13-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: expect
Version: 5.43.0-11
Severity: serious
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=expect&ver=5.43.0-13&arch=ia64&stamp=1189059160&file=log
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/build/buildd/goplay-0.1'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20070906-1437
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
g directory `/build/buildd/cacao-0.98/src'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cacao-0.98'
> make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cacao-0.98'
> make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build]
Package: libpam-mount
Version: 0.20-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of libpam-mount_0.20-1 on debian-31.osdl.marist.edu by
> sbuild/s390 98
[...]
> Building dependency tree...
> E: Couldn't find package libhx-dev
> apt-get failed.
2-ocaml-dev missing files
> (usr/lib/ocaml/3.10.0/lablgtk2/*.cmx), aborting
> make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1
> ******
> Build finished at 20070906-1031
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o such file or
> directory
> **
> Build finished at 20070906-2324
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ender//0064.png': No
> such file or directory.
> make[1]: *** [png/marbles.png] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gfpoken-0.30'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> **
> Bu
ools/usr/lib/kexec-tools-testing/kexec_test':
> No such file or directory
> make: *** [install] Error 1
> **
> Build finished at 20070906-1724
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
tags 435983 help moreinfo
retitle 435983 please add udev rules to make mdadm register /dev/disk symlinks
thanks
also sprach Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.11.1829 +0200]:
> mount dropped its own code to parse LABEL= and UUID= and now uses the
> persistent names created by udev.
> The lv
* Wed 2007-08-22 Rob Browning INBOX
> Jari Aalto writes:
>
>> Setting up emacs22 (22.1+1-1) ...
>> emacs-install emacs22
>> emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor emacs22
>> emacsen-common: byte-compiling for emacs22
>> /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/emacsen-common: line 44:
Your message dated Fri, 07 Sep 2007 01:04:07 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#435961: emacs22: segmentation fault during install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Hello:
Could you please try upgrading to latest bochs sid packages just to test that
this is not a duplicate of #417416
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=417416)
Thanks.
--
Raúl Sánchez Siles
->Proud Debian user<-
Linux registered user #416098
signature.asc
Desc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> tags 441089 sid
Bug#441089: kaffe: Uninstallable in sid
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfixed 438792 1.4.2.dfsg-5
Bug#438792: FTBFS on sparc with bus error
Bug no longer marked as fixed in version 1.4.2.dfsg-5.
> notfixed 439976 1.4.2.dfsg-5
Bug#439976: FTBFS on mips in test/srtp_driver.c:315
Bug no longer marked as fixed in version 1.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 306305 pending
Bug#306305: mpich-bin: doesn't remove alternatives correctly
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 392129 pending
Bug#392129: pioneers-client: default theme is co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 433510 + patch
Bug#433510: Local changes to /etc/default/mailgraph are overwritten
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> # argl, forgot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> tags 432421 + patch
Bug#432421: ossp-uuid: FTBFS: unmet build dep php4-dev
Tags were: sid lenny
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping proces
tags 433510 + patch
thanks
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:31:19 -0700, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> We set MAIL_LOG=/var/log/maillog in /etc/default/mailgraph and upgraded.
> The local change was ignored and set to the value stored in debconf.
> This took down mailgraph for two days. Unhappiness ensued. Plea
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 441147 kaffe 2:1.1.7-4
Bug#441147: Uninstallable due to dependency on virtual package ecj-bootstrap
Bug reassigned from package `kaffe-pthreads' to `kaffe'.
> merge 441147 441089
Bug#441089: kaffe: Uninstallable in sid
Bug#441147: Uninstallabl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 396170 pending
Bug#396170: tomcat5.5 depends on ecj-bootstrap
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1:1.4.6-1
Severity: serious
avr-libc fails to build from source because it cannot run pdflatex:
pdflatex refman.tex
make[5]: pdflatex: Command not found
make[5]: *** [refman.pdf] Error 127
It does not build-depend on texlive-latex-base, which contains
pdflatex in si
reassign 441147 kaffe 2:1.1.7-4
merge 441147 441089
tag 441147 pending
tag 441089 pending
thanks
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 10:11:12PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Package: kaffe-pthreads
> Version: 2:1.1.7-4
> Severity: serious
>
> kaffe-pthreads fails to install because it depends on the virtual
> p
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 08:46:43AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> What was the reason for that, anyway?
>
> You can't change mutexes without changing the environment layout (data
> structure sizes change), and to make matters worse, this is not
> checked by the library.
The OpenLDAP people were m
Package: clamfs
Version: 0.9.1-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070905
hi,
while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
source for the following reason:
> make[3]: Entering directory `/build/user/clamfs-0.9.1/src'
> if i486-linux
Package: glchess
Version: 1.0+debian-1
Severity: serious
glchess can't be installed atm:
Setting up glchess (1.0+debian-1) ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/sbin/update-python-modules", line 294, in ?
process(basedir,install_modules(py_installed))
File "/usr/sbin/update-py
Package: asio
Version: 0.3.8~rc3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
asio fails to build from source because it cannot find the header
files provided by libboost-dev, libboost-date-time-dev,
libboost-regex-dev, and libboost-test-dev. The attached patch adds
these packages to its build-dependencies so
Package: libdb4.4
Version: 4.4.20-9
Severity: grave
Justification: totally breaks postgrey
(don't hesitate to shoot back if it turns out that postgrey or
libberkeleydb-perl is using libdb4.4 the wrong way :-)
See #441069: txn_begin seems to fail with 4.4.20-9. Downgrading to 4.4.20-8
makes the
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 09:25:51AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> reassign 441147 kaffe 2:1.1.7-4
> merge 441147 441089
> tag 441147 pending
> tag 441089 pending
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 10:11:12PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > Package: kaffe-pthreads
> > Version: 2:1.1.7-4
> > Severity:
Package: kaffe-pthreads
Version: 2:1.1.7-4
Severity: serious
kaffe-pthreads fails to install because it depends on the virtual
package ecj-bootstrap:
# apt-get install kaffe-pthreads
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 08:06:35AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> See #441069: txn_begin seems to fail with 4.4.20-9. Downgrading to 4.4.20-8
> makes the problem go away (doesn't matter which version the database was
> created with.)
Yes, someone should revert the mutex change.
--
To UNSU
Package: bibletime
Version: 1.6.4.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070905
hi,
while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
source for the following reason:
> checking for libjpeg... -ljpeg
> checking for perl... /usr/bin/per
Package: cairo-ocaml
Version: 20070306-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070905
hi,
while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
source for the following reason:
> ml_cairo_bigarr.c:13: warning: its scope is only this definition or
Package: bacula-doc
Version: 2.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
bacula-doc fails to build from source because it cannot run autoconf:
cd /tmp/buildd/bacula-doc-2.2.0/debian/tmp-build/autoconf && autoconf
/bin/sh: autoconf: command not found
make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 127
The attache
tag 396170 pending
thanks
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 01:11:48PM -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> package tomcat5.5
> severity 396170 serious
> thanks
>
> As the subject says: since ecj-bootstrap has been removed from sid, tomcat5.5
> is no longer installable.
I'm working on this.
Cheers,
Michael
Package: 9base
Version: 1:2-7
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070905
hi,
while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
source for the following reason:
> CC unsharp.c
> CC wait.c
> CC waitpid.c
> AR lib9
> built lib9
> make[2]:
* Clint Adams:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 11:04:19PM +0200, Francois Lorrain wrote:
>> I had to downgrade libdb4.2 from 4.2.52+dfsg-3 to dfsg-2.1 otherwise
>> Cyrus2.2 and slapd would not read their own databases ...
>
> Somebody should probably revert the mutex change.
What was the reason for th
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
