Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 439480 +patch
Bug#439480: doc-debian-uk: FTBFS: debiandoc2latexps: one or more used LaTeX
typesetting styles not found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 09:33:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FTBFS (Catalan patches applied in wrong order)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
tags 439480 +patch
thanks
I have managed to get this bug fixed by supplying the right
Build-Depends for the TeXLive packages. Please see the patch attached.
HTH.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
diff -urN doc-debian-uk-0.0.2006
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 439515 important
Bug#439515: kdelibs4-dev: Missing Replaces on kdelibs4c2a
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
up to now my system is fully upgraded and the problem with
kstartupconfig remains. the version of the package is 4:3.5.7.dfsg.1-5.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i can confirm this bug. i get freezes constantly with 100.14.11, but
none at all with 100.14.09. this is on 2.6.22-1-amd64
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 439483 by 439469
Bug#439469: missing G_END_DECLS in gimpcolorprofilestore.h causes FTBFSes
Bug#439483: gimp-texturize: FTBFS: block.h:101: error: template with C linkage
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 439483 added: 439469, 439473
>
block 439483 by 439469
thanks
This bug is caused by the breakage of libglib2.0-dev, as given in
#439469.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
unblock 439483 by 439469
reassign 439483 libgimp2.0-dev
forcemerge 439469 439483
thanks
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 02:27:44PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> block 439483 by 439469
> thanks
>
> This bug is caused by the breakage of libglib2.0-dev, as given in
> #439469.
A closer look and a recompilat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unblock 439483 by 439469
Bug#439469: missing G_END_DECLS in gimpcolorprofilestore.h causes FTBFSes
Bug#439483: gimp-texturize: FTBFS: block.h:101: error: template with C linkage
Was blocked by: 439469 439473
Blocking bugs of 439483 removed: 439469, 4394
Package: snort
Version: 2.7.0-3
Severity: grave
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 439469 +patch
Bug#439469: missing G_END_DECLS in gimpcolorprofilestore.h causes FTBFSes
There were no tags set.
Bug#439473: libgimp2.0-dev: #include fails with g++
Bug#439483: gimp-texturize: FTBFS: block.h:101: error: template with C linkage
Tags
tags 439469 +patch
thanks
Hi!
I just happened to run on to this bug, and had already prepared a
patch, just as mentioned in the earlier mails. I would like to confirm
that this (very small) patch, as Bryan mentions, seems to solve the
problem.
HTH.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
I
2007/8/25, Christoph Pfister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Most of the dependencies were turned into "Recommends:" beginning with
> > > version 1.1.7-2. This renders the package unusable for almost
> > > (possibly that there's exception; but I can't imagine any) every user
> > > of the library; excep
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:29:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:29:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:43:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in gjdoc-0.7.8-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:43:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in gjdoc-0.7.8-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:43:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in gjdoc-0.7.8-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:43:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in gjdoc-0.7.8-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:43:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in gjdoc-0.7.8-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:43:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in gjdoc-0.7.8-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:43:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in gjdoc-0.7.8-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 10:54:20 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439348: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
forwarded 439264 http://bugs.kde.org/149226
thanks
Hi Tom,
I forwarded your bug report to the K3b main developer. Feel free to visit
the KDE bug tracker directly to discuss your problems directly with
Sebastian.
Thanks for taking the time to report this, it looks quite serious.
Francois
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 439264 http://bugs.kde.org/149226
Bug#439264: k3b: Hangs the System by irritating DVD-Readers (IDE-DMA/IRQ Storm)
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://bugs.kde.org/149226.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 11:25:07AM +0200, Hans wrote:
> ///usr/lib/snort_dynamicengine/libsf_engine.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
I'm not a library expert, but this bug looks like the libsf_engine.so was
built as a 32bit library, which cannot be loaded into a 64bit program. Could
you please also
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 11:25:07AM +0200, Hans wrote:
> Dear maintainers,
>
> on my AMD64 X2 system the latest version inhibits to start. It is looking
> like an dependency or lib related problem.
It looks like the libraries that snort needs to use are not compiled properly
in ADM64's autobuilde
Package: netmrg
Version: 0.19-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on all 64 bit arches with the following
error:
checking whether NLS is requested... yes
checking for GNU gettext in libc... no
checking for iconv... yes
checking for GNU gettext in libintl... no
checking whethe
Package: softgun
Version: 0.16-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
rfbserver.c:46:18: error: zlib.h: No such file or directory
rfbserver.c:137: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before
'z_stream'
rfbserver.c: In function 'rfbsrv_disconnect':
r
Package: xdelta3
Version: 0q.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
ld -shared xdelta3.o xdelta3_wrap.o -o xdelta3module.so
/usr/lib/libpython2.4.so -lc
ld: xdelta3.o: relocation R_X86_64_32S against `a local symbol' can not be used
when making a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 439550 pending
Bug#439550: libmtp6: trying to overwrite `/etc/udev/rules.d/libmtp.rules',
which is also in package libmtp5
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> severity 439357 normal
Bug#439357: xserver-xorg: X server faild-no usable configuration
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> reassign 439357 xserver-xorg-core
Bug#439357: xserver-
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:46:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line python-central: errors installing python-xml (on arm)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 11:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439550: fixed in libmtp 0.2.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Am Sonntag 26 August 2007 schrieb Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña:
> file /usr/lib/snort_dynamicengine/libsf_engine.so.0.0.0
Hi Javier,
thank you for your fast response.
This is my output. Please take a look:
---
1.
protheus2:/home/ullhan63#
file /usr/lib/snort_dynamicengine/libsf_
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#438511: fixed in centerim 4.22.1-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:51:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line binNMU dependencies fixed in 2.5-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: gnomesword
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
libclucene0 have been renamed to libclucene0ldbl , but the package have not yet
updated the dependency
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:46:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcj-4.1 - FTBFS: Broken recursive build-deps
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 439640 serious
Bug#439640: libgnutls13: latest version breaks mutt with imaps
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439464: fixed in regina-normal 4.3.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> notfound 439640 1.7.16-1
Bug#439640: libgnutls13: latest version breaks mutt with imaps
Bug no longer marked as found in version 1.7.16-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
On 2007-08-26 Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: libgnutls13
[...]
> I just apt-get upgraded and in the process installed libgnutls13
> 1.7.18-2. Afterwards I had to find out that mutt doesn't work anymore.
[...]
The breakage happened in the 1.7.16 to 1.7.17 step.
cu andreas
--
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
Version: 1.0.76-2
Severity: serious
# apt-get install java-gcj-compat-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> found 439640 1.7.18-1
Bug#439640: libgnutls13: latest version breaks mutt with imaps
Bug marked as found in version 1.7.18-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Rene Engelhard writes:
> Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
> Version: 1.0.76-2
> Severity: serious
looks like a newbie gone wild and filing bug reports without looking
into NEW first.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 14:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#434254: fixed in ipsvd 0.13.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Hi,
> I will get back with a security report this evening.
Any news? :)
Cheers
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
pgpatS1wR4LDD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Rene Engelhard writes:
> > Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
> > Version: 1.0.76-2
> > Severity: serious
>
> looks like a newbie gone wild and filing bug reports without looking
> into NEW first.
Irrelevant.
a) I am not a newbie. I just know it's not installable *now* and
ther
On 2007-08-26 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-08-26 Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: libgnutls13
> [...]
>> I just apt-get upgraded and in the process installed libgnutls13
>> 1.7.18-2. Afterwards I had to find out that mutt doesn't work anymore.
> [...]
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 04:13:35PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2007-08-26 Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: libgnutls13
> [...]
> > I just apt-get upgraded and in the process installed libgnutls13
> > 1.7.18-2. Afterwards I had to find out that mutt doesn't work anymore.
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 04:19:14PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> > I will get back with a security report this evening.
>
> Any news? :)
> Cheers
> Nico
>
> --
> Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
> For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 e
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 04:19:14PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> > I will get back with a security report this evening.
>
> Any news? :)
> Cheers
> Nico
>
> --
> Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
> For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> notfound 439670 1.0.76-2
Bug#439670: depends on non-existing version of ecj-gcj
Bug no longer marked as found in version 1.0.76-2.
> found 439670 1.0.76-5
Bug#439670: depends on non-
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:53:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#436382: loop-aes: FTBFS: unmet b-dep linux-support-2.6.21-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> forwarded 439640
> http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-dev/2007-August/001859.html
Bug#439640: libgnutls13: latest version breaks mutt with imaps
Noted your statement that Bug ha
Hi Stanislav,
> Somewhere inFlightDnsQueries becomes NULL but dnsTimeoutHandler called
> anyway and it then calls removeQuery.
> But I can't find in which case this condition might happened.
I've received this same bug report from somebody running 1.0.1, so it
looks like indeed there's a problem
On 2007-08-26 Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 04:13:35PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> On 2007-08-26 Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Package: libgnutls13
>> [...]
>>> I just apt-get upgraded and in the process installed libgnutls13
>>> 1.7.18-2.
Hi,
* Martin Loschwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-26 16:49]:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 04:19:14PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > I will get back with a security report this evening.
> >
> > Any news? :)
> gosh, wait a second. out of these reports, quite some only affect the
> versions starting f
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:17:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439656: fixed in xdelta3 0q.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#433225: fixed in silgraphite2.0 1:2.2.0-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 423835 +pending
Bug#423835: debian-cd: Incorrect md5sum for Packages.gz files in Release file
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> tags 425600 +pending
Bug#425600: debian-cd: should include "local" packages when checking for
base_installable
Ta
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431162: fixed in po4a 0.32-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> no, I don't care anymore about "delays" in NEW after having to wait
> about 12 or 13 days for a new binary with the last gcj-4.2 upload. If
> ftp-masters did make the decision that new binary packages have to
> land in NEW, then they should process them in time. What do
Rene Engelhard writes:
> Hi,
>
> Matthias Klose wrote:
> > no, I don't care anymore about "delays" in NEW after having to wait
> > about 12 or 13 days for a new binary with the last gcj-4.2 upload. If
> > ftp-masters did make the decision that new binary packages have to
> > land in NEW, then they
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#438608: fixed in streamripper 1.62.2a-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
As part of my NM application I am asked to fix an RC bug. I would like
to go with this one, which is open for quite some time.
If I am able to work it out, I will prepare a patch. I will also prepare
an NMU (as part of my NM task), so if you'd like the fix can probably be
NMUed.
Regards Ben
--
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Rene Engelhard writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > no, I don't care anymore about "delays" in NEW after having to wait
> > > about 12 or 13 days for a new binary with the last gcj-4.2 upload. If
> > > ftp-masters did make the decision that new binary pa
Package: linux86
Version: 0.16.17-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following error:
cc -O -c -o elks.o elks.c
elks.c:18:22: error: sys/vm86.h: No such file or directory
elks.c: In function 'elks_init':
elks.c:37: error: invalid use of undefined type 'st
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:29:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439701: Acknowledgement (linux86: FTBFS: elks.c:18:22:
error: sys/vm86.h: No such file or directory)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
tags 439500 + confirmed
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
>
> Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering directory `/build/user/gutenprint-5.0.1/debian/build'
> make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 439500 + confirmed
Bug#439500: gutenprint: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat
`./debian/install/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/print': No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 439584 + moreinfo
Bug#439584: monotone - FTBFS: 1 of 3 tests failed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
tags 439584 + moreinfo
thanks
On 8/25/07, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> [...]
> > Of 446 tests run:
> > 0 succeeded
> > 444 failed
> > 2 had expected failures
> > 0 succeeded unexpectedly
> > 0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 439392
> http://bugzilla.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/show_bug.cgi?id=173
Bug#439392: backup-manager: password disclosure in backup uploads
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://bugzilla.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/show_bug
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 11:05:02 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 0.36-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
On 8/26/07, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following error:
> cc -O -c -o elks.o elks.c
> elks.c:18:22: error: sys/vm86.h: No such file or directory
I know, I know. Sorry for that.
Version 0.16.17-2 was uploaded shor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 439573 serious
Bug#439573: gdc-4.1 - FTBFS: make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
tags 439452 +patch
thankyou
A simple addition to the Build-Depends seems to solve the
problem. Please find the patch attached.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
diff -urN xmakemol-5.15/debian/control xmakemol-5.15.0/debian/contro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 439452 +patch
Bug#439452: xmakemol: FTBFS: error: GL/GLwMDrawA.h: No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thankyou
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 07:10:50AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Niko Tyni dijo [Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 12:13:20PM +0300]:
> > > My vague guess about the reason is that "use of undefined variable in
> > > socket".
> > >
> > > Could it be that getprotobyname('tcp') returns undef?
> >
> > Yes, the pack
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 439573 important
Bug#439573: gdc-4.1 - FTBFS: make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
severity 439573 important
thanks
Bastian Blank writes:
> severity 439573 serious
> thanks
>
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 08:38:37PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Bastian Blank writes:
> > > Package: gdc-4.1
> > > Version: 0.23-4.1.2-15
> > > Severity: serious
> >
> > nice try; you should know be
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 439573 serious
Bug#439573: gdc-4.1 - FTBFS: make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
severity 439573 important
thanks
> No buildd is able to build it. amd64 and i386 was not uploaded from a
> buildd, the others failed.
You'll find the full amd64 build log here [0], excelsior has been able
to build it, and amd64 package has been uploaded from it.
[0]
http://buildd.debian.org/fet
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 439573 important
Bug#439573: gdc-4.1 - FTBFS: make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
fixed 435653 0.7.3.1
please close thanks
--
=
David D. Smith
Jabber/GoogleTalk: dds at jabber.org ; GPG: 0xE6511C7E
IRC: dds on irc.freenode.net ; MSN: dds4418 at hotmail.com
==
si
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 438879
Bug#438879: FTBFS (Catalan patches applied in wrong order)
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
reopen 438879
thanks
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 07:39:04AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> rebuilding 2.0.6+debian-1 straight from the archive just works. I do not
> see this error you described.
This should explain why:
$ bash -c "echo debian/patches/ca_*.diff"
debian/patche
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 18:25:45 +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote
> As part of my NM application I am asked to fix an RC bug. I would
> like to go with this one, which is open for quite some time.
>
> If I am able to work it out, I will prepare a patch. I will also prepare
> an NMU (as part of my NM task
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 438879 normal
Bug#438879: FTBFS (Catalan patches applied in wrong order)
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Package: dcc-common
Version: 1.3.42-4
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
A vulnerability has been reported in dcc. CVE-2007-1047:
"Unspecified vulnerability in Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse (DCC) before
1.3.51 allows remote attackers to delete or add hosts in /
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> forcemerge 430386 439715
Bug#430386: Bashizm in /etc/init.d/apache2
Bug#439715: apache2.2-common: /etc/init.d/apache2 contains bash-specific
directives
Mismatch - only Bugs in the sa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> reassign 430386 apache2.2-common
Bug#430386: Bashizm in /etc/init.d/apache2
Bug reassigned from package `apache2' to `apache2.2-common'.
> forcemerge 430386 439715
Bug#430386: Bashiz
clone 439470 -1
reassign -1 libhttp-server-simple-perl 0.27-1
retitle -1 libhttp-server-simple-perl: background() returns before the server
is accepting requests
severity -1 important
tag 439470 patch
forwarded 439470 http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=27168
forwarded -1 http://rt.cpan.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 439470 -1
Bug#439470: libtest-www-mechanize-perl: FTBFS: t/page_links_content failed
Bug 439470 cloned as bug 439724.
> reassign -1 libhttp-server-simple-perl 0.27-1
Bug#439724: libtest-www-mechanize-perl: FTBFS: t/page_links_content failed
Bug r
Hi.
Hing-Wah Wan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (26/08/2007):
> Package: gnomesword
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Would have been great to have the version here. 2.2.3-1+b2 I assume?
> libclucene0 have been renamed to libclucene0ldbl, but the package
> have not yet updated the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 439452 patch
Bug#439452: xmakemol: FTBFS: error: GL/GLwMDrawA.h: No such file or directory
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
tag 439452 patch
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (25/08/2007):
> ../xmakemol.c:45:60: error: GL/GLwMDrawA.h: No such file or directory
> ../xmakemol.c: In function 'main':
> ../xmakemol.c:226: error: 'glwMDrawingAreaWidgetClass' undeclared (first use
> in this function)
> ../xmakemol.c:
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
