Dear Dmitry,
Dmitry V. Rutsky schrieb:
After some pleasant tinkering with GDB (didn't use that for ages) and fixing
various things I managed to make it start a game; the graphics and gameplay
at the beginning seem normal. Sound works, but music is just a loud humming.
Loading a game produce
Package: gjdoc
Version: 0.7.8-2
Severity: grave
Hi,
while 0.7.8-1 worked, 0.7.8-2 breaks building OOo:
[...]
Writing HTML files for package com.sun.star.tools.uno
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(libgcj_bc.so.1)
at gnu.classpath.tools.gjdoc.Mai
> > 'Dir':'.', # /
> > 'Dir::State' : 'apt/', # var/lib/apt/
> >
> > belle:/home/folkert/Personal/src/pov# /etc/init.d/apt-proxy restart
> > Stopping apt-proxy.
> > Starting apt-proxy
> > Failed to load application: /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/apt_pkg.so:
> > undefined symbol
data on port TCP 8080
[1] Started stream webcam server in port 8000
[1] File of type 2 saved to: /data/webcam/snapshot.jpg
[1] File of type 32 saved to: /data/webcam/20070806-timelapse.mpg
[1] File of type 2 saved to: /data/webcam/snapshot.jpg
[1] File of type 2 saved to: /data/webcam/snapshot.jpg
[1]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> severity 399609 important
Bug#399609: my document was truncated to zero length
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Gonéri Le Bouder wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:44:45PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> Package: warsow
>> Version: 0.31.dfsg-4
>> Severity: grave
>> Justification: renders package unusable
>>
>> when I launch warsow I get:
>>
>>
>> ERROR: R_Upload32_3D: texture is too
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 11:42:13AM +0300, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> Gonéri Le Bouder wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:44:45PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> >> Package: warsow
> >> Version: 0.31.dfsg-4
> >> Severity: grave
> >> Justification: renders package unusable
> >>
> >> when I launch wa
Package: freemind
Severity: serious
Version: 0.7.1-6
Hi,
after installation, freemind fails to execute:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ freemind
Exception in thread "main" java.awt.AWTError: Cannot load AWT toolkit:
gnu.java.awt.peer.gtk.GtkToolkit
at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(libgcj.so.70)
Package: libpcrecpp0
Version: 7.2-1
Severity: serious
- gDF .text Base _ZN7pcrecpp2RE4InitEPKcPKNS_10RE_OptionsE
+ gDF .text Base
_ZN7pcrecpp2RE4InitERKSsPKNS_10RE_OptionsE
void RE::Init(const char *pat, const RE_Options* options)
did change to
v
Your message dated Mon, 06 Aug 2007 09:17:29 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#434738: fixed in zabbix 1:1.4.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> severity 436075 important
Bug#436075: Unable to enter "Pompon forest" -- fruit.png.xrf not found
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Hi,
On Aug 06, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Package: freemind
> Severity: serious
> Version: 0.7.1-6
> after installation, freemind fails to execute:
>
> I resolved this issue with installing libgcj7-awt, but that seems to
> depend on the java version I use - so, I'm not tagging this bug
> "patched".
>void RE::Init(const char *pat, const RE_Options* options)
> did change to
>void RE::Init(const string& pat, const RE_Options* options)
I guess I need to change the soname and hence the package name of the C++
library, then create a new source package of pcre 6.7 and build just a C++
libra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >void RE::Init(const char *pat, const RE_Options* options)
> > did change to
> >void RE::Init(const string& pat, const RE_Options* options)
>
> I guess I need to change the soname and hence the package name of the C++
> library, then create a new source package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> package qemu
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: qemu
> tags 430164 + pending
Bug#430164: qemu: qemu-system-arm: sometimes hang during etch installation
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pendi
FrSirt states that this has been fixed as of version 7.0.235[0]. The current
version in unstable is 7.1
The version in stable is currently vulnerable.
The version in unstable does not appear to be vulnerable, as none of the
exploits I tried against it were successful.
[0]http://www.frsirt.co
Package: texlive-lang-ukenglish
Version: 2007.dfsg.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
See attached log:
fmtutil: running `pdftex -ini -jobname=eplain -progname=eplain
-translate-file=cp227.tcx *eplain.ini' ...
This is pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (Web2C 7.5.6) (IN
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package vim
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: vim
> found 435401 1:7.0-122+1etch2
Bug#435401: sandbox for vim allows attackers to execute shell commands and
write files via modelines
Bug marked as found in version 1:7.0-122+1etch2.
> notfound 435401 1:7
Johannes Rohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (06/08/2007):
> ! I can't find file `pdftexconfig.tex'.
> l.2 \input pdftexconfig.tex
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-file search pdftexconfig.tex
tetex-base: usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/generic/config/pdftexconfig.tex
texlive-base-bin: usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/generic/
package vim
found 435401 1:7.0-122+1etch2
notfound 435401 1:7.1-022+1
thanks
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 01:17:11PM +0200, Taylor, Christopher PO2 USN (NCTS La
Maddalena) wrote:
> FrSirt states that this has been fixed as of version 7.0.235[0]. The current
> version in unstable is 7.1
>
> The versio
Package: latex-cjk-chinese
Version: 4.7.0+git20070708-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Per subject line. Please see details in below log:
fmtutil: running `pdftex -ini -jobname=eplain -progname=eplain
-translate-file=cp227.tcx *eplain.ini' ...
This is pdfTeXk, Version
I was apparantly hit by bug #425803. Purging jadetex solved it.
Thanks for you support!
Johannes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was apparantly hit by bug #425803
Thanks,
Johannes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 06 Aug 2007 15:56:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: tagging 431618
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Package: snort
Version: 2.7.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
snort 2.7.0-2 from experimental got synced to Ubuntu gutsy and FTBFS
on i386 which also builds the arch all packages.
The build failure happens during building the snort_manual.pdf:
,
| cd doc && mak
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27ubuntu13
> retitle 431938 Crash on invalid input
Bug#431938: devilspie: segmentation fault
Changed Bug title to `Crash on invalid input' from `devilspie: segmentation
fault'.
>
End of
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 01:08 -0400, Vladimir Z wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:.devilspie$ devilspie
> got eof
> got eof
>
> (devilspie:3378): Wnck-WARNING **: Unhandled action type (nil)
>
> (devilspie:3378): Wnck-WARNING **: Unhandled action type (nil)
>
> (devilspie:3378): Wnck-WARNING **: Unhandle
I can confirm this as well. I removed my Maildir account, and
restarted mail-notification and it did not crash.
On 8/5/07, Fabiano Manoel de Andrade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi, I think I've found the "origin" of bug. The crash occurs when I try
> to setup a system mail account. When mail-
Your message dated Mon, 06 Aug 2007 09:43:17 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#434234: selinux-policy-refpolicy-strict: config has
targeted policy instead of strict.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 436244 snort: FTBFS on sid: missing html.sty
Bug#436244: snort: FTBFS on Ubuntu gutsy
Changed Bug title to `snort: FTBFS on sid: missing html.sty' from `snort: FTBFS
on Ubuntu gutsy'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
retitle 436244 snort: FTBFS on sid: missing html.sty
thanks
Michael Bienia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (06/08/2007):
> snort 2.7.0-2 from experimental got synced to Ubuntu gutsy and FTBFS
> on i386 which also builds the arch all packages.
I guess you want to report that on Ubuntu's launchpad/BTS. I confi
Rafael,
I can see why our license is ambiguous. When we wrote it in 1994, we
intended it to mean that the program is entirely free, for any purpose
(including commercial) and without any restriction.
If it is easier if we switch to a standard free license, I would choose
the LGPL.
Best
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 13:51 +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > merge 434666 435803
> > thanks
>
> [snipped]
>
> > I believe petsc 2.3.3-1 now builds, since the new suitesparse and
> > openmpi were uploaded. Can you please try to build it and see if it
> > installs properly?
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 15:33 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 11:38 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > Package: petsc
> > Version: 2.3.3-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: no longer builds from source
> >
> > >From
> > >http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=petsc&ver=2.
On 2007-08-06 17:01:08 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Searching with packages.debian.org for html.sty in unstable reveals
> > that it's in latex2html which is in non-free. So it can't be used as a
> > build-dependency for snort.
>
> It is still depending on tetex, not on texlive, anyway. The ma
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 238237 serious
Bug#238237: grep: -P option doesn't work.
Bug#318680: grep doesn't support -P
Bug#364998: grep: once again, -P flag doesn't work
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:13:19PM +0200, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> How's this upload going? If you're sponsor is busy or not available, I
> could review and upload if everything is fine.
Hi.
I've prepared that upload I mentioned, with the fixes suggested by my
AM, plus some things lintian picked u
Package: pcregrep
Version: 7.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Everytime I tries to use pcregrep, it just fails telling:
pcregrep: Error in command-line regex at offset 0: unknown option bit(s) set
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unst
Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
Everytime I tries to use pcregrep, it just fails telling:
pcregrep: Error in command-line regex at offset 0: unknown option bit(s) set
It works fine for me:
p4-7088:~>grep power.*wait /etc/inittab
pf::powerwait:/etc/init.d/powerfail start
po::powerokwait:/etc/in
Mark Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (06/08/2007):
> Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
> >Everytime I tries to use pcregrep, it just fails telling:
> >pcregrep: Error in command-line regex at offset 0: unknown option bit(s)
> > set
Dunno whether it is related but you might want to know that:
> severity 23823
Michael Bienia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (06/08/2007):
> On 2007-08-06 17:01:08 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Searching with packages.debian.org for html.sty in unstable
> > > reveals that it's in latex2html which is in non-free. So it can't
> > > be used as a build-dependency for snort.
> >
> > I
* Lieven Vandenberghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-06 09:13]:
> I can see why our license is ambiguous. When we wrote it in 1994, we
> intended it to mean that the program is entirely free, for any purpose
> (including commercial) and without any restriction.
>
> If it is easier if we swit
On 8/6/07, Mark Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
> > Everytime I tries to use pcregrep, it just fails telling:
> > pcregrep: Error in command-line regex at offset 0: unknown option
> > bit(s) set
> >
> >
>
> It works fine for me:
>
> p4-7088:~>grep power.*wait /etc/in
whatever is easiest. i am happy with semidef_prog having either license.
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
* Lieven Vandenberghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-06 09:13]:
I can see why our license is ambiguous. When we wrote it in 1994, we
intended it to mean that the program is entirely free, fo
Hi!
On 06-08-07 15:33, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> I was apparantly hit by bug #425803. Purging jadetex solved it.
Indeed. This has been fixed now in the Debian TeXlive packages.
I'll merge this bug with #435660, a similar bug report against
latex-cjk-chinese.
Thank you for your bug report, and tha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 436232 435660
Bug#435660: latex-cjk-chinese: installing/upgrading/removing package fails
Bug#436232: latex-cjk-chinese: postinst and uninstall fail: " Package color
Error: No driver specified."
Merged 435660 436232.
> thanks
Stopping processing
Your message dated Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:01:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing #435660 and #436232 against latex-cjk-chinese
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:01:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing #435660 and #436232 against latex-cjk-chinese
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 6 Aug 2007 22:21:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line net-tools: FTBFS: /usr/include/linux/if_fddi.h:88: error:
expected specifier-qualifier-list before '__be16'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Massimiliano Toce,
Per the advisory I believe this issue is resolved in asterisk 1.4.x
debian unstable currently has version 1.4.9 so the bug should be resolved.
We have a backported version of 1.4.9 available from http://buildserver.net/
Mark
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, you wrote:
> I have installe
reopen 433739
found 433739 5.99.2
thanks
On 29/07/07 at 05:58 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> tag 433739 patch
> thanks
>
> Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (19/07/2007):
> > > mv offlineimap.html manual.html
> > > man -t -l offlineimap.1 > manual.ps
> > > /bin/bash: man: command not fo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 433739
Bug#433739: offlineimap - FTBFS: /bin/bash: man: command not found
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> foun
reopen 423516
found 423516 2.1.0-alpha29.17-7
thanks
On 06/08/07 at 02:17 +, Antonin Kral wrote:
> pimd (2.1.0-alpha29.17-8) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* explicit removal of
> removed include/linux/netinet/in.h
> removed include/linux/netinet/in-slackware.h
> .
> thanks J
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 423516
Bug#423516: pimd: FTBFS: inet.h:35: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or
'__attribute__' before 'inet_addr'
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Hello,
could you please try -18. I have figure out, that -17 was wrongly
packaged (still contains the headers).
* Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-06 22:40] wrote:
> I'm sorry, but I can reproduce this problem in an up-to-date sid chroot
> (using linux-libc-dev, not linux-kernel-header
Your message dated Mon, 06 Aug 2007 20:47:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#436165: fixed in sqlite3 3.4.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
> This bug is due to a problem in the Debian TeXlive packages.
>
> "apt-get --reinstall install texlive-base-bin texlive-base" should be enough;
> or try to purge and reinstall jadetex.
Just for the record - and for other users who get bitten by the same
bug: These steps were not enough. I haven't
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 01:59:23AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Suppose two systems, a Fedora based on gcc 4.1 and a Debian based
> on gcc 4.2, both sporting Boost 1.35.0 built with --layout=system,
> for simplicity.
>
> Now Joe User writes his app on the Fedora system and links Boos
On 06-08-07 23:01, Johannes Rohr wrote:
>
> Just for the record - and for other users who get bitten by the same
> bug: These steps were not enough. I haven't tracked the issue down to
> the exact cause, but after reinstalling jadetex, the bug was back just
> as before. At present, I keep jadetex
Package: am-utils
version: 6.1.5-6
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build
Package: atftp
version: 0.7.dfsg-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build
Package: portmap
version: 6.0-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build
Package: lprng
version: 3.8.28dfsg.1-1.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package
Package: proxy-suite
version: 1.9.2.4-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package
Package: apcupsd
version: 3.14.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build
Package: up-imapproxy
version: 1.2.4-10.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package
Package: diald
version: 0.99.4-7.2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build
Package: netkit-ntalk
version: 0.17-11
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package
Package: nessus-core
version: 2.2.9-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package
Package: ample
version: 0.5.7-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build
Package: apt-proxy
version: 1.9.36
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building apt-proxy in apt-proxy_1.9.36
Package: guile-gnome-platform
version: 2.7.99-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
checking if g++ supports -c -o file.o
Hi Steffen,
Upstream has released 3.02pl1 to address this.
However please upload your 3.02-1.1 version for now. I am very busy and
don't have time to work on the package for at least a few more days.
Thanks for your offer.
Hamish
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 08:54:44PM +1000, Steffen Joeris wrote:
Package: airport-utils
version: 1-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (07/08/2007):
> checking for G_WRAP... configure: error: Package requirements
> (g-wrap-2.0-guile >= 1.9.4) were not met:
>
> No package 'g-wrap-2.0-guile' found
Missing B-D on libgwrap-runtime0-dev, builds fine in a sid i386 chroot
once added; not tagging it wi
Your message dated Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:32:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#428190: fixed in mono 1.2.4-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:32:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427934: fixed in mono 1.2.4-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:32:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429685: fixed in mono 1.2.4-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:32:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427934: fixed in mono 1.2.4-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:32:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429685: fixed in mono 1.2.4-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: vkeybd
version: 1:0.1.17a-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/user/vkeybd
Package: teatime
version: 2.8.0-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory `/build/user/teatime-2.8.0
Package: python-oss
version: 0.0.0.20010624-3.3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building python-oss in
Package: gst-editor
version: 0.8.0-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package
Package: rake
version: 0.7.3-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
WARNING: RubyGems not installed
WARNING: Unable to test
Package: playmidi
version: 2.4debian-7
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
playmidi.h:59:29: error: linux/awe_voice.h: No
Package: tkdesk
version: 2.0-7
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
netscape_remote.c: At top level:
netscape_remote.c:1017
Package: sylpheed-claws-gtk2-extra-plugins
version: 2.6.0-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory
Package: epplets
version: 0.8.cvs.2005032801-3.2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by
Package: ppracer
version: 0.3.1-9
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory `/build/user/ppracer-0.3.1
Package: tse3
version: 0.3.1-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
mkdir .libs
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 436317 patch
Bug#436317: airport-utils: FTBFS: Buildfile: build.xml does not exist!
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
Package: inkscape
version: 0.45.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory `/build/user/inkscape
Package: balder2d
version: 1.0~rc1-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package
tag 436317 patch
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (07/08/2007):
> # Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
> ant distclean
> Buildfile: build.xml does not exist!
> Build failed
> make: *** [real-clean] Error 1
Hi Julien,
please find attached a patch which seems to fix th
Package: lcd4linux
version: 0.10.1~rc2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
then mv -f ".deps/plugin_set
Package: kinoplus
version: 0.3.5-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
i486-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I
> However, do you consider the game playable?
The full version of the game was playable on Sarge without issues
(32-bit compiled from upstream CVS). The breakage seemed to happen
when compiled on an Etch system (if that's helpful) this is both the
Debian package and Upstream's CVS.
> I am CCing t
I was able to get around the well-documented problems with the package
by subverting the build process as follows:
> * Complete the module-assistant setup steps:
> sudo m-a update,prepare
> sudo rm /usr/src/lirc*deb
> sudo m-a clean lirc
> * Unpack /usr/src/lirc-modules.tar.gz
> * Edit
Your message dated Mon, 06 Aug 2007 23:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430409: fixed in ams 1.8.8~rc2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
