Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition again.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -u patchage-0.2.3/debian/changelog patchage-0.2.3/debian/changelog
--- patchage-0.2.3/debian/changelog
+++ patchage-0.2.3/de
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 07:39:23PM -0700, Brandon wrote:
> Package: sear
> Version: 0.6.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
>
> loaders/ModelHander.h is missing an #include directive, which prevents
> sear from compiling. Here is the patch:
>
> --- ModelHandler.h.orig 2007-07-20 19:29:03.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 434040 linux-libc-dev
Bug#434040: libdebian-installer: type declaration conflict
Bug reassigned from package `libdebian-installer' to `linux-libc-dev'.
> tags 434040 d-i
Bug#434040: libdebian-installer: type declaration conflict
There were no
reassign 434040 linux-libc-dev
tags 434040 d-i
thanks
On Saturday 21 July 2007 07:47, Frans Pop wrote:
> While compiling kbd-chooser on sparc64, I got the following errors.
> Looks like there's some conflict with linux-libc-dev (2.6.22-1)?
> In file included from /usr/include/debian-installer/typ
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 09:03:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431214: fixed in patchage 0.2.3-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
also sprach Toon Verstraelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.21.0754 +0200]:
> I do know what the rootdelay is meant to do. The initramfs scripts
> assume a default value of 180 seconds, so one does not have to pass it
> explicitly at the kernel command line. That is clearly not the problem.
Have you
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:42:07 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Resolved since etch release
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Which brings me again to ask: should the main asterisk package depend on
> odbc, postgresql and such, or do we take some of those modules to
> subpackages as well?
The rational for splitting asteirsk-h323 was that the footprint for the
openh323 depenenc
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Severity: serious
Faidon,
Why have you tagged this as serious?
While I agree that asterisk shouldn't depend on additional libs, which is why
we split off the asterisk-h323, it isn't actually a 'severe violation of
Debian policy'.
I would perhaps
On Saturday 21 July 2007 11:16, martin f krafft wrote:
> But udev also sleeps for
> $rootdelay seconds *before* mdadm is called, so there will be plenty
> time for the driver to create the usb-storage-SCSI devices.
I'm tempted to reopen this bug report.
Manually adding the rootdelay parameter is a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> package asterisk asterisk-config asterisk-dbg asterisk-dev asterisk-doc
> asterisk-h323 asterisk-sounds-main asterisk-web-vmail
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: asterisk-web-vmail aste
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Second version of the patch that removes the craft.
Thanks Faidon,
I have committed to svn and it seems to build good!
tagging pending.
Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition again.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -u tkvnc-0.6/tkvnc.pl tkvnc-0.6/tkvnc.pl
--- tkvnc-0.6/tkvnc.pl
+++ tkvnc-0.6/tkvnc.pl
@@ -68,16 +68,16 @@
$mw = MainW
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition again.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -u xalan-1.10/debian/changelog xalan-1.10/debian/changelog
--- xalan-1.10/debian/changelog
+++ xalan-1.10/debian/changelog
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 09:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420236: fixed in tkvnc 0.6-9.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: asterisk
Version: 1:1.4.8~dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After performing my daily sid upgrade Asterisk fails to restart:
Setting up asterisk-config (1:1.4.8~dfsg-1) ...
Stopping Asterisk PBX: asterisk.
Starting Asterisk PBX: /usr/sbin/asterisk: error whil
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 10:03:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429653: fixed in xalan 1.10-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 10:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#433403: fixed in gnome-print 0.37-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> After performing my daily sid upgrade Asterisk fails to restart:
>
> Setting up asterisk-config (1:1.4.8~dfsg-1) ...
> Stopping Asterisk PBX: asterisk.
> Starting Asterisk PBX: /usr/sbin/asterisk: error while loading shared
> libraries: libpt.so.1.10.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> package asterisk asterisk-config asterisk-dbg asterisk-dev asterisk-doc
> asterisk-h323 asterisk-sounds-main asterisk-web-vmail
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: asterisk-web-vmail aste
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 07:30:57PM -0700, David Schleef wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 11:22:11PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > This bug is marked as only affecting sarge, but it was never fixed. If
> > this is fixed, can someone close it with the right version?
>
> It was never reported in any
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 434066 -1 -2
Bug#434066: asterisk: Fails to restart after upgrade due to dep on
libpt.so.1.10.2
Bug 434066 cloned as bugs 434076-434077.
> reassign -1 asterisk-h323
Bug#434076: asterisk: Fails to restart after upgrade due to dep on
libpt.so.1.1
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#434066: fixed in asterisk 1:1.4.8~dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#433884: fixed in asterisk 1:1.4.8~dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.6
> tags 420981 + lenny sid
Bug#420981: FTBFS: pthreadthreads.h:110: error: base type `sem_t' fails to be a
struct or class type
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid
>
End of m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> package dict dictd dictfmt dictzip
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: dictd dictzip dictfmt dict
> tags 393365 + pending
Bug#393365: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's
Tags
Hi,
The new upstream release (5.9.0) fixes the problem.
Please upgrade
Thanks
pgpaG7dWv81wN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: ttf-gentium
Version: 1.02-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.1 The package name
Hi,
Due to the upload of ttf-sil-gentium we now have two source package which
create the binary package ttf-gentium.
Please remove this source package, as it is the less updated one.
Thanks.
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.6
> tags 422182 + lenny sid
Bug#422182: linux-image-2.6-686: not installable in sid
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> found 434076 1:1.4.8~dfsg-1
Bug#434076: asterisk-h323: libpt.so.1.10.2 => not found
Bug marked as found in version 1:1.4.8~dfsg-1.
> found 434077 1.10.7~dfsg1-1
Bug#434077: libpt-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.6
> tags 422609 + lenny sid
Bug#422609: don't mess with other packages namespaces
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contac
Hi,
> please read the other bug reports, it's uncertain if the package will
> still used or not. for ipw*, you don't need them anyway at the moment.
8 months later it is certain that this package isn't needed, no? iwl3945
works with in-kernel stack and iwlwifi is going to replace that anyway.
--
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 13:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393365: fixed in dictd 1.10.2.dfsg-3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # forgot this bit
> found 391203 5.2.3-7
Bug#391203: Upgrading snmpd from 5.2.2-3 to 5.2.3-1 hangs in snmpd.postinst
Bug marked as found in version 5.2.3-7.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 15:19:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line forgot to close the bug in the changelog
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 391203 serious
Bug#391203: Upgrading snmpd from 5.2.2-3 to 5.2.3-1 hangs in snmpd.postinst
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 13:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393385: fixed in libdigest-md4-perl 1.5.dfsg-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my libdigest-md4-perl 1.5.dfsg-1.2 NMU.
diff -u libdigest-md4-perl-1.5.dfsg/debian/changelog
libdigest-md4-perl-1.5.dfsg/debian/changelog
--- libdigest-md4-perl-1.5.dfsg/debian/changelog
+++ libdigest-md4-perl-1.5.dfsg/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+libdigest-md4-
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 13:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393398: fixed in mhash 0.9.7.dfsg-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Em Sex, 2007-07-20 às 12:54 +, Debian Bug Tracking System escreveu:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #433573: amsn failed to load after upgrade to 0.97~rc1,
> which was filed against the amsn package.
>
> It has been closed by Muammar El Khatib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> close 422182
Bug#422182: linux-image-2.6-686: not installable in sid
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations
Hi,
Can we avoid removing this package, and instead just build the up to date
version from it? It has sources for 1.x and 2.x in the same source package.
If nobody disagrees, I'll take it over, modify it to build the 2.x version
as libapache2-mod-auth-radius. I can probably get it done for a firs
The script /etc/init.d/mdadm-raid uses "set -u". That means that an
error occurs if we refer to a variable which is unset. Unfortunately
mdadm-raid calls log-daemon-msg with no value for $2. The end result
is that "/etc/init.d/mdadm-raid stop" will fail.
/lib/lsb/init-functions does not suffer
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 14:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430111: fixed in spandsp 0.0.4~pre3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> tags 430462 + moreinfo
Bug#430462: aptitude: http.us.debian.org mirror is severely broken for etch
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing
Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (21/07/2007):
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: patch
A related note: when trying to build it in a clean sid chroot, I noticed
that the B-D on libcal3d11-dev can't be fulfilled, and you need to now
B-D on libcal3d12-dev.
Then, configure{,.ac} want liberis to be ==1.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.6
> tags 422611 + lenny sid
Bug#422611: FTBFS: sh: /tmp/buildd/tulip-2.0.6/debian/movelist: No such file or
directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid
>
End of message, sto
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.6
> tags 422629 + lenny sid
Bug#422629: FTBFS: hbf2gf: error while loading shared libraries:
libkpathsea.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Tags were: patch
T
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 426355 + fixed-upstream
Bug#426355: libonig SEGV when using UTF-8 encoding
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 03:53:53PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Can we avoid removing this package, and instead just build the up to date
> version from it? It has sources for 1.x and 2.x in the same source package.
>
> If nobody disagrees, I'll take it over, modify it to build the 2.x version
> as
Package: krb5-user
Version: 1.6.dfsg.1-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Today I upgraded krb5-* to 1.6.dfsg.1-6. Now, ksu fails to work reporting:
"Wrong principal in request while verifying ticket for server"
This is obscure - I have never seen it before and googling f
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 04:09:02PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (21/07/2007):
> > > Severity: serious
> > > Tags: patch
>
> A related note: when trying to build it in a clean sid chroot, I noticed
> that the B-D on libcal3d11-dev can't be fulfilled, and you need
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 05:30:21AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > Please elaborate 'right library name'
> >
> > Boost library naming is described in the documentation [0].
> >
> > [0]
> > http://www.boost.org/more/getting_started/unix-variants.html#library-naming
>
> Which does not
Hi,
Is the mod_auth_radius-2.0.c supposed to work properly with Apache 2.2.x?
I can compile it just fine, but can't get it to work on runtime. I loaded
auth_radius before auth_basic and used AuthBasicAuthoritative Off,
but it didn't work, I always get this error:
Internal error: pcfg_openfile()
Package: stellarium
Version: 0.9.0-1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Stellarium 0.9.0-1+b1 just entered testing today. I upgraded, and the
program no longer works:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ stellarium
---
[ This is Stell
Package: python-lightblue
Version: 0.2-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of python-lightblue_0.2-2 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390
> 98
[...]
> byte-compiling
> debian/python-lightblue/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/lightblue/_
*
> Build finished at 20070721-1837
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: k3d
Version: 0.6.7.0-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of k3d_0.6.7.0-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 98
[...]
> # I do not know WHY, but k3d tries to rebuild *all* the Makefiles before
> cleaning.
> # I have noticed t
uildd/flake-0.10'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20070721-0005
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ircii-pana
Version: 1:1.1-5+b1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of ircii-pana_1:1.1-5+b1 on debian-31.osdl.marist.edu by
> sbuild/s390 98
[...]
> cc -shared toc.o util.o cmd.o aim.o
> /build/buildd/ircii-pana-1.1/s390-linux-
Package: mod-xinerama-for-ion
Version: 20070410-2.1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of mod-xinerama-for-ion_20070410-2.1 on
> debian-31.osdl.marist.edu by sbuild/s390 98
[...]
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
Package: obconf
Version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of obconf_2.0.1-1 on debian-31.osdl.marist.edu by sbuild/s390
> 98
[...]
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> E: Couldn't find package libobrender
Package: avscan
Version: 3.1.1-openssl-3+b2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of avscan_3.1.1-openssl-3+b2 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by
> sbuild/s390 98
[...]
> Compiling module windb.o
> windb.c: In function 'WinDBGetPatternStatsFindIterat
Package: mono-jit
Followup-For: Bug #428190
The patch works but the only Gtk# app that i've been able to run is
gnome-rdp. f-spot crashes on startup while monodevelop crashes after
the splashscreen. tomboy crashes too. I don't know if this is
related.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenn
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.6
> tags 423857 + lenny sid
Bug#423857: twisted: FTBFS: ImportError: you need zope.interface installed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid
>
End of message, stopping processin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.6
> tags 424690 + sarge etch lenny sid
Bug#424690: CVE-2007-1673: denial of service (infinite loop) in zoo and unzoo
Tags were: confirmed security
Tags added: sarge, etch, lenny, sid
>
En
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 18:45 +0200, Benoît Dejean wrote:
> Package: mono-jit
> Followup-For: Bug #428190
>
> The patch works but the only Gtk# app that i've been able to run is
> gnome-rdp. f-spot crashes on startup while monodevelop crashes after
> the splashscreen. tomboy crashes too. I don't k
Package: nautilus
Version: 2.18.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Since my most recent sid upgrade, nautilus crashes whenever I try to open a new
file manager window, either internally, by clicking on a desktop icon, or
externally
via a launcher, e.g. on a panel. Sometim
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:30:28 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430292: fixed in petsc 2.3.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:31:42 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430254: fixed in clucene-core 0.9.16a-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:49:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#428946: fixed in openh323 1.18.0.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:49:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#428946: fixed in openh323 1.18.0.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#433821: fixed in tuxguitar 0.9.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:49:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429007: fixed in openh323 1.18.0.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:49:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429007: fixed in openh323 1.18.0.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:49:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429002: fixed in openh323 1.18.0.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:49:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429007: fixed in openh323 1.18.0.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:49:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#428946: fixed in openh323 1.18.0.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 434105 important
Bug#434105: krb5-user: ksu fails with "Wrong principal in request while
verifying ticket for server"
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:49:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429002: fixed in openh323 1.18.0.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:49:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429002: fixed in openh323 1.18.0.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
severity 434105 important
thanks
Tim Southerwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: krb5-user
> Version: 1.6.dfsg.1-6
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
I'm going to downgrade this for the time being since ksu is working fine
for me and is only one command provided b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.6
> tags 424924 + lenny sid
Bug#424924: [Priorities] g{++,cc}-multilib should be lower than standad
Tags were: d-i
Tags added: lenny, sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Plea
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:32:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#433633: fixed in gnat-4.2 4.2.1-0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.6
> # I have no reason to assume 0.1.11-1 doesnt have this problem
> found 425040 0.1.11-1
Bug#425040: id3v2: unicode support is broken and results in id3 tag data loss
Bug marked as found
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> fixed 433859 2.1
Bug#433859: ia32-libs uninstallable on ia64
Bug marked as fixed in version 2.1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
reassign #429609 xserver-xorg-video-nv
thanks
This one time, at band camp, Leandro Lisboa Penz said:
> After the following downgrade it started to work again:
> [DOWNGRADE] xserver-xorg 1:7.2-5 -> 1:7.1.0-16
> [DOWNGRADE] xserver-xorg-core 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-6 -> 2:1.1.1-21
> [DOWNGRADE] xserver-xorg-
> Nothing special. Sounds like a kernel bug.
>
> Lamont, which kernel is running on the hppa buildd?
>
> I've booted 2.6.22.1 (32-bit UP) on B2600 and will try
> a 64-bit SMP on a500 later today.
Qt4 was builded with a 32 bits kernel on hppa and
/usr/share/qt4/mkspecs/linux-g++ is present.
Juli
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2007 20:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#433586: fixed in keytouch 2.3.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
>> After the following downgrade it started to work again:
>> [DOWNGRADE] xserver-xorg 1:7.2-5 -> 1:7.1.0-16
>> [DOWNGRADE] xserver-xorg-core 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-6 -> 2:1.1.1-21
>> [DOWNGRADE] xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:1.1.5-2 -> 1:1.1.2-6
>> [DOWNGRADE] xserver-xorg-input-mouse 1:1.2.1-1 -> 1:1.1.1-3
Le samedi 21 juillet 2007 à 19:09 +0200, Mirco Bauer a écrit :
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 18:45 +0200, Benoît Dejean wrote:
> > Package: mono-jit
> > Followup-For: Bug #428190
> >
> > The patch works but the only Gtk# app that i've been able to run is
> > gnome-rdp. f-spot crashes on startup while m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 434077 - pending
Bug#434077: libpt-1.10.0: reports incorrect shlibs
Tags were: pending
Tags removed: pending
> tags 434076 - pending
Bug#434076: asterisk-h323: libpt.so.1.10.2 => not found
Tags were: pending
Tags removed: pending
> thanks
Stoppin
retitle 434077 libpt-1.10.0: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libpt1.10.7
thanks
Kilian,
Is there a reason you didn't bump the package to match the soname on libpt?
libpt 1.10.7 isn't binary compatible with 1.10.2.
Thus we normally bump the package name to match the soname and
submit through
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> reassign 430261 hdf5
Bug#430261: ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390
Bug reassigned from package `libhdf5-lam-dev' to `hdf5'.
> reassign 430260 hdf5
Bug#430260: ldbl12
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> reassign 430274 mpich
Bug#430274: ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390
Bug reassigned from package `libmpich-mpd1.0-dev' to `mpich'.
> reassign 430275 mpich
Bug#430275:
tags 434031 + patch
thanks
Here is a patch that fixes the compilation problem.
diff -r 310299b6492f kqemu-linux.c
--- a/kqemu-linux.c Sat Jul 21 23:33:32 2007 +0200
+++ b/kqemu-linux.c Sat Jul 21 23:38:18 2007 +0200
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#include
#include
#includ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 434031 + patch
Bug#434031: kqemu-source: doesn't build with 2.6.22
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
Am Samstag, den 21.07.2007, 18:45 +0200 schrieb Benoît Dejean:
> Stacktrace:
>
> at (wrapper managed-to-native) NDesk.GLib.IO.g_io_add_watch
> (NDesk.GLib.IOChannel,NDesk.GLib.IOCondition,NDesk.GLib.IOFunc,intptr)
> <0x>
> at (wrapper managed-to-native) NDesk.GLib.IO.g_io_add_watch
>
tags 428190 + tags pending upstream fixed-upstream
thanks
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 21:10 +, Benoît Dejean wrote:
> When mono appeared in sid, some months/years ago, i used to run blam,
> muine, f-spot, monodevelop and tomboy. Since then, i was only using
> tomboy. Now none of these programs don't
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 428190 + tags pending upstream fixed-upstream
Unknown tag/s: tags.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experim
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
