Package: selinux-policy-default
Version: 1:1.26-7
Severity: serious
Hi,
During a first install of selinux-policy-default in a clean chroot, it
prompts for config file changes:
Setting up libsemanage1 (2.0.3-1) ...
Setting up python2.4-minimal (2.4.4-4) ...
Linking and byte-compiling packages for
Hi,
A month later, this bug is still here. I am preparing an NMU. Please
tell me if you prefer to fix it yourself.
Thanks,
--
damJabberID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: secvpn
Version: 2.20
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package fails to purge:
(Reading database ... 5731 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing secvpn ...
Stopping Monitor Daemon for Secure Virtual Private Network: secvpnmon.
/usr/sbin/deluser: In order to use the --remov
Package: pmk
Version: 0.10.2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your postinst script fails in piuparts. Here is the output with set -x:
# ./pmk.postinst configure
+ '[' -e /usr/share/debconf/confmodule ']'
+ . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
++ '[' '!' '' ']'
++ PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1
++ export PERL_DL_NONLAZY
++
Your message dated Fri, 06 Jul 2007 09:02:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431273: fixed in unixcw 2.3-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 06 Jul 2007 09:02:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431735: fixed in devmapper 2:1.02.20-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 06 Jul 2007 09:02:20 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418307: fixed in php-imlib 0.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> tags 430285 + moreinfo
Bug#430285: ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390
Tags were: sid lenny
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please co
> Package: dcraw
> Version: 7.02-1
> Severity: serious
>
> On Thu, 05 Jul 2007, Steve King wrote:
>> However I would appreciate it if the assembled masses of legal
>> experts could confirm that they agree that this is the case.
>
> There's actually an even more fundamental problem with dcraw.c:
>
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 431855 minor
Bug#431855: piuparts test: fails to remove: post-removal script returned error
exit status 20
Severity set to `minor' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracki
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007, Steve King wrote:
> > You'll notice that we have no permission to distribute modified
> > versions of dcraw.c as required by the DFSG.
>
> I don't agree with you here. It seems to me that we do have
> permission to distribute modified versions, provided source is
> included.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 430863 unreproducible
Bug#430863: digikam: Bus error on startup
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> tags 430863 moreinfo
Bug#430863: digikam: Bus error on startup
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags added: moreinfo
> severity 430863 i
Package: nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-2.6.18-4-amd64
Version: 1.0.9639+1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
the version number in the provides field is misspelled
old:
Provides: nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-.0.9639
must:
Provides: nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-1.0.9639
Sascha K
tags 430863 unreproducible
tags 430863 moreinfo
severity 430863 important
thanks
Marcus,
Thanks for this bug report.
However as we are unable to reproduce and it hasn't been reported elsewhere
I'm going to downgrade to severity important: 'major effect on the usability
of a package, without
Your message dated Thu, 5 Jul 2007 23:31:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431709: workaround
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 431837 uim
Bug#431837: hal fails to configure in buildd chroots
Bug reassigned from package `hal' to `uim'.
> retitle 431837 kde-devel is a too coarse grained build-dep
Bug#431837: hal fails to configure in buildd chroots
Changed Bug title to
reassign 431837 uim
retitle 431837 kde-devel is a too coarse grained build-dep
thanks
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2007 at 16:25:01 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> TBH, I think the dependencies of kde-devel are broken, if they pull in
>> hal as a build-dependency.
>
> It rather seems
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:55:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
> > > miss another backport from the trunk.
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> #somebody downgraded wrong bug
> severity 431855 serious
Bug#431855: piuparts test: fails to remove: post-removal script returned error
exit status 20
Severity set to `serious' from
Your message dated Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431851: fixed in firebird1.5 1.5.4.4910rel-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Could you please create a new user on your system and verify it happens
with a fresh blank account?
Doesn't happen here obviously.
--
Loïc Minier
Ana Guerrero wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 04:12:02PM +0200, Didrik Pinte wrote:
> > Adding a DisplaySize to the Monitor section of /etc/X11/xorg.conf
> > solved the problem.
> Since this seems a problem in your configuration files, i'm going to
> close the bug. If you find out something else a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 431895 grave
Bug#431895: nautilus: Invalid memory reference
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> found 431895 2.18.1-3
Bug#431895: nautilus: Invalid memory reference
Bug marked as found in version 2.18.1-3 and reopened.
> thanks
Stoppin
Your message dated Fri, 06 Jul 2007 14:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431852: fixed in firebird2.0 2.0.1.12855.ds1-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Package: agg
Version: 2.5-1
Severity: serious
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/agg-2.5/gpc$ ls
copying.txt gpc.c gpc.h Makefile.am VERSIONS.TXT
That gpc there is http://packages.debian.org/unstable/devel/libgpcl-dev
which is non-free.
You need to remove it from the source.
Regards,
Rene
-- System Infor
Package: clamav-base
Version: 0.90.3-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
While testing with piuparts, clamav-base failed to install:
Setting up clamav-base (0.90.3-1) ...
Adding system user `clamav' (UID 104) ...
Adding new group `clamav' (GID 105) ...
Adding new user `clamav' (UID 104) with group `c
Package: hlatex-fonts-base
Version: 1.0-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
While running piuparts on latex-cjk-korean, I ran into a problem in your
package's postinst:
Setting up hlatex-fonts-base (1.0-5) ...
Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done.
Running updmap-sys. This may take some tim
This one time, at band camp, Lucas Nussbaum said:
> Package: clamav-base
> Version: 0.90.3-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> While testing with piuparts, clamav-base failed to install:
> Setting up clamav-base (0.90.3-1) ...
> Adding system user `clamav' (UID 104) ...
> Adding new group `cl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 431895 by 431692 431754
Bug#431692: nautilus crashes when diff-ext is installed
Bug#431754: diff-ext: Invalid memory reference
Bug#431895: nautilus: Invalid memory reference
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 431895 added: 431692, 43175
On 06/07/07 at 15:28 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Lucas Nussbaum said:
> > Package: clamav-base
> > Version: 0.90.3-1
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > While testing with piuparts, clamav-base failed to install:
> > Setting up clamav-base (0.90.3-1) ...
> >
block 431895 by 431692 431754
thanks
-=| Loïc Minier, Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:26:44 +0200 |=-
> Could you please create a new user on your system and verify it
> happens with a fresh blank account?
>
> Doesn't happen here obviously.
Brand new user can utilise nautilus with no problems. Ugh. I am no
Package: multex-bin
Version: 0.8.1-9
Severity: serious
While testing with piuparts, I ran into the following problem with your
package:
Setting up multex-bin (0.8.1-9) ...
Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf with new version
Make format files of multex-bin. This may take some time. ..
This one time, at band camp, Lucas Nussbaum said:
> + echo 'clamav: root'
> ++ which newaliases
> + newal=
> dpkg: error processing clamav-base (--install):
> subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> clamav-base
aha. Can you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 431920 grave
Bug#431920: "Save" doesn't work after "Redo" (data loss)
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
>
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> Check
The same bug is happening to me.
For me it is 100% reproducible, each time I install/remove/update something I
get that behaviour.
This is only since last update of aptitude.
Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- Unlimited s
I am wondering if I can just build SciPy by hand.
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2007-07-06 11:01:01 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The same bug is happening to me. For me it is 100% reproducible,
> each time I install/remove/update something I get that behaviour.
> This is only since last update of aptitude.
Ditto. 100% reproducible here.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PR
On 06/07/07 at 16:01 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Lucas Nussbaum said:
> > + echo 'clamav: root'
> > ++ which newaliases
> > + newal=
> > dpkg: error processing clamav-base (--install):
> > subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
> > Errors wer
Package: gclcvs
Version: 2.7.0-76
Severity: serious
Hi,
Installation of gclcvs fails inside piuparts:
Setting up common-lisp-controller (6.10) ...
Reinstalling for gclcvs
Recompiling Common Lisp Controller for gclcvs
/usr/bin/gclcvs: line 6: /etc/default/gclcvs: No such file or directory
Your message dated Fri, 06 Jul 2007 16:02:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431728: fixed in net-snmp 5.3.1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
This one time, at band camp, Lucas Nussbaum said:
> On 06/07/07 at 16:01 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This one time, at band camp, Lucas Nussbaum said:
> > > + echo 'clamav: root'
> > > ++ which newaliases
> > > + newal=
> > > dpkg: error processing clamav-base (--install):
> > > subprocess post
I tried applying this patch to the Debian python-scipy source package,
and it makes the packable buildable (can't vouch for whether it runs
correctly):
http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/gentoo/sci-libs/scipy/files/scipy-0.5.2-getpath.patch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
Tom Epperly wrote:
I tried applying this patch to the Debian python-scipy source package,
and it makes the packable buildable (can't vouch for whether it runs
correctly):
http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/gentoo/sci-libs/scipy/files/scipy-0.5.2-getpath.patch
I made a 0.5.2-7+
Package: freetype
Severity: grave
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
CVE-2007-3506 [0]:
The ft_bitmap_assure_buffer function in src/base/ftbimap.c in FreeType
2.3.3 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service
and possibly execute arbitrary code via u
Package: flac123
Version: 0.0.9-5
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
CVE-2007-3507 [0]:
"Stack-based buffer overflow in the local__vcentry_parse_value function
in vorbiscomment.c in flac123 (aka flac-tools or flac) before 0.0.10
allows user-assiste
Package: artwiz-cursor
Version: 1:1.3-6
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package's preinst fails when testing it with piuparts:
Unpacking xfonts-utils (from .../xfonts-utils_1%3a1.0.1-1_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package artwiz-cursor.
Unpacking artwiz-cursor (from .../artwiz-cursor_
> On 05.05.07 Lucas Nussbaum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, I discovered that your package
> > failed to build on i386.
> >
> The (probably) problematic message:
>
> /build/user/monotone-0.31/monotone.texi:151: epsf.tex not found,
> images will
Your message dated Fri, 6 Jul 2007 19:16:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427573: vlc-nox: Dependency on obsolete
libavcodec0d/libavformat0d
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> severity 431895 important
Bug#431895: nautilus: Invalid memory reference
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 03:45:29 -0700 Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Jul 2007, Steve King wrote:
> > > You'll notice that we have no permission to distribute modified
> > > versions of dcraw.c as required by the DFSG.
> >
> > I don't agree with you here. It seems to me that we do have
> > permissi
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 03:45:29AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Jul 2007, Steve King wrote:
> > > You'll notice that we have no permission to distribute modified
> > > versions of dcraw.c as required by the DFSG.
> > I don't agree with you here. It seems to me that we do have
> > permis
Your message dated Fri, 06 Jul 2007 18:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422813: fixed in gnome-vfsmm2.6 2.16.1-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 431873 - patch
Bug#431873: udeb is missing in .shlibs
Tags were: d-i patch
Tags removed: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
Your message dated Fri, 06 Jul 2007 18:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422813: fixed in gnome-vfsmm2.6 2.16.1-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 06 Jul 2007 18:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422813: fixed in gnome-vfsmm2.6 2.16.1-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 06 Jul 2007 18:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422813: fixed in gnome-vfsmm2.6 2.16.1-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:32:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431873: fixed in zlib 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431676: fixed in dns-flood-detector 1.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: med-tools
Version: 0.12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Setting up med-tools (0.12) ...
Adding menu for user users of med ...
Unknown id: users
dpkg: error processing med-tools (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Error
Your message dated Fri, 06 Jul 2007 23:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431677: fixed in emdebian-tools 0.3.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: videolink
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: grave
Tags: pending
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
An ABI change in xulrunner has broken VideoLink: the nsIContent
interface implemented by DOM nodes has changed and the old interface
is not available; this results in an assertion failure
Your message dated Sat, 07 Jul 2007 06:02:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424622: fixed in emacs22 22.1+1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> forcemerge 431054 431688
Bug#431054: aptitude doesn't respond to keyboard after installing/upgrading a
package
Bug#431688: aptitude do not react to keys after running dpkg
Forcibly M
I get this bug too. 100% reproducable so far. I would like to point out
that actually installing or upgrading or removing a package is
unnecessary. These are my steps to reproduce:
1) start aptitude
2) press "g" twice
Pressing keys has no effect. Although, I can abort out of aptitude with
Ctrl-C.
64 matches
Mail list logo
