Bug#430866: apcalc: Dangling pointer for config

tags 430866 - security tags 430866 forwarded patch severity important thanks On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 04:10:08PM -0400, Patricio Rojo wrote: > I reported this bug as a security hole just because I found what it > seems to be a dangling pointer... I have no idea if it could be > maliciously expl

Bug#431123: aptitude: Initializing package states takes very much longer than before +b1

On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 07:42:08AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 10:00:53PM -0700, Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > was heard to say: > > On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 06:12:11PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: > > > Does installing the version in experimental fix the proble

Processed: tagging 431324, severity of 431411 is important, tagging 431199

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > tags 431324 lenny sid Bug#431324: apt-watch - FTBFS: undefined reference to `glade_xml_signal_autoconnect' There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny, sid > severity 431411 important

Bug#431794: marked as done (whichwayisup: CC-v3.0 licenses do not meet the DFSG)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:41:05 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#431794: whichwayisup: CC-v3.0 licenses do not meet the DFSG has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#430866: apcalc: Dangling pointer for config

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 430866 - security Bug#430866: apcalc: Dangling pointer for config Tags were: security Tags removed: security > tags 430866 forwarded patch Unknown tag/s: forwarded. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help

Processed: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#430866: apcalc: Dangling pointer for config]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 430866 upstream Bug#430866: apcalc: Dangling pointer for config Tags were: patch Tags added: upstream > severity 430866 important Bug#430866: apcalc: Dangling pointer for config Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processin

Processed: tagging 423479

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > tags 423479 + lenny sid Bug#423479: slrnface segfaults in /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 after receiving first face There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny, sid > End of message, stopping p

Bug#424025: marked as done (python-biopython: FTBFS: *** mxTextTools *** is either not installed or out of date.)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Jul 2007 09:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424025: fixed in python-biopython 1.43-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#431831: sun-java5-jdk: Integer overflow in ICC profile parser allows execution of arbitrary code

Package: sun-java5-jdk Version: 1.5.0-10-3 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Integer overflow in the embedded ICC profile image parser in Sun Java Development Kit (JDK) before 1.5.0_11-b03, and 1.6.x before 1.6.0_01-b06, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary c

Processed: Re: Bug#431826: system-tools-backends: shares-admin fails to detect samba and nfs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 431826 libnet-dbus-perl Bug#431826: system-tools-backends: shares-admin fails to detect samba and nfs Bug reassigned from package `system-tools-backends' to `libnet-dbus-perl'. > forcemerge #430186 431826 Bug#430186: Upgrading to dbus 1.1.1 br

Bug#431837: hal fails to configure in buildd chroots

Package: hal Version: 0.5.9.1-1 Severity: grave Hi, hal fails to configure correctly inside of buildd chroots, see e.g. http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=uim&ver=1%3A1.4.1-4&arch=i386&stamp=1182471498&file=log Setting up hal (0.5.9.1-1) ... chage: the shadow password file is not present /u

Bug#427260: marked as done (am-utils: FTBFS: error: cannot find UTS_RELEASE in )

Your message dated Thu, 05 Jul 2007 11:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#427260: fixed in am-utils 6.1.5-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#431831: sun-java5-jdk: Integer overflow in ICC profile parser allows execution of arbitrary code

tags 431831 + pending thanks when do people start checking the NEW queue before filing bogus reports? Sam Morris schrieb: > Package: sun-java5-jdk > Version: 1.5.0-10-3 > Severity: grave > Tags: security > Justification: user security hole > > Integer overflow in the embedded ICC profile image p

Bug#431831: sun-java5-jdk: Integer overflow in ICC profile parser allows execution of arbitrary code

On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 13:05 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > tags 431831 + pending > thanks > > when do people start checking the NEW queue before filing bogus reports? I wasn't aware that security updates for stable generally went through NEW. Furthermore, the only entry that I see there for Sun's

Bug#431843: FTBFS: ghc-6.6.1: not built for interactive use

Package: washngo Version: 2.10-1 Severity: serious Heya, washngo fails to build on all architectures: | /usr/bin/make haddock | make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/washngo-2.10' | ./Setup.lhs haddock | ghc-6.6.1: not built for interactive use | make[1]: *** [haddock] Error 1 | make[1]: Le

Processed: tagging 242866

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > tags 242866 - etch Bug#242866: drivers containing firmware blobs Tags were: upstream sid d-i etch help etch-ignore sarge-ignore Bug#243022: ymfpci_image.h: Sourceless microcode withou

Processed: tagging 242866

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > tags 242866 - sid Bug#242866: drivers containing firmware blobs Tags were: upstream sid d-i help etch-ignore sarge-ignore Bug#243022: ymfpci_image.h: Sourceless microcode without perm

Processed: tagging 423040

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > tags 423040 lenny Bug#423040: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me i

Processed: found 431751 in 2.6.21-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > found 431751 2.6.21-1 Bug#431751: ipw3945.ko missing from ipw3945-modules package on 686. Bug#430646: ipw3945-modules-2.6.21-1-686: module missing from package Bug#430904: ipw3945-mod

Bug#431736: git-core_1:1.5.3~rc0-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: test failure in git-svn tests

On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 05:16:30PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > your package failed to build from source. Some new test failures this > time. Unstable seems to be affected as well. Yes, the workaround to use -O0 on hppa did help a bit; now, I'm nearly sure, it's subversion that fails in git's

Bug#431852: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm

Package: firebird2.0-classic Version: 2.0.1.12855.ds1-7 Severity: serious Usertags: postrm-depends-nonessential User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Justification: Policy violation, see section 7.2 hi, while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on purge because of debconf beeing unavailable

Bug#431853: depends on non-essential package adduser in postrm

Package: amavisd-new Version: 1:2.4.2-6.2 Severity: serious Usertags: postrm-depends-nonessential User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Justification: Policy violation, see section 7.2 hi, while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on purge because of adduser beeing unavailable during postrm

Bug#431851: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm

Package: firebird1.5-classic Version: 1.5.4.4910rel-6 Severity: serious Usertags: postrm-depends-nonessential User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Justification: Policy violation, see section 7.2 hi, while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on purge because of debconf beeing unavailable d

Bug#422032: marked as done (gnushogi: Package fails to install, making it mostly useless)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Jul 2007 13:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422032: fixed in gnushogi 1.3.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#431855: piuparts test: fails to remove: post-removal script returned error exit status 20

Package: isdnutils-base Version: 1:3.9.20060704-3 Severity: serious hi, while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on remove with the following error: Removing isdnutils-base ... Purging configuration files for isdnutils-base ... There are still files in /etc/isdn/ that

Bug#431856: piuparts test: fails to install: xargs: /usr/lib/oo2c/ooconfig: No such file or directory

Package: libooc-xml-dev Version: 3.2.0-2 Severity: serious hi, while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on install with the following error: Setting up libooc-xml-dev (3.2.0-2) ... xargs: /usr/lib/oo2c/ooconfig: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing libooc-

Bug#431857: piuparts test: fails to install: ghc-pkg: dependency MissingH-0.18.3 doesn't exist

Package: libghc6-anydbm-dev Version: 1.0.3 Severity: serious hi, while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on install with the following error: Setting up libghc6-anydbm-dev (1.0.3) ... Reading package info from stdin ... done. ghc-pkg: dependency MissingH-0.18.3 doesn

Processed: tagging 431855

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 431855 + etch-ignore Bug#431855: piuparts test: fails to remove: post-removal script returned error exit status 20 There were no tags set. Tags added: etch-ignore > End of mess

Bug#431837: hal fails to configure in buildd chroots

On Thu, Jul 5, 2007 at 16:25:01 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > TBH, I think the dependencies of kde-devel are broken, if they pull in > hal as a build-dependency. It rather seems that uim should not build-depend on kde-devel, as this package is just a metapackage for users, not meant for other pa

Bug#431837: hal fails to configure in buildd chroots

Andreas Barth wrote: > Package: hal > Version: 0.5.9.1-1 > Severity: grave > > Hi, > > hal fails to configure correctly inside of buildd chroots, see e.g. > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=uim&ver=1%3A1.4.1-4&arch=i386&stamp=1182471498&file=log > > Setting up hal (0.5.9.1-1) ... > chage:

Bug#422396: [Monotone-devel] Packages for Debian testing

Hi, Richard. You can always cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] That will reach the maintainer and anyone who has subscribed. Cheers, Shaun On 7/5/07, Richard Levitte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'm looking through the current monotone bugs in TBS. Which of you do I talk to about them? One bug report d

Bug#431865: gcj-4.1 FTBFS on hppa

Package: gcj-4.1 Version: 4.1.2-12 Severity: serious Hi, this package FTBFS on hppa, please see http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=gcj-4.1&ver=4.1.2-12&arch=hppa&stamp=1181614009&file=log /build/buildd/gcj-4.1-4.1.2/build/gcc/gcj -B/build/buildd/gcj-4.1-4.1.2/build/hppa-linux-gnu/libjava/

Bug#431874: strongswan - FTBFS: cannot create regular file `/etc/ipsec.conf': Permission denied

Package: strongswan Version: 4.1.4-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of strongswan_4.1.4-1 on debian-31.osdl.marist.edu by > sbuild/s390 98 [...] > Making install in stroke > make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/strongswan-4.1.

Bug#431873: udeb is missing in .shlibs

Package: zlib1g Version: 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch, d-i It seems that in fixing #431124, you have removed the .shlibs entry mentioning zlib1g-udeb. This currently breaks the debian-installer builds as udeb depending on zlib1g doesn't reference the correct package anymore. Th

Bug#431875: referencer - FTBFS: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before '*' token

Package: referencer Version: 1.0.2-1+b1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of referencer_1.0.2-1+b1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 > 98 [...] > Making all in src > make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/referencer-1.0.2/src' >

Bug#431873: udeb is missing in .shlibs

tag 431873 - patch thanks On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 06:49:51PM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > The attached patch should fix this issue. Only for the d-i case, unfortunately. The cross library packages also have the same problem and it looks like they can't be fixed without doing the shlibs by hand

Bug#431511: marked as done (depends on non-essential package adduser in postrm)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Jul 2007 17:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#431511: fixed in armagetronad 0.2.8.2.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#431873: udeb is missing in .shlibs

On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 06:49:51PM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > It seems that in fixing #431124, you have removed the .shlibs entry > mentioning zlib1g-udeb. This currently breaks the debian-installer > builds as udeb depending on zlib1g doesn't reference the correct package > anymore. That's n

Bug#431883: dcraw license does not give permission to distribute modified versions or source alongside

Package: dcraw Version: 7.02-1 Severity: serious On Thu, 05 Jul 2007, Steve King wrote: > However I would appreciate it if the assembled masses of legal > experts could confirm that they agree that this is the case. There's actually an even more fundamental problem with dcraw.c: /* dcraw.c --

Bug#431887: bluez-hcidump: FTBFS: sniff_subrate_cp undeclared

Package: blue-hcidump Version: 1.35-1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -g -Wall -O2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c hci.c hci.c: In function 'sniff_subrate_dump': hci.c:778: error: 'sniff_subrate_cp' undeclared (first use in this function) hci.c:778: er

Processed: tagging 423040

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > tags 423040 - lenny Bug#423040: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D Tags were: lenny Tags removed: lenny > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if y

Processed: control

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 423040 - lenny Bug#423040: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D There were no tags set. Tags removed: lenny > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (

Bug#431680: marked as done (piuparts test: fails to install: Can't locate Data/Dumper.pm in @INC )

Your message dated Thu, 05 Jul 2007 18:47:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#431680: fixed in ssbd 0.10-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613

On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may > miss another backport from the trunk. Did someone check already ? > Side note: gcc-snapshot currently cannot be built due to the too > stric

Bug#427904: balder2d: Maybe my error log can help you.

Package: balder2d Followup-For: Bug #427904 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ balder2d /usr/lib/balder2d/balder2d: Symbol `_ZTVN3gcn9TextFieldE' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking /usr/lib/balder2d/balder2d: Symbol `_ZTVN3gcn6ButtonE' has different size in shared object, consider re-lin

Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613

On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:55:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may > > miss another backport from the trunk. > Did someone check already ? Pro

Bug#431883: dcraw license does not give permission to distribute modified versions or source alongside

Hi Don, The license against which you have raised a bug is not the one that covers the version that is currently part of debian. The appropriate license is here: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/d/dcraw/dcraw_8.39-1/dcraw.copyright You should also probably consider the text on

Processed: xscreensaver-command: Not working option -restart, -unthrottle, -deactivate, -throttle

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xscreensaver Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xscreensaver > severity 430848 important Bug#430848: xscreensaver-command: Not working option -restart, -unthrottle, -deactivate, -throttle Severity set to `important' from `critical' > tags 430848

Bug#428997: strace: FTBFS: ../net.c:803: error: 'PACKET_ADD_MEMBERSHIP' undeclared here (not in a function)

All of these problems indicate regressions in the installed kernel headers. I don't think this should be considered an strace bug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#431883: dcraw license does not give permission to distribute modified versions or source alongside

On Thu, 05 Jul 2007, Steve King wrote: > The license against which you have raised a bug is not the one that covers > the version that is currently part of debian. The appropriate license is > here: Right, but the issues present in the current version of the license are also present in the versi

Processed: reassign 425700 to linux-libc-dev, forcibly merging 423462 425700

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > reassign 425700 linux-libc-dev Bug#425700: sendmail_8.14.1-4(ia64/unstable): FBTFS: >= has no left operand Bug reassigned from package `sendmail' to `linux-libc-dev'. > forcemerge 42

Bug#431893: CVE-2007-2839: Trivial local-root attack

Package: gfax Version: 0.4.2-11 Severity: grave Usertags: sourcescan Tags: security *** Please type your report below this line *** The gfax package as released in Sarge, make unsafe use of temporary files which allow local users to gain root trivially. Etch, Lenny, and Sid are unaffected

Bug#425897: Still FTBFS (usually) for me

reopen 425897 severity 425897 important retitle 425897 libfilesys-diskspace-perl: FTBFS sometimes: Race condition in tests notfixed 425897 0.05-11 thanks First of all, I didn't see any of your comments to the bug before it was closed, because you never CC'd me or 425897-submitter... With the lat

Processed: closing 425700

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > close 425700 2.6.21-3 Bug#425700: sendmail_8.14.1-4(ia64/unstable): FBTFS: >= has no left operand 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked a

Bug#428997: strace: FTBFS: ../net.c:803: error: 'PACKET_ADD_MEMBERSHIP' undeclared here (not in a function)

Hello Roland, On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 11:54:47AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > All of these problems indicate regressions in the installed kernel headers. > I don't think this should be considered an strace bug. The installed headers are what the kernel version 2.6.21 (tested with 2.6.22-rc4 too

Bug#431893: marked as done (CVE-2007-2839: Trivial local-root attack)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Jul 2007 21:12:59 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#431893: Acknowledgement (CVE-2007-2839: Trivial local-root attack) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#431893: Acknowledgement (CVE-2007-2839: Trivial local-root attack)

This is fixed in DSA-1329-1. Just reported here for reference. Steve -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#422211: marked as done (/usr/lib/rpm/macros contains a wrong path for bzip2)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Jul 2007 21:02:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422211: fixed in rpm 4.4.1-14.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 431580 + fixed-upstream Bug#431580: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm Tags were: etch-ignore Tags added: fixed-upstream > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administ

Bug#431906: berusky: no data in levels

Package: berusky Version: 1.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When I start game there are no data in levels - no walls, no barrels, only the bug you can move, but you cannot play it. I had the same problem when I compiled the game from sources provided on the internet.

Bug#431031: fixed upstream?

According to http://lists.qgis.org/pipermail/qgis-user/2007-June/001498.html building with QT 4.3 should be fixed in the new upstream release. -- Regards, Andreas Henriksson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#431906: berusky: no data in levels

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 431906 berusky: unplayable on powerpc Bug#431906: berusky: no data in levels Changed Bug title to `berusky: unplayable on powerpc' from `berusky: no data in levels'. > tags 431906 help Bug#431906: berusky: unplayable on powerpc There were no t

Bug#430051: marked as done (texmaker Segmentation faults)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Jul 2007 22:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#430051: fixed in texmaker 1.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#428650: can't install kernel

Help, I cannot finish installing new kernels. dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-image-2.6.21-2-k7: linux-image-2.6.21-2-k7 depends on module-init-tools (>= 0.9.13); however: Package module-init-tools is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6.21-2-k7 (-

Bug#428650: can't install kernel

On Jul 06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Help, I cannot finish installing new kernels. debian-user@ -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#428650: module-init-tools: Upgrade fails: Tries to overwrite diversion of french man page

Hi Marco, I think the root cause of this bug is the old bug in dpkg, whereby if a file has been diverted on the filesystem, dpkg will not clean it up when the owning package stops shipping it. This bug has since been fixed in dpkg, but modutils must have stopped shipping /usr/share/man/fr/man5/mo

Bug#428650: rm /usr/share/man/fr/man5/modules.5.gz

I did # rm /usr/share/man/fr/man5/modules.5.gz # apt-get install and now things are OK again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging bugs that are closed by packages in NEW as pending

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW > # > tags 381418 pending Bug#381418: ITP: wapiti -- Web application vulnerability scanner There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 430251 pending Bug#430251: ldbl128 transition for alpha, po

Bug#431921: mlview_0.9.0-1: FTBFS: can't parse dependency zlib1g gconf2 (>= 2.10.1-2)

Package: mlview Version: 0.9.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: etch-ignore Hi Sebastien, mvliew is currently failing to build from source, because for the first time the ${misc:Depends} field is being populated in unstable and debian/control incorrectly lists the dependencies as '${shlibs:Depends} ${mi

Bug#431923: depends on package not in repositories

Package: pokerth Version: 0.4-1 Severity: serious pokerth depends on package libboost-thread1.33.1 which is no longer in the repositories can you please make it depend on libboost-thread1.34.0 instead which is in. thanks System Information Debian Release: unstable Architecture: i686 Kernel: 2.

Bug#431924: snmptrapfmt: hard-coded dependency on libsnmp9, missing ${shlibs:Depends}

Package: snmptrapfmt Version: 1.11 Severity: serious Tags: etch-ignore Hi Jochen, The snmptrapfmt package is uninstallable in unstable because it has the following dependencies: Package: snmptrapfmt Depends: snmpd, libsnmp9 libsnmp9 is no longer available in unstable, having been replaced w

Bug#430186: new package with upstream patches

I prepared a new package with Daniel's patches applied. If someone can confirm that it resolves this bug, I will upload the new package: http://cgi.sfu.ca/~jdbates/debian/pool/libnet-dbus-perl/ Thanks, Jack signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: setting package to po4a, tagging 431162

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > package po4a Ignoring bugs not assigned to: po4a > tags 431162 + pending Bug#431162: po4a loops indefinitely while parsing options There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End

Bug#431927: yaird: assumes /lib/lvm, incompatible with lvm2 2.02.26

Package: yaird Version: 0.0.12-20 Severity: serious Tags: lenny sid The current version of yaird in unstable is not compatible with the current version of lvm2, because yaird requires /lib/lvm-200/vgchange no longer exists, replaced by /sbin/vgchange. This causes failures trying to generate initr

Bug#430252: marked as done (ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Jul 2007 23:12:05 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#430252: ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#431938: devilspie: segmentation fault

Package: devilspie Version: 0.20.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.21.5 (PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charm

Bug#431941: python-pyode: new (lib)ode version breaks pyode

Package: python-pyode Version: 1.2.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi there, its not possbile to use pyode, not with the version in sid nor the experimental one... >>> import ode Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in ? ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.