Bug#428338: marked as done (gaim-irchelper: Repackage for pidgin)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:01:32 +0300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#428338: gaim-irchelper: Repackage for pidgin has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Processed: tagging 427184

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > # there is a patch attached, tag appropriatelly > tags 427184 patch Bug#427184: should build-depend on firebird1.5-dev or even better - firebird2.0-dev There were no tags set. Tags a

Bug#427427: icedove: Possibly more details

Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote: > > I don't understand what you want to say, sorry! Is the problem gone > for you? Yes. Alas I'm not 100% clear what resolved it. Removing the Tango theme is top of my suspicion list. It is hard to be sure. At one point I thought the issue was selecting an

Bug#427046: marked as done (libapache2-mod-fcgid upgrade to 1:2.1-1 breaks apache2)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 07:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#427046: fixed in libapache2-mod-fcgid 1:2.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#427427: icedove: Possibly more details

severity 427427 important thanks On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 08:30:07AM +0100, Simon Waters wrote: > Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote: > > > > I don't understand what you want to say, sorry! Is the problem gone > > for you? > > Yes. Alas I'm not 100% clear what resolved it. > > Removing the Tan

Processed: Re: Bug#427427: icedove: Possibly more details

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 427427 important Bug#427427: When this package is installed icedove is crashing on every mail read Severity set to `important' from `critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#422617: marked as done (FTBFS: Failed test 'use MyApp;')

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:21:37 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422617: FTBFS: Failed test 'use MyApp;' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#428363: apt - FTBFS: Unmet build dependencies: libcurl3-gnutls-dev (>= 7.15.5)

e: (Use -d flag to override.) > ** > Build finished at 20070611-0121 > FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#422729: grub-of (Re: Please fix your RC bugs)

On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 10:42:58PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > Hi, > > please note that even while we're not going to release Lenny next month, > RC bugs should be fixed in a very timly manner. Usually there is no > reason to let them open, and so we already started removing packages for > being

Bug#426647: marked as done (FLAC 1.1.4 is coming, library transition imminent)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:47:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#427744: fixed in gst-plugins-good0.10 0.10.5-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#427744: marked as done (gst-plugins-good0.10 - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstflac.so': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:47:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#427744: fixed in gst-plugins-good0.10 0.10.5-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#426647: marked as done (FLAC 1.1.4 is coming, library transition imminent)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:47:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#426647: fixed in gst-plugins-good0.10 0.10.5-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#427744: marked as done (gst-plugins-good0.10 - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstflac.so': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:47:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#426647: fixed in gst-plugins-good0.10 0.10.5-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#427562: marked as done (texlive-base-bin: Launches forkbomb on upgrade/install)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:47:11 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#427562: fixed in tex-common 1.8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#359803: marked as done (pitivi: completely useless)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:59:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#359803: #359803 pitivi: completely useless has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#425078: rubber: diff for NMU version 1.1-2.1

tags 425078 + patch thanks Hi, Attached is the diff for my rubber 1.1-2.1 NMU, which I uploaded to DELAYED/2-day. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org — As the ship lay in

Processed: rubber: diff for NMU version 1.1-2.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 425078 + patch Bug#425078: rubber: Build from source makes broken package There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administra

Processed: setting package to xchat-gnome xchat-gnome-common, tagging 412035, tagging 420322

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > package xchat-gnome xchat-gnome-common Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xchat-gnome xchat-gnome-common > tags 412035 + pending Bug#412035: xchat-gnome should include a gconf schema for

Processed: closing 424839

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > close 424839 2.1.2-2 Bug#424839: php4-memcache: affected by php4-removal 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 2.1.2-

Processed: (no subject)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 428368 grave Bug#428368: lighttpd: Repeatable --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) --- Severity set to `grave' from `important' > forwarded 428368 http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/ticket/1232 Bug#428368: lighttpd: Repeatable --- SIGSEGV (Segm

Bug#426371: Which Packages?

On Tue, 29 May 2007, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > It should be mentioned that at some point during this cycle, sid was indeed > in sources.list, but pinned away. I believe the problem to be there. I also used a similar setup and update-manager seems to happily ignore pinning. Or at least used to

Bug#416752: marked as done (depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:02:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#416752: fixed in flyspray 0.9.8-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#428371: swh-plugins - FTBFS: error: unrecognized command line option "-march=s390"

ive] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/swh-plugins-0.4.15' > make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/swh-plugins-0.4.15' > make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 > ***

Bug#428376: fische - FTBFS: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `prefetchw'

Package: fische Version: 2.0~alpha3-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of fische_2.0~alpha3-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 98 [...] > s390-linux-gnu-gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"fische\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"fische\" > -DPACKAGE_VERSION

Bug#426371: Which Packages?

On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 12:03:33PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >> It should be mentioned that at some point during this cycle, sid was indeed >> in sources.list, but pinned away. > I believe the problem to be there. I also used a similar setup and > update-manager seems to happily ignore pinning

Bug#428053: libpam-poldi: segfaults after removing the cardreader

Hi, unfortunately, I do not have a USB cardreader, so of course patches are very welcome :-) Otherwise maybe Moritz can comment on that. Moritz, are you still working on libpam-poldi? Greetings from DebConf, Joachim Am Freitag, den 08.06.2007, 14:05 +0200 schrieb Alexander Wirt: > Package: lib

Bug#428374: gcc-snapshot - FTBFS: make: *** [stamps/02-patch-stamp-libjava-biarch-alsa] Error 1

saving rejects to file > libjava/classpath/native/jni/midi-alsa/Makefile.in.rej > make: *** [stamps/02-patch-stamp-libjava-biarch-alsa] Error 1 > ** > Build finished at 20070611-1106 > FAILED [dpkg-build

Bug#426453: sshfs-fuse: diff for NMU version 1.7-2.1

tags 426453 + patch thanks Hi, Attached is the diff for my sshfs-fuse 1.7-2.1 NMU. -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want t

Processed: sshfs-fuse: diff for NMU version 1.7-2.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 426453 + patch Bug#426453: sshfs: Missing dependency on ssh There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bu

Bug#428323: libgempc430: Causes pcscd to segfault on startup

Selon Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Package: libgempc430 > Version: 1.0.1-5 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > When a Gemplus smart card reader is connected and this package is installed > libgempc430 segfaults on startup on my PowerPC based system: I tried to rep

Bug#426453: marked as done (sshfs: Missing dependency on ssh)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:17:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#426453: fixed in sshfs-fuse 1.7-2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#425935: marked as done (subcommander: FTBFS: cannot find -lsvn_ra_dav-1)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:31:57 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#425935: subcommander: FTBFS: cannot find -lsvn_ra_dav-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#426258: marked as done (cinelerra: playback does not stop)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:12:19 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#426258: cinelerra: playback does not stop has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#420322: marked as done (xchat-gnome: FTBFS: db2omf: Could not construct the OMF subject element)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:47:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#420322: fixed in xchat-gnome 1:0.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#428390: acpi=off does work on commandline but not in in lilo.conf

Package: lilo Version: 1:22.6.1-9.3 severity: grave When cold booting one of my servers after 10 seconds of lilo-timeout I see on the console: === boot: Loading Linux. BIOS data check successful Uncompressing Linux... Ok, booting the kernel. === After that nothing happens. I think that lilo does

Bug#426371: Which Packages?

On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 12:03:33PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > >> It should be mentioned that at some point during this cycle, sid was indeed > >> in sources.list, but pinned away. > > I believe the problem to be there. I also used a similar s

Bug#425928: More info on slony1 build failure

Am Sonntag, den 10.06.2007, 14:17 -0400 schrieb Daniel Schepler: > Here's the output of `docbook2x-man --debug slony.xml' from doc/adminguide, in > case it gives any clue what's going wrong: > ... > frobnitz:/tmp/buildd/slony1-1.2.9/doc/adminguide# docbook2x-man --debug > slony.xml > /usr/bin/xslt

Bug#400340: Update

found 400340 2.0.0.0-4 thanks -pkg icedove ver 2.0.0.0-3 +pkg icedove ver 2.0.0.0-4 icedove http://bugs.debian.org/400340 icedove-2.0.0.0/icedove-2.0.0.0-source.tar.bz2:mozilla/directory/c-sdk/ldap/docs/draft-ietf-ldapext-ldap-c-api-05.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

Processed: Update

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 400340 2.0.0.0-4 Bug#400340: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's Bug marked as found in version 2.0.0.0-4. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admini

Bug#423040: Update

found 423040 2.6.21-4 thanks -pkg linux-2.6 ver 2.6.21-2 +pkg linux-2.6 ver 2.6.21-4 + linux-2.6 http://bugs.debian.org/423040 linux-2.6-2.6.21/Documentation/netlabel/draft-ietf-cipso-ipsecurity-01.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Processed: Update

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 423040 2.6.21-4 Bug#423040: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D Bug marked as found in version 2.6.21-4. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administra

Bug#428399: Fails to boot, cannot mount / partition: No such device

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.88 Severity: critical - --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Hi! Upgrading from 0.87b to 0.88 fails to boot with this message and drops to busybox: mount: Mounting /dev/sda5 on /root failed: No such de

Bug#425071: suggested resolution

The above-referenced libboost issue #424038 may take a while to be resolved, and it isn't clear that -lboost_regex will come back once it has been resolved. However, we don't need to wait to resolve the FTBFS bug. We can restore the existing behaviour by changing the link from -lboost_regex to -l

Bug#427562: forkbomb: Workaround and request for comment on documentation

Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Comments? Nice explanation, thank you. -- Florent

Bug#428323: libgempc430: Causes pcscd to segfault on startup

On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 01:18:32PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Can you rebuild the libgempc430 package and install the driver directly so the > debug info is not stripped? Done that. Note that when doing this you need to patch the Makefiles to avoid stripping the binary. Console output:

Bug#423984: marked as done (urwid: FTBFS: cannot stat `debian/python-urwid/usr/share/python-support/python-urwid/urwid-0.9.8-py2.4.egg-info)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:32:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423984: fixed in urwid 0.9.8-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#428293: file: DoS in 4.21-1

Package: file Version: 4.21-1 Followup-For: Bug #428293 Different issue, but here is information about DoS bug: http://www.amavis.org/security/asa-2007-3.txt -quote begin- To check, if this issue has been properly fixed, please do the following steps: $ perl -e 'for (1..2700) {print "\n" x 10}'

Bug#426129: marked as done (qt4-x11: FTBFS on arm)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:02:15 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#426129: fixed in qt4-x11 4.3.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#428323: libgempc430: Causes pcscd to segfault on startup

Selon Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Console output: > > pcscdaemon.c:297:main() pcscd set to foreground with debug send to stderr > debuglog.c:213:DebugLogSetLevel() debug level=debug > pcscdaemon.c:500:main() pcsc-lite 1.4.2 daemon ready. > [New Thread 813900992 (LWP 30547)] > hotplug_libusb.c

Bug#428408: konqueror-plugin-gnash should depends gnash

Package: konqueror-plugin-gnash Version: 0.7.2+cvs20070512.1554-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable else we see this in the console: konqueror: KlashPart::openURL http://nainwak.com/images/logos/NWReloaded2.swf konqueror: gnash -x 25166754 -j 400 -k 60 '/tmp/kde-madcoder

Bug#428323: libgempc430: Causes pcscd to segfault on startup

On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 04:07:28PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > But the program do not execute the line 53 of GemPC430/GemPC430Utils.c > > DEBUG_CRITICAL2("OS string: %s", os_version); > > And I have no idea why. > frame #0 is corrupted so not very helpful :-( Yup, that's about as far

Processed: Re: Bug#428399: Fails to boot, cannot mount / partition: No such device

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 428399 important Bug#428399: Fails to boot, cannot mount / partition: No such device Severity set to `important' from `critical' > tags 428399 moreinfo Bug#428399: Fails to boot, cannot mount / partition: No such device There were no tags set.

Bug#428399: Fails to boot, cannot mount / partition: No such device

severity 428399 important tags 428399 moreinfo stop On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 02:48:07PM +0200, Pau Tallada Crespí wrote: > Package: initramfs-tools > Version: 0.88 > Severity: critical hmm works fine here, until bug is demonstrated, you don't make yourself friends with overly critical settings.

Bug#428431: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64: kernel oopses with XFS + device mapper (dm-crypt)

Package: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.21-4 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss I did nothing fancy like suspend or resume or anything, this was just a clean boot, working hacking, using mpd and listening to music, and that happened. Unable to remount my partiti

Bug#428363: apt - FTBFS: Unmet build dependencies: libcurl3-gnutls-dev (>= 7.15.5)

Bastian Blank wrote: Package: apt Version: 0.7.2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of apt_0.7.2 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 98 [...] dpkg-buildpackage: source package is apt dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.7.2 dpkg-bui

Bug#428435: swh-plugins_0.4.15-0.1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: bad compiler options

Package: swh-plugins Version: 0.4.15-0.1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of swh-plugins_0.4.15-0.1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98 > Build started at 20070611-1105 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package

Bug#427506: libnss-pgsql_1.4.0-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: Preprocessor syntax error

Am 2007-06-04 17:31:22, schrieb Wichert Akkerman: > I don't know who uploaded that version, but I'm no longer maintaining > this package. I was realy surprised about the upload to experimental and the error. Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Do

Bug#427506: libnss-pgsql_1.4.0-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: Preprocessor syntax error

Am 2007-06-07 00:02:59, schrieb Christian Bayle: > Some history, > > The project was inactive http://sf.net/projects/sysauth-pgsql > > Russell Smith added shadow support > and made some improvements on > http://pgfoundry.org/projects/sysauth/ And I use thi

Bug#427506: libnss-pgsql_1.4.0-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: Preprocessor syntax error

Hello Frank, Am 2007-06-04 18:19:59, schrieb Frank Lichtenheld: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:31:22PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > I don't know who uploaded that version, but I'm no longer maintaining > > this package. > > And how does that concern me? I didn't send that mail to you, I send

Bug#427562: forkbomb: Workaround and request for comment on documentation

On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 10:59:33PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > Hi, > > I've implemented a workaround, a special case for jadetex and xmltex, in > update-fontlang. Here's a first draft for the documentation part in > TeX-on-Debian: > > + > +A special case in update-fmtutil: > +

Bug#412142: marked as done (Upgrade from sarge to etch makes pipermail archives stop working)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:02:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#412142: fixed in mailman 1:2.1.9-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#421895: marked as done (mailman: upgrade fails with UnicodeDecodeError)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:02:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#412142: fixed in mailman 1:2.1.9-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#428431: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64: kernel oopses with XFS + device mapper (dm-crypt)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 428431 linux-2.6 Bug#428431: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64: kernel oopses with XFS + device mapper (dm-crypt) Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64' to `linux-2.6'. > forcemerge 410204 428431 Bug#410204: linux-image-2.6.18-4-am

Bug#428431: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64: kernel oopses with XFS + device mapper (dm-crypt)

reassign 428431 linux-2.6 forcemerge 410204 428431 thanks On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 06:37:49PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Jun 11 17:01:04 artemis kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer > dereference at RIP: > Jun 11 17:01:04 artemis kernel: [] page_to_pfn+0x0/0x33 Alr

Bug#428446: /usr/lib/ltsp/update-kernels wipes modified /opt/ltsp/i386/boot/pxelinux.cfg/default

Package: ltsp-client Version: 0.99debian11 Severity: serious --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Hi, I did modify my /opt/ltsp/i386/boot/pxelinux.cfg/default, cause my setup was only running with adding "nfsroot=/opt/ltsp/i386" to boot parameters. After running /usr/sbin/ltsp-upda

Bug#428450: binutils: [mips] ld segfaults

Package: binutils Version: 2.17.20070406cvs-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm a new maintainer, and I've found that one of my packages cannot be built on mips architecture because of ld segfaulting. The buildd log is

Processed: reassign 410204 to linux-2.6, forcibly merging 410204 428431

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > reassign 410204 linux-2.6 Bug#410204: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64: Data corruption on dm-crypt+XFS Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64' to `linux-2.6'. > forcemerg

Bug#422729: grub-of (Re: Please fix your RC bugs)

* Robert Millan [ackstorm] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070611 10:49]: > Please can you give grub-of a grace period? I plan to fix its RC bugs, but > can't right now because I don't have the hardware (I will have it very soon, > it's already ordered). If that is documented in the bug report, that usually

Bug#428376: marked as done (fische - FTBFS: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `prefetchw')

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#428376: fixed in fische 2.0~alpha3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#428340: marked as done (wrong conflicts/replaces of kile-i18n-* packages)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:32:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#428340: fixed in kile 1:1.9.3-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#423280: NMU uploaded

* Daniel Kobras ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070610 23:46]: > On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 07:28:02AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > I uploaded an NMU of your package. > > > > Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition. > > No need to emphasize which I'd never doubt anyway... We

Bug#423804: marked as done (libpod-webserver-perl: FTBFS: No such file or directory at /build/user/libpod-webserver-perl-3.04/blib/lib/Pod/Webserver.pm line 427.)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:32:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#425902: fixed in libpod-webserver-perl 3.04-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Bug#425902: marked as done (libpod-webserver-perl: FTBFS: Test failure)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:32:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#425902: fixed in libpod-webserver-perl 3.04-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Bug#427562: forkbomb: Workaround and request for comment on documentation

Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for dropping into the discussion so late. Is it reasonable to > treat any format which has an invocation line beginning with "&..." in > a similar way? Would that help to solve the problem more generally? Yes, yes, very well. If you do the codin

Bug#425928: More info on slony1 build failure

On Monday 11 June 2007 08:18:48 am Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 10.06.2007, 14:17 -0400 schrieb Daniel Schepler: > > Here's the output of `docbook2x-man --debug slony.xml' from > > doc/adminguide, in case it gives any clue what's going wrong: > > ... > > frobnitz:/tmp/buildd/slony1-1.2.9

Bug#425928: More info on slony1 build failure

Am Montag, den 11.06.2007, 17:34 -0400 schrieb Daniel Schepler: > On Monday 11 June 2007 08:18:48 am Daniel Leidert wrote: [..] > > I cannot reproduce the issue you describe - even not in a i386 pbuilder. > > On which architecture are you working? Can you post/attach the complete > > pbuilder buil

Bug#423280: NMU uploaded

Moi! On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 10:39:12PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > Actually, the original bug has been fixed in libxt-dev. (Curiously enough, S/390 still lists the current build as failed, referring to the same old bug, but providing no buildd log. Puzzled.) > However, build on ia64 revealed

Bug#425928: More info on slony1 build failure

On Monday 11 June 2007 18:06:13 pm Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Montag, den 11.06.2007, 17:34 -0400 schrieb Daniel Schepler: > > On Monday 11 June 2007 08:18:48 am Daniel Leidert wrote: > > [..] > > > > I cannot reproduce the issue you describe - even not in a i386 > > > pbuilder. On which architectu

Bug#425931: marked as done (source-highlight: FTBFS with new boost libraries)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#425931: fixed in source-highlight 2.4-5.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: RE: toshutils: FTBFS: hotkey.c:89:19: error: asm/io.h: No such file or directory

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package toshutils Ignoring bugs not assigned to: toshutils > severity 427598 minor Bug#427598: toshutils: FTBFS: hotkey.c:89:19: error: asm/io.h: No such file or directory Severity set to `minor' from `serious' > tags 427598 + unreproducible Bug#4275

Bug#427598: toshutils: FTBFS: hotkey.c:89:19: error: asm/io.h: No such file or directory

package toshutils severity 427598 minor tags 427598 + unreproducible thanks Lucas, You report that toshutils fails to build: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/06/01/toshutils_2.0.1-15_sid32.buildlog I think that your build environment may be broken. The specific error that causes the bu

Bug#227972: Last Mesage

Hello, Please get back to me immediately for necessary steps concerning your inheritance, Sequel to your non - reply of my earlier email to you dated 02/03/06. On behalf of the Trustees and Executors to the Will of your deceased relation in 2002, I wish to notify you that your name appeared

Bug#421488: closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#421488: fixed in ecj 3.2.2-2)

found 421488 3.2.2-1 fixed 421488 3.2.2-2 thanks On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 08:57:23PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > >* Loosen dependency on gij-4.1, libgcj7-jar. Closes: #421488. > > This will not help: > | $ sudo apt-get install ecj gij-

Processed: Re: Bug#421488: closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#421488: fixed in ecj 3.2.2-2)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 421488 3.2.2-1 Bug#421488: gcj-4.1 - FTBFS: Broken recursive build-deps Bug marked as found in version 3.2.2-1. > fixed 421488 3.2.2-2 Bug#421488: gcj-4.1 - FTBFS: Broken recursive build-deps Bug marked as fixed in version 3.2.2-2. > thanks Stop

Bug#426396: (no subject)

Is there any hope that this problem gets solved, allowing this version of the gnash library to enter testing? 'Cause the version present in testing is a plain joke. Thanks

Bug#309739: Last Mesage

Hello, Please get back to me immediately for necessary steps concerning your inheritance, Sequel to your non - reply of my earlier email to you dated 02/03/06. On behalf of the Trustees and Executors to the Will of your deceased relation in 2002, I wish to notify you that your name appeared

Bug#425436: marked as done (slime: Missing build-dependency)

Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#425436: fixed in slime 1:20070409-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#422397: #422397 is due to a missing #include

tag 422397 patch thanks Bug #422397 is caused by a missing #include in src/print.c --[PATCH]--- diff -r b271f6b92571 debian/changelog --- a/debian/changelog Mon Jun 11 23:42:48 2007 -0500 +++ b/debian/changelog Mon Jun 11 23:57:08 2007 -0500 @@ -1,3 +1,

Processed: #422397 is due to a missing #include

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 422397 patch Bug#422397: oregano: FTBFS: src/print.c:165: error: expected ';', ',' or ')' before '*' token There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#428087: Looks like an ABI change in SWT's native library

Changing /usr/share/java-config/libswt-3.2-java to reference /usr/lib/java/swt.jar rather than /usr/share/java/swt-gtk-3.2.1.jar doesn't make any difference on my system. Rather, the problem seems to be that Azureus is looking for "swt-pi-gtk-3235", but libswt3.2-gtk-jni now contains libswt-pi-gtk