Bug#421526: marked as done (/var/lib/gcj-4.1 missing; causes post-inst failure.)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:17:13 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#421526: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#421362: marked as done (gfortran-4.1: libgfortran.so symlink missing)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:17:13 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#421362: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#421171: marked as done (mksh: depends on removed libssp0 package)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:53:12 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in binNMUs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#421175: marked as done (sipsak: depends on removed libssp0 package)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:53:12 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in binNMUs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#421169: marked as done (kdesvn: depends on removed libssp0 package)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:53:12 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in binNMUs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#421566: vdrift: wrong architecture limitations in debian/control (alpha)

Steve Langasek wrote: > Package: vdrift > Version: 0.0.2006.10.06-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: release policy, "Packages must be supported on as many > architectures as is reasonably possible" > > Hi Gonéri, > > The vdrift package is marked as only being buildable on amd64, i386, ia64,

Bug#421579: openmpi_1.1-2.3: FTBFS: libibverbs-dev no longer depends on libsysfs-dev

Package: openmpi Version: 1.1-2.3 Severity: serious Tags: patch sid lenny Hi Florian, It looks like the just-uploaded 1.1-2.4 NMU now fails to build on most architectures, because openmpi has an undeclared build-dependency on libsysfs-dev which was indirectly satisfied before by libibverbs-dev, b

Bug#421579: marked as done (openmpi_1.1-2.3: FTBFS: libibverbs-dev no longer depends on libsysfs-dev)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:57:38 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#421579: openmpi_1.1-2.3: FTBFS: libibverbs-dev no longer depends on libsysfs-dev has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#421365: marked as done (binutils: FTBFS on arm)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:02:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#421365: fixed in binutils 2.17cvs20070426-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#421454: marked as done (shlibs broken for binutils)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:02:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#421454: fixed in binutils 2.17cvs20070426-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#421582: libimager-perl: buffer overflow when reading 8-bit compressed BMP files

Package: libimager-perl Version: 0.50-1 Severity: grave Tags: security patch Justification: user security hole I'm the upstream maintainer for the Imager perl module. The BMP reader in Imager 0.56 and earlier can cause a memory overflow in a malloced() buffer when reading an 8-bit/pixel compresse

Processed: Re: Bug#421488 closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#421488: fixed in ecj 3.2.2-2)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 421488 Bug#421488: gcj-4.1 - FTBFS: Broken recursive build-deps 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions. Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stoppin

Bug#421488: closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#421488: fixed in ecj 3.2.2-2)

reopen 421488 thanks On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 08:57:23PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >* Loosen dependency on gij-4.1, libgcj7-jar. Closes: #421488. This will not help: | $ sudo apt-get install ecj gij-4.1 libgcj7-0 | Reading package lists... Done | Building dependency tree... Done

Processed: severity of 420947 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > severity 420947 serious Bug#420947: FTBFS due to TeX Live transition Severity set to `serious' from `important' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#421566: vdrift: wrong architecture limitations in debian/control (alpha)

On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:16:13AM +0300, Eddy Petrișor wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > Package: vdrift > > Version: 0.0.2006.10.06-1 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: release policy, "Packages must be supported on as many > > architectures as is reasonably possible" > > > > Hi Gonéri,

Bug#421586: libconfig-general-perl: Undefined subroutine

Package: libconfig-general-perl Version: 2.33-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi! I hope reporting a grave bug is appropriate. Maybe I missed an important point. Anyway here is what I experienced when upgrading: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/downloads% sudo dpkg -i libconfig-ge

Processed: tagging 421539

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > # the replacement (claws-mail) is in the new queue, be patient. > tags 421539 confirmed pending Bug#421539: sylpheed-claws-gtk2: 2.6.0-1.1+b1 in sid not installable There were no tags

Processed: Re: Bug#421581: libc6: File conflict with a file from gtk-qt-engine

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 421581 gtk-qt-engine Bug#421581: libc6: File conflict with a file from gtk-qt-engine Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `gtk-qt-engine'. > severity 421581 grave Bug#421581: libc6: File conflict with a file from gtk-qt-engine Severity set t

Processed (with 1 errors): severity of 380195 is critical, reassign 380195 to glibc, forcibly merging 380195 421555

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > severity 380195 critical Bug#380195: libc6: snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%.20s", "hello") may fail Severity set to `critical' from `normal' > reassign 380195 glibc Bug#380195:

Processed: Re: coreutils: printf "%-1.25000000s" segfaults

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 421555 glibc Bug#421555: coreutils: printf "%-1.2500s" segfaults Bug reassigned from package `coreutils' to `glibc'. > severity 421555 critical Bug#421555: coreutils: printf "%-1.2500s" segfaults Severity set to `critical' from `import

Bug#421589: twm-music: depends on twm-data, which is only in experimental

Package: tmw-music Version: 0.0.20-1 Severity: serious Subject says all. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Everything you read in newspapers is absolutely true, except fo

Bug#421450: marked as done (fiaif: FTBFS: File `fancyheadings.sty' not found.)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#421450: fixed in fiaif 1.21.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processed: severity of 380195 is critical, reassign 380195 to glibc, forcibly merging 380195 421555

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > severity 380195 critical Bug#380195: libc6: snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%.20s", "hello") may fail Severity set to `critical' from `critical' > reassign 380195 glibc Bug#38019

Bug#421372: gnome-hearts: crashes at startup

Le samedi 28 avril 2007 à 14:34 +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont a écrit : > Package: gnome-hearts > Version: 0.1.3-2 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > > Hello, > > Starting gnome-hearts systematically yields this: > > **Error**: Couldn't recognize the image file f

Bug#421555: coreutils: printf "%-1.25000000s" segfaults

Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: coreutils > Version: 5.97-5.3 > Severity: important > > $ /usr/bin/printf '%-1.2500s\n' 'Hello' > > Is a quite good testcase :) > > FWIW libc printf seems to work properly. Further poking shows that it > may be locale-dependant as the f

Bug#421586: libconfig-general-perl: Undefined subroutine

On Monday 30 April 2007, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > Package: libconfig-general-perl > Version: 2.33-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Hi! Hi Christopher, > > I hope reporting a grave bug is appropriate. Maybe I missed an important > point. Anyway here is what I

Bug#416663: marked as done (depends on non-essential package debconf to be available on postrm)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:32:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#416663: fixed in boinc 5.8.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#420706: marked as done (python-gdal: undefined symbol: SWIG_MakePtr)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#420706: fixed in gdal 1.4.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#418833: marked as done (grass: Init.sh is broken)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:35:13 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 6.2.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#421372: marked as done (gnome-hearts: crashes at startup)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#421372: fixed in gnome-hearts 0.1.3-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Processed: Confirmation and full error output

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 421394 serious Bug#421394: postinst of pv fails Severity set to `serious' from `important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs data

Bug#421595: Please disallow Routing Header Type 0 by default (CVE-2007-2242)

Package: linux-2.6 Severity: grave Tags: security The IPv6 protocol allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted IPv6 type 0 route headers (IPV6_RTHDR_TYPE_0) that create network amplification between two routers. There was already a patch for 2.6.20.9 (010831ab8436dfd9304b2

Bug#421555: coreutils: printf "%-1.25000000s" segfaults

On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 01:17:57PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Package: coreutils > > Version: 5.97-5.3 > > Severity: important > > > > $ /usr/bin/printf '%-1.2500s\n' 'Hello' > > > > Is a quite good testcase :) > > > > FWIW libc printf see

Bug#421595: Please disallow Routing Header Type 0 by default (CVE-2007-2242)

On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 02:35:06PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Severity: grave > Tags: security > > > The IPv6 protocol allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via > crafted IPv6 type 0 route headers (IPV6_RTHDR_TYPE_0) that create network > amplification betw

Bug#420527: marked as done (ogdi-dfsg: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to create shared library.)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#420527: fixed in ogdi-dfsg 3.2.0~beta1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#421394: Confirmation and full error output

Le lundi 30 avril 2007 à 13:24 +0100, Matt Zimmerman a écrit : > severity 421394 serious > thanks > > Confirmed here. The cause seems to be that manual.html is missing from the > binary package entirely (at least the i386 build), though still referenced > by the .doc-base file. Hmmm weirdo. I no

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity #421586 normal Bug#421586: libconfig-general-perl: Undefined subroutine Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (ad

Bug#421605: enigma: Fails with undefined libzipios symbol

Package: enigma Version: 1.00-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After latest Sid upgrades (including libc6), enigma will fail after completing one board with an undefined libzipios symbol. Leaves screen at wrong setting if played full screen and mouse is eaten whether full

Bug#421606: sitecopy: Doesn't find all my site

Package: sitecopy Version: 1:0.16.3-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, This version only find the first site and forget the two others with the following command line (without error messages) : sitecopy -uoa sitecopy: Updating site `Free' (on debian.video.free.fr in /)

Bug#421607: FTBFS: needs to be updated to new libsnmp10-dev

Package: hplip Version: 1.6.10-3 Severity: serious The package build-deps need to be updated for new net-snmp, and it needs to be rebuild. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.48-deb

Bug#421394: Confirmation and full error output

On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 04:01:53PM +0200, Cedric Delfosse wrote: > Le lundi 30 avril 2007 à 13:24 +0100, Matt Zimmerman a écrit : > > severity 421394 serious > > thanks > > > > Confirmed here. The cause seems to be that manual.html is missing from the > > binary package entirely (at least the i38

Processed: Re: Bug#421605: enigma: Fails with undefined libzipios symbol

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > block 421605 by 421498 Bug#421498: Breaks enigma, binary incompatible, seems unable to re-read files Bug#421605: enigma: Fails with undefined libzipios symbol Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs of 421605 added: 421498 > thanks Stopping processi

Bug#421605: enigma: Fails with undefined libzipios symbol

block 421605 by 421498 thanks Hi, This is supposedly fixed when #421498 hits your mirror. I havn't got the fixed package yet either, so I can't verify it. > After latest Sid upgrades (including libc6), enigma will fail after > completing one board with an undefined libzipios symbol. Leaves screen

Processed: reassign 421581 to gtk-qt-engine

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > reassign 421581 gtk-qt-engine Bug#421581: libc6: File conflict with a file from gtk-qt-engine Bug reassigned from package `gtk-qt-engine' to `gtk-qt-engine'. > End of message, stoppi

Bug#421607: marked as done (FTBFS: needs to be updated to new libsnmp10-dev)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#421607: fixed in hplip 1.6.10-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processed: Re: Bug#421362 closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#421362: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-5)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 421362 Bug#421362: gfortran-4.1: libgfortran.so symlink missing 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions. Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stoppin

Bug#421362: closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#421362: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-5)

reopen 421362 thanks >* gfortran-4.1: Depend on libgfortran1, provide the libgfortran.so > symlink. Closes: #421362. It seems the symlink is in /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.1/libgfortran.so, which it doesn't seem to be using. It's should be 4.1.3 instead of 4.1? I still get a failed

Bug#415721: marked as done (bzr-svn: Requires newer bzr than is available)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:34:20 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Processed (with 1 errors): severity of 421494 is serious, merging 421494 420353

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > severity 421494 serious Bug#421494: imagemagick: package uninstallable Severity set to `serious' from `grave' > merge 421494 420353 Bug#420353: libmagick9: Uninstallable in sid Bug#4

Bug#418833: marked as done (grass: Init.sh is broken)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:02:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#418833: fixed in grass 6.2.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed (with 1 errors): reassign 421494 to imagemagick, forcibly merging 421494 420353

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > reassign 421494 imagemagick Bug#421494: imagemagick: package uninstallable Bug reassigned from package `imagemagick' to `imagemagick'. > forcemerge 421494 420353 Bug#421494: imagemag

Bug#352575: marked as done (display file:/// deletes its file)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#352575: fixed in imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#325651: marked as done (ale: unable to open image `[mangled file name]': No such file or directory.)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325651: fixed in imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#318176: marked as done (imagemagick in combination with transcode fails (amd64))

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325720: fixed in imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#325651: marked as done (ale: unable to open image `[mangled file name]': No such file or directory.)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318176: fixed in imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#318176: marked as done (imagemagick in combination with transcode fails (amd64))

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325651: fixed in imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#325720: marked as done (File read error)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325720: fixed in imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#421635: php5-common 5.2.0-8+etch3 not built on arm, hppa, mips and mipsel

Package: php5-common Version: 5.2.0-8+etch1 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole php5-common is not built/uploaded for Etch on arm, hppa, mips and mipsel (php5 itself is at 5.2.0-8+etch3). This leaves these architectures vulnerable to the issues mentioned in DSA 12

Bug#318176: marked as done (imagemagick in combination with transcode fails (amd64))

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318176: fixed in imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#330666: marked as done (Needs Conflicts:/Replaces: libmagick6-dev)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#330666: fixed in imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#325720: marked as done (File read error)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325651: fixed in imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#420947: ethiop: FTBFS due to TeX Live transition

user Debian TeX maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> usertags 420947 depends-on-tetex-base tags 420947 patch thanks Patch: Just drop the useless Build-Dep on tetex-base Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer

Bug#385062: marked as done (CVE-2006-3743/-3744: ImageMagick XCF and Sun Rasterfile Buffer Overflows)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#385062: fixed in imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#383314: marked as done (libmagick9: Buffer overflow in SGI parser [CVE-2006-4144])

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#383314: fixed in imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#401047: marked as done (imagemagick: [AMD64] FTBFS with recent libpng.)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#401047: fixed in imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: ethiop: FTBFS due to TeX Live transition

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > user Debian TeX maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > usertags 420947 depends-on-tetex-base Bug#420947: FTBFS due to TeX Live transition There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: depends-on-tetex-base.

Bug#325720: marked as done (File read error)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318176: fixed in imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#345595: marked as done (libmagick: array index overflow in DisplayImageCommand)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#345595: fixed in imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#325651: marked as done (ale: unable to open image `[mangled file name]': No such file or directory.)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325720: fixed in imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#410435: marked as done (imagemagick: Buffer overflow vulnerability in PALM coder. (CVE-2007-0770))

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#410435: fixed in imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#345238: marked as done ([CVE-2005-4601] Shell command injection in delegate code (via file names))

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#345238: fixed in imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#420353: marked as done (libmagick9: Uninstallable in sid)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#420353: fixed in imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#214623: marked as done ([NONFREE-DATA:UNMODFIABLE] Non-free logo included in source)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#214623: fixed in imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#345876: marked as done ([CVE-2006-0082] imagemagick: New format string vulnerability in SetImageInfo().)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#345876: fixed in imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#419587: marked as done (hardinfo - FTBFS: error: arch/this/battery.h: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#419587: fixed in hardinfo 0.4.2.1.svn30042007-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Bug#418057: marked as done (CVE-2007-1797: integer overflows in DCM image decoder)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:17:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#418057: fixed in imagemagick 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#421635: marked as done (php5-common 5.2.0-8+etch3 not built on arm, hppa, mips and mipsel)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:49:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [php-maint] Bug#421635: php5-common 5.2.0-8+etch3 not built on arm, hppa, mips and mipsel has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#421643: texlive-base: [dummy bug] Should not go into testing unless the maintainers decide so

Package: texlive-base Version: 2007-4 Severity: serious There are still a lot of issues in other packages in sid and lenny which would break many TeX installations in lenny, should texlive 2007 go into testing. Currently, according to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=texlive-base i

Bug#421362: closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#421362: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-5)

Kurt Roeckx writes: > reopen 421362 > thanks > > >* gfortran-4.1: Depend on libgfortran1, provide the libgfortran.so > > symlink. Closes: #421362. > > It seems the symlink is in > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.1/libgfortran.so, which it doesn't seem > to be using. It's should be 4.1.3

Bug#421362: closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#421362: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-5)

On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 05:45:07PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > reopen 421362 > thanks > > >* gfortran-4.1: Depend on libgfortran1, provide the libgfortran.so > > symlink. Closes: #421362. > > It seems the symlink is in > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.1/libgfortran.so, which it doesn't

Bug#421518: mksh build problems

unblock 421518 by 408850 reassign 408850 gcc retitle 408850 using flags "-fwhole-program --combine" broken thanks Hi all, thanks to Steve Langasek I now know that the “conflicting prototypes” issues for the mksh package appear due to use of the gcc flags “-fwhole-program --combine” which, suppose

Processed: Re: mksh build problems

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > unblock 421518 by 408850 Bug#408850: conflicting stat prototypes on alpha Bug#421518: FTBFS (alpha): conflicting types for 'stat' Was blocked by: 408850 Blocking bugs of 421518 removed: 408850 > reassign 408850 gcc Bug#408850: conflicting stat prototyp

Bug#421659: cpio: mt does not report tape status and hangs if the drive is empty

Package: cpio Version: 2.7-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Using the cpio 2.6-17 stable version of mt, I can do the following: With a tape in the drive: root> /bin/mt -f /dev/nst0 status drive type = Generic SCSI-2 tape drive status = 1241513984 sense

Bug#421494: imagemagick: package uninstallable

reassign 421494 libmagick9 close 421494 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 merge 420353 421494 thanks On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 07:08:12PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: > This package is uninstallable because libjasper-1.701-1 has been > removed and replaced by libjasper1. Messed up the merge of this report befo

Processed: Re: Bug#421494: imagemagick: package uninstallable

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 421494 libmagick9 Bug#421494: imagemagick: package uninstallable Bug reassigned from package `imagemagick' to `libmagick9'. > close 421494 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1 Bug#421494: imagemagick: package uninstallable 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.d

Bug#413370: marked as done (libssp32, libssp64 removed in experimental)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:17:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#413370: fixed in glibc 2.5-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#421173: marked as done (nscd: depends on removed libssp0 package)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:17:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#413370: fixed in glibc 2.5-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#421666: FTBFS: chmod: cannot access `/home/sam/src/seahorse/seahorse-1.0.1/debian/seahorse/usr/bin/seahorse-daemon': No such file or directory

Package: seahorse Version: 1.0.1-2+b1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 seahorse FTBFS when I tried to built it for debugging: $ fakeroot debian/rules binary DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt,nostrip ... make[2]: Entering directory

Bug#86306: Best friends!!!!

Chut je nejmene vyvinutym kocicim smyslem. Compliments, You may tempt feme covert with big? Look WWW * RXSHOP1 * NET. Replace * with . jako u vsech predatoru je relativne kratsi nez v 70. letech minuleho stoleti objevit krystal velky 12 pes. Ma 200 milionu cichovych receptoru, ktere jsou

Bug#421659: cpio: mt does not report tape status and hangs if the drive is empty

> Using the cpio 2.6-17 stable version of mt, I can do the following: [...] > Using the cpio 2.7-1 testing version of mt, I get this: [...] > > In addition, using the 2.7-1 mt has resulted in the drive requesting > the cleaning tape after most uses (60+%). This behavior did not occur > prior to u

Bug#418350: marked as done (pppconfig: missing Replaces: manpages-fr (<< 2.39.1-5))

Your message dated Tue, 01 May 2007 00:02:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#418350: fixed in pppconfig 2.3.16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#421684: unhandled exception in callback for any feed

Package: yarssr Version: 0.2.2-1 Severity: grave --- Please enter the report below this line. --- (0)% rm -rf .yarssr # just to be sure... (0)% yarssr # yarssr starts fine and sits itself in the KDE tray. I right-click # on it, bring up Preferences, and click on the "New" icon. I add the # nam

Bug#348645: Reopen 348645

Contrary to its being marked "Fixed" this error still appears on my system every time I apt-get upgrade. Here's a cut-and-paste: Setting up postfix (2.4.0-2) ... Postfix configuration was untouched. If you need to make changes, edit /etc/postfix/main.cf (and others) as needed. To view Postfix

Bug#420875: fixed in 2.6.20-1

Version: 2.6.20-1 CVE-2007-1734 was fixed in 2.6.20.5 which was included in 2.6.20-1. CVE-2007-1497 was fixed in 2.6.20.3, also included in 2.6.20-1. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#420875: marked as done (Linux Kernel NULL Pointer Dereferences and Security Bypass)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:25:52 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in 2.6.20-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#421689: banshee hangs during start

Package: banshee Version: 0.11.2+dfsg-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Banshee fails to start up. Upon start, I get the splash screen and the progress bar gets about half-way, then nothing more ever happens. Running from a console, I see the following output, that looks

Bug#421415: ldirectord: Ldirectord crashed because of missing dep on libmail-pop3client-perl

Thanks, I'll get this fixed in the next release. -- Horms H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#409191: marked as done (prosper: Missed dependency to texlive-latex-recommended)

Your message dated Tue, 01 May 2007 03:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#409191: fixed in prosper 1.00.4+cvs.2007.05.01-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#421606: sitecopy: Doesn't find all my site

On 4/30/07, Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Package: sitecopy Version: 1:0.16.3-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, This version only find the first site and forget the two others with the following command line (without error messages) : sitecopy -uoa s

Bug#421015: openafs - module not buildable against 2.6.18-4, 2.6.20-1

retitle 421015 openafs-modules-source: [s390] will not compile due to GPL-only uaccess tags 421015 =help thanks Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: openafs > Version: 1.4.4.dfsg1-2 > Severity: serious > openafs is not buildable against 2.6.18-4 and 2.6.20-1. > | > [...]/opena

  1   2   >