Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 12:27:56AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> reassign 421173 glibc
Bug#421173: nscd: depends on removed libssp0 package
Bug reassigned from package `nscd' to `glibc'.
> reassign
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 12:27:56AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
reassign 421173 glibc
reassign 413370 glibc
forcemerge 421173 413370
thanks
# gee ...
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:34:11PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > Package: nscd
> > Version: 2.5-4
> > Severity: grave
> >
> > Your package
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 23:21 +0200, Martin wrote:
> Package: quodlibet
> Version: 0.23.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Quod Libet fails to start, pops up a message saying "Quod Libet could
> not find the 'files
Your message dated Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:48:30 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 0.26.dfsg-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Your message dated Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:48:30 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 0.26.dfsg-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 23:21 +0200, Martin wrote:
> Package: quodlibet
> Version: 0.23.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Quod Libet fails to start, pops up a message saying "Quod Libet could
> not find the 'files
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421051: fixed in abiword 2.4.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: transmission
Version: 0.6.1.dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.1
transmission-cli and transmission-gtk both include files which were part
of transmission up to 0.6.1.dfsg-1, so they must Replace that package.
Otherwise, dpkg just barfs when upgrading.
-- System Informatio
Package: binutils
Version: 2.17cvs20070426-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Fails to build from source
binutils 2.17cvs20070426-1 fails to build from source on hppa:
Automatic build of binutils_2.17cvs20070426-1 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 98
Build started at 20070426-1937
Thorsten Glaser writes:
> Why is that library gone and/or how is ProPolice SSP in gcc 4.1+ then
> supposed to work without it?
>
> If the __guard_setup() and __stack_smash_handler() functions are now
> contained in libc, a simple recompile is in fact enough.
Please ask the gcc and/or glibc mainta
James Troup a écrit :
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.5-4
> Severity: serious
>
> | Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.6.ds1-11 (using
> .../archives/libc6_2.5-4_arm.deb) ...
> | Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
> | dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.5-4_arm.deb
> (--unpack):
> | d
Hi,
I am going to reopen this bug because now that libssp0 has been removed
from Debian, nscd is not installable:
# apt-get install nscd
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situati
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 409288
Bug#409288: nscd: does not start because of missing libssp.so.0
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
101 - 113 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
