Bug#403405: can't reproduce

2007-01-12 Thread James McCaw
Hi On 11/01/07, dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hey James, Can you provide a log of the errors you get when loading raw1394? I'm unable to reproduce with 2.6.18-8. gscanbus works fine for me; granted, I don't actually have any devices on my bus (I don't own any). Everything worked fi

Bug#406587: init and telinit can reveal root pass on return from runlevel 1

2007-01-12 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hi, Samuel Thibault, le Fri 12 Jan 2007 10:44:04 +0100, a écrit : > Grant Thomas, le Thu 11 Jan 2007 21:17:40 -0600, a écrit : > > I have the same problem as Lewis Stoddart above, with a small difference. > > > > My machine gives the bash error when the username is supplied. > > I do not receive

Bug#406455: libpango1.0-0: 32bit libpango must use /usr/lib32/pango/1.5.0/module-files.d

2007-01-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 08:19:18PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > As for using /usr/lib32 on i386 that is totaly up to you. On i386 > /usr/lib32 does not yet exist but I don't see a reason not to create > it. Note that you can't have system libraries in /usr/lib32 since it > is not a default

Bug#405977: [SPONSORING] Bug fix release of hunspell-uz

2007-01-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 01:38:37AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > then, you don't need to send the copy to the BTS, a private mail to me > is actually enough. For RC bugfixes, it's beneficial to cc: the bug report when requesting sponsorship so that others who track the RC bugs know an updated pac

Processed: severity of 406674 is serious

2007-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > # obviously usable in interpreted mode per bug report, so at most "serious" > severity 406674 serious Bug#406674: libghc6-time-dev: Undefined references in link time Severity set to `

Bug#406378: gnucash: GnuCash crashes when I open an account register

2007-01-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 09:38:18PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2007, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > If the package does not build properly on a normal system, under the > > circumstances you describe, that means there is a bug. > > It does not mean that the correct fix for the bug

Processed: your mail

2007-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 399226 + patch Bug#399226: yacas has rpath to insecure location (/tmp/yacas/usr/bin/yacas) Tags were: security Tags added: patch > Thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrato

Bug#406639: fontforge-doc: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/showttf.1.gz', which is also in package fontforge

2007-01-12 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Kęstutis Biliūnas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > tags 406639 pending > thanks > > Pn, 2007 01 12 15:18 +0100, Soeren Sonnenburg rašė: > > > trying to install both, fontforge+fontforge doc results in this: > > > dpkg: error processing > > /var/cache/apt/archives/fontforge-doc_0.0.20061220-1_all.

Bug#397973: Processed: upping severity, as discussed with Steve ...

2007-01-12 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 12 January 2007 17:58, Sven Luther wrote: > 12:18 < vorlon> fjp: I would think that not being able to do a RAID > install should be considered RC these days, do you disagree? > > What else is there to say ... I am not going to fight this war, but I also refuse to treat this BR as RC for

Bug#404555: May I upload dfsbuild to testing-proposed-updates?

2007-01-12 Thread Steve Langasek
John, On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:13:01AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:51:09AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > > John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I have prepared an update to dfsbuild that fixes 2 RC bugs: #404563 and > > > #404555. > > If your final

Bug#403345: patch for 2.0.2+20060303-4.1

2007-01-12 Thread Daigo Moriwaki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, release team, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Stefan Fritsch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061228 02:43]: >> The patch in 2.1.4-6 does not apply cleanly to 2.0.2+20060303-4.1 . I >> extracted the attached patch from 2.0.4. I have prepared to upload tdiary_2.0.2

<    1   2