tags 404751 + sarge
thanks
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 12:37:24AM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Package: proftpd
> Version: 1.2.10-15sarge3
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> According to
>
> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16535
>
> the proftpd in sarge
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:32:26 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404751: CVE-2005-4816: Buffer overflow in mod_radius in
ProFTPD
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Version: 5.2.3-0.8
Distribution: experimental
Jean-Charles, except #404140, do you see any other bug to be fixed before
uploading this sympa package to unstable ?
Any other tester ?
Stefan
hello,
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > I'm more than willing to help test a kernel package, but I'll be on
> > [VAC] from 2006-12-23 to 2007-01-03 inclusive. So, please do not
> > release Etch just now :)
>
> I have ordered an nx6325, which sho
tag 404756 experimental
thanks
Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 00:41 +, Sam Morris a écrit :
> Package: gnome-control-center
> Version: 1:2.16.2-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: breaks user config
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Having compiled & installed the packa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 404756 experimental
Bug#404756: gnome-control-center: "Error activating XKB configuration" when
logging on
There were no tags set.
Tags added: experimental
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:21:39 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404724: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686: can't compile kernel
modules, incompatible with gcc 4.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 404234 important
Bug#404234: CVE-2006-6669: WebCalendar XSS
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 370132 5.2.3-6
Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults upon first query [ia64 & s390]
Bug marked as found in version 5.2.3-6.
> retitle 370132 snmpd segfaults upon first query [s390]
Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults upon first query [ia64 & s390]
Changed Bug titl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> # valid for a ROM flashing tool to FTBFS on s390 :)
> severity 404342 important
Bug#404342: flashrom - FTBFS: warning: implicit declaration of function 'iopl'
Severity set to `importa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 404662 dwww
Bug#404662: iceweasel: creates /usr/share/firefox symlink
Bug reassigned from package `iceweasel' to `dwww'.
> severity 404662 serious
Bug#404662: iceweasel: creates /usr/share/firefox symlink
Severity set to `serious' from `import
found 370132 5.2.3-6
retitle 370132 snmpd segfaults upon first query [s390]
thanks
>>> I just tested 5.2.3-4 which doesn't expose this bug, cool!
>> Thanks for the report. However, i leave this bug open until the s390 buildd
>> is fixed
>> and a corrected s390 binary has been uploaded.
>
> Thank
severity 404234 important
thanks
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 06:51:46PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Package: webcalendar
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
> A vulnerability has been found in webcalender:
> Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in export_han
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 06:52:06PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 03:40:58AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > I have reviewed the information available on the thermal problems with
> > > HP laptops, and it appears that there is a fairly conservative set of
> > > patche
Resolved. The reason turned out to be filesystem corruption in my
chroot. How did it happed, that's another question.
Sorry for the late followup, in the meantime I had hardware problems.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
hello,
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 09:46:04PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
>
> At Jurij's request, I've tried out his patch. It seems to work
> perfectly here (HP nc6120) , and fixes the "no fans after suspend"
> problem of #400488.
forgot to ask you to for the ouput of dmidecode and acpidump.
for t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 370132
Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults upon first query [s390]
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing he
* Jochen Friedrich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061228 10:58]:
> found 370132 5.2.3-6
> retitle 370132 snmpd segfaults upon first query [s390]
> thanks
>
> >>> I just tested 5.2.3-4 which doesn't expose this bug, cool!
> >> Thanks for the report. However, i leave this bug open until the s390
> >> buildd
At 1167261963 time_t, Anibal Avelar wrote:
> Hi. I have a question. I hope not be obvious.
>
> I tried to reproduce the bug about upx error, but I couldn't.
>
> What was the conditions under it should be proved?
>
> I have i386/unstable with kernel 2.6.16 and 2.6.17 and I can't see it.
Still fa
> Your message dated Wed, 27 Dec 2006 17:47:02 +
> with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> and subject line Bug#403994: fixed in aub 2.2.1
> has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
>
> This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
> If this is not the case it
The patch in 2.1.4-6 does not apply cleanly to 2.0.2+20060303-4.1 . I
extracted the attached patch from 2.0.4.
21_20061210_eRuby_Injection.dpatch
Description: application/shellscript
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> found 404009 1.9.0.2-4
Bug#404009: file conflict between slang-slirp and slang
Bug marked as found in version 1.9.0.2-4.
> reassign 404010 slang-slirp
Bug#404010: file conflicts betw
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> # forward maintainer request
> retitle 404476 postinst does not deal correctly with sockets/pipes in
> subdirectories of /dev
Bug#404476: Not able to install udev
Changed Bug title.
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354355: fixed in sympa 5.2.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404140: fixed in sympa 5.2.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> # not ported, not RC
> severity 404517 important
Bug#404517: purelibc_0.2-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing definitions?
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, s
Package: gdb
Version: 6.3-6
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
We are currently running our program with gdb inside a screen. Every night
we restart it by running kill -9 on both the screen and gdb pids. This
results in a kernel crash.
A screenshot from the console output
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 404416 important
Bug#404416: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: pc working very slow with new kernel
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing he
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 02:55:26 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404484: gcompris: FTBFS on ia64 - needs build-dep on
libasound2-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 02:56:57 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404500: missing dependency against perl-modules (fixed in
sid)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 03:01:37 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404634: copyright file missing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 404377 normal
Bug#404377: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please con
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 404775 -security
Bug#404775: iceweasel: upgrade fails from 2.0+dfsg-1 to 2.0.0.1+dfsg-1
There were no tags set.
Tags removed: security
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 03:30:48 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404801: Kill -9 on gdb processs results in a kernel krash.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 10:32:37PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Marco Nenciarini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061217 03:25]:
> > tags 403056 + pending
>
> When can we expect an upload of the next version of wengophone? Or
> should I just upload the fix as NMU for now?
>
I'm testing it just now.
Bye
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 241931 grave
Bug#241931: pingus: Weird colors on powerpc arch (clanlib issue?)
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:12:01 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line zope-book: FTBFS: SyntaxError: Invalid syntax. Assignment to
None.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 08:03:29PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Noah Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061218 19:41]:
> > Our options would seem to be to revise the release notes
> > to no longer suggest upgrading aptitude before dist-upgrade, or
> > including an initrd-tools package that doesn't c
Hi,
For checking a bit more whether the bug is in pingus or clanlib/etc,
could you check other games that use it? (clanbomber and trophy)
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing, as the package has been removed from unstable (long overdue, too).
A slightly newer, although not completely updated, version of the book
is available at:
http://www.plope.com/Books/2_7Edition
(Also see: http://www.zope.org/Documentation/Books/ZopeBook/)
Note: the 2.7 book is also p
Hello,
Please find libuser-0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2.diff as an attachment.
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
http://v7w.com/anibal
interdiff -z -p1 ../libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.1.diff.gz
../libuser_0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2.diff.gz
diff -u libuser-0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1/debian/rules
libuser-0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1/d
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.18-3-amd64
Severity: grave
Justification: renders system unusable
I've just installed Debian Etch for amd64. The boot process sleep 2
times for about 5 minutes. My usb device doesn't work, they aren't
powered. My motherboard is an Asus A8V Deluxe. I've used a lot o
Package: gnome-control-center
Version: 1:2.16.2-2
Severity: serious
File: /usr/bin/gnome-mouse-properties
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
None of the mouse-related options seem to have any effect:
* Left-handed mouse
* Pointer Theme
* Locate Pointer
* Acceleration
* Sensitivit
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404020: fixed in libuser 1:0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404020: fixed in libuser 1:0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Package: prboom
Version: 2:2.4.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1
It has been brought bto my attention that prboom's
prboom.wad contains sprites taken from the commercial ID
software game Wolfenstein 3D (the dog sprites, DOGS*) and
resources derived from copyright material taken from
You might want to read this regarding the license issue:
http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/articles/2006/12/20/lets-hear-the-communitys-voice-the-faad-2-5-licensing-issue
I also tried to contact ahead a few times in the past with absolutely no
answer. As you might've noticed I'm maintaining
Can you provide more info about this alleged bug?
If not then it should be downgraded or closed.
If you need more help with debugging you can find me on IRC.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: clanbomber
Version: 1.05cdbs-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
On powerpc and sparc architectures where I have tried it, clanbomber
takes 99% of CPU and does not display anything but a blackscreen (the
X window is frozen and not refreshed).
It is impossible t
Hi,
sorry that nobody contacted you for such a long time.
* jacob kuenzel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061220 18:50]:
> I just did a fresh install from the stable netinst iso and then
> dist-upgraded to unstable. Now when I try to aptitude update or
> apt-get update, I get a crash:
does this error still
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64
Version: 2.6.18-8
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Hi,
at first: if the severity may seem inflated feel free to adjust it.
Well start with the easy things: my hardware is an old Sun Ultra 5. I
added an USB 2.0 controll
Hi,
Thanks for the hints.
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 12:37:53PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> For checking a bit more whether the bug is in pingus or clanlib/etc,
> could you check other games that use it? (clanbomber and trophy)
I have checked clanbomber on powerpc and sparc etch. It freezes in
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 02:38:47PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Can you provide more info about this alleged bug?
What more information do you want ? I think you said this was in the camp of
upstream now ? And you asked me to contact them. Which admitelly i have not
yet done, but which i also beli
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061228 02:08]:
> * Jochen Friedrich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061228 10:58]:
> > found 370132 5.2.3-6
> > retitle 370132 snmpd segfaults upon first query [s390]
> > thanks
> >
> > >>> I just tested 5.2.3-4 which doesn't expose this bug, cool!
> > >> Thanks for the r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andreas,
> Please allow me another remark - I think you should by way force
> configure to use sane values. Otherwise, you get errors like in
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=net-snmp&ver=5.2.3-6&arch=powerpc&stamp=1166829254&file=log
> wi
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061228 06:20]:
> * Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061228 02:08]:
> > * Jochen Friedrich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061228 10:58]:
> > > found 370132 5.2.3-6
> > > retitle 370132 snmpd segfaults upon first query [s390]
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > >>> I just tested 5.
Hi,
Frederic Lehobey, le Thu 28 Dec 2006 14:57:02 +0100, a écrit :
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 12:37:53PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > For checking a bit more whether the bug is in pingus or clanlib/etc,
> > could you check other games that use it? (clanbomber and trophy)
>
> I have checked
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andreas,
> The attached patch makes sure we don't mind about that anymore (though
> that is a bad patch, configure should have an option like
> --mtab=/etc/mtab or so).
The attached patch adds a configure option "--with-mnttab=". Maybe
it's a good
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 04:00:53AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 08:03:29PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Noah Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061218 19:41]:
> > > Our options would seem to be to revise the release notes
> > > to no longer suggest upgrading aptitude befo
reassign 404828 libclanlib2
severity 404828 important
tag 404828 upstream confirmed
merge 404828 335886
thanks
Hi Frederic,
Frederic Daniel Luc Lehobey [2006-12-28 14:38 +0100]:
> On powerpc and sparc architectures where I have tried it, clanbomber
> takes 99% of CPU and does not display anything
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity #403566 grave
Bug#403566: psad doesn't start because /usr/lib/psad doesn't exist
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 404828 libclanlib2
Bug#404828: clanbomber: unusable on sparc and powerpc (clanlib issue?)
Bug reassigned from package `clanbomber' to `libclanlib2'.
> severity 404828 important
Bug#404828: clanbomber: unusable on sparc and powerpc (clanlib iss
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:19:45 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391601: fixed in iputils 3:20020927-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 11:40:20 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404631: missing files under /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:48:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:52:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line vpopmail removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:48:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:47:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:05:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:52:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line vpopmail removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:50:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:53:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:52:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line vpopmail removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:52:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line vpopmail removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:55:07 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:58:02 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:52:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line vpopmail removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:48:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:45:54 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:52:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line vpopmail removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:06:17 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:52:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line vpopmail removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:50:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:59:26 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:52:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line vpopmail removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:48:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:55:07 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:52:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line vpopmail removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:57:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 404662 patch
Bug#404662: iceweasel: creates /usr/share/firefox symlink
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:08:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
tags 404662 patch
thanks
Here's a patch for this bug, together with three other hunks that should
go into an NMU (restart apache properly, remove webserver configuration
snippet properly, and spanish debconf translation update).
I'm not going to NMU this myself, unless requested by the maintain
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:57:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:07:07 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:52:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line vpopmail removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:57:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:07:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:56:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:21:19 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:22:32 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
1 - 100 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
