Bug#404025: file conflict between libmeep-dev and libmeep-mpi-dev

Package: libmeep-mpi-dev Version: 0.10-1 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both libmeep-dev and libmeep-mpi-dev ship `/usr/lib/pkgconfig/meep.pc' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing

Bug#404020: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils

Package: id-utils Version: 3.2d-11 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both id-utils and libuser ship `/usr/share/man/man1/lid.1.gz' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/ap

Bug#404023: file conflicts between interchange and libbusiness-ups-perl

Package: libbusiness-ups-perl Version: 1.13-4 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both interchange and libbusiness-ups-perl ship `/usr/share/man/man3/Business::UPS.3pm.gz' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment:

Bug#404022: file conflicts between interchange and libbusiness-ups-perl

Package: interchange Version: 5.4.1-1 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both interchange and libbusiness-ups-perl ship `/usr/share/man/man3/Business::UPS.3pm.gz' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg:

Bug#404021: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils

Package: libuser Version: 1:0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.1 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both id-utils and libuser ship `/usr/share/man/man1/lid.1.gz' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing

Bug#404024: file conflict between libmeep-dev and libmeep-mpi-dev

Package: libmeep-dev Version: 0.10-1 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both libmeep-dev and libmeep-mpi-dev ship `/usr/lib/pkgconfig/meep.pc' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /va

Bug#404028: file conflict between synce-kde and vdccm

Package: synce-kde Version: 0.9.1-1+b1 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both synce-kde and vdccm ship `/usr/bin/vdccm' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/

Bug#404029: file conflict between synce-kde and vdccm

Package: vdccm Version: 0.9.3-1 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both synce-kde and vdccm ship `/usr/bin/vdccm' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/vdccm_0.

Bug#404027: file conflict between openmpi-dev and pgapack

Package: pgapack Version: 1.0.0.1-4.2 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both openmpi-dev and pgapack ship `/usr/include/mpi.h' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/ar

Bug#404026: file conflict between openmpi-dev and pgapack

Package: openmpi-dev Version: 1.1-2.2 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both openmpi-dev and pgapack ship `/usr/include/mpi.h' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/ar

Processed: severity of 403874 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > # wrong & unsatisfiable dependencies > severity 403874 serious Bug#403874: ghextris: depends on python, uses #! /usr/bin/python2.3 Severity set to `serious' from `grave' > End of mes

Bug#404023: interchange should not ship Business::UPS but depend on it

hi, after some investigation it seems like interchange ships Business::UPS: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/qa$ dpkg -c interchange_5.4.1-1_amd64.deb | grep Business drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-06-07 15:07 ./usr/lib/interchange/auto/Business/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-06-07 15:07 ./us

Processed: setting package to ndisc6, tagging 404007

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > package ndisc6 Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ndisc6 > tags 404007 + pending Bug#404007: file conflict between ndisc6 and sofia-sip-bin There were no tags set. Tags added: pending >

Processed: severity

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 403974 normal Bug#403974: loop-aes-source: build error on kernel 2.6.20-rc1 Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admini

Bug#403776: kdm seems to violate FHS

hi, please take a look at another related bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=403797 to resume: > Some changes have been done in theme handling. Please take a look > at /usr/share/doc/kdm/README.Debian > desktop-base installs /etc/default/kdm.d/10_desktop-base . It over

Processed: found 403952 in 0.28-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > found 403952 0.28-1 Bug#403952: rlwrap: empty package on several architectures [sudo and $(PWD)] Bug marked as found in version 0.28-1. > End of message, stopping processing here. P

Bug#404000: file conflict between libpeercast0-dev and gnome-peercast

Le jeudi 21 décembre 2006 07:55, Michael Ablassmeier a écrit : > hi, Hi ! > both gnome-peercast and ibpeercast0-dev  ship  usr/lib/libpeercast.a' but > do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same > environment: Gnome peercast ship a customised peercast serve

Bug#403937: marked as done (tkinfo: contains a file in /usr/X11R6/include/X11/)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#403937: fixed in tkinfo 2.8-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: severity of 403896 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > severity 403896 important Bug#403896: screen: copyright file is not up-to-date Severity set to `important' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#404000: file conflict between libpeercast0-dev and gnome-peercast

hi, On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:33:42AM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote: > Ok, I'll add a conflict on libpeercast0-dev ASAP. > But to me, gnome-peercast should not ship any libpeercast.a since no one is > supposed to link staticaly on libpeercast using gnome-peercast... indeed, if there is no reason

Bug#404012: file conflicts between z80asm and z88dk-bin

On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 08:20:21AM +0100, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: > Package: z88dk-bin > Version: 1.6.ds1-1 > Severity: serious > Justfication: file conflicts between packages > > hi, > > both z80asm and z88dk-bin ship `/usr/share/man/man1/z80asm.1.gz' but do > not conflict or add a diversio

Bug#403999: file conflict between ggzd and gz-game-servers

Am Donnerstag, 21. Dezember 2006 07:53 schrieb Michael Ablassmeier: > both ggz-game-servers and ggzd ship etc/ggzd/rooms/entry.room but do not > conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same > environment: Neither a conflict nor a diversion is the right solution. Instead, this

Bug#404036: gzip does not install

Package: gzip Version: 1.3.9-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Unpacking replacement gzip ... Setting up gzip (1.3.9-1) ... install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): warning, ignoring confusing INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file. No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'.

Bug#401530: confirm that 401530 is fixed

Hi, I have tested the package on ppc and can confirm that 401530 is indeed fixed, thanks! regards, Holger pgpHjBXzvDDp4.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#403728: marked as done (Needs Replaces: openoffice.org-common (<< 2.1~rc2-1))

Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:21:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in 2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r

Bug#399329: 3 security issues: PMASA-2006-7, PMASA-2006-8, PMASA-2006-9

On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 00:02 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > The solution is that the behaviour is changed and an extra configuration > > parameter has been added. Is this suitable for sarge? See also patch. > > What functionality is referred to by "Bad IP Allow/Deny checking"? It is a > black

Processed: Don't forget that graphicsmagick suffers from libpng problem as well.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 401047 -1 Bug#401047: imagemagick: [AMD64] FTBFS with recent libpng. Bug 401047 cloned as bug 404043. > reassign -1 graphicsmagick Bug#404043: imagemagick: [AMD64] FTBFS with recent libpng. Bug reassigned from package `imagemagick' to `graphicsma

Processed: Re: Bug#403611: xemacs21-basesupport: xsl mode interprets delete key inconsistently

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 403611 etch-ignore Bug#403611: xemacs21-basesupport: xsl mode interprets delete key inconsistently There were no tags set. Tags added: etch-ignore > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking s

Bug#354355: sympa Soap configuration and other things

"Stefan Hornburg (Racke)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait (wrote) : > I don't necessarily need a patch on the soap configuration, just a pointer > to the places where I find it in Jean latest package. debian/template : Template: wwsympa/fastcgi Type: boolean Default: false _Description: Do you want

Bug#404046: gnome-peercast: Badly ships a static library file in a non-devel package

Package: gnome-peercast Severity: serious Justification: Policy 8.4 gnome-peercast ships a static library file libpeercast.a. This is bad for the following reasons: * It conflicts with libpeercast0-dev and hence trigered bug #404000 * No package should be built against gnome-peercast unless it s

Bug#403998: No such package version

severity 403998 wishlist retitle 403998 "Please package newer version" thanks Hello, >From: Jonny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: It is not installable >Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:53:09 +0900 >Package: gzip >Version: 1.3.9-1 >Severity: grave I do not see version 1.3.9-1 of g

Bug#404013: marked as done (file conflict between zope2.9 and zope2.9-sandbox)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:32:09 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#404013: fixed in zope2.9 2.9.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed: Merge and reassign bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 404000 gnome-peercast Bug#404000: file conflict between libpeercast0-dev and gnome-peercast Bug reassigned from package `peercast' to `gnome-peercast'. > retitle 404000 gnome-peercast: Badly ships a static library file in a > non-devel packag

Processed: No such package version

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 403998 wishlist Bug#403998: It is not installable Severity set to `wishlist' from `grave' > retitle 403998 "Please package newer version" Bug#403998: It is not installable Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#404020: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils

reassign 404020 libuser thanks Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: id-utils > Version: 3.2d-11 > Severity: serious > Justfication: file conflicts between packages > > hi, > > both id-utils and libuser ship `/usr/share/man/man1/lid.1.gz' but do > not conflict $ findpkg -b

Processed: Re: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 404020 libuser Bug#404020: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils Bug reassigned from package `id-utils' to `libuser'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: tagging 403932, tagging 403934, tagging 403935, tagging 403938

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > tags 403932 etch-ignore Bug#403932: xgammon: install a file in /usr/X11R6/include/X11/ Tags were: patch pending Tags added: etch-ignore > tags 403934 etch-ignore Bug#403934: xvier: c

Processed: tagging 402259

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 402259 patch Bug#402259: sysv-rc-bootsplash: fails to install or remove There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#402259: sysv-rc-bootsplash: Pablo's patch fails to apply

Package: sysv-rc-bootsplash Version: 1.0.4-1 Followup-For: Bug #402259 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 $ patch --dry-run <../rc-bootsplash.patch patching file rc.sysv-rc Hunk #1 succeeded at 12 with fuzz 2. Hunk #4 FAILED at 85. Hunk #9 succeeded at 337 (offset 1 line). Hunk #10 suc

Bug#403117: Incomplete copyright/license information: Additional restrictions to GPL

On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 07:47:15PM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > currently debian/copyright mentions that the package is licensed under > plain GPL. This is apparently wrong as for example src/cfft.h state > (other files too): > [... GPL boilerplate ...] > ** Software using this code must display

Processed: merging 404020 404021

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > merge 404020 404021 Bug#404020: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils Bug#404021: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils Merged 404020 404021. > End of message, stopping p

Processed: Re: Bug#392357: fixed in pcsc-lite 1.3.2-3

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 392357 Bug#392357: fails to stop; postinst goes into infinite loop 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead. Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping proce

Bug#404049: file conflict between lesstif-doc and libmotif-dev

Package: libmotif-dev Version: 2.2.3-1.5 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both lesstif-doc and libmotif-dev ship `/usr/share/man/man3/Composite.3.gz' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error proc

Processed: reassign 404020 to libuser

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > reassign 404020 libuser Bug#404020: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils Bug#404021: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils Bug reassigned from package `libuser' to `libus

Bug#392357: fixed in pcsc-lite 1.3.2-3

reopen 392357 thanks On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 03:47:15PM -0700, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: >* debian/pcscd.init: really commit a local patch that should already be in > 1.3.2-2. Closes: #392357 "fails to stop; postinst goes into infinite > loop" Sorry, this still does not work (I misse

Bug#404047: gzip: fails to install due to install-info complaining about gzip.info

Package: gzip Version: 1.3.9-1 Severity: grave gzip fails to install and when you try to install other packages with apt-get it first tries to setup gzip and fails. As not every one is install-info expert grave seams to be adequate. # apt-get install gzip Reading package lists... Done Building de

Bug#403955: Try to create logfile razor-agent.log in root

severity 403955 important thanks On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 10:46:26PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > Package: spamassassin > Version: 3.1.7-1 > Severity: serious > The daemon trys to create and use a logfile /razor-agent.log which > should go to /var/log! But presumably it fails to create it, theref

Bug#404052: file conflict between lesstif-doc and libmotif-dev

Package: lesstif-doc Version: 1:0.94.4-2 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both lesstif-doc and libmotif-dev ship `/usr/share/man/man3/Composite.3.gz' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error pro

Processed: "patch"

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 404020 file conflict with id-utils: Must rename lid.1.gz -> lid.8.gz Bug#404020: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking s

Processed: Re: Bug#403955: Try to create logfile razor-agent.log in root

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 403955 important Bug#403955: Try to create logfile razor-agent.log in root Severity set to `important' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admi

Bug#403776: kdm seems to violate FHS

ok I understand : it's coherent, it's just a strange and unpleasant behavior. Now, to test the effect of what you've just changed to the appearance, you have to restart kdm using /etc/init.d (and losing your session), starting a new session from the menu is not enough any more, very discouraging.

Bug#403454: mindi does "rm -Rf /home" !

tags 403454 + pending thanks Hi Matija, Thank you for reporting this bug and for giving the pointers below. Looking at the mailing list thread it looks like the patch listed in both the mailing list thread and in trac ticket 100 is the same and did not work because you wrote in the mailinglist

Bug#404054: file conflict between libasm-dev and libelfsh0-dev

Package: libasm-dev Version: 0.123-2 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both libasm-dev and libelfsh0-dev ship `/usr/lib/libasm.a' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/a

Processed: Re: Bug#403998: No such package version

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 403998 serious Bug#403998: "Please package newer version" Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#404051: libapache2-mod-perl2: Typo in Apache2::SizeLimit causes crash under some conditions

Package: libapache2-mod-perl2 Version: 2.0.2-2.2 Severity: grave Tags: patch, fixed-upstream Justification: causes non-serious data loss There is a typo on line 113 in /usr/lib/perl5/Apache2/SizeLimit.pm, mod_perl 2.0.2, which under some conditions, i.e. Apache2::SizeLimit is used and configured t

Bug#403804: net.agent check for lo= in /etc/network/run/ifstate is broken on unclean shutdown; interface not brought up

On Dec 19, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The whole check for lo being up based on /etc/network/run/ifstate seems > less than ideal; it could instead check whether the actual interface is > up, that seems less likely to have false positivies. Looks like a good idea. I would also be more co

Bug#404055: file conflict between libasm-dev and libelfsh0-dev

Package: libelfsh0-dev Version: 0.65rc1-1 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both libasm-dev and libelfsh0-dev ship `/usr/lib/libasm.a' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cach

Bug#370132: [Pkg-net-snmp-devel] Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults on ia64 upon first query

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, > Package: snmpd > Version: 5.2.2-3 > Severity: important > > snmpd no longer works on ia64. It dies when receiving first query. > Here's a sample testcase, running "snmpwalk" from another box ('dogma'): Could you retest this with 5.2.3-5? One bu

Processed: Re: Bug#403454: mindi does "rm -Rf /home" !

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 403454 + pending Bug#403454: mindi does "rm -Rf /home" ! There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bug

Bug#403426: kernel corrupts LUKS partition header on arm

We're seeing corruption of LUKS partition headers on ARM. I've confirmed this on two different ARM platforms (IXP4xx and IOP32x) and with 2.6.17 and 2.6.18. Basically, when you create a LUKS partition on a PC and then connect it to an ARM box and open it, you get an "automatic header conversion f

Bug#403091: haskell-uulib still FTBFS due to missing Build-Depends-Indep on hugs

Hi, The bug in cpphs is fixed but haskell-uulib still FTBFS because the package is missing a Build-Depends-Indep on hugs. I will upload a fixed version later today. Greetings Arjan signature.asc Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend

Bug#403611: xemacs21-basesupport: xsl mode interprets delete key inconsistently

tags 403611 etch-ignore thanks On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 06:32:20AM +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: > On December 18, 2006 at 2:09PM +0100, > peter_e (at gmx.net) wrote: > > Package: xemacs21-basesupport > > Version: 2006.05.10-1 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: release criterion 5.(e) > >

Bug#404057: axyl: fails to install in clean chroot: find: /etc/apache: No such file or directory

Package: axyl Version: 2.1.11 Severity: serious hi, axyl fails to install if /etc/apache is missing: Setting up axyl (2.1.12) ... mkdir: created directory `/var/lib/axyl' mkdir: created directory `/var/lib/axyl/system' mkdir: created directory `/var/log/axyl' Unix user account axyl successf

Processed: Re: Bug#403998: No such package version

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 403998 "Package is not installable" Bug#403998: "Please package newer version" Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bug

Bug#403998: No such package version

retitle 403998 "Package is not installable" thanks Hello, On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: > severity 403998 serious > thanks > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 04:41:22PM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > > >From: Jonny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: It is no

Processed: unstable, gzip, apt-get dist-upgrade - error

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 404048 grave Bug#404048: unstable, gzip, apt-get dist-upgrade - error Severity set to `grave' from `normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#404048: unstable, gzip, apt-get dist-upgrade - error

severity 404048 grave thanks Hi, this bug is actually grave because gzip is uninstallable in sid now. Andreas pgp5ZHBuzZSwS.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#396636: Fix for using eclipse with xulrunner

Hi, so I decided to fetch eclipse from the debian-svn and build it locally as I thought I saw a xulrunner.dpatch. It turned out that patch just changed the dependecy, but there is the firefox and firefox2 patches which include a fix to use the new API from xulrunner. I just copied over parts of t

Bug#404055: file conflict between libasm-dev and libelfsh0-dev

severity 404055 important thanks Hi, I've added a conflict in libasm-dev, so this atleast isn't RC anymore. It seems you only have libasm.a on a few arches? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#370132: [Pkg-net-snmp-devel] Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults on ia64 upon first query

On 12/21/06, Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, > Package: snmpd > Version: 5.2.2-3 > Severity: important > > snmpd no longer works on ia64. It dies when receiving first query. > Here's a sample testcase, running "snmpwalk" from another

Processed: file conflict between libasm-dev and libelfsh0-dev

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 404055 important Bug#404055: file conflict between libasm-dev and libelfsh0-dev Severity set to `important' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#402951: libapache-mod-ssl: restart leaves /var/cache/apache/__db.ssl_cache.db there

Hi Mark, On St, 2006-12-13 at 10:08 -0800, Mark Symonds wrote: > Possible DoS attack in the wild? I wouldn't think so but it's been the same > thing on four different servers in a week... I'm going to post to some lug > mailing lists later today to see if anyone else is seeing this. Did you

Bug#404054: marked as done (file conflict between libasm-dev and libelfsh0-dev)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#404054: fixed in elfutils 0.123-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#403804: net.agent check for lo= in /etc/network/run/ifstate is broken on unclean shutdown; interface not brought up

Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 19, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The whole check for lo being up based on /etc/network/run/ifstate seems > > less than ideal; it could instead check whether the actual interface is > > up, that seems less likely to have false positivies. > Looks like a go

Bug#403091: marked as done (haskell-uulib: FTBFS: dist/build/tmp/src/UU/Parsing/Offside.hs:"dist/build/tmp/src/UU/Parsing/Offside.hs": 163:21: Parse error)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:17:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#403091: fixed in haskell-uulib 0.9.2-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: downgrade of severity

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > #as discussed in the IRC channel. > retitle 403776 kdm: Theme option doesn't work Bug#403776: kdm seems to violate FHS Changed Bug title. > severity 403776 normal Bug#403776: kdm: Theme option doesn't work Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > tha

Bug#403952: marked as done (rlwrap: empty package on several architectures [sudo and $(PWD)])

Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#403952: fixed in rlwrap 0.28-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#402482: RC?

On Thursday 21 December 2006 02:46, Steve Langasek wrote: > You could argue that the package is "unfit for release" (=> sev: > serious), but then I don't see how that's consistent with asking for an > etch-ignore tag. If it's ignorable for etch, I don't see why it > wouldn't also be ignorable for

Processed: Patch for RC gzip bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 404048 patch Bug#404048: unstable, gzip, apt-get dist-upgrade - error There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#403952: marked as done (rlwrap: empty package on several architectures [sudo and $(PWD)])

Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:02:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#403952: fixed in rlwrap 0.24-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#404046: gnome-peercast: Badly ships a static library file in a non-devel package

Re: Romain Beauxis 2006-12-21 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > gnome-peercast ships a static library file libpeercast.a. > > This is bad for the following reasons: > * It conflicts with libpeercast0-dev and hence trigered bug #404000 > * No package should be built against gnome-peercast unless it states in >

Bug#404048: Patch for RC gzip bug

tags 404048 patch thanks Hi, here's a simple patch that fixes this problem: diff -Nur gzip-1.3.9.old/doc/gzip.texi gzip-1.3.9/doc/gzip.texi --- gzip-1.3.9.old/doc/gzip.texi2006-12-08 19:45:37.0 +0100 +++ gzip-1.3.9/doc/gzip.texi2006-12-21 15:04:50.0 +0100 @@ -28,14 +2

Bug#370132: [Pkg-net-snmp-devel] Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults on ia64 upon first query

Jochen Friedrich a écrit : > tags 370132 + help moreinfo > thanks > > Hi Aurelien, > >>> snmpd no longer works on ia64. It dies when receiving first query. > >> I have got the same exact problem on s390. Given that this bug renders > > I tested this in a chroot on merulo and raptor by running s

Bug#404047: marked as done (gzip: fails to install due to install-info complaining about gzip.info)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:01:43 -0700 (MST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in 1.3.9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#403998: marked as done ("Package is not installable")

Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:01:43 -0700 (MST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in 1.3.9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#404036: marked as done (gzip does not install)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:01:43 -0700 (MST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in 1.3.9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#403935: Patch is slightly wrong

Gunnar seems to have been a little sleepy yesterday. For his patch to work you also need to manually create debian/compat with the single line: --snip-- 4 --snap-- -- Rodrigo Gallardo GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28 signature.asc Description: Digital signatu

Bug#370132: [Pkg-net-snmp-devel] Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults on ia64 upon first query

Aurelien Jarno a écrit : > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x77c20e60 in getmntent_r () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > (gdb) > (gdb) bt > #0 0x77c20e60 in getmntent_r () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > #1 0x77c20738 in getmntent () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > #2 0x77e9f196 in init_disk

Processed: severity of 400627 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > severity 400627 serious Bug#400627: apache2 refuse to start when kolab-webadmin is installed Severity set to `serious' from `important' > End of message, stopping processing here. P

Bug#370132: [Pkg-net-snmp-devel] Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults on ia64 upon first query

Hi Aurelien, > using the libc6-dbg package, I have seen that the getmntent() function > is called with a NULL pointer. This may be due to the fact that on s390 > there is in the build log: > checking for mount table location... unknown > > whereas on architecture there is: > checking for moun

Bug#404048: marked as done (unstable, gzip, apt-get dist-upgrade - error)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#404048: fixed in gzip 1.3.9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#370132: [Pkg-net-snmp-devel] Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults on ia64 upon first query

Jochen Friedrich a écrit : > Hi Aurelien, > >> using the libc6-dbg package, I have seen that the getmntent() function >> is called with a NULL pointer. This may be due to the fact that on s390 >> there is in the build log: >> checking for mount table location... unknown >> >> whereas on architec

Bug#386487: FTBFS: aclocal: macro `AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' required but not defined

Hi, A question. Isn't it possible to solve this issue by a m4_ifdef( [AM_PROG_MKDIR_P], [AM_PROG_MKDIR_P],// automake >= 1.8 [...old solution...] // automake <= 1.7 ) Maybe you could forward this to upstream. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Bug#401416: pending upload of digikam-0.8.2

"Mark Purcell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Given the discussion has died down. > > I am proposing to release digikam[imageplugins] 0.8.2 to unstable in the > next couple of days to overcome the lack of an libexiv2 transition. From what I can see, this is fine. bugs.d.o doesn't report anything un

Bug#402179: [Bug-tar] Race condition in GNU tar test-suite

Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 15:46 +, Alex Owen wrote: >> This patch should fix the problem. I guess the opotions are to aply >> this patch to 1.16 or package 1.16.1. I guess applying the patch is >> the better option if we wnat to fix this for etch. > It's n

Bug#379628: marked as done (ntfsresize: resizing a Vista NTFS partition leads to corrupted partition)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#379628: fixed in linux-ntfs 1.13.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#404104: unnecessary depends on ca-certificates

Package: libcurl3-gnutls Version: 7.15.5-1 Severity: critical Tags: security Given that trustworthiness of certificate authorities is not evaluated, no package should depend on ca-certificates. To do so forces the user to trust everything in ca-certificates. I suggest setting this Depends to

Bug#404105: CVE-2006-6628: Integer overflow in OpenOffice.org

Package: openoffice.org Version: 2.0.4.dfsg.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole openoffice.org crashes when loading the exploit from [1]. There is inconclusive information whether this may be used to execute arbitrary code [2,3]. If this is a mere DoS you may of c

Bug#404103: unnecessary depends on ca-certificates

Package: libcurl3 Version: 7.15.5-1 Severity: critical Tags: security Given that trustworthiness of certificate authorities is not evaluated, no package should depend on ca-certificates. To do so forces the user to trust everything in ca-certificates. I suggest setting this Depends to Recomm

Bug#402179: [Bug-tar] Race condition in GNU tar test-suite

On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:32:30AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote: > On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 15:46 +, Alex Owen wrote: > > > This patch should fix the problem. I guess the opotions are to aply > > this patch to 1.16 or package 1.16.1. I guess applying the patch is > > the better option if we wnat to

  1   2   >