On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 14:20 +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> > relocate_inodes() -> relocate_inode() -> at the end of the function
> > calls write_mft_record() which uses the ntfs_volume and the
Package: xephem
Version: 3.5.2-1
Severity: grave
The last version of x11-common in sid (1:7.1.0-7) includes an
explicit conflict for xephem (with no version), so this extremely
useful astronomy package becomes uninstallable. A relatively
quick would be appreciated (recompilation?).
Regards,
--
Ál
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396045: fixed in libpam-openafs-session 1.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Hi,
It's my NMU that is involved, but I'm curious - why is this:
a) causing the build to halt
b) happening at all?
The error, if one actually exists, is not in the section you quoted,
but higher up:
...
tar: rivet-0.5.0/debian/control:
time stamp 2006-11-28 10:20:04 is 1088 s in the future
tar:
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397316: fixed in libpam-openafs-session 1.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396045: fixed in libpam-openafs-session 1.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393636: fixed in gnat-gps 4.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> found 399016 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1
Bug#399016: kaddressbook: Data loss, involving strange file duplication and
locking problems
Bug marked as found in version 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1.
>
End of
Package: trac
Version: 0.10.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FHS
According to /usr/share/python-support/trac/trac/siteconfig.py, trac looks
for its global trac.ini file under /usr/share/trac/conf.
How about /etc/trac instead?
See http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracIni for more
-- System Info
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> notforwarded 355261
Bug#355261: gnome-applets: drivemount_applet2 : should wait until unmounting
finished
Removed annotation that Bug had been forwarded to
http://bugzilla.gnome.org
Package: gnome-nettool
Version: 2.16.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source, probably because of a missing
build-dependency.
| Automatic build of gnome-nettool_2.16.0-1 on odin by sbuild/sparc 79
| Build started at 20061128-2202
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 06:23:03PM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote:
> Package: gaim-otr
> Followup-For: Bug #394299
>
> There needs to be another change in order to fix the following error:
> gtk-dialog.c:33:22: error: gtkstock.h: No such file or directory
>
> This need to be changed on line 33.
> -#incl
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:02:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393397: fixed in maradns 1.2.12.04-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Hi,
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 November 2006 13:08, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> > There are two NTFS during resizing. The original and the resized. When
> > the resizing is over then the latter is consistent and the old one is
> > irrelevant. ntfsresize doesn't work lik
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> tags 399790 pending
Bug#399790: amanda-common: puring fails with deluser
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
retitle 399790 deluser fails in purge [+NMU diff]
thanks
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Package: amanda-common
> Version: 1:2.5.1p1-2
> Severity: serious
>
> postrm fails when deluser fails:
>
> | /usr/sbin/deluser: The user `backup' is not a member of group `disk'.
> | dpkg: err
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 399790 deluser fails in purge [+NMU diff]
Bug#399790: amanda-common: puring fails with deluser
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 400753 important
Bug#400753: squashfs: FTBFS
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
Package: zope-psycopgda2
Version: 2.0.5.1-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Installing or uninstalling the current version of zope-psycopgda2 is not
possible
due to the lack of a Python-Version field.
Selecting previously deselected package zope-psycopgda2.
(Reading dat
Here's a fix on the postinst and prerm scripts to make zope-psycopgda2
installable again:
--- zope-psycopgda2.postinst.orig 2006-11-29 10:52:12.0 +0800
+++ zope-psycopgda2.postinst2006-11-29 10:51:14.0 +0800
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
fi
# End automatically added section
# Auto
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Sounds like I'll wanna grab the current source, but it also sounds
> > like the changes you made and the changes I made are quite similar.
>
> Yes, and I just uploaded 4.0.1 which, according to its change log,
> fixes a few bugs,
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 20:07:00 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400817: xephem conflicts with x11-common in sid, becomes
uninstallable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 400358 normal
Bug#400358: netdiag: Segfaults and leaves port in promiscuous mode
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> merge 400358 7794 12306
Bug#7794: netdiag: Program(s) leave port in promiscuous mode
Bug#12306: netdiag: Failure to turn o
I have gotten no relevant response from GTRC. Accordingly, I think this bug
really is "serious". Perhaps someone else could try asking them the Three
Questions.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Aurélien GÉRÔME ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061128 21:31]:
> tags 46 pending
> thanks
>
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 02:52:46PM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 02:12:28PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > * Aurélien GÉRÔME ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061104 15:26]:
> > > > I found a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 400066 patch
Bug#400066: lcdproc_0.5.1-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: impossible constraint in asm
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
101 - 126 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
