Hi
Thanks for the report. Yes 2.6.17 is not supported, because 2.6.18 is
the version that will be shipped in etch.
I'll contact upstream about this issue. The kernel team have moved
to 2.6.18.3 according to the changelog in
http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6/news/20061123T193153Z.html
Ki
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061127 22:22]:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 07:40:20PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > After more checking, the bug is somewhere else. The library dynamically
> > opens (in src/m17n-gui.c):
>
> > MSTRUCT_CALLOC (interface, MERROR_WIN);
> > interface->library
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 284770 - pending
Bug#284770: dbmail: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
Tags were: fixed-upstream pending patch
Bug#376381: dbmail: FTBFS: invalid lvalue in assi
* Roger Leigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061128 00:48]:
> liblockdev1 and liblockdev1-dbg are uninstallable due to both containing
> /usr/share/doc/liblockdev1/NEWS.Debian.gz.
>
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/liblockdev1_1.0.3-1.1_powerpc.deb(--unpack): trying
> to overwrite `/usr/
package: links2
severity: grave
tags: security
See bugs #399187 and #399188 for discussion. Patches in links and elinks
converge towards removal of smb support. Attached patch is for sarge.
-Mikko
diff -u links2-2.1pre16/config.sub links2-2.1pre16/config.sub
--- links2-2.1pre16/config.sub
+++ li
* Jon Daley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061128 06:34]:
> What needs to happen to get this package out of unstable into testing?
It needs to built on all architectures.
> I see this page, but I am not sure what it is saying - The builds are failing
> for ia64, mips and s390?
"There are no builds" - for
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 303991 - pending
Bug#303991: dbmail-mysql: Does not do escaping in mysql version - both a
worrying flaw and stops adduser working
Tags were: pending fixed-upstream security
Tags
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 08:12 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 03:45:36PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >For now you can just
> > blacklist all platform events like Marco already suggested.
>
> Nope. modprobe don't have the knowledge tha
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package to fix the uninstallability of the
dbg-package under the "you have to fix the pieces"-NMU-policy (repairing
my own NMU).
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -ur ../lockdev-1.0.3~~/debian/changelog ../lockdev-1.0.3/debian/changelog
--- ../loc
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 01:04:02AM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> This is where it crashes for me, first time it hits
>
> src/CaptureThread.cpp line 616:
> m_capture_thread->m_values.push_front(cvalue/m_channel_count);
>
Hi,
This is strange because nobody meets exactly the same th
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#398642: fixed in links2 2.1pre25-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400676: fixed in lockdev 1.0.3-1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 290833 - pending
Bug#290833: dbmail-pgsql: Inconsistent escaping of user supplied data in
dbauthpgsql.c
Tags were: pending fixed-upstream security
Tags removed: pending
> tags
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 02:56 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 27 November 2006 23:45, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > //vol = ntfs_mount(opt.volume, 0);
> > vol = NULL;
>
> I'm almost afraid to have to tell you this... ;-)
>
> After recompiling ntfsfix with this change, running it
Vasiliy,
please help Ola. 2.6.18-ovz028test006 has been released today
and includes 2.6.18.3 patches.
Thanks,
Kirill
> Hi
>
> Thanks for the report. Yes 2.6.17 is not supported, because 2.6.18 is
> the version that will be shipped in etch.
>
> I'll contact upstream about this issue. The kernel
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition for
etch.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
Nur in ../nsis-2.19: build64.diff?bug=383336;msg=15;att=1.
diff -ur ../nsis-2.19~/debian/changelog ../nsis-2.19/debian/changel
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 398637 important
Bug#398637: zoph: postinst fails
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 396630 needs rebuild and ABI bump for 2.6.18-2
Bug#396630: squashfs broken on amd64
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 10:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383336: fixed in nsis 2.19-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 10:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#398421: fixed in nsis 2.19-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
retitle 396630 needs rebuild and ABI bump for 2.6.18-2
thanks
Hi waldi,
it is now nearly a month ago when I submitted this bug. In the meantime,
I pinged you at least three times about it, where you've choosen to
answer others but not to me.
This is not like I wanted to have it work out. Giving
severity 398637 important
thanks
* Lucas Nussbaum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061114 09:22]:
> I couldn't reproduce it in a chroot, but it is reproducible with
> piuparts... It needs more investigation.
I downgrade it because I don't think this should really block this
package from being delivered with
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 10:14 +, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 02:56 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Monday 27 November 2006 23:45, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > > //vol = ntfs_mount(opt.volume, 0);
> > > vol = NULL;
> >
> > I'm almost afraid to have to tell yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 387089 openssl
Bug#387089: Certificate links must not be removed
Bug reassigned from package `ca-certificates' to `openssl'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 398373 grave
Bug#398373: gnome-applets drivemount: incorrectly claims that USB drive is
unmounted during the cache flush
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 399070 1.3.0-13
Bug#399070: proftpd: ProFTPD Unspecified Vulnerability (CVE-2006-5815)
Bug marked as found in version 1.3.0-13.
> found 399070 1.2.10-15sarge2
Bug#399070: proftpd: ProFTPD Unspecified Vulnerability (CVE-2006-5815)
Bug marked as fo
found 399070 1.3.0-13
found 399070 1.2.10-15sarge2
retitle 399070 CVE-2006-5815: remote code execution in ProFTPD
thanks
The previous fix fixed the wrong issue. See
http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2858
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
severity 398760 important
tags 398760 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
other people and I cannot reproduce this bug with the current version of
aptitude, therefore I'm lowering severity now. Can you please check your
environment if it is correct?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth
Le mardi 28 novembre 2006 à 12:38 +0100, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> * Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061128 12:36]:
> > Le mardi 28 novembre 2006 à 12:30 +0100, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > > > FWIW, fixing this bug requires changes in the kernel.
> > >
> > > Why that? AFAICR, umount must not
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> Ok, I just committed some more fixes to ntfsresize. It never actually
> unmounted the volume, just exited which was very rude of it!
It's intentionally not umounted. Ntfsresize __rewrites__ NTFS and it's
dangerous to umount because that could int
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #kdebase
> close 194248 4:3.3.2-1
Bug#194248: kde startup finishes at frozen root window
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 4:3.3.2-1, send any further explanations to Paul
Anthony Ju
Hi Szaka,
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 12:46 +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
>
> > Ok, I just committed some more fixes to ntfsresize. It never actually
> > unmounted the volume, just exited which was very rude of it!
>
> It's intentionally not umount
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > It's intentionally not umounted. Ntfsresize __rewrites__ NTFS and it's
> > dangerous to umount because that could interfer, corrupt or destroy the
> > resized, consistent NTFS.
>
> Do you not keep the "ntfs_volume" of the mount consistent with y
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:49:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Compiles without any issue
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:49:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Compiles without any issue
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:49:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Compiles without any issue
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061128 12:36]:
> Le mardi 28 novembre 2006 à 12:30 +0100, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > > FWIW, fixing this bug requires changes in the kernel.
> >
> > Why that? AFAICR, umount must not return before not everything is
> > written down.
>
> I don't think this
Le mardi 28 novembre 2006 à 12:30 +0100, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > FWIW, fixing this bug requires changes in the kernel.
>
> Why that? AFAICR, umount must not return before not everything is
> written down.
I don't think this is always the case.
Of course, if the applet is saying things are OK
FWIW, I also experienced this when unmounting a USB stick using nautilus.
Because I pulled out the USB stick too quickly, I ended up with a corrupted
filesystem. :-/
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | GnuPG key: 888354F7
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | 08A9 7B7D 3
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:49:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Compiles without any issue
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
"Mattia Dongili" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> kernel bug? cpufreqd correctly complains about not being able to switch to
> ondemand. If this governor doesn't work for your platform, just
> reconfigure cpufreqd to avoid using it.
Now I read more carefully.
My platform is a last generatio
"Mattia Dongili" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Nov 27 12:19:35 janni kernel: ondemand governor failed to load due to too
>> long transition latency
>> Nov 27 12:19:37 janni cpufreqd: cpufreqd_set_profile : Couldn't set
>> profile "On Demand High" set for cpu0
>> Nov 27 12:19:37 janni cpufreqd
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:08 +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
>
> > > It's intentionally not umounted. Ntfsresize __rewrites__ NTFS and it's
> > > dangerous to umount because that could interfer, corrupt or destroy the
> > > resized, consistent NTFS
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#399070: fixed in proftpd-dfsg 1.3.0-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:08 +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> >
> > There are two NTFS during resizing. The original and the resized. When
> > the resizing is over then the latter is consistent and the old one is
> > irrelevant. ntfsresize doesn
Anton Altaparmakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Argh! Thank you for persisting with this. I have now looked at the
> code and you are right it does not do the same thing. This is
> because when Yura ported my $LogFile code from the kernel for some
> unknown to me (or forgotten by me) reason he
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 09:54:08AM +0100, Ludovic RESLINGER wrote:
> This is strange because nobody meets exactly the same things in backtrace,
I have noticed, but I get the same backtrace every time on my amd64.
(Only one time I had different behaviour, but I don't know if that was
because I did
Package: apt-listchanges
Version: 2.71
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
After last apt-listchanges upgrade, and doing after that
an upgrade from experimental I got the following Traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/apt-listchanges", lin
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 14:20 +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:08 +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> > >
> > > There are two NTFS during resizing. The original and the resized. When
> > > the resizing is over then the l
On November 27, 2006 at 10:55PM +0100,
maxx (at debian.org) wrote:
> > > On November 23, 2006 at 10:38PM +0100,
> > > maxx (at debian.org) wrote:
> > >
> > > > Package: mgp
> > > > Version: 1.11b-7
> > > > Severity: grave
> > > > Justification: renders package unusable
> > > >
> > > > $ mgp sample
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 12:45 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> A first look at the code shows the callback called when umount has
> completed is only used for displaying errors, not successful operations.
> There's definitely something wrong here.
I could be wrong, but isn't this similar to bug 3969
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 09:54:08AM +0100, Ludovic RESLINGER wrote:
> Could you try to test with actual debian binary and without alsa for
> exemble?
Recompiling fmit with --disable-alsa seems to make it work reliably on
my Debian Testing PowerPC. Will try it on my Unstable AMD64 when I get
home...
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my mp3check NMU.
I have tested that Tobias' patch works fine, and i can not reproduce the
problem of the bug #227977.
diff -Nrua mp3check-0.8.0.orig/debian/changelog mp3check-0.8.0/debian/changelog
--- mp3check-0.8.0.orig/debian/changelog2006-11-28 15:38:57
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 13:08, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> There are two NTFS during resizing. The original and the resized. When
> the resizing is over then the latter is consistent and the old one is
> irrelevant. ntfsresize doesn't work like the other utilities: mount,
> modify, umount. It
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 400400 + pending
Bug#400400: dh-make-perl: Generated Build-Depends-Indep field makes no sense
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#399047: fixed in mp3check 0.8.0-4.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Tue, November 28, 2006 1:44 pm, leandro noferini said:
> "Mattia Dongili" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> kernel bug? cpufreqd correctly complains about not being able to switch
>> to
>> ondemand. If this governor doesn't work for your platform, just
>> reconfigure cpufreqd to avoid u
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:02:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400744: fixed in apt-listchanges 2.72
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: squashfs
Severity: serious
Version: 1:3.1r2-4
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
squashfs seems to use bashisms in its debian/rules, please don't do
this (or use SHELL=/bin/bash in there):
DEB_MAKE_CHECK_TARGET unset, not running checks
DEB_MAKE_INSTALL_TARGET unset, skipping default makefile.mk
tag 400400 + pending
thanks
...Fixed in SVN. I'll tackle a few more bugs and will upload as soon
as possible.
Thanks!
--
Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF
--
To UNS
Hi,
Actually, my AMD64 works with sarge, so I tested fmit with
a new chroot environement with a debian unstable installed
tomorrow, so with latest versions of packages.
I didn't meet this bug, I cannot reproduce it, fmit
run well in my case. It is why I ask to you to test in
the same conditions.
Y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package zope-cmfforum
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: zope-cmfforum
> tags 399957 + confirmed
Bug#399957: zope-cmfforum: Breaks "my folder" and probably other things
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Plea
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 02:33:43AM +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> Package: zope-cmfforum
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> [...]
> Either way, please don't release this in Etch. It seems to be really
> old-hat and things have moved on.
I would suggest to ask ftpmasters
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 14:20 +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> >
> > relocate_inodes(), relocate_inode(), especially the $MFT part. There is a
> > strict order in what and when is relocated. At some point ntfs_volume is
> > mostly used only for re
Package: gnupg2
Version: 2.0.0-5
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
A vulnerability has been reported in GnuPG 2. See
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2006q4/000241.html
for details.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:32:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355656: fixed in rivet 0.5.0-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400694: fixed in preseed 1.22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#399205: fixed in libsmbios 0.12.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: proftpd
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Another vulnerability has been reported in ProFTPd's mod_tls.
See
http://secunia.com/advisories/23141/
for details.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:47:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#398585: fixed in php-imagick 0.9.11+1-4.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: rivet
Version: 0.5.0-3.1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of rivet_0.5.0-3.1 on peri by sbuild/hppa 98
> Build started at 20061128-1001
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends
Package: php-imagick
Version: 0.9.11+1-4.1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of php-imagick_0.9.11+1-4.1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20061128-1850
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition for
etch.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -ur php-imagick-0.9.11+1~/debian/changelog
php-imagick-0.9.11+1/debian/changelog
--- php-imagick-0.9.11+1~/debian/change
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> tags 161367 pending
Bug#161367: setpag causes problems with ssh-krb5
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> tags 396045 pending
Bug#396045: libpam-openafs-session: must not rely on -
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:32:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325206: fixed in rivet 0.5.0-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Tue, November 28, 2006 6:20 pm, leandro noferini said:
> "Mattia Dongili" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Now I read more carefully.
>>>
>>> My platform is a last generation iBook G4 and cpufreqd worked fine
>>> also
>>> with the kernel 2.6.17 home compiled. cpufreqd stops workin
Package: lphdisk
Version: 0.9.1-2
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
Justification: causes serious data loss / breaks whole system
The latest few versions of lphdisk completely and utterly break the system. If
run, lphdisk destroys the entire MBR and parition table.
I've tracked this down at least
"Mattia Dongili" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> Now I read more carefully.
>>
>> My platform is a last generation iBook G4 and cpufreqd worked fine also
>> with the kernel 2.6.17 home compiled. cpufreqd stops working from an
>> upgrade on.
>
> ok, and your logs say that _the_kernel_ i
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:32:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394588: fixed in rivet 0.5.0-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395986: fixed in lcdproc 0.5.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Attached is a patch that fixes pretty much all of the errors with 4.x
versions of gcc... there's quite a lot of them. The patch is against the
unpacked oskit in the build-tree/. Most of the patches are simple
fixes, but there's a few things of note:
1) freebsd/3.x/src/lib/libc/stdio/vfprintf.
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400653: fixed in gabber 0.8.8-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
"Mattia Dongili" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> the kernel. could you please lower the severity and reassign?
Ok!
How could I do that?
--
Ciao
leandro
Un esteso e "normale" uso della crittografia è il sistema più forte
per rivendicare il diritto alla privacy nelle comunicazioni
telemati
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400400: fixed in dh-make-perl 0.25
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 359452 pending
Bug#359452: libpam-openafs-session: please finish /usr/doc transition
Tags were: pending fixed
Tags added: pending
> tags 161367 pending
Bug#161367: setpag causes problems with ssh-krb5
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: pending
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 03:33:16AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > reassign 387089 openssl
> Bug#387089: Certificate links must not be removed
> Bug reassigned from package `ca-certificates' to `openssl'.
>From the c_rehash manpage:
Hi,
I wasn't able to reproduce the problem in the upstream bug report with
IMAP folders. I opened the offending emails with mutt and sent them to
my IMAP account. I could see all of the messages in 1.5.0.8.
I can verify that I could only see one of the messages if the folder was
local, as per ups
tags 46 pending
thanks
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 02:52:46PM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 02:12:28PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Aurélien GÉRÔME ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061104 15:26]:
> > > I found a workaround. I will make ircd-hybrid use poll on Linux/Alpha
> > > a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 400753 + pending
Bug#400753: squashfs: FTBFS
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 20:32:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400753: fixed in squashfs 1:3.1r2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi,
Please note that the patch as it is has a very awkward side effect: Every
time you run ntfsresize and either you answer "no" to the "really proceed"
question or ntfsresize aborts without doing anything because it hits a
"this is not supported" case or you try to resize to a too small size o
Package: tdb
Version: 1.0.6-13
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of tdb_1.0.6-13 on nasya by sbuild/sparc 0.50
> Build started at 2006112
tags 400753 + pending
thanks
Hello,
Thanks for the report. It will be uploaded tonight or tomorrow.
Regards,
Arnaud Fontaine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> I could be wrong, but isn't this similar to bug 396939?
It's quite similar.
> A similar Ubuntu patch exists for the drivemount applet, maybe it can be
> added (with translations) too?
If you want to work on it, please go ahead. It will be dropped
Hello Frans,
hello Andree,
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 November 2006 13:08, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
>> There are two NTFS during resizing. The original and the resized. When
>> the resizing is over then the latter is consistent and the old one is
>> irrelevant. ntfsresize doesn't work like
I found some interesting links about this topic:
http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/vga256/drivers/nv/Attic/README.RIVATNT.diff?r1=1.1.2.2&r2=1.1.2.3&hideattic=0&only_with_tag=xf-3_3_3
and
http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/vga256/drivers/n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 396045 pending
Bug#396045: libpam-openafs-session: must not rely on -setpag
Tags were: pending
Bug#397316: '-setpag' with latest openafs 1.4.2 and kernel 2.6.17 doesn't work
anymore
Tags added: pending
> tags 397316 pending
Bug#397316: '-setpag'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 161367 pending
Bug#161367: setpag causes problems with ssh-krb5
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: pending
> tags 396045 pending
Bug#396045: libpam-openafs-session: must not rely on -setpag
Tags were: pending
Bug#397316: '-setpag' with latest op
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> retitle 400785 rivet: tar timing errors
Bug#400785: rivet_0.5.0-3.1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: broken source package
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pleas
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397316: fixed in libpam-openafs-session 1.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
