Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 400179 sid
Bug#400179: gnomesword: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build dependency libsword-dev (<<
1.5.8.90-1)
Tags were: pending
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing h
Package: fvwm
Version: 2.5.12-5
Severity: grave
Tags: stable, security
Hi,
the CRLF injection in fvwm-menu-directory (CVE-2006-5969) as
documented at
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-5969
http://www.gentoo-portage.com/x11-wm/fvwm/ChangeLog
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp
reassign 400174 libextractor-dev
found 400174 0.5.16-1
thanks
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 11:13:19AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in etch, I discovered that your package
> failed to build on amd64.
> Relevant parts:
> creating libextractor_java.la
> /bin/sed: can't
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 400174 libextractor-dev
Bug#400174: libextractor-java: FTBFS on AMD64: /bin/sed: can't read
/usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.la: No such file or directory
Bug reassigned from package `libextractor-java' to `libextractor-dev'.
> found 400174 0.5.16-1
B
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 03:43:13PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 24.11.2006, 14:49 +0100 schrieb Bill Allombert:
> > Package: octave2.1-forge
> > Version: 2006.03.17+dfsg1-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Jusitification: FHS violation
> > Hello Debian Octave Group,
> > The ia64 package
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my ttcn3parser 20060801-1.1 NMU.
diff -Nrua debian.orig/changelog debian/changelog
--- debian.orig/changelog 2006-08-01 21:36:59.0 +
+++ debian/changelog2006-11-25 04:00:04.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+ttcn3parser (20060801-1.1) unstable; urg
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 04:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400252: fixed in libgeda 20061020-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 09:25:42PM +0100, Joop Stakenborg wrote:
> Very weird. All architectures build fine, so why does amd64 fail?
> libcw.so.0.0.0 seems to be created correctly.
Not in the log file that he cited, it doesn't.
make[3]: Entering directory /build/buildd/unixcw-2.3/src/cwlib'
if [
severity 399949 normal
tags 399949 unreproducible
thanks
* Wilfried Goesgens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: iceweasel
> Version: 2.0+dfsg-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> NoScript limits Javascript enabledness to a whitelist.
> After the update no clicking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 399949 normal
Bug#399949: iceweasel: NoScript plugin will make bookmarks disfunctional.
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> tags 399949 unreproducible
Bug#399949: iceweasel: NoScript plugin will make bookmarks disfunctional.
There were no
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 05:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#398833: fixed in ttcn3parser 20060801-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: libgeda20
Version: 20060906-2
Severity: serious
Hi Hamish,
So looking at libgeda for bug #400252 brings another RC bug to my attention:
you have not been changing your library package name in keeping with the
soname changes of this library, and the shlibs provided by libgeda reference
th
reassign 399455 libgeda
unblock 399455 by 400252
forcemerge 400252 399455
thanks
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 07:37:16PM +0100, Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
> This is actually a bug in libgeda; It seems libgeda is not build with
> libgdgeda, but with libgd instead.
Then this shouldn't be listed as a b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 399455 libgeda
Bug#399455: FTBFS: fails to link, missing Build-Depends?
Bug reassigned from package `geda-gattrib' to `libgeda'.
> unblock 399455 by 400252
Bug#399455: FTBFS: fails to link, missing Build-Depends?
Was blocked by: 400252
Blockin
Hi Tobias,
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 05:00:34PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
>
> I have to correct the upstream tag, as this is not in upstream.
> looking at mp3check_0.8.0-4.diff.gz, this is where the bug was introduced.
>
Looking at the package changelog, it seems this change was introduced by
the
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 10:14:53PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> subcommander build-depends on both libsvn-dev and libneon25-dev.
> libsvn-dev itself depends on libneon26-dev.
> libneon26-dev conflicts with libneon25-dev.
> You probably don't need to explicitely depend on libneon25-dev.
The subc
severity 399785 important
tags 399785 unreproducible
thanks
* Wilfried Goesgens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: iceweasel
> Version: 2.0+dfsg-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> I just updated to iceweasel.
> Two points. My menubar is empty. No menus. nada.
> i
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 04:06:02PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 01:41:08PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> (Bug is present up to and including 1:2.1.9-2.)
>> Mailman installs architecture-independent program files not written
>> except at install/upgrade time in /var/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 399785 important
Bug#399785: iceweasel eats all cpu while displaying about:
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tags 399785 unreproducible
Bug#399785: iceweasel eats all cpu while displaying about:
There were no tags set.
Tags added: un
On Saturday 25 November 2006 05:03, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 07:46:41PM +0100, Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
> > Package: libgeda
> > Version: 20061020-1
> > Severity: important
> >
> >
> > This package is supposed to be linked against libgdgeda, however instead
> > it is linke
101 - 120 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
