Your message dated Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:48:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392173: fixed in qt4-x11 4.2.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:48:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392173: fixed in qt4-x11 4.2.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:48:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392797: fixed in qt4-x11 4.2.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:48:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392797: fixed in qt4-x11 4.2.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # ccv/TBL/RFC/rfc1489.txt is indeed non-free.
> tag 393418 confirmed
Bug#393418: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's
Tags were: etch-ignore
Tags added: confirmed
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 391877 normal
Bug#391877: gui-apt-key: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'gettext'
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> tags 391877 pending
Bug#391877: gui-apt-key: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'gettext'
Tags were: pending patch
Tags add
Hey,
How do you propose to solve it?
regards,
marek
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 391736 1.74-2
Bug#391736: lua-mode: fails to install
Bug marked as found in version 1.74-2.
> severity 391736 important
Bug#391736: lua-mode: fails to install
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:02:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393719: fixed in poker-network 1.0.28-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On 10/18/06, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Okay, this means that tetex-base's version will vanish without problems,
and only thailatex's will be there, right?
Right. And when upgrading on sid, dpkg-divert just complains
a little bit that there is no such diversion, before continuing
Package: gr-audio-alsa
Version: 0.5-2
Severity: serious
This source package is part of the GNU Radio suite. As of the upstream
3.0 release, the GNU Radio packaging for Debian has been restructured to
use a single source package 'gnuradio', and I have taken over as primary
maintainer of the suite
Package: gr-audio-jack
Version: 0.3-2
Severity: serious
This source package is part of the GNU Radio suite. As of the upstream
3.0 release, the GNU Radio packaging for Debian has been restructured to
use a single source package 'gnuradio', and I have taken over as primary
maintainer of the suite
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:11:03 +0200
Arjan Oosting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: zinc-compiler
> Version: 1.0.2-6
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> zinc-compiler FTBFS with the n
Package: gnuradio-core
Version: 2.8-6
Severity: serious
This source package is part of the GNU Radio suite. As of the upstream
3.0 release, the GNU Radio packaging for Debian has been restructured to
use a single source package 'gnuradio', and I have taken over as primary
maintainer of the suite
Package: gnuradio-examples
Version: 0.7-2
Severity: serious
This source package is part of the GNU Radio suite. As of the upstream
3.0 release, the GNU Radio packaging for Debian has been restructured to
use a single source package 'gnuradio', and I have taken over as primary
maintainer of the su
Package: gr-audio-oss
Version: 0.9-2
Severity: serious
This source package is part of the GNU Radio suite. As of the upstream
3.0 release, the GNU Radio packaging for Debian has been restructured to
use a single source package 'gnuradio', and I have taken over as primary
maintainer of the suite f
Package: usrp
Version: 0.12-6
Severity: serious
This source package is part of the GNU Radio suite. As of the upstream
3.0 release, the GNU Radio packaging for Debian has been restructured to
use a single source package 'gnuradio', and I have taken over as primary
maintainer of the suite from Ram
Package: gr-usrp
Version: 0.8-3
Severity: serious
This source package is part of the GNU Radio suite. As of the upstream
3.0 release, the GNU Radio packaging for Debian has been restructured to
use a single source package 'gnuradio', and I have taken over as primary
maintainer of the suite from R
Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> Please provide a severity justification.
Did you read the bugreport? The package is unusable.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
Package: gr-wxgui
Version: 0.6-3
Severity: serious
This source package is part of the GNU Radio suite. As of the upstream
3.0 release, the GNU Radio packaging for Debian has been restructured to
use a single source package 'gnuradio', and I have taken over as primary
maintainer of the suite from
# this is not a new problem
found 393846 3.2.3-1
stop
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # this is not a new problem
> found 393846 3.2.3-1
Bug#393846: wave at a webcam to overwrite file
Bug marked as found in version 3.2.3-1.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Hi Arjan,
Am Freitag 13 Oktober 2006 00:35 schrieb Arjan Oosting:
> Op do, 12-10-2006 te 15:53 +0200, schreef Stefan Potyra:
>
> > The problem now is, that it FTBFS on sparc, see [1]. Not quite sure if
> > this is an ubuntu only bug though.
>
> No, it does not look like a ubuntu only bug. It seems
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 393861 !
Bug#393861: this package replaced by gnuradio
Changed Bug submitter from Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Bdale Garbee
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
D
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:28:36PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Package: schoolbell
> Version: 1.2.4-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello,
>
> when building 'schoolbell' in a clean unstable chroot,
> I get the following error:
Hi Andreas,
The error you describe is probably from trying to build sc
reopen 393734
severity 393734 important
thanks
vorlon: should I reopen #393734 ?
lucas: I'm inclined to say yes, but downgraded
ok, will do that
it's bad that sbuild parses the build-deps in such a
way that it picks an uninstallable combination
but it's an arch: all package, so it doesn't rea
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 01:32:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391026: fixed in amanda 1:2.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: mlterm
Version: 2.9.3-3
Severity: serious
When building 'mlterm' on unstable, I get the following error:
make[2]: Entering directory `/mlterm-2.9.3/inputmethod/iiimf'
../../libtool --mode=compile gcc -I../../kiklib/include -I../../mkf/include
-I/usr/X11R6/include -Wall -g -O2 -DUSE_KBD
Package: kiwi
Version: 1.9.9-1
Severity: serious
When building 'kiwi' in a clean unstable chroot,
I get the following error:
cd doc && /usr/bin/make
make[1]: Entering directory `/kiwi-1.9.9/doc'
cd .. && xvfb-run -a tools/epyrun
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "tools/epyrun", line 92, i
Package: syslog-ng
Version: 2.0rc3-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
I've configured syslog-ng to log from the net and to a remote host, and it
worked fine.
Oct 4 06:25:05 beteigeuze syslog-ng[3953]: SIGHUP received, reloading
configuration;
Oct 4 06:25:05 beteigeuze syslog-ng[3953]: Duplicate stats cou
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 393734
Bug#393734: debian-zh-faq: FTBFS: tetex/texlive conflict
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> severity 393734 important
Bug#393734: debian-zh-faq: FTBFS: tetex/texlive conflict
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopp
Good Afternoon ,
Find out how to make 1.5 - 3.5k per day from home.
800.538.6704
Call me at my number if you can return calls.
Respects,
Monte Mayer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Ohura-san!
On Mit, 18 Okt 2006, OHURA Makoto wrote:
> I've uploaded 1.09-1 this morning (JST) with setting
> urgency=medium. Your patch is very helpful for me.
Thanks for uploading an updated patch and your continued support. I hope
you don't mind if we (from debian-tex-maint) now and the
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:23:56AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
> I see this in your build log, followed by the "libtool errors" which are just
> caused by this library being missing in the install directory:
>
> /usr/bin/install -c -p .libs/libkolabwizard.soT
> /tmp/buildd/kdepim-
Hi
Sorry for not being very active over the course of the summer (new job
and everything). I am, however, prepared to pick up speed again and I
was wondering if it would be okay to upload version 3.2.6 to unstable
(with urgency=medium/high ?) now that we are getting pretty close to a
freeze? O
Package: python-vobject
Version: 0.4.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'python-vobject' on unstable,
I get the following error:
running install_egg_info
running egg_info
writing requirements to src/vobject.egg-info/requires.txt
writing src/vobject.egg-info/PKG-INFO
writing top-level
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 302240 !
Bug#302240: kaddressbook: strange handling of vcard-directory as
address-ressource
Changed Bug submitter from Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Bastian
Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> submitter 327113 !
Bug#327113: setterm -pow
The problem also happens with the old compiler (gcc-4.1_4.1.1-13)
installed.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Philippe Cloutier wrote:
>> Please provide a severity justification.
>
> Did you read the bugreport? The package is unusable.
Only on some hardware. The exact circumstances havn't been determined
yet, and I'm still unable to reproduce it on my notebook
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-vserver-powerpc
Version: 2.6.18-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
I have upgraded my box with a 2.6.18-1-vserver-powerpc kernel, and its the
third time my box completely freeze after some time (between 10 minutes and 1
hour): no more keyboar
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 393882 important
Bug#393882: linux-image-2.6.18-1-vserver-powerpc: system freezes eratically
with no reason [powerpc, vserver]
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> tags 393882 moreinfo
Bug#393882: linux-image-2.6.18-1-vserver-powerpc
ghdl_0.24+gcc4.1.1-1 can be compiled with a current version of sid.
So it seems pretty clear this bug is due to a change from 0.24 to
0.25.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
severity 393882 important
tags 393882 moreinfo
thanks
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 11:10:46AM +0200, Bruno Beaufils wrote:
> I have upgraded my box with a 2.6.18-1-vserver-powerpc kernel, and its the
> third time my box completely freeze after some time (between 10 minutes and 1
> hour): no more keyboa
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 05:15:14PM +0200, J??r??my Bobbio wrote:
> python-wxgtk2.4 has not been transitioned to the new Debian policy.
This should be fixed. Anyone familiar with the changes required,
please do so. I don't have time to come up to speed on this
immediately.
> This now breaks pack
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 02:33:39 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392423: fixed in tetex-base 3.0.dfsg.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> Sorry for not being very active over the course of the summer (new job
> and everything). I am, however, prepared to pick up speed again and I
> was wondering if it would be okay to upload version 3.2.6 to unstable
> (with urgency=me
Package: python-vobject
Version: 0.4.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'python-vobject' on unstable,
I get the following error:
running install_egg_info
running egg_info
writing requirements to src/vobject.egg-info/requires.txt
writing src/vobject.egg-info/PKG-INFO
writing top-level
On 10/18/06, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, it doesn't hurt. And I also trust him. So, I have added it.
Please get the updated version at the old place.
Please hold on. His recent comment helps me understand
the script better. I will adjust the postinst script first.
This one time, at band camp, Lucas Nussbaum said:
> On 17/10/06 at 19:27 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This one time, at band camp, Lucas Nussbaum said:
> > > On 17/10/06 at 14:37 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > > > Great. What is the output of
> > > > /usr/sbin/sendmail -d0 < /dev/null | head -1
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 03:02:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393400: fixed in nettle 1.14.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 03:32:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393751: fixed in caudium 2:1.4.9.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: hal
Version: 0.5.8.1-1
Severity: grave
Setting up hal (0.5.8.1-1) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/dbus-1/system.d/hal.conf ...
Reloading system message bus config.
Starting Hardware abstraction layer: hald/usr/sbin/hald already running.
Errors were encountered while proces
Op wo, 18-10-2006 te 09:53 +0200, schreef Stefan Potyra:
> Hi Arjan,
>
> Am Freitag 13 Oktober 2006 00:35 schrieb Arjan Oosting:
> > Op do, 12-10-2006 te 15:53 +0200, schreef Stefan Potyra:
> >
> > > The problem now is, that it FTBFS on sparc, see [1]. Not quite sure if
> > > this is an ubuntu onl
Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.65-7
Severity: serious
Hello,
> Automatic build of db4.5_4.5.20-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 98
> Build started at 20061018-0941
> **
...
> Unpacking java-gcj-compat (from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> severity 393896 serious
Bug#393896: haskell-http: FTBFS with ghc6 6.6 (missing build-dep on
libghc6-network-dev)
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
>
End of message, stoppin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 384006 help
Bug#384006: xine-ui: fails to start
There were no tags set.
Tags added: help
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
reassign 393881 im-sdk
severity 393881 grave
merge 392909 393881
thanks
At Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:00:16 +0200,
Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Package: mlterm
> Version: 2.9.3-3
> Severity: serious
>
> When building 'mlterm' on unstable, I get the following error:
>
> im_iiimf.c:56:21: error: iiimcf.h: No
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Only on some hardware. The exact circumstances havn't been determined
> yet, and I'm still unable to reproduce it on my notebook with i810
> driver.
I hardly think that it is hardware dependend. I could verify it on
different i386 and am64 systems, with completely differe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 389010 critical
Bug#389010: eclipse fulls /tmp
Severity set to `critical' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs data
Package: ttf-opensymbol
Version: 2.0.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
budha:~# apt-get install ttf-opensymbol/unstable
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Selected version 2.0.4-1 (Debian:unstable) for ttf-opensymbol
ttf-opensymbol is already
Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.3-1
Severity: serious
Prevents proper unattended installation of apache2.2-common:
Setting up apache2.2-common (2.2.3-1) ...
touch: cannot touch `/var/log/apache2/error.log': No such file or directory
touch: cannot touch `/var/log/apache2/access.log': No suc
Johannes Graumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: tetex-bin
> Version: 3.0-21
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> I'm not sure this is specific to the ConTeXt related modifications I
> originally made on my system, but a complete purge and reinstall of
> all tet
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:26:54PM +0930, Ron wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 05:15:14PM +0200, J??r??my Bobbio wrote:
> > python-wxgtk2.4 has not been transitioned to the new Debian policy.
>
> This should be fixed. Anyone familiar with the changes required,
> please do so. I don't have time t
Package: vlc
Version: 0.8.6-svn20061008.debian-1
Severity: grave
Since I upgraded yesterday, vlc won't work anymore. It starts fine,
but whever I open a movie (file or dvd), it crashes with the following
error:
X Error of failed request: BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)
Major opcode of fa
> > Could you please tell me how to apply the patch?
>
> It looks like the tabs in the patch have been converted to spaces. Try
> using the -l (ignore whitespace changes) option to patch.
Thanks, that did the trick.
However, the patched seems not to achieve anything.
I am still getting the same
On 10/18/06, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/18/06, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, it doesn't hurt. And I also trust him. So, I have added it.
> Please get the updated version at the old place.
Please hold on. His recent comment helps me u
iately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.65-7
Severity: serious
Hello,
> Automatic build of db4.5_4.5.20-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 98
> Build started at 2
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:14:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line typo3-src-4.0 accepted
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Hi Ian,
I have prepared a diff.gz for the new upstream release. It seems only
upgrading is not enough to fix the FTBFS as hslibs (package util,
package lang etc) are not shipped anymore. So I did a little bit of
hacking.
I could not test the build with GHC 6.6 yet as libghc6-readline-dev is
not
Package: libswt3.1-gtk-gcj
Version: 3.1.2-2
Severity: serious
libswt3.1-gtk-gcj (all eclipse -gcj package) lacks a dependency against
the libgcj package
Bastian
--
Immortality consists largely of boredom.
-- Zefrem Cochrane, "Metamorphosis", stardate 3219.8
signature.asc
Descr
reassign 393909 fontconfig
thanks
Am Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2006 14:01 schrieb Ryan:
> budha:~# apt-get install ttf-opensymbol/unstable
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> Selected version 2.0.4-1 (Debian:unstable) for ttf-opensymbol
> ttf-opensymbol is already the
Hi
It looks like I still have the same problem as David Nusinow reportet in
bugreport 390943. When I try to upgrading x11-common from 1:7.1.0-3 to
1:7.1.0-4 I get an error
The error aptitude returned are in Danish, but I hope you can make a
mening out of it. I have made som translations
Gør k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
2.0.4-1 seems ok
- --
Paolo Cavallini
email+jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.faunalia.it
Piazza Garibaldi 5 - 56025 Pontedera (PI), Italy Tel: (+39)348-3801953
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Moz
Package: gaim-meanwhile
Followup-For: Bug #391244
gaim 2.0 includes support for meanwhile in the base package. I just
verified this by upgrading to it and was able to connect to my existing
sametime server.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT poli
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:25:59AM +0200, kaouete wrote:
> Hi,
>
> libapache2-mod-python is a virtual package for
> libapache2-mod-python2.3 so when i installed this version of trac
> it removes libapache2-mod-python !
Looking at the file list for libapache-mod-python, I see it does not provide
a
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:41:29 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 393909 fontconfig
Bug#393909: amd64: ttf-opensymbol package cannot be configured or removed
Bug reassigned from package `ttf-opensymbol' to `fontconfig'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393431: fixed in bittorrent 3.4.2-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hello Alastair,
AFAICT Eugeniy's analysis shows that this issue is unrelated to his patch
for #384787, but rather a separate slang issue.
What is your take on it and how can we best proceed to resolve it?
If at all possible, I'd like to see it resolved before the RC1 release,
but that is going
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 390786 393910
Bug#390786: apache2.2-common: cannot touch /var/log/apache2/error.log
Bug#393910: (no subject)
Bug#390789: apache2.2-common_2.2.3-1 postinst error
Bug#391864: apache2.2-common: install fails because all mod-enabled packages
tes
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383744: fixed in bittorrent 3.4.2-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:01:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393915: crashes with X error when starting playing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Hi Arjan,
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 02:55:45PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
>
> I have prepared a diff.gz for the new upstream release.
Thanks, I'll take a look.
> I could not test the build with GHC 6.6 yet as libghc6-readline-dev is
> not available yet.
It should be provided by ghc6 - please l
You are right off course ... after deleting /usr/share/texmf* everything goes
fine ... just the constant errors that all kinds of subdirectories under
/usr/lib/X11/fonts/ are missing remain ...
Thanks, Joh
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Gesendet: 1
Am Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2006 15:42 schrieb Paolo Cavallini:
> 2.0.4-1 seems ok
What exactly? The chart issue(s) you mean?
Or both?
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | G
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 393582 patch
Bug#393582: hmake: FTBFS with ghc 6.6
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch
> usertag 393582 supplied-patch
Bug#393582: hmake: FTBFS with ghc 6.6
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: supplied-patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing her
Thomas Ter-Borch wrote:
Hi
It looks like I still have the same problem as David Nusinow reportet in
bugreport 390943. When I try to upgrading x11-common from 1:7.1.0-3 to
1:7.1.0-4 I get an error
Gør klar til at erstatte x11-common 1:7.1.0-3 (med .../x11-common_1%
3a7.1.0-4_i386.deb)...
Udpak
tag 393582 patch
usertag 393582 supplied-patch
thanks
Op wo, 18-10-2006 te 15:15 +0100, schreef Ian Lynagh:
> Hi Arjan,
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 02:55:45PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> >
> > I have prepared a diff.gz for the new upstream release.
>
> Thanks, I'll take a look.
>
> > I could
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:32:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391765: fixed in suphp 0.6.1-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391765: fixed in suphp 0.6.1.20060928-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: r-cran-rpart
Version: 3.1.32-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
~$ R
R : Copyright 2006, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
Version 2.3.1 (2006-06-01)
ISBN 3-900051-07-0
R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
You are welcome to redistri
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:32:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393627: fixed in suphp 0.6.1-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:32:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393627: fixed in suphp 0.6.1-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Frans Pop wrote:
> Hello Alastair,
>
> AFAICT Eugeniy's analysis shows that this issue is unrelated to his patch
> for #384787, but rather a separate slang issue.
>
> What is your take on it and how can we best proceed to resolve it?
>
> If at all possible, I'd like to see it resolved before the R
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 384006 important
Bug#384006: xine-ui: fails to start
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:32:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391765: fixed in suphp 0.6.1-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391765: fixed in suphp 0.6.1.20060928-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 09:17:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382287: fixed in chiark-tcl 1.0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 392709 wishlist
Bug#392709: mol-modules-source: kmod/_fault.c does not compile for powerpc64
(G5)
Bug#392705: mol-modules-source: kmod/_fault.c does not compile for powerpc64
(G5)
Severity set to `wishlist' from `grave'
> retitle 392709 add
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 09:17:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362806: fixed in chiark-tcl 1.0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
1 - 100 of 261 matches
Mail list logo
