merge 369173 316572
retitle 369173 Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or
--allow-unauthenticated
severity 369173 important
thanks
This is an apt-build bug. Installing apt-key does not fix the problem of
apt-build creating unsigned packages. These unsigned packages will cau
Your message dated Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:47:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389463: fixed in xmms-sid 0.7.4+0.8.0beta15-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 316572
Bug#316572: WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> severity 316572 important
Bug#316572: WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
Severity set to `important' from `
An easier workaround is to simply:
export FANCYTTY=0
before running apt-get dist-upgrade.
I don't know what this really does but it seems
to do the job for me.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg
Version: 4.1.1-nf1
Severity: serious
In previous versions of gcc-4.1-doc (up to 4.1.1-10),
/usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-doc was a symlink to gcc-4.1-base. Because
dpkg follows the symlink when upgrading the package, your files end up
in /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base, overwri
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346721: fixed in gtalk 0.99.10-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Could you try upgrading xserver-xorg-xxx to unstable version to see
whether the problem persists in later versions?
Just tried that, setting source.list to unstable, starting interactive
aptitude, and trying to '+' various xorg-related packages. All
of them seemed to run afoul of
xserver_xorg
Package: maxima
Version: 5.10.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
The maxima program depends on gcl version 2.6.7-22 that can not be found in the
amd64 repository.
Gcl 2.6.22 builds nicely and after installation, maxima builds nicely as well.
-- System Information:
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390019: fixed in gtalk 0.99.10-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags #386554 confirmed
Bug#386554: exim4-config: update-exim4.conf does not complain about invalid
spit_config value
Tags were: pending
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
Package: libsensors3
Version: 1:2.10.1-1
Severity: grave
From my pbuilder build log for cpufreqd:
...
Setting up libsensors3 (2.10.1-1+pb1) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libsensors3.postinst: line 11:
/usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing libsensors3 (--configu
Package: gcl
Version: 2.6.7-22
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
For some reason gcl version 2.6.22 is not in the amd64 repository. This breaks
the
compilation of maxima that depends on this version. The package however compiles
nicely on amd64 so I guess it is a simpl
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 03:13 +0200, Krzysztof Sobiecki wrote:
> I have made small patch(low quality) to compile libgecko-cil with
> xulrunner. (license same as package)
Thanks for the patch, but gecko-sharp is dead, it's not going in testing
anymore. gecko-sharp2 is used instead, which uses xulrunn
tags #386554 confirmed
thanks
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 03:23:41PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> when split_config in u4cc is set to 'false'! (note the exclamation
> mark), /var/lib/exim4/config.autogenerated ends up empty (besides the
> "no not touch" disclaimer).
Andreas has fixed this in SVN.
Gree
Package: openoffice.org-writer
Version: 2.0.4~rc2-2
Severity: grave
openoffice.org-writer don't work on amd64, not at all. It hangs 100%
running every time I try to run it, only after writing a single word,
or after any other operation.
strace don't say anything, neither do ltrace.
Attach with g
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:45:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Now fixed, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
I would suggest renaming the binary -doc packages, and providing the
original ones.
Sven Joachim writes:
> Package: gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg
> Version: 4.1.1-nf1
> Severity: serious
>
> In previous versions of gcc-4.1-doc (up to 4.1.1-10),
> /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-doc was a symlink to gcc-4.1-base.
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:48:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FTBFS: b-d cannot be fulfiled, gnat version too high
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390085: fixed in lsb 3.1-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Package: gtk-sharp2
Version: 2.8.3-1
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log (on i386):
...
dh_clideps -a -d
dh_clideps: Warning! No Build-Depends(-Indep) on cli-common-dev (>= 0.4.4)!
dh_clideps: Warning: Could not resolve moduleref: libglib-2.0-0.dll for:
glib-sharp.dll!
dh_clideps: Warni
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:34:02 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line maxima: Maxima not built for amd64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:32:42 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390100: gcl: Gcl version 2.6.7-22 not built for amd64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Package: pdl
Version: 1:2.4.3-2
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log (on i386):
...
XX Processing glu.h
Running cpp on /usr/include/GL/glu.h
*** CPP command: cc -E -P -DGL_MESA_program_debug=0 -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE
-DTHREADS_HAVE_PIDS -DDEBIAN -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I/u
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389189: fixed in ltp 20060918-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
tags 369395 pending
thanks
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:45:21PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2006, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > since the LC_* settings were moved from /etc/environment to
> > /etc/default/locale pam_env no longer reads and sets them.
> > See /usr/share/doc/locales/N
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 11:46:00AM +0200, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> From my pbuilder build log (on i386):
>
> ...
> /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/perl/5.8.8/ExtUtils/xsubpp -typemap
> /usr/share/perl/5.8/ExtUtils/typemap -typemap
> /tmp/buildd/pdl-2.4.3/Basic/Core/typemap.pdl OpenGL.xs > OpenGL.xsc
Package: mozart
Version: 1.3.2.20060615-1
Severity: serious
emacs21 is now fixed finally on mips and mipsel, but mozart still fails to
build because it uses the $(PWD) variable in its debian/rules and this
variable is not preserved by sudo:
[...]
echo > build-stamp
/usr/bin/sudo debian/rules bin
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#272393: fixed in divine 0.8-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
reopen 389696
notfixed 389696 libwww-indexparser-perl 0.6-1
found 389696 libwww-indexparser-perl 0.6-1
thanks
There doesn't seem to be any actual change to the Build-Depends in the upload,
and I'm still getting the same build failure:
...
/usr/bin/make test
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/build
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 01:29:40PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> Just wanted to confirm that changing /etc/libnss-ldap.conf's
> permissions to 0644 fixes the problem.
But how did it get to 0600 in the first place? The postinst installs it to
0644... Did you ever change this? I'm unable to reproduc
Package: openoffice.org-calc
Version: 2.0.4~rc2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I'm not sure where to look for the culprit, but with the oo-calc is
unusable at least on my system. As soon as I enter two letters into one
cell the program needs 100% CPU and obviously doesn'
On Friday 29 September 2006 12:22 pm, you wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 11:46:00AM +0200, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > From my pbuilder build log (on i386):
> >
> > ...
> > /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/perl/5.8.8/ExtUtils/xsubpp -typemap
> > /usr/share/perl/5.8/ExtUtils/typemap -typemap
> > /tmp/buil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 389696
Bug#389696: libwww-indexparser-perl: FTBFS: Test failures
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> notfixed 389696 libwww-
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.86.ds1-27
Severity: serious
Hello,
the new initscripts package mounts ramfs filesystems into my chroots:
tmpfs /org/chroots/sid/lib/init/rw tmpfs rw,nosuid 0 0
additionally, it breaks on upgrade in my vservers:
Setting up initscripts (2.86.ds1-27) ...
mount: per
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:32:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390077: fixed in mpg123 0.60-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 10:54:36AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> I'm resending this mail, and include the porters list with hope for some
> help. We really won't be able to debug this problem without contact to
> someone who has at least read access to the affected buildds.
You can debug it by us
> tags 389720 + unreproducible moreinfo help
> You seem to have problem with the kernel part. What is the version of the
> kernel patch that you used for the kernel build?
1.2.11-rc1,
> If you make a new kernel using the latest kernel patches, do it work
> better for you?
this is the latest patc
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-22
Severity: serious
Tags: pending
>From postinst.in:
# if tetex-base is upgraded while tetex-bin is already installed, we must
# call mktexlr, and regenerate the formats and font maps.
clean_texenvironment
TEXINIT_P=""
KPSEWHICH=""
test -x `which
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 2.0.4~rc2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The newest version of openoffice.org crashes as soon as one tries to
open a file (i.e. in writer). The last message I get in the terminal
from which I started the program is something like:
/usr/l
Package: openoffice.org-writer
Version: 2.0.4~rc2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After the last upgrade I'm no longer able to start oowriter.
It give me the following messages:
dirname: missing operand
Try `dirname --help' for more information.
I18N: Operating system doe
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 10:54:36AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> I'm resending this mail, and include the porters list with hope for some
>> help. We really won't be able to debug this problem without contact to
>> someone who has at least read access
Blars Blarson wrote:
The files in /var/lib/hinfo are included indirectly in the default
/etc/hinfo.conf . You can modify /etc/hinfo.conf not to use them if
desired. Anternatly, you can override the settings in them by
modifying /etc/hinfo.conf .
The problem was with hinfo-update, which as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 387433 serious
Bug#387433: Stopping bluemon: invoke-rc.d: initscript bluemon, action "stop"
failed.
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> found 387433 1.3-1.1+b1
Bug#387433: Stopping bluemon: invoke-rc.d: initscript bluemon, action "stop"
Package: mailman
Version: 1:2.1.8-3
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Hi,
After upgrade to 2.1.8-3 version the /etc/init.d/script fails
and mail processing seems to stop.
/etc/init.d/mailman: line 47: log_daemon_msg: command not found
invoke-rc.d: initscript mailma
Hi
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:51:32PM +0200, Dariusz Pietrzak wrote:
> > tags 389720 + unreproducible moreinfo help
> > You seem to have problem with the kernel part. What is the version of the
> > kernel patch that you used for the kernel build?
> 1.2.11-rc1,
> > If you make a new kernel using
> Hi
> > Your 0.30.204 packages are working fine.
> I'll see what I can do.
Great, thanks.
--
Dariush Pietrzak,
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frank Küster wrote:
> The assumption above is wrong, or at least short-sighted. updmap-sys
> and fmtutil-sys can only be called when tetex-bin is there. However, we
> *must* call the update script under all circumstances. Otherwise
> tetex-bin will be without language information etc. I wonder
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Right but if it's not too hard and complex might be good.
>
> People should be using grub-install; if we still want compatibility I think
> it's
> an upstream decision.
>
> Mats, could you send your patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree with Rebert here.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steinar H. Gunderson написа:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 01:29:40PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>> Just wanted to confirm that changing /etc/libnss-ldap.conf's
>> permissions to 0644 fixes the problem.
>
> But how did it get to 0600 in the first place?
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389414: fixed in thunar 0.4.0rc1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 04:36:30PM +0400, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> It asks here via debconf. Perhaps the question is asked only the first
> time the package in installed. dpkg-reconfigure makes it ask the
> question again.
Hm.
The template says:
_Description: make configuration readable/writeabl
I'm blind , I didn't noticed this patch on gnome Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347358
without this blam didn't compiled(some warnings).
diff -rup blam-1.8.2/libblam/blam-gecko-utils.cpp
blam-1.8.2~/libblam/blam-gecko-utils.cpp
--- blam-1.8.2/libblam/blam-gecko-utils.cpp
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:02:47 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390129: fixed in tetex-base 3.0-23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
> Thanks for reporting the problem. Were you kind enough to also report
> it to Xvfb ? Maybe I should exclude sparc from the list of platforms where
> Xvfb is supposed to work. I really have no way to reproduce this error.
This is reportedly fixed in xvfb 1.1.1-9.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 07:42:03PM -0600, Berg, Michael wrote:
> A low entropy pool may be a contributing factor, but something definitely
> changed between libnss-ldap 238 and 251.
I guess this is the new reconnection logic introduced in 241.
> With libnss-ldap 238-1.2 installed
>
> $ cat /proc
This one time, at band camp, Steinar H. Gunderson said:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 07:42:03PM -0600, Berg, Michael wrote:
> > A low entropy pool may be a contributing factor, but something definitely
> > changed between libnss-ldap 238 and 251.
>
> I guess this is the new reconnection logic introdu
Hi Joshua,
Joshua Rodman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sun Sep 10 14:06:46 2006):
(...)
> I had been using uae across the earlier 0.8.22-1 version and more
> recently the 0.8.23-DATE versions from richard drummond with success.
> Recently UAE in unstable was updated to 0.8.25, so I updated to this
> versi
Package : openoffice.org
Version : 2.0.4~rc2-2
Here is the stack sent to STDERR when I click "help/about ..." :
Fatal exception: Signal 11
Stack:
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_sal.so.3[0xa71debbc]
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_sal.so.3[0xa71ded02]
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_sal.
Clint Adams writes:
> > Thanks for reporting the problem. Were you kind enough to also
> > report
> > it to Xvfb ? Maybe I should exclude sparc from the list of platforms where
> > Xvfb is supposed to work. I really have no way to reproduce this error.
>
> This is reportedly fixed i
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 2.0.4~rc2-2
Followup-For: Bug #390133
I attach the output of ooimpress when trying to open a ppt file, and
the output of oowriter when opening a .sxw file. In both cases openoffice
crashes
just after starting.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 390127 + pending
Bug#390127: mozart_1.3.2.20060615-1: FTBFS with -rsudo
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Steve Langasek writes:
> Package: mozart
> Version: 1.3.2.20060615-1
> Severity: serious
>
> emacs21 is now fixed finally on mips and mipsel, but mozart still fails to
> build because it uses the $(PWD) variable in its debian/rules and this
> variable is not preserved by sudo:
>
Thanks
Frank Küster wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 10:54:36AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> >
> >> I'm resending this mail, and include the porters list with hope for some
> >> help. We really won't be able to debug this problem without contact to
> >> so
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> The assumption above is wrong, or at least short-sighted. updmap-sys
>> and fmtutil-sys can only be called when tetex-bin is there. However, we
>> *must* call the update script under all circumstances. Otherwise
>> tetex-bin wil
Frank Küster wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I don't understand. Shouldn't tetex-bin call the update-* scripts before
>> generating formats/map files/...
>>
>> [Looking into common.functions.in]
>>
>> It seems it doesn't. IMO that's the bigger problem.
>
> I think every pack
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 2.0.4~rc2-2
Followup-For: Bug #390133
Just in case it helps: same here, with any file type (.ppt, .doc, .xls).
I'll attach the trace I get when trying to open an .xls file.
Cheers,
Tom
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstabl
hello,
gdm itself runs in the system locale, but when it creates a new login
that is where pam comes into play. Perhaps gdm should use the locale
itself runs in for the "system default" locale setting,but obviously it
doesn't.
the patch supplied earlier really fixes the bug. it don't see that
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>> With libnss-ldap 238-1.2 installed
>>
>> $ cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail; \
>> getent passwd user_in_ldap; \
>> cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail
>> 3585
>> passwd entry here
>> 129
>
> Are you sure it's not falling back to non-TLS here? Or lo
Package: mysql-server-5.0
Version: 5.0.24a-5
Severity: grave
During a routine update of packages, I encountered an error with
mysql-server-5.0
in the execution of its preremoval script, from which dpkg was unable to
recover.
This unfortunately leave mysql-server-5.0 in a pretty bad state and the
Package: maxima
Version: 5.10.0-1
Severity: grave
Due to the wrong maxima paths (see #389825), shared packages do not
work. Here follows an example:
(%i1) 'diff (y, x, 2) + 'diff (y, x) + y;
2
d y dy
(%o1)
I think I get the same crash:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ oowriter Bewerbungsgespräche.odt
(soffice.bin:30996): Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in
module_path: "clearlooks",
This should only happen once
Fatal exception: Signal 11
Stack:
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_sal.so.3[0xb719c
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:28:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line DLJ prevents running jython with sun-java
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 08:45:18AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> [...]
> > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -g -Wall -O2 -Wall -c -o
> > stream/sink-tut.o stream/sink-tut.cc
> > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -g -Wall -O2 -Wall -c -o
> > stream/filters-tut.o stream/filters-tu
> Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>>> With libnss-ldap 238-1.2 installed
>>>
>>> $ cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail; \
>>> getent passwd user_in_ldap; \
>>> cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail
>>> 3585
>>> passwd entry here
>>> 129
>> Are you sure it's not falling back to non-TLS her
Package: libncursesw5-dbg
Version: 5.5-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
(Reading database ... 246039 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libncursesw5-dbg 5.5-3 (using
.../libncursesw5-dbg_5.5-4_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libncursesw5-dbg ...
dpkg: error processing
/v
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 389663 important
Bug#389663: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686 freeze notebook Toshiba with HT technology.
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> severity 389686 important
Bug#389686: linux-image-2.6.17-2-amd64: Kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:121
Sever
notfound 385044 1.13.22
found 385044 1.10.28
thanks
Hi,
If I understand the previous emails correctly the bug is fixed in sid
but is still in stable, so I have adjusted the version in which the bugs
is found.
Greetings Arjan Oosting
signature.asc
Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal onder
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:18:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369517: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:18:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389296: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.1.1-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When starting the X server on a dual-head amd64 system, it fails to initialise
the screen, and ends up halting on a black screen. The X server process remains
running, but one cannot do anything
Hello,
> Hi,
> After upgrade to 2.1.8-3 version the /etc/init.d/script fails
> and mail processing seems to stop.
>
> /etc/init.d/mailman: line 47: log_daemon_msg: command not found
> invoke-rc.d: initscript mailman, action "start" failed.
Thanks for your report... this has to do with the ne
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 384146 + fixed
Bug#384146: plptools: FTBFS (amd64): conflicting declaration 'typedef long long
unsigned int u_int64_t'
Tags were: patch
Bug#386833: plptools: FTBFS (i386/gcc-4.1) bad
Bug#388831: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: specialization of 'Enum::sdata::s
Hi!
I've just uploaded an NMU of plptools to fix #384146, #386833 and
#388831, based on Mike O'Connor's patch in #386833.
The complete patch is attached.
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7
Hi there,
Could you run /usr/sbin/blootbotsetup manyally for me and tell me the
output (if any)?
Does anythign appear in the logs in /var/log/blootbot/ ?
Many thanks,
Neil
--
* stockholm calls netapp
* stockholm calls someone else
you are typing random numbers on your phone?
yes. my newest at
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:51:18AM -0600, Berg, Michael wrote:
> I have also verified TLS operation with my currently installed (and
> working) libnss-ldap version 238 by capturing loopback traffic with
> wireshark/ethereal and performing multiple back-to-back "getent passwd"
> commands which (as d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 385044 1.13.22
Bug#385044: start-stop-daemon when used with --exec and --stop should warn
loudly
Bug marked as not found in version 1.13.22.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
> found 385044 1.10.28
Bug#385044: start-stop-dae
hello alexandre,
does it also break with the most recent granule 1.2.2.-1 in unstable?
If not, then lets close this bugreport so that the recent granule can enter
testing.
Ciao, cc
___
Viren-Scan für Ihren PC! Jetzt für jeden. S
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:41:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Duplicate bug report,already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:12:53PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Perhaps we should try a binary search across upstream versions?
OK, it seems to be related to changed behaviour in libldap -- not very
surprising, as libnss-ldap uses internal functions. Basically, ldap_ld_free()
changed behav
Package: sun-java5
Version: 1.5.0-08-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
Section 2.3 of the Debian Policy Manual says that Debian reserves "the right to
restrict
files from being included anywhere in our archives if their use or distribution
would
break a law".
AFAICT Debian is in
Hi,
despite all tips, this is still a plea to the people with access to the
buildds.
Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks like the build creates font files with root permissions, and
> can't alter them lateron when running without elevated privileges.
> So any environment with re
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed in principle (see below). However, I think it is also important
> that every package that calls fmtutil/updmap/... has to call the
> apropriate update-* scripts before, which tetex-bin does not at the moment.
>
> Just imagine that instead of tetex-b
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:02:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390138: fixed in mailman 1:2.1.8-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369395: fixed in openssh 1:4.3p2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 04:11:23PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
>
> This is weird for me: I include , which defines
> those operators. And I use the wibble::operators namespace. And in
> other architectures (arm, powerpc, sparc, and my i386 laptop) it seems
> to have compiled properly.
This is pro
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:47:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390126: fixed in sysvinit 2.86.ds1-28
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
I'm all for Community Edition; please work something like that out if possible.And Debian is still allowed to refer the metapackage firefox to the new renamed package, right?Licenses always give me headaches; please come to an agreement..
Package: debarchiver
Version: 0.6.4
Severity: serious
Hello Ola,
There is an error when attempting to purge debarchiver:
Removing debarchiver ...
Purging configuration files for debarchiver ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/debarchiver.postrm: line 22: userdel: command not found
dpkg: error processi
On Fre, 29 Sep 2006, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> A general point: Recently I was thinking whether it would make sense to
> change the behaviour of 'format providing packages' such as tetex-base
> or jadetex: Right now they regerenate all formats, even though this is
> not necessary. Why not have them reg
Package: libapt-pkg-dev
Version: 0.6.46
Severity: grave
Hello,
while building libept at home I noticed that it suddenly and obscurely
cannot link to -lapt-pkg anymore.
mvo told me that the bug has already been found on ubuntu:
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.1/+bug/62461
and t
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
