Processed: Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 369815 -1 Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc Bug 369815 cloned as bug 372850. > reassign -1 heartbeat-2 Bug#372850: ships binary in /etc Bug reassigned from package `heartbeat' to `heartbeat-2'. > found -1 2.0.5-3 Bug#372850: ships binary in /etc

Bug#366948: xfig can't find fonts

On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:40:03PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > I think the patch might need a few more tweaks still, though; I'll ponder it > > and commit a fix to the svn repo this weekend. > Nice, thanks. But see comments below about xfonts-utils.postinst. > > > - Steve, despite you talk

Bug#370671: [Fwd: Re: Can you repro with XOrg 7?]

Thanks Johan, I'll see what I can do. I note, however, that the latest version of gnome-applets is ready to go into testing (as indicated on the web page http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=gnome-applets), except for this release-critical bug. Since the bug was filled against the

Bug#372796: ImportError: No module named eric3config

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bob Tanner wrote: > On Sunday 11 June 2006 14:30, you wrote: >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "/usr/share/eric/modules/eric3.py", line 30, in ? >> from UI.SplashScreen import SplashScreen, NoneSplashScreen >> File "/usr/share/eric/

Processed: finally really sent to control for real at last

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 366948 -1 Bug#366948: xfig can't find fonts Bug is marked as being merged with others. > reassign -1 xfonts-utils 1:1.0.0-4 Bug number -1 not found. > retitle -1 update-scale-fonts: fails on empty dirs Bug number -1 not found. > tags -1 = patch

Bug#370674: apticron: argument list for apt-listchanges isn't built properly

On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 12:04:27 +0200, Michael Kaaden wrote: > Looking into this, I assume line 90 > > if [ `ls ${PKGPATH}${PKG}_${VERFILE}_*.deb >& /dev/null` ] ; then > > to be the source of the problem. It is. ls will not produce any output (due to the redirection to /dev/null), so the test ([

Bug#372850: marked as done (ships binary in /etc)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 00:47:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372850: fixed in heartbeat-2 2.0.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#369815: marked as done (ships binary in /etc)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 00:47:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#369815: fixed in heartbeat 1.2.4-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#370671: [Fwd: Re: Can you repro with XOrg 7?]

Johan Walles wrote: If the version that wants to go into testing resolves the problem for you, then it should go into testing. But since this is probably a bug in X.org which is just triggered by the Gnome panel, my guess is that the bug is triggered by both the version in Testing and in Unstab

Processed: Re: Processed: finally really sent to control for real at last

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > unmerge 366948 Bug#366948: xfig can't find fonts Bug#362911: gsfonts-x11: Fonts not installed properly Disconnected #366948 from all other report(s). > clone 366948 -1 Bug#366948: xfig can't find fonts Bug 366948 cloned as bug 372858. > merge 366948 3

Bug#370671: [Fwd: Re: Can you repro with XOrg 7?]

If the version that wants to go into testing resolves the problem for you, then it should go into testing. But since this is probably a bug in X.org which is just triggered by the Gnome panel, my guess is that the bug is triggered by both the version in Testing and in Unstable. But that's just a

Bug#372734: base-config: solution the problem

Package: base-config Version: 2.53.10.1 Followup-For: Bug #372734 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.5 Locale: LANG=hu_HU, LC_CTYPE=hu_HU (charmap=ISO-8859-2) Versions of packages base-config depends on: ii adduser 3.63

Bug#372700: euro-support-x depends on removed xfonts-base-transcoded

* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060611 23:47]: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 09:42:28AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > this package depends on the removed xfonts-base-transcoded. > > BTW, this package did not depend: on it, xfonts-base-transcoded was in the > Recommends: line so

Bug#372871: xfce4-notes-plugin - FTBFS: Package xfce4-panel-1.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path

e if your libraries > are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. > make: *** [config.status] Error 1 > ** > Build finished at 20060612-1049 > FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- To UNSUBSCR

Bug#370671: [Fwd: Re: Can you repro with XOrg 7?]

To be honest, I avoided commenting the "still broken" case, since I really don't know :-). Asking those who make the decisions as you suggested earlier sounds like a good idea to me! Cheers //Johan 2006/6/12, Frederic Schutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Johan Walles wrote: > If the version that want

Bug#372531: found 372531 in 0.5.2-1.1sarge1, notfound 372531 in 0.7.2-2

tags 372531 sarge found 372531 0.5.2-1.1sarge1 notfound 372531 0.7.2-2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#372860: lirc - FTBFS: Uses kernel headers provided by glibc

`/build/buildd/lirc-0.8.0' > make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/lirc-0.8.0' > make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 > ** > Build finished at 20060612-0848 > FAILE

Processed: Re: Bug#372860: lirc - FTBFS: Uses kernel headers provided by glibc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 372860 linux-kernel-headers 2.6.16.20-1 Bug#372860: lirc - FTBFS: Uses kernel headers provided by glibc Bug reassigned from package `lirc' to `linux-kernel-headers'. > forcemerge 372770 372860 Bug#372770: linux-kernel-headers: kernel_ulong_t n

Bug#214623: Antique RC bugs (many about licensing)

On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 03:02:31PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Daniel Kobras wrote: > > I'm still concerned about the change, though. You're removing the > > logo first, then add a different one. Are you certain that this is > > sufficiently distinct from modifying the logo,

Bug#370671: dpkg -l xorg

> Can you do "dpkg -l xorg"? Sure I can. zulu:~# dpkg -l xorg No packages found matching xorg. zulu:~# dpkg -l xserver-xorg Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Stat

Bug#372860: lirc - FTBFS: Uses kernel headers provided by glibc

ectory `/build/buildd/lirc-0.8.0' > > make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/lirc-0.8.0' > > make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 > > ** > > Build finished at 20060612-0848 > > FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] > Directly includi

Processed: Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#372871: xfce4-notes-plugin - FTBFS: Package xfce4-panel-1.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 372871 +upstream Bug#372871: xfce4-notes-plugin - FTBFS: Package xfce4-panel-1.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > retitle 372871 FTBFS on new panel Bug#372871: xfce4-notes-plugin - FTBFS:

Bug#372871: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#372871: xfce4-notes-plugin - FTBFS: Package xfce4-panel-1.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path

#x27; found > > configure: error: Library requirements (xfce4-panel-1.0 >= 4.1.90) not met; > > consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your > > libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. > > make: *** [config.status] Error 1 &

Processed: tagging 372858

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > tags 372858 pending Bug#372858: update-scale-fonts: fails on empty dirs Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you nee

Processed: found 372531 in 0.5.2-1.1sarge1, notfound 372531 in 0.7.2-2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 372531 sarge Bug#372531: wzdftpd-mod-tcl 0.5.2-1.1sarge1 can't be installed There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge > found 372531 0.5.2-1.1sarge1 Bug#372531: wzdftpd-mod-tcl 0.5.2-1.1sarge1 can't be installed Bug marked as found in version 0.5.

Bug#370671: The same problem

The same problem appears when I try to add another keyboard layout using gnome keyboard properties configuration dialog. Addind another layout with setxkbmap works fine, however. I'll try ltrace tomorrow. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Processed: severity of 372844 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 372844 serious Bug#372844: speex: Missing dependency on libogg0 Severity set to `serious' from `grave' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administra

Bug#372487: same here

Package: python-numarray Version: 1.5.1-2 Followup-For: Bug #372487 i wonder why maintainers don't at least install their package before uploading... -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental'

Bug#371062: Bug#371060: libgcj7-dev

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Koch wrote: [...] > IMO its now the best time to get rid of this package totally. Its not > needed anymore. GNU JAXP was merged into GNU classpath some time ago. > The only package depending on it is libjfreereport-java. I think we can > just r

Bug#372880: eclipse can't start: problem opening page

Package: eclipse Version: 3.1.2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi Michael, I have problem running eclipse in Etch (it was also the case with Sid). When launching /usr/bin/eclise, I have the splash screnn, then an error window appears with: "Problems Opening page". When

Bug#365875: No Text in Gtk widgets of xmms

reassign 365875 xfonts-utils forcemerge 372858 365875 thanks Hi Toufeeq, On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 02:13:41PM +0530, Toufeeq Hussain wrote: > On 6/3/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Hi Toufeeq, > >Are you still able to reproduce this problem in xmms? If so, please > >send to the

Processed: Re: Bug#365875: No Text in Gtk widgets of xmms

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 365875 xfonts-utils Bug#365875: No Text in Gtk widgets of xmms Bug reassigned from package `xmms' to `xfonts-utils'. > forcemerge 372858 365875 Bug#372858: update-scale-fonts: fails on empty dirs Bug#365875: No Text in Gtk widgets of xmms Forc

Bug#372887: libtonezone1: missing libtonezone.so.1 symlink

Package: libtonezone1 Severity: serious Hi, The libtonezone.so.1 symlink is missing from the libtonezone1 package, making it unusable as is. JB. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bi

Bug#352690: marked as done (haskell-src-exts_0.2-2(m68k/unstable/vault13): FTBFS on m68k)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:12:02 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line haskell-src-exts_0.2-2(m68k/unstable/vault13): FTBFS on m68k has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#372903: fvwm1: ..upgrade fails on symlink typo? in post-install

Package: fvwm1 Version: 1.24r-50 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Reading changelogs... Done Extracting templates from packages: 100% Preconfiguring packages ... (Reading database ... 671174 files and directories currently installed.) Setting up fvwm1 (1.24r-50)

Bug#348668: attn: Steve Kemp (Re: Bug#348668: retrying and reproduce #348668)

On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 11:05:05AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:19:22AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > The gnump3d bug never affected me ("what is gnump3d?"), but I somehow > > stumbled upon it and noticed the s-s-d message, which I filed against > > udev, since

Bug#363236: xprint: doesn't print truetype anymore

Hi Drew, Given that users will not be able to keep the sarge version of xprint on their systems when upgrading to etch due to the /usr/X11R6/bin transition, currently the choices for users are to have an xprint with this bug, or no xprint at all. In light of this, do you believe that grave is the

Bug#370149: FTBFS: not compatible with FreeType 2.2

David wroteL > Yeah, I realized after I wrote the above that there was no fix. This is... > bad. ;( It's a damn, damn shame no one noticed earlier. We could have asked the freetype maintainer to hold back from uploading 2.2 until it was sorted out. No use crying over spilt milk, however, I suppo

Bug#372244: python-serial installation error

I'm still unable to reproduce that behaviour, even in a fresh chroot. Mark Robinson writes: > FYI Tiger threw up these warnings too: > > NEW: --WARN-- [lin001w] File `/usr/X11R6/bin/dh_pycentral' does not belong > > to any package. > > NEW: --WARN-- [lin001w] File `/usr/X11R6/bin/py_compilefiles'

Bug#372471: marked as done (wrong build-depends on libbuffy, should be (>= 0.7.1))

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 05:47:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372471: fixed in buffy 0.11.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#372913: gcc-4.1: datatype limits / signedness differs with optimization levels

Package: gcc-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Use this little example to see what's happening: #include int main(void) { char c = '\0'; do { printf("%d\n", c); c++; } while (c != '\0');

Bug#372914: idle-python2.3: .."to new" version?!?!?! breaks aptitude upgrade.

Package: idle-python2.3 Version: 2.3.5-12 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software a45:~# umount -v /usr/local ;aptitude clean ;aptitude update ;aptitude ;aptitude clean ; mount -v /usr/local /dev/hda9 umounted Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Rea

Processed: Fixed in NMU of libbuffy 0.8.0-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 372488 + fixed Bug#372488: FTBFS: ambiguous exceptions with gcc 4.1 Tags were: confirmed fixed-upstream patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (a

Bug#348668: attn: Steve Kemp (Re: Bug#348668: retrying and reproduce #348668)

On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:19:12AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: >> Since nobody seems to be able to reproduce this, and this probably was fixed >> in debconf 1.4.72 (if I understand you right), I'm closing this. > Correct. Did you try to reproduce with older debconf and unset > DISPLAY? No, I didn

Bug#372244: python-serial installation error

On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:16:40PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > I'm still unable to reproduce that behaviour, even in a fresh chroot. > > Mark Robinson writes: > > FYI Tiger threw up these warnings too: > > > NEW: --WARN-- [lin001w] File `/usr/X11R6/bin/dh_pycentral' does not > > > belong to an

Bug#372931: therion_0.3.10-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: thlocale.h:22: error: extra qualification 'thlocale::' on member 'format_human_length'

Package: therion Version: 0.3.10-1 Severity: serious Hello, There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > g++ -c -Wall -DTHLINUX -O2 -o thtmpdir.o thtmpdir.cxx > g++ -c -Wall -DTHLINUX -O2 -o thlocale.o thlocale.cxx > thlocale.h:22: error: extra qualification 'thlocale::' on membe

Processed: reassign 372757 to libgc1c2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > reassign 372757 libgc1c2 Bug#372757: inkscape crashes on startup Bug#371886: inkscape crashes during startup with ligc1c2 ver 6.7 installed Bug#371887: crashes during startup with lig

Processed: merging 372757 371886

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > merge 372757 371886 Bug#371886: inkscape crashes during startup with ligc1c2 ver 6.7 installed Bug#372757: inkscape crashes on startup Bug#371887: crashes during startup with ligc1c2

Bug#372913: assembler output...

I made a diff of the assembler code with -O0 and -O2: 1 --- test_O0 2006-06-12 15:30:56.0 +0200 2 +++ test_O2 2006-06-12 15:30:49.0 +0200 3 @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ 4 .file "test.c" 5 .text 6 + .p2align 4,,15 7 .glob

Processed: severity of 372757 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > severity 372757 grave Bug#372757: inkscape crashes on startup Severity set to `grave' from `normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Processed: merge python2.3 report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 372914 grave Bug#372914: idle-python2.3: .."to new" version?!?!?! breaks aptitude upgrade. Severity set to `grave' from `critical' > tags 372914 + pending Bug#372914: idle-python2.3: .."to new" version?!?!?! breaks aptitude upgrade. There were

Bug#363236: xprint: doesn't print truetype anymore

On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 05:37 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Drew, > > Given that users will not be able to keep the sarge version of xprint on > their systems when upgrading to etch due to the /usr/X11R6/bin transition, > currently the choices for users are to have an xprint with this bug, or no

Bug#347146: marked as done (xlbiff: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 06:47:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#347146: fixed in xlbiff 4.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Re: BOUNTY: files created by libquicktime0 not opened with same

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 359863 + moreinfo Bug#359863: BOUNTY: files created by libquicktime0 not opened with same There were no tags set. Bug#359861: files created by libquicktime0 not opened with same Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contac

Bug#372947: python2.3-numarray: .."move over!" ;o)

Package: python2.3-numarray Version: 1.5.1-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software a45:~# umount -v /usr/local ;aptitude clean ;aptitude update ;aptitude ;aptitude clean ; mount -v /usr/local /dev/hda9 umounted Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done

Bug#359863: BOUNTY: files created by libquicktime0 not opened with same

tag 359863 + moreinfo thanks On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 02:46:46AM -0700, Mark Washeim wrote: > I've been testing for the past 3 months and... dv 1394 captured material > (dvgrab 1.7 and 1.8) where quicktime is the format written but not able > to be read. Kino, for instance reports the file is not r

Bug#372903: fvwm1: ..upgrade fails on symlink typo? in post-install

On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Arnt Karlsen wrote: Package: fvwm1 Version: 1.24r-50 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software [...] I'm a bit confused here -- which unrelated package was broken? The postinst clearly needs fixing. I'll look at it ASAP. Thanks, Phil. -- To UNSUBSCR

Bug#372887: libtonezone1: missing libtonezone.so.1 symlink

Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The libtonezone.so.1 symlink is missing from the libtonezone1 package, making > it unusable as is. Fixed in SVN for 1.2.6-1. JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public key available on

Bug#302127: Better better patch

If --exec is not to be used, I suppose this patch, which uses --startas, would be the way to go. The problem is that the ntpd child processes, which are not listed in the pidfile, are pretty slow to go away if you SIGTERM the parent process. If that doesn't disturb anyone, this patch seems to

Processed: Re: Bug#372947: python2.3-numarray: .."move over!" ;o)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 372947 grave Bug#372947: python2.3-numarray: .."move over!" ;o) Severity set to `grave' from `critical' > merge 372947 372487 Bug#372487: python-numarray(-ext): Python-Version: syntax vs. pycentral Bug#372947: python2.3-numarray: .."move over

Bug#372903: fvwm1: ..upgrade fails on symlink typo? in post-install

On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:55:56 +0100 (BST), Phil wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > > Package: fvwm1 > > Version: 1.24r-50 > > Severity: critical > > Justification: breaks unrelated software > > [...] > > I'm a bit confused here -- which unrelated

Processed: severity of 372903 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > severity 372903 serious Bug#372903: fvwm1: ..upgrade fails on symlink typo? in post-install Severity set to `serious' from `critical' > End of message, stopping processing here. Ple

Bug#372244: marked as done (python-serial: cannot install ("loop over non-sequence"))

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 09:02:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372244: fixed in python-central 0.4.8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#372913: gcc-4.1: datatype limits / signedness differs with optimization levels

Am Montag, 12. Juni 2006 18:24 schrieb Bastian Blank: > char is neither signed nor unsigned. Only unsigned have defined overflow > behaviour. > > > } while (c != '\0'); > > > > return 0; > > } Alright, but why does this work differently using different versions of gcc or different

Bug#341305: marked as done (evolution-exchange-storage crashes constantly)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 09:17:03 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341305: fixed in evolution-exchange 2.6.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#372913: gcc-4.1: datatype limits / signedness differs with optimization levels

On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 06:39:27PM +0200, Erik Meusel wrote: > Alright, but why does this work differently using different versions of gcc > or > different optimization levels? That is the meaning of undefined behaviour. You can't predict anything. Therefor gcc is free to remove tests if it does

Bug#350425: Uninstallable bug

On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:35:11PM +0200, Cl??ment Stenac wrote: > Hello, > > Any progress on that problem ? Did you have some feedback on the > experimental versions ? Yes, these packages are no longer necessary for the ssh functionality, and are pending removal from sid. See #372793. -- dann

Bug#372913: gcc-4.1: datatype limits / signedness differs with optimization levels

On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 03:01:39PM +0200, Erik Meusel wrote: > Use this little example to see what's happening: > > #include > > int main(void) { > char c = '\0'; > > do { > printf("%d\n", c); %d is for int, not char: UB. > c++; char is neither

Bug#354436: marked as done (FTBFS on alpha, hppa, ia64, mips, mipsel)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:17:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354436: fixed in xine-lib 1.1.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#358429: marked as done (libxine1: new symbols introduced in 1.1.1 without shlibs bump)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:17:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#358429: fixed in xine-lib 1.1.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#368247: marked as done (amarok-xine: amarok crashes when xine's output plugin is set to arts)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:17:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#358429: fixed in xine-lib 1.1.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#372914: marked as done (idle-python2.3: .."to new" version?!?!?! breaks aptitude upgrade.)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 09:47:19 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372542: fixed in python2.3 2.3.5-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#336437: marked as done (libxine1: use of internal libmad makes other apps crash in amd64)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:17:23 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336437: fixed in xine-lib 1.1.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#372947: marked as done (python2.3-numarray: .."move over!" ;o))

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:02:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372947: fixed in python-numarray 1.5.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#358429: marked as done (libxine1: new symbols introduced in 1.1.1 without shlibs bump)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:17:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368247: fixed in xine-lib 1.1.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#372913: gcc-4.1: datatype limits / signedness differs with optimization levels

Erik Meusel wrote: > Am Montag, 12. Juni 2006 18:24 schrieb Bastian Blank: > > char is neither signed nor unsigned. Only unsigned have defined overflow > > behaviour. > > > > > } while (c != '\0'); > > > > > > return 0; > > > } > > Alright, but why does this work differently using

Bug#368247: marked as done (amarok-xine: amarok crashes when xine's output plugin is set to arts)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:17:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368247: fixed in xine-lib 1.1.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#372708: marked as done (idle-python2.3, version 2.3.5-12, fails to install)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 09:47:19 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372542: fixed in python2.3 2.3.5-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#369876: marked as done (CVE-2006-2802: buffer overflow in the HTTP input)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:17:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#369876: fixed in xine-lib 1.1.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#372244: python-serial installation error

Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > NEW: --WARN-- [lin001w] File `/usr/X11R6/bin/dh_pycentral' does not belong >> > to any package. >> > NEW: --WARN-- [lin001w] File `/usr/X11R6/bin/py_compilefiles' does not >> > belong to any package. >> > NEW: --WARN-- [lin001w] File `/usr/X11R6/bi

Bug#372542: marked as done (idle-python2.3.postinst fails with 'register-python: command not found')

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 09:47:19 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372542: fixed in python2.3 2.3.5-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#318719: marked as done (tecnoballz: Segfaults on startup on 64-bit machines)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 09:47:23 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318719: fixed in tecnoballz 0.91cvs20060612-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#372152: marked as done (g++-4.1: PR27935 appears to be unresolved (operator delete(void*, size_t) issue))

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:32:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372559: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#372559: marked as done (gecode: FTBFS with g++-4.1: no suitable operator)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:32:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372559: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#372559: marked as done (gecode: FTBFS with g++-4.1: no suitable operator)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:32:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372152: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#372605: marked as done (FTBFS: parse.y: conflicts: 62 shift/reduce, 25 reduce/reduce)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:32:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372605: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#372705: marked as done (kdelibs: FTBFS: no suitable 'operator delete')

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:32:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372559: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#363370: marked as done (xine-ui: printf missing-format-string bugs)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:33:01 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363370: fixed in xine-ui 0.99.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#372152: marked as done (g++-4.1: PR27935 appears to be unresolved (operator delete(void*, size_t) issue))

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:32:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372152: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#372705: marked as done (kdelibs: FTBFS: no suitable 'operator delete')

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:32:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372152: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#366562: FTBFS: unmet build-dependency libdvdread3-dev

tags 366562 + patch thanks Hi, the attached, trivial patch fixes this (and #359650 which is a similar bug). Bye diff -u drip-0.8.3.2+0.9.0-rc3/debian/control drip-0.8.3.2+0.9.0-rc3/debian/control --- drip-0.8.3.2+0.9.0-rc3/debian/control +++ drip-0.8.3.2+0.9.0-rc3/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@

Processed: Re: FTBFS: unmet build-dependency libdvdread3-dev

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 366562 + patch Bug#366562: FTBFS: unmet build-dependency libdvdread3-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrat

Processed: found 372844 in 1.1.10-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 372844 1.1.10-1 Bug#372844: speex: Missing dependency on libogg0 Bug marked as found in version 1.1.10-1. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administra

Processed: forgot to cc control...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 372933 + pending Bug#372933: aqbanking-tool: missing Depends: There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > # missing dependencies is RC > severity 372933 serious Bug#372933: aqbanking-tool: missing Depends: Severity set to `serious' from `importan

Bug#372700: euro-support-x depends on removed xfonts-base-transcoded

On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 10:53:29AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060611 23:47]: > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 09:42:28AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > this package depends on the removed xfonts-base-transcoded. > > > > BTW, this package did n

Processed: Re: drip: FTBFS: Cannot find -lXv

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 359650 + patch Bug#359650: drip: FTBFS: Cannot find -lXv There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#373090: FTBFS: must include stdint.h before any libdvdread headers

Package: drip Version: 0.8.3.2+0.9.0-rc3-7 Severity: grave Hi, the current version of drip as in sid FTBFS even after fixing #359650 and #366562. Below is the build output and attached is a patch that fixes this: > [...] > E64 -pthread -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-1.0 -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 > -I/us

Bug#359650: drip: FTBFS: Cannot find -lXv

tags 359650 + patch thanks Hi, the attached, trivial patch fixes this (and #366562 which is a similar bug). Bye diff -u drip-0.8.3.2+0.9.0-rc3/debian/control drip-0.8.3.2+0.9.0-rc3/debian/control --- drip-0.8.3.2+0.9.0-rc3/debian/control +++ drip-0.8.3.2+0.9.0-rc3/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@

Bug#372487: marked as done (python-numarray(-ext): Python-Version: syntax vs. pycentral)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:19:09 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line python-numarray(-ext): Python-Version: syntax has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 373090 + patch Bug#373090: FTBFS: must include stdint.h before any libdvdread headers There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

  1   2   >