Your message dated Tue, 23 May 2006 23:47:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368572: fixed in tulip 2.0.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
> Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 21 May 2006 10:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
> Von: Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Bug#368216: firefox: recent versions crash on sparc64
>
> Hi,
Hi Jurij
>
> I've prepared a fixed deb yesterday, it's available from
>
> Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 21 May 2006 10:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
> Von: Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Bug#368216: firefox: recent versions crash on sparc64
>
> Hi,
Hi Jurij
>
> I've prepared a fixed deb yesterday, it's available from
>
found 368572 2.0.4-2
thanks
Hello,
unfortunately, the problem is still there.
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
--
ENOSIG
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 368572 2.0.4-2
Bug#368572: tulip_2.0.4-1(amd64/unstable): error: cast from 'const
GraphObserver*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision
Bug marked as found in version 2.0.4-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
Package: apt-listchanges
Version: 2.59-0.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I try to use apt-listchanges it stops saying it can't import the
module apt_pkg :
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/apt-listchanges", line 30, in ?
import apt_pkg
I
severity 368695 normal
reassign 368695 python-apt
thanks
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 10:04:31AM +0200, bdepardon wrote:
> Package: apt-listchanges
> Version: 2.59-0.2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> When I try to use apt-listchanges it stops saying it can't import the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package knights
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: knights
> merge 366181 305832
Bug#305832: knights: 100% CPU loop with AI's: gnuchess, sjeng
Bug#366181: knights: Can't play against AI (gnuchess, sjeng, crafty)
Merged 305832 366181.
>
End of message, sto
Package: libct3
Version: 0.63-2
Severity: grave
Tags: l10n
Justification: renders package unusable
If the system locale is not set to "C", libct3 ignores the settings in
/etc/freetds/locale.conf. Respectively date and time values are returned
in a non standard way, compared to freetds installatio
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 368695 normal
Bug#368695: apt-listchanges: Problem with the module apt_pkg : "ImportError: No
module named apt_pkg"
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> reassign 368695 python-apt
Bug#368695: apt-listchanges: Problem with the module apt_pk
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2006 12:04:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368633: partman: LVM automatic partitioning not undoable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Package: anjuta
Version: 2.0.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After updating libgbf, project related plugins appear enabled but anjuta
still crashes trying to open a previous project OR create a new project
from existing sources. (Import Plugin still not activated, othe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 368707 normal
Bug#368707: anjuta: crash trying to create a project from existing sources
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
P
Package: bacula-sd
Version: 1.38.9-9
Severity: grave
bacula-sd segfaults in several locations with null pointer access (for
example #367424) if built with -O2.
I just took a look into src/stored/reserve.c at line 550, where I found
another occurance. At this point it uses foreach_alist, a macro w
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2006 05:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368451: fixed in udev 0.092-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2006 05:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368540: fixed in udev 0.092-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 368531 important
Bug#368531: RuntimeError: (111, 'Connection refused')
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2006 15:46:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2006 15:46:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 05:19:24PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> clone 368298 -1
> reopen -1
> reassign -1 ivtools-dev
> thanks
>
> On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:29:03AM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> > Package: x11-common
> > Version: 1:7.0.18
> > Severity: grave
...
> > dpkg: error processing
> > /
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2006 10:23:45 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug does not effect sid or etch
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 05:19:24PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> clone 368298 -1
> reopen -1
> reassign -1 ivtools-dev
> thanks
>
> On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:29:03AM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> > Package: x11-common
> > Version: 1:7.0.18
> > Severity: grave
...
> > dpkg: error processing
> > /
Package: libgtk-mozembed-ruby1.8
Version: 0.3.1-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi!
Since release -5 and new dependency against libxul-dev, package is not
working anymore..
I have a ruby application using it and allready packaged that I can give
if you want to
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 12:04 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:37:18PM -0700, ERIIX M. Blaike wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 21:54 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > Please tell us more about what you did.
>
> > 2: In the guided partitioning, choose "Erase entire disk a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # _That_ is the problem -- it specifically says the operation can be
> # undone when it cannot. The massage there was created before LVM was
> # included as a guided partitioning option and has not been changed to
> # reflect the new reality -- the ina
Your message dated Thu, 25 May 2006 01:28:07 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close #108093: klic: gcc 3.0 build failure
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On May 15, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These packages are not actually needed by udev, and again they may be
> unpacked in the wrong order. Next?
I am still waiting for your proposals.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
# _That_ is the problem -- it specifically says the operation can be
# undone when it cannot. The massage there was created before LVM was
# included as a guided partitioning option and has not been changed to
# reflect the new reality -- the inability to "undo the partitioning if
# you do not lik
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 07:26:26PM +0200, Rasmus Neckelmann wrote:
>> Some people report that the patch I've attached fixes the problem. I
>> can't verify it myself, so please excuse me if it still won't work. :)
> Hi,
>
> I got the same error on ppc, and after having
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2006 10:03:34 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368362: fixed in xmoto 0.1.14-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 368633 - moreinfo
Bug#368633: partman: LVM automatic partitioning not undoable
Tags were: patch moreinfo
Tags removed: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2006 10:32:23 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352926: fixed in prelink 0.0.20060522-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2006 10:02:50 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358460: fixed in exmap 0.8.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi Florian, hi security team, hi everyone else,
just for the record, sid has updated packages already.
I'm 70% into completing the security update for sarge. However, due to
the nature of the vulns, the patches are enormous, and thus require
meticulous porting and testing.
Unfortunately I will b
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2006 10:02:50 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358460: fixed in exmap 0.8.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Building it just now, it works fine. Can you get a more verbose failure
from the tests? Can other people test this?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 368720 important
forwarded 368720 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
merge 367424 368720
thanks
As far as I can tell, this is a dup of 367424. As you can see there, we
already narrowed down to the faulty configure test and I already
suggested __GNUC__.
Is your position that even with the correct __GNUC_
Will you consider fixing this in Sarge also? Users of stable don't
really want to lose all their ucf-managed conffiles when they purge the
mailman package.
$ sed -e ':/etc/mailman:!d' -e 's:^[0-9a-f]* *::' /var/lib/ucf/hashfile | grep
-v mailman | wc -l
14
--
Sam Morris
http://robots.org.uk/
P
The text in question is this:
This installer can guide you through partitioning a disk for use by
Debian, or if you prefer, you can do it manually. If you do choose to
use the guided partitioning tool, you will still have a chance later to
see the results, customise it, and even undo the parti
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 368633 partman-auto-lvm
Bug#368633: partman: LVM automatic partitioning not undoable
Bug reassigned from package `partman' to `partman-auto-lvm'.
> tags 368633 - moreinfo
Bu
Package: syslog-ng
Version: 1.9.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
I was looking through the buildd logs for syslog to see why it wasn't in
testing yet and I found the following in the ia64 build log:
yacc -d `test -f 'cfg-grammar.y' || echo './'`cfg-grammar.y
/bin
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2006 11:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363059: fixed in crystalcursors 1.1.1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 368720 grave
Bug#368720: bacula - alist breaks with undefined behaviour
Severity set to `grave' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2006 11:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368468: fixed in crystalcursors 1.1.1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
severity 368720 grave
thanks
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 01:23:52PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Is your position that even with the correct __GNUC__ test, that there is
> still a problem with foreach_alist?
It is undefined behaviour but works[tm] with gcc.
> If
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 01:39:01PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 10:01:33AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Le Mar 18 Avril 2006 05:43, Anand Kumria a écrit :
> > > tag 328825 - fixed
> > > tag 352251 - fixed
> > > tag 356330 - fixed
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > I'm reverti
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 08:49:36PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> severity 368720 grave
> thanks
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 01:23:52PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > Is your position that even with the correct __GNUC__ test, that there is
> > still a problem with foreach_alist?
>
> It is undefine
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 01:55:00PM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> > It is not possible to fix it. At least without the knowledge that it is
> > compiled with a c++ compiler.
> Aren't there CPP symbols (__cplusplus comes to mind) defined only when a c++
> compiler is running that could be used to de
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 02:39:33PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> it's easy to see how this would be confusing. I think the best thing would
> be for partman-auto-lvm to display the partman-lvm/confirm message before
> touching the disk here.
That's much better than my suggestion since it doesn't requi
severity 355887 normal
retitile 355887 typespeed segfault if $HOME is unset.
thanks
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 10:20:44PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> tags 355887 patch
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 12:08:07AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:05:00AM +0100, Malte Schir
> It is not possible to fix it. At least without the knowledge that it is
> compiled with a c++ compiler.
Aren't there CPP symbols (__cplusplus comes to mind) defined only when a c++
compiler is running that could be used to detect that a c++ compiler is
indeed running?
wt
--
Warren Turkal, Re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 363030 normal
Bug#363030: aegis: FTBFS with pbuilder on i386
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 328825 + fixed
Bug#328825: libosip2-dev: libosip2.pc is missing
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 352251 + fixed
Bug#352251: Link in description doesn't exist
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 356330 + fixed
Bug#356330:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 364259 + fixed
Bug#364259: xawtv: FTBFS
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUBSCR
severity 363030 normal
thanks
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 07:23:56AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I am able to reproduce this problem. Here are the root-related
> settings in /etc/pbuilderrc:
>
> > #for pbuilder debuild
> > BUILDSOURCEROOTCMD="fakeroot"
> > PBUILDERROOTCMD="sudo"
this i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 355352 serious
Bug#355352: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: extra qualification 'String::' on member 'equal'
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> severity 356116 serious
Bug#356116: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: extra qualifications
Severity set to `serious'
Hello,
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 07:18:25PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This RC bug has been open for a long time. I'll do an NMU of it soon,
> unless you object to it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Samuel.
>
No problem, thanks for the NMU. If you have commited your change to the
SVN it should be e
Package: libtktable
Version: 2.9-3
Severity: serious
libtktable calls a missing file in pkgIndex.tcl 'libTktable2.9.a' instead of
'libTktable2.9.so'.
I have the error :
couldn't load file "/usr/lib/Tktable2.9/libTktable2.9.a":
/usr/lib/Tktable2.9/libTktable2.9.a: cannot open shared object file:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 355887 normal
Bug#355887: typespeed can't be installed - same error like in #166096
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> retitile 355887 typespeed segfault if $HOME is unset.
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> thanks
Stop
tags 368681 moreinfo
stop
Hello,
I cannot reproduce what you are describing. Could you please elaborate ?
[creating a conflict manually]
% cvs up
RCS file: /home/staff/jd/test/toto/wqdwq,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
Merging differences between 1.1 and 1.2 into wqdwq
rcsmerge
- Forwarded message from -
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 06:54:46 -0700
To: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#361583: FTBFS: too few arguments to function 'gsl_cdf_pascal_Q'
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 368681 moreinfo
Bug#368681: cvs: does not flag conflicted copies anymore
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 296332 grave
Bug#296332: stratagus: just segfaults on amd64
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2006 16:51:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libfreetype6: jnethack: mkfontscale: segfaults on 64 bit
arches.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Hello,
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 12:33:59AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Package: mldonkey-server
> Version: 2.7.3-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Running /etc/init.d/mldonkey-server stop when the mldonkey-server is not
> running at the monent results in the script returning a non-zero exit
> code.
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 367986 xserver-xorg
Bug#367986: sylpheed-gtk1: ..moving mail between folders within Sg1-1.0.6,
crashes X.
Bug reassigned from package `sylpheed-gtk1' to `xserver-xorg'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
Your message dated Thu, 25 May 2006 09:09:40 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xipmsg: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: ldap-account-manager
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: critical
Tags: security
If I use the "Invalid Password" option in the "Unix" section of a user,
I get a password of *. This is not invalid. pam_ldap accepts the
password fine and allows the user to log in. Perhaps that means the
fault is wit
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2006 17:17:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300860: fixed in klic 3.003-gm1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
severity 340609 normal
thanks
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 06:19:16PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > # 340609
> > remove fai/2.10.1
> I'm not horribly impressed by the severity of this bug. Yeah, it would be
> nice to use a more appropriate FHS director
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2006 17:47:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368284: fixed in xipmsg 0.8088-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 340609 normal
Bug#340609: fai: /mnt2 not FHS compliant
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On May 15, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > These packages are not actually needed by udev, and again they may be
> > unpacked in the wrong order. Next?
i know that these packages are not needed by udev itself,
they are going to be installe
Package: libpam-ldap
Version: 180-1
Severity: critical
Tags: security
If I set the Shadow account expiration date in Shadow using LAM to
1-1-2003, I can still log in using libpam-ldap.
I am sure I tested this functionality out before and it worked, as such
I feel this bug is critical because it m
reassign 367986 xserver-xorg
thanks
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:50:23PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Sun, 21 May 2006 19:34:16 -0700, Steve wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 03:32:14AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > > On Sun, 21 May 2006 17:55:12 -0700, Steve
Dear Frank,
Great, thanks for your change, I'll upload it with applying your fix
after tests.
Thanks,
-- gotom
At Sun, 21 May 2006 01:56:58 -0500,
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>
> Package: xipmsg
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
>
> This is a policy violation now.
>
> Patch (despite changelog en
Hi Tim,
I'm having trouble at the moment getting GLX working on my amd64, so I can't
test this problem, but I'm told that foobillard works ok on amd64 with the
current ttf-freefont in unstable. Can you check whether you're still able
to reproduce this bug?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> severity 368699 important
Bug#368699: libct3: /etc/freetds/locales.conf ignored
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> severity 324869 important
Bug#324869: libct1: returns inval
On Wed, 24 May 2006 17:28:27 -0700, Steve wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> reassign 367986 xserver-xorg
> thanks
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:50:23PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 May 2006 19:34:16 -0700, Steve wrote in message
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > On Mon, May
Package: stratagus
Version: 2.1-9
Followup-For: Bug #296332
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In src/movie/vp31/FrameIni.c there is a macro:
#define ROUNDUP32(X) ( ( ( (unsigned long) X ) + 31 )&( 0xFFE0 ) )
which is, I guess, supposed to enforce some sort of alignment. Probably
Your message dated Thu, 25 May 2006 11:25:00 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ignores LDAP account expiration details
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2006 23:14:01 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #368582,
regarding hardinfo - FTBFS: error: arch/this/alsa.h: No such file or directory
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 25 May 2006 03:27:30 +0200, Arnt wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 24 May 2006 17:28:27 -0700, Steve wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > reassign 367986 xserver-xorg
> > thanks
> >
> > On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:50:23PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2
Package: rafkill
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
The rafkill package is failing to build on those architectures whose
autobuilders use sudo as rootcmd (alpha/mips/mipsel), because the clean
target is apparently not clean:
[...]
scons prefix=install bin=bin
scons: Reading SConscript files ...
U
Hi, is it possible to confirm that this is a 1.5 regression, and that
the issue didn't exist in 1.4?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 04:17:02AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > > Well, if xrestop doesn't show any unusual memory usage, how about
> > > just 'top'?
> > ..aye, did that too, and it showed xrestop loading up. Running
> > sylpheed-gtk1 remotely, I see no problems and even up 18fps in
> > a Fli
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 181494 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#181494: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL1.1olisfcbc] includes non-free documentation
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental sid sarge-ignore
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Package: stratagus
Version: 2.1-9.1
Followup-For: Bug #296332
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I rebuilt without nostrip,noopt and now it seems to work fine w/o
crashing (with the patch I sent applied). Maybe I missed a broken printf
somewhere
Anyway, if you conditionalize my al
On Wed, 24 May 2006 20:11:09 -0700, Steve wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 04:17:02AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > > > Well, if xrestop doesn't show any unusual memory usage, how
> > > > about just 'top'?
>
> > > ..aye, did that too, and it showed xrestop loading
Package: pine
Version: 4.62-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
It should have binary .deb package for the original pine, so that it can
be redistributed in debian ftp archive. The package name may be
"pine-orig", for example.
Without binary package, users will don't know t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> severity 368816 wishlist
Bug#368816: pine: should have another binary package which have no debian patch
Severity set to `wishlist' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2006 23:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#188913: fixed in psys 1.56-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2006 23:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#196275: fixed in psys 1.56-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2006 23:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347106: fixed in psys 1.56-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
94 matches
Mail list logo
