Bug#365623: Undeclared conflicts: pathname conflict at usr/share/man/man4/ipfw.4.gz between freebsd-manpages, ipchains

freebsd-manpages maintainer: Do you think it would be possible to remove that manpage from your package? I do not want our packages conflict (it does not do the same task), and it would be pointless to use the alternatives system for manpages. If it's possible, please remove the manpage from freeb

Bug#365698: pan_0.95-2(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: missing b-d on dpatch

Package: pan Version: 0.95-2 Severity: serious Hi, your package fails to build from source since it is missing a build-dependency on dpatch. | Automatic build of pan_0.95-2 on odin by sbuild/sparc 79 | Build started at 20060502-0837

Bug#365699: kdewebdev: kommander-dev references now gone libXrender.la; package not binnmu-safe: quanta

Package: kdewebdev Version: 4:3.5.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable as subject says; it needs a new upload. kommander-dev references libXrender.la binNMU cannot be scheduled, as there are a too strict depend on quanta <>quanta-data. /Sune -- System Information: Debia

Bug#361384: marked as done (libdspam7-drv-pgsql: unattended installation fails)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 00:32:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#361384: fixed in dspam 3.6.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#364005: marked as done (libdspam-drv-mysql fails to install)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 00:32:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#364005: fixed in dspam 3.6.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365566: marked as done (libpalm-perl: No code in package (only documentation))

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 00:32:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365566: fixed in libpalm-perl 1.3.0-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#365623: Undeclared conflicts: pathname conflict at usr/share/man/man4/ipfw.4.gz between freebsd-manpages, ipchains

freebsd-manpages maintainer: Do you think it would be possible to remove that manpage from your package? I do not want our packages conflict (it does not do the same task), and it would be pointless to use the alternatives system for manpages. If it's possible, please remove the manpage from freeb

Bug#365623: ipchains

i don't see a problem with conflicting to it. current sid doesn't support 2.2 or 2.4 linux kernels anymore. not sure about etch. who is still using ipchains, i didn't check popcon. what's the problem with a conflicts for you? yours, guerkan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Processed: Re: Bug#365693: xserver-xorg: I got an error code 10 when making apt-get upgrade

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xserver-xorg Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xserver-xorg > severity 365693 grave Bug#365693: xserver-xorg: I got an error code 10 when making apt-get upgrade Severity set to `grave'. > merge 365693 365282 Bug#365282: xserver-xorg 7.0.15 fails

Processed: Fixed in upload of pan 0.95-3 to experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 365698 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#365698: pan_0.95-2(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: missing b-d on dpatch There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bu

Bug#365714: emacs21: FTBFS on most architectures, xaw issues.

Package: emacs21 Version: 21.4a-1 Severity: serious Hold on, this is a multistep bugreport which covers a couple of issues and *might* finally boil down to xaw3dg-dev and/or libxaw. According to http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=emacs21, building of emacs after the last NMU failed on m

Bug#361995: marked as done (evolution: Creating new address book creates only an alias, but deleting deletes the original folder)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 03:17:23 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#361995: fixed in evolution 2.6.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#353881: marked as done (evolution: Cannot remove task lists plus existing lists do not function)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 03:17:23 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#361995: fixed in evolution 2.6.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#365629: cyrus-common-2.2 version 2.2.13-1 0: cyrdeliver segfaults

Michael Holtermann wrote on 01/05/2006 18:06: > With current version 2.2.13-1 of cyrus-common-2.2 a non-working > cyrdeliver will be installed. > > If called from command line > # cyrdeliver -m user.micha > Segmentation fault > > will occur. I was able to reproduce the error, producing a core du

Bug#365722: tiff: FTBFS with new X packages: Fails to detect glut

Package: tiff Version: 3.8.2-1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... checking for X... libraries , headers in standard search path ... checking for OpenGL Utility library... -lGLU checking for GLUT library... no configure: creating ./config.status ... dh_installudev -plibtiff-opengl d

Bug#365598: gdm: after upgrade, GTK+ refuses to initialize

The problem is the line NEVER_FAILS_root_set_euid_egid (0, 0); in the "sanitize .ICEauthority ..." block in daemon/slave.c ~line 3500. Later on (line 3557) only the process's uid is setuid to the user's uid, while the gid stays unchanged (and hence fails the setgid check in the first GTK app

Bug#365535: marked as done (CVE-2006-1895: code injection vulnerability in includes/template.php)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 13:46:56 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365535: CVE-2006-1895: code injection vulnerability in includes/template.php has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#365729: mount fails on unmountable filesystem despite 'noauto'

Package: mount Version: 2.12r-8 Severity: serious I have an LVM2 partition on a machine that dual-boots into 2.4 and 2.6 (to use certain ISDN drivers). Hence this partition is unusable under 2.4 kernels; I have the following /etc/fstab entry: /dev/srv_vg/lvol0 /srv/public ext3noauto 0

Bug#315784: md5sum shouldn't be able to disappear

Nicolas François <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > After reading the log of #315784 (dpkg: dependencies should ensure md5sum > is present), I wonder why adding a > Pre-Depends: coreutils (>= ...) > field to dpkg would break (c)debootstrap. > > I made a tarball for debootstrap with a

Bug#364231: [parisc-linux] Re: Bug#364231: exception catching

[should we drop parisc-linux?] John David Anglin writes: > > Er, no; we're talking about official Debian packages here, and the > > libstdc++.so.6 in Debian is now from gcc-4.1. The problem is precisely that > > GMP *is* being built using gcc-4.0, but libstdc++ is from gcc-4.1, resulting > > in t

Bug#365547: manpages-dev should use dpkg-divert to solve conflicting files with glibc-doc

Package: manpages-dev Version: 2.28-1 Followup-For: Bug #365547 I managed to install manpages-dev by doing this: dpkg-divert --package manpages-dev --rename /usr/share/man/man3/sem_destroy.3. dpkg-divert --package manpages-dev --rename /usr/share/man/man3/sem_getvalue.3.gz dpkg-divert --package m

Bug#362852: marked as done (Undeclared conflicts: pathname conflict at usr/share/man/man8/sendmail.8.gz between hula-mta, exim4-base)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 05:32:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#362852: fixed in exim4 4.62-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365184: marked as done (editobj: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 05:47:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365184: fixed in editobj 0.5.7-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#365467: marked as done (exim4-base: Depends on priority optional package (libdb4.2) but is priority standard itself)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 05:32:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365467: fixed in exim4 4.62-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: merging 365597 365714

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > merge 365597 365714 Bug#365597: emacs21: FTBFS: X11/Xaw/Paned.h: No such file or directory Bug#365714: emacs21: FTBFS on most architectures, xaw issues. Merged 365597 365714. > End o

Bug#365740: nautilus: fails to start due to undefined symbol

Package: nautilus Version: 2.14.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable nautilus doesn't declare a dependency on libnautilus-extension1, and if you use 2.14.1 with older (2.12.x) libnautilus-extension1, it fails to start with the following error from ~/.xsession-errors: nautil

Bug#346695: Intend to NMU ivtools

Hi, I've just taken the time to fix the outstanding ivtools RC bugs and do the library renaming. The patch is attached, NMU will follow in a minute. Thanks to Amaya and Agustin for preparing the initial patch. Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/ debdiff ivtools_1.1.3-5.dsc /sr

Processed: Re: Bug#362170: Good backtrace for bus error on sparc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 362170 http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36146#c44 Bug#362170: firefox fails to start with bus error on sparc64 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36146#c44. > tag 362170

Bug#365282: applying the patch

Hi, as mentionned above, the problem involves the xserver-xorg.config.in script. it affects upgrade and new install procedure of the xserver-xorg package (and of course all of the package (including x-window-system) depending on it). I suggest you applying the patch from Steven Brown (Thank

Bug#365722: marked as done (tiff: FTBFS with new X packages: Fails to detect glut)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 07:32:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365722: fixed in tiff 3.8.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365174: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D

Yep, will move it to non-free with the next upload.. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "un

Bug#362170: Good backtrace for bus error on sparc

forwarded 362170 http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36146#c44 tag 362170 upstream thanks On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:34:40PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote: > Hi, > > By installing firefox-dbg package, I was able to obtain the attached > backtrace for the bus error problem. According to it, t

Bug#365623: File conflicts

BTW, you should check for other file conflicts: $ zgrep freebsd-manpages, Contents-i386.gz usr/share/man/man4/ipfw.4.gz doc/freebsd-manpages,net/ipchains usr/share/man/man4/opie.4.gz doc/freebsd-manpages,admin/opie-client usr/share/man/man9/atomic_add.9.gz doc/freebsd-manpages,doc/linux-manual-2.

Bug#365623: ipchains

On 5/2/06, Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Therefore, one might need both packages to be installed. Please remove > your version of the manpage, or mail me. i think someone who installs freebsd-manpages usually does it on debian gnu/kfreebsd (where ipchains won't ever be ported to).

Bug#364231: [parisc-linux] Re: Bug#364231: exception catching

> Ok, coming back to the question of the system compiler on hppa for > etch. Assuming that hppa does want to do that: > > - is glibc buildable with gcc-4.1 on hppa? As far as I know, there's no new problems using 4.1 instead of 4.0. See http://lists.parisc-linux.org/pipermail/parisc-linux/2006-A

Bug#362170: Good backtrace for bus error on sparc

forwarded 362170 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161826 thanks On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:06:11AM -0400, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (...) > > 5102 while (aNumChars-- > 0) { > > 5103// XXX: If you crash here then you may see the issue described > > 5104// in htt

Processed: Re: Bug#362170: Good backtrace for bus error on sparc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 362170 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161826 Bug#362170: firefox fails to start with bus error on sparc64 Forwarded-to-address changed from http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36146#c44 to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/s

Bug#365748: dvbstream_0.6+cvs20060501-1(unstable/sparc/spontini): missing build-depends

Package: dvbstream Version: 0.6+cvs20060501-1 Severity: serious You appear to be missing a build-depends on dbs. | Automatic build of dvbstream_0.6+cvs20060501-1 on spontini by sbuild/sparc 85 | Build started at 20060502-0745

Bug#339240: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 08:46:38 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339240: fixed in opencv 0.9.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processed: Fixed in upload of glibc 2.3.999.1-1 to experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 181494 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#181494: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL1.1olisfcbc] includes non-free documentation Tags were: sarge-ignore Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian b

Bug#365746: FTBFS: misses dependency on: dbs

/rules:16: /usr/share/dbs/dbs-build.mk: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/dbs/dbs-build.mk'. Stop. ** Build finished at 20060502-1639 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Henc

Processed: Re: Bug#365680: cgiirc: buffer overflow in client.c

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package cgiirc Ignoring bugs not assigned to: cgiirc > tags 365680 + confirmed Bug#365680: cgiirc: buffer overflow in client.c Tags were: security Tags added: confirmed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Deb

Bug#348729: please recheck with zeroconf 0.8

Tested zeroconf 0.9-1: I had to first uninstall network-manager (which does not use if-up.d and friends...), and re-enable laptop-net. That all worked. Now, trying again I have the same symptoms as before: I get two IP addresses. I can ping hosts on the same hub, or outside our network. Hosts on

Bug#365680: cgiirc: buffer overflow in client.c

package cgiirc tags 365680 + confirmed thanks On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:15:37AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: [...] > Upstream has just released 0.5.8, which fixes a buffer overflow in > client.c amongst other things. The 0.5.8 timeline can be seen here: [...] Okay, I can confirm the buffer overflow.

Bug#361143: marked as done (apt-show-versions: Invocation fails with Perl errors)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 09:29:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360895: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#361904: marked as done (Failed to load application: libstdc++.so.6: cannot handle TLS data)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 09:29:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#361904: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#361221: marked as done (apt: traceback with "ImportError: libstdc++.so.6: cannot handle TLS data")

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 09:29:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360895: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#360776: marked as done (apt-show-versions: cron.daily fails noisily)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 09:29:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360895: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#364041: marked as done (bugsx: uninstallable, FTBFS with Xorg 7.0)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 09:27:40 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#364041: fixed in bugsx 1.08-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#360895: marked as done (ImportError: libstdc++.so.6: cannot handle TLS data)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 09:29:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360895: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#365750: gnus doesn't start

Package: gnus Version: 5.11+v0.4.dfsg-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.3 Loca

Bug#361024: marked as done (libstdc++6: cannot handle TLS data)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 09:29:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360895: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#363107: marked as done (apt-listchanges: Fails with an error about TLS data)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 09:29:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360895: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#365598: gdm: after upgrade, GTK+ refuses to initialize

Hi, I was pointed at: If someone wants to check it solves the issue, it would help the package maintainer to decide whether to include the patch or not. (I don't have the bug.) Bye

Bug#365680: cgiirc: buffer overflow in client.c

Hi, On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:15:37AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Upstream has just released 0.5.8, which fixes a buffer overflow in > client.c amongst other things. The 0.5.8 timeline can be seen here: Just as a short-term reply and for documentation reasons regarding this issue: The Debian packa

Processed: Fixed in upload of coq-doc 8.0pl3+8.1alpha-1 to experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 266019 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#266019: coq-doc: please split into doc-html and doc-ps There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > tag 294865 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#294865: coq-doc: The documentation for coq is non-free (thi

Processed: Re: Bug#365688: auctex emacs21 incompatible => auctex to be removed

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 365688 emacs21 is uninstallable Bug#365688: auctex emacs21 incompatible => auctex to be removed Changed Bug title. > reassign 365688 emacs21 Bug#365688: emacs21 is uninstallable Bug reassigned from package `auctex' to `emacs21'. > severity 365

Bug#193787: hanging out with you

Hi, Hope I am not writing to wrong address. I am nice, pretty looking girl. I am plabnning on visiting your town this month. Can we meet each other in person? Message me back at [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

Bug#359297: marked as done (openoffice.org-writer: Old openoffice.org-gnome crashes writer on startup)

Your message dated Tue, 2 May 2006 19:23:50 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#358470: marked as done (mathwar: Entry not in GNOME 2.12 Foot menu)] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#365680: I have requested a CVE assignment

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have requested a CVE assignment for this vulnerability, and will send it on as soon as it is obtained. Please include this reference in any changelog resolving this issue so that it can be appropriately tracked. >> There is no CVE assigned yet as f

Bug#365752: FTBFS on AMD64: missing SSE2 header

Package: opencv Severity: serious opencv_0.9.7-1 seems to miss #include for AMD64 inside opencv-0.9.7/cxcore/include/cxtypes.h. In fact, it FTBFS while compiling the first file, as shown: if /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I. -I../../cxcore/inc

Bug#358570: marked as done (openoffice.org: signal 11 on startup)

Your message dated Tue, 2 May 2006 19:23:50 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#358470: marked as done (mathwar: Entry not in GNOME 2.12 Foot menu)] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#365115: mkcfm removed

I read on bug 362296: > Last but not least mkcfm had been drooped out of xutils because it's > non-free. cid_term() tries to call mkcfm and will fail doing so with > with recent versions of xutils. Is the solution to rewrite mkcfm, thus to provide a drop-in free replacement? Or is the way mkcfm

Bug#360548: marked as done (openoffice.org: Openoffice crashes on startup)

Your message dated Tue, 2 May 2006 19:23:50 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#358470: marked as done (mathwar: Entry not in GNOME 2.12 Foot menu)] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#364339: marked as done (Some files (test/*, form/fty_*) in ncurses are not copyrighted properly/sanely)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 10:15:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#364339: fixed in ncurses 5.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#350624: star: acceptance of CDDL is undecided

> Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You are neither the submitter of the bug nor the package's maintainer. > > Please read hmm, somehow the above (quoted) mail reached Joerg Schilling, but not the BTS. I give it here for reference (with control messages removed):

Bug#365729: mount fails on unmountable filesystem despite 'noauto'

Hi, On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:03:40PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > /dev/srv_vg/lvol0 /srv/public ext3noauto 0 2 > > This should cause mount not to attempt to mount it on boot, leaving the > user (root) free to mount. Unfortunately, it does not, and I have to are you sure it

Bug#365714: emacs21: FTBFS on most architectures, xaw issues.

On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:48:07AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > As to the actual failure, it doesn't look as if it should be related to > the NMU patch, and this is some other strange thing. On i386, it fails > with > > i486-linux-gnu-gcc -c -DUSE_LUCID -Demacs -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DUSE_LUCID -I.

Bug#365353: missing debconf template: xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/zaxismapping

On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:08:35PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 12:44:01AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 08:40:03AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > Quoting Adam Borowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > The debconf question xserver-xorg/config/i

Processed: Fixed in upload of mambo 4.5.3h-1 to experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 326827 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#326827: mambo: postrm must call ucf --purge on purge Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > tag 326828 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#326828: mambo: configuration.php should start with tag 34406

Bug#355457: marked as done (fetchmail uses /var/lib/fetchmail rather than /var/run for pid file)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 11:32:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355457: fixed in fetchmail 6.3.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#364434: marked as done (gwget2: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat `debian/gwget/usr/lib/epiphany': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 11:32:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#364434: fixed in gwget2 0.97-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#194248: let's meet

Hi there lovely, I was searching the net few days ago. I am new to this thing. and saw your profile. I decidbed to email you acause I found you attractive. I might come down to your city in few weeks. Let me knoaw if we can meet each bother in person. I am attractiave girl. I am sure you won't reg

Processed: setting package to kdewebdev kdewebdev-dbg kdewebdev-doc-html kfilereplace kimagemapeditor klinkstatus kommander kommander-dev kxsldbg quanta quanta-data ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > package kdewebdev kdewebdev-dbg kdewebdev-doc-html kfilereplace > kimagemapeditor klinkstatus kommander kommander-dev kxsldbg quanta quanta-data Ignoring bugs not assigned to: klinks

Bug#365598: gdm: after upgrade, GTK+ refuses to initialize

* Loïc Minier: > I was pointed at: > > > > If someone wants to check it solves the issue, it would help the > package maintainer to decide whether to include the patch or not. (I > don't have

Processed: Re: Bug#365755: installation fails

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xserver-xorg Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xserver-xorg > severity 365755 grave Bug#365755: installation fails Severity set to `grave'. > merge 365755 365282 Bug#365282: xserver-xorg 7.0.15 fails installation (pre-inst exit status 10) Bug#365

Bug#365598: gdm: after upgrade, GTK+ refuses to initialize

Package: gdm Version: 2.14.4-1 Followup-For: Bug #365598 I've the problem on my computer, and here is some comment : - you don't have the bug if use-ssh-agent is selected in /etc/X11/Xsession.options, so it may be why there is no bug on the maintainer's computer (probably ssh-agent to drop the

Bug#365680: It does affect all installs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mario: It does affect all configurations, just because the configuration file says client-perl.cgi it doesn't stop someone accessing client.cgi as the package builds client.cgi and puts it into the cgi-bin directory. David -BEGIN PGP SIGNA

Processed: tagging 365598

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > tags 365598 + patch Bug#365598: gdm: after upgrade, GTK+ refuses to initialize There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact m

Bug#365640: Acknowledgement (gnome-session segfault)

Sorry, It seem that is was a prelink problem on my computer. Work well now. To be closed. Regards, Emmanuel. Accédez au courrier électronique de La Poste : www.laposte.net ; 3615 LAPOSTENET (0,34 €/mn) ; tél : 08 92 68 13 50 (0,34€/mn)

Bug#365770: [inux-image-2.6.16-1-686] Kernel panic after update

Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686 Version: 2.6.16-10 Severity: grave After updating the linux-image (from 2.6.16-8 ?) on one of my systems (PIII 700) the system do not boot anymore (rescue kernel still works), and stops with a kernel panic message. Sorry, I haven´t more information, I´ve no info

Bug#365680: It does affect all installs

On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:46:28PM +0100, David Leadbeater wrote: > Mario: It does affect all configurations, just because the > configuration file says client-perl.cgi it doesn't stop someone > accessing client.cgi as the package builds client.cgi and puts it Yes, i missed that in the first

Processed: Serious bug, not normal (I know fixed, but should be properly set in BTS)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 365561 serious Bug#365561: libwxbase2.6-0: installation overwrites file from libwxgtk2.6-0 Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admi

Bug#364729: Intend to NMU

tags 364729 + patch pending stop Hi, On Tue, Apr 25, 2006, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > gnutls12 builds libgnutls-dev and gnutls-bin, which are now also > provided by gnutls13. gnutls12 got scheduled a number of binNMUs for > the libtasn1-3 transition. This doesn't work now anymore, bec

Bug#365629: cyrus-common-2.2 version 2.2.13-1 0: cyrdeliver segfaults

tags 365629 +pending thanks Sven Mueller wrote: > So for some unknown reason, res1 is a NULL pointer. I would be glad if > someone else from the packaging team could help me here. I'm deeply > covered with (paid) work, so I can't investigate any further for a while. > > Regards, > Sven > > > > ___

Processed: Re: Bug#365629: cyrus-common-2.2 version 2.2.13-1 0: cyrdeliver segfaults

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 365629 +pending Bug#365629: cyrus-common-2.2 version 2.2.13-1 0: cyrdeliver segfaults There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrat

Processed: Intend to NMU

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 364729 + patch pending Bug#364729: Should stop building libgnutls-dev and gnutls-bin There were no tags set. Tags added: patch, pending > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adminis

Bug#365680: Patch for 0.5.4-6

Hi, The appended patch should fix this issue. It's based on the upstream patches in 0.5.8. This is the result of Mario already reviewing it. Everybody else is invited to review it too. To create a new package: - Place the .dpatch in debian/patches - Add 50_client-c_bufferoverflow_fix.dpatch t

Bug#365640: marked as done (gnome-session segfault)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 23:08:50 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365640: Acknowledgement (gnome-session segfault) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Processed: tagging 356055

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 356055 + upstream Bug#356055: loadlin: loadlin.exe cannot be built from source There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administ

Bug#258293: marked as done (FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on xmms-dev)

Your message dated Tue, 2 May 2006 23:34:18 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#365176: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D

Simon, > It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: > > usr/share/doc/libpt-doc/samples/xmpptest/draft-ietf-xmpp-core-22.txt.gz > usr/share/doc/libpt-doc/samples/xmpptest/draft-ietf-xmpp-im-21.txt.gz this was addressed upstream and will be resolved with the next update of the Phobos relea

Bug#365778: xviewg: Can't install

Package: xviewg Version: 3.2p1.4-21 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable xviewg can't be installed. apt-get output: $ apt-get -sV install xviewg Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable

Bug#365746: marked as done (FTBFS: misses dependency on: dbs)

x27;. Stop. ** Build finished at 20060502-1639 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Hence, it misses usr/share/dbs/dbs-build.mk, which is shipped with dbs pacakged. Adding it to the dependencies should solve the issue. Thanks, Roberto -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefe

Bug#283049: marked as done (unalz_0.21(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 14:18:52 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#283049: fixed in unalz 0.55-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365748: marked as done (dvbstream_0.6+cvs20060501-1(unstable/sparc/spontini): missing build-depends)

ted at 20060502-0745 | ** [...] | ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: | Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 5.0.0), linux-kernel-headers [...] | /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean | debian/rules:16: /usr/s

Bug#365166: marked as done (libmusclecard: FTBFS: Undefined references to log_msg)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 14:18:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365166: fixed in libmusclecard 1.3.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#365680: I have requested a CVE assignment

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 CVE-2006-2148 was assigned for this vulnerability. Micah micah wrote: > > I have requested a CVE assignment for this vulnerability, and will send > it on as soon as it is obtained. Please include this reference in any > changelog resolving this iss

Bug#365714: XOrg transition, status of libxaw8

clone 365714 -1 reassign -1 xaw3dg-dev retitle -1 Depends on libxaw8-dev and breaks building packages thanks Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> My question is now whether to switch away from libxaw8 is a wishlist >> issue or in fact a fixed plan? What's the appropriate severity for >>

Bug#365780: gcc-4.1: FTBFS on amd64, sparc with "configure.in:2177: error: possibly undefined macro: AS_FOR_TARGET"

Package: gcc-4.1 Version: 4.1.0-2 Severity: serious The patch ada-link-lib.dpatch changes the top-level configure.in, then calls autoconf to regenerate configure. Autoconf then bails out with: configure.in:2177: error: possibly undefined macro: AS_FOR_TARGET If this token and others are le

  1   2   >