Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 346896 + fixed
Bug#346896: toshutils: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
The dependency can just be removed. Will need to synchronize sid and
experimental, and upload soon.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: kernel-package
Version: 10.030
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'kernel-package' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at kernel/pkg/image/preinst line 20.
make[1]: [check] Error 2 (ignored)
perl -wc kernel/pkg/image/postins
Package: libapache-mod-ssl
Version: 2.8.22-1sarge1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
My apache with ssl setup doesn't work:
I have set up libapache-mod-ssl on a different machine with an almost
identical configuration and there it works. Setting it up on a second
machine d
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:59:21AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Michael Vogt [Thu, 05 Jan 2006 23:27:40 +0100]:
> > but we need a better system for upgrades (see below).
>
> Thanks for proposing this.
>
> > I think the same. My proposal is to create a new debain-server-keyring
>
> Can I s
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 01:13:57PM -0800, Mark Hedges wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 09:28:24AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > > Michael Vogt wrote:
> > > > You can run apt-get with "--allow-unauthenticated" or
> > > > APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated=true in apt.conf
> > >
> > > Thanx for the h
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 1.0.2+20021025-7
Severity: grave
Hello,
I cannot install tetex-extra because its preinst shows weird md5sum
problems (see below). I have been told that may be caused by obsolete coreutils,
however this is a up-to-date Sid system (installed with Slink or so and
dist-u
severity 346326 normal
retitle 346326 Add check for correct setting of TEXMF
reassign 346326 tex-common
thanks
Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There is no mention of /usr/share/texmf-tetex at all here.
>
> Thanks. I've got the hint. It was the old problem, that I update the
> config aft
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 346326 normal
Bug#346326: tetex-bin: postinst fails -- dvips35.map not found
Severity set to `normal'.
> retitle 346326 Add check for correct setting of TEXMF
Bug#346326: tetex-bin: postinst fails -- dvips35.map not found
Changed Bug title.
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> # doesn't seem to be affecting anyone else, no reason to think the package
> is unusable
> severity 347351 important
Bug#347351: libapache-mod-ssl: apache doesn't enable ssl, mod_ss
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:34:54 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Package: libxml
Severity: serious
Version: 1:1.8.17-10
>From my pbuilder build log:
...
-> Considering libreadline4-dev
-> Trying libreadline4-dev
-> Cannot install libreadline4-dev; apt errors follow:
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Package libreadline4-dev is no
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:47:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344765: fixed in kdeedu 4:3.5.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: dwww
Severity: serious
Version: 1.9.26
Tags: patch
>From my pbuilder build log:
...
perl -e ' \
use lib ".";\
use Debian::Dwww::Initialize; \
$d=&DwwwInitialize;
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # According to bug submitter, this bug only affects sarge.
> tag 345168 sarge
Bug#345168: Sarge version of nscd is completely broken (Fails to cache any
entry)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contac
Package: ttf-freefont
Version: 20051206-2
Followup-For: Bug #254113
Maybe just a configuration issue, but 20051206-2 does not fix the extra
space issue, reintrocuded in 20051206-1, on my system.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'un
For reference, here is the corresponding build log for the HPPA
architecture [1]:
[...]
checking for gssapi.h... yes
checking gssapi/gssapi_generic.h usability... no
checking gssapi/gssapi_generic.h presence... no
checking for gssapi/gssapi_generic.h... no
checking gssapi/gssapi.h usability... no
severity 347355 important
found 347355 3.0-11
stop
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: tetex-extra
> Version: 1.0.2+20021025-7
> Severity: grave
>
> Hello,
>
> I cannot install tetex-extra because its preinst shows weird md5sum
> problems (see below). I have been told that may be c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package netatalk
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: netatalk
> # This seems to me to be a bug in Heimdal, rather than Netatalk. See the
> # bug report and comments. If I am wrong, please reassign this back to
> # netatalk.
> reassign 346346 heimdal-dev 0.7
Re: Adeodato Simó in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
> build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
> no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
> source.
Hi, here's the diff for the NMU
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 02:47:22 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346618: fixed in jnethack 1.1.5-19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 02:47:44 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346810: fixed in xengine 1.11-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 02:47:43 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346811: fixed in xeji 1.2-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 02:47:46 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346814: fixed in xfireworks 1.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: kismet
Version: 2005.08.R1-1.2
Severity: grave
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
kismet: Depends: libdps1 (> 4.1.0) but it is not installable
E: Broken packages
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:02:36 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346839: fixed in xtokkaetama 1.0b-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:03:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line avahi-discover: depends on wrong libavahi-common
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:02:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346931: fixed in xjokes 1.0-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:02:33 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346994: fixed in xshodo 2.0-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
It would be better avoiding
completely to upset user configuration in that way IMHO.
I agree that it would be nice -- but it's impossible. :/ Anyway, this
configuration modification is only done on the administrator's request
(lm-syslog-setup), so he must have a
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:26:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kball: not installable in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:32:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346841: fixed in xtranslate 0.2-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:44:05AM -0330, Lawrence Williams wrote:
> Thank you for the report Mr. Simo. I can do a new release if I can find a
> sponsor. Would you be willing to help?
FWIW, I have a standing offer of sponsorship for any packages that fix RC
bugs, as long as the packages pass my
* Lawrence Williams [Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:44:05 -0330]:
> Hello,
Hi,
> Thank you for the report Mr. Simo. I can do a new release if I can find a
> sponsor. Would you be willing to help?
In case of RC bugs, it's easy to find sponsors. I recommend that you
produce a new version, and mention t
Package: bricolage
Version: 1.8.8-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-k7
Local
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:17:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346396: fixed in floatbg 1.0-23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:17:19 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346404: fixed in xjig 2.4-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:17:16 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347114: fixed in wmcliphist 0.6-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:17:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347135: fixed in mlterm 2.9.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: serious
Hi
Please remove this package because the provided binary now
exists in kdeedu from kde 3.5 which is now in unstable.
Greetings
Steffen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Archit
--
Victor Seva
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.torreviejawireless.org
http://linuxmaniac.homeip.net
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key ID: 0xDD12F253
Socio numero 78 de ANURI
diff -ruN xawtv-3.94/debian/changelog xawtv-3.94-nmu/debian/changelog
--- xawtv-3.94/debian/changelog 2006-01-10 13:42:49.
Package: guile-gtk
Version: 1.2_0.31-4
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
your package fails to build on m68k and ia64, since you specify a (no
longer) existing/used compiler:
Automatic build of guile-gtk-1.2_0.31-4 on tanda by sbuild/m68k 79
[...]
** Using build de
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> tags 320351 patch
Bug#320351: Dependency (kernel-patch-acl) about to be removed from the archive
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Hi there!
I just can't resist the urge... Could Amaya NMU amaya? :)
Please, pretty, pretty please!
Only change I would make, if pbuilder were happy about it, would be to
replace xlibs-dev for
~/xlibs-transition/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>./xlibs-split ../amaya-9.2.1/
Your code seems to depend on the foll
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> severity 329316 serious
Bug#329316: nvidia-kernel-source: Fails to build from nvidia-kernel-source
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> package ftp.debian.org
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ftp.debian.org
> severity 347381 normal
Bug#347381: RM: kgeography -- geography learning tool
Severity set to `normal'.
> retit
Package: drip
Version: 0.8.3.2+0.9.0-rc3-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
with xorg 6.9 libdps1 has been removed from sid and therefore drip is
uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (100, 'unstab
Package: dx
Version: 1:4.3.2-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
with xorg 6.9 libdps1 has been removed from sid and therefore dx is
uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'ex
Package: imview
Version: 1.1.8-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
with xorg 6.9 libdps1 has been removed from sid and therefore imview
is uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (9
Package: k3d
Version: 0.5.0.35-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
with xorg 6.9 libdps1 has been removed from sid and therefore k3d is
uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99,
Package: kword
Version: 1:1.4.2-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
with xorg 6.9 libdps1 has been removed from sid and therefore kword
and several other packages from koffice are uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers uns
Package: librmagick-ruby1.8
Version: 1.9.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
with xorg 6.9 libdps1 has been removed from sid and therefore
librmagick-ruby1.8 is uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT polic
Package: nip2
Version: 7.10.16-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
with xorg 6.9 libdps1 has been removed from sid and therefore drip is
uninstallable. Same thing with vips packages:
libvips-tools libvips10-dev libvips10c2a
-- System Information:
Debian Release: t
Package: rss-glx
Version: 0.8.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
with xorg 6.9 libdps1 has been removed from sid and therefore rss-glx
is uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (100, 'unstable'),
Package: tclmagick
Version: 0.45-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
with xorg 6.9 libdps1 has been removed from sid and therefore
tclmagick is uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (100, 'unstable'
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:32:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346748: fixed in icewm 1.2.23-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: gsfonts-x11
Version: 0.17
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
>From my pbuilder build log:
...
perl -e 'my $lines=""; my $count=0; \
while (<>) { \
next if /^\d+$/; \
$lines.=$_; $count++; \
if(/iso8859-1/) { \
Package: python-libavg
Version: 0.2.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
with xorg 6.9 libdps1 has been removed from sid and therefore
python-libavg is uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (100, '
Package: prestimel
Version: 1:1.0-3.1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
with xorg 6.9 libdps1 has been removed from sid and therefore
prestimel is uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (100, 'uns
Package: php4-imagick
Version: 0.9.11-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
with xorg 6.9 libdps1 has been removed from sid and therefore
php4-imagick is uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (100, 'u
Package: labplot
Version: 1.5.0.5-1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
with xorg 6.9 libdps1 has been removed from sid and therefore labplot
is uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (100, 'unstabl
Package: kxstitch
Version: 0.7-2+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
with xorg 6.9 libdps1 has been removed from sid and therefore kxstitch
is uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (100, 'unstable'
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
Version: 2.6.15-1
Severity: grave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have an ASUS A8V motherboard. When I use both the on-board LAN, skge,
and the on-board Promise PDC20378 SATA controller, one or the other
dies. Ways to kill the machine inc
Package: drawtiming
Version: 0.5-3+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
with xorg 6.9 libdps1 has been removed from sid and therefore
drawtiming is uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (100, 'unsta
Package: libapache-auth-ldap
Version: 1.6.0-8
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
auth_ldap version 1.6.0 contains a remote security vulnerability.
See http://www.digitalarmaments.com/2006090173928420.html for details.
A fixed version (1.6.1) is available at http://ww
Package: libogg
Severity: serious
Version: 1.1.2-1
Tags: patch
>From my pbuilder build log:
...
# if Makefile exists run distclean
if test -f Makefile; then \
/usr/bin/make distclean; \
fi
#if test -d CVS; then \
/usr/bin/make cvs-clean ;\
fi
/bin/s
* Frank Küster:
> Florian, are you on a general search for non-free docs, and looking at
> more files in tetex-doc? Then please also send a Debbugs-Cc to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Woeful copyright file").
I'm aware of that bug report, but think of it as a separate matter
(especially the tex.web stat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 346347 pending
Bug#346347: gpsim: FTBFS: build-depends on xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 344658 important
Bug#344658: vim - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/bin/rview': No such
file or directory
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:17:41 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#321664: marked as done (please allow
for libxaw8-dev)]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:17:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#345249: fixed in kraptor 0.0.20040403-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:02:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346880: fixed in larswm 7.5.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:18:13AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Ah, got it now. Does this look more complete ?
Yes, but there are still a few more places to fix. The attached patch
for 6.2.4.5 should be fairly complete, apart from a few odd places in
coders/, but those fall more into the scope
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 346347 by 248931 347397
Bug#346347: gpsim: FTBFS: build-depends on xlibs-dev
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 248931, 347397
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 347386 guile-gtk-1.2
Bug#347386: guile-gtk: [m68k, ia64]: FTBFS m68k-linux-gcc: command not found
Warning: Unknown package 'guile-gtk'
Bug reassigned from package `guile-gtk' to `guile-gtk-1.2'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact m
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:02:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347112: fixed in libgdiplus 1.1.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: bash
Version: 3.1-2
Severity: grave
| Preparing to replace bash 3.1-1 (using .../archives/bash_3.1-2_s390.deb) ...
| Unpacking replacement bash ...
| cat: /etc/shells: No such file or directory
| Either another instance of /usr/sbin/remove-shell is running, or it was
previously interrupt
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Frank Küster:
>
>> Florian, are you on a general search for non-free docs, and looking at
>> more files in tetex-doc? Then please also send a Debbugs-Cc to
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Woeful copyright file").
>
> I'm aware of that bug report, but think of
tags 347345 +unreproducible moreinfo
tags 347345 -patch
thanks
Hi,
This is some kind of local error. For what it is worth, every
package I build is built in a Sid SELinux UML with just
build-essential packages installed, so it would nto have been
uploaded if it did not build in a base
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 347345 +unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#347345: kernel-package: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'debconf'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo
> tags 347345 -patch
Bug#347345: kernel-package: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'debconf'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 321688
Bug#321688: xfonts-thai-ttf: copyright problems
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> close 321668
Bug#321668: FTBFS in sid
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanatio
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:18:19 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347228: fixed in xorg-x11 6.9.0.dfsg.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:18:19 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347246: fixed in xorg-x11 6.9.0.dfsg.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 346863 pending
Bug#346863: zephyr: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 347412 linux-2.6
Bug#347412: using network (skge) and disk (SATA/promise) at same time = one
breaks
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp' to `linux-2.6'.
>
reopen 321688
close 321668
thanks
Damn it. Sorry about that. I am having really bad luck today, apparently.
Made a typo trying to fix my typo.
--
things change.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Want to generate 1.5 - 3.5k easily from the comfort
of your own home with minimal effort?
Call me here to do it : 1*800*841*9056
Payments are made daily.
Sincerely,
Veronica M. Kennedy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
* Frank Küster:
> #218195 is about the woeful copyright file, not the woeful copyright of
> a particular file... What we really need to do is to sort out which
> parts of teTeX are under which license, and document that clearly (and
> remove if necessary), and to that end collecting information a
severity 347366 important
retitle 347366 kismet: pulls in spurious deps from Magick-config
severity 347395 important
retitle 347395 drip: pulls in spurious deps from Magick-config
severity 347398 important
retitle 347398 imview: pulls in spurious deps from Magick-config
severity 347399 important
re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 347366 important
Bug#347366: depends on libdps1 which is no more available
Severity set to `important'.
> retitle 347366 kismet: pulls in spurious deps from Magick-config
Bug#347366: depends on libdps1 which is no more available
Changed Bug ti
Package: libprelude
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
The build dependency on libgnutls-dev needs to be (>= 1.0.17). Apparently,
libgnutls11-dev (currently at version 1.0.16) also provides libgnutls-dev,
which makes the build of this package fail if that older version
Package: yakuake
Version: 2.7.3-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi. When trying to use yakuake on an environment without KDE stuff, no
prompt is displayed, and it's merely impossible to do anything with
yakuake. It's possible to:
- watch the panel being shown
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 02:53:31PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I just can't resist the urge... Could Amaya NMU amaya? :)
Knock yourself out ... if you're (un?)lucky I might even add you to the
Uploaders line.
> Please, pretty, pretty please!
>
> Only change I would make, if pbuilder wer
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 05:03:55PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:18:13AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > Ah, got it now. Does this look more complete ?
>
> Yes, but there are still a few more places to fix. The attached patch
> for 6.2.4.5 should be fairly complete, ap
On 06-Jan-10 10:22, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Now, please provide a full log of the process you went into
> when you got this error, and we'll try and see why make does
> not ignore errors as directed.
Hello,
thanks for your quick reply to my report!
I can reproduce the bug with the fo
This is CVE-2005-4532.
BTW, did you have a chance to look at this bug yet? I'm considering
to do an NMU for unstable, but I'd prefer if someone who actively uses
scponly and who could test the changes would do the upload.
cheers,
Max
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 346757 patch
Bug#346757: xawtv: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 344418 scponlyc: local privilege escalation (CVE-2005-4532)
Bug#344418: scponlyc: local privilege escalation in versions < 4.2
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:17:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346779: fixed in gcvs 1.0final-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:17:27 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346793: fixed in xautolock 1:2.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
