Bug#337029: marked as done (amsynth: FTBFS (amd64): 'pthread_kill' was not declared in this scope)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 04:36:29 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in latest upstream has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#339485:

merge 339487 339485 thanks In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > This should be merged with 339487 > > (typed "--body" option rather than "--body-file") Merging as requested. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA

Processed: Re: Bug#339485:

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 339487 339485 Bug#339485: kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc: Installation fails in half-installed state, can neither install nor remove Bug#339487: kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc: Installation fails in half-installed state; can neither install nor remove

Bug#295627: marked as done (nis kills sparc64)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:25:11 +0900 (JST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#295627: seems fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Bug#286872: gnopernicus: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment

Hi all, is there any news about this bug? I'd really like to see gnopernicus in testing.. Cheers, Free -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#340127: boo: New version doesn't work

Package: boo Version: 0.7.0.1921-0.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Running booc in the console does: ~$ /usr/bin/booc Unhandled Exception: System.ArgumentNullException: Argument cannot be null. in <0x003c9> System.String:FormatHelper (System.Text.StringBuilder result,

Bug#330191: #330191: klibc 1.1.1-4 FTBFS on sparc

On Sun, 20 Nov 2005, Maximilian Attems wrote: On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 02:41:11PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote: now that linux-headers-2.6.12-1-* is not available in sid anymore, I tried it with linux-headers-2.6.14-2-* (-sparc64 in this case). Besides the fact that the proper asm -> asm-sparc64 s

Bug#330559: marked as done (Uninstallable: depends on phpapi-20020918, unexisting package.)

Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 21:32:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#330559: fixed in turck-mmcache 2.4.6-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: Re: Bug#340106: dhclient script gets wrong kernel majorname

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 340106 dhcp-client Bug#340106: dhclient script gets wrong kernel majorname Warning: Unknown package 'dhclient' Bug reassigned from package `dhclient' to `dhcp-client'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#339431: CVE-2005-3186: Integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM code

Loic Minier wrote: > Sorry for the delay. You can grab the proposed fixes in: > (87M) > MD5: 56148df50af6e28beaca57e4fa3bf6cc Thanks a lot! Packages are building already. > I found the vulnerability matrix by Moritz Muehlenhoff u

Bug#340094: CVE-2005-2781: Execution of arbitrary web code

Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > phpgroupware-fudforum is vulnerable as well, see > http://www.mail-archive.com/phpgroupware-cvs@gnu.org/msg21210.html for a > fix. Yeah. Unfortunately, the fix hasn't been forwarded. Thanks for digging it up. Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.

Bug#340106: Bug confirmed

I confirm this bug, as well as the diagnostic as I was hit by it. It broke my whereami scripts but I however do not think it should be tagged security as I see no security implications. I'm not even sure it deserves the "serious" severity. "important" would be enough but, being trivial to fix, I t

Processed: Scheduled for removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 195744 wontfix Bug#195744: xlander: no speed control Tags were: upstream Tags added: wontfix > tag 339229 wontfix Bug#339229: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > tag 339257

Processed: setting package to sbcl sbcl-common, tagging 338393, tagging 340104

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 > package sbcl sbcl-common Ignoring bugs not assigned to: sbcl sbcl-common > tags 338393 + pending Bug#338393: sbcl: installation fails, register-common-lisp-implementation not found T

Processed: Merging bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 339596 important Bug#339596: apt-src: segfaults Severity set to `important'. > severity 339637 important Bug#339637: dhcp-client: Error in /etc/dhclient-script Bug#339595: /etc/dhclient-script: line 105: [: -lt: unary operator expected Severit

Bug#338296: marked as done (common-lisp-controller 4.15sarge2 broke clisp+cl-asdf)

Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 23:02:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338296: fixed in common-lisp-controller 4.15sarge3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#339431: CVE-2005-3186: Integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM code

On Mon, Nov 21, 2005, Martin Schulze wrote: > > I found the vulnerability matrix by Moritz Muehlenhoff useful: > >Woody gtk2 Woody gdk-pixbuf Sarge gtk2 Sarge gdk-pixbuf > > CVE-2005-29751170 2841170 284 > > CVE-2005-29761317 41

Bug#340094: CVE-2005-2781: Execution of arbitrary web code

On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 07:59 +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > phpgroupware-fudforum is vulnerable as well, see > > http://www.mail-archive.com/phpgroupware-cvs@gnu.org/msg21210.html for a > > fix. > Yeah. > Unfortunately, the fix hasn't been forwarded. Thanks for digging

Processed: notfound 338296 in 4.19

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 > notfound 338296 4.19 Bug#338296: common-lisp-controller 4.15sarge2 broke clisp+cl-asdf Bug marked as not found in version 4.19. (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.) > E

Processed: closing 337994

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 > close 337994 1:0.9.6.0-12 Bug#337994: sbcl: ftbfs [sparc] /usr/bin/clisp: No such file or directory 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked

Processed: Re: Processed: Merging bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 339596 grave Bug#339596: apt-src: segfaults Severity set to `grave'. > tags 339596 - patch Bug#339596: apt-src: segfaults There were no tags set. Tags removed: patch > merge 339595 339637 340109 339711 340106 Bug#339595: /etc/dhclient-script:

Bug#337994: marked as done (sbcl: ftbfs [sparc] /usr/bin/clisp: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 08:26:00 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing ftbs bugs fixed in newest version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#340113: marked as done (stunnel4: stunnel fails to run)

Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 23:17:05 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340113: fixed in stunnel4 2:4.140-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#338040: marked as done (sbcl_1:0.9.6.0-9_powerpc: FTBFS: header files do not match between first and second GENESIS)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 08:26:00 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing ftbs bugs fixed in newest version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#339955: sysv-rc: /etc/init.d/*.sh should be sourced in runlevel S

Brendan O'Dea wrote: > Note: I believe that "return" should work to exit from a script both > when sourced and when executed but perhaps someone with a copy of POSIX > could confirm. Disconfirmation: $ cat /tmp/s #!/bin/bash echo foo return echo bar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/sysvinit/pkg-sysvinit

Processed: severity of 339596 is grave, tagging 339596

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 > # definitely wrong bug... > severity 339596 grave Bug#339596: apt-src: segfaults Severity set to `grave'. > tags 339596 - patch Bug#339596: apt-src: segfaults There were no tags set.

Bug#340081: gpsd: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `floor'

This build problem affect several architectures, not just sparc. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: unmerging 339711, severity of 339711 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 > # not the same bug > unmerge 339711 Bug#339711: Severely broken on sparc Bug#339595: /etc/dhclient-script: line 105: [: -lt: unary operator expected Bug#339637: dhcp-client: Error in

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Processed: Merging bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > unmerge 339711 Bug#339711: Severely broken on sparc Bug is not marked as being merged with any others. > severity 339711 serious Bug#339711: Severely broken on sparc Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if y

Processed: Re: sysv-rc: /etc/init.d/*.sh should be sourced in runlevel S

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 339955 2.86.ds1-1.2 Bug#339955: sysv-rc: /etc/init.d/*.sh should be sourced in runlevel S Bug marked as found in version 2.86.ds1-1.2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admin

<    1   2