Bug#334374: python2.4-psyco: raises ImportError: undefined symbol PyFPE_jbuf (version mismatch?)

Hi, Sorry for the delayed answer, I was on vacation and somehow failed to see your mail when I came back last week. I shall investigate the issue this week and try to see what is wrong. Thanks for your report. -- Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France). http://

Bug#337909: ghc6: regression in Cabal

Package: ghc6 Version: 6.4.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: causes an FTBFS for haskelldb, washngo Tags: upstream patch The following upstream change in 6.4.1 breaks packages that build executables with HS-Source-Dir: --- ghc6-6.4/libraries/Cabal/Distribution/Simple/Install.hs +++ ghc6-6.4.1/

Bug#303156: tecnoballz: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'ecran_hard*' to 'Sint32' loses precision

close 303156 thanks Le mercredi 19 octobre 2005 à 21:00 +1000, Rob Weir a écrit : > Hi Alexis, > > this bug seems to be fixed in your recent uploads to sid; perhaps it > should be closed? > > -rob -- Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#333795: This is an FTBFS bug

tag 333795 +pending thanks On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:31:13PM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote: > package python-scipy > severity 333795 serious > thanks > > This bug should be RC since it makes the package unbuildable. Thanks for the notice. I'll upload an updated package fixing the problem shortl

Bug#337443: python2.1-logilab-common: Uninstallable due to unavailable python2.1-optik

tag 337443 +pending thanks On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:12:02PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Package: python2.1-logilab-common > Severity: grave > Version: 0.12.0-2 > > Hi > > python2.1-logilab-common is not installable in sid anymore as > python2

Bug#337881: udev postinstall fails because udevd is running

On Nov 07, Emilio Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The udev package dont isntall properly because udevd is running. I have Can you see any obvious reason about why it's not being stopped? prerm just uses: start-stop-daemon --stop --exec /sbin/udevd --oknodo --quiet || true -- ciao, Marco

Processed: Re: Bug#303156: tecnoballz: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'ecran_hard*' to 'Sint32' loses precision

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 303156 Bug#303156: tecnoballz: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'ecran_hard*' to 'Sint32' loses precision 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Andreas Jochens <[EMAI

Processed: Re: Bug#337443: python2.1-logilab-common: Uninstallable due to unavailable python2.1-optik

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 337443 +pending Bug#337443: python2.1-logilab-common: Uninstallable due to unavailable python2.1-optik There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking s

Processed: Re: Bug#333795: This is an FTBFS bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 333795 +pending Bug#333795: libwxgtk2.4-1-python -> python-wxgtk2.4 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#337910: segfaults with apt-get source if package not there.

Package: apt-get Severity: serious Justification: segfaults. apt-get source php-myadmin Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Speicherzugriffsfehler (segfault) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'),

Bug#337258: cmucl: FTBFS with new tetex-bin: Cannot find src/docs/interface/toolkit.dvi

Le Samedi 05 Novembre 2005 10:18, Peter Van Eynde a écrit : > Hello, > > On Thursday 03 November 2005 16:13, Daniel Schepler wrote: > > This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4) > > entering extended mode > > (./internals.tex > > ... > > Output written on toolkit.pdf (8 pages, 10204

Processed: Blocked by #337909

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > block 337275 by 337909 Bug#337275: libghc6-haskelldb-dev: Uninstallable, FTBFS with current GHC Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 337909 > block 337603 by 337909 Bug#337603: washngo - FTBFS Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs add

Bug#337881: udev post-inst fails: extra info

Package: udev Version: 0.072-2 Followup-For: Bug #337881 I'm seeing the same thing. start-stop-daemon doesn't work & the dpkg preinst fails. After killing udevd by hand and issuing a dpkg --pending --configure start-stop-daemon can stop udevd with no problems! cheers, Phil -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#337910: segfaults with apt-get source if package not there.

reassign 337910 apt severity 337910 important thanks * Wilfried Goesgens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-07 09:40]: > Package: apt-get > Severity: serious > Justification: segfaults. > > apt-get source php-myadmin > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree... Done > Speicherzugriffsf

Processed: Re: Bug#337910: segfaults with apt-get source if package not there.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 337910 apt Bug#337910: segfaults with apt-get source if package not there. Warning: Unknown package 'apt-get' Bug reassigned from package `apt-get' to `apt'. > severity 337910 important Bug#337910: segfaults with apt-get source if package not

Processed: Change submitter address

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 337439 Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug#337439: php-pager: FTBFS: Can't rm -*/package.xml Changed Bug submitter from Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > thanks Stopping processing here. Pleas

Bug#337907: marked as done (unnecessary and "broken" depends on libqt3c102-mt)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:47:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337907: fixed in vym 1.7.0+cvs1.7.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0

Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> Frank K?ster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > tags 328749 patch >> > thanks >> > >> > Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from >>

Bug#332290: marked as done (horde3: Application is in a severely insecure state during configuration)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332290: fixed in horde3 3.0.4-4sarge1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#332289: marked as done (permissions on /etc/horde/horde3/* are too lax)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332289: fixed in horde3 3.0.4-4sarge1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#323687: diveintopython: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL1.1] does not comply with DFSG

Upstream has been contacted about this, when he replies I shall either upload a new release under a new license, or move it to non-free. Ross -- Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem still exists

Kenward Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: tetex-bin > Version: 3.0-10.1 > Followup-For: Bug #334613 > > > I haven't upgraded Sid in several weeks--is it possible that something's > significantly different in the conf files such that choosing to keep my > old one is a problem? Yes, the

Bug#337797: I'm sure it's not only a nvidia-driver bug

> > >El domingo, 6 de noviembre de 2005 16:42, Manolo Díaz escribió: >> Package: xbase-clients >> Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 >> Severity: critical >> Justification: breaks the whole system > > Hello, Manolo. > > Your concept of "it breaks the whole system" is nice. > > Sorry, it only h

Bug#337881:

Same problem here on powerpc (udev version 0.072-1) (It seems that udevd was stopped.). I downloaded the package and "dpkg -i" it. Best regards, Bin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328749: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0

Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm done with all the fixes but when installing I'm getting the following > message: > > Warning: fmtutil is being run as root; fmtutil-sys should probably be > used instead. If this is done by a Debian package upon installation, > upg

Bug#337881: udev post-inst fails: extra info

On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:09:55AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Nov 07, Philip Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm seeing the same thing. start-stop-daemon doesn't work & the dpkg > > preinst fails. After killing udevd by hand and issuing a > Are you using a 2.6.12 kernel you too? 2

Bug#337881: udev post-inst fails: extra info

On Nov 07, Philip Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does start-stop-daemon --stop --exec /sbin/udevd work from the command > > line? > > Nope. I tried that: > > trigger:/home/phil# dpkg --configure -a > Setting up udev (0.072-2) ... > dpkg: error processing udev (--configure): > subproce

Bug#336751: marked as done (openvpn: Format string vulnerability in config parsing code)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 02:02:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336751: fixed in openvpn 2.0.5-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#337853: openoffice.org-common: openoffice.org programs don't start

reassign 337853 openoffice.org tag 337853 + moreinfo severity 337853 important thanks Am Sonntag, 6. November 2005 22:59 schrieb Paulo Jorge Jesus Silva: > Package: openoffice.org-common > Version: 2.0.0-2 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable Uh, you talk about that the bin

Bug#337881: udev post-inst fails: extra info

On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:50:51AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Nov 07, Philip Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does start-stop-daemon --stop --exec /sbin/udevd work from the command > > > line? > > > > Nope. I tried that: > > > > trigger:/home/phil# dpkg --configure -a > > Setting u

Processed: Re: Bug#337853: openoffice.org-common: openoffice.org programs don't start

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 337853 openoffice.org Bug#337853: openoffice.org-common: openoffice.org programs don't start Bug reassigned from package `openoffice.org-common' to `openoffice.org'. > tag 337853 + moreinfo Bug#337853: openoffice.org-common: openoffice.org pro

Processed: Fixed in upload of ekg2 20051106+1657-1 to experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 275384 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#275384: No manpage There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > tag 332842 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#332842: ekg2: FTBFS: ls: libltdl/*: No such file or directory Tags were: experimental Tags adde

Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0

Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> Frank K?ster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > tags 328749 patch > >> > thanks > >> > > >> > Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >> >>

Bug#328749: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0

Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > I'm done with all the fixes but when installing I'm getting the following >> > message: >> > >> > Warning: fmtutil is being run as root; fmtuti

Bug#328749: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0

Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm done with all the fixes but when installing I'm getting the following > > message: > > > > Warning: fmtutil is being run as root; fmtutil-sys should probably be > > used instead. If this i

Bug#328749: marked as done (package installation fails with teTeX 3.0)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328749: fixed in xmltex 1.9-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#334736: marked as done (xmltex: Fails to install in unstable (and probably testing))

Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328749: fixed in xmltex 1.9-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#328749: marked as done (package installation fails with teTeX 3.0)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334736: fixed in xmltex 1.9-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#334736: marked as done (xmltex: Fails to install in unstable (and probably testing))

Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334736: fixed in xmltex 1.9-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#336666: marked as done (xmltex: unmet dependencies in sid)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#33: fixed in xmltex 1.9-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#328749: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0

Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > I'm done with all the fixes but when installing I'm getting the following > >> > message: > >>

Bug#337872: marked as forwarded (FTBFS (alpha): invalid va_list* usage)

Your message dated Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:31:20 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has caused the Debian Bug report #337872, regarding FTBFS (alpha): invalid va_list* usage to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NB: If you are a system admini

Processed: Re: udev post-inst fails

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 337881 -1 Bug#337881: udev post-inst fails Bug 337881 cloned as bug 337942. > reassign -1 dpkg Bug#337942: udev post-inst fails Bug reassigned from package `udev' to `dpkg'. > retitle -1 dpkg: s-s-d --stop --exec is an unreliable misfeature Bug#

Bug#334374: marked as done (python2.4-psyco: raises ImportError: undefined symbol PyFPE_jbuf (version mismatch?))

Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 04:47:24 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334374: fixed in psyco 1.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#337881: udev post-inst fails

clone 337881 -1 reassign -1 dpkg retitle -1 dpkg: s-s-d --stop --exec is an unreliable misfeature thanks Ultimately, the issue here is that start-stop-daemon --stop --exec is a misfeature that's too unreliable to be allowed to survive. Given that we include tools in the distro such as prelink whi

Bug#337440: marked as done (php-radius: FTBFS: php4: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 05:17:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337440: fixed in php-radius 1.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#337881: udev post-inst fails: extra info

On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:50:51AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Are you using prelink or something else which could cause /sbin/udevd to > change? I do not understand why s-s-d is failing to find the process. This appears to be the same problem as bug #256790. If the running daemon's on disk bina

Bug#337942: Bug#337881: udev post-inst fails: extra info

On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:50:51AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Are you using prelink or something else which could cause /sbin/udevd to > change? I do not understand why s-s-d is failing to find the process. This appears to be the same problem as bug #256790. If the running daemon's on disk bina

Bug#294377: ttt: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): unrecognized command line option "-fwritable-strings"

Hi, NMU patch below. debdiff ttt_1.7-3.dsc /srv/pbuilder/result/ttt_1.7-3.1.dsc configure|2 +- configure.in |2 +- net_names.c |5 +++-- ttt-1.7/debian/changelog |8 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff -u ttt-

Bug#337945: format fails to build in postinst

Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > fmtutil-sys: running `tex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex > &latex jadetex.This is TeX, Version 3.141592 (Web2C 7.5.4) (INITEX) > ---! /var/lib/texmf/web2c/latex.fmt was written by pdfetex > (Fatal format file error; I'm stymied) > > The other f

Processed: Fixed in NMU of ttt 1.7-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 262758 + fixed Bug#262758: ttt: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'inet6_ntoa' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tag 294377 + fixed Bug#294377: ttt: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): unrecognized command line option "-fwritable-strings" Tags were:

Bug#337945: format fails to build in postinst

Hi Frank! You wrote: > It tries to build jadetex with the tex engine, but the latex format > (which is loaded by jadetex) was generated with pdfetex - this is the > default since 3.0. You must have old configuration files and refused > the updates; but in fact they must be very old, because even

Processed: Re: annoyance-filter: FTBFS with g++-3.4: due to new template lookup rules

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity #283296 serious Bug#283296: annoyance-filter: FTBFS with g++-3.4: due to new template lookup rules Severity set to `serious'. > merge #283296 #300174 Bug#283296: annoyance-filter: FTBFS with g++-3.4: due to new template lookup rules Bug#3001

Bug#300174: annoyance-filter: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): there are no arguments to 'begin' that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of 'begin' must be available

Hi, NMU patch is attached. Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/ debdiff annoyance-filter_1.0.0b-4.dsc annoyance-filter_1.0.0b-4.1.dsc annoyance-filter-1.0.0b/debian/changelog |9 +++ annoyance-filter-1.0.0b/debian/rules |4 - annoyance-filter.cc

Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem still exists

On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:29:25AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Kenward Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Package: tetex-bin > > Version: 3.0-10.1 > > Followup-For: Bug #334613 > > > > > > I haven't upgraded Sid in several weeks--is it possible that something's > > significantly different i

Bug#337495: This is CVE-2005-3523

Hi! Please mention the CVE tracking number CVE-2005-3523 in the changelog when you fix this. Thanks! Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Bug#337865: marked as done (udev - udevd fails to timeout events if the kernel have no inotify)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 06:47:18 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337865: fixed in udev 0.073-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#337881: marked as done (udev post-inst fails)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 06:47:18 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337881: fixed in udev 0.073-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#337957: evolution-exchange: unable to setup exchange account

Package: evolution-exchange Version: 2.2.3-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (800, 'testing'), (60, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel

Bug#337959: libsane-extras: Sane does not receive the scanned picture

Package: libsane-extras Version: 1.0.16.9 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I have a Epson RX600 (scanner, printer and card reader). "epson" is commented in /etc/sane.d/dll.conf and I use the epkowa driver from libsane-extras. When I ask for a preview with xsane or when I

Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem still exists

Kenward Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:29:25AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: >> Kenward Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Package: tetex-bin >> > Version: 3.0-10.1 >> > Followup-For: Bug #334613 >> > >> > >> > I haven't upgraded Sid in several weeks--is it p

Bug#337854: tar: FTBFS; Failed tests

severity 337854 normal thanks Hi, this only happens when I run pbuilder in a tmpfs chroot. It turned out that the respective test (pipe.at) compares file lists. Under tmpfs, the file order in the archive file2 file1 is different from the one expected by "tar xfz": file1 file2 I.e. the files m

Bug#337945: format fails to build in postinst

Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Frank! > > You wrote: > >> It tries to build jadetex with the tex engine, but the latex format >> (which is loaded by jadetex) was generated with pdfetex - this is the >> default since 3.0. You must have old configuration files and refused >> the upda

Processed: tar: FTBFS; Failed tests

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 337854 normal Bug#337854: tar: FTBFS: Failed tests Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To

Bug#336114: Forwarded upstream

tags 336114 +upstream forwarded 336114 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24712 thanks Forwarded upstream as GCC bug number 24712. -- Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Make sure your vote will count. http://www.verifiedvoting.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Processed: Forwarded upstream

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 336114 +upstream Bug#336114: gcc-4.0_4.0.1-9 backwards incompatible changes There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > forwarded 336114 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24712 Bug#336114: gcc-4.0_4.0.1-9 backwards incompatible change

Processed: Fixed in NMU of annoyance-filter 1.0.0b-4.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 300174 + fixed Bug#300174: annoyance-filter: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): there are no arguments to 'begin' that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of 'begin' must be available Tags were: patch Bug#283296: annoyance-filter: FTBFS with g++-

Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem still exists

On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 16:35 +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > prefer outlines: `true'. > texhash enabled: `true'. > download standard fonts (dvips): `false'. > download standard fonts (pdftex): `false'. > download standard fonts (dvipdfm): `false'. [...] > ls -ld /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/d

Bug#337018: evolution-data-server: Upgrade did not fix issue

Package: evolution-data-server Version: 1.2.3-8 Followup-For: Bug #337018 Hi guys, Unfortunately upgrading the package did not fix the issue. I am still experiencing it, my contact list looks empty even though it's not. I tried running the 2 helpers provided in the previous bug reports without

Bug#334936: marked as done (francine: Uninstallable in unstable: please build-depend on libslang1-dev or libslang2-dev)

Your message dated Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:17:44 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Done in version 0.99.8orig-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Bug#337964: gnucash: Uninstallable

Package: gnucash Version: 1.8.10-19 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable gnucash is currently not installable due to dependency issues with slib and guile-1.6-slib -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') A

Bug#337965: wine crashes on startup, can't run any applications

Package: wine Version: 0.9-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable asus:~> wine Wine called with no arguments. Invoking /usr/lib/wine/wine.bin ... wine: creating configuration directory '/home/andersa/.wine'... *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x7ecb57fc *** wine

Bug#337602: marked as done (lcrash - FTBFS: error: static declaration of 'cache_tail' follows non-static declaration)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 08:02:10 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337602: fixed in lcrash 7.0.0.pre.cvs.20050322-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#337018: [Evolution] Bug#337018: evolution-data-server: Upgrade did not fix issue

On Mon, Nov 07, 2005, Benjamin FRANCOIS wrote: > Unfortunately upgrading the package did not fix the issue. I am still > experiencing it, my contact list looks empty even though it's not. Did you kill evolution-data-server processes? -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "What do we want? BRAINS!

Bug#337945: format fails to build in postinst

Hi Frank! You wrote: > > Hmm, weird. dpkg only prompted me about one file, which I let it replace: > > It's a jadetex conffile, therefore the question must have been asked > much earlier. ah, I see: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 271 2005-03-09 14:05 40jadetex.cnf.dpkg-dist After copying that on

Processed: severity of 337797 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 > severity 337797 important Bug#337797: xbase-clients: [beforelight] beforelight hangs my system Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#337018: [Evolution] Bug#337018: evolution-data-server: Upgrade did not fix issue

On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 05:24:50PM +0100, Loic Minier wrote : > On Mon, Nov 07, 2005, Benjamin FRANCOIS wrote: > > Unfortunately upgrading the package did not fix the issue. I am still > > experiencing it, my contact list looks empty even though it's not. > > Did you kill evolution-data-server pr

Bug#337018: [Evolution] Bug#337018: evolution-data-server: Upgrade did not fix issue

On Mon, Nov 07, 2005, Benjamin FRANCOIS wrote: > Could we expect the package to stop/start the process automatically in > the future, by any chance ? Are there some technical aspects that > prevent from doing it ? evolution should already kill it, I think even --force-shutdown doesn't succeed i

Bug#337972: libungif4g: buffer overflows and NULL dereference

Package: libungif4g Version: 4.1.3-2 Severity: critical Tags: security patch Hi! Chris Evans discovered several buffer overflows (CVE-2005-3350) and a NULL dereference (CVE-2005-2974), which were fixed upstream in 4.1.4. Here is the Ubuntu patch which only contains the security relevant bits: h

Bug#337974: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7: i2o controller probe failed err -110

Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7 Version: 2.6.12-10 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Kernel hangs at boot after failing to init iop0: ... iop0: get status timeout iop0: reset rejected trying to clear iop0: unable to clear (status=0xbe) i2o controller probe failed err -1

Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10

On 05.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > On 03.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >>Hilmar Preusse wrote: > >>>On 24.10.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, > fmtutil-sys: running `etex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex > &latex jadetex.in

Bug#337945: format fails to build in postinst

Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Frank! > > You wrote: > >> > Hmm, weird. dpkg only prompted me about one file, which I let it replace: >> >> It's a jadetex conffile, therefore the question must have been asked >> much earlier. > > ah, I see: > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 271 2005-

Bug#337972: Test pictures

Hi again! I forgot to mention some demo pictures: http://scary.beasts.org/misc/bad1.gif http://scary.beasts.org/misc/bad2.gif http://scary.beasts.org/misc/bad3.gif They will mak e. g. gifinfo or feh crash without the patch. Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer h

Bug#337978: bse-alsa - FTBFS: wrong build dependencies

Package: bse-alsa Version: 0.6.6-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of bse-alsa_0.6.6-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), beast, libasound2-de

Bug#337979: haskell-http - FTBFS: unsuitable build dependency

Package: haskell-http Version: 0.4.20050430-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of haskell-http_0.4.20050430-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0),

Bug#337980: slgsl - FTBFS: slsh: command not found

Package: slgsl Version: 0.5.2-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of slgsl_0.5.2-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libslang2-dev (>= 2.0.4-6)

Bug#337981: slhist - FTBFS: slsh: command not found

Package: slhist Version: 0.3.1-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of slhist_0.3.1-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libslang2-dev (>= 2.0.4-

Processed: severity of 337972 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 > # doesn't open a hole by installing the package, right? > severity 337972 grave Bug#337972: libungif4g: buffer overflows and NULL dereference Severity set to `grave'. > End of messag

Bug#327171: ugly but working!

Hello, i want to give pype a try and what did i see? yeah, it crashed, again and again :D For me pype runs... Here the diff (it just remove the icon thing - but its better to have no icons than have no (working) editor...) so here just the diff.. mfg 403c403 < #EXT_TO_IMG = {'python':1}

Bug#337959: libsane-extras: Sane does not receive the scanned picture

severity 337959 normal thanks Antoine Hulin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > I'll gladely help to track this problem. The last time I used my scanner was > some days before mid-september ; I can't tell which version of libsane was > installed at the time though. sane-backends-extras (1.0.16.6)

Processed: Re: Bug#337959: libsane-extras: Sane does not receive the scanned picture

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 337959 normal Bug#337959: libsane-extras: Sane does not receive the scanned picture Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrato

Bug#337987: gtranslator: Saving po file make program crash

Package: gtranslator Version: 1.1.6-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When I save some po files, the application crashes. It happens with some po files not all, it's certainly due to a encoding problem. Here is the output of gtranslator : (gtranslator:7842): gtranslator-

Bug#337989: rubyfilter: FTBFS: tries to overwrite read-only NEWS file

Package: rubyfilter Version: 0.12-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi, building the package rubyfilter in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] ---> bin mkdir -p /tmp/buildd/rubyfilter-0.12

Bug#337404: marked as done (nautilus-sendto: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 10:17:23 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337404: fixed in nautilus-sendto 0.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#337992: acidlab: sarge to sid upgrade mess with conffiles

Package: acidlab Version: 0.9.6b20-13 Severity: serious When upgrading from sarge, acidlab mess with conffiles and triggers the dpkg conffiles handling for the file /etc/acidlab/acid_conf.php while I did not modify it, which is confusing. See the piuparts log at

Bug#337994: sbcl: ftbfs [sparc] /usr/bin/clisp: No such file or directory

Package: sbcl Version: 1:0.9.6.0-9 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source sbcl failed to build on a sparc buildd and other buildds, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. CFLAGS="-DSBCL_HOME=`pwd`/stage1/ -O2" GNUMAKE=make ./make.sh "/usr/bin/clisp -norc -q -L english -E UTF-8

Bug#337996: FTBFS: xine-lib debian/rules contains a bashism

Package: xine-lib Version: 1.0.1-1.3 Severity: serious xine-lib's debian/rules contains the following: mv debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/xine/{faq,README*} \ debian/libxine1/usr/share/doc/libxine1 This fails with dash as sh, since it doesn't understand {faq,README*}. The easiest fix would be

Bug#318719: tecnoballz: Still does not run (on sarge)

Hello Andreas, did you try running tecnoballz after compiling it in unstable for amd64? I rebuild the latest version (tecnoballz-0.91-cvs20050828) on sarge (I had to override some dependencies, but the build went fine) and it crashed again. The backtrace for this version follows. Alexis: I just sa

Bug#337974: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7: i2o controller probe failed err -110

* Bill Gatliff wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7 > Version: 2.6.12-10 Can you please give 2.6.14-2 a try? Thanks, Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#337987: gtranslator: Saving po file make program crash

On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 07:08:08PM +0100, Sylvain Archenault wrote: > When I save some po files, the application crashes. It happens with some > po files not all, it's certainly due to a encoding problem. > Here is the output of gtranslator : > (gtranslator:7842): gtranslator-WARNING **: > /home

  1   2   >