Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Szenario:
While copying some GBs to the filesystem under heavy load the filesystem
gets corrupted.
The SMART Status of all disks is "passed", they are all new. The hardware
components of
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 10:10 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> And then it fails for ehci-hcd too (which is not loaded at all).
> Rusty, do you have other ideas for debugging?
I have reread the bug reports, and meditated on this issue some more.
This is a possibility I was aware of when I changed to cod
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 336150 grave
Bug#336150: amaya: do not allow into testing
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
tag 324982 pending
thanks
Hi Debian Jed Maintainers,
after consulting with Rafael who has no objections, I hereby announce my
intention to NMU jed with the attached patch. The intention is to have a
workable jed in unstable while allowing you to stay focused on finishing
off the packaging of the
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 05:24:44PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 10:10 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > And then it fails for ehci-hcd too (which is not loaded at all).
> > Rusty, do you have other ideas for debugging?
>
> I have reread the bug reports, and meditated on this is
Is it possible for you to see if this problem also exists in 2.6.12?
There is a 2.6.12-5.99.sarge1 backport at
http://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-2.6/
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
> # unsuitable-for-release bugs are sev: serious
> severity 336150 serious
Bug#336150: amaya: do not allow into testing
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stopping processing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 324982 pending
Bug#324982: jed: FTBFS: Build-Depends cannot be satisfied because no available
versions of package slang1-dev can satisfy version requirements
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact m
Quoting Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is it possible for you to see if this problem also exists in 2.6.12?
>
> There is a 2.6.12-5.99.sarge1 backport at
> http://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-2.6/
I will give it a try, but unfortunately not before wednesday.
--
kiu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
This is probably caused by glibc's #223110.
Thiemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
found 328209 0.30.204-5sarge2
tags +patch
thanks
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> I'm aware of this problem. Not really sure that it should be considered
> grave but as we have a solution to it I do not really bother.
I considered it as grave beause util-vserv
retitle 334833 CVE-2005-1527 still not fixed in stable branch
retitle 336137 CVE-2005-1527 still not fixed in stable branch
severity 334833 grave
found 334833 6.4.1
merge 336137 334833
thanks
* FX:
> Version 6.4-1.1 which fixed CAN-2005-152 on Sept 4, 2005 is still not
> available in the stable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 334833 CVE-2005-1527 still not fixed in stable branch
Bug#334833: CAN-2005-1527 still not fixed in stable branch
Changed Bug title.
(By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)
> retitle 336137 CVE-2005-1527 still not fixed in stable bra
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.2-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Well, i confirm that this problem is also present on powerpc, using
gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3 makes the kernel build fail, while using -2 seems to be
ok. I have heard people mentioning two other arches where this is t
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.7-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
05.41.42 CVE: Not Available
Platform: Cross Platform
Title: Mozilla Firefox IFRAME Handling Remote Buffer Overflow
Description: Mozilla Firefox is reported to be vulnerable to a remote
buffer overflow issue due to improper bo
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:25:58PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> > I incorporated Lennert's suggestion and created a patch that fixes the
> > problem on at least i386.
>
> It seems like you've missed two more places in debian/rules2:
>
> ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM),linux)
> ifeq
Sven Luther wrote:
> Package: gcc-4.0
> Version: 4.0.2-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Well, i confirm that this problem is also present on powerpc, using
> gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3 makes the kernel build fail, while using -2 seems to be
> ok. I have heard people mentio
Thanks a lot!
I'll try to convince the release managers to allow me to upload a new
fixed version.
Regards,
// Ola
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 05:03:53PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> found 328209 0.30.204-5sarge2
> tags +patch
> thanks
>
> Ola Lun
tags 336117 + patch pending
thank :)
This bug only appears when there is not any previous user and you are going to
create the first. There is no problem when you already have a user.
Your patch is fine, I'll fix the problem and then, i'll send it to the
upstream.
Thank you.
Ana
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 334833 6.4.1
Bug#334833: CVE-2005-1527 still not fixed in stable branch
Bug marked as not found in version 6.4.1.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
> found 334833 6.4-1
Bug#334833: CVE-2005-1527 still not fixed in stable bran
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 334833
Bug#334833: CVE-2005-1527 still not fixed in stable branch
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> merge 336137 334833
Bug#334833: CVE-2005-1527 still not fixed in stable branch
Bug#336137: CVE-2005-1527 still not fixed in stable branch
M
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # this bug *is* fixed in testing/unstable!
> close 334833 6.4-1.1
Bug#334833: CVE-2005-1527 still not fixed in stable branch
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug#336137: CVE-2005-1527 still not fixed in stable bra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 334833 6.4-1.1
Bug#334833: CVE-2005-1527 still not fixed in stable branch
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug#336137: CVE-2005-1527 still not fixed in stable branch
Bug marked as fixed in version 6.4-1.1, s
Package: rpc2
Version: 1.13-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source with the following error:
| Automatic build of rpc2_1.13-3 on odin by sbuild/sparc 69
| Build started at 20051028-0304
Package: rvm
Version: 1.6-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source with the following error:
| Automatic build of rvm_1.6-4 on odin by sbuild/sparc 69
| Build started at 20051028-0305
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 05:02:58PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> After upgrading from 8.0+8.1beta-3 to 8.0+8.1beta3-1, I get
>
> pannekake:~# /etc/init.d/postgresql-8.1 start
> Starting PostgreSQL 8.1 database server: mainError: Could not parse
> locale out of pg_controldata output
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 336117 + patch pending
Bug#336117: Python syntax error prevents starting
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, pending
> thank :)
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
I just noticed that your NMU patch for jed posted to this bug is incomplete --
you also need to fix the binary dependencies of jed-common, or jed will still
be uninstallable.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
Hi Daniel,
thanks for the hint. I should have tested in the same clean chroot I
noticed the bug in before posting the patch. :)
So here is the correct one.
Daniel Schepler wrote:
> I just noticed that your NMU patch for jed posted to this bug is incomplete
> --
> you also need to fix the binary
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 05:02:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336117: fixed in cycle 0.3.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi,
here's the patch for the NMU:
diff -u snownews-1.5.6.1/debian/changelog snownews-1.5.6.1/debian/changelog
--- snownews-1.5.6.1/debian/changelog
+++ snownews-1.5.6.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+snownews (1.5.6.1-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix typedef i
Package: libemail-valid-perl
Severity: serious
Version: 0.15-2
>From my build log for libemail-valid-perl, on a machine which was
offline at the moment:
...
/usr/bin/make test
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/libemail-valid-perl-0.15'
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::
Package: udev
Version: 0.071-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
when installed, the timeout (udevd_timeout variable from
/etc/init.d/udev) is not set big enough to wait for creation of certain
devices (in particular /dev/hd* and ethernet card). This makes the
/etc/init.d/m
severity 335609 important
tags 335609 + sarge help
stop
Brandon Ehle wrote:
Ove Kaaven wrote:
I cannot reproduce this. Perhaps your system is outdated and this has
been fixed somewhere long ago. But "Monospace" is not a real font, it is
an alias for other fonts. I believe this alias is defined
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 333959 + fixed
Bug#333959: snownews: segfaults in amd64 when reloading feeds
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 335609 important
Bug#335609: installing libwine causes the Monospace font to be replaced with
Wine Marlett
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 335609 + sarge help
Bug#335609: installing libwine causes the Monospace font to be replaced with
W
FYI, m68k also has this problem.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Oct 28, Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The latter is the simplest option. Please try this patch (it will be in
> the next release, too). If it seems to work, please ack.
No luck.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
severity 336189 normal
thanks
On Oct 28, Dominik Sauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> when I change the timeout to higher value (26 on my machine, but your
Which POS hardware are you using? This is a bit uncommon...
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 336189 normal
Bug#336189: udev: doesnt wait long enough to finish children
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 06:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335826: fixed in libcommons-validator-java 1:1.1.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Attached is the diff for the NMU.
diff -u ntp-4.2.0a+stable/debian/changelog ntp-4.2.0a+stable/debian/changelog
--- ntp-4.2.0a+stable/debian/changelog
+++ ntp-4.2.0a+stable/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+ntp (1:4.2.0a+stable-8.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * 0-day BSP NMU.
+ * ntp_config.c: a
The patch for sarge, also fixes CVE-2005-3301 and CAN-2005-2869.
--
.''`.Piotr Roszatycki, Netia SA
: :' :mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-
=== debian/changelog
==
--- debian/changelog (revisi
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 06:32:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328203: fixed in statdataml 1.0.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: openvrml
Version: 0.15.10-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of openvrml_0.15.10-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../lib/antlr -I../../java
> -I../../src/libopenvrml -DOPENVRM
Package: ipw-2100
Version: ipw2100-source
Severity: serious
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-amd64-k8
Locale: [EM
Package: hugs
Version: 98.200503.08-3
Severity: serious
Justification: package must BFS
Hi,
here is the problem:
$ fakeroot apt-get -b source hugs
[...]
*** NOW DO: make ; make install
touch debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 327012 + fixed
Bug#327012: FTBFS: does't build in current unstable
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 328334 + fixed
Bug#328334: xnecview: please rebuild against latest libpng
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 328335 + fixed
Bug#328335: tuxpuck: please rebuild against latest libpng
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Hi,
NMU patch below.
diff -u smtpfeed-1.19/debian/changelog smtpfeed-1.19/debian/changelog
--- smtpfeed-1.19/debian/changelog
+++ smtpfeed-1.19/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+smtpfeed (1.19-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * 0-day BSP NMU.
+ * Apply patch by Andreas Jochens to build with gcc-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 328333 + fixed
Bug#328333: printbill: please rebuild against latest libpng
There were no tags set.
Bug#335365: printbill - build-depends against removed package
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 263252 + fixed
Bug#263252: gnome-iconedit: links to older libpng2 package
There were no tags set.
Bug#328343: gnome-iconedit: please rebuild against latest libpng
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 332447 + fixed
Bug#332447: FTBFS: libmagick transition
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs datab
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 325490 + fixed
Bug#325490: ale: rebuild against libmagick9 needed
Tags were: sid
Bug#332451: FTBFS: libmagick transition
Tags added: fixed
> tag 332451 + fixed
Bug#332451: FTBFS: libmagick transition
Tags were: fixed sid
Bug#325490: ale: rebuild ag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 316221
Bug#316221: freepops: init script doesn't work with dash
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> stop
Stopping processing he
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 332216 + fixed
Bug#332216: kismet: depends on unavailable libmagick6 package
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319509: fixed in psycopg 1.1.21-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333638: fixed in psycopg 1.1.21-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 298414 + fixed
Bug#298414: smtpfeed: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid storage class for function
'newmx'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333639: fixed in psycopg 1.1.21-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327415: fixed in psycopg 1.1.21-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I uploaded during the BSP.
Cheers
Luk
- --
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ver
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:26:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
Hi,
NMU diff below.
diff -u cheops-0.61/debian/control cheops-0.61/debian/control
--- cheops-0.61/debian/control
+++ cheops-0.61/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: net
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: libsnmp-dev, libgtk1.2
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:45:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line binNMU done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 334252 + fixed
Bug#334252: animals: Uninstallable on sid; needs rebuild
Tags were: sid
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 331619 + fixed
Bug#331619: cheops: please update with newer libsnmp version
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:03:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line snort: Remote buffer overflow in the 'bo' preprocessor
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
A Divendres 28 Octubre 2005 04:48, Steve M. Robbins va escriure:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:24:13AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I'm wondering whether the last four months have provided enough time to
> > confirm this is still a bug deserving of the "grave" status. Becau
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 06:16:24PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
> I have updated and upgrade today, and I have installed geomview:
> ii geomview 1.8.1-9 interactive geometry viewing program
>
> I'm using Nvidia driver well configured and no graphics problem I have by now.
>
You asked for a CVE number. This is CVE-2005-3330.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 328209 0.30.204-5sarge2
Bug#328209: util-vserver: built with wrong vserver syscall
Bug marked as found in version 0.30.204-5sarge2.
> tags +patch
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
> close 320183 0.10.12
Bug#320183: ethereal: Multiple security issues in various dissectors
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug#320192: ethereal:
Package: bumprace-data
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: serious
The in-game help for bumprace includes credits for the various
components; one of them is "Backgrounds: Unknown (see AUTHORS)". From
the AUTHORS file:
> Backgounds grabbed from the "eterm-backgrounds_1.0-1.deb" the authors say
> about
>
A Divendres 28 Octubre 2005 19:10, Steve M. Robbins va escriure:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 06:16:24PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
> > I have updated and upgrade today, and I have installed geomview:
> > ii geomview 1.8.1-9 interactive geometry viewing program
> >
> > I'm u
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 09:22:28AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> dvipng fails to build because it tries to use some files in the
> texinfo package but does not build-depend upon it:
I've NMUed this during the current BSP with the following patch:
diff -Naur dvipng-1.5.bak/debian/changelog dvipng-1.5/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 332702 + fixed
Bug#332702: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on texinfo
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 336219 grave
Bug#336219: don't let libqalculate get into testing now
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 08:44:17PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
> > 1. apt-get source geomview
> > 2. build a new deb with current libs and compiler tool chain
> > 3. install and run new geomview
> well, I don't have much time now, but I have problem building the packege:
> I have done 1
Package: subversion
Version: 1.2.3dfsg1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Invoking any of the executables in the subversion package fails like the
following examle:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ svn
svn: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libsvn_client-1.so.0: undefined
symbol: svn_ct
Il giorno mer, 26/10/2005 alle 20.02 +0800, binghe ha scritto:
> Package: cl-ironclad
> Version: 0.9.0.dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
>
> I use '(clc:clc-require :ironclad)' to compile it, all of them get just errors
> in cmucl, sbcl and clisp:
Hmmm. I wasn't able to reproduce your errors on cmucl n
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:03:01 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334780: fixed in debian-installer 20051026
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 335849 important
Bug#335849: tightvncserver: Unable to set fontpath in AMD64
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
reassign 329090 kernel-patch-vserver
retitle 329090 barrier not working, but chroot escape does on 2.4 kernel
tags 329090 + moreinfo
merge 329087 329090
thanks
Hi
With this information I'm now reassigning this to the kernel-patch-vserver
package and merging it to the existing bug there.
A simple
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 329090 kernel-patch-vserver
Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does
Bug reassigned from package `util-vserver' to `kernel-patch-vserver'.
> retitle 329090 barrier not working, but chroot escape does on 2.4 kernel
I installed the build-deps and ran dpkg-buildpackage. It died for me as well.
The output is attached.
-Ted
On Friday 28 October 2005 11:44, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
> A Divendres 28 Octubre 2005 19:10, Steve M. Robbins va escriure:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 06:16:24PM
hmm, looks like it is complaining about the OpenGL dev libraries- I'll install
and try again...
-Ted
On Friday 28 October 2005 12:24, Ted Kisner wrote:
> I installed the build-deps and ran dpkg-buildpackage. It died for me as
> well. The output is attached.
>
> -Ted
>
> On Friday 28 October 200
2.5.1-15 replaces /usr/lib/filerunner/bitmaps by a symlink
to /usr/share/filerunner/bitmaps . The upgrade fails because of this
part of Debian policy (6.4):
"A directory will never be replaced by a symbolic link to a directory
or vice versa; instead, the existing state (symlink or not) will be
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package filerunner
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: filerunner
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> usertag 333484 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags were: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags are now: .
> retitle 333484
Il giorno ven, 28/10/2005 alle 21.10 +0200, Alceste Scalas ha scritto:
> Btw: please use (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op :ironclad) for now --- I've
> just discovered a packaging bug that prevents (clc:clc-require) to work
> correctly. I'll fix it soon :-) (and I'll provide a quick patch if
> needed)
D'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 336198 ipw2100-source
Bug#336198: System hangs, when loading module ipw2100 with firmware
Warning: Unknown package 'ipw-2100'
Bug reassigned from package `ipw-2100' to `ipw2100-source'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
tags 335002 patch
thanks
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 02:05:41PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> wordtrans suffers from the usual GCC 4.0 ICE on arm, hppa and m68k.
> Please use gcc-3.4 on these architectures to work around it.
I plan to NMU this during the current BSP with the following patch
unles
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 335002 patch
Bug#335002: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
I did a build-deps and and dpkg-buildpackage to make sure that I had all the
build depens, but it seems as Ted said and I confirm that I needs the
nvidia-glx-dev.
I have built the package and installed with the box updated today. I have run
again the geomview and it crash in the same place :-
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:55:25PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
> I did a build-deps and and dpkg-buildpackage to make sure that I had all the
> build depens, but it seems as Ted said and I confirm that I needs the
> nvidia-glx-dev.
The Question is: why the package needs nvidia-glx-d
A Divendres 28 Octubre 2005 21:59, Artur R. Czechowski va escriure:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:55:25PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
> > I did a build-deps and and dpkg-buildpackage to make sure that I had all
> > the build depens, but it seems as Ted said and I confirm that I needs th
On Friday 28 October 2005 13:02, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
> > The Question is: why the package needs nvidia-glx-dev on amd64 and on
> > other platforms it builds succesfully without nvidia-glx-dev?
I think it's because I happen to be using the nvidia X driver and GL
libraries...
-Ted
-
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 01:14:27PM -0700, Ted Kisner wrote:
> On Friday 28 October 2005 13:02, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
> > > The Question is: why the package needs nvidia-glx-dev on amd64 and on
> > > other platforms it builds succesfully without nvidia-glx-dev?
> I think it's because I ha
package libpam-ssh
tags 334916 +patch
thanks
the attached patch seems to fix the problem (probably due to
transition to openssl 0.9.8)
diff -urN libpam-ssh-1.91.0-orig/cipher.c libpam-ssh-1.91.0/cipher.c
--- libpam-ssh-1.91.0-orig/cipher.c 2004-02-19 19:58:20.0 +0100
+++ libpam-ssh-1.91.
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
