Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170136: fixed in chimera2 2.0a19-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324797: fixed in boa-constructor 0.4.4cvs20050714-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:47:43 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324030: fixed in swt-gtk 3.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324797: fixed in boa-constructor 0.4.4cvs20050714-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:47:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326044: fixed in grass 6.0.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327606: fixed in haskell-hsql 1.6-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:47:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328241: fixed in gnometab 0.7.4-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#83833: fixed in chimera2 2.0a19-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Hi,
> ladspa-sdk FTBFS on m68k due to an ICE[1]:
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/ladspa-sdk-1.1/src'
> cc -I. -O3 -fPIC -o plugins/amp.o -c plugins/amp.c
> plugins/amp.c: In function '_init':
> plugins/amp.c:314: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
>
> m68k is known to partic
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.5
> reassign 328271 python-qt3
Bug#328271: eric: fail to start
Bug reassigned from package `eric' to `python-qt3'.
> merge 327360 328271
Bug#327360: python2.3-qt3: undefined symbol: _ZTI1
severity 325120 grave
end
This bug makes account access impossible for systems that rely upon
libpam-ldap for authentication. I am also running in to this problem on
our systems. The bug report is accurate as applied to sudo, passwd, and
other PAM-enabled applications.
I'll have to roll back to
Package: rss2email
Version: 1:2.55-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When running r2e for the first time, it crashes like so on my system:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ r2e new [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ r2e add http://planet.debian.net/rss20.xml
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ r2
2005/9/14, Billy Biggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi, I just got pointed at this bug, I am a developer on the SWT
> project.
>
> The issue here is that in Java memory we need to store pointers to C
> objects. jint is 32 bits, jlong is 64 bits, by the Java spec. To keep
> memory use down, we deci
tags 316973 patch
thanks
Hi,
attached you can find upstream's patch to address this problem.
Cheers,
Moritz
diff -Naur libnss-ldap-238.orig/ldap-nss.c libnss-ldap-238/ldap-nss.c
--- libnss-ldap-238.orig/ldap-nss.c 2005-09-14 23:46:27.0 +0200
+++ libnss-ldap-238/ldap-nss.c 200
package qbrew
tags 327939 + pending
thanks
Hi,
thanks for your notification. I'm currently packaging a new upstream
release, which will also fix this bug.
Cheers,
--
Tobias
"To be is to do" -- Plato
"To do is to be" -- Aristotle
"Do be do be do" -- Sinatra
pgpCu0yXRGxZd.pgp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package qbrew
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: qbrew
> tags 327939 + pending
Bug#327939: qbrew: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Tags were: sid
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
Want to find somebody to have se-x with right now?
Find a female (or male) friend that just wants to f-uck!
There are also a few who want a serious relationship though
So if you want a long-termer, or a one-nighter, you got it ;)
Whatever floats your boat pretty much!
http://www.fallingdfungus.
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328285: fixed in ladspa-sdk 1.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Thanks for reporting this. I will try and reproduce and debug but
would love it if someone else gets to this before I do. I'm
definitely busy this evening and will try to get to this tomorrow.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
Dear Joey/security team,
when preparing a patch for #316972 in sid I noticed that the sid
version (which is identical to the Sarge version from DSA-785)
already contained the required patch. But it isn't mentioned
neither in the changelog nor in the DSA-785. Can you please fix
it in the web version
Shaun Jackman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I'm building the Debian package from the source distribution src.zip
> in swt-3.1-gtk-linux-x86.zip. This build.xml does not contain a
> replace.32.to.64 target, and neither does
> swt-3.1-gtk-linux-x86_64.zip. There is no org/eclipse/swt/tools
> directory eith
Ah, ha! It turns out that this bug is because libpam-ldap in sarge
doesn't have appropriate versioned dependencies on libldap2. I had
recompiled the openldap2 libraries and server on woody to enable SSL
support way back when. Because I used an epoch in the version, it never
got upgraded with the
Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The file util/ansi2knr.c is also GPL. I'm pretty sure it's unused, but
> an easy reference in debian/copyright would cover it.
This may be a problem if it is used, as:
> There are several files that are BSD with advertising clause, including
> libntp/me
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 00:03:36 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote:
> What are you going to replace it with? AFAIK, ntp is the only package
> we have in Debian which supports useful clock synchronization, which
> is essential for a number of other services (e.g., Kerberos).
Isn't chrony a possible replacem
> That may sound like a pretty bad answer though, and feels even worse
> now that I'm typing it. I've been thinking that the correct answer is
> to have SWT packages created from the full eclipse sources like
> Michael's packages do, and then ideally we'll do a proper autoconf
> framework for al
v2-0.7/debian/exiv2-components.png.shar # FIXME(fuji)
/bin/sh: unshar: command not found
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127
**
Build finished at 20050914-1750
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Purging chroot-unstable/bui
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:02:51AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 00:03:36 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > What are you going to replace it with? AFAIK, ntp is the only package
> > we have in Debian which supports useful clock synchronization, which
> > is essential for a nu
retitle 328376 exiv2: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'sharutils'
thanks
Oops, the package name is wrong, it is 'sharutils', not 'shareutils'. Sorry.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 328376 exiv2: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'sharutils'
Bug#328376: exiv2: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'shareutils'
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
Package: jde
Version: 2.3.5-1
Followup-For: Bug #327911
I think adding (require 'jde-util) to jde-bug.el is hackish, as this
only works because that file names shows up pretty early in the list of
files to be compiled (from the `echo *.el`). Short of doing a tsort
over the files, just loading jde
Shaun Jackman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Keeping SWT and Eclipse in different source packages allows the two
> packages to be maintained independently, which I think is a major
> plus. For one, this allows SWT to be patched without having to rebuild
> Eclipse and vice versa. An autoconf'ed SWT tarbal
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 17:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320336: fixed in tcm 2.20+TSQD-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 17:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327362: fixed in tcm 2.20+TSQD-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: fluxconf
Version: 0.9.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
fluxconf fails to build because it cannot execute aclocal-1.9:
> -> Considering automaken
>-> Trying automaken
>-> Cannot install automaken; apt errors follow:
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
>
Package: jde
Version: 2.3.5-1
Followup-For: Bug #327911
This can also be solved by switching off the version checking. In
Xemacs21, this can be done through the menu path:
Options -> Advanced (Customize) -> Emacs -> Programming -> Tools
-> Jde -> Check Version Flag...
-- System Information:
Deb
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:02:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319512: fixed in taglib 1.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322306: fixed in bbpager 0.4.1b1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 307210 + patch
--
The patch below fixes the problem.
thanks,
lamont
diff -ur t/nufw-1.0/src/nuauth/authsrv.c nufw-1.0/src/nuauth/authsrv.c
--- t/nufw-1.0/src/nuauth/authsrv.c 2005-03-03 01:23:54.0 -0700
+++
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 307210 + patch
Bug#307210: nufw_1.0-2(alpha/unstable): assumes sa_restorer is part of sigaction
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
I can confirm that the only binary htmldoc packages I have built (i386)
were built on an unstable system updated that day. The current version,
1.8.24-2, appears to be fine on all architectures besides arm and
powerpc, which appear to be out of date. The problems with arm seem to
be caused by a l
Package: mysql-server
Version: 4.1.13a-3
Severity: grave
The mysql-server package in unstable is completely uninstallable because it
depends on mysql-server-4.1, but mysql-server-4.1 conflicts with it. This
is not an appropriate transition package, as it can never be considered an
installation ca
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 07:11:16PM -0500, Billy Biggs wrote:
> Shaun Jackman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Keeping SWT and Eclipse in different source packages allows the two
> > packages to be maintained independently, which I think is a major
> > plus. For one, this allows SWT to be patched without
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 05:56:48PM -0500, Chad Walstrom wrote:
> Ah, ha! It turns out that this bug is because libpam-ldap in sarge
> doesn't have appropriate versioned dependencies on libldap2. I had
> recompiled the openldap2 libraries and server on woody to enable SSL
> support way back when.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 16:26:15 +0200, Göran Weinholt wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:54:35PM +0300, Harri Järvi wrote:
> > In addition there's a conflict between linuxsampler's aim to be an
> > opensource software, and the license used. Restricting commercial use
> > makes the software nonop
* James Curbo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-14 22:32]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ r2e new [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ r2e add http://planet.debian.net/rss20.xml
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ r2e run
> === SEND THE FOLLOWING TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===
> E: could not parse http://planet.debian.net/rss
101 - 145 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
