Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321926: fixed in feh 1.3.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Package: obby
Version: 0.2.0-1
Severity: serious
needs libsigc++-2.0-dev (>= 2.0.10-2), libgmp3-dev (>= 4.1.4-7)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Justin Pryzby wrote:
A shellscript is segfaulting? Or a command it calls is segfaulting?
If so, which? Add "set -x;" as the second line of the script.
Segfaulting is the following command that is run from the script
exec java -Djava.library.path=/usr/lib \
-classpath $JARS:Azureus2.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 254898 + pending
Bug#254898: gnome-apt: bad debian/copyright
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 262961 + pending
Bug#262961: gnome-apt: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: `errno' undeclared (first use this
function)
Tags were: patch
Tags added:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 323224 by 322500
Bug#323224: libstonith0: uninstallable
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 322500
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 323133 important
Bug#323133: [PR 21123, 4.0 regression, fixed in 4.1] ICE on arm & m68k when
compiling arts (in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101)
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 322500 -1
Bug#322500: libsnmp5: ABI change without SONAME change
Bug 322500 cloned as bug 323348.
> reassign 322500 libsnmp5 5.2.1.2-1
Bug#322500: libsnmp5: ABI change without SONAME change
Bug reassigned from package `libsnmp5,ifstat' to `libsnm
On Aug 15, 2005 at 18:47, Matt Kraai praised the llamas by saying:
> Package: irssi-text
> Version: 0.8.9-3
> Severity: serious
>
> irssi-text fails to build because it cannot define uoff_t:
>
> > /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../..
> > -I../../src-I.
block 323224 by 322500
thanks
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 11:28:57AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 03:50:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 05:00:42PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > > Package: libstonith0
> > > Version: 1.2.3-12
> > > Severity: seriou
Jochen,
The changelog for net-snmp 5.2.1.2-2 states:
* Added conflicts against all packages using libsnmp5 due to upstream
changing the binary API without increasing SONAME. See: #322500
This is not an appropriate fix for this bug. << Conflicts are
contraindicated by policy, because they
> > This version of udev refuses to start with any kernel < 2.6.12, but there
> > is no kernel >= 2.6.12 packaged yet.
>
> No, there is a package.
For those of you who now get interrupted upgrades every time because of udev,
don't have the old version available, would like to fix it even if it m
Package: drupal
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
[I'm pretty sure you are already aware of it; but here it is anyway]
Another XMLRPC vulnerability has been detected that affects Drupal
as well. Please see http://www.hardened-php.net/advisory_142005.66.html
for info
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:35:18PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> libxine-dev depends on slang1-dev | slang1-utf8-dev, which have been
> removed from unstable in favour of libslang2-dev. Please update the
> dependencies of the package, since it's uninstallable in sid atm.
I'll prepare a follo
Hi Sebastien,
djvulibre 3.5.14-6.1 has been accepted into unstable, changing the library
package name from libdjvulibre1 to libdjvulibre15. Reuploading evince with
a build-dependency on libdjvulibre-dev (>= 3.5.14-6.1) should now be
sufficient to fix this bug.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
Package: egroupware
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Hi,
another vulnerability has been found in the XMLRPC code. Please
see http://www.hardened-php.net/advisory_142005.66.html for
more information. egroupware was affected by July's vulnerability,
so it might now be
Package: phpgroupware
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Hi,
another vulnerability has been found in the XMLRPC code. Please
see http://www.hardened-php.net/advisory_142005.66.html for
more information. phpgroupware was affected by July's vulnerability,
so it might be
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 323329 grave
Bug#323329: gkrellm-snmp: directly conflicts with latest libsnmp unstable
version 5.2.1.2-2
Severity set to `grave'.
> tags 323329 sid
Bug#323329: gkrellm-snmp: directly conflicts with latest libsnmp unstable
version 5.2.1.2-2
T
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 01:02:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316096: fixed in libgsf 1.12.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:00:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322467: Please Help
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
severity 323329 grave
tags 323329 sid
block 323329 by 322500
thanks
In fact, it is libsnmp5 that conflicts with gkrellm-snmp, not the other way
around; and this is a bug in libsnmp5, because the current version of
libsnmp5 is not ABI-compatible with previous versions.
The correct fix here is to r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 323276 + fixed
Bug#323276: libxine-dev: depends on slang1-dev | slang1-utf8-dev, which are not
in sid
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 323276 patch
Bug#323276: libxine-dev: depends on slang1-dev | slang1-utf8-dev, which are not
in sid
Tags were: fixed
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
Christoph Haas wrote:
> Hi, Martin...
>
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 07:09:02AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Please retry in the sarge chroot on gluck or escher. I've just
> > rebuilt it in both environments and both times the pdns_*.deb
> > contained both /usr/share/doc/pdns and /usr/share/doc-
Package: librrd2-dev
Version: 1.2.11-0.1
Severity: serious
Hello,
During installation of librrd2-dev I noticed following message:
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/librrd2-dev_1.2.11-0.1_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/librrd.la', which is also in package librrd
tags 323276 patch
thanks
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:51:16AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:35:18PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > libxine-dev depends on slang1-dev | slang1-utf8-dev, which have been
> > removed from unstable in favour of libslang2-dev. Please update
Package: libodbcinstq1
Version: 2.2.11-8
Severity: serious
The libodbcinstq1 package needs to go through the C++ transition and be
renamed to libodbcinstq1c2; however, there are currently no packages in
Debian which use libodbcinstq1 except for unixodbc-bin, and transitioning
unixodbc at this poin
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 01:47:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323319: fixed in iptraf 2.7.0-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 01:48:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libsoup2.0 removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:26:54AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> tags 323276 patch
> thanks
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:51:16AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:35:18PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > > libxine-dev depends on slang1-dev | slang1-utf8-dev, which have
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 02:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323061: fixed in socketapi 1.3.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: bluez-utils
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Justification: user security hole
A vulnerability in hcid has been found. Please see this URL for details:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=7893206&forum_id=1881
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101557
Upstream
Package: php4
Version: 4:4.3.10-15
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hello
A security flaw in XML::RPC has become known. From the version numbers
it seems to affect Debian. (I did not check which distributions and packages
exactly though).
More information is available here:
http://www.cve
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 02:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285546: fixed in bristol 0.9.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Hello,
I've not tested anything but I may have found the cause for this
problem. Freshly extracted, the source package contains some cruft which
gets removed upon running debian/rules clean. Specifically,
pdns-2.9.17/debian/CVS
pdns-2.9.17/debian/CVS/Root
pdns-2.9.17/debia
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 03:02:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317199: fixed in hydrogen 0.9.2beta3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: kmymoney2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/wh# LANGUAGE=C apt-get install kmymoney2
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible sit
I fixed it in irssi svn a few months ago (r3726): gcc 4 uses the wrong
config.h. Fixed it by replacing "config.h" with "../config.h" in common.h
( See also http://bugs.irssi.org/index.php?do=details&id=219 )
Wouter.
pgptIVhvcp5aX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: subversion
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: grave
svn segfaults when using LC locales (probably) other than C:
Scenario:
set | grep LC
LC_ALL=pl_PL
LC_LANG=pl_PL
LC_TIME=pl_PL
svn add -force some_catalog/
(...)
getdents64(4, /* 0 entries */, 4096)= 0
open("/usr/share/locale/pl_PL/LC_MES
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 10:23:41AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> That is very strange. I've just rebuilt it on gluck
> (see /tmp/joey for log and packages) and it does still contain
> the doc-base directory.
I was too slow for /tmp/joey. :(
Matthijs suspected that it might have to do with gluck
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 239373 + fixed
Bug#239373: libquicktime-dev: FTBFS : problem with automake
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: fixed
> tag 305174 + fixed
Bug#305174: Libquicktime 0.9.4 released
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 322640 + fixed
Bug#32
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 323067 normal
Bug#323067: autopartkit: Forgets the size of disk
Severity set to `normal'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 04:02:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323181: fixed in ace 5.4.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Alexander Fieroch wrote:
> Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > did you try latest 2.6.12 from unstable?
> > did it help?
>
> yes I did a try but there are the same problems.
> I'm also testing the current development git-kernel snapshots with still
> no change.
> Follow this thread
Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 10:23:41AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > That is very strange. I've just rebuilt it on gluck
> > (see /tmp/joey for log and packages) and it does still contain
> > the doc-base directory.
>
> I was too slow for /tmp/joey. :(
>
> Matthijs suspect
Package: kismet
Version: 2005.07.R1a-1
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
2005.08.R1 fixes some security holes related to mangled SSID and bad
pcap files.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'
Steve Langasek wrote:
>The changelog for net-snmp 5.2.1.2-2 states:
>
> * Added conflicts against all packages using libsnmp5 due to upstream
>changing the binary API without increasing SONAME. See: #322500
>
>This is not an appropriate fix for this bug. << Conflicts are
>contraindicated by
Package: kraptor
Version: 0.0.20040403-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid
kraptor fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due to
bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.
Package: umfpack
Version: 4.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid
umfpack fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due to
bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4.
A ful
Package: python-extclass
Version: 1.2.0zope-2.5.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid
python-extclass fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
less optimizatio
Guys
I have the same problem as reported by Thomas Quas. Hopefully the
following is useful. Let me know if you want me to try anything. I have
done some similar tests I saw in the log. best regards. Marty
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gdb evolution
GNU gdb 6.3-debian
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundatio
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 323124 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#323124: tinyca: crashes on startup
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.5-3
Followup-For: Bug #321712
[15:50] < amgod> [(status)] /server irc.oulu.net irssi: relocation error:
/lib/tls/libnss_dns.so.2: symbol __res_maybe_init, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not
defined in file libc.so.
[15:50] < amgod> no hoh
So it's happening with irssi-text fr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 320581 4:3.3.2-6.1
Bug#320581: kdelibs4: kmail crashes on startup with segmentation fault
Bug marked as not found in version 4:3.3.2-6.1.
> found 320581 4:3.3.2-7
Bug#320581: kdelibs4: kmail crashes on startup with segmentation fault
Bug marke
Package: snowflake
Version: 0.01a-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
No matter what command line switches I try, the only result I got so
far from snowflake is a segfault, e.g.:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ snowflake -z 32
Segmentation fault
Regards,
Laurent.
-- System Info
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:42:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Additional information
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # this was already fixed
> reassign 317204 kdelibs4 4:3.3.2-6.1
Bug#317204: libjack0.80.0-0 removed from unstable; rebuild required
Bug reassigned from package `kdelibs' to `kdelibs4'.
> # tag 317204 sid
> close 317204 4:3.3.2-7
Bug#317204: libjack0.80
reasign 317543 kdelibs4-dev
merge 318017 317543
thanks
* Mike Markley [Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:39:53 -0700]:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 04:44:20PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > /usr/include/kde/kactioncollection.h:242: error: ISO C++ forbids
> > declaration of 'KXMLGUIClient' wi
* Bernhard Sadlowski [Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:38:08 +0200]:
> Package: kdelibs4
> Version: 4:3.3.2-6.1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> Updating kdelibs to 3.3.2-7 breaks kmail on 3 different Linux Systems
> with Debian/unstable installed and Kernel 2.6.11-mm1:
> Standar
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.5-3
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux freevo 2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Son Apr 14 09:53:28 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
-- no debconf information
--
# Actually a kdelibs4-dev bug
reassign 323093 kdelibs4-dev
merge 323093 318017
thanks
* Bas Zoetekouw [Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:21:19 +0200]:
> clone 317543 -1
> reassign -1 amarok
> thanks
> Amarok (1.2.4) suffers from this same problem:
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
> -I/tmp/amarok-1.2.4/build-tree/
> ...
> i set libgd2 to install but then came:
>
> unknown user cyrus in statusoverride file
> Errorcode 2
>
> Then dselect ends with error 100.
>
> I wonder why nut needs a username or am i reading wrong?
>
> i added the user cyrus as a normal user (with adduser) then 'apt-get libgd2'
> works. It
Can you make it produce a core file and get a backtrace of the failure?
I don't have a ppc system, so I'm going to need some help on this one.
Thanks,
Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 15:31 +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
> Versions of packages snowflake depends on:
> ii libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared libraries
> an
> ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-10 The GLib library of C routines
> ii libgtk1.21.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 257588 pending
Bug#257588: kdelibs: Please provide kdelibs4-dbg
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tag 268659 pending
Bug#268659: konqueror: User-Agent string should be Debian-branded by default
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pendin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Actually a kdelibs4-dev bug
> reassign 323093 kdelibs4-dev
Bug#323093: arson: FTBFS: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'KXMLGUIClient' with
no type
Bug reassigned from package `amarok' to `kdelibs4-dev'.
> merge 323093 318017
Bug#318017: kdelibs4-dev:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # there was a typo
> reassign 317543 kdelibs4-dev
Bug#317543: arson: FTBFS: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'KXMLGUIClient' with
no type
Bug reassigned from package `arson' to `kdelibs4-dev'.
> merge 318017 317543
Bug#317543: arson: FTBFS: ISO C++ forb
Package: cryptsetup
Version: 20050111-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
I'm using cryptsetup on todays (2005-08-16) sid but its not useable anymore:
# cryptsetup -v create crypto /dev/hdb2
Command failed: Incompatible libdevmapper 1.01.04 (2005-08-02)(compat) and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> forwarded 318550 http://rt.cpan.org/NoAuth/Bug.html?id=7436
Bug#318550: libxml-sax-writer-perl: FTBFS: Test failure
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://rt.cpan.
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:02:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318550: fixed in libxml-sax-writer-perl 0.44-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Actually the whole Gnome suite is uninstallable due to this missing
library.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
gnome: Depends: gnome-desktop-environment (= 1:2.10.1.1) but it is not
installable
Then:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
gnome-desktop-environment: Dep
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 323372 normal
Bug#323372: kmymoney2: package cannot be installed on sid
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
Le mardi 16 août 2005 à 18:11 +0200, Benjamin FRANCOIS a écrit :
> Actually the whole Gnome suite is uninstallable due to this missing
> library.
That's a known issue and that's beeing working. Maybe you should use
testing if you don't want to have issues due to transitions.
Cheers,
Sebastien B
severity 323372 normal
thanks
Walter,
Thanks for your bug report. Unfortunately there isn't much point in
rebuilding kmymoney2 until the current G++ transition is progressed. More
details on the transition are available here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2005/08/msg00089.html
While KDE
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 323355 + fixed
Bug#323355: librrd2-dev has the same file as librrd0 and those packages do not
conflict with each other
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bu
If this issue is known and being handled, it might be a great idea to
say so, since remaining silent leaves the users considering the bug is
actually being ignored by the maintainer.
Just my 2 cents.
--
a sprite is anything not static
a sprite is a variable object
a sprite is a fucking soda
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319156: fixed in dutch 1:0.1e-37
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294391: fixed in turqstat 2.2.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#262759: fixed in turqstat 2.2.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#262759: fixed in turqstat 2.2.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294391: fixed in turqstat 2.2.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 323331 https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=1343
Bug#323331: [patch] ld10k1 not 64bit clean.
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=1343.
> thanks
Stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 249642 serious
Bug#249642: cdrdao: FTBFS amd64: x86_64 not supported
Bug#249634: FTBFS: the configure script uses the host cpu and not the
architectur
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Le mardi 16 août 2005 à 19:58 +0200, Benjamin FRANCOIS a écrit :
> If this issue is known and being handled, it might be a great idea to
> say so, since remaining silent leaves the users considering the bug is
> actually being ignored by the maintainer.
It has been commented on IRC, on the gtk-gno
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:17:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323248: fixed in m-tx 0.60-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 320268 + fixed
Bug#320268: FTBFS: Missing class declaration
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databas
Package: libgnome2-ruby
Version: 0.13.0-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
I can't run gnome2 ruby programs, it's always complaining
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/gnomecanvas2.rb:11: undefined method `set_log_domain' for
GLib::Log:Module (NoMethodError)
E.g. just run
% ruby /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/gnome2.rb
/usr/lib/r
Package: bsmtpd
Version: 2.3pl8b-16
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
sbsmtp will gladly ignore any error-exit status codes from UUX, and proceed
to act as if mail was corretly delivered.
If backups are enabled, that means the batch ends up in the bak dir for a
while, if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag #323238 +unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#323238: gdesklets: gDesklets will not start
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
tag #323238 +unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
Hello,
I have not been able to successfully reproduce this bug, after upgrading
to python2.3 2.3.5-7.
I tried to reuse the existing gdesklets configuration or to make a brand
new one (by removing the .gdesklets folder).
What exactly happens when you r
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:47:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323248: fixed in m-tx 0.60-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Hi Henrique!
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Package: bsmtpd
> Version: 2.3pl8b-16
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
> sbsmtp will gladly ignore any error-exit status codes from UUX, and proceed
> to act as if mail was corretly delivered.
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 322629 grave
Bug#322629: f-prot-installer: Script /usr/bin/f-prot doesn't work with f-prot
4.6.0
Severity set to `grave'.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 04:17:59PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.3.5-3
> Followup-For: Bug #321712
> [15:50] < amgod> [(status)] /server irc.oulu.net irssi: relocation error:
> /lib/tls/libnss_dns.so.2: symbol __res_maybe_init, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not
> defined in
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 11:30:10AM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 15:31 +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
> > Versions of packages snowflake depends on:
> > ii libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared
> > libraries an
> > ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-1
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 14:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323320: fixed in libclass-objecttemplate-perl 0.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 23:27:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #322105,
regarding gcompris: FTBFS in sid 2005-08-09
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) Bruno Caudoin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
(NB: If you are a
Package: libdevhelp-1-0
Version: 0.10-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Setting up libdevhelp-1-0 (0.10-3) ...
I/O warning : failed to load external entity
"/etc/gconf/schemas/devhelp.schemas"
Failed to open `/etc/gconf/schemas/devhelp.schemas': No such file or directory
d
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 14:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320355: fixed in swt-gtk 3.0+3.1M4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 311502 Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#311502: spamassassin: hangs when disk is full
Changed Bug submitter from Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Baruch Even
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> submitter 323237 Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#32
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> I fully agree with you. I suggest to put bsmtpd itself in the
> bitbucket. The code is quite old, hard to read and every time I look
> deeper into it, I find some problems in the code like above.
Ok. I am going to revert to my shell scripts, which
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
