Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 322642 + wontfix
Bug#322642: FTBFS: toc/tests/cpp/gcc_2_95_typename_problem.cpp fails
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:46:27 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mozilla-firefox: still don't work
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:46:27 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mozilla-firefox: still don't work
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
On 05-Aug-11 19:49, Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> this is already fixed in the current development branch, and thus will
> be fixed in the next stable yaboot release.
Great, thanks!
Regards
Andreas Jochens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
tags 322642 + wontfix
thanks
Sorry for this, but I won't fix this bug. libs11n 1.1 has been out
for a while, but it's a major pain to package. I have not had the
time for it yet.
When 1.1 is released, this bug can be closed, although I am not sure
how to handle the migration, since 1.1 is API and
[Steve Halasz]
> I believe debian/libgdal1.files needs to be renamed to
> libgdal12c.files.
>
> Also may need to be renamed on dh_makeshlibs and dh_shlibdeps lines
> in debian/rules.
You are right. My NMU to fix the C++ transition was incomplete. I'm
working on a new version now.
--
Petter Rei
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 322664 + fixed
Bug#322664: libgdal12c is empty and other C++ ABI transition problems
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Horms wrote:
> > > There is no public CVE assignment for this issue. If's it easily
> > > reproducable
> > > for non-root, it might account as a local DoS vulnerability.
> >
> > mii-tool's IOCTL is only allowed by root.
> >
> > The remote DoS comes from the fact that snmpd will call this IOCTL w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package mga-vid-source
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: mga-vid-source
> tags 317679 patch
Bug#317679: mga-vid-source: unresolved symbol remap_page_range kernel 2.6.11.6
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> severity 317679 serious
Bug#317679: mga
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package python-crypto
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: python-crypto
> reopen 318012
Bug#318012: revelation: Can't be installed because of libgmp3 dependency
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:26:49AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> > > > There is no public CVE assignment for this issue. If's it easily
> > > > reproducable
> > > > for non-root, it might account as a local DoS vulnerability.
> > >
> > > mii-tool's IOCTL is only allowed by roo
Package: nip2
Version: 7.10.10-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Jay,
the current package crashes whenever an image or workspace is loaded.
I downloaded the current CVS version of vips and nip2 (nip2-7.11.1)
and verified the problem there (gcc 4.0.2 20050806); it occu
This issue is still present with the current version of g++ in unstable and
testing (I wouldn't have expected it to go away). It also is no longer
blocked by the C++ transition, as fltk1.1 is now available on all
architectures with the g++4.0 ABI. Will, are you going to be able to upload
a fix fo
Okay, lessons learned etc., here's a sugggestion:
Since it's been less than 24 hours since the NMU was accepted, I propose
that if I can get the new 1.2.7 package done by 8 PM EDT tonight
(midnight GMT), that I just use the same package names in 1.2.5.3-6.1.
This should not cause too much trouble
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:26:45PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> I am trying to clean up my unstable chroot, for some reason a few ocaml
> packages were still installed.
This bug report shows two different problems:
1) ocaml-md5sums may be not available when postrm scripts are invoked
2)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 322467 2.0.2-31
Bug#322467: [CAN-2005-2097] Loca Table Verification Remote Denial of Service
Vulnerability
Bug marked as not found in version 2.0.2-31.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 322210 + pending
Bug#322210: [m68k] ocaml-nox: can not be removed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
notfound 322467 2.0.2-31
stop
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Hello Thomas, hello Debian Security team,
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tetex-bin_3.0 in experimental is vulnerable.
This is about CAN-2005-2097, see
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14529/info. The provided patch (see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=322467) is said
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:37:37AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:26:45PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > I am trying to clean up my unstable chroot, for some reason a few ocaml
> > packages were still installed.
>
> This bug report shows two different probl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package python-crypto
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: python-crypto
> tag #318012 -unreproducible
Bug#318012: revelation: Can't be installed because of libgmp3 dependency
Tags were: unreproducible sid
Tags removed: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping proc
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:37:37AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:26:45PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > I am trying to clean up my unstable chroot, for some reason a few ocaml
> > packages were still installed.
>
> This bug report shows two different probl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 318693 patch
Bug#318693: piuparts: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thank
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:09:10AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > 1) ocaml-md5sums may be not available when postrm scripts are invoked
> Sure, you should use it in prerm, since postrm removes it, no ?
No, I can't, since when prerm is invoked .md5sums entries are still in
/var/lib/ocaml/md5sums/. S
tags 318693 patch
thank
Please find here a very simple patch to fix this (hope it helps fixing
it faster).
Patch:
cut here
--- /tmp/control2005-08-12 11:31:15.732023550 +0200
+++ debian/control 2005-08-12 11:30:33.231157304 +0200
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
Maintainer: Lars Wirzenius
pe, 2005-08-12 kello 11:37 +0200, Jerome Warnier kirjoitti:
> tags 318693 patch
> thank
>
> Please find here a very simple patch to fix this (hope it helps fixing
> it faster).
Thanks. I'm on vacation until the end of the week. I'll fix it when I
get back.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
>
> The buildd in question is currently running a 2.4.26-64 kernel.
>
Cool (I didn't thought that there was still systems running 2.4)
> > In fact while simply rebuilding a kernel (as root, without fakeroot), I also
> > observe a segfault with 2.6.8 and 2.6.10 (on c110 and d380) but panicing
> >
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:41:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Those bugs are done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Package: ghemical
Version: 1.51-1
Severity: grave
File: /usr/bin/ghemical
Justification: renders package unusable
Ghemical is missing dependency on lapack3 and refblas3:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ldd /usr/bin/ghemical
[...]
liblapack.so.3 => not found
libblas.so.3 => not found
[...]
"
Hi Matt,
> Thank you for the report! This will be fixed in the next upload.
When are you planning that to be? wxwindows2.4 is fully transitioned now
(except for arm, which is arch-specific breakage you probably want to
ignore), so it would be great if these two bugs could get fixed. I'm happy
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:51:30AM +0200, Joel Soete wrote:
> > The buildd in question is currently running a 2.4.26-64 kernel.
> Cool (I didn't thought that there was still systems running 2.4)
Well, sarge also shipped as 2.6-only, for hppa; so if the answer is that
this problem happens to go aw
> Well, sarge also shipped as 2.6-only, for hppa; so if the answer is that
> this problem happens to go away when upgrading to 2.6, that's probably
> acceptable, since 2.4 kernels will have been unsupported on hppa for a full
> stable release by the time etch comes out.
It doesn't go away with 2.6
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 04:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320439: fixed in blitz++ 1:0.8-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 04:17:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322210: fixed in ocaml 3.08.3-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: exim4-daemon-heavy
Version: 4.52-1
Followup-For: Bug #285371
was all fine with 4.51, problems are back with this version.
maybe my p2 machine is too slow or does not deliver enough valid random data.
1. send a message from mozilla with tls
2. connection establishes and hangs on for ~20m
> This is why I'm contacting you, Thomas: Although according to the
> CHANGES file we should have xpdf-3.00 just as the xpdf package has, but
> at least one file (which should be patched) is missing in the teTeX
> sources.
The following changes are done to the original sources:
- xpdf/GlobalPara
Hi,
Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> Package: pdns
> Version: 2.9.17-13sarge1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 6.5.4
>
> Both pdns-doc_2.9.17-13sarge1_all.deb and pdns_2.9.17-13sarge1_all.deb
> contain /usr/share/doc-base/pdns. This prevents whichever of these
> packages is second in the i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 322269 + pending
Bug#322269: require static lib
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 320973 + pending
Bug#320973: libboost-program-options1.33.0: Static libraries missing.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 322386 +
Package: horde2
Version: 2.2.8-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
My users have begun to report that they're receiving fatal errors on
attempting to login, in particular to webmail/imp3. It's not clear
exactly when this started, unfortunately.
I'm logging the bug here, rath
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:40:14PM +0200, Rasmus Bøg Hansen wrote:
> Ghemical is missing dependency on lapack3 and refblas3:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ldd /usr/bin/ghemical
> [...]
> liblapack.so.3 => not found
> libblas.so.3 => not found
> [...]
>
> "apt-get install lapack3 refbla
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 322702 serious
Bug#322702: openoffice.org2-writer: Missing dependency to libstlport
Severity set to `serious'.
> reassign 322702 openoffice.org2
Bug#322702: openoffice.org2-writer: Missing dependency to libstlport
Bug reassigned from package `
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> close 319642
Bug#319642: anjuta: experimental version doesn't depend on experimental
anjuta-common
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed,
Package: ocaml-nox
Version: 3.08.3-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
Hi,
ocamlc and ocamlopt need at least gcc and ld to work correctly (there
are also references to nm and objcopy), but the package doesn't declare
this dependency. This missing dependency has of course not been
detec
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 206362 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#206362: openoffice.org: word-completion with "tab" key
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> tag 316030 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#316030: SystemError: dynamic module not initalized correctk
Steve Langasek wrote:
> When are you planning that to be? wxwindows2.4 is fully transitioned
> now (except for arm, which is arch-specific breakage you probably want
> to ignore), so it would be great if these two bugs could get fixed.
> I'm happy to do a quick NMU of audacity 1.2.3 if you prefer
any update on the matter? had you another crash?
is your hadware stable, any particular problems?
i must confess to have seen a similar crash on one
of our university machines. it was running 2.4.25
and this bug happened once. machine shouldn't have
been under mem pressure, but had a quite long up
Package: dhcp-client-udeb
Version: 2.0pl5-19.1
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Installations for 1386 using current daily builds (using 2.6.12) are
failing with a screen saying "no default route could be set".
The cause for this is that in /etc/dhclient the 'ip route add' command is
failing. It retu
Hi,
Am Freitag, 12. August 2005 11:29 schrieb Steffen Moeller:
> I have no [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/openoffice2/program/soffice &
> [1] 11207
ugh. don't do that. Use ooffice2, oowriter2 or whatever
> I have no [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/openoffice2/program/javaldx: error
> while load
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 315923 grub-installer
Bug#315923: Kernel panic after Sarge installation on Dell with SATA drive
Bug reassigned from package `install' to `grub-installer'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
reassign 315923 grub-installer
stop
seems the wrong menu.lst got written to disk.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:18:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 1.9.121-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 01:19:04PM -0400, Kevin Dwyer wrote:
>
> I've been too busy to look at this yet. Any help would be appreciated.
>
> I'll see if I can solicit a patch from some of the other periodic
> developers.
There is now some working code in the sourceforge CVS. Please test if
you
Hi,
I noticed two build failures of my NMU -2.1 upload. I prepared a -2.2
package that fixes those remaining issues.
I try to upload that this evening (meaning german time :).
Here is the changelog:
python-crypto (2.0+dp1-2.2) unstable; urgency=low
* NMU to fix build failures on some architect
I just upgraded apache and PHP4 and hit this problem. So it definitely
looks like an incompatibility with newer PHP.
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 07:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321310: fixed in f-spot 0.0.13-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:18:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 1.9.121-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 07:02:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308879: fixed in tinyca 0.7.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:18:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 1.9.121-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
On 2005-08-12 13:36:32 +0200, Thomas Esser wrote:
> > Now I'm wondering which changes you have made to the upstream sources,
> > and whether they were on purpose; and whether this makes teTeX
> > non-vulnerable, or requires a different patch to fix the vulnerability.
>
> For the reasons given abov
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 320325 normal
Bug#320325: tdiary: [dummy] Wait for the next release.
Severity set to `normal'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs dat
Herewith attached patch seems to solve the problem, after some quick
testing. I tested only IMP3 and only the basic functionalities.
--
Lionel
--- /usr/share/horde2/lib/Cipher/BlockMode.php.deb 2005-08-12
16:51:22.358659640 +0200
+++ /usr/share/horde2/lib/Cipher/BlockMode.php 2005-08-12 16
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joey Hess wrote:
> This RC bug has the effect of blocking the security fix in the new
> version in unstable from reaching testing. I think that's remote
> security holes are generally considered more invonvenient than
> functionlity decreases, so I sug
(I trimmed the cc list a bit)
Dave,
Could this actually be a gcc problem?
Take a look at this:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x406dbd20 in __canonicalize_funcptr_for_compare ()
from /usr/lib/debug/libpthread.so.0
#1 0x406d7424 in __pthread_sigaction (sig=18, act=0xc0241ec8,
oact=0xc0241f50)
at signal
Bernd Feige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the current package crashes whenever an image or workspace is loaded.
> I downloaded the current CVS version of vips and nip2 (nip2-7.11.1)
> and verified the problem there (gcc 4.0.2 20050806); it occurs in
> led.c:107, within gdk_pixmap_create_from_xpm_d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 317386 important
Bug#317386: Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 309964 linux-2.6
Bug#309964: "drive appears confused (ireason = 0x01)" and linux hangs
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.11-9-em64t-p4-smp' to `linux-2.6'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=313334;msg=12
> # doko made a typo in June and has not yet noticed it -- meanwhile
> # twisted 2.0 has not progressed to testing, because of this.
> package twisted-doc-api
Ignoring bugs not assigne
# See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=313334;msg=12
# doko made a typo in June and has not yet noticed it -- meanwhile
# twisted 2.0 has not progressed to testing, because of this.
package twisted-doc-api
severity 313334 normal
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.5-3
Severity: serious
# dpkg --configure -a
Setting up locales (2.3.5-3) ...
Generating locales (this might take a while)...
[...]
Generation complete.
*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x0873f7f0 ***
dpkg: error processing locales (--configure):
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:32:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#146326: fixed in gnomesword 2.1.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On 2005-08-12 16:08:07 +0200, Martin Schroeder wrote:
> I don't know about 2005-2097, but the worst would be a crash of
> pdfTeX. Is a patch around?
I've found it and checked the code: The vulnerable code
(fofi/FoFiTrueType.cc) is only called from the interactive code
(xpdf/PShOutputDev.cc and xpd
Dear Jay,
> Have you reported any bugs against gcc on this?
No, I thought it should be first verified and upstream notified about the
problem;
maybe they know of any specialties in their code that may trigger it. Then, a
smaller
test case should probably be produced for the gcc maintainers...
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:32:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#146326: fixed in gnomesword 2.1.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:47:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322579: fixed in boost 1.33.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318681: fixed in gcl 2.6.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 304604 - experimental
Bug#304604: perl: heap corruption causes installation of other packages to fail
(debconf is aborting) with new glibc
Tags were: experimental
Tags removed: experimental
> severity 304604 serious
Bug#304604: perl: heap corrupt
tags 304604 - experimental
severity 304604 serious
reassing 322746 perl
merge 322746 304604
thanks
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 05:24:10PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> # dpkg --configure -a
> Setting up locales (2.3.5-3) ...
> Generating locales (this might take a while)...
> [...]
> Generation com
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319120: fixed in 3ddesktop 0.2.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi.
As said, I created a NMU for this bug (not really uploaded into the
archive though). The files of the NMU are available at
http://mail.incase.de/NMUs/
I first created this NMU with my own patch, but given that it is cleaner
than mine, I converted it to use the patch given in this bugreport.
r
Hello
Thanks a lot for the patch.
Do you know if this problem affect sarge as well as sid?
Regards,
// Ola
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 05:05:13PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Herewith attached patch seems to solve the problem, after some quick
> testing. I tested only IMP3 and only the basic
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303847: fixed in 3ddesktop 0.2.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> severity 321974 serious
Bug#321974: upgrade forces pdns-server to use pipe backend
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> tags 322352 + unreproducible
Bug#322352: pdns and pdns-doc both contain /usr/share/doc-base/pdns (sarge
security update version)
Tags were: sarge
Tags added: unreproducible
>
End of
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 06:20:14PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Do you know if this problem affect sarge as well as sid?
I don't know for a fact, but assuming that this problem came with PHP
4.4, it wouldn't affect sarge, which has PHP 4.3.10.
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> tags 321974 + pending
Bug#321974: upgrade forces pdns-server to use pipe backend
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contac
> #1 0x406d7424 in __pthread_sigaction (sig=18, act=0xc0241ec8,
> oact=0xc0241f50)
> at signals.c:106
> 106 if (old == SIG_IGN || old == SIG_DFL || old == SIG_ERR)
> (gdb) print &old
> Address requested for identifier "old" which is in register $r11
> (gdb) print /x $r11
> $6 =
> The handling of function pointers in 4.0 branch was broken prior to
> this change:
>
> 2005-07-02 Jeff Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * tree-ssa-dom.c (find_equivalent_equality_comparison): Do not
> a eliminate type conversion which feeds an equality comparison
> if the origin
Bernd Feige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Jay,
>
>> Have you reported any bugs against gcc on this?
>
> No, I thought it should be first verified and upstream notified
> about the problem; maybe they know of any specialties in their code
> that may trigger it. Then, a smaller test case should
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 304604 - experimental
Bug#304604: perl: heap corruption causes installation of other packages to fail
(debconf is aborting) with new glibc
There were no tags set.
Tags removed: experimental
> severity 304604 serious
Bug#304604: perl: heap corrupt
tags 304604 - experimental
severity 304604 serious
reassign 322746 perl
merge 322746 304604
thanks
This bug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=322746
didn't get reassigned:
tags 304604 - experimental
severity 304604 serious
reassing 322746 perl
merge 322746 304604
th
Hi.
During my NM process, I prepared a NMU for the bugs mentioned in the
subject and CC'ed. I didn't upload it (or rather: ask for upload by a
sponsor) yet, but the packages I prepared are publicly available at
http://mail.incase.de/NMUs/
I will wait a week or so and then ask for upload by a spon
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.5-3
Severity: critical
After upgrading from the sarge libc6, sshd on my computer no longer
accepted connections.
Restarting sshd fixed the problem.
It seems the "restart services" question in the postinst should be
asked for upgrades from < 2.3.5 .
I've set the seve
Package: lvm2
Followup-For: Bug #315339
Nice to see the initial bug (of 2.01.12-1) being addressed so quickly.
However, using 2.01.12-2 gives me similar problems, while using lvm2
metadata. All vgdisplay commands complain about "Incorrect metadata area
header checksum" and trying to modify the LV
On Friday 12 August 2005 09:23, Steve Langasek wrote:
> This issue is still present with the current version of g++ in unstable and
> testing (I wouldn't have expected it to go away). It also is no longer
> blocked by the C++ transition, as fltk1.1 is now available on all
> architectures with the
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:43:42AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:09:10AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > 1) ocaml-md5sums may be not available when postrm scripts are invoked
> > Sure, you should use it in prerm, since postrm removes it, no ?
>
> No, I can't, since
Could you please try reproducing this FTBFS of capi4hylafax again with
capi4hylafax 1:01.02.03-13 and libcapi20-dev 1:3.7.2005-07-09-1.1 ?
I'm not sure why it was looking for /usr/lib/libcapi20, but it might
be a side-effect of #318808.
Thanks.
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: djview
Severity: serious
Hi,
I just looked through the whole mess with djvulibre and noticed that
it was only built on two official archs (i386, uploaded by the
maintainer, and sparc). m68k fails due to a toolchain bug, hppa due to
the broken fakeroot on the buildds and the other fail be
Also, do you have DDI enabled? In this case, is a correct DDIOffset
set in the config file?
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Could you please show me the build log of the capi4hylafax on armd64?
I want to see if it was recognised as 64bit arch or not.
Thanks,
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks fine to me... I will be sure to include it and #322690 into
the 2.0.8 packaging I've been currently working on. Can you please
forward details on how/why regarding the renaming for my information as
I'm obviously behind on the info relating to the ABI changes.
Regards,
Jeremy
S
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
